1932

Abstract

In this manuscript we review research on the effectiveness of work-life balance (WLB) policies in improving employee and organizational outcomes. We find that while WLB policies are often implemented with good intentions, their effects are generally small or inconsistent. We identify eight barriers to policy inclusivity that we theorize are linked to reduced effectiveness—a narrow definition of family, focusing on work-family rather than work-nonwork balance, low policy awareness, the practical constraints of access, overlooking vulnerable workers, the nature of the job, supervisor attitudes and behaviors, and unsupportive organizational cultures—and make recommendations for addressing these barriers. We also highlight the importance of considering individual differences and cultural contexts when implementing WLB policies. We conclude by proposing future research directions, such as examining coworker support and the impact of national culture on policy effectiveness.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110622-050544
2025-01-21
2025-02-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/orgpsych/12/1/annurev-orgpsych-110622-050544.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110622-050544&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Allen TD. 2001.. Family-supportive work environments: the role of organizational perceptions. . J. Vocat. Behav. 58:(3):41435. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2000.1774
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen TD, French KA. 2023.. Work-family research: a review and next steps. . Pers. Psychol. 76:(2):43771. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12573
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  3. Allen TD, Golden TD, Shockley KM. 2015.. How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. . Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 16:(2):4068. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  4. Allen TD, Johnson RC, Kiburz KM, Shockley KM. 2013.. Work-family conflict and flexible work arrangements: deconstructing flexibility. . Pers. Psychol. 66:(2):34576. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12012
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  5. Allen TD, Lapierre LM, Spector PE, Poelmans SAY, O'Driscoll M, et al. 2014.. The link between national paid leave policy and work-family conflict among married working parents. . Appl. Psychol. 63:(1):528. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12004
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  6. Am. Psychol. Assoc. 2022.. Workers appreciate and seek mental health support in the workplace. . American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/pubs/reports/work-well-being/2022-mental-health-support#:∼:text=A%20majority%20(81%25)%20of,into%20their%20future%20job%20decisions
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Anand S, Hu J, Vidyarthi P, Liden RC. 2018.. Leader-member exchange as a linking pin in the idiosyncratic deals—performance relationship in workgroups. . Leadersh. Q. 29:(6):698708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.005
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  8. Anand S, Mitra A. 2022.. No family left behind: flexibility i-deals for employees with stigmatized family identities. . Hum. Relat. 75:(5):95688. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726721999708
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bagger J, Li A. 2014.. How does supervisory family support influence employees' attitudes and behaviors? A social exchange perspective. . J. Manag. 40:(4):112350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311413922
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Baird CL, Reynolds JR. 2004.. Employee awareness of family leave benefits: the effects of family, work and gender. . Sociol. Q. 45:(2):32553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2004.tb00015.x
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bartel AP, Rossin-Slater M, Ruhm CJ, Stearns J, Waldfogel J. 2018.. Paid family leave, fathers’ leave-taking, and leave-sharing in dual-earner households. . J. Policy Anal. Manag. 37:(1):1037. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22030
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  12. Baum CL II, Ruhm CJ. 2016.. The effects of paid leave in California on labor market outcomes. . J. Policy Anal. Manag. 35:(2):33356. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21894
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  13. Beauregard TA. 2014.. Fairness perceptions of work-life balance initiatives: effects on counterproductive work behaviour. . Br. J. Manag. 25:(4):77289. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12052
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  14. Beauregard TA, Ozbilgin M, Bell MP. 2009.. Revisiting the social construction of family in the context of work. . J. Manag. Psychol. 24:(1):4665. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940910922537
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bennett AA, Campion ED, Keeler KR, Keener SK. 2021.. Videoconference fatigue? Exploring changes in fatigue after videoconference meetings during COVID-19. . J. Appl. Psychol. 106:(3):33044. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/apl0000906
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  16. Berg P, Kossek EE, Misra K, Belman D. 2014.. Work-life flexibility policies: Do unions affect employee access and use?. Ind. Labor Relat. Rev. 67:(1):11137. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979391406700105
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  17. Biron M, Casper WJ, Raghuram S. 2023.. Crafting telework: a process model of need satisfaction to foster work-nonwork balance and job performance. . Pers. Rev. 52:(3):67186. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-04-2021-0259
