Binocular Vision and Stereopsis Across the Animal Kingdom

Literature Cited

1. Ackermann J, Goesele M. 2015. A survey of photometric stereo techniques. Found. Trends Comput. Graph. Vis. 9:3–4149–254
   [Google Scholar]
2. Allman J. 1977. Evolution of the visual system in the early primates. Prog. Psychobiol. Physiol. Psychol. 7:1–53
   [Google Scholar]
3. Anderson SJ, Mullen KT, Hess RF. 1991. Human peripheral spatial resolution for achromatic and chromatic stimuli: limits imposed by optical and retinal factors. J. Physiol. 442:47–64
   [Google Scholar]
4. Artal P. 2015. Image formation in the living human eye. Annu. Rev. Vis. Sci. 1:1–17
   [Google Scholar]
5. Atchison DA, Thibos LN. 2016. Optical models of the human eye. Clin. Exp. Optom. 99:99–106
   [Google Scholar]
6. Backus BT, Banks MS, van Ee R, Crowell JA. 1999. Horizontal and vertical disparity, eye position, and stereoscopic slant perception. Vis. Res. 39:61143–70
   [Google Scholar]
7. Baker DH, Lygo FA, Meese TS, Georgeson MA. 2018. Binocular summation revisited: beyond √2. Psychol. Bull. 144:111186–99
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bennett AG, Rabbetts RB. 1989. Clinical Visual Optics Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann
9. Blake R, Fox R. 1973. The psychophysical inquiry into binocular summation. Percept. Psychophys. 14:1161–85
   [Google Scholar]
10. Blake R, Sloane M, Fox R. 1981. Further developments in binocular summation. Percept. Psychophys. 30:3266–76
    [Google Scholar]
11. Blakemore C. 1970. The range and scope of binocular depth discrimination in man. J. Physiol. 211:3599–622
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bloch S, Martinoya C. 1982. Comparing frontal and lateral viewing in the pigeon. I. Tachistoscopic visual acuity as a function of distance. Behav. Brain Res. 5:3231–44
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bonnen K, Matthis JS, Gibaldi A, Banks MS, Levi D, Hayhoe M. 2019. A role for stereopsis in walking over complex terrains. J. Vis. 19:10178b
    [Google Scholar]
14. Bough E. 1970. Stereoscopic vision in macaque monkey: a behavioural demonstration. Nature 225:42–43
    [Google Scholar]
15. Brysch C, Leyden C, Arrenberg AB. 2019. Functional architecture underlying binocular coordination of eye position and velocity in the larval zebrafish hindbrain. BMC Biol 17:1110
    [Google Scholar]
16. Budelmann BU, Young JZ. 1993. The oculomotor system of decapod cephalopods: eye muscles, eye muscle nerves, and the oculomotor neurons in the central nervous system. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 340: 1291.93–125
    [Google Scholar]
17. Butler SR, Templeton JJ, Fernández-Juricic E. 2018. How do birds look at their world? A novel avian visual fixation strategy. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 72:338
    [Google Scholar]
18. Cagenello R, Rogers BJ. 1993. Anisotropies in the perception of stereoscopic surfaces: the role of orientation disparity. Vis. Res. 33:162189–201
    [Google Scholar]
19. Cartmill M 1997. Explaining primate origins. Research Frontiers in Anthropology CR Ember, M Ember 31–46 Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
    [Google Scholar]
20. Cartmill M 2018. Binocular vision. International Encyclopedia of Biological Anthropology, Vol. 1 W Trevathan, M Cartmill, DL Dufour, CL Larsen, DH O'Rourke, et al. 172–76 Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
    [Google Scholar]
21. Changizi MA, Shimojo S. 2008.. “ X-ray vision” and the evolution of forward-facing eyes. J. Theor. Biol. 254:4756–67
    [Google Scholar]
22. Collett TS. 1977. Stereopsis in toads. Nature 267:5609349–51
    [Google Scholar]
23. Colodro-Conde C, Toledo-Moreo FJ, Toledo-Moreo R, Martínez-Álvarez JJ, Garrigós Guerrero J, Ferrández-Vicente JM 2014. Evaluation of stereo correspondence algorithms and their implementation on FPGA. J. Syst. Archit. 60:122–31
    [Google Scholar]
24. Corfield JR, Gsell AC, Brunton D, Heesy CP, Hall MI et al. 2011. Anatomical specializations for nocturnality in a critically endangered parrot, the kākāpō (Strigops habroptilus). PLOS ONE 6:8e22945
    [Google Scholar]
