1932

Abstract

With respect to African Americans, the history of racial discrimination in the imposition of the death penalty is well-known, and the persistence of racial disparities in the modern era of capital punishment is well-documented. In contrast, the influence of Latino ethnicity on the imposition of the death penalty has been studied very little. A review of the limited literature reveals evidence of discrimination against Latinos. Archival studies generally find ethnicity-of-victim discrimination, and some of those studies find ethnicity-of-defendant discrimination disadvantaging Latino defendants; these findings parallel the findings of the much more robust literature investigating bias against African American defendants and victims. The controlled experimental studies generally show both ethnicity-of-defendant and ethnicity-of-victim discrimination disadvantaging Latinos. Related literature investigating stereotypes, animosity, and discrimination in other criminal justice decisions further suggests the likelihood of ethnicity discrimination in the imposition of capital punishment, as well as the need for further research.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-042220-111211
2020-10-13
2024-06-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lawsocsci/16/1/annurev-lawsocsci-042220-111211.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-042220-111211&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Blair IV, Havranek EP, Price DW, Hanratty R, Fairclough DL et al. 2013. Assessment of biases against Latinxs and African Americans among primary care providers and community members. Am. J. Public Health 103:92–98
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Buck v. Davis 580 U.S.__ 2017.
  3. Carrigan WD, Webb C. 2003. The lynching of persons of Mexican origin or descent in the United States, 1848 to 1928. J. Soc. Hist. 37:411–38
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Charles KK, Guryan JE. 2011. Studying discrimination: fundamental challenges and recent progress. Annu. Rev. Econ. 4:479–511
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dep. Justice 2001. The federal death penalty system: supplementary data, analysis and revised protocols for capital case review Doc., Dep. Justice Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Devine PG, Forscher PS, Austin AJ, Cox WTL 2012. Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: a prejudice habit-breaking intervention. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 48:1267–78
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dovidio JF, Gluszek A, John M-S, Ditlmann R, Lagunes P 2010. Understanding bias toward Latinos: discrimination, dimensions of difference, and experience of exclusion. J. Soc. Issues 66:59–78
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Espinoza RKE. 2009. Juror bias and the death penalty: deleterious effects of ethnicity, SES and case circumstances. Am. Assoc. Behav. Soc. Sci. 2009:33–42
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Espinoza RKE, Willis-Esqueda C. 2008. Defendant and defense attorney characteristics and their effects on juror decision making and prejudice against Mexican Americans. Cult. Divers. Ethn. Minor. Psychol. 14:364–71
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Espinoza RKE, Willis-Esqueda C. 2015. The influence of mitigation evidence, ethnicity, and SES on death penalty decisions by European American and Latino venire persons. Cult. Divers. Ethn. Minor. Psychol. 21:288–99
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Flowers v. Mississippi 588 U.S.__ 2019.
  12. Furman v. Georgia 408 U.S. 238, 210 1972.
  13. Garcia R. 1994. Latinos and criminal justice. Chicano-Lat. Law Rev. 14:6–19
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Garza CF, Gasquoie PG. 2012. Implicit race/ethnic prejudice in Mexican Americans. Hisp. J. Behav. Sci. 35:121–33
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Goncalves WI. 2020. Narrative, culture, and individuation: a criminal defense lawyer's race-conscious approach to reduce implicit bias for Latinxs. Seattle J. Soc. Just. 17:15
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gregg v. Georgia 428 U.S. 153 1976.
  17. Grosso CM, Fagan J, Laurence M, Baldus D, Woodworth G, Newell R 2019. Death by stereotype: race, ethnicity, and California's failure to implement Furman's narrowing requirement. UCLA Law Rev 66:1394–43
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Grosso CM, O'Brien B, Taylor A, Woodworth G 2014. Race discrimination and the death penalty: an empirical and legal overview. America's Experiment with Capital Punishment: Reflections on the Past, Present, and Future of the Ultimate Penal Sanction J Acker, RM Bohm, CS Lanier pp52577 Durham, NC: Carolina Acad. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hunt JS. 2015. Race, ethnicity, and culture in jury decision making. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 11:269–88
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Johnson SL. 2016. A legal obituary for Ramiro. Univ. Mich. J. Law Reform 50:291–38
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Johnson SL. 2017. Buck v. Davis from the left. Ohio State J. Crim. Law 15:247–70
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Johnson SL, Blume JH, Hritz AC, Royer CE 2019. Race, intellectual disability, and death: an empirical inquiry into invidious influences on Atkins determinations. UCLA Law Rev 66:150631
    [Google Scholar]
  23. King RD, Light MT. 2019. Have racial and ethnic disparities in sentencing declined. Crime J 48:365–437
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kramer J, Ulmer J, Zajac G 2017. Capital punishment decisions in Pennsylvania 2000–2010: implications for racial, ethnic, and other disparate impacts Rep., Pa. Interbranch Comm. Gend. Racial Ethn. Fairness Pittsburgh, PA:
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee C. 2007. Hispanics and the death penalty: discriminatory charging practices in San Joaquin County, California. J. Crim. Just. 35:117–27
    [Google Scholar]
  26. McCleskey v. Kemp 481 U.S. 279 1987.
  27. Minero LP, Espinoza RKE. 2016. The influence of defendant immigration status, country of origin, and ethnicity on juror decisions: an aversive racism explanation for juror bias. Hisp. J. Behav. Sci. 38:55–74
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Murphy EL. 1984. Application of the death penalty in Cook County. Ill. Bar J. 73:90–95
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Mustard DB. 2001. Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in sentencing: evidence from the U.S. federal courts. J. Law Econ. 44:285–314
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Nejdl CS. 2018. Race, poverty, and bail: an annotated bibliography. North. Ill. Univ. Law Rev. 38:487–503
    [Google Scholar]
  31. O'Brien B, Grosso C, Possley M, Stephens K 2019. Latinx defendants, false convictions, and the difficult road to exoneration. UCLA Law Rev 66:1682–716
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Perez M. 2018. Los lazos viven: California's death row and systematic Latino lynching. Whittier Law Rev 37:377–400
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Phillips S. 2008. Racial disparities in the capital of capital punishment. Houst. Law Rev. 45:807–40
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Phillips S. 2012. Continued racial disparities in the capital of capital punishment: the Rosenthal era. Houst. Law Rev. 50:131–56
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Pierce GL, Radelet ML. 2005. The impact of legally inappropriate factors on death sentencing for California homicides, 1990–1999. Santa Clara Law Rev 46:1–47
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Rogers B. 2016. Harris County stands out for death penalty cases, study finds. Houston Chronicle Aug. 26. https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/article/Harris-County-stands-out-for-death-penalty-cases-9187154.php
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Thomson E. 1997. Discrimination and the death penalty in Arizona. Crim. Just. Rev. 22:65–76
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Urbina MG. 2004. A qualitative analysis of Latinos executed in the United States between 1975 and 1995: Who were they?. Soc. Justice 31:242–67
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Urbina MG, Peña IA. 2019. Capital punishment, Latinos, and the United States legal system: doing justice or an illusion of justice, legitimated oppression, and reinforcement of structural hierarchies. UCLA Law Rev 66:1762–817
    [Google Scholar]
  40. US Gov. Account. Off 1990. Death penalty sentencing: Research indicates pattern of racial disparities Rep., US Gov. Account. Off Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Weyant JE. 2005. Implicit stereotyping of Hispanics: development and validity of a Hispanic version of the Implicit Association Test. Hisp. J. Behav. Sci. 27:355–63
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-042220-111211
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error