1932

Abstract

The brewing of beer is an ancient biotechnology, the unit processes of which have not changed in hundreds of years. Equally, scientific study within the brewing industry not only has ensured that modern beer making is highly controlled, leading to highly consistent, high-quality, healthful beverages, but also has informed many other fermentation-based industries.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060816-101450
2017-06-07
2024-06-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/chembioeng/8/1/annurev-chembioeng-060816-101450.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060816-101450&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Hornsey IS. 1.  2003. A History of Beer and Brewing Cambridge, UK: R. Soc. Chem. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bamforth C. 2.  2009. Beer: Tap into the Art and Science of Brewing New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 3rd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bamforth C. 3.  2008. Grape Versus Grain New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  4. Bamforth CW. 4.  2000. Brewing and brewing research: past, present and future. J. Sci. Food Agric. 80:1371–78 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bamforth CW, Stewart GG. 5.  2010. Brewing—the transformation of a craft into a technology. Biologist 57:139–47 [Google Scholar]
  6. Russell ST, Singh RP, Bamforth CW. 6.  2008. Alternative paradigms for the production of beer. J. Inst. Brew. 114:349–56 [Google Scholar]
  7. Heymann H, Goldberg JR, Wallin CE, Bamforth CW. 7.  2010. A “beer” made from a bland alcohol base. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 68:75–76 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bamforth CW. 8.  2005. Intensifying malting and brewing—Does the customer care?. Brew. Guard. 134:830–32 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bamforth CW. 9.  2006. Don't like it—but hard to deny it. Brew. Guard. 135:120–22 [Google Scholar]
  10. Nakatani K. 10.  2007. Beer in Japan—present and future trends. The story of Happoshu and the “Third Way.”. Brew. Distill. 3:554–57 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bamforth CW. 11.  2004. Opportunities for newer technologies in the oldest biotechnology, brewing. Appl. Biotechnol. Food Sci. Policy 1:213–22 [Google Scholar]
  12. Goode DL, Wijngaard HH, Arendt EK. 12.  2005. Mashing with unmalted barley—impact of malted barley and commercial enzyme (Bacillus spp.) additions. Master Brewer Assoc. Am. Tech. Q. 42:184–98 [Google Scholar]
  13. Sarlin T, Kivioja T, Kalkkinen N, Linder MB, Nakari-Setälä T. 13.  2012. Identification and characterization of gushing-active hydrophobins from Fusarium graminearum and related species. J. Basic Microbiol. 52:184–94 [Google Scholar]
  14. Von Wettstein D, Nilan RA, Ahrenst-Larsen B, Erdal K, Ingversen J. 14.  et al. 1985. Proanthocyanidin-free barley for brewing: progress in breeding for high yield and research tool in polyphenol chemistry. Master Brewer Assoc. Am. Tech. Q. 22:41–52 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hirota N, Kaneko T, Kuroda H, Kaneda H, Takashio M. 15.  et al. 2005. Characterization of lipoxygenase-1 null mutants in barley. Theor. Appl. Genet. 111:1580–84 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hammond JRM. 16.  2016. Biographical review: microscopes, microbes, and manipulation: 35 years in brewing. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 74:157–72 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bamforth CW, Kanauchi M. 17.  2001. A simple model for the cell wall of the starchy endosperm in barley. J. Inst. Brew. 107:235–40 [Google Scholar]
  18. Scheffler A, Bamforth CW. 18.  2005. Exogenous β-glucanases and pentosanases and their impact on mashing. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 36:813–17 [Google Scholar]
  19. Wrobel R, Jones BL. 19.  1992. Appearance of endoproteolytic enzymes during the germination of barley. Plant Physiol 100:1508–16 [Google Scholar]
  20. Bamforth CW. 20.  2009. Producing gluten-free beer—an overview. The Science of Gluten-Free Foods and Beverages EK Arendt, F Dal Bello 113–17 St. Paul: AACC Int. [Google Scholar]
