1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics
  4. Volume 11, 2010
  5. Article

Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics

Volume 11, 2010

Dispatches from the Evolution Wars: Shifting Tactics and Expanding Battlefields

Abstract

Creationism continues to present a challenge to the teaching of evolution in the United States. With attempts to ban evolution education and to “balance” the teaching of evolution with creationism unavailing, creationists are increasingly favoring the approach of misrepresenting evolution as scientifically controversial. To understand the ongoing challenges facing evolution education in the United States, it is necessary to appreciate creationist actions at the different levels of educational governance—state legislatures, state boards of education, local boards of education, and finally the individual classroom—that serve as the battlegrounds for the evolution education wars. Scientists are in a unique position to defend the teaching of evolution, both by resisting creationist incursions as they occur and by helping to improve the teaching of evolution at both the precollege and college levels.

Keyword(s): creation science, creationism, evolution education, intelligent design
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-genom-082509-141815
2010-09-22
2024-10-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/genom/11/1/annurev-genom-082509-141815.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-genom-082509-141815&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Alters BJ. 1.  2005. Teaching Biological Evolution in Higher Education: Methodological, Religious, and Nonreligious Issues Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett [Google Scholar]
  2. Alters BJ, Alters SM. 2.  2001. Defending Evolution: A Guide to the Evolution/Creation Controversy Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett [Google Scholar]
  3. Alters BJ, Nelson CE. 3.  2002. Teaching evolution in higher education. Evolution 56:101891–901 [Google Scholar]
  4. 4. American Association of University Professors 2008. Academic freedom and teaching evolution http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/about/bus/archive/AM/am08.htm [Google Scholar]
  5. Anderson T. 5.  2009. Controversy on campus over book by Darwin. Los Angeles Daily News Nov. 18, 2009. http://www.dailynews.com/search/ci_13818898 [Google Scholar]
  6. 6. Anonymous 2006. Darwin policy changes little. The News-Star (Monroe, Louisiana), Dec. 3, 2006, A13 [Google Scholar]
  7. 7. Anonymous 2010. Voters' message to Board of Education is crystal clear. Austin American-Statesman Apr. 15, 2010, A12 [Google Scholar]
  8. Ansary T. 8.  2004. The muddle machine: confessions of a textbook editor. Edutopia Nov/Dec:31–35 [Google Scholar]
  9. 9. Anti-Defamation League 2008. Anti-evolution film misappropriates the Holocaust http://www.adl.org/PresRele/HolNa_52/5277_52.htm [Google Scholar]
  10. Arber W. 10.  2009. Statement by the Pontifical Academy of Sciences on current scientific knowledge on cosmic evolution and biological evolution. Scientific Insights into the Evolution of the Universe and of Life W Arber, N Cabibbo, M Sánchez Sorondo 584–90 Vatican City: Pontifical Acad. Sci. [Google Scholar]
  11. Attie AD, Sober E, Numbers RL, Amasino RM, Cox B. 11.  et al. 2006. Defending science education against intelligent design: a call to action. J. Clin. Investig. 116:51134–38 [Google Scholar]
  12. Austin S. 12.  1994. Grand Canyon: Monument to Catastrophe Santee, CA: Inst. Creation Res. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bandoli JH. 13.  2008. Do state science standards matter? Comparing student perceptions of the coverage of evolution in Indiana and Ohio public high schools. Am. Biol. Teach. 70:4212–16 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bartelt KB. 14.  2004. Debates: the drive-by shootings of critical thinking. Rep. Nat. Cent. Sci. Educ. 24:630–31 [Google Scholar]
