1932

Abstract

This review article presents the current state of research on counterfactual expressions and contexts. It focuses on the relationship between formal semantic and typological approaches. This leads to a special emphasis on counterfactual expressions outside of conditional clauses and the role of counterfactual expressions in modal meanings such as weak necessity.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011724-121349
2025-02-03
2025-02-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/linguistics/11/1/annurev-linguistics-011724-121349.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011724-121349&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adams EW. 1970.. Subjunctive and indicative conditionals. . Found. Lang. 6:(1):8994
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Akatsuka N. 1992.. Japanese modals are conditionals. . In The Joy of Grammar: A Festschrift in Honor of James D. McCawley, ed. D Brentari, GN Larson, LA MacLeod , pp. 110. Amsterdam:: John Benjamins
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Allison S. 2017.. Conditional constructions in Makary Kotoko. . Stud. Afr. Linguist. 46::3349
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  4. Apavatcharut S. 1982.. L'expression des temps et des aspects verbaux en français et en thaï: étude contrastive. PhD Thesis , Univ. Sorbonne Nouv., Paris:
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Arregui A. 2021.. Counterfactuals: “if kangaroos had no tails.…”. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Semantics, ed. D Gutzmann, L Matthewson, C Meier, H Rullmann, E Zimmermann . Hoboken, NJ:: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118788516.sem007
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Asher N, McCready E. 2007.. Were, would, might and a compositional account of counterfactuals. . J. Semant. 24::93129
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  7. Au TKF. 1983.. Chinese and English counterfactuals: the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis revisited. . Cognition 15:(1–3):15587
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bossuyt T. 2023.. Concessive conditionals beyond Europe: a typological survey. . Stud. Lang. 47:(1):131
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chamorro P. 2012.. Future time reference and irrealis modality in Chamorro: a study of preverbal para. . In Building a Bridge Between Linguistic Communities of the Old and the New World, pp. 91113. Leiden, Neth:.: Brill
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Collins J, Hall N, Paul LA. 2004.. Causation and Counterfactuals. Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Comrie B. 1986.. Conditionals: a typology. . In On Conditionals, ed. E Traugott, A Meulen, C Ferguson, J Reilly , pp. 77100. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cowan MM. 1969.. Tzotzil Grammar. Norman, Okla.:: Summer Inst. Linguist. Univ. Okla.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dachkovsky S, Sandler W. 2009.. Visual intonation in the prosody of a sign language. . Lang. Speech 52:(2/3):287314
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dobrushina N. 2008.. Imperatives in conditional and concessive subordinate clauses. . In Subordination and Coordination Strategies in North Asian Languages, ed. EJ Vajda , pp. 12341. Amsterdam:: John Benjamins
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Edgington D. 2008.. I—The Presidential Address: counterfactuals. . Proc. Aristot. Soc. 108::121
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Fleischman S. 1989.. Temporal distance: a basic linguistic metaphor. . Stud. Lang. 13::150
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gaudefroy-Demombynes M, Blachère R. 1952.. Grammaire de l 'arabe classique. Paris:: G.P. Maisonneuve
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Guérin V. 2011.. A Grammar of : An Oceanic Language of Vanuatu. Honolulu:: Univ. Hawai`i Press
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Haiman J. 1980.. Hua: A Papuan Language of the Eastern Highlands of New Guinea. Amsterdam:: John Benjamins
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hale K. 1981.. Draft Lardil Dictionary. Canberra:: Aust. Inst. Aborig. Torres Strait Isl. Stud.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hewitt BG. 1995.. Georgian: A Structural Reference Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia:: John Benjamins
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Iatridou S. 2000.. The grammatical ingredients of counterfactuality. . Linguist. Inq. 31:(2):23170
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ippolito M. 2003.. Presuppositions and implicatures in counterfactuals. . Nat. Lang. Semant. 11:(2):14586
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  24. James D. 1982.. Past tense and the hypothetical: a crosslinguistic study. . Stud. Lang. 6::375403
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kahneman D, Miller DT. 1986.. Norm theory: comparing reality to its alternatives. . Psychol. Rev. 93:(2):13653
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  26. Klein W. 1994.. Time in Language. London/Berlin:: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Klein W. 2021.. Another way to look at counterfactuals. . Theor. Linguist. 47:(3–4):189226
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kouwenberg S. 1994.. A Grammar of Berbice Dutch Creole. Berlin:: De Gruyter Mouton
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kuteva T, Aarts B, Popova G, Abbi A. 2019.. The grammar of “non-realization. .” Stud. Lang. 43:(3):85095
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  30. la Roi E. 2022.. Interlocked life cycles of counterfactual mood forms from Archaic to Classical Greek: aspect, actionality and changing temporal reference. . Indoger. Forsch. 127:(1):23582
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  31. Labatut R. 1976.. La phrase peule et ses transformations. Lille, Fr:.: Atelier Natl. Reprod. Theses Univ. Lille III
