1932

Abstract

This article evaluates a body of recent work that uses field and natural experiments to answer the question of whether informed voters can enforce better governance. A common finding in the literature is that voter behavior is malleable and that information about the political process and politician performance improves electoral accountability. Limited availability of information thus provides one explanation for the persistence of low-quality politicians and the existence of identity politics and electoral malpractices in low-income democracies. Understanding how voters can gain access to credible sources of information and understanding how politicians react to improved information about their performance are promising avenues for future research.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-061109-080154
2011-09-04
2024-11-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/economics/3/1/annurev-economics-061109-080154.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-061109-080154&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Acemoglu D. 2010. Theory, general equilibrium and political economy in development economics. J. Econ. Perspect. 24:(3)1732 [Google Scholar]
  2. Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson JA. 2001. The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation. Am. Econ. Rev. 91:(5)1369401 [Google Scholar]
  3. Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson JA, Yared P. 2008. Income and democracy. Am. Econ. Rev. 98:(3)80842 [Google Scholar]
  4. Acemoglu D, Robinson J, Santos-Villagran R. 2010. The monopoly of violence: evidence from Colombia Work. Pap., Mass. Inst. Technol [Google Scholar]
  5. Almond G, Verba S. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations London: Sage [Google Scholar]
  6. Banerjee A, Green D, Green J, Pande R. 2010a. Can voters be primed to choose better legislators? Experimental evidence from rural India Work. Pap., Mass. Inst. Technol [Google Scholar]
  7. Banerjee A, Kumar S, Pande R, Su F. 2010b. Do informed voters make better choices? Experimental evidence from urban India Work. Pap., Mass. Inst. of Technol [Google Scholar]
  8. Banerjee AV, Pande R. 2009. Parochial politics: ethnic preferences and politician corruption Unpublished manuscript, Harvard Univ [Google Scholar]
  9. Banfield E, Wilson J. 1966. City Politics Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  10. Bardhan P, Mookherjee D. 2000. Capture and governance at local and national levels. Am. Econ. Rev. 90:(2)13539 [Google Scholar]
  11. Barro R. 1970. The control of politicians: an economic model. Public Choice 14:1942 [Google Scholar]
  12. Beaman L, Chattopadhyay R, Duflo E, Pande R, Topalova P. 2009. Powerful women: Does exposure reduce bias?. Q. J. Econ. 124:(4)1497540 [Google Scholar]
  13. Beaman L, Duflo E, Pande R, Topalova P. 2011.Political reservation and substantive representation: evidence from Indian panchayats India Policy Forum Washington, DC: Brookings Inst In press [Google Scholar]
  14. Besley T. 2006. Principled Agents? The Political Economy of Good Government Lindahl Lect. New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  15. Besley T, Burgess R. 2002. The political economy of government responsiveness: theory and evidence from India. Q. J. Econ. 117:(4)141552 [Google Scholar]
  16. Besley T, Pande R, Rao V. 2007. Just rewards? Local politics and public resource allocation in South India Work. Pap., London School Econ [Google Scholar]
  17. Bhavnani RR. 2009. Do electoral quotas work after they are withdrawn? Evidence from a natural experiment in India. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 103:(1)2335 [Google Scholar]
  18. Blais A, Dobrynska A. 1998. Turnout in electoral democracies. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 33:(3)23961 [Google Scholar]
  19. Blaydes L. 2006. Who votes in authoritarian elections and why? Determinants of voter turnout in contemporary Egypt Presented at the Annu. Meet. Am. Polit. Sci. Assoc Philadelphia, Penn: [Google Scholar]
  20. Bloom H, Price D. 1975. Voter response to short run economic conditions: the asymmetric effect of prosperity and recession. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 69:125460 [Google Scholar]
