1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Environment and Resources
  4. Volume 49, 2024
  5. Article

Annual Review of Environment and Resources

Volume 49, 2024

Artistic Practices in the Anthropocene

Abstract

This article reviews Western perspectives—in a fruitful dialogue with non-Western perspectives—on the climate emergency and artistic experiences amid the ongoing debate about futures currently at stake in the climate crisis or climate emergency. Moving beyond the various ways of naming this crisis, we focus on how art can communicate, envision, and activate ways of inhabiting this problem, opening communities to an other-than-human coexistence and reconfiguring matters as we understand them in a geological, natural, or material sense. The analyses indicate that, instead of aiming at a singular solution, multiple exercises and imaginative and speculative avenues of narratives can tell different stories and envision alternative futures. If the climate crisis ignited in the Anthropocene is a shared crisis—both political and aesthetic—then art, inseparable from life and hence nature, holds a crucial role in nurturing care and the potency of imagining other possible worlds.

Keyword(s): Anthropocene, art, climate change
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-112922-112400
2024-10-18
2025-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/energy/49/1/annurev-environ-112922-112400.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-112922-112400&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Latour B, Schultz N. 2022.. Memorando Sobre a Nova Classe Ecológica: Como Fazer Emergir uma Classe Ecológica, Consciente e Segura de Si. Petrópolis, Braz.:: Vozes
     [Google Scholar]
  2. 2.
    Haraway D. 2016.. Antropoceno, Capitaloceno, Plantationoceno, Chthuluceno: fazendo parentes. , transl. S Dias, M Verônica, A Godoy . ClimaCom Vulnerabilidade 3:5. http://climacom.mudancasclimaticas.net.br/antropoceno-capitaloceno-plantationoceno-chthuluceno-fazendo-parentes/
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 3.
    Haraway D. 2016.. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC:: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  4. 4.
    Latour B. 2017.. Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. Hoboken, NJ:: Wiley
     [Google Scholar]
  5. 5.
    Davis H, Turpin E. 2015.. Art in the Anthropocene: Encounters Among Aesthetics, Politics, Environments and Epistemologies. London:: Open Humanities Press
     [Google Scholar]
  6. 6.
    Stengers I. 2015.. No Tempo das Catástrofes. São Paulo:: Cosac Naif
     [Google Scholar]
  7. 7.
    Tsing AL. 2019.. Viver nas Ruínas: Paisagens Multiespécies no Antropoceno. Brasília:: Mil Folhas IEB
     [Google Scholar]
  8. 8.
    Morton T. 2013.. Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology After the End of the World. Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press:
     [Google Scholar]
  9. 9.
    Funtowicz S, Ravetz J. 1997.. Ciência pós-normal e comunidade ampliadas de pares face aos desafios ambientais. . Hist. Ciênc. Saúde Manguinhos 4:(2):219–30. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-59701997000200002
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  10. 10.
    Moore J ( org. ). 2022.. Antropoceno ou Capitaloceno? Natureza, História e a Crise do Capitalismo. São Paulo:: Elefante
     [Google Scholar]
  11. 11.
    Stengers I. 2017.. Reativar o Animismo. Belo Horizonte, Braz:.: Chão Feira
     [Google Scholar]
  12. 12.
    Zylinska J. 2014.. Minimal Ethics for the Anthropocene. London:: Open Humanities Press
     [Google Scholar]
  13. 13.
    Klein N. 2017.. Prepare-se para o capitalismo do desastre de Trump. . The Intercept, Jan. 26th. https://theintercept.com/2017/01/26/prepare-se-para-o-capitalismo-do-desastre-de-trump /
     [Google Scholar]
  14. 14.
    Bellacasa M. 2012.. Nothing comes without its world: thinking with care. . Sociol. Rev. 60:(2):197–206
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  15. 15.
    Guzzo MSL, Taddei R. 2019.. Experiência estética e antropoceno: políticas do comum para os fins de mundo. . Desigual. Divers. 17::72–88. https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/46021/46021.PDF
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 16.
    Rancière J. 2005.. A Partilha do Sensível: Estética e Política. São Paulo:: EXO/34
     [Google Scholar]
  17. 17.
    Bona DT. 2020.. Cosmopoéticas do Refúgio. Florianópolis, Braz:.: Cultura Barbárie
     [Google Scholar]
  18. 18.
