1932

Abstract

This article provides an up-to-date perspective on the endangerment that contact languages around the world are facing, with a focus on pidgins, creoles, and mixed languages. While language contact is often associated with language shift and hence language endangerment, languages arising from contact also can and do face the risk of endangerment. Recent observations and studies show that contact languages may be at twice the risk of endangerment and loss compared with noncontact languages. The loss of these languages is highly consequential. The arguments that usually apply to why noncontact languages should be conserved also apply to many of these contact languages. This article highlights recent work on the documentation and preservation of contact languages and suggests that much more can be done to protect and conserve this unique category of languages.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011619-030427
2020-01-14
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/linguistics/6/1/annurev-linguistics-011619-030427.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011619-030427&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Aboh EO, Smith N 2009. Complex Processes in New Languages Amsterdam: John Benjamins
  2. Acuo YV. 2004. Primary data of Wutunhua Endangered Languages Archive, SOAS Univ London, London: https://elar.soas.ac.uk/Collection/MPI73784
  3. Adelaar WFH. 2007. Threatened languages in Hispanic South America. See Brenzinger 2007 9–28
  4. Ansaldo U. 2008. Sri Lanka Malay revisited: genesis and classification. Lessons from Documented Endangered Languages K Harrison, D Rood, A Dwyer 13–42 Amsterdam: John Benjamins
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ansaldo U. 2009. Contact Languages: Ecology and Evolution in Asia Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  6. Ansaldo U. 2017. Creole complexity in sociolinguistic perspective. Lang. Sci. 60:26–35
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ansaldo U, Lim L, Mufwene SS 2007. The sociolinguistic history of the Peranakans: what it tells us about “creolization.”. Deconstructing Creole U Ansaldo, S Matthews, L Lim 203–26 Amsterdam: John Benjamins
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Austin P. 2016. Language documentation 20 years on. Endangered Languages: Issues of Ecology, Policy and Documentation L Filipovic, M Pütz 147–70 Amsterdam: John Benjamins
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Austin P, Sallabank J. 2014. Endangered Languages: Beliefs and Ideologies in Language Documentation and Revitalization Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  10. Bakker P. 1997. A Language of Our Own: The Genesis of Michif, the Mixed Cree-French Language of the Canadian Métis Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  11. Bakker P, Daval-Markussen A, Parkvall M, Plag I 2013. Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles. Creole Languages and Linguistic Typology P Bhatt, T Veenstra 9–45 Amsterdam: John Benjamins
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bakker P, Mous M. 1994. Mixed Languages: 15 Case Studies in Language Intertwining Amsterdam: IFOTT
  13. Belew A, Simpson S. 2018. Language extinction then and now. See Campbell & Belew 2018 48–65
  14. Bradley D. 2007. Language endangerment in China and Mainland Southeast Asia. See Brenzinger 2007 278–302
  15. Brenzinger M 2007. Language Diversity Endangered Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
  16. Buchanan SH. 1979. Language and identity: Haitians in New York City. Int. Migr. Rev. 13:2298–313
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Campbell L. 2017. On how and why languages become endangered: reply to Mufwene. Language 93:4e224–33
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Campbell L, Belew A 2018. Cataloguing the World's Endangered Languages London/New York: Routledge
  19. Campbell L, Lee NH, Okura E, Simpson S, Ueki K 2013. New knowledge: findings from the Catalogue of Endangered Languages (ELCat) Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Language Documentation and Conservation, Honolulu, Hawai‛i, Feb 28
  20. Cardoso H. 2017. Documentation of Sri Lanka Portuguese Endangered Languages Archive, SOAS Univ London, London: https://elar.soas.ac.uk/Collection/MPI1035102
  21. Chaudenson R. 1974. Le lexique du parler créole de La Réunion Paris: Champion
  22. Clatchey WC. 2018. Traditional and local knowledge as language legacies critical for conservation. See Rehg & Campbell 2018 701–19
