1932

Abstract

In this review, I examine the recent turn to design in anthropology in three different configurations: anthropology of design, anthropology for design, and design for anthropology. Although these three configurations represent different cuts in a complex set of relations between these two disciplines, I have chosen to discuss them together because they all represent—though not always obviously so—attempts to contend with the moral implications of humans intervening in the lives of other humans. One goal of this article is to specify and evaluate a long-standing but underarticulated regard for design and designed things in anthropology while also offering a framework for critically engaging anthropology's relationship with design in its multiple configurations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-100224
2016-10-21
2024-07-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/anthro/45/1/annurev-anthro-102215-100224.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-100224&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Agha A. 2011. Commodity registers. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 21:122–53 [Google Scholar]
  2. Agha A. 2015. Tropes of branding in forms of life. Signs Soc 3:S1S174–94 [Google Scholar]
  3. Alexander C. 1964. Notes on the Synthesis of Form Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  4. Anusas M, Ingold T. 2013. Designing environmental relations: from opacity to textility. Des. Issues 29:458–69 [Google Scholar]
  5. Appadurai A. 1986. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  6. Appadurai A. 2013. The Future as Cultural Fact: Essays on the Global Condition New York: Verso [Google Scholar]
  7. Attfield J. 2000. Wild Things: Material Culture and Everyday Life Oxford, UK: Berg [Google Scholar]
  8. Bahloul J. 1996. The Architecture of Memory: A Jewish-Muslim Household in Colonial Algeria, 1937–1962 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  9. Banham R. 1967. Theory and Design in the First Machine Age New York: Praeger [Google Scholar]
  10. Barab SA, Thomas MK, Dodge T, Squire K, Newell M. 2004. Critical design ethnography: designing for change. Anthropol. Educ. Q. 35:2254–68 [Google Scholar]
  11. Barthes R. 1990. The Fashion System Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  12. Bauman Z. 2004. Wasted Lives: Modernity and Its Outcasts Cambridge, UK: Polity [Google Scholar]
  13. Benedict R. 1934. Patterns of Culture Boston: Houghton Mifflin [Google Scholar]
  14. Berdahl D. 1999. ‘(N)Ostalgie’ for the present: memory, longing, and East German things. Ethnos 64:2192–211 [Google Scholar]
  15. Boas F. 1908. Decorative designs of Alaskan needlecases: a study in the history of conventional designs, based on materials in the U. S. National Museum. Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus. 34:1616321–44 [Google Scholar]
  16. Boas F. 1955. Primitive Art New York: Dover [Google Scholar]
  17. Bourdieu P. 1990. The Kabyle House or the world reversed. The Logic of Practice271–83 Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  18. Bristol KG. 1991. The Pruitt-Igoe myth. J. Archit. Educ. 44:3163–71 [Google Scholar]
  19. Brown T. 2009. Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation New York: Harper Collins [Google Scholar]
  20. Bucciarelli LL. 1988. An ethnographic perspective on engineering design. Des. Stud. 9:3159–68 [Google Scholar]
  21. Buchli V. 2013. An Anthropology of Architecture London: Bloomsbury [Google Scholar]
  22. Button G. 2000. The ethnographic tradition and design. Des. Stud. 21:4319–32 [Google Scholar]
  23. Buur J, Sitorus L. 2007. Ethnography as design provocation. Ethnogr. Prax. Ind. Conf. Proc. 2007:1146–57 [Google Scholar]
  24. Carsten J, Hugh-Jones S. 1995. About the House: Levi-Strauss and Beyond Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  25. Cefkin M. 2010a. Business anthropology and the growth of corporate ethnography. See Cefkin 2010b 1–37 New York: Berghahn Books [Google Scholar]
  26. Cefkin M. 2010b. Ethnography and the Corporate Encounter: Reflections on Research in and of Corporations New York: Berghahn Books [Google Scholar]