  15. Behe M. 15.  2005. Testimony in Kitzmiller v. Dover. http://ncse.com/files/pub/legal/kitzmiller/trial_transcripts/2005_1018_day11_am.pdf
  16. Berkman M, Plutzer E. 16.  2010. Evolution, Creationism, and the Battle to Control America's Classrooms Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  17. Berkman MB, Pacheco JS, Plutzer E. 17.  2008. Evolution and creationism in America's classrooms: a national portrait. PLoS Biol. 6:5e124 [Google Scholar]
  18. Berkman MB, Plutzer E. 18.  2005. Ten Thousand Democracies: Politics and Public Opinion in America's School Districts Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  19. Branch G. 19.  2005. Anti-evolution legislation in Utah. Rep. Nat. Cent. Sci. Educ. 25:5–66–8 [Google Scholar]
  20. Branch G.20.  2005. President Bush addresses “intelligent design.”. Rep. Nat. Cent. Sci. Educ. 25:3–413–14 [Google Scholar]
  21. Branch G. 21.  2006. “Critical analysis” defeated in Ohio. Rep. Nat. Cent. Sci. Educ. 26:37–11 [Google Scholar]
  22. Branch G. 22.  2007. The rise and fall of the Vitter earmark. Rep. Nat. Cent. Sci. Educ. 27:5–67–9 [Google Scholar]
  23. Branch G. 23.  2008. Creationism as a global phenomenon. Darwin and the Bible: The Cultural Confrontation RH Robbins, MN Cohen 137–51 Boston: Pearson Educ. [Google Scholar]
  24. Branch G. 24.  2008. A setback for the ICR in Texas. Rep. Nat. Cent. Sci. Educ. 28:211–15 [Google Scholar]
  25. Branch G, Mead LS. 25.  2008. “Theory” in theory and practice. Evol. Educ. Outreach 1:3287–89 [Google Scholar]
  26. Branch G, Scott EC. 26.  2002. The antievolution law that wasn't. Am. Biol. Teach. 65:3165–66 [Google Scholar]
  27. Branch G, Scott EC. 27.  2009. The latest face of creationism. Sci. Am. 300:192–99 [Google Scholar]
  28. Broder DS. 28.  2007. In GOP presidential debate, religion becomes politics. Washington Post May 5:A4 [Google Scholar]
  29. Brumfiel G. 29.  2005. Intelligent design: Who has designs on your students' minds?. Nature 434:70371062–65 [Google Scholar]
  30. Catsoulis J. 30.  2008. Resentment over Darwin evolves into a documentary. The New York Times Apr. 14:E13 [Google Scholar]
  31. Chapman B, Meyer SC. 31.  2002. Darwin would love this debate. Seattle Times Jun. 10, 2002. http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=20020610&slug=chapmanop10 [Google Scholar]
  32. Chapman M. 32.  2007. Forty Days and Forty Nights: Darwin, Intelligent Design, God, Oxycontin and Other Oddities on Trial in Pennsylvania New York: HarperCollins [Google Scholar]
  33. 33. Coalition of Scientific Societies 2008. Evolution and its discontents: a role for scientists in science education. FASEB J. 22:1–4 [Google Scholar]
  34. Comfort R. 34.  2009. Special introduction. The Origin of Species1–54 Alachua, FL: Bridge Logos Found. [Google Scholar]
  35. Davis P, Kenyon DH. 35.  1989. Of Pandas and People Dallas, TX: Haughton [Google Scholar]
  36. Dawkins R. 36.  2003. Why I won't debate creationists. Free Inquiry 23:112–14 [Google Scholar]
  37. Dembski WA, Wells J. 37.  2008. The Design of Life Dallas, TX: Found. Thought Ethics [Google Scholar]
  38. Deslatte M. 38.  2009. Board: no religion allowed in La. science classes. Associated Press Jan. 15, 2009 [Google Scholar]
  39. 39. Discovery Institute 2001. Getting the Facts Straight: A Viewer's Guide to PBS's Evolution Seattle: Discov. Inst. Press [Google Scholar]
  40. Dobzhansky T. 40.  1973. Nothing in biology makes sense except in light of evolution. Am. Biol. Teach. 35:125–29 [Google Scholar]
  41. Evans S. 41.  2003. Evolution: still deep in the heart of textbooks. Rep. Nat. Cent. Sci. Educ. 23:5–64–7 [Google Scholar]
  42. 42. Fifty-six professional scientific organizations 2005. Amicus brief in Selman v. Cobb County. http://ncse.com/webfm_send/51
