Electronic Monitoring at Work

Literature Cited

1. Abraham M, Niessen C, Schnabel C, Lorek K, Grimm V, et al. 2019.. Electronic monitoring at work: the role of attitudes, functions, and perceived control for the acceptance of tracking technologies. . Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 29::657–75
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
2. Adams I, Mastracci S. 2019.. Police body-worn cameras: effects on officers’ burnout and perceived organizational support. . Police Q. 22::5–30
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
3. Ahn C, Lee S, Sun C, Jebelli H, Yang K, Choi B. 2019.. Wearable sensing technology applications in construction safety and health. . J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 145::03119007
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
4. Ajunwa I, Crawford K, Schultz J. 2017.. Limitless worker surveillance. . Calif. Law Rev. 105::735–76
   [Google Scholar]
5. Akenhead R, Nassis GP. 2016.. Training load and player monitoring in high-level football: current practice and perceptions. . Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perf. 11::587–93
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
6. Alder GS, Noel TW, Ambrose ML. 2006.. Clarifying the effects of Internet monitoring on job attitudes: the mediating role of employee trust. . Inf. Manag. 43::894–903
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
7. Alder GS, Schminke M, Noel TW, Kuenzi M. 2008.. Employee reactions to internet monitoring. . J. Bus. Ethics 80::481–98
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
8. Alge BJ. 2001.. Effects of computer surveillance on perceptions of privacy and procedural justice. . J. Appl. Psychol. 86::797–804
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
9. Alge BJ, Hansen SD. 2013.. Workplace monitoring and surveillance research since “1984. .” In The Psychology of Workplace Technology, ed. MD Coovert, LF Thompson , pp. 209–37. New York:: Routledge
   [Google Scholar]
10. Allen MW, Coopman SJ, Hart JL, Walker KL. 2007.. Workplace surveillance and managing privacy boundaries. . Manag. Commun. Q. 21::172–200
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
11. Anderson R. 1998.. On the security of digital tachographs. . In Proceedings of the ESORICS 98: 5th European Symposium on Research in Computer Security, pp. 111–25. Louvain-la-Neuve, Belg:.: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
12. Anteby M, Chan CK. 2018.. A self-fulfilling cycle of coercive surveillance: workers’ invisibility practices and managerial justification. . Organ. Sci. 29::247–63
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
13. Ariel B, Harinam V, Zeynel S, Brogden J, Webster K. 2024.. Reducing the Risk of Workplace Violence Against Public-Facing Employees: Findings from a Mix-Methods Study of Body-Worn Cameras. Cham, Switz:.: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
14. Ariel B, Sutherland A, Henstock D, Young J, Drover P, et al. 2018.. Paradoxical effects of self-awareness of being observed: testing the effect of police body-worn cameras on assaults and aggression against officers. . J. Exp. Criminol. 14::19–47
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
15. Backhaus N. 2019.. Context sensitive technologies and electronic employee monitoring: a meta-analytic review. . In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII), pp. 548–53. Paris:: IEEE
    [Google Scholar]
16. Ball K. 2021.. Electronic Monitoring and Surveillance in the Workplace: Literature Review and Policy Implications. Luxembourg:: Publ. Off. Eur. Union
    [Google Scholar]
17. Bechter B, Brandl B, Lehr A. 2022.. The role of the capability, opportunity, and motivation of firms for using human resource analytics to monitor employee performance: a multi-level analysis of the organisational, market, and country context. . New Technol. Work Employ. 37::398–424
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
18. Belot M, Schröder M. 2015.. The spillover effects of monitoring: a field experiment. . Manag. Sci. 62::37–45
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
19. Bowell P, Smith GJD, Pechenkina E, Scifleet P. 2023.. ‘You're walking on eggshells’: exploring subjective experiences of workplace tracking. . Cult. Organ. 29::471–90
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
20. Bozionelos N, Simmering MJ. 2022.. Methodological threat or myth? Evaluating the current state of evidence on common method variance in human resource management research. . Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 32::194–215
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
