Animal Linguistics

Literature Cited

1. Abbott KR, Dukas R. 2009.. Honeybees consider flower danger in their waggle dance. . Anim. Behav. 78::633–35
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
2. Adams DC. 2008.. Phylogenetic meta-analysis. . Evolution 62::567–72
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
3. Albers AM, Kok P, Toni I, Dijkerman HC, de Lange FP. 2013.. Shared representations for working memory and mental imagery in early visual cortex. . Curr. Biol. 23::1427–31
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
4. Arbib MA, Liebal K, Pika S. 2008.. Primate vocalization, gesture, and the evolution of human language. . Curr. Anthropol. 49::1053–76
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
5. Arnold K, Zuberbühler K. 2006a.. Language evolution: semantic combinations in primate calls. . Nature 441::303
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
6. Arnold K, Zuberbühler K. 2006b.. The alarm-calling system of adult male putty-nosed monkeys, Cercopithecus nictitans martini. . Anim. Behav. 72::643–53
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
7. Arnold K, Zuberbühler K. 2008.. Meaningful call combinations in a non-human primate. . Curr. Biol. 18::R202–3
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
8. Arnold K, Zuberbühler K. 2012.. Call combinations in monkeys: compositional or idiomatic expressions?. Brain Lang. 120::303–9
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
9. Bateman PW, Fleming PA. 2011.. Who are you looking at? Hadeda ibises use direction of gaze, head orientation and approach speed in their risk assessment of a potential predator. . J. Zool. 285::316–23
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
10. Ben Mocha Y, Mundry R, Pika S. 2019.. Joint attention skills in wild Arabian babblers (Turdoides squamiceps): a consequence of cooperative breeding?. Proc. R. Soc. B 286::20190147
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
11. Berthet M, Coye C, Dezecache G, Kuhn J. 2023.. Animal linguistics: a primer. . Biol. Rev. 98::81–98
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
12. Berwick RC, Chomsky N. 2016.. Why Only Us: Language and Evolution. Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
13. Berwick RC, Chomsky N. 2019.. All or nothing: no half-Merge and the evolution of syntax. . PLOS Biol. 17::e3000539
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
14. Boeckx C. 2009.. The nature of Merge: consequences for language, mind, and biology. . In Of Minds & Language: A Dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Country, ed. M Piattelli-Palmarini, J Uriagereka, P Salaburu , pp. 44–57. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bolhuis JJ, Tattersall I, Chomsky N, Berwick RC. 2014.. How could language have evolved?. PLOS Biol. 12::e1001934
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
16. Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL. 2011.. Principles of Animal Communication. Sunderland, MA:: Sinauer Assoc. , 2nd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
17. Butterworth G, Grover L. 1988.. The origins of referential communication in human infancy. . In Thought without Language, ed. L Weiskrantz , pp. 5–24. Oxford, UK:: Clarendon Press/Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
18. Chomsky N. 1993.. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. . In The View from Building 20, ed. K Hare, K Keyser , pp. 1–52. Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
19. Clucas B, Marzluff JM, Mackovjak D, Palmquist I. 2013.. Do American crows pay attention to human gaze and facial expressions?. Ethology 119::296–302
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
20. Coye C, Ouattara K, Zuberbühler K, Lemasson A. 2015.. Suffixation influences receivers’ behaviour in non-human primates. . Proc. R. Soc. B 282::20150265
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
21. Cunha FCR, Griesser M. 2021.. Who do you trust? Wild birds use social knowledge to avoid being deceived. . Sci. Adv. 7::eaba2862
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
22. Darwin C. 1871.. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London:: John Murray
    [Google Scholar]
23. Davies NB, Krebs JR, West SA. 2012.. An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology. Hoboken, NJ:: John Wiley & Sons. , 4th ed..
