1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology
  4. Volume 6, 2024
  5. Article

Annual Review of Developmental Psychology

Volume 6, 2024

Creating Inclusive Environments: Enabling Children to Reject Prejudice and Discrimination

Abstract

Developmental psychology researchers who investigate the multifaceted nature of prejudice, shown within everyday peer interactions, emphasize the importance of creating inclusive environments for children where equity and justice are promoted. This article uses the Social Reasoning Developmental (SRD) model to explore how children and adolescents reason about social inclusion and exclusion, drawing on moral, social group, and psychological considerations. The role of bystanders in challenging social exclusion is highlighted, with a focus on promoting proactive bystander intervention to create inclusive environments. This review identifies age, group identity, group norms, intergroup contact, empathy, and theory of mind as key influences on children's and adolescents’ bystander reactions. It emphasizes that interventions promoting inclusive peer and school norms, confidence in intergroup contact, empathy, and social perspective-taking can foster inclusive environments and empower bystander action that challenges intergroup social exclusion.

Keyword(s): adolescents, bystander, children, intervention, prejudice, social inclusion
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-120920-041454
2024-12-09
2025-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/devpsych/6/1/annurev-devpsych-120920-041454.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-120920-041454&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abbott N, Cameron L. 2014.. What makes a young assertive bystander? The effect of intergroup contact, empathy, cultural openness, and in-group bias on assertive bystander intervention intentions. . J. Soc. Issues 70::167–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12053
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abbott N, Cameron L, Thompson J. 2020.. Evaluating the impact of a defender role-play intervention on adolescent's defender intentions and responses towards name-calling. . Sch. Psychol. Int. 41:(2):154–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034319893410
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aboud FE. 2008.. A social-cognitive developmental theory of prejudice. . In Handbook of Race, Racism, and the Developing Child, ed. SM Quintana, C McKown , pp. 55–71. Hoboken, NJ:: Wiley
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Abrams D, Rutland A. 2008.. The development of subjective group dynamics. . In Intergroup Attitudes and Relations in Childhood Through Adulthood, ed. SR Levy, M Killen , pp. 47–65. New York:: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Abrams D, Rutland A. 2011.. Children's understanding of deviance and group dynamics: the development of subjective group dynamics. . In Rebels In Groups: Dissent, Deviance, Difference and Defiance, ed. J Jetten, MJ Hornsey , pp. 135–57. Oxford, UK:: Wiley-Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Allport GW. 1954.. The Nature of Prejudice. New York:: Doubleday Anchor
     [Google Scholar]
  7. António R, Guerra R, Moleiro C. 2020.. Stay away or stay together? Social contagion, common identity, and bystanders’ interventions in homophobic bullying episodes. . Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 23:(1):127–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218782741
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bagci SC, Cameron L, Turner RN, Morais C, Carby A, et al. 2020.. Cross-ethnic friendship self-efficacy: a new predictor of cross-ethnic friendships among children. . Group Processes Intergroup Relat. 23:(7):1049–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219879219
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bagci SC, Rutland A, Kumashiro M, Smith PK, Blumberg H. 2014.. Are minority status children's cross-ethnic friendships beneficial in a multiethnic context?. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 32::233–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12028
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bagci S, Turnuklu A, Tercan M, Cameron L, Turner R. 2023.. Have some confidence in contact: Self-efficacy beliefs among children moderate the associations between cross-group friendships and outgroup attitudes. . J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 53::101–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12929
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bayram Özdemir S, Sun S, Korol L, Özdemir M, Stattin H. 2018.. Adolescents' engagement in ethnic harassment: prejudiced beliefs in social networks and classroom ethnic diversity. . J. Youth Adolesc. 47:(6):1151–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0795-0
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  12. Benner AD, Wang Y. 2017.. Racial/ethnic discrimination and adolescents’ well-being: the role of cross-ethnic friendships and friends’ experiences of discrimination. . Child Dev. 88:(2):493–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12606
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bigler RS, Liben LS. 2007.. Developmental intergroup theory: explaining and reducing children's social stereotyping and prejudice. . Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 16:(3):162–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00496.x
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  14. Birkett M, Espelage DL, Koenig BW. 2009.. LGB and questioning students in schools: the moderating effects of homophobic bullying and school climate on negative outcomes. . J. Youth Adolesc. 38:(7):989–1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9389-1
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bonilla-Silva E. 2021.. Racism Without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in America. Lantham, MD:: Rowman & Littlefield. , 6th ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Bucchianeri MM, Eisenberg ME, Neumark-Sztainer D. 2016.. Weightism, racism, classism, and sexism: shared forms of harassment in adolescents. . J. Adolesc. Health 59:(4):402–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.05.018