21. Brussee V. 2023.. Social Credit: The Warring States of China's Emerging Data Empire. Singapore:: Palgrave Macmillan
    [Google Scholar]
22. Calvard T. 2019.. Integrating social scientific perspectives on the quantified employee self. . Soc. Sci. 8::262
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
23. Chalykoff J, Kochan TA. 1989.. Computer-aided monitoring: its influence on employee job satisfaction and turnover. . Pers. Psychol. 42::807–34
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
24. Charbonneau É, Doberstein C. 2020.. An empirical assessment of the intrusiveness and reasonableness of emerging work surveillance technologies in the public sector. . Public Adm. Rev. 80::780–91
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
25. Chen JCV, Ross WH. 2005.. The managerial decision to implement electronic surveillance at work. . Int. J. Organ. Anal. 13::244–68
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
26. Clarke RA. 1988.. Information technology and dataveillance. . Commun. ACM 31::498–512
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
27. Cropanzano R, Keplinger K, Lambert BK, Caza B, Ashford SJ. 2023.. The organizational psychology of gig work: an integrative conceptual review. . J. Appl. Psychol. 108::492–519
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
28. da Cunha JV. 2013.. A dramaturgical model of the production of performance data. . MIS Q. 37::723–48
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
29. de Groen WP, Kilhoffer Z, Westhoff L, Postica D, Shamsfakhr F. 2021.. Digital Labour Platforms in the EU: Mapping and Business Models. Luxembourg:: Publ. Off. Eur. Union
    [Google Scholar]
30. de Vries RE, van Gelder J-L. 2015.. Explaining workplace delinquency. . Personal. Individ. Differ. 86::112–16
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
31. Debus ME, Unger D, König CJ. 2020.. Job insecurity and performance over time: the critical role of job insecurity duration. . Career Dev. Int. 25::325–36
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
32. Eisenhardt KM. 1989.. Agency theory: an assessment and review. . Acad. Manag. Rev. 14::57–74
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
33. Elmholdt KT, Elmholdt C, Haahr L. 2021.. Counting sleep: ambiguity, aspirational control and the politics of digital self-tracking at work. . Organization 28::164–85
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
34. Eur. Parliam., Counc. Eur. Union. 2016.. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679
    [Google Scholar]
35. Frey BS. 1993.. Does monitoring increase work effort?. Econ. Inq. 31::663–70
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
36. Funder DC, Ozer DJ. 2019.. Evaluating effect size in psychological research: sense and nonsense. . Adv. Methods Pract. Psychol. Sci. 2::156–68
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
37. Fusi F, Feeney MK. 2018.. Electronic monitoring in public organizations: evidence from US local governments. . Public Manag. Rev. 20::1465–89
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
38. Gaddis ES, Burch RF V, Strawderman L, Chander H, Smith BK, et al. 2022.. The impact of using wearable devices on the operator during manual material handling tasks. . Int. J. Indus. Ergon. 89::103294
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
39. Green JJ. 1984.. Electronic monitoring in the workplace: the need for standards. . George Wash. Law Rev. 52::438–58
    [Google Scholar]
40. Greulich B, Debus ME, Kleinmann M, König CJ. 2021.. Response behavior in work stress surveys: a qualitative study on motivational and cognitive processes in self- and other-reports. . Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 30::40–57
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
41. Gurley LK. 2022.. Internal documents show Amazon's dystopian system for tracking workers every minute of their shifts. . Vice, June 2. https://www.vice.com/en/article/internal-documents-show-amazons-dystopian-system-for-tracking-workers-every-minute-of-their-shifts/
    [Google Scholar]
42. Hagen CS, Bighash L, Hollingshead AB, Shaikh SJ, Alexander KS. 2018.. Why are you watching? Video surveillance in organizations. . Corp. Commun. Int. J. 23::274–91
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
43. Hagl C, Kanitz R, Gonzalez K, Hoegl M. 2024.. Change management interventions: taking stock and moving forward. . Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 34::101000
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
44. Hansen Löfstrand C, Backman C. 2021.. Control or protection? Work environment implications of police body-worn cameras. . New Technol. Work Employ. 36::327–47