  21. Bobnis G, Fuertes LC. 2009. Does exposing corrupt politicians reduce corruption? Work. Pap., Univ. Toronto [Google Scholar]
  22. Brady H, Verba S, Schlozman KL. 1995. Beyond SES: a resource model of political participation. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 82:(2)27194 [Google Scholar]
  23. Bratton M. 2008. Vote buying and violence in Nigerian election campaigns. Elect. Stud. 27:(4)62132 [Google Scholar]
  24. Brusco V, Nazereno M, Stokes S. 2004. Vote buying in Argentina. Lat. Am. Res. Rev. 39:(2)6688 [Google Scholar]
  25. Chattopadhyay R, Duflo E. 2004. Women as policy makers: evidence from a randomized policy experiment in India. Econometrica 72:(5)140943 [Google Scholar]
  26. Chong A, De La O AL, Karlan D, Wantchekeon L. 2010. Information dissemination and local governments' electoral returns: evidence from a field experiment in Mexico Work. Pap., Inter-Am. Dev. Bank Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  27. Collier P, Vicente P. 2008. Votes and violence: evidence from a field experiment in Nigeria Work. Pap., Cent. Study Afr. Econ [Google Scholar]
  28. Cox GW, Kousser JM. 1981. Turnout and rural corruption: New York as a test case. Am. J. Pol. Sci. 25:(4)64363 [Google Scholar]
  29. De La O AL. 2009. Do conditional cash transfers affect electoral behavior? Evidence from a randomized experiment in Mexico Unpublished manuscript, Yale Univ [Google Scholar]
  30. Djankov S, Porta RL, de Silanes FL, Shleifer A. 2010. Disclosure by politicians. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ 2:(2)179209 [Google Scholar]
  31. Edlund L, Haider L, Pande R. 2005. Unmarried parenthood and redistributive politics. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 3:(1)95119 [Google Scholar]
  32. Edlund L, Pande R. 2002. Why have women become left-wing? The political gender gap and the decline in marriage. Q. J. Econ. 117:(4)91761 [Google Scholar]
  33. Feddersen T, Pesendorfer W. 1997. Voting behavior and information aggregation in elections with private information. Econometrica 65:(5)102958 [Google Scholar]
  34. Ferejohn J. 1986. Incumbent performance and electoral control. Public Choice 50:525 [Google Scholar]
  35. Ferraz C, Finan F. 2008. Exposing corrupt politicians: the effect of Brazil's publicly released audits on electoral outcomes. Q. J. Econ. 123:(2)70345 [Google Scholar]
  36. Finan F, Ferraz C. 2009. Political power persistence and economic development: evidence from Brazil's regime transition Work. Pap., Pontificia Univ. Cathol. Rio de Janeiro [Google Scholar]
  37. Finan F, Schecter L. 2010. Vote-buying and reciprocity Unpublished manuscript, Univ. Calif Berkeley: [Google Scholar]
  38. Fornos C, Power T, Garand J. 2004. Explaining voter turnout in Latin America, 1980 to 2000. Comp. Polit. Stud. 37:(8)90940 [Google Scholar]
  39. Gentzkow M. 2006. Television and voter turnout. Q. J. Econ. 121:(3)93172 [Google Scholar]
  40. Gerber A, Green D. 2000. The effects of canvassing, telephone calls, and direct mail on voter turnout: a field experiment. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 94:(3)65363 [Google Scholar]
  41. Gine X, Mansuri G. 2010. Together we will: evidence from a field experiment on female voter turnout in Pakistan Work. Pap.: World Bank, Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  42. Glaeser E, Ponzeto G, Shleifer A. 2007. Why does democracy need education?. J. Econ. Growth 12:(77)5973 [Google Scholar]
  43. Golden M, Tiwari D. 2009. Criminality and malfeasance among national legislators in contemporary India Work. Pap., Univ. Calif Los Angeles: [Google Scholar]
  44. Habyarimana J, Humphreys M, Posner D, Weinstein JM. 2007. Why does ethnic diversity undermine public goods provision?. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 101:(4)70925 [Google Scholar]
  45. Hall R, Jones C. 1999. Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others?. Q. J. Econ. 114:(1)83116 [Google Scholar]
  46. Horowitz DL. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  47. Huntington S, Nelson J. 1976. No Easy Choice: Political Participation in Developing Countries Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  48. Lijphart A. 1997. Unequal participation: democracy's unresolved dilemma. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 91:(1)114 [Google Scholar]
