1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Law and Social Science
  4. Volume 13, 2017
  5. Article

Annual Review of Law and Social Science

Volume 13, 2017

The Sociology of Constitutions

Abstract

This article sets out an account of the historical development and the contemporary elaboration of sociological approaches to constitutional law. It argues that recent years have seen a broad sociological turn in constitutional theory, such that sociological constitutionalism now forms a distinct field of legal research. This is due to the general increase in the importance of constitutionalism in different national societies across the globe. This is also due to the emergence of new patterns of constitutional formation, both within and beyond national societies, resulting from the interaction between national and domestic constitutional law. The article separates different constitutional-sociological approaches into two categories: those with a primarily national, and those with a primarily transnational focus. Overall, however, it claims that sociological constitutionalism is driven primarily by engagement with transnational law, and the main insights in this field relate, in different ways, to global processes of transnational norm formation.

Keyword(s): globalization, integration, legitimacy, private law, public law, transnational law
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113518
2017-10-13
2025-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lawsocsci/13/1/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113518.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113518&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Almeida F. 2014. The emergence of constitutionalism as an evolutionary biocultural adaptation. Cardozo Public Law Policy Ethics J 13:11–96 [Google Scholar]
  2. Blokker P. 2013. New Democracies in Crisis? A Comparative Constitutional Study of the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Slovakia Abingdon, UK: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  3. Blokker P. 2017. Politics and the political in sociological constitutionalism. See Blokker & Thornhill 2017 178–208
  4. Blokker P, Thornhill C. 2017. Sociological Constitutionalism Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  5. Brunkhorst H. 2002. Solidarität: Von der Bürgerfreundschaft zur globalen Rechtsgenossenschaft Frankfurt am Main, Ger.: Suhrkamp [Google Scholar]
  6. Brunkhorst H. 2014. Critical Theory of Legal Revolutions—Evolutionary Perspectives London/New York: Continuum [Google Scholar]
  7. Chernilo D. 2014. Concepciones de sociologia en la sociologia constitucional contemporanea. Econ. Politica 1:2101–29 [Google Scholar]
  8. Commaille J, Dumoulin L. 2009. Heurs et malheurs de la légalité dans les sociétés contemporaines: une sociologie politique de la judiciarisation. L'année Sociol 59:163–107 [Google Scholar]
  9. Corsi G. 2016. On paradoxes in constitutions. Sociology of Constitutions: A Paradoxical Perspective A Febbrajo, G Corsi 11–29 Abingdon, UK: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  10. Dean M. 1999. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society London: Sage [Google Scholar]
  11. de Sousa Santos B. 2002. Toward a New Legal Common Sense Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dezalay Y, Garth BG. 2002. The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  13. Dezalay Y, Madsen MR. 2012. The force of law and lawyers: Pierre Bourdieu and the reflexive sociology of law. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 8:433–52 [Google Scholar]
  14. Durkheim E. 1950. Leçons de sociologie Paris: PUF [Google Scholar]
  15. Durkheim E. 1966. Montesquieu et Rousseau, précurseurs de la sociologie Paris: Lib. Marcel Rivière et Cie [Google Scholar]
  16. Ehrlich E. 1989 (1913). Grundlegung der soziologie des rechts Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 4th ed.. [Google Scholar]