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
45. Heavey AL, Holwerda JA, Hausknecht JP. 2013.. Causes and consequences of collective turnover: a meta-analytic review. . J. Appl. Psychol. 98::412–53
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
46. Heikkilä P, Honka A, Kaasinen E, Väänänen K. 2021.. Quantified factory worker: field study of a web application supporting work well-being and productivity. . Cogn. Technol. Work 23::831–46
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
47. Hickok M, Maslej N. 2023.. A policy primer and roadmap on AI worker surveillance and productivity scoring tools. . AI Ethics 3::673–87
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
48. Hofstede G. 2001.. Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage. , 2nd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
49. Holland PJ, Cooper B, Hecker R. 2015.. Electronic monitoring and surveillance in the workplace: the effects on trust in management, and the moderating role of occupational type. . Pers. Rev. 44::161–75
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
50. Holman D, Chissick C, Totterdell P. 2002.. The effects of performance monitoring on emotional labor and well-being in call centers. . Motiv. Emot. 26::57–81
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
51. Hough P, North JS, Patterson SD, Pedlar C. 2021.. Monitoring athletes sleep: a survey of current trends amongst practitioners. . J. Sport Exerc. Sci. 5::277–84
    [Google Scholar]
52. Hovorka-Mead AD, Ross WH Jr., Whipple T, Renchin MB. 2002.. Watching the detectives: seasonal student employee reactions to electronic monitoring with and without advance notification. . Pers. Psychol. 55::329–62
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
53. Howard ME, Cori JM, Horrey WJ. 2019.. Vehicle and highway adaptations to compensate for sleepy drivers. . Sleep Med. Clin. 14::479–89
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
54. Humphrey SE, Nahrgang JD, Morgeson FP. 2007.. Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: a meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. . J. Appl. Psychol. 92::1332–56
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
55. Jacobs JV, Hettinger LJ, Huang Y-H, Jeffries S, Lesch MF, et al. 2019.. Employee acceptance of wearable technology in the workplace. . Appl. Ergon. 78::148–56
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
56. Jeske D. 2022.. Remote workers’ experiences with electronic monitoring during Covid-19: implications and recommendations. . Int. J. Workplace Health Manag. 15::393–409
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
57. Jiang H. 2019.. Understanding the impact of cyberloafing-related internet monitoring on employee job performance: a field experiment. . In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Art. no. 21. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2019/governance_is/governance_is/21
    [Google Scholar]
58. Jiang J. 2023.. Covert resistance against algorithmic control on online labor platforms: a systematic literature review. . In Thirty-first European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2023). Art. no. 272 . Kristiansand, Norway:. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2023_rp/272
    [Google Scholar]
59. Jiang L, Lavaysse LM. 2018.. Cognitive and affective job insecurity: a meta-analysis and a primary study. . J. Manag. 44::2307–42
    [Google Scholar]
60. Kalischko T, Riedl R. 2021.. Electronic performance monitoring in the digital workplace: conceptualization, review of effects and moderators, and future research opportunities. . Front. Psychol. 12::633031
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
61. Kayas OG. 2023.. Workplace surveillance: a systematic review, integrative framework, and research agenda. . J. Bus. Res. 168::114212
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
62. Kayas OG, Hines T, McLean R, Wright GH. 2019.. Resisting government rendered surveillance in a local authority. . Public Manag. Rev. 21::1170–90
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
63. Kidwell RE, Sprague R. 2009.. Electronic surveillance in the global workplace: laws, ethics, research and practice. . New Technol. Work Employ. 24::194–208
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
64. Kolb KJ, Aiello JR. 1996.. The effects of electronic performance monitoring on stress: locus of control as a moderator variable. . Comput. Hum. Behav. 12::407–23
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
65. Kolb KJ, Aiello JR. 1997.. Computer-based performance monitoring and productivity in a multiple task environment. . J. Bus. Psychol. 12::189–204
