1932

Abstract

Public opinion is increasingly at the heart of both political and scholarly debates on European integration. This article reviews the large literature on public support for, and opposition to, European integration, focusing on conceptualization, causes, and consequences: What is public support for European integration? How can we explain variation in support and Euroskepticism? What are the consequences of public support for elections and policy making in the European Union? The review reveals that although a growing literature has sought to explain individual support for European integration, more work is needed to understand the ways in which opinions are shaped by their national context and how increasing public contestation of the European Union poses a challenge to, and an opportunity for, the future of the integration project.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-042214-044157
2016-05-11
2024-04-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/19/1/annurev-polisci-042214-044157.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-042214-044157&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Anderson CJ. 1998. When in doubt use proxies: attitudes to domestic politics and support for the EU. Comp. Polit. Stud. 31:569–601 [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson CJ, Kaltenthaler KC. 1996. The dynamics of public opinion toward European integration, 1973–93. Eur. J. Int. Relat. 2:2175–99 [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson CJ, Reichert MS. 1995. Economic benefits and support for membership in the E.U.: a cross-national analysis. J. Public Policy 15:3231–49 [Google Scholar]
  4. Arnold C, Franklin M, Wlezien C. 2015. Public opinion and European public policy: how measurement matters Unpublished manuscript
  5. Aspinwall M. 2002. Preferring Europe: ideology and national preference on European integration. Eur. Union Polit. 3:181–111 [Google Scholar]
  6. Aspinwall M. 2007. Government preferences in European integration: an empirical test of five theories. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 37:189–114 [Google Scholar]
  7. Azrout R, van Spanje J, De Vreese CH. 2012. When news matters: media effects on public support for EU enlargement in 21 countries. J. Common Mark. Stud. 50:691–708 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bailer S, Mattila M, Schneider G. 2014. Money makes the EU go round: the objective foundations of conflict in the Council of Ministers. J. Common Mark. Stud. 53:3437–56 [Google Scholar]
  9. Banducci S, Karp JA, Loedel PH. 2009. Economic interests and public support for the euro. J. Eur. Public Policy 16:4564–81 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bechtel M, Hainmueller J, Margalit Y. 2014. Preferences for international redistribution: the divide over the Eurozone bailouts. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 58:4835–56 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bechtel M, Scheve K. 2013. Mass support for climate change depends on institutional design. PNAS 110:1313763–68 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bølstad J. 2015. Dynamics of European integration: public opinion in the core and periphery. Eur. Union Polit. 16:123–44 [Google Scholar]
  13. Boomgaarden HG, Schuck ART, Elenbaas M, De Vreese CH. 2011. Mapping EU attitudes: conceptual and empirical dimensions of Euroscepticism and EU support. Eur. Union Polit. 12:2241–66 [Google Scholar]
  14. Brinegar A, Jolly S. 2005. Location, location, location: national contextual factors and public support for European integration. Eur. Union Polit. 6:2155–80 [Google Scholar]
  15. Brinegar A, Jolly S, Kitschelt S. 2004. Varieties of capitalism and political divides over European integration. European Integration and Political Conflict G Marks, M Steenbergen 62–89 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  16. Bruter M. 2003. Winning hearts and minds for Europe: the impact of news and symbols on civic and cultural European identity. Comp. Polit. Stud. 36:101148–79 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bruter M. 2005. Citizens of Europe? The Emergence of a Mass European Identity London: Palgrave Macmillan
  18. Burgoon B. 2009. Social nation and social Europe: support for national and supranational welfare compensation in Europe. Eur. Union Polit. 10:4427–55 [Google Scholar]
  19. Carey S. 2002. Undivided loyalties: Is national identity an obstacle to European integration?. Eur. Union Polit. 3:4387–413 [Google Scholar]
  20. Carrubba CJ. 1997. Net financial transfers in the European Union: Who gets what and why?. J. Polit. 59:2469–96 [Google Scholar]
  21. Clark N, Rohrschneider R. 2009. Second-order elections versus first-order thinking: how voters perceive the representation process in a multi-layered system of governance. Eur. Integrat. 31:5613–32 [Google Scholar]
  22. Cramme O, Hobolt SB. 2014. Democratic Politics in a European Union Under Stress Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  23. De Vreese C. 2003. Framing Europe: Television News and European Integration Amsterdam: Aksant Acad. Publ.