  43. 43. Florida Department of Education 2008. Florida Science: Sunshine Science Standards http://www.fldoestem.org/Uploads/1/docs/Science%20Standards%20Both-FINAL%203-20-08.pdf [Google Scholar]
  44. Forrest B. 44.  2001. The wedge at work: how intelligent design creationism is wedging its way into the cultural and academic mainstream. Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics RT Pennock 6–53 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  45. Forrest B, Branch G. 45.  2005. Wedging creationism into the academy. Academe 91:137–41 [Google Scholar]
  46. Forrest B, Gross PR. 46.  2007. Creationism's Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design New York: Oxford Univ. Press. Rev. ed. [Google Scholar]
  47. Fuller S. 47.  2005. Testimony in Kitzmiller v. Dover. http://ncse.com/files/pub/legal/kitzmiller/trial_transcripts/2005_1024_day15_am.pdf
  48. Gibbons A. 48.  2009. Celebrity fossil primate: missing link or weak link?. Science 324:59311124–25 [Google Scholar]
  49. Gregory TR. 49.  2008. Evolution as fact, theory, and path. Evol. Educ. Outreach 1:146–52 [Google Scholar]
  50. Gross PR. 50.  2005. The State of State Science Standards Washington, DC: Fordham Inst. [Google Scholar]
  51. Hanna J. 51.  2007. Science standards evolve again. Lawrence Journal-World Feb 14:A1 [Google Scholar]
  52. Harrold FB, Eve RA. 52.  1990. The Creationist Movement in Modern America Boston: Twayne [Google Scholar]
  53. Heaton TH. 53.  2007. A visit to the new Creation “Museum.”. Rep. Nat. Cent. Sci. Educ. 27:1–221–24 [Google Scholar]
  54. Heinauer L. 54.  2008. Scientists wade into curriculum debate on side of evolution. Austin American-Statesman Oct. 1, 2008, B1 [Google Scholar]
  55. Hendrix S. 55.  2009. The genesis of a debate. Washington Post May 11, 2009, A1 [Google Scholar]
  56. Hillis DM. 56.  2007. Making evolution relevant and exciting to biology students. Evolution 61:61261–64 [Google Scholar]
  57. Holden A, Scott EC. 57.  2008. Marketing Expelled. Rep. Nat. Cent. Sci. Educ. 28:5–615–17 [Google Scholar]
  58. Holden C. 58.  2002. Design's evolving image. Science 297:55891991 [Google Scholar]
  59. Humes E. 59.  2007. Monkey Girl: Evolution, Education, Religion, and the Battle for America's Soul New York: Ecco [Google Scholar]
  60. Huxley L. 60.  1900. Life and Letters of Thomas Henry Huxley 1 London: Macmillan [Google Scholar]
  61. 61. Institute for Creation Research 2009. Plaintiff's original complaint in Institute for Creation Research Graduate School v. Raymund A. Paredes et al. http://ncse.com/webfm_send/814
  62. Johnstone G, McMaster J. 62.  2007. Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial Boston: NOVA and Vulcan Productions 112 min [Google Scholar]
  63. Joyce T. 63.  2008. Obama talks about York; we got five minutes to ask Obama your questions. York Daily Record/Sunday News Mar. 30, 2008, local sec. 1, 7 [Google Scholar]
  64. King R. 64.  2006. Intelligent design bill fails to materialize. Indianapolis Star Jan. 11:B1 [Google Scholar]
  65. Koeppel D. 65.  2008. Banana: The Fate of the Fruit that Changed the World New York: Hudson Street Press [Google Scholar]
  66. Larson EJ. 66.  1997. Summer for the Gods: The Scopes Trial and America's Continuing Debate over Science and Religion New York: Basic Books [Google Scholar]
  67. Larson EJ. 67.  2003. Trial and Error: The American Controversy over Creation and Evolution New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 3rd. [Google Scholar]
  68. Leader B. 68.  2006. Darwin as theory now parish policy. The News-Star (Monroe, Louisiana), Nov. 30, 2006, A1 [Google Scholar]
  69. Leader B. 69.  2008. Hoffmann introduces his own academic freedom bill. The News-Star (Monroe, Louisiana), Apr. 23, 2008, B3 [Google Scholar]
  70. Lebo L. 70.  2008. The Devil in Dover: An Insider's Story of Dogma v. Darwin in Small-Town America New York: New Press [Google Scholar]