    Manning E. 2016.. The Minor Gesture. Durham, NC:: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  19. 19.
    Ribeiro W, Fari NS, Baio C, Campos RC. 2021.. From embodiment to emplacement: artistic research in insular territories of the Guanabara Bay. . Glob. Perform. Stud. 4:(2). https://gps.psi-web.org/article/view/93/93/
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 20.
    Wallen R. 2012.. Ecological art: a call for visionary intervention in a time of crisis. . Leonardo 45:(3):234–42. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41550639
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  21. 21.
    Guzzo MSL. 2022.. Práticas artísticas diante do Antropoceno: uma experiência de refúgio. . Liinc Rev. 18:(1):e5908. https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v18i1.5908
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  22. 22.
    Taddei R. 2017.. Alter geoengenharia. . In Meteorologistas e Profetas da Chuva: Conhecimentos, Práticas e Políticas da Atmosfera, ed. ML Paris , pp. 189–205. São Paulo:: Terceiro Nome
     [Google Scholar]
  23. 23.
    Danowski D, Viveiros de Castro E. 2014.. Há Mundo por Vir? Ensaio Sobre os Medos e os Fins. Florianópolis, Braz:.: Cultura Barbárie
     [Google Scholar]
  24. 24.
    Taddei R, Shiratori K, Bulamah R. 2022.. Decolonizing the Anthropocene. . In The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology, ed. H Callan, S Coleman . London:: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea2519
     [Google Scholar]
  25. 25.
    Moore JW, ed. 2016.. Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. Binghamton, NY:: PM Press
     [Google Scholar]
  26. 26.
    Pyne S. 2022.. The Pyrocene: How We Created an Age of Fire, and What Happens. Oakland:: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  27. 27.
    Ferdinand M. 2022.. Decolonial Ecology: Thinking from the Caribbean World. Cambridge, UK:: Polity Press
     [Google Scholar]
  28. 28.
    Povinelli E. 2021.. Between Gaia and Ground: Four Axioms of Existence and the Ancestral Catastrophe of Late Liberalism. Durham, NC:: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 29.
    Mbembe A. 2021.. Brutalismo. São Paulo:: N-1
     [Google Scholar]
  30. 30.
    Moulin G, Marquez R, Andrés R, Cançado W. 2022.. Habitar o Antropoceno. Belo Horizonte, Braz.:: BDMG Cultural
     [Google Scholar]
  31. 31.
    Costa A. 2022.. O antropoceno é nosso tempo. . See Ref. 30 , pp. 43–67
     [Google Scholar]
  32. 32.
    Duperrex M. 2018.. Habiter le crassier. Un art anthropocène comme chronique de la catastrophe. . Transtext(e)s Transcult. 跨文本跨文化 13:. https://doi.org/10.4000/transtexts.1075
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 33.
    Riechmann J. 2019.. Otro fin del mundo es posible, decían los compañeros. Barcelona:: MRA Ed.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. 34.
    Krenak A. 2019.. Ideias para Adiar o Fim do Mundo. Rio de Janeiro: Cia. Let:.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. 35.
    Miles M. 2010.. Representing nature: art and climate change. . Cult. Geogr. 17:(1):19–35. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44251311
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  36. 36.
    Knebusch J. 2008.. Art and climate (change) perception: outline of a phenomenology of climate. . In Sustainability: A New Frontier for the Arts and Cultures, ed. S Kagan, V Kirchberg , pp. 242–61. Frankfurt:: Akad. Schr.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. 37.
    Cauquelin A. 2007.. A Invenção da Paisagem. São Paulo:: Martins Fontes
     [Google Scholar]
  38. 38.
    Yusoff K, Gabrys J. 2011.. Climate change and the imagination. . WIREs Clim. Change 2:(4):516–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.117
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  39. 39.
    Johas R. 2018.. Arte na era do Antropoceno. . Arteriais 4:(6):142–49. https://doi.org/10.18542/arteriais.v4i6.5968
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 40.
    Roosen LJ, Klöckner CA, Swim JK. 2018.. Visual art as a way to communicate climate change: a psychological perspective on climate change–related art. . World Art 8:(1):85–110. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21500894.2017.1375002?scroll=top&needAccess=true
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  41. 41.
