Extreme Risk Protection Orders in the United States: A Systematic Review of the Research

Literature Cited

1. Anestis MD, Daruwala SE. 2021.. The association between beliefs about the centrality of mental illness in gun violence and general firearm beliefs and behaviors. . Psychol. Violence 11:(4):364–75
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
2. Barnard LM, McCarthy M, Knoepke CE, Kaplan S, Engeln J, Betz ME. 2021.. Colorado's first year of extreme risk protection orders. . Inj. Epidemiol. 8::59
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
3. Betz ME, Frattaroli S, Knoepke CE, Johnson R, Christy A, et al. 2023.. Extreme risk protection orders in older adults in six U.S. states: a descriptive study. . Clin. Gerontol. 47:(4):536–43
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
4. Blocher J, Charles JD. 2020.. Firearms, extreme risk, and legal design: “red flag” laws and due process. . Va. Law Rev. 106:(6):1285–344
   [Google Scholar]
5. Carter PM, Losman E, Roche JS, Malani PN, Kullgren JT, et al. 2022.. Firearm ownership, attitudes, and safe storage practices among a nationally representative sample of older U.S. adults age 50 to 80. . Prev. Med. 156::106955
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
6. Cent. Dis. Control Prev. 2024.. WISQARS: Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System. . WISQARS. https://wisqars.cdc.gov/
   [Google Scholar]
7. Consort. Risk-Based Firearm Policy. 2013.. Guns, public health and mental illness: an evidence-based approach for state policy. Rep. , Educ. Fund Stop Gun Violence, Washington, DC:. https://riskbasedfirearmpolicy.org/reports-resources/
   [Google Scholar]
8. Consort. Risk-Based Firearm Policy. 2020.. Extreme risk protection orders: new recommendations for policy and implementation. Rep. , Educ. Fund Stop Gun Violence, Washington, DC:. https://efsgv.org/wp-content/uploads/EFSGV-ConsortiumReport2020-ERPOs.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
9. Crifasi CK, Stone EM, McGinty EE, Barry CL. 2021.. Differences in public support for gun policies between women and men. . Am. J. Prev. Med. 60:(1):e9–14
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
10. Crifasi CK, Ward J, McCourt AD, Webster D, Doucette ML. 2023.. The association between permit-to-purchase laws and shootings by police. . Inj. Epidemiol. 10::28
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
11. Delaney G, Charles J, Delaney GA, Charles JD. 2020.. A double-filter provision for expanded red flag laws: a proposal for balancing rights and risks in preventing gun violence. . J. Law Med. Ethics 48:(4):126–32
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
12. Dep. Def. 2023.. Annual report on suicide in the military, calendar year 2022. Rep. , Dep. Def., Washington, DC:. https://www.dspo.mil/Portals/113/Documents/ARSM_CY22.pdf?ver=StAk_q6lJgNRUsOlptzVVA%3d%3d
    [Google Scholar]
13. Frattaroli S, Hoops K, Irvin NA, McCourt A, Nestadt PS, et al. 2019.. Assessment of physician self-reported knowledge and use of Maryland's extreme risk protection order law. . JAMA Netw. Open 2:(12):E1918037
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
14. Frattaroli S, McGinty EE, Barnhorst A, Greenberg S. 2015.. Gun violence restraining orders: alternative or adjunct to mental health-based restrictions on firearms?. Behav. Sci. Law 33:(2–3):290–307
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
15. Frattaroli S, Omaki E, Molocznik A, Allchin A, Hopkins R, et al. 2020.. Extreme risk protection orders in King County, Washington: the epidemiology of dangerous behaviors and an intervention response. . Inj. Epidemiol. 7::44
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
16. Gay C. 2020.. “ Red flag” laws: how law enforcement's controversial new tool to reduce mass shootings fits within current Second Amendment jurisprudence. . Boston Coll. Law Rev. 61:(4):1491–534
    [Google Scholar]
17. Grene K, Dharani A, Siegel M. 2023.. Gun owners’ assessment of gun safety policy: their underlying principles and detailed opinions. . Inj. Epidemiol. 10::21
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
