1932

Abstract

Implementation science focuses on enhancing the widespread uptake of evidence-based interventions into routine practice to improve population health. However, optimizing implementation science to promote health equity in domestic and global resource-limited settings requires considering historical and sociopolitical processes (e.g., colonization, structural racism) and centering in local sociocultural and indigenous cultures and values. This review weaves together principles of decolonization and antiracism to inform critical and reflexive perspectives on partnerships that incorporate a focus on implementation science, with the goal of making progress toward global health equity. From an implementation science perspective, wesynthesize examples of public health evidence-based interventions, strategies, and outcomes applied in global settings that are promising for health equity, alongside a critical examination of partnerships, context, and frameworks operationalized in these studies. We conclude with key future directions to optimize the application of implementation science with a justice orientation to promote global health equity.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-060922-034822
2024-05-20
2024-05-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/publhealth/45/1/annurev-publhealth-060922-034822.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-060922-034822&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Abimbola S, Pai M. 2020.. Will global health survive its decolonisation?. Lancet 396:(10263):162728
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  2. 2.
    Adkins-Jackson PB, Vázquez E, Henry-Ala FK, Ison JM, Cheney A, et al. 2023.. The role of anti-racist community-partnered praxis in implementing restorative circles within marginalized communities in Southern California During the COVID-19 pandemic. . Health Promot. Pract. 24:(2):23243
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  3. 3.
    Adsul P, Chambers D, Brandt HM, Fernandez ME, Ramanadhan S, et al. 2022.. Grounding implementation science in health equity for cancer prevention and control. . Implement. Sci. Commun. 3:(1):56
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  4. 4.
    Adsul P, Hariprasad R, Lott BE, Varon ML. 2022.. Advancing the science of implementation for resource-limited settings through bidirectional learning around cervical cancer screening. . Ethn. Dis. 32:(4):26974
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  5. 5.
    Adsul P, Islam J, Chebli P, Kranick J, Nash S, et al. 2023.. Identifying research practices toward achieving health equity principles within the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network. . Cancer Causes Control 34:(Suppl. 1):1521
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  6. 6.
    Airhihenbuwa CO. 1990.. A conceptual model for culturally appropriate health education programs in developing countries. . Int. Q. Community Health Educ. 11:(1):5362
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  7. 7.
    Airhihenbuwa CO. 1999.. Of culture and multiverse: renouncing “the universal truth” in health. . J. Health Educ. 30:(5):26773
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  8. 8.
    Airhihenbuwa CO. 2007.. Healing Our Differences: The Crisis of Global Health and the Politics of Identity. Washington, DC:: Rowman & Littlefield
  9. 9.
    Airhihenbuwa CO, Tseng T-S, Sutton VD, Price L. 2021.. Global perspectives on improving chronic disease prevention and management in diverse settings. . Prev. Chronic Dis. 18::E33
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  10. 10.
    Alvidrez J, Nápoles AM, Bernal G, Lloyd J, Cargill V, et al. 2019.. Building the evidence base to inform planned intervention adaptations by practitioners serving health disparity populations. . Am. J. Public Health 109:(S1):S94101
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  11. 11.
    Alwy Al-Beity FM, Baker U, Kakoko D, Hanson C, Pembe AB. 2022.. Health workers’ experiences of implementation of Helping Mothers Survive Bleeding after Birth training in Tanzania: a process evaluation using the i-PARIHS framework. . BMC Health Serv. Res. 22:(1):1240
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  12. 12.
    Bauer MS, Damschroder L, Hagedorn H, Smith J, Kilbourne AM. 2015.. An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist. . BMC Psychol. 3:(1):32
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  13. 13.
    Baumann AA, Cabassa LJ. 2020.. Reframing implementation science to address inequities in healthcare delivery. . BMC Health Serv. Res. 20:(1):190
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  14. 14.
    Bécares L, Nazroo J, Kelly Y. 2015.. A longitudinal examination of maternal, family, and area-level experiences of racism on children's socioemotional development: patterns and possible explanations. . Soc. Sci. Med. 142::12835
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  15. 15.