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Lassiter D. 2017.. Graded Modality: Qualitative and Quantitative Perspectives. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lazard G. 1998.. L'expression de l'irréel: essai de typologie. . In Typology of Verbal Categories: Papers Presented to Vladimir Nedjalkov on the Occasion of His 70th Birthday, ed. L Kulikov, H Vater , pp. 23747. Tübingen, Ger:.: Niemeyer
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Lewis D. 1973.. Counterfactuals. Oxford, UK:: Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Martínez JO, Lester N. 2021.. A quantitative analysis of counterfactual conditionals in cross-linguistic perspective. . Ital. J. Linguist. 33:(2):14782
    [Google Scholar]
  36. McKay GR. 2000.. Grammatical sketches of Bunuba, Ndjébbana and Kugu Nganhcara. . In The Handbook of Australian Languages, Vol. 5, ed. RMW Dixon, BJ Blake , pp. 299312. Oxford/New York:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Merlan FC. 1994.. A Language of the Northern Territory of Australia. Berlin/New York:: De Gruyter Mouton
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Michaelis LA. 1993.. “ Continuity” within three scalar models: the polysemy of adverbial still. . J. Semant. 10:(3):193237
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  39. Moyse-Faurie C. 1995.. Langues et cultures du Pacifique, Vol. 10: Le xârâcùù, langue de Thio-Canala (Nouvelle-Calédonie). Paris:: Peeters
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Narrog H. 2009.. Studies in Language Companion Series, Vol. 109: Modality in Japanese: The Layered Structure of the Clause and Hierarchies of Functional Categories. Amsterdam:: John Benjamins
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Nedjalkov IV, Bulatova N. 2005.. Conditional constructions in Evenki. . In Typology of Conditional Constructions, ed. VS Xrakovski , pp. 55676. Munich:: Lincom Europa
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Nevins AI. 2002.. Counterfactuality without past tense. . In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 32), p. 9. Amherst, MA:: Grad. Linguist. Stud. Assoc.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Nichols L. 2002.. On a component of propositional attitudes in Burmese `aspectual' khe. Talk presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Francisco:, Jan. 3–6
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Portner P, Rubinstein A. 2016.. Extreme and non-extreme deontic modals. . In Deontic Modality, ed. N Charlow, M Chrisman , pp. 25682. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Prior AN. 1957.. Time and Modality. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Rubinstein A. 2020.. Weak necessity. . In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Semantics, ed. D Gutzmann, L Matthewson, C Meier, H Rullmann, T Zimmermann . Hoboken, NJ:: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118788516.sem105
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Thomason RH. 1970.. Indeterminist time and truth-value gaps. . Theoria 36:(3):26481
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  48. Thomason RH. 1984.. Combinations of tense and modality. . In Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 2, ed. D Gabbay, F Guenthner , pp. 13565. Dordrecht, Neth:.: D. Reidel
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Traugott EC. 2006.. The semantic development of scalar focus modifiers. . In The Handbook of the History of English, ed. A van Kemenade, B Los , pp. 33559. Padstow, UK:: Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
  50. van Driem G. 1987.. A Grammar of Limbu. Berlin/New York/Amsterdam:: Mouton Gramm. Libr.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Van Linden A, Verstraete JC. 2008.. The nature and origins of counterfactuality in simple clauses: cross-linguistic evidence. . J. Pragmat. 40::186595
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  52. Vander Klok JM, Hohaus V. 2020.. Weak necessity without weak possibility: the composition of modal strength distinctions in Javanese. . Semant. Pragmat. 13::12
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  53. von Fintel K, Iatridou S. 2008.. How to say ought in foreign: the composition of weak necessity modals. . In Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, Vol. 74: Time and Modality, ed. J Guéron, J Lecarme , pp. 11541. Dordrecht, Neth:.: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
  54. von Prince K. 2015.. A Grammar of Daakaka. Berlin/Boston:: De Gruyter Mouton
    [Google Scholar]
  55. von Prince K. 2019.. Counterfactuality and past. . Linguist. Philos. 42::577615
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  56. von Prince K, Krajinović A, Krifka M. 2022.. Irrealis is real. . Language 98:(2):22149
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  57. von Prince K, Krajinović A, Krifka M, Guérin V, Franjieh M. 2018.. Mapping irreality: storyboards for eliciting TAM contexts. . In Proceedings of Linguistic Evidence 2018, ed. A Gattnar, R Hörnig, M Störzer , pp. 187207. Tübingen, Ger:.: Univ. Tübingen
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Wang Y. 2012.. The Ingredients of Counterfactuality in Mandarin Chinese. PhD Thesis , Hong Kong Polytech. Univ., Hong Kong:
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Wang Y, Jiang Y. 2011.. . [ Approaching Formal Pragmatics] 9::139
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Yong Q. 2013.. Typological stage of counterfactuals in Chinese. . In Proceedings of the 27th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information, and Computation (PACLIC 27), pp. 32938. Taipei, Taiwan:: Dep. Engl., Natl. Chengchi Univ.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Yong Q. 2016.. A typology of counterfactual clauses. PhD Thesis , City Univ. Hong Kong, Hong Kong:
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011724-121349
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011724-121349
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error