1932

Abstract

Populism is Janus-faced. There is not a single form of populism but rather a variety of different forms, each with profoundly different political consequences. Despite the current hegemony of authoritarian populism, a much different sort of populism is also possible: democratic and antiestablishment populism, which combines elements of liberal and democratic convictions. When we examine the relationship between populism and constitutional democracy, populism should not be considered in isolation from its host ideology. Examples of democratic, liberal, socially inclusive forms of populism quite clearly show that authoritarianism and anti-pluralism are not necessarily the key elements of populism. However, the paucity of democratic populism also suggests that we have to look at factors other than ideology to understand why nativist and authoritarian populism currently dominates the political scene. Without understanding the political economy of the populist revolt, it is difficult to understand the true roots of populism and, consequently, to devise an appropriate democratic alternative to authoritarian populism. The ascendancy of right-wing nationalist populism today is a symptom of the failure of progressive politics.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042927
2019-10-13
2024-06-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lawsocsci/15/1/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042927.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042927&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Ackerman B. 1991. We the People: Foundations Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ackerman B. 2019. Revolutionary Constitutions: Charismatic Leadership and the Rule of Law Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Adler D. 2019. Meet Europe's left nationalists. The Nation Jan. 10. https://www.thenation.com/article/meet-europes-left-nationalists/
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Aglietta M. 2012. The European vortex. New Left Rev 75:May–June15–36
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Allred N, Hawkins KA, Ruth SP 2015. The impact of populism on democracy Presented at ALACIP Annual Congress, Lima Peru:
    [Google Scholar]
  6. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bankuti M, Halmai G, Scheppele KL 2012. Hungary's illiberal turn: disabling the constitution. J. Democr. 23:3138–46
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Beckfield J. 2019. Unequal Europe: Regional Integration and the Rise of European Inequality Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Benedetto G, Hix S, Mastrorocco N 2019. The rise and fall of social democracy, 1918–2017 Work. pap London School Econ London, UK:
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Beppler-Spahl S. 2019. The German left's populist experiment. Spiked March 12. https://www.spiked-online.com/2019/03/12/the-german-lefts-populist-experiment/
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Berman S. 2018. Politics, pessimism, and populism. Social Europe Oct. 10. https://www.socialeurope.eu/politics-pessimism-and-populism
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Blokker P. 2019. Varieties of populist constitutionalism: the transnational dimension. Ger. Law J. 20:3332–50
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Blyth M. 2016. Global Trumpism: why Trump's victory was 30 years in the making and why it won't stop here. Foreign Affairs Nov. 15. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2016-11-15/global-trumpism
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bonikowski B. 2017. Ethno-nationalist populism and the mobilization of collective resentment. Br. J. Sociol. 68:S1181–213
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bonikowski B, Gidron N. 2016. The populist style in American politics: presidential campaign rhetoric, 1952–1996. Soc. Forces 94:41593–621
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Broz JL, Frieden J, Weymouth S 2019. Populism in place: the economic geography of the globalization backlash. Int. Organ. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Brubaker R. 2017. Between nationalism and civilizationalism: the European populist moment in comparative perspective. Ethnic Racial Stud 40:81191–226
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bugaric B. 2019. The two faces of populism: between authoritarian and democratic populism. Ger. Law J. 20:3390–400
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Canovan M. 1981. Populism London: Junction Books
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Canovan M. 1999. Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Stud 47:2–16
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Collier D, Levitsky S. 1997. Democracy with adjectives: conceptual innovation in comparative research. World Politics 49:430–51
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Corrales J. 2015. Autocratic legalism in Venezuela. J. Democr. 26:237–51
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Corso L. 2014. What does populism have to do with constitutional law? Discussing populist constitutionalism and its assumptions. Riv. Filos. Dirrito 3:2443–70
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Dawson M. 2018. New governance and the displacement of Social Europe: the case of the European Semester. Eur. Const. Law Rev. 14:1191–209
    [Google Scholar]
  25. D'Eramo M. 2017. They, the people. New Left Rev 103:129–38
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Dinan D, Nugent N, Paterson W 2017. The European Union in Crisis London: Palgrave
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Dix RH. 1985. Populism: authoritarian and democratic. Lat. Am. Res. Rev. 20:229–52
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Dobson JW. 2012. The Dictator's Learning Curve: Inside the Global Battle for Democracy London: Harvill Secker
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Eichengreen B. 2018. The Populist Temptation: Economic Grievance and Political Reaction in the Modern Era Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ekiert G. 2017. How to deal with Poland and Hungary. Soc. Europe Occas. Pap. 13:1–13
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Fishkin J, Forbath WE. 2014. The anti-oligarchy constitution. Boston Univ. Law Rev. 94:3669–96
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Foa RS, Ekiert G. 2017. The weakness of postcommunist civil society reassesed. Eur. J. Political Res. 56:2419–39