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
66. Komaki JL. 1986.. Toward effective supervision. . J. App. Psychol. 71::270–79
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
67. Lancaster BP. 1999.. Defining and interpreting suppressor effects: advantages and limitations. . In Advances in Social Science Methodology, ed. B Thompson , pp. 139–48. Stamford, CT:: JAI
    [Google Scholar]
68. Langer M, Hunsicker T, Feldkamp T, König CJ, Grgić-Hlača N. 2022.. “ Look! It's a computer program! It's an algorithm! It's AI!”: Does terminology affect human perceptions and evaluations of intelligent systems?. In Proceedings of the CHI '22: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Art. no. 581. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517527
    [Google Scholar]
69. Levy K. 2023.. Data Driven: Truckers, Technology, and the New Workplace Surveillance. Princeton, NJ:: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
70. Luczak T, Burch R, Lewis E, Chander H, Ball J. 2020.. State-of-the-art review of athletic wearable technology: what 113 strength and conditioning coaches and athletic trainers from the USA said about technology in sports. . Int. J. Sports Sci. Coach. 15::26–40
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
71. Lum C, Koper CS, Wilson DB, Stoltz M, Goodier M, et al. 2020.. Body-worn cameras’ effects on police officers and citizen behavior: a systematic review. . Campbell Syst. Rev. 16::e1112
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
72. Lum C, Stoltz M, Koper CS, Scherer JA. 2019.. Research on body-worn cameras: what we know, what we need to know. . Criminol. Public Policy 18::93–118
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
73. Lupton D. 2016.. The diverse domains of quantified selves: self-tracking modes and dataveillance. . Econ. Soc. 45::101–22
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
74. Luther C, Radovic I. 2012.. Perspectives on privacy, information technology, and company/governmental surveillance in Japan. . Surveill. Soc. 10::263–75
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
75. Lyon D. 2022.. Surveillance. . Internet Policy Rev. 11::1–18
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
76. Mallo J, Nordstrom CR, Bartels LK, Traxler A. 2007.. Electronic performance monitoring: the effect of age and task difficulty. . Perform. Improv. Q. 20::49–63
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
77. Manley A, Williams S. 2022.. ‘We're not run on numbers, we're people, we're emotional people’: exploring the experiences and lived consequences of emerging technologies, organizational surveillance and control among elite professionals. . Organization 29::692–713
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
78. Mann S, Nolan J, Wellman B. 2003.. Sousveillance: inventing and using wearable computing devices for data collection in surveillance environments. . Surveill. Soc. 1::331–55
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
79. Martin AJ, Wellen JM, Grimmer MR. 2016.. An eye on your work: how empowerment affects the relationship between electronic surveillance and counterproductive work behaviours. . Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 27::2635–51
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
80. McGuigan HE, Hassmen P, Rosic N, Stevens CJ. 2021.. Monitoring of training in high-performance athletes: What do practitioners do?. J. Sport Exerc. Sci. 5::121–29
    [Google Scholar]
81. Migliano S. 2023.. Employee monitoring software demand trends 2020–23. . Top10VPN.com. https://www.top10vpn.com/research/covid-employee-surveillance/
    [Google Scholar]
82. Neupert E, Gupta L, Holder T, Jobson SA. 2022.. Athlete monitoring practices in elite sport in the United Kingdom. . J. Sports Sci. 40::1450–57
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
83. Newlands G. 2021.. Algorithmic surveillance in the gig economy: the organization of work through Lefebvrian conceived space. . Organ. Stud. 42::719–37
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
84. Ng K, Ryba T. 2018.. The quantified athlete: associations of wearables for high school athletes. . Adv. Hum. -Comput. Interact. 2018::6317524
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
85. Nnaji C, Okpala I, Awolusi I. 2020.. Wearable sensing devices: potential impact & current use for incident prevention. . Prof. Saf. 65::16–24
    [Google Scholar]
86. O'Boyle E, Banks GC, Carter K, Walter S, Yuan Z. 2019.. A 20-year review of outcome reporting bias in moderated multiple regression. . J. Bus. Psychol. 34::19–37
