1932

Abstract

The premise of this article is that an understanding of psychology and other social science disciplines can inform the effectiveness of the economic tools traditionally deployed in carrying out the functions of government, which include remedying market failures, redistributing income, and collecting tax revenue. An understanding of psychology can also lead to the development of different policy tools that better motivate desired behavior change or that are more cost-effective than traditional policy tools. The article outlines a framework for thinking about the psychology of behavior change in the context of market failures. It then describes the research on the effects of a variety of interventions rooted in an understanding of psychology that have policy-relevant applications. The article concludes by discussing how an understanding of psychology can also inform the use and design of traditional policy tools for behavior change, such as financial incentives.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-041033
2014-08-02
2024-07-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/economics/6/1/annurev-economics-080213-041033.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-041033&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abadie A, Gay S. 2006. The impact of presumed consent legislation on cadaveric organ donation: a cross-country study. J. Health Econ. 25:599–620 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alcott H. 2011. Social norms and energy conservation. J. Public Econ. 95:1082–95 [Google Scholar]
  3. Alcott H, Rogers T. 2014. The short-run and long-run effects of behavior interventions: experimental evidence from energy conservation. Am. Econ. Rev. In press [Google Scholar]
  4. Ashraf N, Aycinena D, Martinez C, Yang D. 2011. Remittances and the problem of control: a field experiment among migrants from El Salvador. Work. Pap., Univ. Mich., Ann Arbor
  5. Ashraf N, Karlan D, Yin W. 2006. Tying Odysseus to the mast: evidence from a commitment savings product in the Philippines. Q. J. Econ. 121:635–72 [Google Scholar]
  6. Austin J, Sigurdsson SO, Rubin YS. 2006. An examination of the effects of delayed versus immediate prompts on safety belt use. Environ. Behav. 38:140–49 [Google Scholar]
  7. Barr MS, Mullainathan S, Shafir E. 2013. Behaviorally informed regulation. Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy, ed. E Shafir, pp. 440–64. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  8. Behav. Insights Team 2012. Applying behavioural insights to reduce fraud, error and debt. Work. Pap., UK Cabinet Off., London
  9. Bell C. 2013. Inside the coalition’s controversial ‘Nudge Unit.’ The Telegraph, Feb. 11
  10. Benartzi S, Thaler RH. 2001. Naive diversification strategies in defined contribution savings plans. Am. Econ. Rev. 91:79–98 [Google Scholar]
  11. Benhassine N, Devoto F, Duflo E, Dupas P, Pouliquen V. 2013. Turning a shove into a nudge? A ‘labeled cash transfer’ for education. NBER Work. Pap. 19227
  12. Beshears J, Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC. 2008. The importance of default options for retirement savings outcomes: evidence from the United States. Lessons from Pension Reform in the Americas Kay SJ, Sinha T. 59–87 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  13. Beshears J, Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC, Weller B. 2010. Public policy and saving for retirement: the “autosave” features of the Pension Protection Act of 2006. Better Living Through Economics: How Economic Research Improves Our Lives Siegfried J. 274–90 Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  14. Beshears J, Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC. 2013a. Active choice and health care costs: evidence from home delivery for prescription drugs. Work. Pap., Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA
  15. Beshears J, Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC. 2013b. Simplification and saving. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 95:130–45 [Google Scholar]
  16. Beshears J, Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC, Milkman KL. 2013c. The effect of providing peer information on retirement savings decisions. Work. Pap., Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA
  17. Bettinger EP, Long BT, Oreopoulos P, Sanbonmatsu L. 2012. The role of application assistance and information in college decisions: results from the H&R Block FAFSA experiment. Q. J. Econ. 127:1–38 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bhargava S, Manoli D. 2011. Why are benefits left on the table? Assessing the role of information, complexity, and stigma on take-up with an IRS field experiment. Work. Pap., Univ. Tex., Austin
