1932

Abstract

This article surveys the literature on sovereign debt sustainability from its origins in the mid-1980s to the present and focuses on four debates. First, we evaluate the shift from an accounting-based view of debt sustainability using government borrowing rates to a model-based view that uses stochastic discount rates. Second, we review empirical tests, focusing on the relationship between primary balances and debt. Third, we discuss debt sustainability in the presence of rollover risk. And fourth, we evaluate whether government borrowing costs below rates of growth ( < ) generate a free lunch, in the sense that debt sustainability does not require future primary surpluses. We argue that liquidity services provided by sovereign debt may indeed lead to a free lunch, albeit one of limited size. The value of such services depends on the credibility of the central bank, which can be accumulated via prudent policies and subsequently drawn on to allow for looser fiscal policy.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-112921-110812
2022-11-01
2024-10-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/financial/14/1/annurev-financial-112921-110812.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-112921-110812&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Ahmed S, Rogers JH. 1995. Government budget deficits and trade deficits: Are present value constraints satisfied in long-term data?. J. Monet. Econ. 36:2351–74
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aiyagari SR, McGrattan ER. 1998. The optimum quantity of debt. J. Monet. Econ. 42:3447–69
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Anand R, van Wijnbergen S. 1989. Inflation and the financing of government expenditure. World Bank Econ. Rev. 3:117–38
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Andolfatto D. 2021. Is it time for some unpleasant monetary arithmetic?. Fed. Reserve Bank St. Louis Rev. 103:30315–32
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Andolfatto D, Martin FM. 2018. Monetary policy and liquid government debt. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 89:183–99
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Angeletos G-M, Collard F, Dellas H. 2020. Public debt as private liquidity: optimal policy Unpublished manuscript MIT, Cambridge, MA:
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Barro RJ. 1979. On the determination of the public debt. J. Political Econ. 87:5940–71
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Berentsen A, Waller C. 2018. Liquidity premiums on government debt and the fiscal theory of the price level. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 89:173–82
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Blanchard OJ. 1984. Current and anticipated deficits, interest rates and economic activity. Eur. Econ. Rev. 25:17–27
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Blanchard OJ. 2019. Public debt and low interest rates. Am. Econ. Rev. 109:41197–229
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Blanchard OJ. 2022. Fiscal policy under low interest rates Unpublished manuscript, Peterson Inst. Int. Econ. Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Blanchard OJ, Huertas G, Kister M. 2021. Notes on debt limits, uncertainty, and sudden stops Work. Pap., Peterson Inst. Int. Econ Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bohn H. 1995. The sustainability of budget deficits in a stochastic economy. J. Money Credit Bank. 27:1257–71
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bohn H. 1998. The behavior of U.S. public debt and deficits. Q. J. Econ. 113:3949–63
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bohn H 2008. The sustainability of fiscal policy in the United States. Sustainability of Public Debt R Neck, J-E Sturm Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Brunnermeier MK, Merkel S, Sannikov Y. 2021. Debt as safe asset. Unpublished manuscript Princeton Univ. Princeton, NJ:
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Buiter WH. 1983. Measurement of the public sector deficit and its implications for policy evaluation and design. IMF Staff Pap. 30:2306–49
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Buiter WH. 1985. A guide to public sector debt and deficits. Econ. Policy 1:113–79
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Cagan PD 1956. The monetary dynamics of hyperinflation. Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money M Friedman 25–117 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Calvo G. 1988. Servicing the public debt: the role of expectations. Am. Econ. Rev. 78:4647–61
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Camous A, Cooper R. 2019.. ‘ Whatever it takes’ is all you need: monetary policy and debt fragility. Am. Econ. J. Macroecon. 11:438–81
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Chamon M, Ostry JD. 2021. A future with high public debt: Low-for-long is not low forever. IMFBlog Apr. 20. https://blogs.imf.org/2021/04/20/a-future-with-high-public-debt-low-for-long-is-not-low-forever/
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Cochrane JH. 2005. Money as stock. J. Monet. Econ. 52:3501–28
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Cochrane JH. 2021a. r < g. Unpublished manuscript. Hoover Inst. Stanford, CA:
  25. Cochrane JH. 2021b. The fiscal theory of the price level Unpublished manuscript, Hoover Inst. Stanford, CA:
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Cole HL, Kehoe TJ. 1996. A self-fulfilling model of Mexico's 1994–1995 debt crisis. J. Int. Econ. 41:3–4309–30
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Cole HL, Kehoe TJ. 2000. Self-fulfilling debt crises. Rev. Econ. Stud. 67:191–116
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Corsetti G, Dedola L. 2016. The mystery of the printing press: monetary policy and self-fulfilling debt crises. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 14:61329–71
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Du W, Pflueger CE, Schreger J. 2020. Sovereign debt portfolios, bond risks, and the credibility of monetary policy. J. Finance 75:63097–3138
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Engel C, Park J. 2022. Debauchery and original sin: the currency composition of sovereign debt. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc 20:31095144