  23. Cockerham S. 2012. Louisiana French: l'heritage at risk. Seattle Times July 6. https://www.seattletimes.com/life/lifestyle/louisiana-french-lheritage-at-risk
    [Google Scholar]
  24. DeGraff M. 2001. On the origin of Creoles: a Cartesian critique of neo-Darwinian linguistics. Linguist. Typol. 5:2–3213–310
    [Google Scholar]
  25. DeGraff M. 2005. Do Creole languages constitute an exceptional typological class?. Rev. Fr. Linguist. Appl. 10:11–24
    [Google Scholar]
  26. DeGraff M. 2017a. Haiti's “linguistic apartheid” violates children's rights and hampers development. OpenGlobalRights Jan. 31. https://www.openglobalrights.org/haiti-s-linguistic-apartheid-violates-children-s-rights-and-hampers-/
    [Google Scholar]
  27. DeGraff M. 2017b. The sustainable (re)vitalization of local languages is indispensable for education, development and social justice: the MIT-Haiti Initiative as case study. Plenary presented at the 2nd International Conference on Documentary Linguistics–Asian Perspectives, Hong Kong, May 25–27
  28. Drager K. 2012. Pidgin and Hawai‛i English: an overview. Int. J. Lang. Transl. Intercult. Commun. 1:161–73
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Edionhon E. 2018. West Africa's pidgins deserve full recognition as official languages. Quartz Africa Oct. 14. https://qz.com/africa/1423524/west-africas-pidgin-can-be-official-language-bbc-shows
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Essegbey J. 2019. Language endangerment, documentation and revitalization. The Oxford Handbook of African Languages R Vossen, GJ Dimmendaal Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press In press
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Evans N, Levinson S. 2009. The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behav. Brain Sci. 32:429–92
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Farquharson JT. 2013. Structure dataset 8: Jamaican. See Michaelis, Maurer, Haspelmath, & Huber 2013. http://apics-online.info/contributions/8
  33. Ferreira J-AS. 2009. The history and future of Patuá in Paria: report on initial language revitalization efforts for French Creole in Venezuela. J. Pidgin Creole Lang. 24:1139–58
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Ferreira J-AS. 2015. Trinidad's French Creole linguistic and cultural heritage: documentation and revitalization issues. Caribbean Dynamics: Reconfiguring Caribbean Culture B Boufoy-Bastick, S Chinien 111–25 Kingston, Jam.: Ian Randle
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Ferreira J-AS, Holbrook D. 2001. Are they dying? The case of some French-lexifier creoles Paper presented at the 4th Annual Islands in Between Conference, Castries St. Lucia: Nov 8–10
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Frank DB. 1993. Political, religious, and economic factors affecting language choice in St. Lucia. Int. J. Sociol. Lang. 1993:10239–56
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Frank DB. 2007. We don't speak a real language: creoles as misunderstood and endangered languages Paper presented at the Symposium on Endangered Languages, College Park, MD: Mar 25
  38. Garrett PB. 2006. Contact languages as “endangered” languages: What is there to lose?. J. Pidgin Creole Lang. 21:1175–90
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Garrett PB. 2012. Dying young: pidgins, creoles and other contact languages as endangered languages. The Anthropology of Extinction: Essays on Culture and Species Death GM Sodikoff 143–62 Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Girault L. 1989. Kallawaya: El Idioma Secreto de Los Incas [ Kallawaya: The Secret Language of the Incas ]. La Paz, Boliv.: UNESCO-OPS-OMS
  41. Golla V, Goddard I, Campbell L, Mithun M, Mixco M 2007. North America. Atlas of the World's Languages C Moseley, R Asher 7–41 London/New York: Routledge, 2nd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Golovko E. 1994. Mednyj Aleut or Copper Island Aleut: an Aleut-Russian mixed language. Mixed Languages: 15 Case Studies in Language Intertwining P Bakker, M Mous 113–21 Amsterdam: IFOTT
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Good J. 2012. “Community” collaboration in Africa: experiences from Northwest Cameroon. Lang. Doc. Descr. 11:28–58
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Grinevald C. 2005. Why Rama and not Rama Cay Creole?. Lang. Doc. Descr. 3:196–224
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Hale K. 1992. Language endangerment and the human value of linguistic diversity. Language 68:135–42
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Harrison KD. 2010. The Last Speakers Washington, DC: Natl. Geogr.
