1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Law and Social Science
  4. Volume 20, 2024
  5. Article

Annual Review of Law and Social Science

Volume 20, 2024

The Life of the Rule of Law

Abstract

The rule of law has become all things to all people, which is precisely why it has been hard to define. Rather than attempt that feat, this article traces how the rule of law has developed as a set of specific governing practices both in the history of comparative law and in recent policy debates. Whereas national legal traditions blended ideas about the constraining effects of law with normative ideas about the organization of politics, the policy conversation has tended to depoliticize law altogether. As a result, it became possible for aspirational autocrats determined to undermine normative legal constraints to game the system and use law for autocratic ends. The rule of law is now beginning a new life, however, through a movement to deparochialize law and re-embed it in transnational norms. This rule of law writ large has become a new touchstone for holding political power accountable through law.

Keyword(s): backsliding, constitutionalism, democracy, populism, rule of law
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-010924-103836
2024-10-17
2025-02-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lawsocsci/20/1/annurev-lawsocsci-010924-103836.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-010924-103836&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Allan TRS. 1994.. Law, Liberty, and Justice: The Legal Foundations of British Constitutionalism. Oxford, UK:: Clarendon
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Alter KJ. 2014.. The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights. Princeton, NJ:: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Baik T-U. 2012.. Emerging Regional Human Rights Systems in Asia. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bakardjieva Engelbrekt A, Groussot X, eds. 2019.. The Future of Europe: Political and Legal Integration Beyond Brexit. Oxford, UK:: Hart
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Baker J. 2019.. Introduction to English Legal History. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press. , 5th ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bartels L. 2023.. Democracy Erodes from the Top: Leaders, Citizens, and the Challenge of Populism in Europe. Princeton, NJ:: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Benton L. 2002.. Law and Colonial Cultures: Legal Regimes in World History, 1400–1900. New York:: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Benton L. 2010.. A Search for Sovereignty: Law and Geography in European Empires, 1400–1900. New York:: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Benton L, Ross RJ, eds. 2013.. Legal Pluralism and Empires, 1500–1850. New York:: NYU Press
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Berda Y. 2022.. Colonial Bureaucracy and Contemporary Citizenship. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bermeo N. 2016.. On democratic backsliding. . J. Democr. 271::5–19
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bingham T. 2010.. The Rule of Law. London:: Allen Lane
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Carothers T. 1998.. The rule of law revival. . Foreign Aff. 77::95–106
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  14. Constable M. 1994.. The Law of the Other: The Mixed Jury and Changing Conceptions of Citizenship, Law, and Knowledge. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Const. Unit UK. 1998.. Checks and balances in single-chamber parliaments: a comparative analysis. Publ. , Const. Unit UK, London:. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/spp/publications/unit-publications/24.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Corrales J. 2015.. Autocratic legalism in Venezuela. . J. Democr. 26:(2):37–51
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cornell D, Muvangua N, eds. 2012.. uBuntu and the Law: African Ideals and Post-Apartheid Jurisprudence. New York:: Fordham Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Costa P. 2007.. The rule of law: a historical introduction. . See Costa & Zolo 2007 , pp. 73–149
  19. Costa P, Zolo D, eds. 2007.. The Rule Of Law: History, Theory And Criticism. Dordrecht, Neth:.: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Craig P. 1997.. Formal and substantive conceptions of the rule of law: an analytical framework. . Public Law 3::467–87
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Dann P, Reigner M, Bönnemann M, eds. 2020.. The Global South and Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Deik C. 2014.. Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments in Colombia. Saarland, Ger:.: LAP Lambert Publ.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Desai D. 2023.. Expert Ignorance: The Law and Politics of Rule of Law Reform. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Dezalay Y, Garth B. 2001.. The import and export of law and legal institutions. . In Adapting Legal Cultures, ed. D Nelken, J Feest , pp. 241–56. Portland, OR:: Hart