  21. Bamforth CW, Milani C. 21.  2004. The foaming of mixtures of albumin and hordein protein hydrolysates in model systems. J. Sci. Food Agric. 84:1001–4 [Google Scholar]
  22. Bamforth CW. 22.  2003. Barley and malt starch in brewing: a general review. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. Tech. Q. 40:89–97 [Google Scholar]
  23. Stenholm K, Home S. 23.  1999. A new approach to limit dextrinase and its role in mashing. J. Inst. Brew. 105:205–10 [Google Scholar]
  24. Heisner CB, Bamforth CW. 24.  2008. Thioredoxin in barley: Could it have a role in releasing limit dextrinase in brewery mashes?. J. Inst. Brew. 114:122–26 [Google Scholar]
  25. Anness BJ, Reed RJR. 25.  1985. Lipids in the brewery—a material balance. J. Inst. Brew. 91:82–87 [Google Scholar]
  26. Casey TR, Bamforth CW. 26.  2010. Silicon in beer and brewing. J. Sci. Food. Agric. 90:784–88 [Google Scholar]
  27. Fillaudeau L, Blanpain-Avet P, Daufin G. 27.  2006. Water, wastewater and waste management in brewing industries. J. Clean. Prod. 14:463–71 [Google Scholar]
  28. Palmer J, Kaminski C. 28.  2013. Water: A Comprehensive Guide for Brewers Boulder, CO: Brewers [Google Scholar]
  29. Eumann M. 29.  2006. Water in brewing. See Reference 115 183–207
  30. Freeman G. 30.  2006. Filtration and stabilisation of beer. See Reference 115 275–92
  31. Reed R. 31.  2006. Waste handling in the brewing process. See Reference 115 335–57
  32. Henning J. 32.  2006. The breeding of hop. See Reference 115 102–22
  33. Darby P. 33.  2004. Hop growing in England in the twenty first century. J. R. Agric. Soc. Eng. 165. http://adha.us/sites/default/files/downloads/UK%20Report%20on%20the%20Future%20of%20Low%20Trellis.pdf [Google Scholar]
  34. Turner SF, Benedict CA, Darby H, Hoagland LA, Simonson P. 34.  et al. 2011. Challenges and opportunities for organic hop production in the United States. Agron. J. 103:1645–54 [Google Scholar]
  35. Roberts TR. 35.  2016. Hops. In Brewing Materials and Processes: A Practical Approach to Beer Excellence CW Bamforth 47–75 San Diego, CA: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
  36. Boulton C, Quain D. 36.  2006. Brewing Yeast and Fermentation Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  37. Gallone B, Mertens S, Crauwelse S, Lievense B, Verstrepen1 KJ, Steensels J. 37.  2017. Genomics and evolution of beer yeasts. Brewing Microbiology: Current Research, Omics and Microbial Ecology NA Bokulich, CW Bamforth Poole, UK: Caister Acad. In press [Google Scholar]
  38. Coghe S, Benoot K, Delvaux F, Vanderhaegen B, Delvaux FR. 38.  2004. Ferulic acid release and 4-vinylguaiacol formation during brewing and fermentation: indications for feruloyl esterase activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. . J. Agric. Food Chem. 52:602–8 [Google Scholar]
  39. Bokulich N, Bamforth CW, Mills DA. 39.  2012. Brewhouse resident microbiota are responsible for multi-stage fermentation of American Coolship Ale. PLOS ONE 7:4e35507 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035507 [Google Scholar]
  40. Bokulich NA, Bamforth CW. 40.  2013. The microbiology of malting and brewing. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 77:157–72 [Google Scholar]
  41. Chen YF, Yang X, Zhang SJ, Wang XQ, Guo CH. 41.  et al. 2012. Development of Saccharomyces cerevisiae producing higher levels of sulfur dioxide and glutathione to improve beer flavor stability. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 166:402–13 [Google Scholar]
  42. Hansen J, Bruun SV, Bech LM, Gjermansen C. 42.  2002. The level of MXR1 gene expression in brewing yeast during beer fermentation is a major determinant for the concentration of dimethyl sulfide in beer. FEMS Yeast Res 2:137–49 [Google Scholar]
  43. Briggs DE. 43.  1987. Accelerating malting: a review of some lessons of the past from the United Kingdom. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 45:1–8 [Google Scholar]
  44. Davies N. 44.  2016. Malts. In Brewing Materials and Processes: A Practical Approach to Beer Excellence CW Bamforth 1–25 San Diego, CA: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
  45. Wainwright T. 45.  1986. Nitrosamines in malt and beer. J. Inst. Brew. 92:73–80 [Google Scholar]