  17. El-Ghobashy M. 2008. Constitutionalist contention in contemporary Egypt. Am. Behav. Sci. 51:1590–610 [Google Scholar]
  18. Fine R, Vázquez R. 2006. Freedom and subjectivity in modern society: re-reading Hegel's philosophy of right. Law and Sociology M Freeman 241–53 Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  19. Fischer-Lescano A. 2003. Die emergenz der globalverfassung. Z. Ausl. Öffentliches Recht Völkerrecht 63:717–60 [Google Scholar]
  20. Fischer-Lescano A, Teubner G. 2006. Regime-Kollisionen: Zur Fragmentierung des globalen Rechts Frankfurt am Main, Ger.: Suhrkamp [Google Scholar]
  21. Frerichs S. 2010. Constitutional ideal types in the global age: a sociological review. The Many Constitutions of Europe K Tuori, S Sankari 69–88 Farnham, UK: Ashgate [Google Scholar]
  22. Frerichs S. 2016. The law of market society: a sociology of international economic law and beyond. Finn. Yearb. Int. Law 23:173–237 [Google Scholar]
  23. Frerichs S. 2017. The rule of the market: economic constitutionalism understood sociologically. See Blokker & Thornhill 2017 241–64
  24. Friedman L. 1996. Borders: on the emerging sociology of transnational law. Stanford J. Int. Law 32:65–90 [Google Scholar]
  25. Goldoni M. 2016. I Limiti materiali e riflessivi della sociologia costituzionale. Quad. Cost. 2016:3539–62 [Google Scholar]
  26. Häberle P. 1975. Die offene Gesellschaft der Verfassungsinterpreten. Juristenzeitung 30:297–305 [Google Scholar]
  27. Habermas J. 1990 (1962). Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft Frankfurt am Main, Ger.: Suhrkamp. New ed. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hegel GWF. 1969 (1821). Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. Werke VII E Moldenhauer, KM Michel Frankfurt am Main, Ger.: Suhrkamp [Google Scholar]
  29. Hirsch M. 2015. Invitation to the Sociology of International Law Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  30. Hirschl R. 2004. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and the Consequences of the New Constitutionalism Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  31. Kjaer P. 2014. Constitutionalization in the Global Realm: A Sociological Approach Abingdon, UK: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  32. Klug H. 2000. Constituting Democracy: Law, Globalism and South Africa's Political Reconstruction Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  33. Lassalle F. 1892. Ueber Verfassungswesen Berlin: Verl. Exped. Vorwärts Berl. Volksbl. [Google Scholar]
  34. Layton AS. 2000. International Politics and Civil Rights in the United States, 1941–1960 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  35. Lemaitre Ropoll J, Sandvik KB. 2015. Shifting frames, vanishing resources, and dangerous political opportunities: legal mobilization among displaced women in Colombia. Law Soc. Rev. 49:15–38 [Google Scholar]
  36. Levakin IV. 2016. Evolution of the constitution and sociology of the Russian legal system. Law Mod. States 1:17–34 [Google Scholar]
  37. Luhmann N. 1965. Grundrechte als Institution: Ein Beitrag zur politischen Soziologie Berlin: Duncker und Humblot [Google Scholar]
  38. Luhmann N. 1990. Verfassung als evolutionäre Errungenschaft. Rechtshist. J. 9:176–220 [Google Scholar]
  39. Madsen MR. 2010. La genèse de l'Europe des droits de l'homme: enjeux juridiques et stratégies d'état (France, Grande-Bretagne et pays Scandinaves) Strasbourg: Presses Univ. Strasbourg [Google Scholar]
  40. Madsen MR. 2014. Sociological approaches to international courts. Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication C Romano, K Alter, Y Shany 388–412 Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  41. Meyer JW, Boli J, Thomas GM, Ramirez FO. 1997. World society and the nation-state. Am. J. Sociol. 103:1144–81 [Google Scholar]
  42. Milewicz K. 2008. Emerging patterns of global constitutionalization: toward a conceptual framework. Indiana J. Glob. Legal Stud. 16:2413–36 [Google Scholar]