  24. De Vreese CH, Boomgaarden HG. 2005. Projecting EU referendums: fear of immigration and support for European integration. Eur. Union Polit. 6:159–82 [Google Scholar]
  25. De Vreese CH, Boomgaarden HG. 2006. Media effects on public opinion about the enlargement of the European Union. J. Common Mark. Stud. 44:2419–36 [Google Scholar]
  26. De Vries CE. 2007. Sleeping giant: fact or fairytale? How European integration affects national elections. Eur. Union Polit. 8:3363–85 [Google Scholar]
  27. De Vries CE. 2010. EU issue voting: asset or liability? How European integration affects parties' electoral fortunes. Eur. Union Polit. 1:1189–117 [Google Scholar]
  28. De Vries CE, Edwards E. 2009. Taking Europe to its extremes: extremist parties and public Euroskepticism. Party Polit. 15:15–28 [Google Scholar]
  29. De Vries CE, Hobolt SB. 2012. When dimensions collide: the electoral success of issue entrepreneurs. Eur. Union Polit. 13:2246–68 [Google Scholar]
  30. De Vries CE, Steenbergen MR. 2013. Variable opinions: the predictability of support for unification in mass European publics. J. Polit. Mark. 12:1121–41 [Google Scholar]
  31. De Vries CE, Van der Brug W, Van Egmond MH, Van der Eijk C. 2011. Individual and contextual variation in EU issue voting: the role of political information. Elect. Stud. 30:116–28 [Google Scholar]
  32. Wilde P, Trenz HJ. De 2012. Denouncing European integration: Euroscepticism as policy contestation. Eur. J. Soc. Theory 15:4537–54 [Google Scholar]
  33. Easton D. 1965. A Framework for Political Analysis Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
  34. Easton D. 1975. A re-assessment of the concept of political support. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 5:4435–57 [Google Scholar]
  35. Eichenberg RC, Dalton RJ. 1993. Europeans and the European Community: the dynamics of public support for European integration. Int. Organ. 47:4507–34 [Google Scholar]
  36. Evans G. 1998. Euroscepticism and conservative electoral support: how an asset became a liability. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 284:573–90 [Google Scholar]
  37. Finke D. 2010. European Integration and Its Limits: Intergovernmental Conflicts and Their Domestic Origins London: ECPR Press
  38. Franklin MN, Marsh M, McLaren L. 1994. The European question: opposition to unification in the wake of Maastricht. J. Common Mark. Stud. 35:455–72 [Google Scholar]
  39. Franklin MN, Van der Eijk C, Marsh M. 1995. Referendum outcomes and trust in government: public support for Europe in the wake of Maastricht. West Eur. Polit. 18:3101–17 [Google Scholar]
  40. Franklin MN, Wlezien C. 1997. The responsive public: issue salience, policy change, and preferences for European unification. J. Theor. Polit. 9:3347–63 [Google Scholar]
  41. Gabel MJ. 1998. Interest and Integration: Market Liberalization, Public Opinion and European Union. Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
  42. Gabel MJ, Hix S. 2005. Understanding public support for British membership of the single currency. Polit. Stud. 53:165–81 [Google Scholar]
  43. Gabel MJ, Palmer HD. 1995. Understanding variation in public support for European integration. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 27:3–19 [Google Scholar]
  44. Gabel MJ, Scheve K. 2007. Estimating the effect of elite communications on public opinion using instrumental variables. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 51:41013–1028 [Google Scholar]
  45. Garry J, Tilley J. 2009. The macro economic factors conditioning the impact of identity on attitudes towards the EU. Eur. Union Polit. 10:3361–79 [Google Scholar]
  46. Garry J, Tilley J. 2015. Inequality, state ownership and the EU: how economic context and economic ideology shape support for the EU. Eur. Union Polit. 16:1139–54 [Google Scholar]
  47. Green-Pedersen C. 2012. A giant fast asleep? Party incentives and the politicisation of European integration. Polit. Stud. 60:1115–30 [Google Scholar]