  19. Bloom H, Schwartz S, Lui-Gurr S, Lee S, Peng J, Bancroft W. 2001. Testing a financial incentive to promote re-employment among displaced workers: the Canadian Earnings Supplement Project (ESP). J. Policy Anal. Manag. 20:505–23 [Google Scholar]
  20. Briss PA, Rodewald LE, Hinman AR, Shefer AM, Strikas RA et al. 2000. Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to improve vaccination coverage in children, adolescents, and adults. Am. J. Prev. Med. 18:Suppl.97–140 [Google Scholar]
  21. Brune L, Gine X, Goldberg J, Yang D. 2011. Commitments to save: a field experiment in rural Malawi. Work. Pap., World Bank, Washington, DC
  22. Bryan CJ, Adams GS, Monin B. 2013. When cheating would make you a cheater: Implicating self prevents unethical behavior. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 142:1001–5 [Google Scholar]
  23. Bryan CJ, Walton GM, Roger T, Dweck CS. 2011. Motivating voter turnout by invoking the self. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108:12653–56 [Google Scholar]
  24. Bryan G, Karlan D, Nelson S. 2010. Commitment devices. Annu. Rev. Econ. 2:671–98 [Google Scholar]
  25. Campbell JY, Jackson HE, Madrian BC, Tufano P. 2011. Consumer financial protection. J. Econ. Perspect. 25:191–114 [Google Scholar]
  26. Carroll G, Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC, Metrick A. 2009. Optimal defaults and active decisions: theory and evidence from 401(k) saving. Q. J. Econ. 124:1639–74 [Google Scholar]
  27. Chapman GB, Li M, Colby H, Yoon H. 2010. Opting in vs. opting out of influenza vaccination. JAMA 304:43–44 [Google Scholar]
  28. Chetty R, Friedman JN, Leth-Petersen S, Nielsen T, Olsen T. 2014. Active vs. passive decisions and crowd-out in retirement savings accounts: evidence from Denmark. Q. J. Econ. 129: In press. [Google Scholar]
  29. Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC. 2010. Why does the law of one price fail? An experiment on index mutual funds.. Rev. Financ. Stud. 23:1405–32 [Google Scholar]
  30. Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC, Metrick A. 2004. For better or for worse: default effects and 401(k) savings behavior. Perspectives on the Economics of Aging Wise D. 81–121 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  31. Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC, Metrick A. 2006. Saving for retirement on the path of least resistance. Behavioral Public Finance: Toward a New Agenda McCaffrey EJ, Slemrod J. 304–51 New York: Russell Sage Found. [Google Scholar]
  32. Congdon WJ, Kling JR, Mullainathan S. 2011. Policy and Choice Washington, DC: Brookings Inst [Google Scholar]
  33. Costa DL, Kahn ME. 2013. Energy conservation “nudges” and environmentalist ideology: evidence from a randomized residential electricity field experiment. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 11:680–702 [Google Scholar]
  34. Darby S. 2006. The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption: a review for DEFRA of the literature on metering, billing, and direct displays. Work. Pap., Environ. Change Inst., Univ. Oxford, UK
  35. DellaVigna S. 2009. Psychology and economics: evidence from the field. J. Econ. Lit. 47:2315–72 [Google Scholar]
  36. Duarte F, Hastings JS. 2012. Fettered consumers and sophisticated firms: evidence from Mexico’s privatized social security market. NBER Work. Pap. 18582
  37. Duckworth AL, Grant H, Loew B, Oettingen G, Gollwitzer PM. 2011. Self-regulation strategies improve self-discipline in adolescents: benefits of mental contrasting and implementation intensions. Educ. Psychol. 31:17–26 [Google Scholar]
  38. Duflo E, Hanna R, Ryan S. 2012. Incentives work: getting teachers to come to school. Am. Econ. Rev. 102:1241–78 [Google Scholar]
  39. Duflo E, Kremer M, Robinson J. 2011. Nudging farmers to use fertilizer: theory and experimental evidence from Kenya. Am. Econ. Rev. 101:2350–90 [Google Scholar]
  40. Dupas P, Robinson J. 2013. Why don’t the poor save more? Evidence from health savings experiments. Am. Econ. Rev. 103:1138–71 [Google Scholar]
  41. Dynarski SM. 2000. Hope for whom? Financial aid for the middle class and its impact on college attendance. Natl. Tax J. 53:629–61 [Google Scholar]
  42. Dynarski SM. 2003. Does aid matter? Measuring the effect of student aid on college attendance and completion. Am. Econ. Rev. 93:278–88 [Google Scholar]
  43. Dynarski SM, Scott-Clayton J. 2006. The cost and complexity in federal student aid: lessons from optimal tax theory and behavioral economics. Natl. Tax J. 59:319–56 [Google Scholar]
  44. Engström P, Nordblom K, Ohlsson H, Persson A. 2013. Tax compliance and loss aversion. Work. Pap., Dep. Econ., Uppsala Univ.