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  18. Blight M, Lambertz-Berndt M, Fetherston M, Fonner KL. 2022.. It's like you need a family to have a reason to leave on time: family type and the perceived inclusiveness of work-life practices. . West. J. Commun. 86:(1):3959. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2021.1994637
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bourdeau S, Ollier-Malaterre A, Houlfort N. 2019.. Not all work-life policies are created equal: career consequences of using enabling versus enclosing work-life policies. . Acad. Manag. Rev. 44:(1):17293. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0429
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  20. Breaugh JA, Frye NK. 2008.. Work-family conflict: the importance of family-friendly employment practices and family-supportive supervisors. . J. Bus. Psychol. 22::34553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-008-9081-1
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  21. Bur. Labor Stat. 2022.. A look at paid family leave by wage category in 2021. . Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2022/a-look-at-paid-family-leave-by-wage-category-in-2021.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Bur. Labor Stat. 2023.. What data does the BLS publish on family leave?. Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/ebs/factsheets/family-leave-benefits-fact-sheet.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Butts MM, Casper WJ, Yang TS. 2013.. How important are work-family support policies? A meta-analytic investigation of their effects on employee outcomes. . J. Appl. Psychol. 98:(1):125. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0030389
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  24. Byker TS. 2016.. Paid parental leave laws in the United States: Does short-duration leave affect women's labor force attachment?. Am. Econ. Rev. 106:(5):24246. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161118
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  25. Casper WJ, Buffardi LC. 2004.. The impact of work-life benefits and perceived organizational support on job pursuit intentions. . J. Vocat. Behav. 65:(3):391410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2003.09.003
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  26. Casper WJ, Fox KE, Sitzmann TM, Landy AL. 2004.. Supervisor referrals to work-family programs. . J. Occup. Health Psychol. 9:(2):13651. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/1076-8998.9.2.136
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  27. Casper WJ, Harris CM. 2008.. Work-life benefits and organizational attachment: self-interest utility and signaling theory models. . J. Vocat. Behav. 72:(1):95109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.10.015
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  28. Casper WJ, Marquardt DJ, Roberto KJ, Buss C. 2016.. The hidden family lives of single adults without dependent children. . In The Oxford Handbook of Work and Family, ed. TD Allen, LT Eby , pp. 18295. New York:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Casper WJ, Vaziri H, Wayne JH, DeHauw S, Greenhaus J. 2018.. The jingle-jangle of work-nonwork balance: a comprehensive and meta-analytic review of its meaning and measurement. . J. Appl. Psychol. 103:(2):182214. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/apl0000259
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  30. Casper WJ, Weltman D, Kwesiga E. 2007.. Beyond family-friendly: the construct and measurement of singles-friendly work culture. . J. Vocat. Behav. 70:(3):478501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.01.001
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  31. Castañeda M, Zambrana RE, Marsh K, Vega W, Becerra R, Pérez DJ. 2015.. Role of institutional climate on underrepresented faculty perceptions and decision making in use of work-family policies. . Family Relat. 64::71125. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12159
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  32. Chen Y, Fulmer IS. 2018.. Fine-tuning what we know about employees' experience with flexible work arrangements and their job attitudes. . Hum. Resour. Manag. 57:(1):38195. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21849
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  33. Choi J, Kim A, Han K, Ryu S, Park JG, Kwon B. 2018.. Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction with work-family balance: a moderating role of perceived insider status. . J. Organ. Behav. 39:(1):111. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2205
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  34. Chordiya R. 2019.. Are federal childcare programs sufficient for employee retention? Critical examination from a gendered perspective. . Am. Rev. Public Adm. 49:(3):33852. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074018804662
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  35. Conzon VM. 2023.. The equality policy paradox: gender differences in how managers implement gender equality-related policies. . Adm. Sci. Q. 68:(3):64890. https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392231174235
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  36. Cook A. 2009.. Connecting work-family policies to supportive work environments. . Group Organ. Manag. 34:(2):20640. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601108330091
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  37. de Menezes LM, Kelliher C. 2017.. Flexible working, individual performance, and employee attitudes: comparing formal and informal arrangements. . Hum. Resour. Manag. 56:(6):105170. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21822
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  38. De Sivatte I, Guadamillas F. 2013.. Antecedents and outcomes of implementing flexibility policies in organizations. . Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 24:(7):132745. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.561225