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Eur. Bank Reconstr. Dev 2010. Transition report 2010: recovery and reform Eur. Bank Reconstr. Dev London:
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Farhi E, Maggiori M. 2018. A model of the international monetary system. Q. J. Econ. 133:1295–355
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Ghosh AR, Kim JI, Mendoza EG, Ostry JD, Qureshi MS. 2013. Fiscal fatigue, fiscal space and debt sustainability in advanced economies. Econ. J. 123:566F4–30
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Hakkio CS, Rush M. 1991. Is the budget deficit “too large?. Econ. Inq. 29:3429–45
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hamilton JD, Flavin MA. 1986. On the limitations of government borrowing: a framework for empirical testing. Am. Econ. Rev. 76:4808–19
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Haug AA. 1991. Cointegration and government borrowing constraints: evidence for the United States. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 9:197–101
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Holmstrom B, Tirole J. 1998. Private and public supply of liquidity. J. Political Econ. 106:11–40
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Int. Monet. Fund (IMF) 2013. Staff guidance note for public debt sustainability analysis in market-access countries Policy Pap., IMF Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Int. Monet. Fund (IMF) 2021a. Review of the debt sustainability framework for market access countries Policy Pap. 2021/003, IMF Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Int. Monet. Fund (IMF) 2021b. United States: 2021 Article IV consultation Ctry. Rep. 2021/162, IMF Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Jeanne O 2003. Why do emerging economies borrow in foreign currency? Work. Pap. 03/177, Int. Monet. Fund Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Jeanne O, Zettelmeyer J 2002. Original sin, balance sheet crises, and the roles of international lending. Work. Pap. 02/234, Int. Monet. Fund Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Jiang Z, Lustig H, Van Nieuwerburgh S, Xiaolan MZ. 2019. The U.S. debt valuation puzzle NBER Work. Pap 26583
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Kelton S. 2020. The Deficit Myth: Modern Monetary Theory and How to Build a Better Economy New York: Public Aff.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Kremers JJM. 1988. Long-run limits on the U.S. federal debt. Econ. Lett. 28:3259–62
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Kremers JJM. 1989. U.S. federal indebtedness and the conduct of fiscal policy. J. Monet. Econ. 23:2219–38
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Leeper E. 1991. Equilibria under ‘active’ and ‘passive’ monetary and fiscal policies. J. Monet. Econ. 27:1129–47
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Lian W, Presbitero AF, Wiriadinata U. 2020. Public debt and r − g at risk Work. Pap. 20/137, Int. Monet. Fund Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Lorenzoni G, Werning I. 2019. Slow moving debt crises. Am. Econ. Rev. 109:93229–63
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Lucas RE. 1978. Asset prices in an exchange economy. Econometrica 46:61429–45
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Mauro P, Zhou J. 2021. r− g < 0: Can we sleep more soundly?. IMF Econ. Rev. 69:197–229
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Mendoza EG, Ostry JD. 2008. International evidence on fiscal solvency: Is fiscal policy “responsible”?. J. Monet. Econ. 55:61081–93
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Moreno Badia M, Medas P, Gupta P, Xiang Y 2020. Debt is not free Work. Pap. 20/1, Int. Monet. Fund Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Olijslagers S, de Vette N, van Wijnbergen S. 2020. Debt sustainability when r − g < 0: no free lunch after all. Disc. Pap. 15478, Cent. Econ. Policy Res London:
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Phelps ES. 1973. Inflation in the theory of public finance. Scand. J. Econ. 75:167–82
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Reinhart CM, Sbrancia MB. 2015. The liquidation of government debt. Econ. Policy 30:82291–333
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Reis R. 2021. The constraint on public debt when r < g but g < m Unpublished manuscript, London School Econ., London
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Rogoff K. 2021. Fiscal sustainability in the aftermath of the great pause. J. Policy Model. 43:783–93
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Sachs J. 1984. Theoretical Issues in International Borrowing Princeton Stud. Int. Finance 54: Princeton, NJ: Dep. Econ., Princeton Univ.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Sargent TJ, Wallace N. 1981. Some unpleasant monetarist arithmetic. Fed. Reserve Bank Minneap. Q. Rev. 5:31–17
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Sims CA. 1999. Domestic currency denominated government debt as equity in the primary surplus Unpublished manuscript, Princeton Univ. Princeton, NJ:
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Smith GW, Zin SE. 1991. Persistent deficits and the market value of government debt. J. Appl. Econom. 6:131–44
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Trehan B, Walsh CE. 1988. Testing intertemporal budget constraints: theory and applications to U.S. federal budget and current account deficits. J. Money Credit Bank. 23:2206–23
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Trehan B, Walsh CE. 1991. Common trends, the government's budget constraint, and revenue smoothing. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 12:2–342544
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Wilcox DW. 1989. The sustainability of government deficits: implications of the present-value borrowing constraint. J. Money Credit Bank. 21:3291–306
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Woodford M. 1990. Public debt as private liquidity. Am. Econ. Rev. 80:2382–88
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Woodford M. 1994. Monetary policy and price level determinacy in a cash-in-advance economy. Econ. Theory 4:3345–80
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-112921-110812
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-112921-110812
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error