  45. Filiz-Ozbay E, Guryan J, Hyndman K, Kearney M, Ozbay E. 2013. Do lottery payments induce savings behavior? Evidence from the lab. NBER Work. Pap. 19130
  46. Fox CR, Ratner RK, Lieb DS. 2005. How subjective grouping of options influences choice and allocation: diversification bias and the phenomenon of partition dependence. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 134:538–51 [Google Scholar]
  47. Frey B, Oberholzer-Gee F. 1997. The cost of price incentives: an empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out. Am. Econ. Rev. 87:746–55 [Google Scholar]
  48. Fryer R. 2011. Financial incentives and student achievement: evidence from randomized trials. Q. J. Econ. 126:1755–98 [Google Scholar]
  49. Fryer R, Levitt S, List JA, Sadoff S. 2012. Enhancing the efficacy of teacher incentives through loss aversion: a field experiment. NBER Work. Pap. 18237
  50. Gabaix X, Laibson D. 2006. Shrouded attributes, consumer myopia, and information suppression in competitive markets. Q. J. Econ. 121:505–40 [Google Scholar]
  51. Gerber AS, Green DW, Larimer CW. 2008. Social pressure and voter turnout: evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 102:33–48 [Google Scholar]
  52. Gerber AS, Rogers T. 2009. Descriptive social norms and motivation to vote: Everybody’s voting and so should you. J. Polit. 71:178–91 [Google Scholar]
  53. Glewwe P, Ilias N, Kremer M. 2010. Teacher incentives. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 2:3205–27 [Google Scholar]
  54. Gneezy U, Rustichini A. 2000a. A fine is a price. J. Legal Stud. 29:1–17 [Google Scholar]
  55. Gneezy U, Rustichini A. 2000b. Pay enough or don’t pay at all. Q. J. Econ. 115:791–810 [Google Scholar]
  56. Goette L, Stutzer A. 2008. Blood donations and incentives: evidence from a field experiment. Work. Pap. 08-3, Fed. Reserve Bank Boston
  57. Gollwitzer P. 1999. Implementation intentions: strong effects of simple plans. Am. Psychol. 54:493–503 [Google Scholar]
  58. Gollwitzer PM, Sheeran P. 2006. Implementation intentions and goal achievement: a meta-analysis of effects and processes. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 38:69–119 [Google Scholar]
  59. Grant A, Gino F. 2010. A little thanks goes a long why: explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 98:946–55 [Google Scholar]
  60. Gugerty MK. 2007. You can’t save alone: commitment in rotating savings and credit associations in Kenya. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 55:251–82 [Google Scholar]
  61. Hansen WL. 1983. Impact of student financial aid on access. Proc. Acad. Polit. Sci. 35:284–96 [Google Scholar]
  62. Hastings JS, Weinstein JM. 2008. Information, school choice, and academic achievements: evidence from two experiments. Q. J. Econ. 123:1373–414 [Google Scholar]
  63. Ho D, Imai K. 2008. Estimating causal effects of ballot order from a randomized natural experiment: the California alphabet lottery, 1978–2002. Public Opin. Q. 72:2216–40 [Google Scholar]
  64. Johnson E, Goldstein D. 2003. Do defaults save lives?. Science 302:1338–39 [Google Scholar]
  65. Johnson E, Shu S, Dellaert BGC, Fox C, Goldstein D et al. 2012. Beyond nudges: tools of choice architecture. Mark. Lett. 23:487–504 [Google Scholar]
  66. Joint Comm. Tax 2013. Estimates of federal tax expenditures for fiscal years 2012–2017. Rep., Joint Comm. Tax, Washington, DC
  67. Just DR, Mancino L, Wansink B. 2007. Could behavioral economics help improve diet quality for nutrition assistance program participants? Econ. Res. Rep. 6391, US Dep. Agric., Washington, DC
  68. Just DR, Price J. 2013. Using incentives to encourage healthy eating in children. J. Hum. Resour. 48:855–72 [Google Scholar]
  69. Kahneman D, Tversky A. 1979. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263–92 [Google Scholar]
  70. Kahneman D, Tversky A. 1984. Choices, values, and frames. Am. Psychol. 39:341–50 [Google Scholar]
  71. Kamenica E. 2012. Behavioral economics and psychology of incentives. Annu. Rev. Econ. 4:427–52 [Google Scholar]
  72. Kane TJ. 1995. Rising public college tuition and college entry: How well do public subsidies promote access to college? NBER Work. Pap. 5164