  48. Haas EB. 1958. The Uniting of Europe Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  49. Hakhverdian A, Van Elsas E, Van Der Brug W, Kuhn T. 2013. Euroscepticism and education: a longitudinal study of 12 EU member states. Eur. Union Polit. 14:4522–41 [Google Scholar]
  50. Harteveld E, De Vries CE, Van der Meer T. 2013. In Europe we trust? Exploring three logics of trust in the European Union. Eur. Union Polit. 14:4542–65 [Google Scholar]
  51. Hellström J. 2008. Who leads, who follows? Re-examining the party-electorate linkages on European integration. J. Eur. Public Policy 15:81127–44 [Google Scholar]
  52. Hix S, Marsh M. 2007. Punishment or protest? Understanding European Parliament elections. J. Polit. 69:2495–510 [Google Scholar]
  53. Hobolt SB. 2007. Taking cues on Europe? Voter competence and party endorsements in referendums on European integration. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 46:2151–82 [Google Scholar]
  54. Hobolt SB. 2009. Europe in Question: Referendums on European Integration Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  55. Hobolt SB. 2014. Ever closer or ever wider? Public attitudes towards further enlargement and integration in the European Union. J. Eur. Public Policy 21:5664–80 [Google Scholar]
  56. Hobolt SB. 2015. The 2014 European Parliament elections: divided in unity?. J. Common Mark. Stud. 53:6–21 [Google Scholar]
  57. Hobolt SB, Brouard S. 2011. Contesting the European Union? Why the Dutch and the French rejected the European constitution. Polit. Res. Q. 64:2309–22 [Google Scholar]
  58. Hobolt SB, De Vries CE. 2015. Issue entrepreneurship and multiparty competition. Comp. Polit. Stud. 48:91159–85 [Google Scholar]
  59. Hobolt SB, Leblond P. 2009. Is my crown better than your euro? Exchange rates and public opinion on the European single currency. Eur. Union Polit. 10:2209–32 [Google Scholar]
  60. Hobolt SB, Leblond P. 2013. Economic insecurity and public support for the euro before and during the financial crisis. Mass Politics in Tough Times: Opinions, Votes and Protest in the Great Recession N Bermeo, LM Bartels 128–47 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  61. Hobolt SB, Spoon J-J. 2012. Motivating the European voter: parties, issues and campaigns in European Parliament elections. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 51:6701–27 [Google Scholar]
  62. Hobolt SB, Spoon J-J, Tilley J. 2009. A vote against Europe? Explaining defection at the 1999 and 2004 European Parliament elections. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 39:193–115 [Google Scholar]
  63. Hobolt SB, Tilley J. 2014. Blaming Europe? Responsibility Without Accountability in the European Union Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  64. Hobolt SB, Van der Brug W, De Vreese CH, Boomgaarden HG, Hinrichsen MC. 2011. Religious intolerance and Euroscepticism. Eur. Union Polit. 12:3359–79 [Google Scholar]
  65. Hobolt SB, Wratil C. 2015. Public opinion and the crisis: the dynamics of support for the euro. J. Eur. Public Policy 22:2238–56 [Google Scholar]
  66. Holsti OR. 1992. Public opinion and foreign policy: challenges to the Almond-Lippmann consensus. Int. Stud. Q. 36:439–66 [Google Scholar]
  67. Hooghe L. 2003. Europe divided? Elites versus public opinion on European integration. Eur. Union Polit. 4:3281–304 [Google Scholar]
  68. Hooghe L. 2007. What drives Euroskepticism? Party-public cueing, ideology and strategic opportunity. Eur. Union Polit. 8:15–12 [Google Scholar]
  69. Hooghe L, Marks G. 2001. Multi-Level Governance and European Integration Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
  70. Hooghe L, Marks G. 2004. Does identity or economic rationality drive public opinion on European integration?. PS: Polit. Sci. Polit. 37:3415–20 [Google Scholar]
  71. Hooghe L, Marks G. 2005. Calculation, community and cues: public opinion on European integration. Eur. Union Polit. 6:4419–43 [Google Scholar]
  72. Hooghe L, Marks G. 2009. A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 39:11–23 [Google Scholar]