  71. Leiter B, Weisberg M. 71.  2010. Why evolutionary biology is (so far) irrelevant to legal regulation. Law Philos. 29:131–74 [Google Scholar]
  72. Lerner L. 72.  2000. Good Science, Bad Science: Teaching Evolution in the States Washington, DC: Fordham Found. [Google Scholar]
  73. Lienesch M. 73.  2007. In the Beginning: Fundamentalism, the Scopes Trial, and the Making of the Antievolution Movement Chapel Hill, NC: Univ. N. Carolina Press [Google Scholar]
  74. 74. Louisiana Coalition for Science 2009. Creationists continue to dictate BESE science education policy http://lasciencecoalition.org/2009/09/30/creationists-dictate-bese-policy/ [Google Scholar]
  75. Matzke N. 75.  2009. But isn't it creationism? The beginnings of intelligent design in the midst of the Arkansas and Louisiana legislation. But Is It Science? The Philosophical Question in the Creation/Evolution Controversy RT Pennock, M Ruse 377–413 Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books [Google Scholar]
  76. Matzke N, Gross P. 76.  2006. Analyzing critical analysis: the fallback antievolutionist strategy. Not in Our Classrooms: Why Intelligent Design Is Wrong for Our Schools EC Scott, G Branch 28–56 Boston: Beacon Press [Google Scholar]
  77. McDonald M. 77.  2002. The origins of life: a textbook case in Cobb County. Atlanta Journal-Constitution Apr. 14:1F [Google Scholar]
  78. McGill K. 78.  2009. Analysis: science-religion debate will continue. Associated Press Jan. 25 [Google Scholar]
  79. McKeever S. 79.  2007. So, what are the “7 C's” anyway? http://www.answersingenesis.org/museum/docs/7cs.asp [Google Scholar]
  80. Mead LS, Mates A. 80.  2009. Why science standards are important to a strong science curriculum and how states measure up. Evol. Educ. Outreach 2:3359–71 [Google Scholar]
  81. Metscher BD. 81.  2009. Postcards from the wedge: review and commentary on Explore Evolution: The Arguments For and Against Neo-Darwinism by Stephen C. Meyer et al. Evol. Dev. 11:1124–25 [Google Scholar]
  82. Meyer SC, Minnich S, Moneymaker J, Nelson PA, Seelke R. 82.  2007. Explore Evolution: The Arguments For and Against Neo-Darwinism Melbourne, Australia: Hill House [Google Scholar]
  83. Milburn J. 83.  2001. Evolution restored: board approves new science standards. Lawrence Journal-World Feb. 14, 2001. http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2001/feb/14/evolution_restored_board/ [Google Scholar]
  84. Miller JD, Scott EC, Okamoto S. 84.  2006. Public acceptance of evolution. Science 313:765–66 [Google Scholar]
  85. Miller K, Stein B. 85.  2008. Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed Directed by N Frankowski. Los Angeles: Premise Media Corp. 97 min [Google Scholar]
  86. Miller L.86.  2009. Creationism versus atheism: It's on! http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2009/11/23/origin_into_schools/ [Google Scholar]
  87. Mindell D. 87.  2006. The Evolving World: Evolution in Everyday Life Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  88. Minnich S. 88.  2005. Testimony in Kitzmiller v. Dover. http://ncse.com/files/pub/legal/kitzmiller/trial_transcripts/2005_1104_day21_am.pdf
  89. Mohn J. 89.  2009. Collapse of a Texas quote mine. Rep. Nat. Cent. Sci. Educ. 29:37–9 [Google Scholar]
  90. Moore JN, Slusher HS. 90.  1970. Biology: A Search for Order in Complexity Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan [Google Scholar]
  91. Moore R. 91.  2002. Teaching evolution: Do state standards matter?. BioScience 52:4378–81 [Google Scholar]
  92. Moore R. 92.  2004. How well do biology teachers understand the legal issues associated with the teaching of evolution?. BioScience 54:9860–65 [Google Scholar]
  93. Moore R. 93.  2004. When a biology teacher refuses to teach evolution: a talk with Rod LeVake. Am. Biol. Teach. 66:4246–50 [Google Scholar]