    Beecroft B, Sturke R, Neta G, Ramaswamy R. 2022.. The “case” for case studies: why we need high-quality examples of global implementation research. . Implement. Sci. Commun. 3:(1):15
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  16. 16.
    Bergström A, Peterson S, Namusoko S, Waiswa P, Wallin L. 2012.. Knowledge translation in Uganda: a qualitative study of Ugandan midwives’ and managers’ perceived relevance of the sub-elements of the context cornerstone in the PARIHS framework. . Implement. Sci. 7:(1):117
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  17. 17.
    Binagwaho A, Ngarambe B, Mathewos K. 2022.. Eliminating the white supremacy mindset from global health education. . Ann. Glob. Health 88:(1):32
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  18. 18.
    Blue Bird Jernigan V, D'Amico EJ, Keawe'aimoku Kaholokula J. 2020.. Prevention research with Indigenous communities to expedite dissemination and implementation efforts. . Prev. Sci. 21:(Suppl. 1):7482
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  19. 19.
    Booth A, Moore G, Flemming K, Garside R, Rollins N, et al. 2019.. Taking account of context in systematic reviews and guidelines considering a complexity perspective. . BMJ Glob. Health 4:(Suppl. 1):e000840
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  20. 20.
    Bowleg L. 2017.. Intersectionality: an underutilized but essential theoretical framework for social psychology. . In The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Social Psychology, ed. B Gough, pp. 50729. New York:: Palgrave Macmillan/Springer Nat.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 21.
    Bowleg L. 2020.. We're not all in this together: on COVID-19, intersectionality, and structural inequality. . Am. J. Public Health 110:(7):917
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  22. 22.
    Boyce CA, Barfield W, Curry J, Shero S, Green Parker M, et al. 2019.. Building the next generation of implementation science careers to advance health equity. . Ethn. Dis. 29:(Suppl. 1):7782
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  23. 23.
    Bretthauer M, Kalager M. 2020.. Disparities in preventive health services: targeting minorities and majorities. . Ann. Intern. Med. 172:(4):28788
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  24. 24.
    Broutet N, Jeronimo J, Kumar S, Almonte M, Murillo R, et al. 2022.. Implementation research to accelerate scale-up of national screen and treat strategies towards the elimination of cervical cancer. . Prev. Med. 155::106906
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  25. 25.
    Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, eds. 2017.. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice. New York:: Oxford Univ. Press
  26. 26.
    Brownson RC, Kumanyika SK, Kreuter MW, Haire-Joshu D. 2021.. Implementation science should give higher priority to health equity. . Implement. Sci. 16:(1):28
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  27. 27.
    Büyüm AM, Kenney C, Koris A, Mkumba L, Raveendran Y. 2020.. Decolonising global health: if not now, when?. BMJ Glob. Health 5:(8):e003394
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  28. 28.
    Cabassa LJ, Baumann AA. 2013.. A two-way street: bridging implementation science and cultural adaptations of mental health treatments. . Implement. Sci. 8:(1):90
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  29. 29.
    Chatfield K, Biernacki O, Schroeder D, Cavallaro F, Cook J, et al. 2018.. Research with, not about, communities: ethical guidance towards empowerment in collaborative research. Rep., TRUST Proj., n.p. https://www.globalcodeofconduct.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/TRUST-Community-Participation-in-Research.pdf
  30. 30.
    Chu KM, Weiser TG. 2021.. Real-world implementation challenges in low-resource settings. . Lancet Glob. Health 9:(10):e134142
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  31. 31.
    Colditz GA, Emmons KM. 2018.. Accelerating the pace of cancer prevention—right now. . Cancer Prev. Res. 11:(4):17184
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  32. 32.
    Contractor SQ, Dasgupta J. 2022.. Is decolonisation sufficient?. BMJ Glob. Health 7:(12):e011564
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  33. 33.
    Crable EL, Lengnick-Hall R, Stadnick NA, Moullin JC, Aarons GA. 2022.. Where is “policy” in dissemination and implementation science? Recommendations to advance theories, models, and frameworks: EPIS as a case example. . Implement. Sci. 17:(1):80
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  34. 34.