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Burkholder AR, Elenbaas L, Killen M. 2021.. Giving priority to race or wealth in peer group contexts involving social inclusion. . Dev. Psychol. 57:(5):651–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001178
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  18. Caravita SC, Di Blasio P, Salmivalli C. 2010.. Early adolescents’ participation in bullying: Is ToM involved?. J. Early Adolesc. 30::138–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431609342983
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chahar Mahali S, Sevigny PR. 2022.. Multicultural classrooms: culturally responsive teaching self-efficacy among a sample of Canadian preservice teachers. . Educ. Urban Soc. 54:(8):946–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131245211062526
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chu SY, Garcia S. 2014.. Culturally responsive teaching efficacy beliefs of in-service special education teachers. . Remedial Spec. Educ. 35:(4):218–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513520511
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  21. Cruz RA, Manchanda S, Firestone AR, Rodl JE. 2020.. An examination of teachers’ culturally responsive teaching self-efficacy. . Teach. Educ. Spec. Educ. 43:(3):197–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406419875194
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dahl A. 2019.. The science of early moral development: on defining, constructing, and studying morality from birth. . Adv. Child Dev. Behav. 56::1–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acdb.2018.11.001
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  23. Diemer MA, Rapa LJ, Voight AM, McWhirter EH. 2016.. Critical consciousness: a developmental approach to addressing marginalization and oppression. . Child Dev. Perspect. 10::216–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12193
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  24. Elenbaas L, Rizzo MT, Killen M. 2020.. A developmental-science perspective on social inequality. . Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 29:(6):610–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420964147
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  25. Feddes AR, Noack P, Rutland A. 2009.. Direct and extended friendship effects on minority and majority children's interethnic attitudes: a longitudinal study. . Child Dev. 80:(2):377–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01266.x
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  26. Frey KS, Pearson CR, Cohen D. 2015.. Revenge is seductive, if not sweet: why friends matter for prevention efforts. . J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 37::25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.08.002
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gay G. 2002.. Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. . J. Teach. Educ. 53:(2):106–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053002003
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gönültaş S, Argyri E, Yüksel A, McGuire L, Palmer S, et al. 2024.. Peer group norms affect adolescents' bystander judgments and reasoning. . Peace Confl. J. Peace Psychol. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Gönültaş S, Argyri EK, Yüksel AŞ, Palmer SB, McGuire L, et al. 2022.. British adolescents are more likely than children to support bystanders who challenge exclusion of immigrant peers. . Front. Psychol. 13::837276. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.837276
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gönültaş S, Mulvey KL. 2021.. The role of immigration background, intergroup processes, and social-cognitive skills in bystanders’ responses to bias-based bullying toward immigrants during adolescence. . Child Dev. 92::e296–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13476
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  31. Gönültaş S, Mulvey KL. 2023.. Do adolescents intervene in intergroup bias-based bullying? Bystander judgments and responses to intergroup bias-based bullying of refugees. . J. Res. Adolesc. 33::4–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12752
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  32. Grütter J, Dhakal S, Killen M. 2022.. Socioeconomic status biases among children and adolescents: the role of school diversity and teacher beliefs in Nepal. . Child Dev. 93::1475–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13796
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gutentag T, Horenczyk G, Tatr M. 2017.. Teachers’ approaches toward cultural diversity predict diversity-related burnout and self-efficacy. . J. Teach. Educ. 69:(4):408–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117714244
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hawkins DL, Pepler DJ, Craig WM. 2001.. Naturalistic observations of peer interventions in bullying. . Soc. Dev. 10:(4):512–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00170
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hitti A, Gönültaş S, Mulvey KL. 2023.. What motivates adolescent bystanders to intervene when immigrant youth are bullied?. J. Res. Adolesc. 33::603–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12829
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hitti A, Killen M. 2015.. Expectations about ethnic peer group inclusivity: the role of shared interests, group norms, and stereotypes. . Child Dev. 86:(5):1522–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12393
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kärnä A, Voeten M, Little TD, Poskiparta E, Kaljonen A, Salmivalli C. 2011.. A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program: grades 4–6. . Child Dev. 82::311–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01557.x
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  38. Killen M. 2024.. The inclusive classroom: making schools more welcoming for all can make for a fair and just society. . Sci. Am. 330:(5):52–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0524-52
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  39. Killen M, Burkholder AR, D'Esterre AP, Sims RN, Glidden J, et al. 2022.. Testing the effectiveness of the Developing Inclusive Youth program: a multisite randomized control trial. . Child Dev. 93::732–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13785
