1932

Abstract

The claim that war is in decline has gained considerable traction among analysts and policy makers. This review surveys the empirical data as well as the theoretical arguments for a decline of war. It concludes that, while great power wars have declined since 1945, war in general is not necessarily in decline. Critiques of the claim that war is in decline range from the statistical to the anthropological. While war is not necessarily in decline, though, it has changed. Specifically, a major driver of the putative decline of war—international norms, laws, and institutions—has done more to change how war is discussed and presented than whether it is prosecuted. Stronger theories of change are needed in international relations to understand whether these somewhat superficial changes could deepen in ways that produce a true decline in war.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041923-115351
2025-06-17
2025-06-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/28/1/annurev-polisci-041923-115351.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041923-115351&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Altman D. 2017.. By fait accompli, not coercion: how states wrest territory from their adversaries. . Int. Stud. Q. 61::88191
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  2. Altman D. 2020.. The evolution of territorial conquest after 1945 and the limits of the territorial integrity norm. . Int. Organ. 74:(3):490522
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  3. Angell N. 1911.. The Great Illusion. New York:: Putnam
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Atzili B. 2006/2007.. When good fences make bad neighbors: border fixity, state weakness, and international conflict. . Int. Secur. 31:(3):13973
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  5. Badham J, dir. 1983.. War Games. Hollywood, CA:: United Artists/Sherwood Productions
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bellamy RF. 1984.. The causes of death in conventional land warfare: implications for combat casualty care research. . Mil. Med. 149:(2):5562
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bhatt C. 2013.. Simple minds: the evolutionary absolutism of Steven Pinker. . Sociology 47:(6):122932
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  8. Blix H. 2023.. A Farewell to Wars: The Growing Restraints on the Interstate Use of Force. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Braumoeller B. 2019.. Only the Dead: The Persistence of War in the Modern Age. New York:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Butcher CR, Griffiths RD. 2017.. Between Eurocentrism and Babel: a framework for the analysis of states, state systems, and international orders. . Int. Stud. Q. 61:(2):32836
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cirillo P, Taleb NN. 2016a.. The decline of violent conflicts: What do the data really say? Res. Pap. 2876315 , Tandon Sch. Eng., NYU, New York:
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cirillo P, Taleb NN. 2016b.. On the statistical properties and tail risk of violent conflicts. . Physica A 452::2945
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  13. Clauset A. 2018.. Trends and fluctuations in the severity of interstate wars. . Sci. Adv. 4:(2):aao3580
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  14. Collier P, Elliott VL, Hegre H, Hoeffler A, Reynal-Querol M, Sambanis N. 2003.. Breaking the Conflict Trap: Civil War and Development Policy. Washington, DC:: World Bank
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Cunningham D, Lemke D. 2013.. Combining civil and interstate wars. . Int. Organ. 67:(3):60927
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  16. Davies S, Engström G, Pettersson T, Öburg M. 2024.. Organized violence 1989–2023, and the prevalence of organized crime groups. . J. Peace Res. 61:(4):67393
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  17. Davies S, Pettersson T, Öburg M. 2023.. Organized violence 1989–2022, and the return of conflict between states. . J. Peace Res. 60:(4):691708
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ding J. 2024.. Technology and the Rise of Great Powers: How Diffusion Shapes Economic Competition. Princeton, NJ:: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Downes AB. 2021.. Catastrophic Success: Why Foreign-Imposed Regime Change Goes Wrong. Ithaca, NY:: Cornell Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Eastridge B, Mabry RL, Seguin P, Cantrell J, Tops T, et al. 2012.. Death on the battlefield (2001–2011): implications for the future of combat casualty care. . J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 73:(6, Suppl. 5 ):S43137
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  21. Falk D, Hildebolt C. 2017.. Annual war deaths in small-scale versus state societies scale with population size rather than violence. . Curr. Anthropol. 58:(6):80513
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fazal TM. 2007.. State Death: The Politics and Geography of Conquest, Occupation, and Annexation. Princeton, NJ:: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Fazal TM. 2014.. Dead wrong? Battle deaths, military medicine, and the exaggerated reports of war's demise. . Int. Secur. 39:(1):95125
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  24. Fazal TM. 2018.. Wars of Law: Unintended Consequences in the Regulation of Armed Conflict. Ithaca, NY:: Cornell Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Fazal TM. 2022.. The return of conquest? Why the future of global order hinges on Ukraine. . Foreign Aff. 101:(3):2027
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Fazal TM. 2024.. Military Medicine and the Hidden Costs of War. New York:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Fearon JD. 1995.. Rationalist explanations for war. . Int. Organ. 49:(3):379414
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ferguson RB. 2013.. Pinker's list: exaggerating prehistoric war mortality. . In War, Peace, and Human Nature: The Convergence of Evolutionary and Cultural Views, ed. DP Fry , pp. 11250. New York:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Fibiger L. 2018.. The past as a foreign country: bioarcheological perspectives on Pinker's “Prehistoric Anarchy. .” Hist. Reflect. 44:(1):616
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  30. Finnemore M. 1996.. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, NY:: Cornell Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Finnemore M. 2003.. The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs About the Use of Force. Ithaca, NY:: Cornell Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Finnemore M, Sikkink K. 1998.. International norm dynamics and political change. . Int. Organ. 52:(4):887917
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  33. Fortna VP. 2013.. Has violence declined in world politics? A discussion of Joshua S. Goldstein's Winning the War on War: The Decline of Armed Conflict Worldwide. . Perspect. Politics 11:(2):56670
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  34. Gaddis JL. 1986.. The long peace: elements of stability in the postwar international system. . Int. Secur. 10:(4):99142
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gleditsch KS, Ward MD. 1999.. A revised list of independent states since the Congress of Vienna. . Int. Interact. 25:(4):393413
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  36. Goldstein JS. 2011.. Winning the War on War: The Decline of Armed Conflict Worldwide. New York:: Dutton