    Damschroder LJ. 2020.. Clarity out of chaos: use of theory in implementation research. . Psychiatry Res. 283::112461
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  35. 35.
    Damschroder LJ, Reardon CM, Widerquist MAO, Lowery J. 2022.. The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback. . Implement. Sci. 17:(1):75
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  36. 36.
    Dutta MJ. 2007.. Communicating about culture and health: theorizing culture-centered and cultural sensitivity approaches. . Commun. Theory 17:(3):30428
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  37. 37.
    Eccles MP, Mittman BS. 2006.. Welcome to Implementation Science. . Implement. Sci. 1::1
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  38. 38.
    Eichbaum QG, Adams LV, Evert J, Ho M-J, Semali IA, van Schalkwyk SC. 2021.. Decolonizing global health education: rethinking institutional partnerships and approaches. . Acad. Med. 96:(3):32935
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  39. 39.
    Erondu NA, Mofokeng T, Kavanagh MM, Matache M, Bosha SL. 2023.. Towards anti-racist policies and strategies to reduce poor health outcomes in racialised communities: introducing the O'Neill-Lancet Commission on Racism, Structural Discrimination, and Global Health. . Lancet 401::183436
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  40. 40.
    Eshun-Wilson I, Ford N, Le Tourneau N, Baral S, Schwartz S, et al. 2022.. A Living Database of HIV Implementation Research (LIVE Project): protocol for rapid living reviews. . JMIR Res. Protoc. 11:(10):e37070
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  41. 41.
    Fanon F. 2004. ( 1961.). The Wretched of the Earth, transl. R Philcox . New York:: Grove Press
  42. 42.
    Fergus CA. 2022.. Power across the global health landscape: a network analysis of development assistance 1990–2015. . Health Policy Plan. 37:(6):77990
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  43. 43.
    Finkel ML, Temmermann M, Suleman F, Barry M, Salm M, et al. 2022.. What do global health practitioners think about decolonizing global health?. Ann. Glob. Health 88:(1):61
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  44. 44.
    Fleming PJ, Stone LC, Creary MS, Greene-Moton E, Israel BA, et al. 2023.. Antiracism and community-based participatory research: synergies, challenges, and opportunities. . Am. J. Public Health 113:(1):7078
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  45. 45.
    Frimpong S, Seidu M, Hilton SK. 2021.. Using PARIHS framework to design a community-based COVID-19 intervention in rural Ghana. . medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.30.21254353
  46. 46.
    Gaias LM, Arnold KT, Liu FF, Pullmann MD, Duong MT, Lyon AR. 2022.. Adapting strategies to promote implementation reach and equity (ASPIRE) in school mental health services. . Psychol. Sch. 59:(12):247185
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  47. 47.
    Glasgow RE, Harden SM, Gaglio B, Rabin B, Smith ML, et al. 2019.. RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework: adapting to new science and practice with a 20-year review. . Front. Public Health 7::64
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  48. 48.
    Glasgow RE, Vinson C, Chambers D, Khoury MJ, Kaplan RM, Hunter C. 2012.. National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: current and future directions. . Am. J. Public Health 102:(7):127481
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  49. 49.
    Gottschlich A, Payne BA, Trawin J, Albert A, Jeronimo J, et al. 2023.. Community-integrated self-collected HPV-based cervix screening in a low-resource rural setting: a pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial. . Nat. Med. 29:(4):92735
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  50. 50.
    Green LW. 2008.. Making research relevant: If it is an evidence-based practice, where's the practice-based evidence?. Fam. Pract. 25:(Suppl. 1):i2024
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  51. 51.
    Green LW, Allegrante JP. 2020.. Practice-based evidence and the need for more diverse methods and sources in epidemiology, public health and health promotion. . Am. J. Health Promot. 34:(8):94648
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  52. 52.
    Griffith DM, Mason M, Yonas M, Eng E, Jeffries V, et al. 2007.. Dismantling institutional racism: theory and action. . Am. J. Community Psychol. 39:(3–4):38192
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  53. 53.
