Empirical Approaches to the Rule of Law: Contours and Challenges of a Social Science That Does Not Quite Yet Exist

Literature Cited

1. Abel R. 1973.. Law books and books about law. . Stanford Law Rev. 26::175–228
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
2. Abel R. 1980.. Redirecting social studies of law. . Law Soc. Rev. 14::805–29
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
3. Albiston CR, Sandefur RL. 2013.. Expanding the empirical study of access to justice. . Wis. Law Rev. 2013::101–20
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bahnsali L, Biebesheimer C. 2006.. Measuring the impact of criminal justice reform. . In Promoting the Rule of Law Abroad: In Search of Knowledge, ed. T Carothers , pp. 301–23. Washington, DC:: Carnegie Endow. Int. Peace
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bedner A. 2018.. The promise of a thick view. . In Handbook on the Rule of Law, ed. C May, A Winchester , pp. 34–47. Cheltenham, UK:: Edward Elgar Publ.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Black D. 1973.. The boundaries of legal sociology. . In The Social Organization of Law, ed. D Black, M Mileski , pp. 41–56. New York:: Seminar
   [Google Scholar]
7. Blokker P. 2013.. New Democracies in Crisis? A Comparative Constitutional Study of the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Slovakia. London/New York:: Routledge
   [Google Scholar]
8. Blokker P. 2016.. EU democratic oversight and domestic deviation from the rule of law: sociological reflections. . In Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union, ed. C Closa, D Kochenov , pp. 249–69. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
   [Google Scholar]
9. Blokker P. 2021.. The democracy and rule of law crises in the European Union and its Member States. Rep. , Eur. Comm., Leuven, Belg:. https://reconnect-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/D14.1.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
10. Botero JC, Nelson RL, Pratt C. 2011.. Indices and indicators of justice, governance, and the rule of law: an overview. . Hague J. Rule Law 3::153–69
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
11. Buyse A, Fortin K, McGonigle Leyh B, Fraser J. 2021.. The rule of law from below—a concept under development. . Utrecht Law Rev. 17::1–7
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
12. Carothers T. 2006a.. The problem of knowledge. . In Promoting the Rule of Law Abroad: In Search of Knowledge, ed. T Carothers , pp. 15–28. Washington, DC:: Carnegie Endow. Int. Peace
    [Google Scholar]
13. Carothers T. 2006b.. Preface. . In Promoting the Rule of Law Abroad: In Search of Knowledge, ed. T Carothers , pp. iv–xiv. Washington, DC:: Carnegie Endow. Int. Peace
    [Google Scholar]
14. Cheesman N. 2018.. Rule-of-law ethnography. . Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 14::167–84
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
15. Cotterrell R. 1992.. The Sociology of Law: An Introduction. London:: Butterworths. , 2nd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
16. Dunn H. 2021.. Emergent hybrid legality: a study of legal encounters in the DRC. . J. Interv. Statebuilding 15::201–20
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
17. Ehrlich E. 1936.. The Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. Cambridge, MA:: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
18. EPRS (Eur. Parliam. Res. Serv.). 2017.. Rule of law: selected publications. Doc. PE 599.339, EPRS, Brussels . https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/OTH/2017/599339/EPRS_DIV(2017)599339_EN.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
19. Feeley M. 1976.. The concept of laws in social science: a critique and notes on an expanded view. . Law Soc. Rev. 10::497–523
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
20. Fekete B, Robert P. 2018.. Understanding Hungarian attitudes toward law in an international context. Work. Pap. , Hung. Acad. Sci., Budapest:. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3120933
    [Google Scholar]
21. Gajduschek G. 2019.. Wild East and civilised West? Some indicators of legal culture in Hungary, Serbia and the Netherlands. An empirical comparative assessment. . Jahrb. Ostr. 2::165–84