  73. Hooghe L, Marks G, Wilson CJ. 2002. Does left/right structure party positions on European integration?. Comp. Polit. Stud. 35:965–89 [Google Scholar]
  74. Inglehart R. 1970. Cognitive mobilization and European identity. Comp. Polit. 3:145–70 [Google Scholar]
  75. Kaltenthaler KC, Anderson C. 2001. Europeans and their money: explaining public support for the common European currency. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 40:2139–70 [Google Scholar]
  76. Karp JA, Banducci SA, Bowler S. 2003. To know it is to love it: satisfaction with democracy in the European Union. Comp. Polit. Stud. 36:3271–92 [Google Scholar]
  77. Kayser MA, Peress M. 2012. Benchmarking across borders: electoral accountability and the necessity of comparison. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 106:3661–84 [Google Scholar]
  78. Koenig-Archibugi M. 2004. Explaining government preferences for institutional change in EU foreign and security policy. Int. Organ. 58:4137–74 [Google Scholar]
  79. Kritzinger S. 2003. The influence of the nation-state on individual support for the European Union. Eur. Union Polit. 4:219–41 [Google Scholar]
  80. Kuhn T, Stoeckel F. 2014. When European integration becomes costly: the Euro crisis and public support for European economic governance. J. Eur. Public Policy 21:4624–41 [Google Scholar]
  81. Leconte L. 2010. Understanding Euroscepticism London: Palgrave Macmillan
  82. Lindberg L, Scheingold S. 1970. Europe's Would-Be Polity Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
  83. Mair P. 2000. The limited impact of Europe on national party systems. West Eur. Polit. 23:427–51 [Google Scholar]
  84. Mair P. 2007. Political opposition and the European Union. Gov. Oppos. 42:11–17 [Google Scholar]
  85. Marks G, Steenbergen MR. 2002. Understanding political contestation in the European Union. Comp. Polit. Stud. 35:8879–92 [Google Scholar]
  86. Marsh M. 1998. Testing the second-order election model after four European elections. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 28:4591–607 [Google Scholar]
  87. McLaren L. 2002. Public support for the European Union: cost/benefit analysis or perceived cultural threat?. J. Polit. 64:2551–66 [Google Scholar]
  88. McLaren L. 2006. Identity, Interests and Attitudes to European Integration London: Palgrave Macmillan
  89. McLaren L. 2007. Explaining opposition to Turkish membership of the EU. Eur. Union Polit. 8:2251–78 [Google Scholar]
  90. Mendez F, Mendez M, Triga V. 2014. Referendums and the European Union: A Comparative Inquiry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  91. Milner HV, Tingley D. 2013. The choice for multilateralism: foreign aid and American foreign policy. Rev. Int. Organ. 8:313–41 [Google Scholar]
  92. Müller W, Jenny M, Ecker A. 2012. The elites–masses gap in European integration. The Elites of Europe: A Study into the Europeaness of Europe's Political and Economic Elites H Best 167–81 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  93. Norris P. 1999. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  94. Reif K, Schmitt H. 1980. Nine second-order national elections: a conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 8:13–44 [Google Scholar]
  95. Rohrschneider R. 2000. The democracy deficit and mass support for an EU-wide government. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 46:2463–75 [Google Scholar]
  96. Rohrschneider R, Loveless M. 2010. Macro-salience: how economic and political contexts mediate popular evaluations of the democracy deficit in the European Union. J. Polit. 72:41029–45 [Google Scholar]
  97. Sánchez-Cuenca I. 2000. The political basis of support for European integration. Eur. Union Polit. 1:2147–71 [Google Scholar]
  98. Scharpf FW. 1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  99. Schneider G, Weitsman PA. 1996. The punishment trap: integration referendums as popularity contests. Comp. Polit. Stud. 28:4582–607 [Google Scholar]