  27. Chalfin B. 2014. Public things, excremental politics, and the infrastructure of bare life in Ghana's city of Tema. Am. Ethnol. 41:192–109 [Google Scholar]
  28. Clarke AJ. 1999. Tupperware: The Promise of Plastic in 1950s America Washington, DC: Smithson. Inst. Press [Google Scholar]
  29. Clarke AJ. 2010. Design Anthropology: Object Culture in the 21st Century New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
  30. Clarke BL. 1980. The argument from design. Am. J. Theol. Philos. 1:398–108 [Google Scholar]
  31. Corsín Jiménez A. 2014. The prototype: more than many and less than one. J. Cult. Econ. 7:4381–98 [Google Scholar]
  32. Crouch C. 1999. Modernism in Art, Design, and Architecture New York: St. Martin's Press [Google Scholar]
  33. Darwin C. 1958. The Autobiography of Charles Darwin 1908–1882 New York: Norton [Google Scholar]
  34. Dorst K. 2011. The core of “design thinking” and its application. Des. Stud. 32:6521–32 [Google Scholar]
  35. Douglas M, Isherwood B. 1996. The World of Goods New York: Routledge, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  36. Drazin A. 2013. The social life of concepts in design anthropology. See Gunn et al. 2013 33–50
  37. Duranti A. 2015. The Anthropology of Intentions: Language in a World of Others Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  38. Durham D. 1999. The predicament of dress: polyvalency and the ironies of cultural identity. Am. Ethnol. 26:2389–411 [Google Scholar]
  39. Eglash R. 1999. African Fractals: Modern Computing and Indigenous Design New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  40. Eicher JB. 2000. The anthropology of dress. Dress 27:159–70 [Google Scholar]
  41. El Or T. 2012. The soul of the Biblical sandal: on anthropology and style. Am. Anthropol. 114:3433–45 [Google Scholar]
  42. Escobar A. 2011. Sustainability: design for the pluriverse. Development 54:2137–40 [Google Scholar]
  43. Fehérváry K. 2009. Goods and states: the political logic of state-socialist material culture. Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist. 51:2426–59 [Google Scholar]
  44. Fehérváry K. 2013. Politics in Color and Concrete: Socialist Materialities and the Middle Class in Hungary Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  45. Flusser V. 1995. On the word design: an etymological essay. Des. Issues 11:350–53 [Google Scholar]
  46. Fortis P. 2010. The birth of design: a Kuna theory of body and personhood. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 16:480–95 [Google Scholar]
  47. Forty A. 1986. Objects of Desire: Design and Society from Wedgwood to IBM New York: Pantheon [Google Scholar]
  48. Foster RJ. 2007. The work of the new economy: consumers, brands, and value creation. Cult. Anthropol. 22:4707–31 [Google Scholar]
  49. Fuller M. 1988. Building power: Italy's colonial architecture and urbanism, 1923–1940. Cult. Anthropol. 3:4455–87 [Google Scholar]
  50. Garvey P. 2008. The Norwegian country cabin and functionalism: a tale of two modernities. Soc. Anthropol. 16:2203–20 [Google Scholar]
  51. Gatt C, Ingold T. 2013. From description to correspondence: anthropology in real time. See Gunn et al. 2013 139–58
  52. Gershon I. 2014. Selling your self in the United States. PoLAR: Polit. Leg. Anthropol. Rev. 37:2281–95 [Google Scholar]
  53. Graan A. 2013. Counterfeiting the nation? Skopje 2014 and the politics of nation branding in Macedonia. Cult. Anthropol. 28:1161–79 [Google Scholar]
  54. Graffam G. 2010. Design anthropology meets marketing. Anthropologica 52:1155–64 [Google Scholar]
  55. Greenbaum J, Kyng M. 1991. Introduction: Situated design. Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems1–24 Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum [Google Scholar]
  56. Gunn W, Donovan J. 2012a. Design and Anthropology London: Ashgate [Google Scholar]
  57. Gunn W, Donovan J. 2012b. Design anthropology: an introduction. See Gunn & Donovan 2012a 1–16
  58. Gunn W, Otto T, Smith RC. 2013. Design Anthropology: Theory and Practice London: Bloomsbury [Google Scholar]
  59. Halse J. 2013. Ethnographies of the possible. See Gunn et al. 2013 180–96
  60. Hansen KT. 2004. The world in dress: anthropological perspectives on clothing, fashion, and culture. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 33:369–92 [Google Scholar]