  46. Rouse S, van Sinderen D. 46.  2008. Bioprotective potential of lactic acid bacteria in malting and brewing. J. Food Prot. 71:1724–33 [Google Scholar]
  47. Murray JP, Bennett SJE, Chandra GS, Davies NI, Pickles JL. 47.  1999. Sensory analysis of malt. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. Tech. Q. 36:15–19 [Google Scholar]
  48. Andrews JMH. 48.  2006. The brewhouse. See Reference 115 208–27
  49. Pöyri S, Mikola M, Sontag-Strohm T, Kaukovirta-Norja A, Home S. 49.  2002. The formation and hydrolysis of barley malt gel-protein under different mashing conditions. J. Inst. Brew. 108:261–67 [Google Scholar]
  50. Bamforth CW, Roza JR, Kanauchi M. 50.  2009. Storage of malt, thiol oxidase and brewhouse performance. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 67:89–94 [Google Scholar]
  51. Vanderhaegen B, Neven H, Verachtert H, Derdelinckx G. 51.  2006. The chemistry of beer aging—a critical review. Food Chem 95:357–81 [Google Scholar]
  52. Lewis MJ, Robertson IC, Dankers SU. 52.  1992. Proteolysis in the protein rest of mashing—An appraisal. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. Tech. Q. 29:117–21 [Google Scholar]
  53. Bamforth CW. 53.  2009. Current perspectives on the role of enzymes in brewing. J. Cereal Sci. 50:353–57 [Google Scholar]
  54. Andrews JA. 54.  2004. Review of progress in mash separation technology. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. Tech. Q. 41:45–49 [Google Scholar]
  55. Aliyu S, Bala M. 55.  2011. Brewer's spent grain: a review of its potentials and applications. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 10:324–31 [Google Scholar]
  56. Bamforth C. 56.  2009. Wizards, volcanoes and beautiful music: developments in wort boiling. Brew. Guard. 138:523–24 [Google Scholar]
  57. Siebert KJ, Blum PH, Wisk TJ, Stenroos LE, Anklam WJ. 57.  1986. The effect of trub on fermentation. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. Tech. Q. 23:37–43 [Google Scholar]
  58. Bamforth CW, Boulton CA, Clarkson SP, Large PJ. 58.  1988. The effects of oxygen on brewery process performance. Proc. 20th Conv. Inst. Brew. (Aust. NZ Sect.) Brisbane:211–19 [Google Scholar]
  59. Stewart GG. 59.  2010. High gravity brewing and distilling—past experiences and future prospects. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 68:1–9 [Google Scholar]
  60. Gosselin Y, Fels S. 60.  1998. Fermentation characteristics from dried ale and lager yeasts. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. Tech. Q. 35:129–32 [Google Scholar]
  61. Cooper DJ, Stewart GG, Bryce JH. 61.  1998. Some reasons why high gravity brewing has a negative effect on head retention. J. Inst. Brew. 104:83–87 [Google Scholar]
  62. Chan LL, Driscoll D, Kuksin D, Saldi S. 62.  2016. Measuring lager and ale yeast viability and vitality using fluorescence-based image cytometry. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. Tech. Q. 53:49–54 [Google Scholar]
  63. Heggart HM, Margaritis A, Pilkington H, Stewart RJ, Dowhanick TM, Russell I. 63.  1999. Factors affecting yeast viability and vitality characteristics: a review. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. Tech. Q. 36:383–406 [Google Scholar]
  64. Carvell JP, Turner K. 64.  2003. New applications and methods utilizing radio-frequency impedance measurements for improving yeast management. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. Tech. Q. 40:30–38 [Google Scholar]
  65. Boulton CA. 65.  2012. 125th anniversary review: advances in analytical methodology in brewing. J. Inst. Brew. 118:255–63 [Google Scholar]
  66. Verstrepen KJ, Derdelinckx G, Verachtert H, Delvaux FR. 66.  2003. Yeast flocculation: what brewers should know. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 61:197–205 [Google Scholar]
  67. Vidgren V, Londesborough J. 67.  2011. 125th anniversary review: yeast flocculation and sedimentation in brewing. J. Inst. Brew. 117:475–87 [Google Scholar]
  68. Daoud IS, Searle BA. 68.  1990. On-line monitoring of brewery fermentation by measurement of CO2 evolution rate. J. Inst. Brew. 96:297–302 [Google Scholar]
  69. Krogerus K, Gibson BR. 69.  2013. 125th anniversary review: diacetyl and its control during brewery fermentation. J. Inst. Brew. 119:86–97 [Google Scholar]