    Griffith DM, Semlow AR. 2020.. Art, antiracism and health equity: “Don't ask me why, as me how!. Ethn. Dis. 30:(3):37380
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  54. 54.
    Griffith DM, Shelton RC, Kegler M. 2017.. Advancing the science of qualitative research to promote health equity. . Health Educ. Behav. 44:(5):67376
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  55. 55.
    Griffith DM, Umeukeje EM. 2022.. Navigating to kidney health equity. . J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 33:(7):124244
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  56. 56.
    Gyamfi J, Iwelunmor J, Patel S, Irazola V, Aifah A, et al. 2023.. Implementation outcomes and strategies for delivering evidence-based hypertension interventions in lower-middle-income countries: evidence from a multi-country consortium for hypertension control. . PLOS ONE 18:(5):e0286204
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  57. 57.
    Haines ER, Kirk MA, Lux L, Smitherman AB, Powell BJ, et al. 2022.. Ethnography and user-centered design to inform context-driven implementation. . Transl. Behav. Med. 12:(1):ibab077
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  58. 58.
    Harvey G, Kitson A. 2016.. PARIHS revisited: from heuristic to integrated framework for the successful implementation of knowledge into practice. . Implement. Sci. 11:(1):33
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  59. 59.
    Helfrich CD, Hartmann CW, Parikh TJ, Au DH. 2019.. Promoting health equity through de-implementation research. . Ethn. Dis. 29:(Suppl. 1):9396
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  60. 60.
    Henrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A. 2010.. Beyond WEIRD: towards a broad-based behavioral science. . Behav. Brain Sci. 33:(2–3):11135
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  61. 61.
    Holt CL, Chambers DA. 2017.. Opportunities and challenges in conducting community-engaged dissemination/implementation research. . Transl. Behav. Med. 7:(3):38992
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  62. 62.
    Iwelunmor J. 2022.. The truth about decolonising global health worth spreading. . Lancet 399:(10338):186364
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  63. 63.
    Kamanda A, Embleton L, Ayuku D, Atwoli L, Gisore P, et al. 2013.. Harnessing the power of the grassroots to conduct public health research in sub-Saharan Africa: a case study from western Kenya in the adaptation of community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches. . BMC Public Health 13:(1):91
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  64. 64.
    Kapilashrami A, Hankivsky O. 2018.. Intersectionality and why it matters to global health. . Lancet 391:(10140):258991
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  65. 65.
    Koczwara B, Birken SA, Perry CK, Cragun D, Zullig LL, et al. 2016.. How context matters: a dissemination and implementation primer for global oncologists. . J. Glob. Oncol. 2:(2):5155
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  66. 66.
    Koh S, Lee M, Brotzman LE, Shelton RC. 2020.. An orientation for new researchers to key domains, processes, and resources in implementation science. . Transl. Behav. Med. 10:(1):17985
    [Google Scholar]
  67. 67.
    Kwete X, Tang K, Chen L, Ren R, Chen Q, et al. 2022.. Decolonizing global health: What should be the target of this movement and where does it lead us?. Glob Health Res. Policy 7:(1):3
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  68. 68.
    Kyobutungi C, Gitahi G, Wangari M-C, Siema P, Gitau E, et al. 2023.. From vaccine to visa apartheid, how anti-Blackness persists in global health. . PLOS Glob. Public Health 3:(2):e0001663
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  69. 69.
    Lawrence DS, Hirsch LA. 2020.. Decolonising global health: transnational research partnerships under the spotlight. . Int. Health 12:(6):51823
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  70. 70.
    Leeman J, Boisson A, Go V. 2022.. Scaling up public health interventions: engaging partners across multiple levels. . Annu. Rev. Public Health 43::15571
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  71. 71.
    Madon T, Hofman KJ, Kupfer L, Glass RI. 2007.. Public health. Implementation science. . Science 318:(5857):172829
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  72. 72.
    Mahendradhata Y, Kalbarczyk A. 2021.. Prioritizing knowledge translation in low- and middle-income countries to support pandemic response and preparedness. . Health Res. Policy Sys. 19:(1):5
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  73. 73.