    [Google Scholar]
24. de Boer B, Thompson B, Ravignani A, Boeckx C. 2020.. Evolutionary dynamics do not motivate a single-mutant theory of human language. . Sci. Rep. 10::451
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
25. Deshpande A, Van Boekholt B, Zuberbühler K. 2022.. Preliminary evidence for one-trial social learning of vervet monkey alarm calling. . R. Soc. Open Sci. 9::210560
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
26. Deshpande A, van de Waal E, Zuberbühler K. 2023.. Context-dependent alarm responses in wild vervet monkeys. . Anim. Cogn. 26::1199–208
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
27. Dhein K. 2023.. The cognitive map debate in insects: a historical perspective on what is at stake. . Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 98::63–79
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
28. Dufresne F, Herbert PDN. 1994.. Hybridization and origins of polyploidy. . Proc. R. Soc. B 258::141–46
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
29. Elias DO, Maddison WP, Peckmezian C, Girard MB, Mason AC. 2012.. Orchestrating the score: complex multimodal courtship in the Habronattus coecatus group of Habronattus jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae). . Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 105::522–47
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
30. Elias DO, Mason AC, Maddison WP, Hoy RR. 2003.. Seismic signals in a courting male jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae). . J. Exp. Biol. 206::4029–39
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
31. Engesser S, Ridley AR, Townsend SW. 2016.. Meaningful call combinations and compositional processing in the southern pied babbler. . PNAS 113::5976–81
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
32. Fernandez AA, Burchardt LS, Nagy M, Knörnschild M. 2021.. Babbling in a vocal learning bat resembles human infant babbling. . Science 373::923–26
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
33. Fisher SE, Scharff C. 2009.. FOXP2 as a molecular window into speech and language. . Trends Genet. 25::166–77
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
34. Fitch WT. 2010.. The Evolution of Language. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
35. Flower TP, Gribble M, Ridley AR. 2014.. Deception by flexible alarm mimicry in an African bird. . Science 344::513–16
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
36. Forder L, Lupyan G. 2019.. Hearing words changes color perception: facilitation of color discrimination by verbal and visual cues. . J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 148::1105–23
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
37. Fujita K. 2014.. Recursive Merge and human language evolution. . In Recursion: Complexity in Cognition, ed. T Roeper, M Speas , pp. 243–64. New York:: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
38. Fukui N. 2011.. Merge and bare phrase structure. . In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, ed. C Boeckx , pp. 73–95. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
39. Garamszegi LZ, Møller AP. 2010.. Effects of sample size and intraspecific variation in phylogenetic comparative studies: a meta-analytic review. . Biol. Rev. 85::797–805
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
40. Gardner RA, Gardner BT, Van Cantfort TE. 1989.. Teaching Sign Language to Chimpanzees. New York:: SUNY Press
    [Google Scholar]
41. Haesler S, Rochefort C, Georgi B, Licznerski P, Osten P, Scharff C. 2007.. Incomplete and inaccurate vocal imitation after knockdown of FoxP2 in songbird basal ganglia nucleus area X. . PLOS Biol. 5::e321
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
42. Hains SM, Muir DW. 1996.. Infant sensitivity to adult eye direction. . Child. Dev. 67::1940–51
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
43. Hauser MD, Chomsky N, Fitch WT. 2002.. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?. Science 298::1569–79
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
44. Higham JP, Hebets EA. 2013.. An introduction to multimodal communication. . Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 67::1381–88
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
45. Hillert DG. 2015.. On the evolving biology of language. . Front. Psychol. 6::1796
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
46. Hockett CF. 1960.. The origin of speech. . Sci. Am. 203::88–97
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
47. Hornstein N. 2009.. A Theory of Syntax: Minimal Operations and Universal Grammar. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
48. Hurford JR. 2007.. The Origins of Meaning: Language in the Light of Evolution. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
49. Hurford JR. 2012.. The Origins of Grammar: Language in the Light of Evolution II. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
50. Kano F, Call J. 2014.. Cross-species variation in gaze following and conspecific preference among great apes, human infants and adults. . Anim. Behav. 91::137–50
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
51. Kaplan G. 2011.. Pointing gesture in a bird—merely instrumental or a cognitively complex behavior?. Curr. Zool. 57::453–67
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
52. Kecskes I, Horn LR. 2007.. Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive and Intercultural Aspects. Berlin:: Walter de Gruyter
    [Google Scholar]
53. Kok P, Mostert P, de Lange FP. 2017.. Prior expectations induce prestimulus sensory templates. . PNAS 114::10473–78
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
54. Laine V, Gossmann T, Schachtschneider K, et al. 2016.. Evolutionary signals of selection on cognition from the great tit genome and methylome. . Nat. Commun. 7::10474
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
55. Lameira AR, Call J. 2018.. Time-space-displaced responses in the orangutan vocal system. . Sci. Adv. 4::eaau3401
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
56. Lee S-H, Kravitz DJ, Baker CI. 2012.. Disentangling visual imagery and perception of real-world objects. . NeuroImage 59::4064–73
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