  73. Karlan D, McConnell M, Mullainathan S, Zinman J. 2013. Getting to top of mind: how reminders increase saving. Work. Pap., Dartmouth Coll., Hanover, NH
  74. Kast F, Meier S, Pomeranz D. 2012. Under-savers anonymous: evidence on self-help groups and peer pressure as a savings commitment device. Work. Pap. 12-060, Harvard Bus. Sch., Boston, MA
  75. Kearney MS, Tufano P, Guryan J, Hurst E. 2010. Making savers winners: an overview of prize-linked savings products. NBER Work. Pap. 16433
  76. Keller PA, Harlam B, Loewenstein G, Volpp KG. 2011. Enhanced active choice: a new method to motivate behavior change. J. Consum. Psychol. 21:376–83 [Google Scholar]
  77. Kling JR, Mullainathan S, Shafir E, Vermeulen LC, Wrobel MV. 2012. Comparison friction: experimental evidence from Medicare drug plans. Q. J. Econ. 127:199–235 [Google Scholar]
  78. Kooreman P. 2000. The labeling effect of a child benefit system. Am. Econ. Rev. 90:571–83 [Google Scholar]
  79. Lacetera N, Macis M, Slonim R. 2014. Rewarding volunteers: a field experiment. Manag. Sci. In press. [Google Scholar]
  80. Laibson D. 1997. Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Q. J. Econ. 112:443–77 [Google Scholar]
  81. Larrick RP, Soll JB. 2008. The MPG illusion. Science 320:1593–94 [Google Scholar]
  82. Leventhal H, Singer R, Jones A. 1965. Effect of fear and specificity of recommendation upon attitudes and behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2:20–29 [Google Scholar]
  83. Levitt S, List JA, Neckermann SS, Sadoff S. 2012. The behavioralist goes to school: leveraging behavioral economics to improve educational performance. NBER Work. Pap. 18165
  84. Lusardi A, Keller PA, Keller A. 2009. New ways to make people save: a social marketing approach. Overcoming the Saving Slump: How to Increase the Effectiveness of Financial Education and Saving Programs Lusardi A. 209–36 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  85. Madrian BC. 2013. Matching contributions and savings outcomes: a behavioral economics perspective. Matching Contributions for Pensions: A Review of International Experience Hinz R, Holzman R, Tuesta D, Takayama N. 289–310 Washington, DC: World Bank [Google Scholar]
  86. Madrian BC, Shea DF. 2001. The power of suggestion: inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. Q. J. Econ. 116:1149–87 [Google Scholar]
  87. Milkman KL, Beshears J, Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC. 2011. Using implementation intentions prompts to enhance influenza vaccination rates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108:10415–20 [Google Scholar]
  88. Milkman KL, Beshears J, Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC. 2013. Planning prompts as a means of increasing preventive screening rates. Prev. Med. 56:92–93 [Google Scholar]
  89. Nichol KL, Margolis KL, Wuorenma J, Von Sternberg I. 1994. The efficacy and cost effectiveness of vaccination against influence among elderly persons living in the community. N. Engl. J. Med. 331:778–84 [Google Scholar]
  90. Nichols AL, Zeckhauser RJ. 1982. Targeting transfers through restrictions on recipients. Am. Econ. Rev. 72:372–77 [Google Scholar]
  91. Nickerson DW, Rogers T. 2010. Do you have a voting plan? Implementation intentions, voter turnout, and organic plan making. Psychol. Sci. 21:194–99 [Google Scholar]
  92. O’Donoghue T, Rabin M. 1999. Doing it now or later. Am. Econ. Rev. 89:103–24 [Google Scholar]
  93. Payne JW, Bettman JR. 1999. Measuring constructed preferences: towards a building code. J. Risk Uncertain. 19:243–70 [Google Scholar]
  94. Pew Charit. Trusts 2013. How borrowers choose and repay payday loans. Rep., Pew Charit. Trusts, Washington, DC
  95. President’s Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform 2005. Simple, fair and pro-growth: proposals to fix America’s tax system. Rep., Pres. Advis. Panel Fed. Tax Reform, Washington, DC. http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/tax-policy/Documents/Simple-Fair-and-Pro-Growth-Proposals-to-Fix-Americas-Tax-System-11-2005.pdf
  96. Rogers T, Frey E. 2014. Changing behavior beyond the here and now. Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making Gideon K, Wu G. New York: Wiley In press [Google Scholar]