  61. Hayward S. 1998. “Good design is largely a matter of common sense”: questioning the meaning and ownership of a twentieth-century orthodoxy. J. Des. Hist. 11:3217–33 [Google Scholar]
  62. Herzfeld M. 2004. The Body Impolitic: Artisans and Artifice in the Global Hierarchy of Value Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  63. Holston J. 1989. The Modernist City: An Anthropological Critique of Brasilia Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  64. Humphrey C. 1988. No place like home in anthropology: the neglect of architecture. Anthropol. Today 4:116–18 [Google Scholar]
  65. Humphrey C. 2005. Ideology in infrastructure: architecture and Soviet imagination. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 11:139–58 [Google Scholar]
  66. Hunt J. 2010. Prototyping the social: temporality and speculative futures at the intersection of design and culture. See Clarke 2010 33–44
  67. Ingold T. 2007. Lines: A Brief History London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  68. Ingold T. 2012. Introduction: The perception of the user-producer. See Gunn & Donovan 2012a 19–33
  69. Ingold T. 2013. Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  70. Jain SSL. 2006. Injury: The Politics of Product Design and Safety Law in the United States Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  71. Kilbourn K. 2012. The patient as skilled practitioner. See Gunn & Donovan 2012a 35–44
  72. Kingery WD. 2001. The design process as a critical component of the anthropology of technology. Anthropological Perspectives on Technology MB Schiffer 123–38 Albuquerque: Univ. N. M. Press [Google Scholar]
  73. Krause-Jensen J. 2010. Flexible Firm: The Design of Culture at Bang and Olufsen New York: Berghahn Books [Google Scholar]
  74. Kroeber AL. 1919. On the principles of order in civilization as exemplified by changes of fashion. Am. Anthropol. 21:3235–63 [Google Scholar]
  75. Küchler S. 2010. Materials and design. See Clarke 2010 130–41
  76. Kus S, Raharijaona V. 2000. House to palace, village to state: scaling up architecture and ideology. Am. Anthropol. 102:198–113 [Google Scholar]
  77. Larkin B. 2013. The politics and poetics of infrastructure. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 42:1327–43 [Google Scholar]
  78. Larsen H, Have C. 2012. Emergence of user identity in social interaction. See Gunn & Donovan 2012a 135–47
  79. Latour B. 2008. A cautious Prometheus? A few steps toward a philosophy of design (with special attention to Peter Sloterdijk) Keynote lecture presented at Design Hist. Soc. Meet., “Networks of Design,” Sept. 3, Falmouth, UK [Google Scholar]
  80. Lawrence D, Low S. 1990. The built environment and spatial form. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 19:453–505 [Google Scholar]
  81. Lawrence-Zúñiga D. 2014. Bungalows and mansions: white suburbs, immigrant aspirations, and aesthetic governmentality. Anthropol. Q. 87:3819–54 [Google Scholar]
  82. Lee D. 2013. “Anybody can do it”: aesthetic empowerment, urban citizenship, and the naturalization of Indonesian graffiti and street art. City Soc 25:3304–27 [Google Scholar]
  83. Lee S. 2013. Race, risk, and recreation in personal genomics: the limits of play. Med. Anthropol. Q. 27:4550–69 [Google Scholar]
  84. Low SM. 2004. Behind the Gates: Life, Security, and the Pursuit of Happiness in Fortress America New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  85. Low SM, Chambers E. 1989. Housing, Culture, and Design: A Comparative Perspective Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press [Google Scholar]
  86. Luvaas B. 2012. DIY Style: Fashion, Music, and Global Digital Cultures London: Bloomsbury [Google Scholar]
  87. Luvaas B. 2013. Material interventions: Indonesian DIY fashion and the regime of the global brand. Cult. Anthropol. 28:1127–43 [Google Scholar]
  88. Manning P. 2010. The semiotics of brand. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 39:133–49 [Google Scholar]
  89. Manning P, Uplisashvili A. 2007. “Our beer”: ethnographic brands in postsocialist Georgia. Am. Anthropol. 109:4626–41 [Google Scholar]