    Hahn U, Vermeylen F. 2023.. Mirror or hammer? News media coverage of climate-related art. . Environ. Commun. 17:(2):172–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2023.2167848
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  42. 42.
    Szerszynski B, Heim W, Waterton C. 2003.. Nature Performed: Environment, Culture and Performance. Oxford, UK:: Blackwell Publ.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. 43.
    Giannachi G. 2012.. Representing, performing and mitigating climate change in contemporary art practice. . Leonardo 45:(2):124–32. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_00278
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  44. 44.
    Demos T. 2016.. Decolonizing Nature: Contemporary Art and the Politics of Ecology. London:: Sternberg Press
     [Google Scholar]
  45. 45.
    Galafassi D, Kagan S, Milkoreit S, Heras M, Bilodeau C, et al. 2018.. “ Raising the temperature”: the arts on a warming planet. . Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 31::71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.12.010
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  46. 46.
    Drabble B. 2016.. Tipping points: environmentally engaged art at the COP21 Conference on Climate Change. . Seismopolite, June 1. http://www.seismopolite.com/contemporary-art-at-the-tipping-point-environmentally-engaged-art-at-and-after-cop21-conference-on-climate-change
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 47.
    Eliasson O, Rosing M. 2015.. Ice watch. Exhib. , Place du Panthéon, Paris:
     [Google Scholar]
  48. 48.
    Cité Sci. Ind., MVRDV. 2004.. Climax. Exhib. , MVRDV, Paris:
     [Google Scholar]
  49. 49.
    Davies S. 2006.. The ship: the art of climate change. Exhib. , Natural History Museum, London:
     [Google Scholar]
  50. 50.
    Lippard LR, Smith S, Revkin AC. 2007.. Weather report: art and climate change. Exhib. , Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art, Boulder, Colo:. http://www.kahrl.com/xml/pdf/sep_2007.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  51. 51.
    Center for Art and Media Karlsruhe . 2020.. Critical zones. Exhib. , Center for Art and Media Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe:. https://zkm.de/en/exhibition/2020/05/critical-zones
    [Google Scholar]
  52. 52.
    Serpentine. 2022.. Back to Earth. Exhib. , Serpentine North Gallery, London:. https://www.serpentinegalleries.org/whats-on/back-to-earth-exhibition/
    [Google Scholar]
  53. 53.
    Büyüktaşciyan H. 2022.. A clearing in the forest. Exhib. , Tate Modern, London:. https://www.tate.org.uk/visit/tate-modern/display/a-clearing-in-the-forest
    [Google Scholar]
  54. 54.
    Dyer S, Engelmann S. 2021.. When I image the Earth, I imagine another. Exhib. , Photographers’ Gallery, London:. https://thephotographersgallery.org.uk/whats-on/when-i-image-earth-i-imagine-another
    [Google Scholar]
  55. 55.
    Eshum E. 2021–2022.. We are history: race, colonialism & climate change. Exhib. , Somerset House, London:. https://www.somersethouse.org.uk/whats-on/we-are-history
    [Google Scholar]
  56. 56.
    R. Acad. 2019–2020.. Eco-visionaries: confronting a planet in a state of emergency. Exhib. , Burlington Gardens, London:
     [Google Scholar]
  57. 57.
    Till C, Franklin K. 2022.. Our time on Earth. Exhib. , Barbican Art Gallery, London:. https://www.barbican.org.uk/whats-on/2022/event/our-time-on-earth
    [Google Scholar]
  58. 58.
    Cruz J, Tana J. 2023.. Adaptation: a reconnected Earth. Exhib. , Museum of Contemporary Art and Design, Manila:. https://www.mcadmanila.org.ph/adaptation-a-reconnected-earth/
    [Google Scholar]
  59. 59.
    Germann M, Reiko T. 2023.. Our ecology: toward a planetary living. Exhib. , Mori Art Museum, Tokyo:. https://www.mori.art.museum/en/exhibitions/eco/index.html
    [Google Scholar]
  60. 60.
    Nurmis J. 2016.. Visual climate change art 2005–2015: discourse and practice. . WIREs Clim. Change 7:(4):501–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.400
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  61. 61.