  94. Moore R, Kraemer K. 94.  2005. The teaching of evolution and creationism in Minnesota. Am. Biol. Teach. 67:8457–66 [Google Scholar]
  95. Morris H. 95.  1974. Scientific Creationism San Diego, CA: Creation-Life Publ. [Google Scholar]
  96. 96. National Academy of Sciences 2008. Science, Evolution, and Creationism Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press [Google Scholar]
  97. 97. National Center for Education Statistics 2003. The Condition of Education Washington, DC: US Gov. Print. Off. [Google Scholar]
  98. 98. National Center for Science Education 2008. Expelled exposed http://www.expelledexposed.com [Google Scholar]
  99. 99. National Center for Science Education 2008. Scientific inaccuracies at AiG's Creation “Museum.” http://ncse.com/taking-action/aig-creation-museum [Google Scholar]
  100. 100. National Center for Science Education 2009. Don McLeroy: “Someone has to stand up to experts!” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzrUt9CHtpY [Google Scholar]
  101. 101. National Center for Science Education 2009. Don't diss Darwin http://www.dontdissdarwin.com [Google Scholar]
  102. 102. National Conference on Teaching Evolution 2001. A blueprint for an evolution education workshop http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/ncte/twb/ [Google Scholar]
  103. Nehm R. 103.  2006. Faith-based evolution education?. BioScience 56:8638–39 [Google Scholar]
  104. Nelkin D. 104.  1977. Science Textbook Controversies and the Politics of Equal Time Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  105. Nelson CE. 105.  2008. Teaching evolution (and all of biology) more effectively: strategies for engagement, critical reasoning, and confronting misconceptions. Int. Comp. Biol. 48:2213–25 [Google Scholar]
  106. Nelson PA. 106.  2002. Life in the big tent: traditional creationism and the intelligent design movement. Christian Res. J. 24:420–2541–44 [Google Scholar]
  107. Newton S. 107.  2009. Creationism in the new Texas standards for earth and space science. Earth Sci. 25:230–33 [Google Scholar]
  108. Numbers R. 108.  2006. The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press. Rev. ed. [Google Scholar]
  109. Olson D. 109.  2009. More than 5600 people sign petition in favor of creationism. The Press-Examiner (Riverside, CA), Nov. 6, 2009. http://www.pe.com/localnews/highereducation/stories/PE_News_Local_S_lasierra06.47b3990.html [Google Scholar]
  110. Ortega T. 110.  2005. Your OFFICIAL program to the Scopes II Kansas monkey trial. The Pitch May 5, 2005. http://www.pitch.com/2005-05-05/news/your-official-program-to-the-scopes-ii-kansas-monkey-trial/ [Google Scholar]
  111. Padian K. 111.  2008. Trickle-down evolution: an approach to getting major evolutionary adaptive changes into textbooks and curricula. Int. Comp. Biol. 48:2175–88 [Google Scholar]
  112. Parker G, Graham K, Shimmin D, Thompson G. 112.  1997. Biology: God's Living Creation Pensacola, FL: A Beka Books, 2nd. [Google Scholar]
  113. Pennock RT. 113.  1999. Tower of Babel: The Evidence against the New Creationism Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  114. Pennock RT. 114.  2003. Creationism and intelligent design. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 4:143–63 [Google Scholar]
  115. Pinkston WS Jr. 115.  1991. Biology for Christian Schools Greenville, SC: Bob Jones Univ. Press, 2nd. [Google Scholar]
  116. Porch TE, Batdorf BR. 116.  2005. Biology for Christian Schools Greenville, SC: Bob Jones Univ. Press, 3rd. [Google Scholar]
  117. Rapoport A. 117.  2009. Trouble in the big tent. The Texas Tribune Nov. 3, 2009. http://www.texastribune.org/stories/2009/nov/03/republican-rift-plays-out-board-education-race/ [Google Scholar]
  118. Rosenau J. 118.  2009. Don't mess with textbooks http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/dont_mess_with_textbooks/ [Google Scholar]