    Malhotra A, Thompson RR, Kagoya F, Masiye F, Mbewe P, et al. 2022.. Economic evaluation of implementation science outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review. . Implement. Sci. 17:(1):76
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  74. 74.
    Malla C, Aylward P, Ward P. 2018.. Knowledge translation for public health in low- and middle-income countries: a critical interpretive synthesis. . Glob. Health Res. Policy 3:(1):29
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  75. 75.
    McKay MM, Sensoy Bahar O, Ssewamala FM. 2020.. Implementation science in global health settings: collaborating with governmental & community partners in Uganda. . Psychiatry Res. 283::112585
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  76. 76.
    McKibbon KA, Lokker C, Wilczynski NL, Ciliska D, Dobbins M, et al. 2010.. A cross-sectional study of the number and frequency of terms used to refer to knowledge translation in a body of health literature in 2006: a Tower of Babel?. Implement. Sci. 5:(1):16
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  77. 77.
    Means AR, Kemp CG, Gwayi-Chore M-C, Gimbel S, Soi C, et al. 2020.. Evaluating and optimizing the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) for use in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. . Implement. Sci. 15:(1):17
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  78. 78.
    Montenegro CR, Bernales M, Gonzalez-Aguero M. 2020.. Teaching global health from the south: challenges and proposals. . Crit. Public Health 30:(2):12729
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  79. 79.
    Montenegro CR, Ortega F. 2020.. Thinking beyond implementation: context and culture in global mental health. . BMJ Glob. Health 5:(12):e004539
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  80. 80.
    NIH (Natl. Inst. Health). 2022.. Dissemination and implementation research in health (R01 Clinical Trial Optional). PAR-22–105, NIH, Bethesda, MD:. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-22-105.html
  81. 81.
    Nilsen P. 2015.. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. . Implement. Sci. 10:(1):53
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  82. 82.
    Oetzel J, Scott N, Hudson M, Masters-Awatere B, Rarere M, et al. 2017.. Implementation framework for chronic disease intervention effectiveness in Māori and other indigenous communities. . Glob. Health 13:(1):69
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  83. 83.
    Oh A, Abazeed A, Chambers DA. 2021.. Policy implementation science to advance population health: the potential for learning health policy systems. . Front. Public Health 9::681602
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  84. 84.
    Ojo T, Kabasele L, Boyd B, Enechukwu S, Ryan N, et al. 2021.. The role of implementation science in advancing resource generation for health interventions in low- and middle-income countries. . Health Serv. Insights 14::1178632921999652
    [Google Scholar]
  85. 85.
    Olusanya BO. 2021.. Systemic racism in global health: a personal reflection. . Lancet Glob. Health 9:(8):e105152
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  86. 86.
    Parascandola M, Neta G, Salloum RG, Shelley D, Rositch AF. 2022.. Role of local evidence in transferring evidence-based interventions to low- and middle-income country settings: application to global cancer prevention and control. . JCO Glob. Oncol. 8::e2200054
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  87. 87.
    Peterson HB, Dube Q, Lawn JE, Haidar J, Bagenal J, et al. 2023.. Achieving justice in implementation: the Lancet Commission on Evidence-Based Implementation in Global Health. . Lancet 402::16870
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  88. 88.
    Phelan JC, Link BG. 2015.. Is racism a fundamental cause of inequalities in health?. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 41::31130
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  89. 89.
    Plamondon KM, Brisbois B, Dubent L, Larson CP. 2021.. Assessing how global health partnerships function: an equity-informed critical interpretive synthesis. . Glob. Health 17:(1):73
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  90. 90.
    Popay J, Whitehead M, Ponsford R, Egan M, Mead R. 2021.. Power, control, communities and health inequalities I: theories, concepts and analytical frameworks. . Health Promot. Int. 36:(5):125363
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  91. 91.
    Powell BJ, Fernandez ME, Williams NJ, Aarons GA, Beidas RS, et al. 2019.. Enhancing the impact of implementation strategies in healthcare: a research agenda. . Front. Public Health 7::3
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  92. 92.
    Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Chinman MJ, Damschroder LJ, Smith JL, et al. 2015.. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. . Implement. Sci. 10:(1):21
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  93. 93.
    Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, et al. 2011.. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. . Adm. Policy Ment. Health 38:(2):6576
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  94. 94.
    Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC. 2013.. Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. . Implement. Sci. 8:(1):139
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  95. 95.
    Ramanadhan S, Davis MM, Armstrong R, Baquero B, Ko LK, et al. 2018.. Participatory implementation science to increase the impact of evidence-based cancer prevention and control. . Cancer Causes Control 29:(3):36369
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  96. 96.
    Ridde V. 2016.. Need for more and better implementation science in global health. . BMJ Glob. Health 1:(2):e000115
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  97. 97.
    Rubin R. 2023.. It takes an average of 17 years for evidence to change practice—the burgeoning field of implementation science seeks to speed things up. . JAMA 329:(16):133336
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  98. 98.
    Sachs JD, Karim SSA, Aknin L, Allen J, Brosbøl K, et al. 2022.. The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic. . Lancet 400:(10359):122480
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  99. 99.
    Samarasekera U. 2022.. Desmond Jumbam: challenging power dynamics in global health. . Lancet 400:(10368):2039
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  100. 100.
    Santesso N, Tugwell P. 2006.. Knowledge translation in developing countries. . J. Contin. Educ. Health Prof. 26:(1):8796
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  101. 101.
    Sariola S. 2020.. Intersectionality and community engagement: Can solidarity alone solve power differences in global health research?. Am. J. Bioeth. 20:(5):5759
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  102. 102.
    Sayeed S, Taylor L. 2020.. Institutionalising global health: a call for ethical reflection. . BMJ Glob. Health 5:(9):e003353
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  103. 103.
    Shelton RC, Adsul P, Oh A. 2021.. Recommendations for addressing structural racism in implementation science: a call to the field. . Ethn. Dis. 31:(Suppl. 1):35764
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  104. 104.
    Shelton RC, Adsul P, Oh A, Moise N, Griffith DM. 2021.. Application of an antiracism lens in the field of implementation science (IS): recommendations for reframing implementation research with a focus on justice and racial equity. . Implement. Res. Pract. 2::26334895211049480
    [Google Scholar]
  105. 105.
    Shelton RC, Brotzman LE, Johnson D, Erwin D. 2021.. Trust and mistrust in shaping adaptation and de-implementation in the context of changing screening guidelines. . Ethn. Dis. 31:(1):11932
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  106. 106.
    Shelton RC, Chambers DA, Glasgow RE. 2020.. An extension of RE-AIM to enhance sustainability: addressing dynamic context and promoting health equity over time. . Front. Public Health 8::134
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  107. 107.
    Shelton RC, Lee M. 2019.. Sustaining evidence-based interventions and policies: recent innovations and future directions in implementation science. . Am. J. Public Health 109:(S2):S13234
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  108. 108.
    Shelton RC, Philbin MM, Ramanadhan S. 2022.. Qualitative research methods in chronic disease: introduction and opportunities to promote health equity. . Annu. Rev. Public Health 43::3757
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  109. 109.
    Shiffman J. 2015.. Global health as a field of power relations: a response to recent commentaries. . Int. J. Health Policy Manag. 4:(7):49799
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  110. 110.
    Snell-Rood C, Jaramillo ET, Hamilton AB, Raskin SE, Nicosia FM, Willging C. 2021.. Advancing health equity through a theoretically critical implementation science. . Transl. Behav. Med. 11:(8):161725
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  111. 111.
    Sohn H, Tucker A, Ferguson O, Gomes I, Dowdy D. 2020.. Costing the implementation of public health interventions in resource-limited settings: a conceptual framework. . Implement. Sci. 15:(1):86
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  112. 112.
    Supplee L, Boaz A, Metz A. 2023.. Learning across contexts: bringing together research on research use and implementation science. Rep., William T. Grant Found., New York:. https://wtgrantfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Supplee-Boaz-Metz_WTG-Digest-8.pdf
  113. 113.