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Hathaway OA, Shapiro SJ. 2017.. The Internationalists: How a Radical Plan to Outlaw War Remade the World. New York:: Simon & Schuster
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Herre B. 2024.. Millions have died in conflicts since the Cold War, most of them in Africa and intrastate conflicts. . Our World in Data Blog, July 15. https://ourworldindata.org/conflict-deaths-breakdown
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Hironaka A. 2005.. Neverending Wars: The International Community, Weak States, and the Perpetuation of Civil War. Cambridge, MA:: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Holsti KJ. 1991.. Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order, 1648–1989. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Hunt L. 2007.. Inventing Human Rights: A History. New York:: Norton
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Irajpanah K, Schultz KA. 2021.. Off the menu: post-1945 norms and the end of war declarations. . Secur. Stud. 30:(4):485516
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  43. Jervis R. 1979/1980.. Why nuclear superiority doesn't matter. . Political Sci. Q. 94:(4):61733
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kalyvas SN, Balcells L. 2010.. International system and technologies of rebellion: how the end of the Cold War shaped internal conflict. . Am. Political Sci. Rev. 104:(3):41529
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  45. Keck ME, Sikkink K. 1989.. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY:: Cornell Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Korman S. 1996.. The Right of Conquest: The Acquisition of Territory by Force in International Law and Practice. Oxford, UK:: Clarendon
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Lacina B, Gleditsch NP. 2005.. Monitoring trends in global combat: a new dataset of battle deaths. . Eur. J. Popul. 21::14566
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  48. Lacina B, Gleditsch NP, Russett B. 2006.. The declining risk of death in battle. . Int. Stud. Q. 50::67380
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  49. Lake DE. 1992.. Powerful pacifists: democratic states and war. . Am. Political Sci. Rev. 86:(1):2437
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  50. Lemke D, Crabtree C. 2020.. Territorial contenders in world politics. . J. Confl. Resolut. 64:(2/3):51844
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  51. Lyall J. 2020.. Replication Data for Divided Armies. Cambridge, MA:: Harvard Dataverse
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Mansfield ED, Snyder J. 1995.. Democratization and the danger of war. . Int. Secur. 20:(1):538
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  53. Mueller J. 1989.. Retreat from Doomsday: The Obsolescence of Major War. New York:: Basic Books
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Oka RC, Kissel M, Golitko M, Sheridan SG, Kim NC, Fuentes A. 2017.. Population is the main driver of war group size and conflict casualties. . PNAS 114:(52):E1110110
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  55. Organski AFK, Kugler J. 1980.. The War Ledger. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Pinker S. 2011.. The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined. New York:: Viking
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Pinker S. 2018.. Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress. New York:: Viking
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Ray JL. 1998.. Does democracy cause peace?. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 1::2746
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  59. Reiter D, Stam AC. 2002.. Democracies at War. Princeton, NJ:: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Richardson LF. 1960.. Statistics of Deadly Quarrels. Chicago: Quadrangle:
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Risse T, Ropp SC, Sikkink K, eds. 1999.. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Risse T, Ropp SC, Sikkink K, eds. 2013.. The Persistent Power of Human Rights: From Commitment to Compliance. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Risse T, Sikkink K. 1999.. The socialization of international human rights norms into domestic practices: introduction. . See Risse et al. 1999 , pp. 138
  64. Roth R. 2018.. Does Better Angels of Our Nature hold up as history?. Hist. Reflect. 44:(1):91103
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  65. Russett BM. 1995.. Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post–Cold War World. Princeton, NJ:: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Sandholtz W. 2007.. Prohibiting Plunder: How Norms Change. New York:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Sandholtz W, Stiles KW. 2009.. International Norms and Cycles of Change. New York:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Sarkees MR, Wayman FW. 2010.. Resort to War: 1816–2007. Washington, DC:: CQ
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Sikkink K. 2011.. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics. New York:: Norton
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Simmons BA. 2009.. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Snyder G. 1965.. The balance of power and the balance of terror. . In Balance of Power, ed. P Seabury , pp. 184201. San Francisco, CA:: Chandler
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Spagat M, van Weezel S. 2020.. The decline of war since 1950: new evidence. . In Lewis Fry Richardson: His Intellectual Legacy and Influence in the Social Sciences, ed. NP Gleditsch , pp. 12942. Berlin:: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Suri J. 2003.. The early Cold War. . In A Companion to American Foreign Relations, ed. RD Schulzinger , pp. 21529. Malden, MA:: Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Themnér L. 2016.. UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset Codebook. Uppsala, Swed./Oslo:: Uppsala Confl. Data Prog. Cent. Study Civ. Wars/Int. Peace Res. Inst. Oslo
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Thompson WR, Tucker R. 1997.. A tale of two democratic peace critiques. . J. Confl. Resolut. 41:(3):42854
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  76. Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1973.. Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. . Cogn. Psychol. 5::20732
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  77. Vasquez JA. 1993.. The War Puzzle. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Voeten E. 2021.. Ideology and International Institutions. Princeton, NJ:: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Vreeland JA, Dreher A. 2014.. The Political Economy of the United Nations Security Council: Money and Influence. New York:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Waltz KN. 1979.. Theory of International Politics. New York:: McGraw-Hill
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Weeks J. 2014.. Dictators at War and Peace. Ithaca, NY:: Cornell Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Wiener A. 2018.. Contestation and Constitution of Norms in Global International Relations. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Zacher MW. 2001.. The territorial integrity norm: international boundaries and the use of force. . Int. Organ. 55:(2):21550
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041923-115351
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041923-115351
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error