57. León J, Thiriau C, Bodin C, Crockford C, Zuberbühler K. 2022.. Acquisition of predator knowledge from alarm calls via one-trial social learning in monkeys. . iScience 25::104853
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
58. Leroux M, Schel AM, Wilke C, Chandia B, Zuberbühler K, et al. 2023.. Call combinations and compositional processing in wild chimpanzees. . Nat. Commun. 14::2225
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
59. Lord C. 2013.. Aristotle's Politics. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press. , 2nd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
60. Lorenz K. 1952.. King Solomon's Ring: New Light on Animal Ways. Springfield, OH:: Crowell
    [Google Scholar]
61. Lupyan G, Ward EJ. 2013.. Language can boost otherwise unseen objects into visual awareness. . PNAS 110::14196–201
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
62. Macedonia JM, Evans CS. 1993.. Variation among mammalian alarm call systems and the problem of meaning in animal signals. . Ethology 93::177–97
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
63. Magrath RD, Haff TM, Horn AG, Leonard ML. 2010.. Calling in the face of danger: predation risk and acoustic communication by parent birds and their offspring. . Adv. Study Behav. 41::187–253
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
64. Magrath RD, Haff TM, Fallow PM, Radford AN. 2015a.. Eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls: from mechanisms to consequences. . Biol. Rev. 90::560–86
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
65. Magrath RD, Haff TM, McLachlan JR, Igic B. 2015b.. Wild birds learn to eavesdrop on heterospecific alarm calls. . Curr. Biol. 25::2047–50
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
66. McNeill D. 1996.. Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal About Thought. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
67. McNeill D. 2005.. Gesture and Thought. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
68. Menzel R. 2023.. Navigation and dance communication in honeybees: a cognitive perspective. . J. Comp. Physiol. A 209::515–27
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
69. Moore C. 1999.. Gaze following and the control of attention. . In Early Social Cognition: Understanding Others in the First Months of Life, ed. P Rochat , pp. 241–56. Mahwah, NJ:: Erlbaum
    [Google Scholar]
70. Ouattara K, Lemasson A, Zuberbühler K. 2009a.. Campbell's monkeys concatenate vocalizations into context-specific call sequences. . PNAS 106::22026–31
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
71. Ouattara K, Lemasson A, Zuberbühler K. 2009b.. Campbell's monkeys use affixation to alter call meaning. . PLOS ONE 4::e7808
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
72. Partan SR, Marler P. 2005.. Issues in the classification of multimodal communication signals. . Am. Nat.  166::231–45
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
73. Pearson J, Naselaris T, Holmes EA, Kosslyn SM. 2015.. Mental imagery: functional mechanisms and clinical applications. . Trends Cogn. Sci. 19::590–602
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
74. Pelletier FJ. 1994.. The principle of semantic compositionality. . Topoi 13::11–24
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
75. Phillips AT, Wellman HM, Spelke ES. 2002.. Infants’ ability to connect gaze and emotional expression to intentional action. . Cognition 85::53–78
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
76. Pika S, Bugnyar T. 2011.. The use of referential gestures in ravens (Corvus corax) in the wild. . Nat. Commun. 2::560
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
77. Pika S, Mitani JC. 2006.. Referential gesturing in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). . Curr. Biol. 16::191–92
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
78. Potvin DA, Ratnayake CP, Radford AN, Magrath RD. 2018.. Birds learn socially to recognize heterospecific alarm calls by acoustic association. . Curr. Biol. 28::R892–94
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
79. Prather JF, Okanoya K, Bolhuis JJ. 2017.. Brains for birds and babies: neural parallels between birdsong and speech acquisition. . Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 81:(Part B):225–37
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
80. Price T, Wadewitz P, Cheney D, Seyfarth R, Hammerschmidt K, Fischer J. 2015.. Vervets revisited: a quantitative analysis of alarm call structure and context specificity. . Sci. Rep. 5::13220
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
81. Raff RA. 2000.. Evo-devo: the evolution of a new discipline. . Nat. Rev. Genet. 1::74–79
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
82. Ravignani A, Garcia M. 2022.. A cross-species framework to identify vocal learning abilities in mammals. . Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 377::20200394
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
83. Rendall D, Owren MJ, Ryan MJ. 2009.. What do animal signals mean?. Anim. Behav. 78::233–40
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
84. Rivas E. 2005.. Recent use of signs by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in interactions with humans. . J. Comp. Psychol. 119::404–17
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
85. Scharff C, Petri J. 2011.. Evo-devo, deep homology and FoxP2: implications for the evolution of speech and language. . Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 366::2124–40
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
86. Schlenker P, Chemla E, Schel AM, Fuller J, Gautier J-P, et al. 2016a.. Formal monkey linguistics. . Theor. Linguist. 42::1–90
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
87. Schlenker P, Chemla E, Schel AM, Fuller J, Gautier J-P, et al. 2016b.. Formal monkey linguistics: the debate. . Theor. Linguist. 42::173–201
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
88. Scott-Phillips TC. 2015.. Nonhuman primate communication, pragmatics, and the origins of language. . Curr. Anthropol. 56::56–80
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
