1932

Abstract

Sustainable waste management is a goal that all societies must strive to maintain. Currently nearly 80% of global wastes are sent to landfill, with a significant amount lacking proper design or containment. The increased attention to environmental impacts of human activities and the increasing demand for energy and materials have resulted in a new perspective on waste streams. Use of waste streams for energy and materials recovery is becoming more prevalent, especially in developed regions of the world, such as Europe, the United States, and Japan. Although currently these efforts have a small impact on waste disposal, use of waste streams to extract value very likely will increase as society becomes more aware of the options available. This review presents an overview of waste management with a focus on following an expanded waste hierarchy to extract value specifically from municipal solid waste streams.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060713-040306
2014-06-07
2024-05-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/chembioeng/5/1/annurev-chembioeng-060713-040306.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060713-040306&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Smith JM, Van Ness HC, Abbott MM. 1.  2005. Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics Boston: McGraw-Hill, 7th ed..
  2. Brunner PH, Rechberger H. 2.  2004. Practical Handbook of Material Flow Analysis Boca Raton, FL: CRC/Lewis318
  3. Matsunaga K, Themelis NJ. 3.  2002. Effects of affluence and population density on waste generation and disposal of municipal solid wastes. Earth Eng. Cent. Rep., Columbia Univ., NY
  4. van Haaren R, Themelis NJ, Barlaz M. 4.  2010. LCA comparison of windrow compositing of yard wastes with use as alternative daily cover (ADC). Waste Manag. 30:2649–56 [Google Scholar]
  5. 5. Agency USEP 1991. The RCRA (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) Amendments bill. Healthc. Hazard Mater. Manag. 5:111 [Google Scholar]
  6. Heller K, Nourani V. 6.  2008. Economic impacts of revised MACT standards for hospital/medical/infectious waste incinerators Rep. RTI Int., Res. Triangle Park, NC
  7. Sandler K. 7.  2003. Analyzing what's recyclable in C&D debris. BioCycle 44:51–59 [Google Scholar]
  8. Themelis NJ. 8.  2008. Reducing landfill methane emissions and expansion of the hierarchy of waste management. Proc. Glob. Waste Manag. Symp., Copper Mountain, CO, Sept. 8–10. Stamford, CT: Glob. Waste Manag. Symp. [Google Scholar]
  9. Martínez-Blanco J, Antón A, Rieradevall J, Castellari M, Muñoz P. 9.  2011. Comparing nutritional value and yield as functional units in the environmental assessment of horticultural production with organic or mineral fertilization. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 16:12–26 [Google Scholar]
  10. 10. Confed. Eur. Waste-to-Energy Plants 2012. Waste-to-Energy State-of-the-Art Report Wein, Austria: Int. Solid Waste Assoc.
  11. Klinghoffer NB, Castaldi MJ. 11.  2013. Waste to Energy Conversion Technology Cambridge: Woodhead Publ. Ser.
  12. Niessen WR, Marks CH, Sommerlad RE. 12.  1996. Evaluation of Gasification and Novel Thermal Processes for the Treatment of Municipal Solid Waste Golden, CO: Natl. Renew. Energy Lab.
  13. Lamers F, Fleck E, Pelloni L, Kamuk B. 13.  2013. Alternative Waste Conversion Technologies Wein, Austria: Int. Solid Waste Assoc.
  14. 14. Bur. Natl. Aff 1991. The Clean Air Act Amendments. Washington, DC: Bur. Natl. Aff.
  15. Horinko ML. 15.  2003. Letter from EPA Administration to Integrated Waste Services Association Washington, DC: US Environ. Prot. Agency
  16. Wiles CC, Shepherd PB. 16.  1999. Beneficial Use and Recycling of Municipal Waste Combustion Residues: A Comprehensive Resource Document Golden, CO: Natl. Renew. Energy Lab.
  17. Arcaini GB. 17.  2000. Ash recycling in Nashville, TN Presented at 8th Annu. N. Am. Waste-to-Energy Conf., Nashville, TN
  18. Lucido SP. 18.  2000. The use of municipal waste combustor ash as a partial replacement of aggregate in bituminous paving material Pub. No. GR-WTE-0108. Presented at 8th Annu. N. Am. Waste-to-Energy Conf., Nashville, TN
  19. Roethel F, Breslin V. 19.  1995. Municipal Solid Waste Combustor Ash Demonstration Program: “The Boathouse. Washington, DC: US Environ. Prot. Agency [Google Scholar]
  20. Kuhn JN. 20.  2012. Syngas production with desired hydrogen-to-carbon monoxide ratios by catalytic tri-reforming of landfill-derived gases. Rep. 1032027, Univ. Fla., Gainsville
  21. Kohn MP, Castaldi MJ, Farrauto RJ. 21.  2010. Auto-thermal and dry reforming of landfill gas over a Rh/γAl2O3 monolith catalyst. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 94:125–33 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kohn MP, Lee J, Basinger ML, Castaldi MJ. 22.  2011. Performance of an internal combustion engine operating on landfill gas and the effect of syngas addition. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50:3570–79 [Google Scholar]
  23. Afon A. 23.  2012. A survey of operational characteristics, socioeconomic and health effects of scavenging activity in Lagos, Nigeria. Waste Manag. Res. 30:664–71 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060713-040306
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060713-040306
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error