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  40. Killen M, Dahl A. 2021.. Moral reasoning enables developmental and societal change. . Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 16:(6):1209–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620964076
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  41. Killen M, Rutland A. 2011.. Children and Social Exclusion: Morality, Prejudice, and Group Identity. Oxford, UK:: Wiley-Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444396317
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Killen M, Rutland A. 2022.. Promoting fair and just school environments: developing inclusive youth. . Policy Insights Behav. Brain Sci. 9:(1):81–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/23727322211073795
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  43. Killen M, Rutland A, Abrams D, Mulvey KL, Hitti A. 2013.. Development of intra- and intergroup judgments in the context of moral and social-conventional norms. . Child Dev. 84::1063–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12011
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  44. Killen M, Rutland A, Ruck M. 2012.. Promoting equity and justice in childhood: policy implications. . Soc. Policy Rep. 25:(4):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2379-3988.2011.tb00069.x
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  45. Killen M, Smetana JG, eds. 2023.. Handbook of Moral Development. New York:: Routledge. , 3rd ed.. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003047247
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Malti T, Strohmeier D, Killen M. 2015.. The impact of onlooking and including bystander behavior on judgments and emotions regarding peer exclusion. . Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 33::295–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12090
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  47. McGuire L, Elenbaas L, Killen M, Rutland A. 2019.. The role of in-group norms and group status in children's and adolescents’ decisions to rectify resource inequalities. . Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 37:(3):309–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12274
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  48. McKeown S, Dixon J. 2017.. The “contact hypothesis”: critical reflections and future directions. . Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 11::e12295. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12295
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  49. Mulvey KL, Boswell C, Niehaus K. 2018.. You don't need to talk to throw a ball! Children's inclusion of language-outgroup members in behavioral and hypothetical scenarios. . Dev. Psychol. 54:(7):1372–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000531
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  50. Mulvey KL, Gönültaş S, Goff E, Irdam G, Carlson R, et al. 2019.. School and family factors predicting adolescent cognition regarding bystander intervention in response to bullying and victim retaliation. . J. Youth Adolesc. 48::581–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0941-3
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  51. Nesdale D. 2004.. Social identity processes and children's ethnic prejudice. . In The Development of the Social Self, ed. M Bennett, F Sani , pp. 219–45. New York:: Sage
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Nesdale D. 2008.. Peer group rejection and children's intergroup prejudice. . In Intergroup Attitudes and Relations in Childhood Through Adulthood, ed. SR Levy, M Killen , pp. 32–46. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Nucci L, Turiel E. 2009.. Capturing the complexity of moral development and education. . Mind Brain Educ. 3:(3):151–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2009.01065.x
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  54. Palmer SB, Cameron L, Rutland A, Blake B. 2017.. Majority- and minority-ethnic status adolescents’ bystander responses to racism in school. . J. Commun. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 27::374–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2313
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  55. Palmer SB, Filippou A, Argyri EK, Rutland A. 2022.. Minority- and majority-status bystander reactions to, and reasoning about, intergroup social exclusion. . J. Exp. Child Psychol. 214::105290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105290
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  56. Palmer SB, Gönültaş S, Yüksel AŞ, Argyi EK, McGuire L, et al. 2023.. Challenging the exclusion of immigrant peers. . Int. J. Behav. Dev. 47:(1):9–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/01650254221128275
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  57. Palmer SB, Rutland A, Cameron L. 2015.. The development of bystander intentions and social-moral reasoning about intergroup verbal aggression. . Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 33::419–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12092
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  58. Paolini S, Hewstone M, Cairns E, Voci A. 2004.. Effects of direct and indirect cross-group friendships on judgments of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland: the mediating role of an anxiety-reduction mechanism. . Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 30:(6):770–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203262848
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  59. Rizzo MT, Killen M. 2016.. Children's understanding of equity in the context of inequality. . Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 34:(4):569–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12150
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  60. Russell ST, Sinclair KO, Poteat VP, Koenig BW. 2012.. Adolescent health and harassment based on discriminatory bias. . Am. J. Public Health 102:(3):493–95. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300430
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  61. Rutland A. 2004.. The development and self-regulation of intergroup attitudes in children. . In The Development of the Social Self, ed. M Bennett, F Sani , pp. 261–80. East Sussex, UK:: Psychol. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Rutland A, Cameron L, Bennett L, Ferrell J. 2005a.. Interracial contact and racial constancy: a multi-site study of racial intergroup bias in 3–5 year old Anglo-British children. . J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 26::699–713. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2005.08.005