    Anderson K. 2015.. Ethics, ecology, and the future: Art and design face the Anthropocene. . ACM SIGGRAPH Art Pap. 15::338–47. https://doi.org/10.1145/2810177.2810180
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  62. 62.
    O'Neill SJ, Smith N. 2014.. Climate change and visual imagery. . WIREs Clim. Change 5:(1):73–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.249
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  63. 63.
    Azevedo N. 2005.. Monumento mínimo. https://www.neleazevedo.com.br/monumento-minimo
    [Google Scholar]
  64. 64.
    Radin J, Kowai E, eds. 2017.. Cyopolitics: Frozen Life in a Melting Method. Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10456.001.0001
    [Google Scholar]
  65. 65.
    Branco P, Fagundes GM. 2020.. Why do art and anthropology matter when the world seems to be going down in flames?. In Cerrado EcoArte, Vol. 1, org. TP Khouri , pp. 69–81. Brasília:: Cena Criativa
     [Google Scholar]
  66. 66.
    Walsh L. 2015.. The visual rhetoric of climate change. . WIREs Clim. Change 6:(4):361–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.342
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  67. 67.
    Ritts M, Bakker K. 2019.. New forms: Anthropocene festivals and experimental environmental governance. . Environ. Plann. E Nat. Space 5:(1):125–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848619886974
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  68. 68.
    Borrelli N, Santo RD, Davis P, eds. 2022.. Ecomuseums and Climate Change. Milano:: LediPublishing
     [Google Scholar]
  69. 69.
    Corral ON, Fernández JF. 2022.. The importance of ecomuseums and local knowledge for a sustainable future: the La Ponte–Ecomuseu project. . In Ecomuseums and Climate Change, ed. N Borrelli, P Davis, R Dal Santo , pp. 283–302. Milano:: LediPublishing
     [Google Scholar]
  70. 70.
    Ramalho CMB, Rosa TF, Costa LSF. 2022.. A educação museal e os desafios no antropoceno. . Liinc Rev. 18:(1):e5837. https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v18i1.5837
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  71. 71.
    Dietachmair P, Gielen P, Nicolau G. 2023.. Sensing Earth: Cultural Quests Across a Heated Globe. Amsterdam:: Valiz
     [Google Scholar]
  72. 72.
    Krenak A, Cesarino PN. 2016.. As alianças afetivas. . In Incerteza Viva: Dias de Estudo, ed. A Krenak , pp. 169–84. São Paulo:: Fundação Bienal de São Paulo
     [Google Scholar]
  73. 73.
    Guzzo MSL. 2023.. Coreografar a crise: uma dramaturgia do contexto presente. . Urdimento Rev. Estud. Artes Cênicas 3:(48). https://doi.org/10.5965/1414573103482023e0103
     [Google Scholar]
  74. 74.
    Andujar C. 2020.. Claudia Adujar—the Yanomami struggle. Exhib. , Fondation Cartier pour l'art contemporain, Paris:
     [Google Scholar]
  75. 75.
    Mauad AM. 2014.. Imagens possíveis fotografia e memória em Claudia Andujar. . Rev. Eco Pós 15:(1):124–46
     [Google Scholar]
  76. 76.
    Duarte R. 2019.. Olhares do infinito: notas sobre a obra de Claudia Andujar. . Studium (12):40–61. https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/studium/article/view/11747
    [Google Scholar]
  77. 77.
    Moraes RCP. 2014.. Rupturas na fotografia documental brasileira: Claudia Andujar e a poética do (in)visível. . Discursos Fotogr. 10:(16):53–84. https://doi.org/10.5433/1984-7939.2014v10n16p53
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  78. 78.
    Pignarre P, Stengers I. 2011.. Capitalist Sorcery: Breaking the Spell, transl. A Goffey . New York:: Palgrave Macmillan
     [Google Scholar]
  79. 79.
    Dias S. 2022.. Modos de atención a la Tierra: materiales y prácticas artísticas frente al Antropoceno. . FILHA 17:(27):49–69. https://revistas.uaz.edu.mx/index.php/filha/article/view/2012
    [Google Scholar]
  80. 80.
    Bambozzi L. 2023.. Solastalgia. Exhib. , MAC USP, São Paulo:. http://www.mac.usp.br/mac/expos/2023/solastalgia/index.html
    [Google Scholar]
  81. 81.