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Fontana D. 2018. Unbundling populism. UCLA Law Rev 65:1482–505
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Frank T. 2018. Forget Trump—populism is the cure, not disease. The Guardian May 23. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/may/23/thomas-frank-trump-populism-books
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Freedom House 2017. Nations in transit 2017: the false promise of populism Rep., Freedom House New York:
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Freedom House 2018. Nations in transit 2018: confronting illiberalism Rep., Freedom House New York:
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Frieden J, Walter S. 2017. Understanding the political economy of the Eurozone crisis. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 20:371–90
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Galston W. 2018. Anti-Pluralism: The Populist Threat to Liberal Democracy New Haven, CT/London: Yale Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Gidron N, Bonikowski B. 2013. Varieties of populism: literature review and research agenda Work. Pap. 13-0004, Weatherhead Cent Int. Aff., Harvard Univ Cambridge, MA:
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Gidron N, Hall PA. 2017. The politics of social status: economic and cultural roots of the populist right. Br. J. Sociol. 68:S1S57–S84
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Ginsburg T, Huq AZ. 2018. How to Save a Constitutional Democracy Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Goldmann M. 2017. The great recurrence: Karl Polanyi and the crises of the European Union. Eur. Law J. 23:3–4272–89
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Goodwyn L. 1978. The Populist Moment: A Short History of the Agrarian Revolt in America Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Grzymala-Busse A. 2017. Global populisms and their impact. Slavic Rev 76:S1S3–S8
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Habermas J. 2018. “New” perspectives for Europe. Social Europe Oct. 22. https://www.socialeurope.eu/new-perspectives-for-europe
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Halmai G. 2017. Legally sophisticated authoritarians: the Hungarian Lex CEU. Verfassungsblog March 31. https://verfassungsblog.de/legally-sophisticated-authoritarians-the-hungarian-lex-ceu/
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Halmai G. 2018. Is there such a thing as “populist constitutionalism”? The case of Hungary. Fudan J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 11:3323–39
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Halmai G. 2019. Populism, authoritarianism, and constitutionalism. Ger. Law J. 20:3296–313
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Harcourt BE. 2019. Disambiguating populism. Critique & Praxis 13/13 May 22. http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/praxis1313/bernard-e-harcourt-disambiguating-populism/
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Hawkins KA, Kaltwasser CR. 2017. What the (ideational) study of populism can teach us, and what it can't. Swiss Political Sci. Rev. 23:4526–42
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Houle C, Kenny PD. 2018. The political and economic consequences of populist rule in Latin America. Gov. Oppos. 53:2256–87
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Howse R. 2019. Epilogue: in defense of disruptive democracy—a critique of anti-populism. Int. J. Const. Law 17:2641–60
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Huber RA, Schimpf C. 2017. On the distinct effects of left-wing and right-wing populism on democratic quality. Politics Gov 5:4146–65
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Huq AZ. 2018. The people against the constitution. Mich. Law Rev. 116:61123–44
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Ikenberry GJ. 2018. The end of liberal international order. Int. Aff. 94:17–23
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Ivaldi G, Lanzone ME, Woods D 2017. Varieties of populism across a left-right spectrum: the case of the Front National, the Northern League, Podemos and Five Star Movement. Swiss Political Sci. Rev. 23:4354–76
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Judis JB. 2016. The Populist Explosion: How the Great Recession Transformed American and European Politics New York: Columbia Glob. Rep.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Kaltwasser CR. 2013. Populism versus constitutionalism: comparative perspectives on contemporary Western Europe, Latin America, and the United States Policy Brief, Found. Law Justice Soc Oxford, UK:
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Kaltwasser CR. 2014. The response of populism to Dahl's democratic dilemmas. Political Stud 62:3470–87
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Kirchick J. 2017. The End of Europe: Dictators, Demagogues, and the Coming Dark Age New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Koncewicz TT. 2016. Constitutional capture in Poland 2016 and beyond: What is next?. Verfassungsblog Dec. 19. https://verfassungsblog.de/constitutional-capture-in-poland-2016-and-beyond-what-is-next/
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Kramer L. 2004. The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Kuttner R. 2018. Can Democracy Survive Global Capitalism? New York/London: W.W. Norton & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Landau D. 2015. Abusive constitutionalism. UC Davis Law Rev 47:189–260
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Levitsky S, Way LA. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Levitsky S, Ziblatt D. 2018. How Democracies Die New York: Crown
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Lewis P, Clarke S, Barr C, Holder J, Kommenda N 2018. Revealed: One in four Europeans vote populist. The Guardian Nov. 20. https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2018/nov/20/revealed-one-in-four-europeans-vote-populist
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Luce E. 2017. The Retreat of Western Liberalism London: Little, Brown
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Miller J. 2018. Can Democracy Work? A Short History of a Radical Idea from Ancient Athens to Our World London: One World
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Milner HV. 2019. Globalisation, populism and the decline of the welfare state. Survival 61:291–96