  100. Schoen H. 2008. Turkey's bid for EU membership, contrasting views of public opinion, and vote choice: evidence from the 2005 German federal election. Elect. Stud. 27:2344–55 [Google Scholar]
  101. Schuck A, De Vreese CH. 2006. Between risk and opportunity: news framing and its effects on public support for EU enlargement. Eur. J. Commun. 21:15–32 [Google Scholar]
  102. Siune K, Svensson P. 1993. The Danes and the Maastricht Treaty: The Danish EC Referendum of June 1992. Elect. Stud. 12:299–111 [Google Scholar]
  103. Siune K, Svensson P, Tonsgaard O. 1994. The European Union. The Danes said “no” in 1992 but “yes” in 1993: how and why?. Elect. Stud. 13:2107–16 [Google Scholar]
  104. Spoon J-J. 2012. How salient is Europe? An analysis of European election manifestos, 1979–2004. Eur. Union Polit. 13:4558–79 [Google Scholar]
  105. Steenbergen MR, Edwards EE, De Vries CE. 2007. Who's cueing whom? Mass-elite linkages and the future of European integration. Eur. Union Polit. 8:113–35 [Google Scholar]
  106. Stöckel F. 2013. Ambivalent or indifferent? Reconsidering the structure of EU public opinion. Eur. Union Polit. 14:123–45 [Google Scholar]
  107. Taggart P. 1998. A touchstone of dissent: Euroscepticism in contemporary Western European party systems. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 33:3363–88 [Google Scholar]
  108. Tillman ER. 2004. The European Union at the ballot box? European integration and voting behavior in the new member states. Comp. Polit. Stud. 37:5590–610 [Google Scholar]
  109. Tillman ER. 2012. Support for the euro, political knowledge, and voting behavior in the 2001 and 2005 UK general election. Eur. Union Polit. 13:367–89 [Google Scholar]
  110. Toshkov D. 2011. Public opinion and policy output in the European Union: a lost relationship. Eur. Union Polit. 12:2169–91 [Google Scholar]
  111. Treib O. 2014. The voter says no, but nobody listens: causes and consequences of the Eurosceptic vote in the 2014 European elections. J. Eur. Public Policy 21:101541–54 [Google Scholar]
  112. Tucker JA, Pacek AC, Berinsky AJ. 2002. Transitional winners and losers: attitudes toward EU membership in post-communist countries. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 46:3557–71 [Google Scholar]
  113. Van de Wardt M, De Vries CE, Hobolt SB. 2014. Exploiting the cracks: wedge issues in multiparty competition. J. Polit. 76:4986–99 [Google Scholar]
  114. Van der Eijk C, Franklin M. 1996. Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
  115. Van der Eijk C, Franklin MN. 2004. Potential for contestation on European matters at national elections in Europe. European Integration and Political Conflict G Marks, MR Steenbergen 33–50 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  116. Van der Eijk C, Franklin MN. 2007. The sleeping giant: potential for political mobilization of disaffection with European integration. European Elections & Domestic Politics: Lessons from the Past and Scenarios for the Future W Van der Brug, C Van der Eijk 189–208 Notre Dame, IN: Univ. Notre Dame Press [Google Scholar]
  117. Van Elsas E, van der Brug W. 2015. The changing relationship between left-right ideology and Euroscepticism, 1973–2010. Eur. Union Polit. 16:2194–215 [Google Scholar]
  118. Vliegenthart R, Schuck A, Boomgaarden HG, De Vreese CH. 2009. News coverage and support for European integration, 1990–2006. Int. J. Public Opin. Res. 20:4415–39 [Google Scholar]
  119. Weßels B. 1995. Evaluations of the EC: elite or mass-driven?. Public Opinion and International Governance O Niedermayer, R Sinnott 105–36 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  120. Wlezien C. 1995. The public as thermostat: dynamics of preferences for spending. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 39:981–1000 [Google Scholar]
  121. Worre T. 1995. First no, then yes: the Danish referendums on the Maastricht Treaty 1992 and 1993. J. Common Mark. Stud. 33:2235–57 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-042214-044157
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-042214-044157
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error