e- and m-Health communication technologies are now common approaches to improving population health. The efficacy of behavioral nutrition interventions using e-health technologies to decrease fat intake and increase fruit and vegetable intake was demonstrated in studies conducted from 2005 to 2009, with approximately 75% of trials showing positive effects. By 2010, an increasing number of behavioral nutrition interventions were focusing on body weight. The early emphasis on interventions that were highly computer tailored shifted to personalized electronic interventions that included weight and behavioral self-monitoring as key features. More diverse target audiences began to participate, and mobile components were added to interventions. Little progress has been made on using objective measures rather than self-reported measures of dietary behavior. A challenge for nutritionists is to link with the private sector in the design, use, and evaluation of the many electronic devices that are now available in the marketplace for nutrition monitoring and behavioral change.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


Literature Cited

  1. Alexander GL, McClure JB, Calvi JH, Divine GW, Stopponi MA. 1.  et al. 2010. A randomized clinical trial evaluating online interventions to improve fruit and vegetable consumption. Am. J. Public Health 100:319–26 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bennett GG, Glasgow RE. 2.  2009. The delivery of public health interventions via the Internet: actualizing their potential. Annu. Rev. Public Health 30:273–92 [Google Scholar]
  3. Broekhuizen K, Kroeze W, van Poppel MNM, Oenema A, Brug J. 3.  2013. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored physical activity and dietary behavior promotion programs: an update. Ann. Behav. Med. 44:259–86 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brug J, Oenema A, Campbell M. 4.  2003. Past, present and future of computer-tailored nutrition education. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 77:Suppl.1028–34S [Google Scholar]
  5. Carter MC, Burley VJ, Nykjaer C, Cade JE. 5.  2013. Adherence to a smartphone application for weight loss compared to website and paper diary: pilot randomized controlled trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 15:4e32 [Google Scholar]
  6. Collins CE, Morgan PJ, Warren JM, Lubans DR, Callister R. 6.  2011. Men participating in a weight-loss intervention are able to implement key dietary messages, but not those relating to vegetables or alcohol: the Self-Help, Exercise, and Diet using Internet Technology (SHED-IT) study. Public Health Nutr. 14:1168–75 [Google Scholar]
  7. De Bourdeauhuij I, Stevens V, Vandelanotte C, Brug J. 7.  2007. Evaluation of an interactive computer-tailored nutrition intervention in a real-life setting. Ann. Behav. Med. 33:139–48 [Google Scholar]
  8. Duncan M, Vandelanotte C, Kolt GS, Rosenkranz RR, Caperchione CM. 8.  et al. 2014. Effectiveness of a web- and mobile phone-based intervention to promote physical activity and healthy eating in middle-aged males: randomized controlled trial of the ManUp study. J. Med. Internet Res. 16:6e136 [Google Scholar]
  9. Eng TR. 9.  2001. The eHealth Landscape: A Terrain Map of Emerging Information and Communication Technologies in Health and Health Care Princeton, NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Found. [Google Scholar]
  10. Harris J, Felix L, Miners A, Murray E, Michie S. 10.  et al. 2011. Adaptive e-learning to improve dietary behaviour: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol. Assess. 15:37i–160 [Google Scholar]
  11. Herring SJ, Cruice JF, Bennett GG, Davey A, Foste GD. 11.  2014. Using technology to promote postpartum weight loss in urban, low-income mothers: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 46:610–15 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hou S-I, Charlery SR, Roberson K. 12.  2014. Systematic literature review of Internet interventions across health behaviors. Health Psychol. Behav. Med. 2:1455–81 [Google Scholar]
  13. Huang A, Barzi F, Huxley R, Denyer G, Rohrlach B. 13.  et al. 2006. The effects on saturated fat purchases of providing internet shoppers with purchase-specific dietary advice: a randomized controlled trial. PLOS Clin. Trial 1:5e22 [Google Scholar]
  14. 14. Int. Telecommun. Union 2013. ICT Facts and Figures 2013. http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/statistics/Documents/facts/ICTFactsFigures2013-e.pdf [Google Scholar]
  15. 15. Internet World Stats 2015. Internet Usage Statistics: The Internet Big Picture. World Internet Users and 2015 Population Stats. http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm [Google Scholar]
  16. Kohl LFM, Crutzen R, de Vries NK. 16.  2013. Online prevention aimed at lifestyle behaviors: a systematic review of reviews. J. Med. Internet Res. 15:7e146 [Google Scholar]