    [Google Scholar]
22. Galanter M. 1974.. Why the haves come out ahead: speculations on the limits of legal change. . Law Soc. Rev. 9::95–160
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
23. Galligan D, Kurkchiyan M. 2013.. Preface. . In Law and Informal Practices: The Post-Communist Experience, ed. D Galligan, M Kurkchiyan , pp. vii–ix. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
24. Gibson JL. 2013.. Russian attitudes towards the rule of law: an analysis of survey data. . In Law and Informal Practices: The Post-Communist Experience, ed. D Galligan, M Kurkchiyan , pp. 77–91. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
25. Gibson JL, Caldeira GA. 1996.. The legal cultures of Europe. . Law Soc. Rev. 30::55–85
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
26. Gibson JL, Sonis J, Hean S. 2010.. Cambodians’ support for the rule of law on the eve of the Khmer Rouge trials. . Int. J. Transit. Justice 4::377–96
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
27. Ginsburg T. 2018.. Democratic backsliding and the rule of law. . Ohio Northern Univ. Law Rev. 44::351–69
    [Google Scholar]
28. Ginsburg T, Versteeg M. 2021.. Rule of law measurement. . In The Cambridge Companion to the Rule of Law, ed. J Meierhenrich, M Loughlin , pp. 494–512. Cambridge Companions Law . Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
29. Gowder P. 2016.. The Rule of Law in the Real World. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
30. Gowder P. 2020.. The dangers to the American rule of law will outlast the next election. . Cardozo Law Rev. De Novo 2020::126–64
    [Google Scholar]
31. Gowder P. 2021.. The Rule of Law in the United States: An Unfinished Project of Black Liberation. Oxford, UK:: Bloomsbury Acad.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Graaf N. 2023.. Dutch rule of law alert. . Verfassungsblog, Novemb. 28. https://verfassungsblog.de/dutch-rule-of-law-alert/
    [Google Scholar]
33. Grødeland Å, Miller W. 2015.. European Legal Cultures in Transition. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
34. Hertogh M. 2004a.. A ‘European’ conception of legal consciousness: rediscovering Eugen Ehrlich. . J. Law Soc. 31::457–81
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
35. Hertogh M. 2004b.. The living Rechtsstaat: a bottom-up approach to legal ideals and social reality. . In The Importance of Ideals: Debating Their Relevance in Law, Morality, and Politics, ed. W van der Burg, S Taekema , pp. 75–95. Brussels:: P.I.E.–Peter Lang
    [Google Scholar]
36. Hertogh M, ed. 2009.. Living Law: Reconsidering Eugen Ehrlich. Oxford, UK:: Hart Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Hertogh M. 2013.. A sociology of the rule of law: Why, what, where? And who cares?. Recht Werkelijkh. 34::42–46
    [Google Scholar]
38. Hertogh M. 2016.. Your rule of law is not mine: rethinking empirical approaches to EU rule of law promotion. . Asia Europe J. 14::43–59
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
39. Hertogh M. 2018.. Nobody's Law: Legal Consciousness and Legal Alienation in Everyday Life. London:: Palgrave MacMillan
    [Google Scholar]
40. Hertogh M, Jackson E. 2024.. The EU rule of law crisis from an empirical perspective: exploring the contours of a social science that does not yet exist. . In Interdisciplinary Research Methods in EU Law: A Handbook, ed. R Deplano, G Gentile, L Lonardo, T Nowak , pp. 174–95. Cheltenham, UK:: Edward Elgar Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Hertogh M, Kurkchiyan M. 2016.. “ When politics comes into play, law is no longer law”: images of collective legal consciousness in the UK, Poland and Bulgaria. . Int. J. Law Context 12::404–19
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
42. Holzer E. 2013.. What happens to law in a refugee camp?. Law Soc. Rev. 47::837–72
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
43. Horák F, Lacko D. 2023.. Triangulation of theoretical and empirical conceptualizations related to the rule of law. . Hague J. Rule Law 15::191–216
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
44. Horák F, Lacko D, Klocek A. 2021.. Legal consciousness: a systematic review of its conceptualization and measurement methods. . Anu. Psicol. Jurid. 31::9–34