25. Crick F. 1996. Visual perception: rivalry and consciousness. Nature 379:6565485–86
    [Google Scholar]
26. Cumming BG, DeAngelis GC. 2001. The physiology of stereopsis. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24:203–38
    [Google Scholar]
27. Cumming BG, Parker AJ. 1994. Binocular mechanisms for detecting motion-in-depth. Vis. Res. 34:4483–95
    [Google Scholar]
28. Curcio CA, Sloan KR, Kalina RE, Hendrickson AE 1990. Human photoreceptor topography. J. Comp. Neurol. 292:4497–523
    [Google Scholar]
29. de la Motte I, Burkhardt D. 1983. Portrait of an Asian stalk-eyed fly. Naturwissenschaften 70:9451–61
    [Google Scholar]
30. Dearworth JR, Ashworth AL, Kaye JM, Bednarz DT, Blaum JF et al. 2013. Role of the trochlear nerve in eye abduction and frontal vision of the red-eared slider turtle (Trachemys scripta elegans). J. Comp. Neurol. 521:153464–77
    [Google Scholar]
31. Erkelens CJ. 1988. Fusional limits for a large random-dot stereogram. Vis. Res. 28:2345–53
    [Google Scholar]
32. Erkelens CJ, Collewijn H. 1985. Motion perception during dichoptic viewing of moving random-dot stereograms. Vis. Res. 25:4583–88
    [Google Scholar]
33. Fahle M, Schmid M. 1988. Naso-temporal asymmetry of visual perception and of the visual cortex. Vis. Res. 28:2293–300
    [Google Scholar]
34. Fawcett SL. 2005. An evaluation of the agreement between contour-based circles and random dot-based near stereoacuity tests. J. AAPOS 9:6572–78
    [Google Scholar]
35. Feord RC, Sumner ME, Pusdekar S, Kalra L, Gonzalez-Bellido PT, Wardill TJ. 2020. Cuttlefish use stereopsis to strike at prey. Sci. Adv. 6:2eaay6036
    [Google Scholar]
36. Fox R, Lehmkuhle SW, Bush RC. 1977. Stereopsis in the falcon. Science 197:429879–81
    [Google Scholar]
37. Fricke TR, Siderov J. 1997. Stereopsis, stereotests, and their relation to vision screening and clinical practice. Clin. Exp. Optom. 80:5165–72
    [Google Scholar]
38. Frisby JP, Mein J, Saye A, Stanworth A. 1975. Use of random-dot stereograms in the clinical assessment of strabismic patients. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 59:10545–52
    [Google Scholar]
39. Fritsches KA, Marshall NJ. 2002. Independent and conjugate eye movements during optokinesis in teleost fish. J. Exp. Biol. 205:91241–52
    [Google Scholar]
40. Ghahghaei S, McKee S, Verghese P. 2019. The upper disparity limit increases gradually with eccentricity. J. Vis. 19:113
    [Google Scholar]
41. Giaschi D, Lo R, Narasimhan S, Lyons C, Wilcox LM. 2013. Sparing of coarse stereopsis in stereodeficient children with a history of amblyopia. J. Vis. 13:1017
    [Google Scholar]
42. Glennerster A. 1998. d_max for stereopsis and motion in random dot displays. Vis. Res. 38:6925–35
    [Google Scholar]
43. Hartley R, Zisserman A. 2000. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
44. Heesy CP. 2008. Ecomorphology of orbit orientation and the adaptive significance of binocular vision in primates and other mammals. Brain Behav. Evol. 71:154–67
    [Google Scholar]
45. Hibbard PB, Scott-Brown KC, Haigh EC, Adrain M. 2014. Depth perception not found in human observers for static or dynamic anti-correlated random dot stereograms. PLOS ONE 9:1e84087
    [Google Scholar]
46. Hirschmüller H. 2008. Stereo processing by semiglobal matching and mutual information. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 30:2328–41
    [Google Scholar]
47. Janssen P, Vogels R, Liu Y, Orban GA. 2003. At least at the level of inferior temporal cortex, the stereo correspondence problem is solved. Neuron 37:4693–701
    [Google Scholar]
48. Johnston EB. 1991. Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis. Vis. Res. 31:7–81351–60
    [Google Scholar]
49. Julesz B. 1971. Foundations of Cyclopean Perception Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
50. Julesz B 1978. Global stereopsis: cooperative phenomena in stereopsis depth perception. Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol. 8: Perception R Held, HW Leibowitz, H Teuber 215–56 Berlin: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
51. Julesz B, Tyler CW. 1976. Neurontropy, an entropy-like measure of neural correlation, in binocular fusion and rivalry. Biol. Cybernet. 23:125–32