    Monaches J. 2022.. Políticas interespécies. . Celeste/Select, Oct. 4. https://select.art.br/politicas-interespecies/
    [Google Scholar]
  82. 82.
    Brenner F. 2022.. The interspecies mindset guiding Brazilian protestors. . Frieze, Mar. 16. https://www.frieze.com/article/intespecies-mindset-brazilian-protestors
    [Google Scholar]
  83. 83.
    Fowkes M, Fowkes R. 2022.. Art and Climate Change (World of Art). London:: Thames & Hudson
     [Google Scholar]
  84. 84.
    Federici S. 2022.. Reencantando o Mundo: Feminismo e a Política dos Comuns. São Paulo:: Elefante
     [Google Scholar]
  85. 85.
    Acosta A. 2016.. O Bem Viver: Uma Oportunidade para Imaginar Outros Mundos. São Paulo:: Autonomia Literária
     [Google Scholar]
  86. 86.
    Ticoulat F. 2022.. Prefácio. . In Eco Lógicas Latinas, ed. F Ticoulat, JPS Lopes , pp. 8–15. São Paulo:: Act
     [Google Scholar]
  87. 87.
    Tsing AL, Deger J, Saxena AK, Zhou F, eds. 2021.. Feral Atlas: The More-Than-Human Anthropocene. Stanford, CA:: Stanford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  88. 88.
    Fetzner D, Dornberg M. 2018.. DE/GLOBALIZE: an artistic research about how to deglobalize the global. http://www.metaspace.de/Main/Deglobalize
    [Google Scholar]
  89. 89.
    de Andrade J. 2017.. O peixe (fragmento)/the fish (excerpt). . Vimeo. https://vimeo.com/213283861
    [Google Scholar]
  90. 90.
    Maia R. 2016.. Where everyone sees. Performance. https://lindomberto-ferreira-alves.webnode.page/pesquisas/
    [Google Scholar]
  91. 91.
    Mbembe A. 2018.. Crítica da Razão Negra. São Paulo:: N-1
     [Google Scholar]
  92. 92.
    Mbembe A. 2018.. Necropolítica. São Paulo:: N-1
     [Google Scholar]
  93. 93.
    Kirksey E. 2015.. Emergent Ecologies. Durham, NC:: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  94. 94.
    Rocheleau D, Ross L, Morrobel J, Malaret L, Hernandez R, Kominiak T. 2001.. Complex communities and emergent ecologies in the regional agroforest of Zambrana-Chacuey, Dominican Republic. . Ecumene 8:(4):466–92. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/096746080100800405
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  95. 95.
    Ojeda D, Nirmal P, Rocheleau D, Emel J. 2022.. Feminist ecologies. . Annu. Rev. Environ. Resourc. 47::149–71. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-092246
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  96. 96.
    Azevedo LF. 2021.. Prefácio. . In Não Vão Nos Matar Agora, ed. J Mombaça , pp. 7–11. Rio de Janeiro:: Cobogó
     [Google Scholar]
  97. 97.
    Pereira FLB. 2021.. Desenvolvimentismo e ecocídio: causa e (possível) consequência no contexto de ruptura das bases existenciais dos povos originários no Brasil. . Bol. Cient. Esc. Super. Minist. Público União 51::257–81. https://escola.mpu.mp.br/publicacoescientificas/index.php/boletim/article/view/527
    [Google Scholar]
  98. 98.
    Yusoff K. 2018.. A Billion Black Anthropocenes or None. Minneapolis, MN:: Univ. Minn. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  99. 99.
    Ferreira da Silva D. 2019.. A Dívida Impagável. São Paulo:: Oficina de Imaginação Política e Living Commons
     [Google Scholar]
  100. 100.
    Scott T. 2019.. Biography: Ana Mendieta. . The Heroine Collective. https://www.moma.org/artists/3924
    [Google Scholar]
  101. 101.
    Ker J. 2017.. O grito da Amazônia em Uýra Sodoma. . Hibrida. https://revistahibrida.com.br/drag-quem/o-grito-da-amazonia-de-uyra-sodoma/
    [Google Scholar]
  102. 102.
    Mombaça J. 2016.. Soterramento (Burial). . Vimeo. https://vimeo.com/153102178
    [Google Scholar]
  103. 103.