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
45. Jakab A, Gajduschek G. 2019.. The rule of law, legal consciousness and compliance. . In Hungarian Social Report 2019, ed. IG Tóth , pp. 277–94, Budapest:: TÁRKI Soc. Res. Inst.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Jakab A, Kirchmair L. 2021.. How to develop the EU Justice Scoreboard into a rule of law index: using an existing tool in the EU rule of law crisis in a more efficient way. . Ger. Law J. 22::936–55
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
47. Jakab A, Kirchmair L. 2024.. The rule of law in numbers: how to use indices to measure adherence by the Member States and the EU itself. . In Upholding the Rule of Law in the EU, ed. J Wouters, P Bárd, D Kochenov, L Pech . Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press. Forthcoming
    [Google Scholar]
48. Jensen EG, Heller TC, eds. 2003.. Beyond Common Knowledge: Empirical Approaches to the Rule of Law. Stanford, CA:: Stanford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
49. JUSTICE. 2023.. The state we're in: addressing threats & challenges to the rule of law. Rep. , JUSTICE, London:. https://files.justice.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/31123029/JUSTICE-The-State-Were-In-Addressing-Threats-Challenges-to-the-Rule-of-Law-September-2023.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
50. Khaitan T. 2022.. On scholactivism in constitutional studies: skeptical thoughts. . Int. J. Const. Law 20::547–56
    [Google Scholar]
51. Kocher E, Bucholc M, Boulanger C. 2022.. Socio-legal perspectives on the rule of law: introduction to the issue focus. . Z. Rechtssoziol. 42::1–4
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
52. Koncewicz T. 2016.. Of institutions, democracy, constitutional self-defence. . Common Market Law Rev. 53::1753–92
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
53. Krygier M. 2001.. Transitional questions about the rule of law: Why, what, and how?. East Cent. Eur. 28::1–34
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
54. Krygier M. 2009.. The rule of law: legality, teleology, sociology. . In Relocating the Rule of Law, ed. G Palombella, N Walker , pp. 45–69. Oxford, UK:: Hart Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Krygier M. 2016.. The rule of law: pasts, presents, and two possible futures. . Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 12::199–229
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
56. Massoud M. 2013.. Law's Fragile State: Colonial, Authoritarian, and Humanitarian Legacies in Sudan. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
57. Massoud MF. 2016.. Ideals and practices in the rule of law: an essay on legal politics. . Law Soc. Inq. 41::489–501
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
58. McConnachie K. 2014.. Governing Refugees: Justice, Order and Legal Pluralism. Abingdon, UK:: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
59. McConnachie K. 2020.. Everyday justice in Karen refugee camps. . In Everyday Justice in Myanmar: Informal Resolutions and State Evasion in a Time of Contested Transition, ed. HM Kyed , pp. 284–95. Copenhagen:: NIAS Press
    [Google Scholar]
60. Merdzanovic A, Nicolaidis K. 2021.. Advocacy for a citizen-centric rule of law agenda: How do we bring the rule of law to life?. Eur. Law J. 27::297–305
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
61. Merry SE, Wood S. 2015.. Quantification and the paradox of measurement: translating children's rights in Tanzania. . Curr. Anthropol. 56::205–29
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
62. Nicolaidis K, Kleinfeld R. 2012.. Rethinking Europe's ‘rule of law’ and enlargement agenda: the fundamental dilemma. SIGMA Pap. 49 , OECD Publ., Paris:. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/rethinking-europe-s-rule-of-law-and-enlargement-agenda_5k4c42jmn5zp-en
    [Google Scholar]
63. Noelle-Neumann E. 1995.. Rechtsbewußtsein im wiedervereinigten Deutschland. . Z. Rechtssoziol. 16::121–55
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
64. Peerenboom R. 2002.. Let one hundred flowers bloom, one hundred schools contend: debating rule of law in China. . Mich. J. Int. Law 23::471–544