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  39. Demerouti E. 2023.. Effective employee strategies for remote working: an online self-training intervention. . J. Vocat. Behav. 142::103857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2023.103857
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  40. Dikkers JS, Geurts SA, Dulk LD, Peper B, Taris TW, Kompier MA. 2007.. Dimensions of work-home culture and their relations with the use of work-home arrangements and work-home interaction. . Work Stress 21:(2):15572. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370701442190
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  41. Dixon J, Dougherty DS. 2014.. A language convergence/meaning divergence analysis exploring how LGBTQ and single employees manage traditional family expectations in the workplace. . J. Appl. Commun. Res. 42:(1):119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2013.847275
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  42. Dugan AG, Barnes-Farrell JL. 2020.. Working mothers’ second shift, personal resources, and self-care. . Commun. Work Family 23:(1):6279. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2018.1449732
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  43. Eren S, Schweyer A, Lin M, Allen L. 2023.. Job Satisfaction 2023. Rep. , Conf. Board, New York:. https://www.conference-board.org/research/job-satisfaction/US-worker-satisfaction-continues-to-increase
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Evertsson M. 2016.. Parental leave and careers: women's and men's wages after parental leave in Sweden. . Adv. Life Course Res. 29::2640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2016.02.002
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  45. Fiksenbaum LM. 2014.. Supportive work-family environments: implications for work-family conflict and well-being. . Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 25:(5):65372. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.796314
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  46. Fleischmann A, Sieverding M. 2015.. Reactions toward men who have taken parental leave: Does the length of parental leave matter?. Sex Roles 72::46276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0469-x
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  47. Flynn E, Leslie LM. 2023.. Progressive or pressuring? The signaling effects of egg freezing coverage and other work-life policies. . J. Appl. Psychol. 108:(1):126. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/apl0001023
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  48. French KA, Shockley KM. 2020.. Formal and informal supports for managing work and family. . Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 29:(2):20716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420906218
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  49. Gajendran RS, Harrison DA. 2007.. The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. . J. Appl. Psychol. 92:(6):152441. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  50. Gajendran RS, Harrison DA, Delaney-Klinger K. 2015.. Are telecommuters remotely good citizens? Unpacking telecommuting's effects on performance via i-deals and job resources. . Pers. Psychol. 68:(2):35393. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12082
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  51. Gan J, Zhou ZE, Tang H, Ma H, Gan Z. 2023.. What it takes to be an effective remote leader during the COVID-19 crisis: the combined effects of supervisor control and support behaviors. . Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 34:(15):290123. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2022.2079953
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  52. Gartzia L, Sánchez-Vidal ME, Cegarra-Leiva D. 2018.. Male leaders with paternity leaves: effects of work norms on effectiveness evaluations. . Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 27:(6):793808. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1540466
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Goff SJ, Mount MK, Jamison RL. 1990.. Employer supported childcare, work/family conflict, and absenteeism: a field study. . Pers. Psychol. 43:(4):793809. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1990.tb00683.x
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  54. Golden TD, Eddleston KA. 2020.. Is there a price telecommuters pay? Examining the relationship between telecommuting and objective career success. . J. Vocat. Behav. 116::103348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103348
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  55. Gong S, Wang S. 2022.. Family policy awareness and marital intentions: a national survey experimental study. . Demography 59:(1):24766. https://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-9624150
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  56. Goodman JM, Richardson DM, Dow WH. 2022.. Racial and ethnic inequities in paid family and medical leave: United States, 2011 and 2017–2018. . Am. J. Public Health 112:(7):105058. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.306825
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  57. Grover SL, Crooker KJ. 1995.. Who appreciates family-responsive human resource policies: the impact of family-friendly policies on the organizational attachment of parents and non-parents. . Pers. Psychol. 48:(2):27188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01757.x
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  58. Haar JM, Spell CS. 2004.. Programme knowledge and value of work-family practices and organizational commitment. . Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 15:(6):104055. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190410001677304
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  59. Hammer LB, Kossek EE, Anger WK, Bodner T, Zimmerman KL. 2011.. Clarifying work-family intervention processes: the roles of work-family conflict and family-supportive supervisor behaviors. . J. Appl. Psychol. 96:(1):13450. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0020927