  49. Lipset S. 1959. Some social requisites of democracy: economic development and political legitimacy. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 53:(1)69105 [Google Scholar]
  50. Lizzeri A, Persico N. 2001. The provision of public goods under alternative electoral incentives. Am. Econ. Rev. 91:(1)69105 [Google Scholar]
  51. Mauro P. 1995. Corruption and growth. Q. J. Econ. 110:(3)681712 [Google Scholar]
  52. Miguel E, Gugerty MK. 2005. Ethnic diversity, social sanctions, and public goods in Kenya. J. Public Econ. 89:(11–12)232568 [Google Scholar]
  53. Milligan K, Moretti E, Oreopoulos P. 2004. Does education improve citizenship? Evidence from the U.S and the U.K. J. Public Econ. 88:(3)166795 [Google Scholar]
  54. Nichter S. 2008. Vote buying or turnout buying? Machine politics and the secret ballot. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 102:(1)1931 [Google Scholar]
  55. Norris P, Mattes R. 2003. Does ethnicity determine support for the governing party? Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Polit. Sci. Assoc Philadelphia, Penn: [Google Scholar]
  56. Olken B. 2007. Monitoring corruption: evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. J. Polit. Econ. 115:(2)20049 [Google Scholar]
  57. Olken B. 2010. Direct democracy and local public goods: evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 93:(2)24367 [Google Scholar]
  58. Pande R. 2004. Can mandated political representation provide disadvantaged minorities policy influence? Theory and evidence from India. Am. Econ. Rev. 94:(4)113251 [Google Scholar]
  59. Pande R, Udry C. 2005.Institutions and development: a view from below Proc. 9th World Congr. Econom. Soc. Blundell R, Newey W, Persson T. 349403 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  60. Persson T, Roland G, Tabellini G. 1997. Separation of powers and political accountability. Q. J. Econ. 112:(4)1163202 [Google Scholar]
  61. Posner D, Eifert B, Miguel E. 2010. Political competition and ethnic identification in Africa. Am. J. Pol. Sci. 54:(2)494510 [Google Scholar]
  62. Powell BG Jr. 1986. American voter turnout in comparative perspective. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 80:(1)1743 [Google Scholar]
  63. Scott J. 1969. Corruption, machine politics, and political change. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 63:(4)114258 [Google Scholar]
  64. Simpser A. 2008. Cheating big: on the logic of electoral corruption in developing countries Work. Pap., Univ. Chicago [Google Scholar]
  65. Snyder J, Stromberg D. 2010. Press coverage and electoral accountability. J. Polit. Econ. 118:(1)355408 [Google Scholar]
  66. Stokes S. 2005. Perverse accountability: a formal model of machine politics with evidence from Argentina. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 99:(3)31525 [Google Scholar]
  67. Stromberg D. 2004. Radio's impact on public spending. Q. J. Econ. 119:(1)189221 [Google Scholar]
  68. World Bank 2008. Governance matters, worldwide governance indicators, 1996–2008 http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/WBI/EXTWBIGOVANTCOR/0,,contentMDK:21889763~pagePK:64168445~piPK:64168309~theSitePK:1740530,00.html [Google Scholar]
  69. United Nations Dev. Prog. (UNDP) 2002. Human Development Report 2002: Deepening Democracy in a Fragmented World New York: Oxford Univ. Press http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr2002/ [Google Scholar]
  70. UN Women Canada 2010. United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women National Committee Canada http://www.unwomencanada.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=39&Itemid=50 [Google Scholar]
  71. Wantchekon L. 2003. Clientelism and voting behavior: evidence from a field experiment in Benin. World Polit. 55:(3)399422 [Google Scholar]
  72. Wantchekon L. 2009. Can informed public deliberation overcome clientelism? Experimental evidence from Benin Work. Pap., New York Univ [Google Scholar]
  73. Wilkinson S. 2004. Votes and Violence: Electoral Competition and Ethnic Riots in India Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  74. Wolfinger R, Rosenstone S. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-061109-080154
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-061109-080154
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error