1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Economics
  4. Volume 12, 2020
  5. Article

Annual Review of Economics

Volume 12, 2020

Social Identity, Group Behavior, and Teams

Abstract

The issue of one's identity has loomed large recently and has unfortunately been used more and more as a wedge to separate subgroups. It is important to understand the ramifications of identity, both to limit the negative consequences (such as so-called identity politics) and to be able to use one's sense of identity as a positive force in the world. What are effective approaches to allow positive identities and pride about one's social identity to be reinforced for the greater good? Recent work suggests that some forms of team competition can induce greater effort, which can be applied to areas such as microlending, charitable giving, and organization of the gig economy. And yet many fascinating questions remain; for example, what is the interaction of salience, social norms, and preferences on the effects of social identity in our society?

Keyword(s): experiment, group behavior, norms, social identity, teams
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-091619-032800
2020-08-02
2025-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/economics/12/1/annurev-economics-091619-032800.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-091619-032800&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Afridi F, Li SX, Ren Y 2015. Social identity and inequality: the impact of China's hukou system. J. Public Econ. 123:17–29
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ai W, Chen R, Chen Y, Mei Q, Phillips W 2016. Recommending teams promotes prosocial lending in online microfinance. PNAS 113:5214944–48
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Ai W, Chen Y, Mei Q, Ye J, Zhang L 2019. Putting teams into the gig economy: a natural field experiment at a ride-sharing platform Work. Pap., Univ. Mich Ann Arbor:
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Akerlof GA. 2007. The missing motivation in macroeconomics. Am. Econ. Rev. 97:15–36
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Akerlof GA, Kranton RE. 2000. Economics and identity. Q. J. Econ. 115:3715–53
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Akerlof GA, Kranton RE. 2002. Identity and schooling: some lessons for the economics of education. J. Econ. Lit. 40:41167–201
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Akerlof GA, Kranton RE. 2005. Identity and the economics of organizations. J. Econ. Perspect. 19:19–32
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Akerlof R. 2016. “We thinking” and its consequences. Am. Econ. Rev 106:5415–19
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Akerlof R. 2017. Value formation: the role of esteem. Games Econ. Behav. 102:1–19
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Aronson J, Quinn DM, Spencer S 1998. Stereotype threat and the academic underperformance of minorities and women. Prejudice: The Target's Perspective JK Swim, C Stangor 83–103 San Diego, CA: Academic
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bargh JA, Chartrand TL. 1999. The unbearable automaticity of being. Am. Psychol. 54:462–79
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Bargh JA, Chen M, Burrows L 1996. Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 71:2230–44
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Bargh JA, Pietromonaco P. 1982. Automatic information processing and social perception: the influence of trait information presented outside of conscious awareness on impression formation. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 22:293–311
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Basu K. 2010. The moral basis of prosperity and oppression: altruism, other-regarding behaviour and identity. Econ. Philos. 26:189–216
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Bénabou R, Tirole J. 2011. Identity, morals, and taboos: beliefs as assets. Q. J. Econ. 126:2805–55
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Benbow CP. 1995. Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability in intellectually talented preadolescents: their nature, effects, and possible causes. Behav. Brain Sci. 11:169–232
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Benjamin DJ, Choi JJ, Strickland AJ 2010. Social identity and preferences. Am. Econ. Rev. 100:41913–28
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Bernard M, Hett F, Mechtel M 2016. Social identity and social free-riding. Eur. Econ. Rev. 90:4–17
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Bernhard H, Fehr E, Fischbacher U 2006. Group affiliation and altruistic norm enforcement. Am. Econ. Rev. 96:2217–21
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Bornstein G, Gneezy U, Nagel R 2002. The effect of intergroup competition on group coordination: an experimental study. Games Econ. Behav. 41:11–25
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Brewer MB. 1999. The psychology of prejudice: ingroup love and outgroup hate. J. Soc. Issues 55:3429–44
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Buller P. 1986. The team building-task performance relation: some conceptual and methodological refinements. Group Organ. Manag. 11:3147–68
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Carvalho J-P. 2013. Veiling. Q. J. Econ. 128:1337–70
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Cason TN, Lau S-HP, Mui V-L 2019. Prior interaction, identity, and cooperation in the Inter-Group Prisoner's Dilemma. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 166:613–29
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Chang D, Chen R, Krupka E 2019. Rhetoric matters: a social norms explanation for the anomaly of framing. Games Econ. Behav. 116:158–78
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Charness G, Cobo-Reyes R, Jiménez N 2014. Identities, selection, and contributions in a public-goods game. Games Econ. Behav. 87:322–38
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Charness G, Dufwenberg M. 2006. Promises and partnership. Econometrica 74:61579–601