  90. Manzini E. 2015. Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  91. Marcus GE. 2008. The end(s) of ethnography: social/cultural anthropology's signature form of producing knowledge in transition. Cult. Anthropol. 23:11–14 [Google Scholar]
  92. Marcus GE. 2014. Prototyping and contemporary anthropological experiments with ethnographic method. J. Cult. Econ. 7:4399–410 [Google Scholar]
  93. Masco J. 2006. The Nuclear Borderlands: The Manhattan Project in Post-Cold War New Mexico Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  94. Mazzarella W. 2003. Shoveling Smoke: Advertising and Globalization in Contemporary India Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  95. Milestone J. 2007. Design as power: Paul Virilio and the governmentality of design expertise. Cult. Theory Crit. 48:2175–98 [Google Scholar]
  96. Miller C. 2014. Lost in translation? Ethics and ethnography in design research. J. Bus. Anthropol. 1:162–78 [Google Scholar]
  97. Miller D. 1987. Material Culture and Mass Consumption Oxford, UK: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  98. Miller D. 2001. Home Possessions: Material Culture Behind Closed Doors Oxford, UK: Berg [Google Scholar]
  99. Miller D. 2010. Stuff Cambridge, UK: Polity [Google Scholar]
  100. Modell J. 1989. “It is besides a pleasant English word”: Ruth Benedict's concept of patterns. Anthropol. Q. 62:127–40 [Google Scholar]
  101. Moon CH. 2009. From factories to fashion: an intern's experience of New York as a global fashion capital. The Fabric of Cultures: Fashion, Identity, and Globalization E Paulicelli, H Clark 194–210 New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  102. Moore RE. 2003. From genericide to viral marketing: on “brand”. Lang. Commun. 23:3–4331–57 [Google Scholar]
  103. Morgan LH. 1877. Ancient Society New York: Holt [Google Scholar]
  104. Morgan LH. 1881. Houses and House-Life of the American Aborigines Washington, DC: GPO [Google Scholar]
  105. Murphy KM. 2005. Collaborative imagining: the interactive use of gestures, talk and graphic representation in architectural practice. Semiotica 2005:156113–45 [Google Scholar]
  106. Murphy KM. 2012. Transmodality and temporality in design interactions. J. Pragmat. 44:141966–81 [Google Scholar]
  107. Murphy KM. 2013. A cultural geometry: designing political things in Sweden. Am. Ethnol. 40:1118–31 [Google Scholar]
  108. Murphy KM. 2015. Swedish Design: An Ethnography Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  109. Murphy KM, Marcus GE. 2013. Epilogue: Ethnography and design, ethnography in design…ethnography by design. See Gunn et al. 2013 251–68
  110. Nakassis CV. 2012a. Brand, citationality, performativity. Am. Anthropol. 114:4624–38 [Google Scholar]
  111. Nakassis CV. 2012b. Counterfeiting what?: Aesthetics of brandedness and brand in Tamil Nadu, India. Anthropol. Q. 85:3701–21 [Google Scholar]
  112. Newman A. 2011. Contested ecologies: environmental activism and urban space in immigrant Paris. City Soc 23:2192–209 [Google Scholar]
  113. Nicewonger TE. 2015. Boundary objects revisited: a comparative analysis of world making in avant-garde fashion design and animal husbandry. Mind Cult. Act. 22:2152–67 [Google Scholar]
  114. Olson V, Messeri L. 2015. Beyond the anthropocene: un-earthing an epoch. Environ. Soc. Adv. Res. 6:128–47 [Google Scholar]
  115. Paley W. 1802. Natural Theology: Or, Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity London: J. Faulder [Google Scholar]
  116. Papanek V. 1984. Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change New York: Pantheon, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  117. Pfaffenberger B. 1992. Social anthropology of technology. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 21:491–516 [Google Scholar]
  118. Powell JW. 1899. Esthetology, or the science of activities designed to give pleasure. Am. Anthropol. 1:11–40 [Google Scholar]
  119. Powell JW. 1900. Philiology, or the science of activities designed for expression. Am. Anthropol. 2:4603–37 [Google Scholar]
  120. Powell JW. 1901. Sophiology, or the science of activities designed to give instruction. Am. Anthropol. 3:51–79 [Google Scholar]