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Dicey AV. 1982 (1885).. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. London:: Macmillan
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Dworkin RM. 1970.. What is the rule of law?. Antioch Rev. 302::151–55
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  27. Dworkin RM. 1977.. Political judges and the rule of law. . Proc. Br. Acad. 64::258–87
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Eco U. 1998.. From Marco Polo to Leibniz: stories of intellectual misunderstandings. . In Serendipities, transl. W Weaver , pp. 52–75. New York:: Columbia Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Fraenkel E. 2010 (1938).. The Dual State: A Contribution to the Theory of Dictatorship. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Freedom House. 2023.. Freedom in the world 2023. Rep. , Freedom House, Washington, DC:. https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2023-03/FIW_World_2023_DigtalPDF.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Fuller L. 1964.. The Morality of Law. New Haven, CT:: Yale Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Gallie WB. 1956.. Essentially contested concepts. . Proc. Aristot. Soc. 56::167–98
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gardbaum S. 2013.. The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism: Theory and Practice. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Gathi JT, Akinkugbe OD. 2021.. Judicialization of election disputes in Africa's international courts. . Law Contemp. Probl. 84::181–218
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Gibson E. 2012.. Boundary Control: Subnational Authoritarianism in Federal Democracies. New York:: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Golub S. 2006.. A house without a foundation. . In Promoting the Rule of Law Abroad: In Search of Knowledge, ed. T Carothers , pp. 105–13. Washington, DC:: Carnegie Endow. Int. Peace
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Greenberg U. 2015.. The Weimar Century. Princeton, NJ:: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Hailbronner M. 2014.. Rethinking the rise of the German Constitutional Court: from anti-Nazism to value formalism. . Int. J. Const. Law 12::626–49
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Halpérin J-L. 2011.. Law in books and law in action: the problem of legal change. . Maine Law Rev. 64::45–76
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Hart HLA. 1958.. Positivism and the separation of law and morals. . Harvard Law Rev. 71::593–629
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  41. Heuschling L. 2021.. État du droit: Gallicization of the Rechtsstaat. See Meierhenrich & Loughlin 2021 , pp. 69–85
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Holmes OW. 1881.. The Common Law. Boston:: Little, Brown
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Hurd I. 2017.. How to Do Things with International Law. Princeton, NJ:: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Inter-Am. Court Hum. Rights. 2021.. Presidential reelection without term limits in the context of the inter-American system. Advis. Opin. OC-28/21, June 7 , Inter-Am. Court Hum. Rights, San José:. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/opiniones/seriea_28_eng.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Jacobsohn G. 2010.. Constitutional Identity. Cambridge, MA:: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Jellinek G. 1880.. Die rechtliche Natur der staatenverträge: Ein Beitrag zur juristischen Construction des Völkerrechts. Vienna:: Alfred Holder
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Kantorowicz E. 1957.. The King's Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Theology. Princeton, NJ:: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Kay RS. 2014.. The Glorious Revolution and the Continuity of Law. Washington, DC:: Cathol. Univ. Am. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Kelsen H. 1967 (1934).. Pure Theory of Law. Berkeley:: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Kjaer PF. 2022.. What is transformative law?. Eur. Law Open 14::760–80
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  51. Kleinfeld R. 2012.. Advancing the Rule of Law Abroad: Next Generation Reform. Washington, DC:: Carnegie Endow. Int. Peace
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Krygier M. 2016.. Tempering power. . In Constitutionalism and Rule of Law: Bridging Idealism and Realism, ed. M Adams, A Meuwese, H Ballin , pp. 34–59. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Krygier M. 2021.. Democracy and the rule of law. . See Meierhenrich & Loughlin 2021 , pp. 406–24