  47. Hauk B, Heaton R. 2018. Triage: setting priorities for endangered language research. See Campbell & Belew 2018 259–304
  48. Himmelmann NP. 2006. Language documentation: What is it and what is it good for?. Essentials of Language Documentation J Gippert, NP Himmelmann, U Mosel 1–30 Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Holm J. 1989. Pidgins and Creoles: A Reference Survey Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  50. Iseke J. 2013. Negotiating Métis culture in Michif: disrupting Indigenous language shift. Decolonization Indig. Educ. Soc. 2:292–116
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Jameson JF. 1909. Narratives of New Netherlands: 1609–1664 New York: Scribner
  52. Krauss M. 1992. The world's languages in crisis. Language 68:14–10
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Krauss M. 2007. Classification and terminology for degrees of language endangerment. See Brenzinger 2007 1–8
  54. Ladefoged P. 1992. Another view of endangered languages. Language 68:4809–11
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Larrea E. 2016. Patuá, the sunset Creole. Unravel Sept. 20. https://unravellingmag.com/articles/patua-the-sunset-creole
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Lee NH. 2014. A grammar of Baba Malay with sociophonetic considerations PhD Thesis, Univ. Hawai‛i, Mānoa
  57. Lee NH. 2017. The vitality or endangerment of some nonindigenous languages: a response to Mufwene. Language 93:4e234–42
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Lee NH. 2018. Contact languages around the world and their levels of endangerment. Lang. Doc. Conserv. 12:53–79
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Lee NH. 2019. Peranakans in Singapore: responses to language endangerment and documentation. Lang. Doc. Conserv. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Lee NH, Van Way J 2016. Assessing levels of endangerment in the Catalogue of Endangered Languages (ELCat) using the Language Endangerment Index (LEI). Lang. Soc. 45:2271–92
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Lee NH, Van Way J 2018a. Assessing degrees of endangerment. See Rehg & Campbell 2018 48–65
  62. Lee NH, Van Way J 2018b. The Language Endangerment Index. See Campbell & Belew 2018 66–78
  63. Lim L, Ansaldo U. 2006. Keeping Kirinda vital: the endangerment–empowerment dilemma in the documentation of Sri Lanka Malay. ACLC Work. Pap. 1:51–66
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Lim L, Ansaldo U. 2015. Contact and shift. Languages in Contact129–58 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Markey TL. 1982. Afrikaans: creole or non-creole?. Z. Dialektol. Linguist. 49:169–207
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Matras Y. 2009. Language Contact Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  67. McConvell P, Meakins F. 2005. Gurindji Kriol: a mixed language emerges from code-switching. Aust. J. Linguist. 25:19–30
    [Google Scholar]
  68. McWhorter J. 2005. Defining Creole Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  69. Meakins F. 2008. Land, language and identity: the socio-political origins of Gurindji Kriol. Social Lives in Languages M Meyerhoff, N Nagy 69–94 Amsterdam: John Benjamins
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Meakins F. 2009. Documenting Gurindji Kriol, an Australian mixed language Endangered Languages Archive, SOAS Univ London, London: https://elar.soas.ac.uk/Collection/MPI171874
  71. Michaelis SM, Maurer P, Haspelmath M, Huber M 2013. The Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online Leipzig, Ger.: Max Planck Inst. Evol. Anthropol http://apics-online.info
  72. Moore D. 2007. Endangered languages of lowland tropical South America. See Brenzinger 2007 29–58
  73. Mous M. 2003. The Making of a Mixed Language: The Case of Ma'a/Mbugu Amsterdam: John Benjamins
  74. Mufwene SS. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  75. Mufwene SS. 2003. Language endangerment: What have pride and prestige got to do with it?. When Languages Collide: Perspectives on Language Conflict, Language Competition, and Language Coexistence B Joseph, J Destefano, NG Jacobs, I Lehiste 324–46 Columbus: Ohio State Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Mufwene SS. 2015. Chinook jargon. Encyclopædia Britannica https://www.britannica.com/topic/Chinook-Jargon
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Mufwene SS. 2017. Language vitality: the weak theoretical underpinnings of what can be an exciting research area. Language 93:4e202–23
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Mühleisen S. 2013. Structure dataset 6: Trinidad English Creole. See Michaelis, Maurer, Haspelmath, & Huber 2013. http://apics-online.info/contributions/6
  79. Mühlhäusler P. 2003. Language endangerment and language revival. J. Socioling. 7:2232–45
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Nettle D, Romaine S. 2000. Vanishing Voices: The Extinction of the World's Languages Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  81. Nirmala M. 2000. Buck up, poor English reflects badly on us: PM. Straits Times Apr. 30 4