    [Google Scholar]
52. Kaneko H, Howard IP. 1997. Spatial limitation of vertical-size disparity processing. Vis. Res. 37:202871–78
    [Google Scholar]
53. Katz HK, Lustig A, Lev-Ari T, Nov Y, Rivlin E, Katzir G. 2015. Eye movements in chameleons are not truly independent—evidence from simultaneous monocular tracking of two targets. J. Exp. Biol. 218:132097–105
    [Google Scholar]
54. Kelber A, Somanathan H. 2019. Spatial vision and visually guided behavior in Apidae. Insects 10:12418
    [Google Scholar]
55. Kral K, Prete FR 2004. In the mind of a hunter: the visual world of the praying mantis. Complex Worlds from Simpler Nervous Systems FR Prete 75–115 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
56. Lee DN. 1970. Spatio-temporal integration in binocular-kinetic space perception. Vis. Res. 10:165–78
    [Google Scholar]
57. Legge GE. 1984. Binocular contrast summation—I. Detection and discrimination. Vis. Res. 24:4373–83
    [Google Scholar]
58. Linander N, Dacke M, Baird E 2015. Bumblebees measure optic flow for position and speed control flexibly within the frontal visual field. J. Exp. Biol. 218:71051–59
    [Google Scholar]
59. Linton P. 2020. Does vision extract absolute distance from vergence?. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 82:63176–95
    [Google Scholar]
60. Lisney TJ, Wylie DR, Kolominsky J, Iwaniuk AN. 2015. Eye morphology and retinal topography in hummingbirds (Trochilidae: Aves). Brain Behav. Evol. 86:3–4176–90
    [Google Scholar]
61. Liu Y, Aggarwal JK 2005. Local and global stereo methods. Handbook of Image and Video Processing A Bovik 297–307 Amsterdam: Elsevier
    [Google Scholar]
62. Maier A, Panagiotaropoulos TI, Tsuchiya N, Keliris GA. 2012. Introduction to research topic—binocular rivalry: a gateway to studying consciousness. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6:263
    [Google Scholar]
63. Marr D, Poggio T. 1976. Cooperative computation of stereo disparity. Science 194:283–87
    [Google Scholar]
64. Martin GR. 2009. What is binocular vision for? A birds’ eye view. J. Vis. 9:1114
    [Google Scholar]
65. Martin GR, Katzir G. 1999. Visual fields in short-toed eagles, Circaetus gallicus (Accipitridae), and the function of binocularity in birds. Brain Behav. Evol. 53:255–66
    [Google Scholar]
66. McFadden S, Wild J. 1986. Binocular depth perception in the pigeon. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 45:149–60
    [Google Scholar]
67. Mitchell DE. 1969. Qualitative depth localization with diplopic images of dissimilar shape. Vis. Res. 9:8991–94
    [Google Scholar]
68. Movshon J, Thompson I, Tolhurst DJ. 1978. Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. J. Physiol. 283:53–77
    [Google Scholar]
69. Nityananda V, O'Keeffe J, Umeton D, Simmons A, Read JCA 2019. Second-order cues to figure motion enable object detection during prey capture by praying mantids. PNAS 116:5227018–27
    [Google Scholar]
70. Nityananda V, Read JCA. 2017. Stereopsis in animals: evolution, function and mechanisms. J. Exp. Biol. 220:142502–12
    [Google Scholar]
71. Nityananda V, Tarawneh G, Henriksen S, Umeton D, Simmons A, Read JCA. 2018. A novel form of stereo vision in the praying mantis. Curr. Biol. 28:4588–93.e4
    [Google Scholar]
72. Ogle KN. 1953. Precision and validity of stereoscopic depth perception from double images. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 43:10907–13
    [Google Scholar]
73. Ogle KN, Mussey F, Prangen AD. 1949. Fixation disparity and the fusional processes in binocular single vision. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 32:81069–87
    [Google Scholar]
74. Ohzawa I, DeAngelis GC, Freeman RD. 1990. Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors. Science 249:1037–41
    [Google Scholar]
75. Ott M. 2001. Chameleons have independent eye movements but synchronise both eyes during saccadic prey tracking. Exp. Brain Res. 139:2173–79
    [Google Scholar]
76. Otto JM, Bach M, Kommerell G. 2010. Advantage of binocularity in the presence of external visual noise. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 248:4535–41