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Moffitt B. 2017. Liberal illiberalism? The reshaping of the contemporary populist radical right in Northern Europe. Politics Gov 5:4112–22
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Mouffe C. 2016. In defence of left-wing populism. The Conversation April 29. https://theconversation.com/in-defence-of-left-wing-populism-55869
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Mouffe C. 2018. For a Left Populism London/New York: Verso
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Mounk Y. 2018. The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger & How to Save It Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Moyn S, Priestland D. 2017. Trump isn't a threat to our democracy. Hysteria is. The New York Times Aug. 11. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/11/opinion/sunday/trump-hysteria-democracy-tyranny.html
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Mudde C. 2004. The populist zeitgeist. Gov. Oppos. 39:4541–63
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Mudde C. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Mudde C 2016. Europe's populist surge: a long time in the making. Foreign Aff 95:625–30
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Mudde C 2019. Can the US Democratic party revive the left in Europe?. The Guardian April 18. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/apr/18/us-democratic-party-revive-left-europe
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Mudde C, Kaltwasser CR. 2013. Populism. The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies M Freeden, LT Sargent, M Stears 493–512 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Mudde C, Kaltwasser CR. 2017. Populism: A Very Short Introduction Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Mudde C, Kaltwasser CR. 2018. Studying populism in comparative perspective: reflections on the contemporary and future research agenda. Comp. Political Stud. 51:1667–93
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Müller J-W. 2016. What Is Populism? Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Müller J-W. 2017. Populism and constitutionalism. The Oxford Handbook of Populism CR Kaltwasser, P Taggart, PO Espejo, P Ostiguy 590–606 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  85. [Google Scholar]
  86. Norris P, Inglehart R. 2019. Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit and the Rise of Authoritarian Populism New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Packer G. 2015. The populists. The New Yorker Aug. 30. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/09/07/the-populists
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Pappas TS. 2019. Populists in power. J. Democr. 30:270–84
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Parker R. 1994. Here, the People Rule: A Constitutional Manifesto Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Podemos 2015. 215: El Programa del Cambio Madrid, Spain: Podemos
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Podemos 2016. Podemos 26-J Madrid, Spain: Podemos
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Polanyi K. 2001. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time Boston: Beacon. 2nd ed.
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Rodrik D. 2018a. In defence of economic populism. Project Syndicate Jan. 18. https://www.socialeurope.eu/defense-economic-populism
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Rodrik D. 2018b. Populism and the economics of globalization. J. Int. Bus. Policy 1:12–33
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Rodrik D, Sabel C. 2019. Building a good jobs economy Work. Pap., Harvard Univ Cambridge, MA:
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Rummens S. 2017. Populism as a threat to liberal democracy. The Oxford Handbook of Populism CR Kaltwasser, P Taggart, PO Espejo, P Ostiguy 554–70 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Sadurski W. 2018. How democracy dies (in Poland): a case study of anti-constitutional populist backsliding Res. Pap. No. 18/01, Sydney Law School Sydney, Aust:.
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Sadurski W. 2019. Poland's Constitutional Breakdown Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Sandel M. 2018. Populism, liberalism, and democracy. Philos. Soc. Critic. 44:4353–59
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Schmidt V. 2016. Missing topic in #EUref: neo-liberalism gone too far. Social Europe June 22. https://www.socialeurope.eu/missing-topic-euref-neo-liberalism-gone-far
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Schmidt V. 2017. How do progressives fight back against populism?. Social Europe April 4. https://www.socialeurope.eu/progressives-fight-back-populism
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Stavrakakis Y, Katsambekis G. 2014. Left-wing populism in the European periphery: the case of SYRIZA. J. Political Ideol. 19:2119–42
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Steinmetz-Jenkins D. 2017. The logic of populism. Dissent 64:2186–89
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Taggart P. 2000. Populism Buckingham, UK: Open Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Tooze A. 2018. Balancing act. Dissent 65:4104–9
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Tushnet M. 1999. Taking the Constitution Away from the Court Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  107. Tushnet M. 2018. Comparing right-wing and left-wing populism. Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? MA Graber, S Levinson, M Tushnet 639–50 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Tushnet M. 2019. Varieties of populism. Ger. Law J. 20:3382–89
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Varol OO. 2015. Stealth authoritarianism. Iowa Law Rev 100:1673–742
    [Google Scholar]
  110. Weyland K. 2013. Latin America's authoritarian drift: the threat from the populist left. J. Democr. 24:318–32
    [Google Scholar]
  111. Zalan E. 2018. Germany raises concerns over Hungary's “Stop Soros” bills. EU Observer Feb. 16. https://euobserver.com/political/141004
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Zielonka J. 2018. Counter-Revolution: Liberal Europe in Retreat Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042927
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error