    Mombaça J. 2020.. A plantação cognitiva. . MASP Afterall 9:. https://assets.masp.org.br/uploads/temp/temp-QYyC0FPJZWoJ7Xs8Dgp6.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  104. 104.
    Sandilands C. 2016.. Queer ecology. . In Keywords for Environmental Studies, ed. J Adamson, W Gleason, D Pellow , pp. 169–71. New York:: NYU Press
     [Google Scholar]
  105. 105.
    Cuntemporary. 2019.. EcoFutures Festival. Festival, Apr. 4–19 , The Art Pavillion, London:. https://cuntemporary.org/ecofutures-festival/
    [Google Scholar]
  106. 106.
    Preciado P. 2014.. Descolonizar el museo. Colloq., Museum of Contemporary Art, Barcelona:. https://www.macba.cat/es/exposiciones-actividades/actividades/descolonizar-museo
    [Google Scholar]
  107. 107.
    PIPA Prize. 2022.. Davi de Jesus do Nascimento. PIPA Prize. . https://www.pipaprize.com/davi-de-jesus-do-nascimento/
  108. 108.
    Dias S, Guzzo F, Fonseca F. 2022.. Políticas vegetais. http://climacom.mudancasclimaticas.net.br/apresentacao-editorial-politicas-vegetais-ano-9-n-23-2022/
    [Google Scholar]
  109. 109.
    Coccia E. 2018.. A Vida das Plantas: Uma Metafísica da Mistura. Florianópolis, Braz.:: Cultura e Barbárie
     [Google Scholar]
  110. 110.
    Dias S. 2020.. Perceber-fazer floresta: da aventura de entrar em comunicação com um mundo todo vivo. . ClimaCom 7:(17), June 23. http://climacom.mudancasclimaticas.net.br/susana-dias-florestas
    [Google Scholar]
  111. 111.
    Mancuso S. 2019.. Revolução das Plantas: Um Novo Modelo para o Futuro. São Paulo:: Ubu
     [Google Scholar]
  112. 112.
    Ingold T. 2013.. Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. London:: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  113. 113.
    Tsing AL. 2021.. O antropoceno mais que humano. . ILHA Rev. Antropol. 23:(1):176–91. https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ilha/article/view/75732
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  114. 114.
    Myers N. 2017.. Ungrid-able ecologies: decolonizing the ecological sensorium in a 10,000 year-old naturalcultural happening. . Catalyst Fem. Theory Technosci. 3:(2). https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v3i2.28848
     [Google Scholar]
  115. 115.
    Albert B, Chandès H, Gaudefroy I ( curators ). 2019–2020.. Trees. Exhib. , Fondation Cartier pour l'art contemporain, Paris:. https://www.fondationcartier.com/en/exhibitions/nous-les-arbres
    [Google Scholar]
  116. 116.
    Menna Barreto J. 2016.. Restauro. Presented at Bienal de São Paulo, 32nd. https://jorggemennabarreto.com/trabalhos/restauro/
    [Google Scholar]
  117. 117.
    Vicuña C. 2022–2023.. Quipu of Encounters: Rituals and Assemblies. Exhib. , Tate Modern, London:. https://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tate-modern/cecilia-vicu%C3%B1a/quipu-of-encounters
     [Google Scholar]
  118. 118.
    Burke M, Ockwell D, Whitmarsh L. 2018.. Participatory arts and affective engagement with climate change: the missing link in achieving climate compatible behavior change?. Glob. Environ. Change 49::95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.007
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  119. 119.
    Cubillos Barragán GN. 2020.. El arte como espacio de acción para espect-actores y espect-actrices en la escenografía de los conflictos socioambientales ligados al Cambio Climático. Experiencia con niños, niñas y jóvenes de la Agrupación Cultural Atizay ubicada en la localidad de Bosa, Bogotá 2018–2019. Master's Thesis , FLACSO Ecuador:, Quito, Ecuador
     [Google Scholar]
  120. 120.
    Bentz J, O'Brien K. 2019.. Art for change: transformative learning and youth empowerment in a changing climate. . Elementa Sci. Anthropocene 7::52. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.390
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  121. 121.
    Jacobson SK, McDuff MD, Monroe MC, Hagyó A, Shwom R, Zhong L. 2016.. Integrated science and art education for creative climate change communication. . Ecol. Soc. 21:(3):30. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26269971
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  122. 122.