  54. Lacey N. 2007.. H.L.A. Hart's rule of law: the limits of philosophy in historical perspective. . Quad. Fiorent. 36::1203–24
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Maldonado DB, ed. 2013.. Constitutionalism of the Global South. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Marmor A. 2004.. The rule of law and its limits. . Law Philos. 23::1–43
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Marshall D, ed. 2014.. The International Rule of Law Movement: A Crisis of Legitimacy and the Way Forward. Cambridge, MA:: Harvard Law School Hum. Rights Progr.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Meierhenrich J. 2021.. Rechtsstaat versus the rule of law. . See Meierhenrich & Loughlin 2021 , pp. 39–67
  59. Meierhenrich J, Loughlin M, eds. 2021.. The Cambridge Companion to the Rule of Law. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Merke F, Stuenkel O, Feldmann AE. 2021.. Reimagining Regional Governance in Latin America. Washington, DC:: Carnegie Endow. Int. Peace
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Merry SE. 1988.. Legal pluralism. . Law Soc. Rev. 22::869–96
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  62. Mohd KMH. 2022.. An Islamic perspective on the rule of law. . IIUM Law J. 302::201–25
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  63. Mudde C, Kaltwasser CR. 2017.. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Neate F. 2009.. The Rule of Law: Perspectives from Around the Globe. London:: Lexis-Nexis
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Neumann F. 1986 (1936).. The Rule of Law: Political Theory and the Legal System in Modern Society. Heidelberg, Ger:.: Berg
     [Google Scholar]
  66. O'Donnell G. 2004.. The quality of democracy: why the rule of law matters. . J. Democr. 154::32–46
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  67. Okafor OC, Dzah GEK. 2021.. The African human rights system as ‘norm leader’: three case studies. . Afr. Hum. Rights Law J. 21::669–98
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  68. Partlett W. 2012.. Vladimir Putin and the law. . Brookings Institute, Febr. 28. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/vladimir-putin-and-the-law/
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Pech L. 2022.. The rule of law as a well-established and well-defined principle of EU law. . Hague J. Rule Law 14::107–38
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  70. Pech L, Kochenov D. 2021.. Respect for the rule of law in the case law of the European Union: a casebook overview of the key judgments since the Portuguese judges case. Rep. , Swed. Inst. Eur. Policy Stud., Stockholm:. https://sieps.se/en/publications/2021/respect-for-the-rule-of-law-in-the-case-law-of-the-european-court-of-justice/
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Piccone T. 2023.. The compounding rule of law crisis. . Brookings Institution, Novemb. 10. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-compounding-rule-of-law-crisis/
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Pound R. 1910.. Law in books and law in action. . Am. Law Rev. 44::12–36
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Raz J. 1979.. The rule of law and its virtue. . In The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality, ed. J Raz , pp. 210–29. Oxford, UK:: Clarendon
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Raz J. 2019.. The law's own virtue. . Oxford J. Legal Stud. 391::1–15
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  75. Roznai Y. 2023.. We the limited people? On the people as a constitutional organ in constitutional amendments. . Supreme Court Law Rev. 2d 110::103–31
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Rundle K. 2023.. Revisiting the Rule of Law. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Scharfe P. 2015.. Erdoğan's presidential dreams, Turkey's constitutional politics. . Origins, Dec. http://origins.osu.edu/article/erdo-s-presidential-dreams-turkey-s-constitutional-politics
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Scheppele KL. 2005.. “ We forgot about the ditches”: Russian constitutional impatience and the challenge of terrorism. . Drake Law Rev. 53::963–1027
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Scheppele KL. 2013a.. Jack Balkin is an American. . Yale J. Law Hum. 25::23–42
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Scheppele KL. 2013b.. The rule of law and the Frankenstate: why governance checklists do not work. . Governance 26::559–62
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  81. Scheppele KL. 2018.. Autocratic legalism. . Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 85::545–83