    Theobald S, Brandes N, Gyapong M, El-Saharty S, Proctor E, et al. 2018.. Implementation research: new imperatives and opportunities in global health. . Lancet 392:(10160):221428
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  114. 114.
    Univ. Colo. Denver. 2023.. Health equity. . Dissemination and Implementation Models in Health. https://dissemination-implementation.org/special-topics/health-equity/
    [Google Scholar]
  115. 115.
    van Zyl C, Badenhorst M, Hanekom S, Heine M. 2021.. Unravelling ‘low-resource settings’: a systematic scoping review with qualitative content analysis. . BMJ Glob. Health 6:(6):e005190
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  116. 116.
    Villalobos Dintrans P, Bossert TJ, Sherry J, Kruk ME. 2019.. A synthesis of implementation science frameworks and application to global health gaps. . Glob. Health Res. Policy 4:(1):25
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  117. 117.
    Vos T, Lim SS, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abbasi M, et al. 2020.. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. . Lancet 396:(10258):120422
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  118. 118.
    Wa Thiong'o N. 1992.. Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature. Nairobi:: East Afr. Publ.
  119. 119.
    Wallerstein N, Duran B, Oetzel JG, Minkler M. 2017.. Community-Based Participatory Research for Health: Advancing Social and Health Equity. Hoboken, NJ:: Wiley
  120. 120.
    Waltz TJ, Powell BJ, Matthieu MM, Damschroder LJ, Chinman MJ, et al. 2015.. Use of concept mapping to characterize relationships among implementation strategies and assess their feasibility and importance: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study. . Implement. Sci. 10:(1):109
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  121. 121.
    Warne D. 2005.. Traditional perspectives on child and family health. . Paediatr. Child Health 10:(9):54244
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  122. 122.
    Welch V, Ueffing E, Tugwell P. 2009.. Knowledge translation: an opportunity to reduce global health inequalities. . J. Int. Dev. 21:(8):106682
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  123. 123.
    Wells K, Jones L. 2009.. Commentary: “research” in community-partnered, participatory research. . JAMA 302:(3):32021
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  124. 124.
    WHO (World Health Organ.). 2020.. Life tables by country. Life Tables, Glob. Health Obs., updated Dec. 6. https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/gho-ghe-life-tables-by-country
  125. 125.
    WHO (World Health Organ.). 2023.. Health equity—global.. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/health-topics/health-equity#tab=tab_1
    [Google Scholar]
  126. 126.
    Wolfenden L, Hawe P, Rychetnik L, Sutherland R, Barnes C, et al. 2022.. A call to action: More collaborative implementation research is needed to prevent chronic disease. . Austr. N. Z. J. Public Health 46:(5):54953
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  127. 127.
    Wolff T, Minkler M, Wolfe SM, Berkowitz B, Bowen L, et al. 2017.. Collaborating for equity and justice: moving beyond collective impact. . Nonprofit Q. Jan. 9. https://nonprofitquarterly.org/collaborating-equity-justice-moving-beyond-collective-impact/
    [Google Scholar]
  128. 128.
    Woodward EN, Ball IA. 2023.. Perspectives on learning to practice reflexivity while engaging communities in implementation science. . Front. Health Serv. 2::1070444
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  129. 129.
    Yancey A (Toni), Glenn BA, Ford CL, Bell-Lewis L. 2017.. Dissemination and implementation research among racial/ethnic minority and other vulnerable populations. . See Ref. 25 , pp. 44970
  130. 130.
    Yapa HM, Bärnighausen T. 2018.. Implementation science in resource-poor countries and communities. . Implement. Sci. 13:(1):154
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  131. 131.
    Yengde S. 2019.. Caste Matters. Delhi:: Penguin Random House India Private Limited
  132. 132.
    Zaman M, Afridi G, Ohly H, McArdle HJ, Lowe NM. 2020.. Equitable partnerships in global health research. . Nat. Food 1:(12):76061
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-060922-034822
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-060922-034822
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error