  70. Inoue T. 70.  2008. Diacetyl in Fermented Foods and Beverages St. Paul: Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. [Google Scholar]
  71. Rostgaard-Jensen B, Svendsen I, Ottesen M. 71.  1987. Isolation and characterization of an α-acetolactate decarboxylase useful for accelerated beer maturation. Proc. Eur. Brew. Conv. Cong. Madrid393–400 [Google Scholar]
  72. Bamforth C. 72.  2002. Great brewing debates: part 4. Does beer get better with ageing?. Brew. Guard. 131:1026–28 [Google Scholar]
  73. Tanguler H, Erten H. 73.  2008. Utilisation of spent brewer's yeast for yeast extract production by autolysis: the effect of temperature. Food Bioprod. Process. 86:317–21 [Google Scholar]
  74. Brányik T, Vicente AA, Dostálek P, Teixeira JA. 74.  2008. A review of flavour formation in continuous beer fermentations. J. Inst. Brew. 114:3–13 [Google Scholar]
  75. Leather RV. 75.  1998. From field to firkin: an integrated approach to beer clarification and quality. J. Inst. Brew. 104:9–18 [Google Scholar]
  76. Miedl M, Bamforth CW. 76.  2004. The relative importance of temperature and time in the cold conditioning of beer. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 62:75–78 [Google Scholar]
  77. Rehmanji M, Gopal C, Mola A. 77.  2005. Beer stabilization technology—clearly a matter of choice. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. Tech. Q. 42:332–38 [Google Scholar]
  78. Akeroyd M, van Zandycke S, den Hartog J, Mutsaers J, Edens L. 78.  et al. 2016. AN-PEP, proline-specific endopeptidase, degrades all known immunostimulatory gluten peptides in beer made from barley malt. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 74:91–99 [Google Scholar]
  79. Guerdrum LJ, Bamforth CW. 79.  2012. Prolamin levels through brewing and the impact of prolyl endopeptidase. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 70:35–38 [Google Scholar]
  80. Klimovitz R, Ockert K. 80.  2014. Beer Packaging St Paul: Master Brew. Assoc. Am, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  81. Lynch DM, Bamforth CW. 81.  2002. Measurement and characterization of bubble nucleation in beer. J. Food Sci. 67:2696–701 [Google Scholar]
  82. Lee WT, McKechnie JS, Devereux MG. 82.  2011. Bubble nucleation in stout beer. Phys. Rev. E 83:1609 [Google Scholar]
  83. Evans DE, Bamforth CW. 83.  2009. Beer foam: achieving a suitable head. Beer: A Quality Perspective CW Bamforth 1–60 Burlington, MA: Academic [Google Scholar]
  84. Lusk LT. 84.  2016. Controlling beer foam and gushing. Brewing Materials and Processes: A Practical Approach to Beer Excellence CW Bamforth 175–98 San Diego, CA: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
  85. Slack PT, Bamforth CW. 85.  1983. The fractionation of polypeptides from barley and beer by hydrophobic interaction chromatography: the influence of their hydrophobicity on foam stability. J. Inst. Brew. 89:397–401 [Google Scholar]
  86. Bech LM, Vaag P, Heinemann B, Breddam K. 86.  1995. Throughout the brewing process barley lipid transfer protein 1 (LTP1) is transformed into a more foam promoting form. Proc. Eur. Brew. Conv. Congr., Brussels561–68 Oxford: IRL [Google Scholar]
  87. Simpson WJ, Hughes PS. 87.  1994. Stabilization of foams by hop-derived bitter acids. Chemical interactions in beer foam. Cerevisiae Biotechnol 19:39–44 [Google Scholar]
  88. Roza JR, Wallin CE, Bamforth CW. 88.  2006. A comparison between the instrumental measurement of head retention/lacing and perceived foam quality. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. Tech. Q. 43:173–76 [Google Scholar]
  89. Bishop LR. 89.  1977. The nitrogenous complexes of haze and foam and their measurement. J. Inst. Brew. 83:350–55 [Google Scholar]
  90. Lusk LT, Goldstein H, Ryder D. 90.  1995. Independent role of beer proteins, melanoidins and polysaccharides in foam formation. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 53:93–103 [Google Scholar]
  91. Jackson G, Roberts RT, Wainwright T. 91.  1980. Mechanism of beer foam stabilization by propylene glycol alginate. J. Inst. Brew. 86:34–37 [Google Scholar]