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
87. Orwell G. 1949.. Nineteen Eighty-Four. London:: Secker & Warburg
    [Google Scholar]
88. Oz E, Glass R, Behling R. 1999.. Electronic workplace monitoring: what employees think. . Omega 27::167–77
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
89. Panina D, Aiello JR. 2005.. Acceptance of electronic monitoring and its consequences in different cultural contexts: a conceptual model. . J. Int. Manag. 11::269–92
    [Google Scholar]
90. Parkes H. 2023.. Watching me, watching you: worker surveillance in the UK after the pandemic. IPPR Rep. , Inst. Public Policy Res., London:
    [Google Scholar]
91. Patel V, Chesmore A, Legner CM, Pandey S. 2022.. Trends in workplace wearable technologies and connected-worker solutions for next-generation occupational safety, health, and productivity. . Adv. Intell. Syst. 4::2100099
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
92. Płaza M, Kazała R, Koruba Z, Kozłowski M, Lucińska M, et al. 2022.. Emotion recognition method for call/contact centre systems. . Appl. Sci. 12::10951
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
93. Pütz S, Rick V, Mertens A, Nitsch V. 2022.. Using IoT devices for sensor-based monitoring of employees’ mental workload: investigating managers’ expectations and concerns. . Appl. Ergon. 102::103739
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
94. Ravid DM, Tomczak DL, White JC, Behrend TS. 2019.. EPM 20/20: a review, framework, and research agenda for electronic performance monitoring. . J. Manag. 46::100–26
    [Google Scholar]
95. Ravid DM, White JC, Tomczak DL, Miles AF, Behrend TS. 2023.. A meta-analysis of the effects of electronic performance monitoring on work outcomes. . Pers. Psychol. 76::5–40
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
96. Reilly SM. 2010.. The use of electronic surveillance and performance measures in the workplace: a qualitative investigation. PhD Thesis , Durham Univ., Durham, UK:
    [Google Scholar]
97. Rietzschel EF, Slijkhuis M, Van Yperen NW. 2014.. Close monitoring as a contextual stimulator. . Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 23::394–404
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
98. Schall MC Jr., Sesek RF, Cavuoto LA. 2018.. Barriers to the adoption of wearable sensors in the workplace: a survey of occupational safety and health professionals. . Hum. Factors 60::351–62
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
99. Schmid W. 2000.. Arbeitszeiterfassung mit Uhren: Ein historischer Rückblick [Working time measurement with watches: a historical overview. ]. Jahresschr. Dtsch. Ges. Chronom. 39::97–112
    [Google Scholar]
100. Scott A, Balthrop A, Miller JW. 2021.. Unintended responses to IT-enabled monitoring: the case of the electronic logging device mandate. . J. Oper. Manag. 67::152–81
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
101. Sherif K, Jewesimi O, El-Masri M. 2021.. Empowering employees: the other side of electronic performance monitoring. . J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc. 19::207–21
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
102. Siegel R, Hentze J, Porsch L, König CJ. 2019.. Wie wirkt sich “digitale Kontrolle” auf die Arbeitnehmenden aus? Was sind mögliche Konsequenzen? [How does “digital control” affect employees? What are possible consequences?]. . AK Beitr. 2::47–63
     [Google Scholar]
103. Siegel R, König CJ, Lazar V. 2022.. The impact of electronic monitoring on employees’ job satisfaction, stress, performance, and counterproductive work behavior: a meta-analysis. . Comput. Hum. Behav. Rep. 8::100227
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
104. Siegel R, König CJ, Porsch L. 2021.. Does electronic monitoring pay off? Influences of electronic monitoring purposes on organizational attractiveness. . J. Pers. Psychol. 20::103–13
     [Google Scholar]
105. Snyder JA, Crow MS, Smykla JO. 2019.. Police officer and supervisor perceptions of body-worn cameras pre- and postimplementation: the importance of officer buy-in. . Crim. Justice Rev. 44::322–38
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
106. Spitzmüller C, Stanton JM. 2006.. Examining employee compliance with organizational surveillance and monitoring. . J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 79::245–72
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
107. Stahl BC, Prior M, Wilford S, Collins D. 2005.. Electronic monitoring in the workplace: If people don't care, then what is the relevance?. In Electronic Monitoring in the Workplace: Controversies and Solutions, ed. J Weckert , pp. 50–78. Hershey, PA:: IGI Glob.