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Charness G, Holder P. 2019. Charity in the laboratory: matching, competition, and group membership. Manag. Sci. 65:31398–407
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Charness G, Naef M, Sontuoso A 2019. Opportunistic conformism. J. Econ. Theory 180:100–34
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Charness G, Rabin M. 2002. Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Q. J. Econ. 117:817–69
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Charness G, Rigotti L, Rustichini A 2007. Individual behavior and group membership. Am. Econ. Rev. 97:1340–52
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Charness G, Rustichini A. 2011. Gender differences in cooperation with group membership. Games Econ. Behav. 72:77–85
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Charness G, Sutter M. 2012. Groups make better self-interested decisions. J. Econ. Perspect. 26:3157–76
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Chen R, Chen Y. 2011. The potential of social identity for equilibrium selection. Am. Econ. Rev. 101:62562–89
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Chen R, Chen Y, Liu Y, Mei Q 2017. Does team competition increase pro-social lending? Evidence from online microfinance. Games Econ. Behav. 101:311–33
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Chen Y, Li SX. 2009. Group identity and social preference. Am. Econ. Rev. 99:1431–57
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Chen Y, Li SX, Liu TX, Shih M 2014. Which hat to wear? Impact of natural identities on coordination and cooperation. Games Econ. Behav. 84:58–86
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Cohn A, Fehr E, Maréchal M 2017. Do professional norms in the banking industry favor risk-taking. Rev. Financ. Stud. 30:113801–23
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Cohn A, Maréchal M, Noll T 2015. Bad boys: how criminal identity salience affects rule violation. Rev. Econ. Stud. 82:41289–308
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Coleman J. 1961. The Adolescent Society: The Social Life of the Teenager and Its Impact on Education New York: Free Press
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Croizet J-C, Claire T. 1998. Extending the concept of stereotype threat to social class: the intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 24:588–94
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Currarini S, Matheson J, Vega-Redondo F 2016. A simple model of homophily in social networks. Eur. Econ. Rev. 90:18–39
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Currarini S, Mengel F. 2016. Identity, homophily, and in-group bias. Eur. Econ. Rev. 90:40–55
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Dugar S, Shahriar Q. 2012. Group identity and the moral hazard problem: experimental evidence. J. Econ. Manag. Strategy 21:41061–81
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Eckel CC, Grossman PJ. 2005. Managing diversity by creating team identity. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 58:3371–92
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Erev I, Bornstein G, Galili R 1993. Constructive intergroup competition as a solution to the free rider problem in the workplace. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 29:6463–78
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Darity WA, Mason PL, Stewart JB 2006. The economics of identity: the origin and persistence of racial identity norms. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 60:3283–305
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Fang H, Loury GC. 2005. “Dysfunctional identities” can be rational. Am. Econ. Rev. 95:2104–11
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Feri F, Irlenbusch B, Sutter M 2010. Efficiency gains from team-based coordination—large-scale experimental evidence. Am. Econ. Rev. 100:41892–912
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Fryer R, Jackson MO. 2008. A categorical model of cognition and biased decision making. B.E. J. Theor. Econ. 8:1 https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1704.1357
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  51. Goette L, Huffman D, Meier S 2006. The impact of group membership on cooperation and norm enforcement: evidence using random assignment to real social groups. Am. Econ. Rev. 96:2212–16
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Goette L, Huffman D, Meier S 2012. The impact of social ties on group interactions: evidence from minimal groups and randomly assigned real groups. Am. Econ. J. Microecon. 4:1101–15
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Hargreaves Heap SP, Zizzo DJ 2009. The value of groups. Am. Econ. Rev. 99:1295–323
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Hedges LV, Nowell A. 1995. Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science 269:41–45
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Herrmann B, Thöni C, Gächter S 2008. Antisocial punishment across societies. Science 319:58681362–67
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Hetey RC, Eberhardt JL. 2014. Racial disparities in incarceration increase acceptance of punitive policies. Psychol. Sci. 25:101949–54
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Hetey RC, Eberhardt JL. 2018. The numbers don't speak for themselves: racial disparities and the persistence of inequality in the criminal justice system. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 27:3183–87
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Hett F, Kröll M, Mechtel M 2020. The structure and behavioral effects of revealed social identity preferences. Econ. J. In press
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Hoff K, Pandey P. 2006. Discrimination, social identity, and durable inequalities. Am. Econ. Rev. 96:206–11
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Hoff K, Pandey P. 2014. Making up people: the effect of identity on preferences and performance in a modernizing society. J. Dev. Econ. 106:118–31
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Hogg MA. 2000. Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: a motivational theory of social identity processes. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 11:1223–55