    [Google Scholar]
65. Polzer T. 2007.. Adapting to changing legal frameworks: Mozambican refugees in South Africa. . Int. J. Refug. Law 19::22–50
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
66. Pound R. 1910.. Law in books and law in action. . Am. Law Rev. 44::12–36
    [Google Scholar]
67. Rhode DL. 2004.. Access to Justice. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
68. Sadurski W. 2019.. Poland's Constitutional Breakdown. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
69. Sandefur RL. 2021.. Access to justice. . In Research Handbook on Modern Legal Realism, ed. S Talesh, E Mertz, H Klug , pp. 324–35. Cheltenham, UK:: Edward Elgar Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Sarat A. 1977.. Studying American legal culture: an assessment of survey evidence. . Law Soc. Rev. 11::427–88
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
71. Scheppele KL. 2015.. Understanding Hungary's constitutional revolution. . In Constitutional Crisis in the European Constitutional Area: Theory, Law and Politics in Hungary and Romania, ed. A von Bogdandy, P Sonnevend , pp. 124–37. Oxford, UK:: Hart Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Selznick P. 1968.. The sociology of law. . In The International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 9, ed. DL Sillis, RK Merton , 5059. New York:: Macmillan
    [Google Scholar]
73. Skąpska G, Radomska E, Wróbel M. 2023.. The inconsistent, everyday legal consciousness of contemporary poles. . Pol. Sociol. Rev. 223::289–318
    [Google Scholar]
74. Soltan KE. 2002.. Selznick and civics. . In Legality and Community: On the Intellectual Legacy of Philip Selznick, ed. RA Kagan, M Krygier, K Winston , pp. 357–72. Lanham, MD:: Rowman and Littlefield
    [Google Scholar]
75. Szente Z. 2017.. Challenging the basic values—the problems with the rule of law in Hungary and the EU's failure to tackle them. . In The Enforcement of EU Law and Values, ed. A Jakab, D Kochenov , pp. 456–75. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
76. Szilágyi IH, Kelemen L, Hall SG. 2021.. Changing Legal and Civic Culture in an Illiberal Democracy: A Social Psychological Survey of the Hungarian Legal System. London/New York:: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
77. Taekema S. 2021.. Methodologies of rule of law research: why legal philosophy needs empirical and doctrinal scholarship. . Law Philos. 40::33–66
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
78. Tamanaha BZ. 2004.. On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
79. Venice Comm. 2016.. Rule of law checklist. Publ. , Venice Comm., Counc. Eur., Strasbourg, Fr.: https://www.venice.coe.int/images/SITE%20IMAGES/Publications/Rule_of_Law_Check_List.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
80. Verfassungsblog. 2022.. Debate #Scholactivism (blog symposium in response to Tarunabh Khaitan). . Verfassungsblog, Sept. 6. https://verfassungsblog.de/category/debates/scholactivism-debates/
    [Google Scholar]
81. Versteeg M, Ginsburg T. 2017.. Measuring the rule of law: a comparison of indicators. . Law Soc. Inq. 42::100–37
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
82. Vucovíc D, Cvejic S. 2019.. Attitudes to the rule of law in contemporary Serbia: A coherent legal culture?. Jahrb. Ostr. 2::203–20
    [Google Scholar]
83. Waldron J. 2002.. Is the rule of law an essentially contested concept (in Florida)?. Law Philos. 21::137–64
    [Google Scholar]
84. Wilking JR, Love GJ. 2020.. Why the rule of law? Experimental evidence from China. . Justice Syst. J. 41::360–78
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
85. WJP (World Justice Proj.). 2023.. Rule of Law Index 2023. Publ., WJP, Washington, DC . https://worldjusticeproject.org/rule-of-law-index/downloads/WJPIndex2023.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
86. Yanow D. 2009.. Ways of knowing: passionate humility and reflective practice in research and management. . Am. Rev. Public Adm. 39::579–601
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
87. Zürn M, Nollkaemper A, Peerenboom R, eds. 2012.. Rule of Law Dynamics: In an Era of International and Transnational Governance. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]