    [Google Scholar]
77. Palmisano S, Gillam B, Govan DG, Allison RS, Harris JM 2010. Stereoscopic perception of real depths at large distances. J. Vis. 10:619
    [Google Scholar]
78. Panum PL. 1858. Physiologische Untersuchungen über das Sehen mit zwei Augen Kiel, Ger: Schwers
79. Parker AJ. 2007. Binocular depth perception and the cerebral cortex. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8:5379–91
    [Google Scholar]
80. Pettigrew JD 1986. The evolution of binocular vision. Visual Neuroscience JD Pettigrew, KJ Sanderson, WR Lewick 208–22 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
81. Pettigrew JD, Collin SP, Ott M. 1999. Convergence of specialised behaviour, eye movements and visual optics in the sandlance (Teleostei) and the chameleon (Reptilia). Curr. Biol. 9:8421–24
    [Google Scholar]
82. Prete FR, McLean T, McMillin PJ. 1996. Responses to moving small-field stimuli by the praying mantis, Sphodromantis lineola (Burmeister). Brain Behav. Evol. 47:142–54
    [Google Scholar]
83. Ptito M, Lepore F, Guillemot J-P. 1991. Stereopsis in the cat: behavioral demonstration and underlying mechanisms. Neuropsychologia 29:6443–64
    [Google Scholar]
84. Ravosa MJ, Savakova DG. 2004. Euprimate origins: the eyes have it. J. Hum. Evol. 46:3357–64
    [Google Scholar]
85. Read JCA, Phillipson GP, Glennerster A. 2009. Latitude and longitude vertical disparities. J. Vis. 9:1311
    [Google Scholar]
86. Richards W, Kaye MG. 1974. Local versus global stereopsis: two mechanisms?. Vis. Res. 14:121345–47
    [Google Scholar]
87. Richards W, Regan D. 1973. A stereo field map with implications for disparity processing. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 12:12904–9
    [Google Scholar]
88. Rogers BJ, Bradshaw MF. 1993. Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis. Nature 361:6409253–55
    [Google Scholar]
89. Rose D, Blake R, Halpern DL. 1988. Disparity range for binocular summation. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 29:2283–90
    [Google Scholar]
90. Rosner R, Tarawneh G, Lukyanova V, Read JCA. 2020. Binocular responsiveness of projection neurons of the praying mantis optic lobe in the frontal visual field. J. Comp. Physiol. A 206:2165–81
    [Google Scholar]
91. Rosner R, von Hadeln J, Tarawneh G, Read JCA. 2019. A neuronal correlate of insect stereopsis. Nat. Commun. 10:12845
    [Google Scholar]
92. Scharstein D, Szeliski R. 2002. A taxonomy and evaluation of dense two-frame stereo correspondence algorithms. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 47:7–42
    [Google Scholar]
93. Scholl B, Burge J, Priebe N. 2013. Binocular integration and disparity selectivity in mouse primary visual cortex. J. Neurophys. 109:123013–24
    [Google Scholar]
94. Schwind H. 1989. Size and distance perception in compound eyes. Facets of Vision DG Stavenga, RC Hardie 425–44 Berlin: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
95. Serrano-Pedraza I, Phillipson GP, Read JCA. 2010. A specialization for vertical disparity discontinuities. J. Vis. 10:32
    [Google Scholar]
96. Sherrington CS. 1906. Lecture X: Sensual fusion. The Integrative Action of the Nervous System354–94 London: Archibald Constable Co.
    [Google Scholar]
97. Siderov J, Harwerth RS. 1995. Stereopsis, spatial frequency and retinal eccentricity. Vis. Res. 35:162329–37
    [Google Scholar]
98. Smith R. 1738. A Compleat System of Opticks in Four Books, Viz. A Popular, a Mathematical, a Mechanical, and a Philosophical Treatise. To Which Are Added Remarks Upon the Whole London: Stephen Austen
99. Smith SM, Angielczyk KD, Schmitz L, Wang SC. 2018. Do bony orbit dimensions predict Diel activity pattern in sciurid rodents?. Anat. Record. 301:101774–87
    [Google Scholar]
100. Somanathan H, Kelber A, Borges RM, Wallén R, Warrant EJ. 2009. Visual ecology of Indian carpenter bees II: adaptations of eyes and ocelli to nocturnal and diurnal lifestyles. J. Comp. Physiol. A 195:6571–83
     [Google Scholar]
101. Spector RH 1990. Visual fields. Clinical Methods: The History, Physical, and Laboratory Examinations HK Walker, WD Hall, JW Hurst 565–72 Boston: Butterworths, 3rd ed..