18. Hollo A, VanderStoep A, Frattaroli S. 2022.. Physicians’ perspectives on extreme risk protection orders (ERPOs) in the clinical setting: challenges and opportunities for gun violence prevention. . PLOS ONE 17:(9):e0274489
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
19. Ind. State Police. 2024.. Indiana Jake Laird Law (red flag law). . IN.gov. https://www.in.gov/isp/indiana-jake-laird-law-red-flag-law/
    [Google Scholar]
20. Johnson CM. 2021.. Raising the red flag: examining the constitutionality of extreme risk laws. . Univ. Ill. Law Rev. 2021:(4):1515–46
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kappelman J. 2020.. Just a minor infringement: how Florida's extreme risk protection order applies to at-risk youth and other household members. . Law Psychol. Rev. 45::19–38
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kingdon JW. 1984.. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. Glenview, IL:: Longman-Pearson. , 2nd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kivisto AJ, Phalen PL. 2018.. Effects of risk-based firearm seizure laws in Connecticut and Indiana on suicide rates, 1981–2015. . Psychiatr. Serv. 69:(8):855–62
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
24. Kopel DB. 2020.. Red flag laws: proceed with caution. . Law Psychol. Rev. 45::39–86
    [Google Scholar]
25. NYSRPA v. Bruen, 1422 S. Ct. 2111 ( 2022.)
26. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. 2016.. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. . Syst. Rev. 5::210
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
27. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, et al. 2021.. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. . BMJ 372::n71
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
28. Pallin R, Schleimer JP, Pear VA, Wintemute GJ. 2021a.. Assessment of extreme risk protection order use in California from 2016 to 2019. . JAMA Netw. Open 3:(6):e207735
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
29. Pallin R, Tomsich E, Schleimer JP, Pear VA, Charbonneau A, et al. 2021b.. Understanding the circumstances and stakeholder perceptions of gun violence restraining order use in California: a qualitative study. . Criminol. Public Pol. 20:(4):755–73
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
30. Parker GF. 2015.. Circumstances and outcomes of a firearm seizure law: Marion County, Indiana, 2006–2013. . Behav. Sci. Law 33:(2–3):308–22
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
31. Pear VA, De Biasi A, Charbonneau A. 2023.. Law enforcement officer knowledge of, attitudes toward, and willingness to use extreme risk protection orders. . JAMA Netw. Open 6:(10):e2338455
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
32. Pear VA, Pallin R, Schleimer JP, Tomsich E, Kravitz-Wirtz N, et al. 2022a.. Gun violence restraining orders in California, 2016–2018: case details and respondent mortality. . Inj. Prev. 28:(5):465–71
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
33. Pear VA, Schleimer JP, Aubel AJ, Buggs S, Knoepke CE, et al. 2022b.. Extreme risk protection orders, race/ethnicity, and equity: evidence from California. . Prev. Med. 165:(Part A):107181
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
34. Pear VA, Schleimer JP, Tomsich E, Pallin R, Charbonneau A, et al. 2021.. Implementation and perceived effectiveness of gun violence restraining orders in California: a qualitative evaluation. . PLOS ONE 16:(10):e0258547
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
35. Pear VA, Wintemute GH, Jewell NP, Ahern J. 2022c.. Firearm violence following the implementation of California's gun violence restraining order law. . JAMA Netw. Open 5:(4):E224216
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
36. Pomeranz JL, Ochoa G. 2021.. Firearm extreme risk protection order laws and preemption: new developments and outstanding issues, 50 states, 2020. . Am. J. Prev. Med. 61:(3):455–60
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
37. Prater L, Rooney L, Bowen AG, Conrick K, Mustafa A, et al. 2022.. Civilian petitioners and extreme risk protection orders in the state of Washington. . Psychiatr. Serv. 73:(11):1263–69
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