     [Google Scholar]
108. Stanton JM. 2000.. Traditional and electronic monitoring from an organizational justice perspective. . J. Bus. Psychol. 15::129–47
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
109. Stanton JM, Julian AL. 2002.. The impact of electronic monitoring on quality and quantity of performance. . Comput. Hum. Behav. 18::85–101
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
110. Stark L, Stanhaus A, Anthony DL. 2020.. “I don't want someone to watch me while I'm working”: gendered views of facial recognition technology in workplace surveillance. . J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 71::1074–88
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
111. Stouten J, Rousseau DM, De Cremer D. 2018.. Successful organizational change: integrating the management practice and scholarly literatures. . Acad. Manag. Annals 12::752–88
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
112. Svertoka E, Saafi S, Rusu-Casandra A, Burget R, Marghescu I, et al. 2021.. Wearables for industrial work safety: a survey. . Sensors 21::3844
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
113. Taylor RE. 2012.. A cross-cultural view towards the ethical dimensions of electronic monitoring of employees: Does gender make a difference?. Int. Bus. Econ. Res. J. 11::529–34
     [Google Scholar]
114. Thiel CE, Prince N, Sahatjian Z. 2022.. The (electronic) walls between us: how employee monitoring undermines ethical leadership. . Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 32::743–58
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
115. Thompson DE, Molnar A. 2023.. Workplace surveillance in Canada: a survey on the adoption and use of employee monitoring applications. . Can. Rev. Sociol. 60::801–19
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
116. Tomczak DL, Lanzo LA, Aguinis H. 2018.. Evidence-based recommendations for employee performance monitoring. . Bus. Horiz. 61::251–59
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
117. Tong S, Jia N, Luo X, Fang Z. 2021.. The Janus face of artificial intelligence feedback: deployment versus disclosure effects on employee performance. . Strateg. Manag. J. 42::1600–31
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
118. Torka A-K, Mazei J, Bosco FA, Cortina JM, Götz M, et al. 2023.. How well are Open Science Practices implemented in industrial and organizational psychology and management?. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 32::461–75
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
119. US Congr. Off. Technol. Assess. 1987.. The electronic supervisor: New technology, new tensions. OTA-CIT Rep. 333 , US Gov. Print. Off., Washington, DC:
     [Google Scholar]
120. Van Acker BB, Conradie PD, Vlerick P, Saldien J. 2021.. Employee acceptability of wearable mental workload monitoring: exploring effects of framing the goal and context in corporate communication. . Cogn. Technol. Work 23::537–52
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
121. van den Broek EL. 2017.. Monitoring technology: The 21st century pursuit of well-being? EU-OSHA Discuss. Pap. , Eur. Agency Saf. Health Work, Brussels:
     [Google Scholar]
122. van Houten G, Russo G. 2020.. European Company Survey 2019: Workplace Practices Unlocking Employee Potential. Luxembourg:: Publ. Off. Eur. Union
     [Google Scholar]
123. Vaught BC, Taylor RE. 2000.. The attitudes of managers regarding the electronic monitoring of employee behavior. . Am. Bus. Rev. 18::107–14
     [Google Scholar]
124. White JC, Ravid DM, Behrend TS. 2020.. Moderating effects of person and job characteristics on digital monitoring outcomes. . Curr. Opin. Psychol. 31::55–60
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
125. Wieser L, Abraham M, Schnabel C, Niessen C, Wolff M. 2023.. When are employers interested in electronic performance monitoring? Results from a factorial survey experiment. IZA Discuss. Pap. Rep. 16261 , IZA Inst. Labor Econ., Bonn, Ger:.
     [Google Scholar]
126. Yost AB, Behrend TS, Howardson G, Darrow JB, Jensen JM. 2018.. Reactance to electronic surveillance: a test of antecedents and outcomes. . J. Bus. Psychol. 34::71–86
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
127. Zuboff S. 1981.. Psychological and organizational implications of computer-mediated work. MIT Cent. Inf. Syst. Res. Rep. 71 , MIT, Cambridge, MA:
     [Google Scholar]
128. Zweig D, Webster J. 2003.. Personality as a moderator of monitoring acceptance. . Comput. Hum. Behav. 19::479–93
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]