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Nombembe P. 2017. Afrikaans sentenced to death: English now sole official court language. Sunday Times Apr. 16. http://www.timeslive.co.za/sundaytimes/stnews/2017/04/16/Afrikaans-sentenced-to-death-English-now-sole-official-court-language
    [Google Scholar]
  83. O'Shannessy C. 2012. Language contact and change in endangered languages. The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages PK Austin, J Sallabank 78–99 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Pillai S. 2011. Malacca Portuguese Creole: a Portuguese-based Creole Endangered Languages Archive, SOAS Univ London, London: https://elar.soas.ac.uk/Collection/MPI130545
  85. Pillai S, Phillip A, Soh W-Y 2017. Revitalizing Malacca Portuguese Creole. Handbook of Research and Practice in Heritage Language Education PP Trifonas, T Aravossitas 801–17 Cham, Switz.: Springer Int. Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Queen R, O'Shannessy C. 2014. Documentation and acquisition of Light Warlpiri and Warlpiri. National Science Foundation Abstr.). https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1348013
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Rehg K, Campbell L 2018. The Oxford Handbook of Endangered Languages Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  88. Rickford JR. 1986. The need for new approaches to social class analysis in sociolinguistics. Lang. Commun. 6:3215–21
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Russell B, Campbell L. 2018. Language classification and cataloguing endangered languages. See Campbell & Belew 2018 23–48
  90. Sallabank J. 2013. Attitudes Towards Endangered Languages: Identities and Policies Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  91. Sammons O. 2011. Documenting Michif variation Endangered Languages Archive, SOAS Univ London, London: https://elar.soas.ac.uk/Collection/MPI971102
  92. Sandman E. 2016. A grammar of Wuntun PhD Thesis, Univ Helsinki, Finland:
  93. Sankar L, Neo DHJ, De Rycker A 2016. Chinese culture and customs in Peranakan funerals in Malaysia and Singapore. SEARCH J. South East Asia Res. Cent. Commun. Humanit. 8:117–36
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Shahyd K. 2017. Black languages matter: Louisiana Creole is critically endangered. LinkedIn Dec. 23. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/black-languages-matter-louisiana-creole-critically-khalil-shahyd
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Smith I, Pauuw S, Hussainmiya B 2004. Sri Lanka Malay: the state of the art. Yearbook of South Asian Languages 2004 R Singh 197–215 Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Stewart J. 2013. Stories and Traditions from Pijal: Told in Media Lengua North Charleston, SC: CreateSpace
  97. Swadesh M. 1948. Sociological notes on obsolescent languages. Int. J. Am. Linguist. 14:226–35
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Tan CB. 1979. Baba and Nyonya: a study of the ethnic identity of the Chinese Peranakan in Malacca PhD Thesis, Cornell Univ Ithaca, NY:
  99. Thomason SG. 1997. A typology of contact languages. The Structure and Status of Pidgins and Creoles, Vol. 19 AK Spears, D Winford 71–90 Amsterdam: John Benjamins
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Thomason SG. 2015. Endangered Languages: An Introduction Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  101. Thomason SG. 2018. Language contact and language endangerment. See Rehg & Campbell 2018 66–81
  102. Thomason SG, Kaufman T. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics Berkeley/Los Angeles: Univ. Calif. Press
  103. Tsunoda T. 2005. Language Endangerment and Language Revitalization: An Introduction Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
  104. UNESCO 2008. Andean cosmovision of the Kallawaya. UNESCO https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/andean-cosmovision-of-the-kallawaya-00048
    [Google Scholar]
  105. [Google Scholar]
  106. Valdman A. 1987. Le cycle vital créole et la standardisation du créole haïtien. Etud. Créoles 10:107–25
    [Google Scholar]
  107. van Driem G. 2007. Endangered languages of South Asia. See Brenzinger 2007 303–41
  108. van Sluijs R. 2013. Structure dataset 27: Negerhollands. See Michaelis, Maurer, Haspelmath, & Huber 2013. http://apics-online.info/contributions/27
  109. Vellupillai V. 2015. Pidgins, Creoles and Mixed Languages Amsterdam: John Benjamins
  110. Whalen DH, Simons GF. 2012. Endangered language families. Language 88:1155–73
    [Google Scholar]
  111. Williamson K. 1997. Language endangerment in southern Nigeria Paper presented at the Symposium on Language Endangerment in Africa Leipzig, Ger: July 27–Aug 3
  112. Winford D. 2003. An Introduction to Contact Linguistics Oxford, UK: Blackwell
  113. Wong KM. 2019. Kodrah Kristang: the initiative to revitalize the Kristang language in Singapore. J. Lang. Doc. Conserv. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  114. Wurm S. 2007. Threatened languages in the Western Pacific area. See Brenzinger 2007 374–90
  115. Yager J, Burenhult N. 2017. Jedek: a newly discovered Aslian variety of Malaysia. Linguist. Typol. 21:3493–545
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011619-030427
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011619-030427
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error