     [Google Scholar]
102. Stevens KA. 2006. Binocular vision in theropod dinosaurs. J. Vertebr. Palaeontol. 26:2321–30
     [Google Scholar]
103. Taylor GJ, Tichit P, Schmidt MD, Bodey AJ, Rau C, Baird E 2019. Bumblebee visual allometry results in locally improved resolution and globally improved sensitivity. eLife 8:e40613
     [Google Scholar]
104. Timney B, Keil K 1999. Local and global stereopsis in the horse. Vis. Res. 39:101861–67
     [Google Scholar]
105. Tyler CW 1991. Cyclopean vision. Binocular Vision D Regan 38–74 New York: MacMillan
     [Google Scholar]
106. Tyler CW, Chen C-C. 2000. Signal detection theory in the 2AFC paradigm: attention, channel uncertainty and probability summation. Vis. Res. 40:223121–44
     [Google Scholar]
107. Tyrrell LP, Fernández-Juricic E, Tovey P, White C, Isard P-F, Dulaurent T. 2017. Avian binocular vision: It's not just about what birds can see, it's also about what they can't. PLOS ONE 12:3e0173235
     [Google Scholar]
108. van den Berg AV, Brenner E. 1994. Why two eyes are better than one for judgements of heading. Nature 371:6499700–2
     [Google Scholar]
109. van der Willigen RF. 2000. On the perceptual identity of depth vision in the owl PhD Thesis, Aachen Univ. Ger.:
110. van der Willigen RF. 2011. Owls see in stereo much like humans do. J. Vis. 11:710
     [Google Scholar]
111. van der Willigen RF, Frost BJ, Wagner H. 1998. Stereoscopic depth perception in the owl. Neuroreport 9:61233–37
     [Google Scholar]
112. Vancleef K, Read JCA, Herbert W, Goodship N, Woodhouse M, Serrano-Pedraza I. 2017. Overestimation of stereo thresholds by the TNO stereotest is not due to global stereopsis. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 37:4507–20
     [Google Scholar]
113. Vega-Zuniga T, Medina FS, Fredes F, Zuniga C, Severín D et al. 2013. Does nocturnality drive binocular vision? Octodontine rodents as a case study. PLOS ONE 8:12e84199
     [Google Scholar]
114. Voss J, Bischof H-J. 2009. Eye movements of laterally eyed birds are not independent. J. Exp. Biol. 212:101568–75
     [Google Scholar]
115. Wade NJ, Ono H. 2012. Early studies of binocular and stereoscopic vision. Jpn. Psychol. Res. 54:154–70
     [Google Scholar]
116. Wakayama A, Matsumoto C, Ohmure K, Inase M, Shimomura Y. 2011. Influence of target size and eccentricity on binocular summation of reaction time in kinetic perimetry. Vis. Res. 51:1174–78
     [Google Scholar]
117. Wakayama A, Matsumoto C, Shimomura Y. 2005. Binocular summation of detection and resolution thresholds in the central visual field using parallel-line targets. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 46:82810–15
     [Google Scholar]
118. Wallace DJ, Greenberg DS, Sawinski J, Rulla S, Notaro G, Kerr JND. 2013. Rats maintain an overhead binocular field at the expense of constant fusion. Nature 498:745265–69
     [Google Scholar]
119. Walls GL. 1942. The Vertebrate Eye and Its Adaptive Radiation Bloomfield Hills, MI: Cranbrook Inst. Sci.
120. Warrant EJ. 2008. Seeing in the dark: vision and visual behaviour in nocturnal bees and wasps. J. Exp. Biol. 211:111737–46
     [Google Scholar]
121. Welchman AE. 2016. The human brain in depth: how we see in 3D. Annu. Rev. Vis. Sci. 2:345–76
     [Google Scholar]
122. Wheatstone C. 1838. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 128:371–94
     [Google Scholar]
123. Wood JM, Collins MJ, Carkeet A. 1992. Regional variations in binocular summation across the visual field. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 12:146–51
     [Google Scholar]
124. Zhang ZL, Cantor CR, Schor CM. 2010. Perisaccadic stereo depth with zero retinal disparity. Curr. Biol. 20:131176–81
     [Google Scholar]
125. Zhao L, Wu H. 2019. The difference in stereoacuity testing: contour-based and random dot-based graphs at far and near distances. Ann. Transl. Med. 7:9193
     [Google Scholar]
126. Zlatkova MB, Anderson RS, Ennis FA. 2001. Binocular summation for grating detection and resolution in foveal and peripheral vision. Vis. Res. 41:243093–100
     [Google Scholar]