  17. Krebs P, Prochaska JO, Rossi JS. 17.  2010. A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. Prev. Med. 51:214–21 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kroeze W, Oenema A, Campbell M, Brug J. 18.  2008. The efficacy of web-based and print-delivered computer-tailored interventions to reduce fat intake: results of a randomized, controlled trial. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 40:226–36 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kypri K, McAnally HM. 19.  2005. Randomized controlled trial of a web-based primary care intervention for multiple health risk behaviors. Prev. Med. 41:761–66 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K. 20.  et al. 2012. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380:98592224–60 [Google Scholar]
  21. Lohse B, Belue R, Smith S, Wamboldt P, Cunningham-Sabo L. 21.  2015. About Eating: an online program with evidence of increased food resource management skills for low-income women. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 47:265–72 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lytle LA, Svetkey LP, Patrick K, Belle SH, Fernandez ID. 22.  et al. 2014. The EARLY trials: a consortium of studies targeting weight control in young adults. Transl. Behav. Med. 4:304–13 [Google Scholar]
  23. Murray E. 23.  2012. Web-based interventions for behavior change and self-management: potential, pitfalls, and progress. Med. 2.0 1:2e3 [Google Scholar]
  24. Neville LM, O'Hara B, Milat AJ. 24.  2009. Computer-tailored dietary behaviour change interventions: a systematic review. Health Educ. Res. 24:4699–720 [Google Scholar]
  25. Norman GJ, Zabinski MF, Adams MA, Rosenberg DE, Yarock AL, Atienza AA. 25.  2007. A review of eHealth interventions for physical activity and dietary behavior change. Am. J. Prev. Med. 33:4336–45 [Google Scholar]
  26. Oenema A, Brug J, Dijkstra A, de Weerdt I, de Vries H. 26.  2008. Efficacy and use of an internet-delivered computer-tailored lifestyle intervention, targeting saturated fat intake, physical activity and smoking cessation: a randomized controlled trial. Ann. Behav. Med. 35:125–35 [Google Scholar]
  27. Oenema A, Tan F, Brug J. 27.  2005. Short-term efficacy of a web-based computer-tailored nutrition intervention: main effects and mediators. Ann. Behav. Med. 29:154–63 [Google Scholar]
  28. Papadaki A, Scott JA. 28.  2005. The Mediterranean Eating in Scotland Experience project: evaluation of an Internet-based intervention promoting the Mediterranean diet. Br. J. Nutr. 94:290–98 [Google Scholar]
  29. Patrick K, Calfas KJ, Norman GJ, Rosenberg D, Zabinski MF. 29.  et al. 2011. Outcomes of a 12-month web-based intervention for overweight and obese men. Ann. Behav. Med. 42:3391–401 [Google Scholar]
  30. Ritterband LM, Thorndike F. 30.  2006. Internet interventions or patient education websites?. J. Med. Internet Res. 8:e18 [Google Scholar]
  31. Rothert K, Strecher VJ, Doyle LA, Caplan WM, Joyce JS. 31.  et al. 2006. Web-based weight management programs in an integrated health care setting: a randomized controlled trial. Obesity 14:266–72 [Google Scholar]
  32. Springvloet L, Lechner L, de Vries H, Candel MJ, Oenema A. 32.  2015. Short- and medium-term efficacy of a Web-based computer-tailored nutrition education intervention for adults including cognitive and environmental feedback: a randomized controlled trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 17:1e23 [Google Scholar]
  33. Sternfeld B, Block C, Quesenberry CP Jr, Block TJ, Husson G. 33.  et al. 2009. Improving diet and physical activity with ALIVE: a worksite randomized trial. Am. J. Prev. Med. 36:6475–83 [Google Scholar]
  34. Trinh L. 34.  2009. The effect of an online nutrition intervention on fruit and vegetable intake among women Unpubl. Master's Thesis, Calif. State Univ., Fullerton [Google Scholar]
  35. Turner-McGrievy G, Tate D. 35.  2011. Tweets, apps, and pods: results of the 6-month Mobile Pounds Off Digitally (Mobile POD) randomized weight-loss intervention among adults. J. Med. Internet Res. 13:4e120 [Google Scholar]
  36. Vandelanotte C, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Sallis JF, Spittaels H, Brug J. 36.  2005. Efficacy of sequential or simultaneous interactive computer-tailored interventions for increasing physical activity and decreasing fat intake. Ann. Behav. Med. 29:2138–46 [Google Scholar]
  37. Winett RA, Anderson ES, Wojcik JR, Winett SG, Bowden T. 37.  2007. Guide to Health: nutrition and physical activity outcomes of a group-randomized trial of an internet-based intervention in churches. Ann. Behav. Med. 33:3251–61 [Google Scholar]
  38. Winett RA, Anderson ES, Wojcik JR, Winett SG, Moore S, Blake C. 38.  2011. Guide to Health: a randomized controlled trial of the effects of a completely web-based intervention on physical activity, fruit and vegetable consumption and body weight. Transl. Behav. Med. 1:1165–74 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error