  121. Rabinow P. 1989. French Modern: Norms and Forms of the Social Environment Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  122. Rabinow P, Marcus GE. 2008. Designs for an Anthropology of the Contemporary Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  123. Rapoport A. 1969. House Form and Culture Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall [Google Scholar]
  124. Rattray NA. 2013. Contesting urban space and disability in highland Ecuador. City Soc. 25:125–46 [Google Scholar]
  125. Richardson J, Kroeber AL. 1940. Three Centuries of Women's Dress Fashions: A Quantitative Analysis Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  126. Rotenberg R. 2015. Design standards as urban planning: from technical specification to community “look” in northeast Illinois suburbs. Econ. Anthropol. 2:1145–64 [Google Scholar]
  127. Sadre-Orafai S. 2016. Models, measurement, and the problem of mediation in the New York fashion industry. Vis. Anthropol. Rev. 32:2In press [Google Scholar]
  128. Salvador T, Bell G, Anderson K. 1999. Design ethnography. Des. Manag. J. 10:435–41 [Google Scholar]
  129. Sapir E. 1931. Fashion. Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 6139–44 New York: Macmillan [Google Scholar]
  130. Schüll ND. 2012. Addiction by Design: Machine Gambling in Las Vegas Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  131. Schwenkel C. 2013. Post/socialist affect: ruination and reconstruction of the nation in urban Vietnam. Cult. Anthropol. 28:2252–77 [Google Scholar]
  132. Schwittay A. 2014. Designing development: humanitarian design in the financial inclusion assemblage. PoLAR Polit. Leg. Anthropol. Rev. 37:129–47 [Google Scholar]
  133. Shankar S. 2015. Advertising Diversity: Ad Agencies and the Creation of Asian American Consumers Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  134. Shea A. 2012. Designing For Social Change: Strategies for Community-Based Graphic Design Princeton, NJ: Princeton Archit. Press [Google Scholar]
  135. Simmel G. 1957. Fashion. Am. J. Sociol. 62:6541–58 [Google Scholar]
  136. Smith RC. 2013. Designing heritage for a digital culture. See Gunn et al. 2013 117–35
  137. Spencer H. 1880. The Study of Sociology London: Williams and Norgate [Google Scholar]
  138. Squires S, Byrne B. 2002. Creating Breakthrough Ideas: The Collaboration of Anthropologists and Designers in the Product Development Industry Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey [Google Scholar]
  139. Suchman L, Trigg R, Blomberg J. 2002. Working artefacts: ethnomethods of the prototype. Br. J. Sociol. 53:2163–79 [Google Scholar]
  140. Suchman LA. 2007. Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Action Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  141. Suchman LA. 2011. Anthropological relocations and the limits of design. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 40:11–18 [Google Scholar]
  142. Suri JF. 2010. Poetic observation: what designers make of what they see. See Clarke 2010 16–32
  143. Tunstall E. 2013. Decolonizing design innovation: design anthropology, critical anthropology, and indigenous knowledge. See Gunn et al. 2013 232–50
  144. Urban G, Koh K-N. 2013. Ethnographic research on modern business corporations. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 42:1139–58 [Google Scholar]
  145. van der Hoorn M. 2009. Indispensable Eyesores: An Anthropology of Undesired Buildings New York: Berghahn Books [Google Scholar]
  146. Vinck D. 2003. Everyday Engineering: An Ethnography of Design Innovation Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  147. Wasson C. 2000. Ethnography in the field of design. Hum. Organ. 59:4377–88 [Google Scholar]
  148. Were G. 2013. On the materials of mats: thinking through design in a Melanesian society. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 19:3581–99 [Google Scholar]
  149. Winick C. 1961. Anthropology's contribution to marketing. J. Mark. 25:553–60 [Google Scholar]
  150. Yaneva A. 2009. Made by the Office for Metropolitan Architecture: An Ethnography of Design Amsterdam: 010 Publ. [Google Scholar]
  151. Yarrow T, Jones S. 2014. “Stone is stone”: engagement and detachment in the craft of conservation masonry. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 20:256–75 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-100224
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error