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  60. Hammer LB, Neal MB, Newsom JT, Brockwood KJ, Colton CL. 2005.. A longitudinal study of the effects of dual-earner couples' utilization of family-friendly workplace supports on work and family outcomes. . J. Appl. Psychol. 90:(4):799810. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.799
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  61. Hornsby EE, Munn SL. 2009.. University work-life benefits and same-sex couples. . Adv. Dev. Hum. Resour. 11:(1):6781. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422308329199
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  62. Ierodiakonou C, Stavrou E. 2017.. Flexitime and employee turnover: the polycontextuality of regulation as cross-national institutional contingency. . Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 28:(21):300326. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1362658
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  63. Int. Labour Organ. 2024.. Statistics on women. . International Labour Organization. https://ilostat.ilo.org/topics/women/
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Joshi P, Baldigaa M, Earle A, Hubera R, Osypukc T, Acevedo-Garcia D. 2021.. How much would family and medical leave cost workers in the U.S.? Racial/ethnic variation in economic hardship under unpaid and paid policies. . Commun. Work Family 24:(5):51740. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2019.1704398
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  65. Kacmar KM, Andrews MC, Van Rooy DL, Steilberg RC, Cerrone S. 2006.. Sure everyone can be replaced…but at what cost? Turnover as a predictor of unit-level performance. . Acad. Manag. J. 49:(1):13344. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.20785670
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  66. Kalmanovich-Cohen H, Stanton SJ. 2023.. How can work from home support neurodiversity and inclusion?. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 16:(1):2024. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2022.93
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  67. Khalifa G, Sharif Z, Sultan M, Di Rezze B. 2020.. Workplace accommodations for adults with autism spectrum disorder: a scoping review. . Disabil. Rehabil. 42:(9):131631. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1527952
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  68. Kniffin KM, Narayanan J, Anseel F, Antonakis J, Ashford SP, et al. 2021.. COVID-19 and the workplace: implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. . Am. Psychol. 76:(1):6377. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/amp0000716
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  69. Koh CW, Allen TD, Zafar N. 2013.. Dissecting reasons for not telecommuting: Are nonusers a homogenous group?. Psychol.-Manag. J. 16:(4):24360. https://doi.org/10.1037/mgr0000008
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Kossek EE, Kelliher C. 2023.. Making flexibility more i-deal: advancing work-life equality collectively. . Group Organ. Manag. 48:(1):31749. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221098823
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  71. Kossek EE, Lautsch BA, Perrigino MB, Greenhaus JH, Merriweather TJ. 2023.. Work-life flexibility policies: moving from traditional views toward work-life intersectionality considerations. . In Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, ed. MR Buckley, AR Wheeler, JE Baur, JRB Halbesleben , pp. 199243. Leeds, UK:: Emerald Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Kossek EE, Nichol V. 1992.. The effects of on-site childcare on employee attitudes and performance. . Pers. Psychol. 45:(3):485509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1992.tb00857.x
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  73. Kossek EE, Pichler S, Bodner T, Hammer LB. 2011.. Workplace social support and work-family conflict: a meta-analysis clarifying the influence of general and work-family-specific supervisor and organizational support. . Pers. Psychol. 64:(2):289313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01211.x
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  74. Lambert SJ, Haley A. 2021.. Implementing work scheduling regulation: compliance and enforcement challenges at the local level. . ILR Rev. 74:(5):123157. https://doi.org/10.1177/00197939211031227
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  75. Lapierre LM, Li Y, Kwan HK, Greenhaus JH, DiRenzo MS, Shao P. 2018.. A meta-analysis of the antecedents of work-family enrichment. . J. Organ. Behav. 39:(4):385401. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2234
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  76. Lapierre LM, Van Steenbergen EF, Peeters MC, Kluwer ES. 2016.. Juggling work and family responsibilities when involuntarily working more from home: a multiwave study of financial sales professionals. . J. Organ. Behav. 37:(6):80422. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2075
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  77. Las Heras M, Rofcanin Y, Bal PM, Stollberger J. 2017.. How do flexibility i-deals relate to work performance? Exploring the roles of family performance and organizational context. . J. Organ. Behav. 38:(8):128094. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2203
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  78. Leroy S, Schmidt AM, Madjar N. 2021.. Working from home during COVID-19: a study of the interruption landscape. . J. Appl. Psychol. 106:(10):144865. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000972
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  79. Leslie LM, Manchester CF, Park TY, Mehng SA. 2012.. Flexible work practices: a source of career premiums or penalties?. Acad. Manag. J. 55:(6):140728. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0651