  119. Rosenhouse J, Branch G. 119.  2006. Media coverage of “intelligent design.”. BioScience 56:3247–52 [Google Scholar]
  120. Rothschild S. 120.  2005. Criticism of evolution added to science standards. Lawrence Journal-World Nov. 9, 2005. http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2005/nov/09/criticism_evolution_added_science_standards/?evolution [Google Scholar]
  121. Sager C. 121.  2008. Voices for Evolution Berkeley, CA: Natl. Cent. Sci. Educ., 3rd. [Google Scholar]
  122. Sarfati J. 122.  2002. Refuting Evolution 2 Green Forest, AR: Master Books [Google Scholar]
  123. Schafersman S. 123.  1982. Censorship of evolution in Texas. Creation/Evol. 10:30–34 [Google Scholar]
  124. Scholfield R. 124.  2005. Sham: scientists' right to boycott evolution hearings. Wichita Eagle Mar. 30, 2005, 6A [Google Scholar]
  125. Scott EC. 125.  1994. Debates and the globetrotters. Creation/Evol. 14:222–26 [Google Scholar]
  126. Scott EC. 126.  1999. Bleeding Kansas: What happened? What's next?. Rep. Natl. Cent. Sci. Educ. 19:47–9 [Google Scholar]
  127. Scott EC. 127.  2006. Creationism and evolution: It's the American way. Cell 124:3449–51 [Google Scholar]
  128. Scott EC. 128.  2009. Evolution versus Creationism: An Introduction Berkeley, CA: Univ. Calif. Press, 2nd. [Google Scholar]
  129. Scott EC. 129.  2009. How creationist “Origin” distorts Darwin. US News World Rep. Oct 30, 2009. http://www.usnews.com/blogs/god-and-country/2009/10/30/how-creationist-origin-distorts-darwin.html [Google Scholar]
  130. Scott EC, Branch G. 130.  2008. The OOPSIE compromise—a big mistake. Evol. Educ. Outreach 1:2147–49 [Google Scholar]
  131. Scott EC, Branch G. 131.  2009. Don't call it “Darwinism.”. Evol. Educ. Outreach 2:190–94 [Google Scholar]
  132. Sentell W. 132.  2009. Procedure crafted for handling evolution-materials complaints. Baton Rouge Advocate Sept. 17, 2009, 1A [Google Scholar]
  133. Slack G. 133.  2007. The Battle over the Meaning of Everything: Evolution, Intelligent Design, and a School Board in Dover, PA San Francisco: Wiley [Google Scholar]
  134. Smith MU. 134.  1994. Counterpoint: belief, understanding, and the teaching of evolution. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 31:5591–97 [Google Scholar]
  135. Stepp DR, Torres K. 135.  2006. Cobb gives up on evolution book stickers. Atlanta Journal-Constitution Dec. 20, 2006, 1A [Google Scholar]
  136. Talbot M. 136.  2005. Darwin in the dock. New Yorker Dec. 5, 2005 66–77 [Google Scholar]
  137. Torres K, Rankin B. 137.  2006. Stickers ruling tossed. Atlanta Journal-Constitution May 26, 2006, 1E [Google Scholar]
  138. Toumey C. 138.  1994. God's Own Scientists: Creationists in a Secular World New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  139. 139. University of California Museum of Paleontology 2004. Understanding evolution http://evolution.berkeley.edu [Google Scholar]
  140. Wiles JR, Branch G. 140.  2006. Teachers who won't, don't, or can't teach evolution properly: a burning issue. Am. Biol. Teach. 70:16–7 [Google Scholar]
  141. Winerip M. 141.  2006. Evolution's lonely battle in a Georgia classroom. New York Times Jun. 28, 2006, B9 [Google Scholar]
  142. Wise K.142.  1990. Baraminology: a young-earth creation biosystematic method. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Creationism RE Walsh 2345–60 Pittsburgh, PA: Creation Sci. Fellowship, Inc. [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-genom-082509-141815
Loading
Dispatches from the Evolution Wars: Shifting Tactics and Expanding Battlefields
Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 11, 317 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genom-082509-141815
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-genom-082509-141815
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-genom-082509-141815
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error