89. Serres MH, Kerr AR, McCormack TJ, Riley M. 2009.. Evolution by leaps: gene duplication in bacteria. . Biol. Direct 4::46
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
90. Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL, Bergman T, Fischer J, Zuberbühler K, Hammerschmidt K. 2010.. The central importance of information in studies of animal communication. . Anim. Behav. 80::3–8
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
91. Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL, Marler P. 1980.. Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: evidence of predator classification and semantic communication. . Science 210::801–3
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
92. Shultz S, Dunbar RIM. 2006.. Both social and ecological factors predict ungulate brain size. . Proc. R. Soc. B 273::207–15
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
93. Struhsaker TT. 1967.. Auditory communication among vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops). . In Social Communication Among Primates, ed. S Altmann , pp. 281–324. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
94. Suzuki TN. 2011.. Parental alarm calls warn nestlings about different predatory threats. . Curr. Biol. 21::R15–16
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
95. Suzuki TN. 2012a.. Referential mobbing calls elicit different predator-searching behaviours in Japanese great tits. . Anim. Behav. 84::53–57
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
96. Suzuki TN. 2012b.. Long-distance calling by the willow tit, Poecile montanus, facilitates formation of mixed-species foraging flocks. . Ethology 118::10–16
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
97. Suzuki TN. 2014.. Communication about predator type by a bird using discrete, graded and combinatorial variation in alarm calls. . Anim. Behav. 87::59–65
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
98. Suzuki TN. 2015.. Assessment of predation risk through referential communication in incubating birds. . Sci. Rep. 5::10239
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
99. Suzuki TN. 2016.. Semantic communication in birds: evidence from field research over the past two decades. . Ecol. Res. 31::307–19
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
100. Suzuki TN. 2018.. Alarm calls evoke a visual search image of a predator in birds. . PNAS 115::1541–45
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
101. Suzuki TN. 2019.. Imagery in wild birds: retrieval of visual information from referential alarm calls. . Learn. Behav. 47::111–14
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
102. Suzuki TN. 2020.. Other species’ alarm calls evoke a predator-specific search image in birds. . Curr. Biol. 30::2616–20
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
103. Suzuki TN. 2021.. Animal linguistics: exploring referentiality and compositionality in bird calls. . Ecol. Res. 36::221–31
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
104. Suzuki TN, Kutsukake N. 2017.. Foraging intention affects whether willow tits call to attract members of mixed-species flocks. . R. Soc. Open Sci. 4::170222
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
105. Suzuki TN, Matsumoto YK. 2022.. Experimental evidence for core-Merge in the vocal communication system of a wild passerine. . Nat. Commun. 13::5605
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
106. Suzuki TN, Sugita N. 2024.. The ‘after you’ gesture in a bird. . Curr. Biol. 34::R231–32
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
107. Suzuki TN, Wheatcroft D, Griesse M. 2016.. Experimental evidence for compositional syntax in bird calls. . Nat. Commun. 7::10986
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
108. Suzuki TN, Wheatcroft D, Griesser M. 2017.. Wild birds use an ordering rule to decode novel call sequences. . Curr. Biol. 27::2331–36
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
109. Suzuki TN, Wheatcroft D, Griesser M. 2019.. The syntax–semantics interface in animal vocal communication. . Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 375::20180405
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
110. Terrace HS, Petitto LA, Sanders RJ, Bever TG. 1979.. Can an ape create a sentence?. Science 206::891–902
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
111. Tomasello M. 1999.. The human adaptation for Culture. . Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 28::509–29
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
112. Townsend SW, Manser MB. 2013.. Functionally referential communication in mammals: the past, present and the future. . Ethology 119::1–11
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
113. Vail L, Manica A, Bshary R. 2013.. Referential gestures in fish collaborative hunting. . Nat. Commun. 4::1765
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
114. Vernes SC, Kriengwatana BP, Beeck VC, Fischer J, Tyack PL, et al. 2021.. The multi-dimensional nature of vocal learning. . Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 376::20200236
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
115. von Frisch K. 1967.. The Dance Language and Orientation of Bees. Cambridge, MA:: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
116. Wilke C, Lahiff NJ, Sabbid KH, Watts DP, Townsend SW, Slocombe KE. 2022.. Declarative referential gesturing in a wild chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). . PNAS 11::e2206486119
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
117. Yang C. 2013.. Ontogeny and phylogeny of language. . PNAS 110::6324–27
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
118. Zhang Y, Zhou L, Zuo J, Wang S, Meng W. 2023.. Analogies of human speech and bird song: from vocal learning behavior to its neural basis. . Front. Psychol. 14::1100969
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
119. Zuberbühler K. 2000.. Interspecific semantic communication in two forest monkeys. . Proc. R. Soc. B 267::713–18
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
120. Zuberbühler K, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM. 1999.. Conceptual semantics in a nonhuman primate. . J. Comp. Psychol. 113::33–42
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]