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  80. Liao C, Wayne SJ, Rousseau DM. 2016.. Idiosyncratic deals in contemporary organizations: a qualitative and meta-analytical review. . J. Organ. Behav. 37:(1):929. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1959
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Lutz N, Taeymans J, Ballmer C, Verhaeghe N, Clarys P, Deliens T. 2019.. Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit of worksite health promotion programs in Europe: a systematic review. . Eur. J. Public Health 29:(3):54046. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cky269
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  82. Mandeville A, Halbesleben J, Whitman M. 2016.. Misalignment and misperception in preferences to utilize family-friendly benefits: implications for benefit utilization and work-family conflict. . Pers. Psychol. 69:(4):895929. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12124
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  83. Masterson C, Sugiyama K, Ladge J. 2021.. The value of 21st century work-family supports: review and cross-level path forward. . J. Organ. Behav. 42:(2):11838. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2442
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  84. Masuda AD, Poelmans SA, Allen TD, Spector PE, Lapierre LM, et al. 2012.. Flexible work arrangements availability and their relationship with work-to-family conflict, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions: a comparison of three country clusters. . Appl. Psychol. 61:(1):129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00453.x
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  85. McIntosh C, Hyde SA, Bell MP, Yeatts P. 2023.. Thriving at work with ADHD: antecedents and consequences of proactive disclosure. . Equal. Divers. Incl. 42:(2):22847. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-02-2022-0033
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  86. Natl. Partnersh. Women Fam. 2023.. State paid family and medical leave laws. Rep. , Natl. Partnersh. Women Fam., Washington, DC:. https://nationalpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/state-paid-family-leave-laws.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  87. OECD (Organ. Econ. Coop. Dev.). 2023.. LMF2.2. Patterns of employment and the distribution of working hours for couples with children. OECD Fam. Database, Sept. https://www.oecd.org/els/family/LMF-2-2-Distribution-working-hours-couple-households_DRAFT.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Parker K, Horowitz JM, Minkin R. 2022.. COVID-19 pandemic continues to reshape work in America. Rep. , Pew Res. Cent. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2022/02/16/covid-19-pandemic-continues-to-reshape-work-in-america/
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Perrigino MB, Dunford BB, Wilson KS. 2018.. Work-family backlash: the “dark side” of work-life balance (WLB) policies. . Acad. Manag. Ann. 12:(2):60030. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0077
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  90. Piszczek MM. 2020.. Reciprocal relationships between workplace childcare initiatives and collective turnover rates of men and women. . J. Manag. 46:(3):47094. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318799480
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Piszczek MM, Pimputkar AS. 2021.. Flexible schedules across working lives: age-specific effects on well-being and work. . J. Appl. Psychol. 106:(12):190720. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000844
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  92. Rainey A, Melzer SM. 2021.. The organizational context of supervisory bullying: diversity/equity and work-family policies. . Work Occup. 48:(3):285319. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888421997518
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  93. Ramsey M. 2024.. Innovative approaches to paid leave. . HR Quarterly, June 24. https://www.shrm.org/topics-tools/news/hr-quarterly/innovative-approaches-to-paid-leave
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Rau BL, Hyland MAM. 2002.. Role conflict and flexible work arrangements: the effects on applicant attraction. . Pers. Psychol. 55:(1):11136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00105.x
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  95. Rothausen TJ, Gonzalez JA, Clarke NE, O'Dell LL. 1998.. Family-friendly backlash—fact or fiction? The case of organizations' on-site childcare centers. . Pers. Psychol. 51:(3):685706. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00257.x
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  96. Rothbard NP, Beetz AM, Harari D. 2021.. Balancing the scales: a configurational approach to work-life balance. . Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 8::73103. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-061833
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  97. Rothbard NP, Phillips KW, Dumas TL. 2005.. Managing multiple roles: work-family policies and individuals’ desires for segmentation. . Organ. Sci. 16:(3):24358. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0124
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  98. Rudman LA, Mescher K. 2013.. Penalizing men who request a family leave: Is flexibility stigma a femininity stigma?. J. Soc. Issues 69:(2):32240. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12017
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  99. Ryan AM, Kossek EE. 2008.. Work-life policy implementation: breaking down or creating barriers to inclusiveness?. Hum. Resour. Manag. 47:(2):295310. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20213
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  100. Samtleben C, Bringmann J, Bünning M, Hipp L. 2019.. What helps and what hinders? Exploring the role of workplace characteristics for parental leave use and its career consequences. . Soc. Sci. 8:(10):270. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8100270