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Jiang J, Li SX. 2019. Group identity and partnership. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 160:202–13
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Kranton R, Pease M, Sanders S, Huettel S 2016. Groupy and not groupy behavior: deconstructing bias in social preferences Work. Pap., Duke Univ Durham, NC:
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Krupka EL, Weber RA. 2013. Identifying social norms using coordination games: Why does dictator game sharing vary. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 11:3495–524
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Kugler T, Bornstein G, Kocher MG, Sutter M 2007. Trust between individuals and groups: Groups are less trusting than individuals but just as trustworthy. J. Econ. Psychol. 28:6646–57
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Lane T. 2016. Discrimination in the laboratory: a meta-analysis of economics experiments. Eur. Econ. Rev. 90:375–402
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Li SX. 2020. Group identity, ingroup favoritism, and discrimination. Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics K Zimmermann Cham, Switz: Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_123-1
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  68. Li SX, de Oliveira ACM, Eckel C 2017. Common identity and the voluntary provision of public goods: an experimental investigation. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 142:32–46
     [Google Scholar]
  69. McLeish KN, Oxoby RJ. 2007. Identity, cooperation, and punishment Discuss. Pap. 2572, Inst. Labor Econ. (IZA) Bonn, Ger.:
     [Google Scholar]
  70. McLeish KN, Oxoby RJ. 2011. Social interactions and the salience of social identity. J. Econ. Psychol. 32:1172–78
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Milgram S. 1963. Behavioral study of obedience. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 67:4371–78
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Milgram S. 1974. Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View New York: HarperCollins
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Monderer D, Shapley L. 1996. Potential games. Games Econ. Behav. 14:124–43
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Mullen B, Brown R, Smith C 1992. Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: an integration. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 22:2103–22
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Peffley M, Hurwitz J. 2007. Persuasion and resistance: race and the death penalty in America. Am. J. Political Sci. 51:996–1012
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Rong R, Houser D, Dai AY 2016. Money or friends: social identity and deception in networks. Eur. Econ. Rev. 90:55–66
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Sen A. 2007. Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny New Delhi: Penguin Books India
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Shayo M. 2009. A model of social identity with an application to political economy: nation, class, and redistribution. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 103:2147–74
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Shayo M. 2020. Social identity and economic policy. Annu. Rev. Econ. 12:355–89
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Shih M, Pittinsky TL, Ambady N 1999. Stereotype susceptibility: identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychol. Sci. 10:180–83
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Shih M, Pittinsky TL, Trahan A 2006. Domain-specific effects of stereotypes on performance. Self Identity 5:11–14
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Song F. 2008. Trust and reciprocity behavior and behavioral forecasts: individuals versus group-representatives. Games Econ. Behav. 62:2675–96
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Spencer S, Steele CM, Quinn DM 1999. Stereotype threat and women's math performance. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 35:4–28
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Steele CM, Aronson J. 1995. Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African-Americans. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 69:797–811
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Steen LA. 1987. Mathematics education: a predictor of scientific competitiveness. Science 237:251–53
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Tajfel H, Billig MG, Bundy RP, Flament CL 1971. Social categorization and inter-group behavior. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 1:149–77
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Tajfel H, Turner J. 1979. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations S Worchel, W Austin 94–109 Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Tajfel H, Turner J. 1986. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations S Worchel, W Austin Chicago: Nelson-Hall
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Tanaka T, Camerer CF, Nguyen Q 2016. Trait perceptions influence economic out-group bias: lab and field evidence from Vietnam. Exp. Econ. 19:3513–34
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Turner JC. 1978. Social categorization and social discrimination in the minimal group paradigm. Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations H Tajfel 101–40 New York: Academic
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Van Huyck JB, Battalio RC, Beil RO 1990. Tacit coordination games, strategic uncertainty, and coordination failure. Am. Econ. Rev. 80:1234–48
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Weber RA. 2006. Managing growth to achieve efficient coordination in large groups. Am. Econ. Rev. 96:1114–26
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Yamagishi T, Kiyonari T. 2000. The group as the container of generalized reciprocity. Soc. Psychol. Q. 63:2116–32
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-091619-032800
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error