  97. Rogers T, Milkman KL, John LK, Norton MI. 2013. Making the best-laid plans better: how plan making increases follow-through. Work. Pap., Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA
  98. Rutter DR, Steadman L, Quine L. 2006. An implementation intentions intervention to increase uptake of mammography. Ann. Behav. Med. 32:127–34 [Google Scholar]
  99. Saez E. 2009. Details matter: the impact of presentation and information on the take-up of financial incentives for retirement saving. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 1:1204–28 [Google Scholar]
  100. Seftor NS, Turner S. 2002. Back to school: federal student aid policy and adult college enrollment. J. Hum. Resour. 37:336–52 [Google Scholar]
  101. Sheeran P, Orbell S. 2000. Using implementation intentions to increase attendance for cervical cancer screening. Health Psychol. 19:283–89 [Google Scholar]
  102. Shu LL, Mazar N, Gino F, Ariely D, Bazerman MH. 2012. Signing at the beginning makes ethics salient and decreases dishonest self-reports in comparison to signing at the end. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109:15197–200 [Google Scholar]
  103. Soman D, Cheema A. 2011. Earmarking and partitioning: increasing saving by low income households. J. Mark. Res. 48:Suppl. 1S14–22 [Google Scholar]
  104. Spital A. 1995. Mandated choice: a plan to increase public commitment to organ donation. JAMA 273:504–6 [Google Scholar]
  105. Stango V, Zinman J. 2009. Exponential growth bias and household finance. J. Finance 64:2807–49 [Google Scholar]
  106. Strotz RH. 1955. Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Rev. Econ. Stud. 23:1955–56 [Google Scholar]
  107. Subramanian CR. 2013. ‘Nudge’ back in fashion at White House. Time Swampland Blog, Aug. 9. http://swampland.time.com/2013/08/09/nudge-back-in-fashion-at-white-house/
  108. Sunstein CR. 2013a. Simpler: The Future of Government. New York: Simon & Schuster [Google Scholar]
  109. Sunstein C. 2013b. With clean-energy default rules, it’s easy being green. Bloomberg Businessweek, Apr. 4. http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-04-04/with-clean-energy-default-rules-its-easy-being-green
  110. Szilagyi PG, Bordley C, Vann JC, Chelminski A, Kraus RM et al. 2000. Effect of patient reminder/recall interventions on immunization rates: a review. JAMA 284:1820–27 [Google Scholar]
  111. Thaler RH, Benartzi S. 2004. Save More Tomorrow: using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. J. Polit. Econ. 112:S164–87 [Google Scholar]
  112. Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  113. Toder E, Khitatrakun S. 2006. KiwiSaver evaluation literature review. Rep., Tax Policy Cent., Brookings Inst., Washington, DC. http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/informationreleases/kiwisaver/background/ks-eval-lit-review-dec06.pdf
  114. Toffler A. 1970. Future Shock New York: Random House [Google Scholar]
  115. Ubel P. 2013. Beyond comprehension: figuring out whether decision aids improve people’s decisions. The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy Shafir E. 351–60 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  116. UK Dep. Work Pensions 2012. Reinvigorating workplace pensions. Position Pap., UK Dep. Work Pensions, London
  117. Vanguard Group. 2013. How America saves 2013: a report on Vanguard 2012 defined contribution plan data Vanguard Valley Forge, PA: [Google Scholar]
  118. Volpp KG, John LK, Troxel AB, Norton L, Fassbender J, Loewenstein G. 2008a. Financial incentive-based approaches for weight loss: a randomized trial. JAMA 300:2631–37 [Google Scholar]
  119. Volpp KG, Loewenstein G, Troxel AB, Doshi J, Price M et al. 2008b. A test of financial incentives to improve warfarin adherence. BMC Health Serv. Res. 8:272 [Google Scholar]
  120. Wilde JA, McMillan JA, Serwint J, Butta J, O’Riordan MA, Steinhoff MC. 1999. Effectiveness of influenza vaccine in health care professionals. JAMA 281:908–13 [Google Scholar]
  121. Wisdom J, Downs JS, Loesenstein G. 2010. Promoting healthy choices: information vs. convenience. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 2:164–78 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-041033
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-041033
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error