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  101. Schaeffer K. 2024.. For Women's History Month, a look at gender gains—and gaps—in the U.S. Rep., Pew Res. Cent. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/02/27/for-womens-history-month-a-look-at-gender-gains-and-gaps-in-the-us/
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Schooreel T, Verbruggen M. 2016.. Use of family-friendly work arrangements and work-family conflict: crossover effects in dual-earner couples. . J. Occup. Health Psychol. 21:(1):11932. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039669
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  103. Shockley KM, Allen TD. 2007.. When flexibility helps: another look at the availability of flexible work arrangements and work-family conflict. . J. Vocat. Behav. 71:(3):47993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.08.006
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  104. Shockley KM, Allen TD. 2010.. Investigating the missing link in flexible work arrangement utilization: an individual difference perspective. . J. Vocat. Behav. 76:(1):13142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.07.002
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  105. Shockley KM, Allen TD, Dodd H, Waiwood AM. 2021a.. Remote worker communication during COVID-19: the role of quantity, quality, and supervisor expectation-setting. . J. Appl. Psychol. 106:(10):146682. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000970
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  106. Shockley KM, Gabriel AS, Robertson D, Rosen CC, Chawla N, et al. 2021b.. The fatiguing effects of camera use in virtual meetings: a within-person field experiment. . J. Appl. Psychol. 106:(8):113755. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000948
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  107. Sousa C, Esperanca J, Goncalves G. 2022.. Pets at work: Effects on social responsibility perception and organizational commitment. . Psychol. Leaders Leadersh. 25:(2):14463
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  108. Stavrou ET. 2005.. Flexible work bundles and organizational competitiveness: a cross-national study of the European work context. . J. Organ. Behav. 26:(8):92347. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.356
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  109. Stavrou ET, Ierodiakonou C. 2016.. Entitlement to work-life balance support: employee/manager perceptual discrepancies and their effect on outcomes. . Hum. Resour. Manag. 55:(5):84569. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21745
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  110. Su X, Bozeman B. 2016.. Family-friendly policies in STEM departments: awareness and determinants. . Res. Higher Educ. 57::9901009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-016-9412-4
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  111. ten Brummelhuis LL, van der Lippe T. 2010.. Effective work-life balance support for various household structures. . Hum. Resour. Manag. 49:(2):17393. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20340
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  112. Thébaud S, Pedulla DS. 2022.. When do work-family policies work? Unpacking the effects of stigma and financial costs for men and women. . Work Occup. 49:(2):22963. https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884211069914
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  113. Thompson CA, Beauvais LL, Lyness KS. 1999.. When work-family benefits are not enough: the influence of work-family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and work-family conflict. . J. Vocat. Behav. 54:(3):392415. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1998.1681
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  114. Thompson RJ, Payne SC, Taylor AB. 2015.. Applicant attraction to flexible work arrangements: separating the influence of flextime and flexplace. . J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 88:(4):72649. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12095
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  115. Tortez LM, Mills MJ. 2022.. In good company? Development and validation of the family-supportive coworker behavior scale. . J. Vocat. Behav. 136::103724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103724
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  116. Wang B, Liu Y, Qian J, Parker SK. 2021.. Achieving effective remote work during the COVID-19 pandemic: a work design perspective. . Appl. Psychol. 70:(1):1659. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12290
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  117. Wayne JH, Butts MM, Casper WJ, Allen TD. 2017.. In search of balance: a conceptual and empirical integration of multiple meanings of work-family balance. . Pers. Psychol. 70:(1):167210. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12132
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  118. Wayne JH, Casper WJ. 2016.. Why having a family-supportive culture, not just policies, matters to male and female job seekers: an examination of work-family conflict, values, and self-interest. . Sex Roles 75:(9–10):45975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0645-7
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  119. Wayne JH, Cordeiro BL. 2003.. Who is a good organizational citizen? Social perception of male and female employees who use family leave. . Sex Roles 49:(5–6):23346. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024600323316
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  120. Wilkin CL, Fairlie P, Ezzedeen SR. 2016.. Who let the dogs in? A look at pet-friendly workplaces. . Int. J. Workplace Health Manag. 9:(1):96109. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-04-2015-0021
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110622-050544
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110622-050544
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error