  92. Carroll TCN. 92.  1979. The effect of dissolved nitrogen gas on beer foam and palate. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. Tech. Q. 16:116–19 [Google Scholar]
  93. Ronteltap AD, Hollemans M, Bisperink CGJ, Prins A. 93.  1991. Beer foam physics. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. Tech. Q. 28:25–32 [Google Scholar]
  94. Dickie KH, Cann C, Norman EC, Bamforth CW, Muller RE. 94.  2001. Foam-negative materials. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 59:17–23 [Google Scholar]
  95. Combe AL, Ang JK, Bamforth CW. 95.  2013. Positive and negative impacts of specialty malts on beer foam: a comparison of various cereal products for their foaming properties. J. Sci. Food Agric. 93:2094–101 [Google Scholar]
  96. Ang JK, Bamforth CW. 96.  2014. Foam inhibitors from specialty malts. J. Inst. Brew. 120:193–200 [Google Scholar]
  97. Kobayashi N, Kaneda H, Kano Y, Koslimo S. 97.  1994. Behavior of lipid hydroperoxides during mashing. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 52:141–45 [Google Scholar]
  98. Wessels JGH. 98.  1996. Fungal hydrophobins: proteins that function at an interface. Trends Plant Sci 1:9–15 [Google Scholar]
  99. Shellhammer T, Bamforth CW. 99.  2008. Assessing color quality of beer. Color Quality of Fresh and Processed Foods CA Culver, RE Wrolstad 192–202 Washington, DC: Am. Chem. Soc. [Google Scholar]
  100. De Lange AJ. 100.  2016. Color. In Brewing Materials and Processes: A Practical Approach to Beer Excellence CW Bamforth 199–249 San Diego, CA: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
  101. Bamforth CW. 101.  1999. Beer haze. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 57:81–90 [Google Scholar]
  102. Bamforth CW. 102.  2014. Practical Guides for Beer Quality: Flavor St. Paul: Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. [Google Scholar]
  103. Bamforth CW, Parsons R. 103.  1985. New procedures to improve the flavor stability of beer. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 43:197–202 [Google Scholar]
  104. Uchida M, Suga S, Ono M. 104.  1996. Improvement for oxidative flavor stability of beer—rapid prediction method for beer flavor stability by electron spin resonance spectroscopy. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 54:205–11 [Google Scholar]
  105. Tricker AR, Preussmann R. 105.  1991. Volatile and non-volatile nitrosamines in beer. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 117:130–32 [Google Scholar]
  106. Gaziano JM, Hennekens CH, Godfried SL, Sesso HD, Glynn RJ. 106.  et al. 1999. Type of alcoholic beverage and risk of myocardial infarction. Am. J. Cardiol. 83:52–57 [Google Scholar]
  107. Rico H, Gallego-Lago JL, Hernández ER, Villa LF, Sanchez-Atrio A. 107.  et al. 2000. Effect of silicon supplement on osteopenia induced by ovariectomy in rats. Calcif. Tissue Int. 66:53–55 [Google Scholar]
  108. Bamforth CW, Gambill SC. 108.  2007. Fiber and putative prebiotics in beer. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 65:67–69 [Google Scholar]
  109. Kanyer AJ. 109.  2016. The digestive fate of beta-glucan oligosaccharides in beer MS Thesis, Univ Calif., Davis: [Google Scholar]
  110. Bourne L, Paganga G, Baxter D, Hughes P, Rice-Evans C. 110.  2000. Absorption of ferulic acid from low-alcohol beer. Free Radic. Res. 32:273–80 [Google Scholar]
  111. Owens JE, Clifford AJ, Bamforth CW. 111.  2007. Folate in beer. J. Inst. Brew. 113:243–48 [Google Scholar]
  112. Wannamethee SG, Shaper AG, Whincup PH. 112.  2005. Alcohol and adiposity: effects of quantity and type of drink and time relation with meals. Int. J. Obes. 29:1436–44 [Google Scholar]
  113. Galobardes B, Morabia A, Bernstein MS. 113.  2001. Diet and socioeconomic position: Does the use of different indicators matter?. Int. J. Epidemiol. 30:334–40 [Google Scholar]
  114. Bamforth C. 114.  2015. “Beer is good for you” as a message in academia. Ethanol and Education: Alcohol as a Theme for Teaching Chemistry R Barth 113–18 Washington, DC: Am. Chem. Soc. [Google Scholar]
  115. Bamforth CW. 115.  2006. Brewing: New Technologies Cambridge, UK: Woodhead [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060816-101450
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060816-101450
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error