    Bentz J. 2020.. Learning about climate change in, with and through art. . Clim. Change 162::1595–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02804-4
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  123. 123.
    Leavy P. 2015.. Method Meets Art: Arts-Based Research Practice. New York:: Guilford
     [Google Scholar]
  124. 124.
    Gabrys J, Yusoff K. 2012.. Arts, sciences and climate change: practices and politics at the threshold. . Sci. Cult. 21:(1):1–24. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09505431.2010.550139
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  125. 125.
    Ostrom E. 1990.. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  126. 126.
    Bollier D. 2016.. Pensar desde los comunes. Madrid:: Traficantes de Sueños. https://sursiendo.com/docs/Pensar_desde_los_comunes_web.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  127. 127.
    Lapoujade D. 2017.. As Existências Mínimas. São Paulo:: N-1
     [Google Scholar]
  128. 128.
    Moraes AP, Parra HZM. 2020.. Laboratórios do comum: experimentações políticas de uma ciência implicada. . Rev. Cent. Pesqui. Form. 10::113–39. https://www.sescsp.org.br/files/artigo/c23b1355/8dcc/4d12/8fb7/710c54c6d10b.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  129. 129.
    Rolnik S. 2018.. Esferas da Insurreição: Notas para uma Vida Não Cafetinada. São Paulo:: N-1
     [Google Scholar]
  130. 130.
    Cohen-Cruz J. 2020.. Beyond the “other”: seeking commonality in a divided world. . In A Busca do Comum: Práticas Artísticas para Outros Futuros Possíveis, ed. C Cruz, H Cruz, I Bezelga, M Falcão, R Aguiar , pp. 16–21. Porto:: i2ADS
     [Google Scholar]
  131. 131.
    Yaniz MS. 2023.. Alejandro Gómez Arias: flujos minerales. . Artishock: Revista de Arte Contemporânea, Febr. https://artishockrevista.com/2023/02/15/alejandro-gomez-arias-flujos-minerales/
    [Google Scholar]
  132. 132.
    Hirose E, La Rosa N. 2016.. Moving mountains: extractive landscapes of Peru. Exhib. , Visual Arts Center, Univ. Tex., Austin, Tex:. https://utvac.org/event/moving-mountains-extractive-landscapes-peru-edi-hirose-nancy-la-rosa
    [Google Scholar]
  133. 133.
    Serafini P. 2022.. Creating Worlds Otherwise: Art, Collective Action, and (Post)Extractivism. Nashville, TN:: Vanderbilt Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  134. 134.
    de La Cadena M. 2018.. Natureza incomum: histórias do antropoceno. . Rev. Inst. Estud. Bras. 69::95–117
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  135. 135.
    Moraes A. 2021.. Sugar Cane Fields Forever: Enganar a Plantocracia. São Paulo:: N-1
     [Google Scholar]
  136. 136.
    Blaser M, de La Cadena M. 2017.. The uncommons: an introduction. . Anthropologica 59:(2):185–93
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  137. 137.
    Barbosa de Almeida MW. 2013.. Caipora e outros conflitos ontológicos. . Rev. Antropol. UFSCar 5:(1):7–28
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  138. 138.
    Biset E. 2020.. ¿Qué es una ontología política?. Rev. Int. Pensam. Polít. 15::323–46
     [Google Scholar]
  139. 139.
    Guattari F. 2011.. As Três Ecologias, transl. MCF Bittencourt . Campinas, Braz:.: Papirus
     [Google Scholar]
  140. 140.
    Santos AB. 2018.. Somos da terra. . Piseagrama 12::44–51
     [Google Scholar]
  141. 141.
    Fagundes GM. 2022.. Sociedade contra a Plantation: uma ressemantização ecológica dos quilombos. . In Uma Ecologia Decolonial: Pensar a Partir do Mundo Caribenho, ed. M Ferdinand , pp. 311–16. São Paulo:: UBU. , 1st ed..
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-112922-112400
Loading
Artistic Practices in the Anthropocene
Annual Review of Environment and Resources 49, 223 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-112922-112400
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-112922-112400
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-112922-112400
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplemental Materials

  • Supplemental Figures

file format pdf download PDF
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error