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Scheppele KL. 2019.. Autocracy under cover of the transnational legal order. . In Constitution Making and the Transnational Legal Order, ed. G Shaffer, T Ginsburg, T Halliday , pp. 188–233. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Scheppele KL. 2024a.. Restoring democracy through international law. . Am. Univ. Int. Law Rev. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Scheppele KL. 2024b.. The rule of law writ large: the European Union and its rogue Member States. . In The Rule of Law Under Threat: A Transnational Challenge, ed. G Shaffer, W Sandholtz . Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press. In press
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Scheppele KL, Kochenov DV, Grabowska-Moroz B. 2020.. EU values are law, after all: enforcing EU values through systemic infringement actions by the European Commission and the Member States of the European Union. . Yearb. Eur. Law 39::3–121
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  86. Schiavone A. 2012 (2005).. The Invention of Law in the West. Cambridge, MA:: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Schmitt C. 2008 (1928).. Constitutional Theory, transl. J Selzer . New York:: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Schönteich M. 2013.. The rule of law movement: a review of its origins, evolution and ambitions. . In Promoting the Rule of Law: A Practitioner's Guide to Key Issues and Developments, ed. L Mooney , pp. 27–46. Chicago:: Am. Bar Assoc.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Shu-Chen W. 2007.. The Chinese legal tradition and the European view of the rule of law. . See Costa & Zolo 2007 , pp. 615–32
  90. Silkenat J, Libby G, eds. 2021.. Building the Rule of Law: First-Hand Accounts from a Thirty-Year Global Campaign. Chicago:: Am. Bar Assoc.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Stuntz WJ. 1995.. The substantive origins of criminal procedure. . Yale Law J. 105::393–447
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  92. Tamanaha B. 2004.. On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Tay AE-S. 2007.. “ Asian values” and the rule of law. . See Costa & Zolo 2007 , pp. 565–86
  94. UN Secr. Gen. 2004.. The rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies. Rep. S/2004/616 , UN Secr. Gen., New York:
     [Google Scholar]
  95. van Lochem P. 2017.. Legislation against the rule of law—an introduction. . Theory Pract. Legis. 5:(2):95–100
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  96. V-Dem Inst. 2023.. Democracy report 2022: Autocratization changing nature? Rep. , V-Dem Inst., Gothenburg, Swed:. https://v-dem.net/media/publications/dr_2022.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  97. von Jhering R. 1997 (1915).. The Struggle for Law, transl. JJ Lalor . Union, NJ:: Lawbook Exch.
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Waldron JJ. 2021.. The rule of law as an essentially contested concept. . See Meierhenrich & Loughlin 2021 , pp. 121–36
  99. Waldron JJ. 2023 (2016).. The rule of law. . In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. EN Zalta, U Nodelman . Stanford, CA:: Stanford Univ. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/rule-of-law/
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Walter BF. 2022.. How Civil Wars Start, and How to Stop Them. New York: Crown:
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Walters MD. 2020.. A.V. Dicey and the Common Law Constitutional Tradition: A Legal Turn of Mind. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Walters MD. 2021.. The spirit of legality: A.V. Dicey and the rule of law. . See Meierhenrich & Loughlin 2021 , pp. 153–70
  103. Weber M. 1946 (1919).. Politics as a vocation. . In From Max Weber, transl, ed. H Gerth, CW Mills , pp. 77–128. New York:: Free
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Weber M. 1978 (1921).. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, ed. G Roth, C Wittich . Berkeley:: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  105. White MJ. 2019.. How ius (right) became distinguished from lex (law): two early episodes in the story. . Hist. Political Thought 40::583–606
     [Google Scholar]
  106. World Justice Proj. 2023a.. The global rule of law recession continues. World Just. Proj., Washington, DC:. https://worldjusticeproject.org/rule-of-law-index/
    [Google Scholar]
  107. World Justice Proj. 2023b.. WJP rule of law index factors. World Just. Proj., Washington, DC:. https://worldjusticeproject.org/rule-of-law-index/factors/2023
    [Google Scholar]
  108. World Justice Proj. 2023c.. Rule of law index: 2023 insights. Rep. , World Just. Proj., Washington, DC:. https://worldjusticeproject.org/rule-of-law-index/downloads/WJPInsights2023.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-010924-103836
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error