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  63. Rutland A, Cameron L, Milne A, McGeorge P. 2005b.. Social norms and self-presentation: children's implicit and explicit intergroup attitudes. . Child Dev. 76::451–66. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00856.x
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  64. Rutland A, Hitti A, Mulvey KL, Abrams D, Killen M. 2015.. When does the in-group like the out-group? Bias among children as a function of group norms. . Psychol. Sci. 26::834–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615572758
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  65. Rutland A, Killen M. 2015.. A developmental science approach to reducing prejudice and social exclusion: intergroup processes, social-cognitive development and moral reasoning. . Soc. Issues Policy Rev. 9::121–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12012
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  66. Rutland A, Killen M, Abrams D. 2010.. A new social-cognitive developmental perspective on prejudice: the interplay between morality and group identity. . Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 5::279–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610369468
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  67. Rutland A, Palmer SB, Yüksel AŞ, Grütter J. 2022.. Social exclusion: the interplay between morality and group processes. . In Handbook of Moral Development, ed. M Killen, JG Smetana , pp. 219–35. New York:: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Salmivalli C. 2010.. Bullying and the peer group: a review. . Aggress. Violent Behav. 15:(2):112–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  69. Sierksma J, Thijs J, Verkuyten M, Komter A. 2014.. Children's reasoning about the refusal to help: the role of need, costs, and social perspective taking. . Child Dev. 85:(3):1134–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12195
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  70. Sommerville JA. 2023.. Developing an early awareness of fairness. . In Handbook of Moral Development, ed. M Killen, JG Smetana , pp. 153–67. New York:: Routledge. , 3rd ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Tajfel H, Turner JC. 1986.. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. . In Psychology of Intergroup Relations, ed. S Worchel, WG Austin , pp. 7–24. Chicago:: Nelson Hall
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Tenenbaum HR, Ruck MD. 2012.. British adolescents’ and young adults’ understanding and reasoning about the religious and nonreligious rights of asylum-seeker youth. . Child Dev. 83:(3):1102–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01755.x
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  73. Thornberg R, Hunter SC, Hong JS, Rönnberg J. 2020.. Bullying among children and adolescents. . Scand. J. Psychol. 61::1–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12610
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  74. Tropp LR, O'Brien TC, Migacheva K. 2014.. How peer norms of inclusion and exclusion predict children's interest in cross-ethnic friendships. . J. Soc. Issues 70:(1):151–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12052
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  75. Turiel E. 2015.. Moral development. . In Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science: Theory and Method, ed. WF Overton, PCM Molenaar, RM Lerner , pp. 484–522. Wiley. , 7th ed.. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy113
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Turner RN, Cameron L. 2016.. Confidence in contact: a new perspective on promoting cross-group friendship among children and adolescents. . Soc. Issues Policy Rev. 10:(1):212–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12023
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  77. Turner RN, Hewstone M, Voci A. 2007.. Reducing explicit and implicit outgroup prejudice via direct and extended contact: the mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. . J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 93:(3):369–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.369
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  78. Verkuyten M, Steenhuis A. 2005.. Preadolescents’ understanding and reasoning about asylum seeker peers and friendships. . J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 26::660–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2005.08.002
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  79. Willems RA, Sapouna M, De Amicis L, Völlink T, Dehue F, et al. 2024.. Encouraging positive bystander responses to bias-based bullying in primary schools through a serious game approach: a non-randomized controlled evaluation of the ‘GATE-BULL’ program. . Int. J. Bullying Prev. 2024:. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-024-00243-8
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Wölfer R, Schmid K, Hewstone M, van Zalk M. 2016.. Developmental dynamics of intergroup contact and intergroup attitudes: long-term effects in adolescence and early adulthood. . Child Dev. 87::1466–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12598
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  81. Woo BM, Hamlin JK. 2023.. Evidence for an early-emerging moral core. . In Handbook of Moral Development, ed. M Killen, JG Smetana , pp. 168–83. New York:: Routledge. , 3rd ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Yüksel AŞ, Palmer SB, Argyri EK, Rutland A. 2022.. When do bystanders get help from teachers or friends? Age and group membership matter when indirectly challenging social exclusion. . Front. Psychol. 13::833589. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.833589
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  83. Yüksel AS, Palmer SB, Rutland A. 2021.. Developmental differences in bystander behavior toward intergroup and intragroup exclusion. . Dev. Psychol. 57::1342–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001202
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-120920-041454
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error