  43. Morlok M. 2014. Soziologie der verfassung Munich, Ger.: Beck [Google Scholar]
  44. Münch R. 1984. Die Struktur der Moderne: Grundmuster und differentielle Gestaltung des institutionellen Aufbaus der modernen Gesellschaften Frankfurt am Main, Ger.: Suhrkamp [Google Scholar]
  45. Münch R. 2008. Constructing a European society by jurisdiction. Eur. Law J. 14:5519–41 [Google Scholar]
  46. Neves M. 1992. Verfassung und Positivität des Rechts in der peripheren Moderne: Eine theoretische Betrachtung und eine Interpretation des Falls Brasilien Berlin: Duncker und Humblot [Google Scholar]
  47. Neves M. 1998. Symbolische Konstitutionalisierung Berlin: Duncker und Humblot [Google Scholar]
  48. Neves M. 2017. From constitutionalism to transconstitutionalism: beyond constitutional nationalism, cosmopolitan constitutional unity and fragmentary constitutional pluralism. See Blokker & Thornhill 2017 265–312
  49. Parsons T. 1965. Full citizenship for the negro American? A sociological problem. Daedalus 94:41009–54 [Google Scholar]
  50. Peters A. 2014. Jenseits der Menschenrechte: Die Rechtsstellung des Individuums im Völkerrecht Tübingen, Ger.: Mohr [Google Scholar]
  51. Priban J. 2012. Constitutionalism as fear of the political? A comparative analysis of Teubner's Constitutional Fragments and Thornhill's A Sociology of Constitutions. J. Law Soc. 39:3441–71 [Google Scholar]
  52. Puchta GF. 1828. Das Gewohnheitsrecht Erlangen, Ger.: Palm [Google Scholar]
  53. Rodríguez Garavito C, Rodríguez Franco D. 2010. Cortes y cambio social—Cómo la Corte Constitucional transformó el desplazamiento forzado en Colombia Bogota: Dejusticia [Google Scholar]
  54. Scheppele KL. 2003. Constitutional negotiations: political contexts of judicial activism in post‐Soviet Europe. Int. Sociol. 18:1219–38 [Google Scholar]
  55. Scheppele KL. 2004. Constitutional ethnography: an introduction. Law Soc. Rev. 38:3389–406 [Google Scholar]
  56. Scheppele KL. 2017. The social lives of constitutions. See Blokker & Thornhill 2017 35–66
  57. Schmidt R. 2012. Verfassungskultur und Verfassungssoziologie: Politischer und rechtlicher Konstitutionalismus in Deutschland im 19. Jahrhundert Berlin: Springer [Google Scholar]
  58. Schmitt C. 1928. Verfassungslehre Berlin: Duncker und Humblot [Google Scholar]
  59. Schneiderman D. 2008. Constitutionalizing Economic Globalization: Investment Rules and Democracy's Promise Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  60. Scholz R. 1971. Die Koalitionsfreiheit als Verfassungsproblem Munich, Ger.: Beck [Google Scholar]
  61. Scholz R. 1978. Pressefreiheit und Arbeitsverfassung: Verfassungsprobleme um Tendenzschutz und innere Pressefreiheit Berlin: Duncker und Humblot [Google Scholar]
  62. Schwöbel CEJ. 2011. Global Constitutionalism in International Legal Perspective Leiden, Neth.: Nijhoff [Google Scholar]
  63. Sciulli D. 1986. Voluntaristic action as a distinct concept: theoretical foundations of societal constitutionalism. Am. Sociol. Rev. 51:6743–66 [Google Scholar]
  64. Sciulli D. 1991. Theory of Societal Constitutionalism: Foundations of a Non-Marxist Critical Theory Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  65. Sciulli D. 2010. Democracy, professions and societal constitutionalism. The Handbook of Politics: State and Society in Global Perspective KT Leicht, JC Jenkins 89–109 New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
  66. Smirnova M, Thornhill C. 2016. A sociological approach to the Russian constitution. Comp. Sociol. 15:6747–93 [Google Scholar]
  67. Stein E. 1981. Lawyers, judges and the making of a transnational constitution. Am. J. Int. Law 75:11–27 [Google Scholar]
  68. Stone Sweet A. 2004. The Judicial Construction of Europe Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  69. Teubner G. 1997. Global Bukowina: legal pluralism in the world society. Global Law Without a State G Teubner 3–28 Farnham, UK: Ashgate [Google Scholar]