38. Prater LC, Haviland MJ, Rivara FP, Bellenger MA, Gibb L, Rowhani-Rahbar A. 2021.. Extreme risk protection orders and persons with dementia in the state of Washington. . J. Gen. Intern. Med. 36:(12):3885–87
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
39. Rooney L, Conrick KM, Bellenger MA, Moore M, Haviland MJ, et al. 2021.. Understanding the process, context, and characteristics of extreme risk protection orders: a statewide study. . J. Health Care Poor Underserved 32:(4):2125–42
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
40. Rowhani-Rahbar A, Bellenger MA, Gibb L, Chesnut H, Lowry-Schiller M, et al. 2020.. Extreme risk protection orders in Washington: a statewide descriptive study. . Ann. Intern. Med. 173:(5):342–49
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
41. Saadi A, Choi KR, Takada S, Zimmerman FJ. 2020.. The impact of gun violence restraining order laws in the U.S. and firearm suicide among older adults: a longitudinal state-level analysis, 2012–2016. . BMC Public Health 20::334
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
42. Siegel M, Dunn D, Shareef F, Neufeld M, Boine C. 2021.. The descriptive epidemiology of brand-specific gun ownership in the US: results from the 2019 National Lawful Use of Guns Survey. . Inj. Epidemiol. 8::12
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
43. Shultz NB, Lye CT, D'Onofrio G, Gluck AR, Miller J, et al. 2020.. Understanding the role of law in reducing firearm injury through clinical interventions. . J. Law Med. Ethics 48:(Suppl. 4):146–54
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
44. Stone EM, Crifasi CK, Ward JA, Vernick JS, Webster DW, et al. 2022.. National support for gun policies among U.S. adults in 2019 and 2021. . Prev. Med. 165::107314
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
45. Swanson JW, Easter MM, Alanis-Hirsch K, Belden CM, Norko MA, et al. 2019.. Criminal justice and suicide outcomes with Indiana's risk-based gun seizure law. . J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 47:(2):188–97
    [Google Scholar]
46. Swanson JW, McGinty EE, Fazel S, Mays VM. 2015.. Mental illness and reduction of gun violence and suicide: bringing epidemiologic research to policy. . Ann. Epidemiol. 25:(5):366–76
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
47. Swanson JW, Norko MA, Lin HJ, Alanis-Hirsch K, Frisman LK, et al. 2017.. Implementation and effectiveness of Connecticut's risk-based gun removal law: Does it prevent suicides?. Law Contemp. Probl. 80:(2):179–208
    [Google Scholar]
48. Swanson JW, Sivaraman JC, Easter MM. 2022.. Evaluating extreme risk protection order laws: When is it premature to expect population-level effects?. JAMA Netw. Open 5:(4):e224909
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
49. Tomsich EA, Pear VA, Schleimer JP, Wintemute GJ. 2023.. The origins of California's gun violence restraining order law: a case study using Kingdon's multiple streams framework. . BMC Public Health 23::1275
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
50. Willinger A, Frattaroli S. 2023.. Extreme risk protection orders in the post-Bruen age: weighing evidence, scholarship, and rights for a promising gun violence prevention tool. . Fordham Urban Law J. 51:(1):157–220
    [Google Scholar]
51. Wintemute GJ, Pear VA, Schleimer JP, Pallin R, Sohl S, et al. 2019.. Extreme risk protection orders intended to prevent mass shootings: a case series. . Ann. Intern. Med. 171:(9):655–58
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
52. Zeoli AM, Frattaroli S, Barnard L, Bowen A, Christy A, et al. 2022.. Extreme risk protection orders in response to threats of multiple victim/mass shooting in six U.S. states: a descriptive study. . Prev. Med. 165::107304
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
53. Zeoli AM, Paruk J, Branas CC, Carter PM, Cunningham R, et al. 2021.. Use of extreme risk protection orders to reduce gun violence in Oregon. . Criminol. Public Policy 20:(2):243–61
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
54. Zeoli AM, Paruk JK, Pizzaro JM, Goldstick J. 2019.. Ecological research designs for studies of violence: a methodological guide. . J. Interpers. Violence 34:(23–24):4860–80
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]