  70. Teubner G. 2007. Globale Zivilverfassungen: Alternativen zur staatszentrierten Verfassungstheorie. Die staaten der weltgesellschaft: Niklas Luhmanns Staatsverständnis M Neves, R Voigt 117–47 Baden-Baden, Ger.: Nomos [Google Scholar]
  71. Teubner G. 2011. Verfassungen ohne Staat? Zur Konstitutionalisierung transnationaler Regimes. Recht ohne Staat: Zur Normativität nichtstaatlicher Rechtsetzung K Günther, S Kadelbach 49–100 Frankfurt: Campus [Google Scholar]
  72. Teubner G. 2012. Constitutional Fragments. Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  73. Teubner G. 2017. Societal constitutionalism: nine variations on a theme by David Sciulli. See Blokker & Thornhill 2017 313–40
  74. Thompson G. 2015. Review essay: Socializing the constitution?. Econ. Soc. 44:480–93 [Google Scholar]
  75. Thornhill C. 2011. A Sociology of Constitutions: Constitutions and State Legitimacy in Historical-Sociological Perspective Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  76. Thornhill C. 2012a. The dialectic of constituent power in contemporary constitutionalism. Glob. Const. 1:3369–404 [Google Scholar]
  77. Thornhill C. 2012b. National sovereignty and the constitution of transnational law: a sociological approach to a classical antinomy. Transnatl. Legal Theory 3:4394–460 [Google Scholar]
  78. Thornhill C. 2013. Idealism and the idea of the constitution. The Impact of Idealism: The Legacy of Post-Kantian German Thought II Historical, Social and Political Thought J Walker, E Disley, N Boyle 51–81 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  79. Thornhill C. 2016. A Sociology of Transnational Constitutions: Social Foundations of the Post-National Legal Structure Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  80. Tomkins A. 2003. Public Law Oxford: Clarendon [Google Scholar]
  81. Tuori K. 2015. European Constitutionalism Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  82. Vauchez A. 2008. The force of a weak field: law and lawyers in the government of the European Union (for a renewed research agenda). Int. Political Sociol. 2:128–44 [Google Scholar]
  83. Vauchez A. 2014. Judicialization: a sociohistorical perspective. Law and the Formation of Modern Europe: Perspectives from the Historical Sociology of Law MR Madsen, C Thornhill 96–116 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  84. Vorländer H. 1999. Verfassung und politische Kultur: Anmerkungen aus aktuellem Anlaß. Verfassung und politische Kultur J Gebhardt 75–84 Baden-Baden, Ger.: Nomos [Google Scholar]
  85. Vorländer H. 2002. Integration durch Verfassung? Die symbolische Bedeutung der Verfassung im politischen Integrationsprozess. Integration durch Verfassung H Vorländer 9–40 Wiesbaden, Ger.: Westdeutscher Verlag [Google Scholar]
  86. Vorländer H. 2017. Constitutions as symbolic orders—the cultural analysis of constitutionalism. See Blokker & Thornhill 2017 209–40
  87. Weber M. 1921. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundriß der verstehenden Soziologie J Winckelmann Tübingen, Ger.: J.C.B. Mohr [Google Scholar]
  88. Weber M. 1988. Deutschlands künftige Staatsform. Gesammelte politische Schriften448–83 Tübingen, Ger.: J.C.B. Mohr [Google Scholar]
  89. Weiler JHH. 1991. The transformation of Europe. Yale Law J 100:2404–83 [Google Scholar]
  90. Zumbansen P. 2002. Piercing the legal veil: commercial arbitration and transnational law. Eur. Law J. 8:3400–32 [Google Scholar]
  91. Zumbansen P. 2006. Transnational law. Encyclopedia of Comparative Law J Smits 738–54 Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar [Google Scholar]
  92. Zumbansen P. 2010. Transnational legal pluralism. Transnatl. Legal Theory 1:2141–89 [Google Scholar]
  93. Zumbansen P. 2012. Comparative, global and transnational constitutionalism: the emergence of a transnational legal-pluralist order. Glob. Const. 1:116–52 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113518
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error