1932

Abstract

What do we know about wealth inequality and democracy? Our review shows that the simple conjectures that democracy produces wealth equality and that wealth inequality leads to democratic failure are not supported by the evidence. Why are democracy and high levels of wealth inequality sustainable together? Three key features of democratic politics can make this outcome possible. When societies are divided along cleavages other than wealth, this can inhibit the adoption of wealth-equalizing policies. Likewise, voter preferences for the redistribution of wealth depend on the beliefs they form about the fairness of these measures, and some voters without wealth may feel that redistribution is unfair. Finally, wealth-equalizing policies may be absent if the democratic process is captured by the rich; however, the evidence explaining when, where, and why capture accounts for variation in wealth inequality is less convincing than is often claimed. This phenomenon is a useful avenue for future research.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-061014-101840
2017-05-11
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/20/1/annurev-polisci-061014-101840.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-061014-101840&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson J. 2002. Reversal of fortune: geography and institutions in the making of the modern world income distribution. Q. J. Econ. 117:1231–94 [Google Scholar]
  2. Acemoglu D, Naidu S, Restrepo P, Robinson J. 2015. Democracy, redistribution, and inequality. Handb. Income Distrib. 2:1885–966 [Google Scholar]
  3. Acemoglu D, Robinson J. 2000. Why did the West extend the franchise? Democracy, inequality, and growth in historical perspective. Q. J. Econ. 115:1167–99 [Google Scholar]
  4. Acemoglu D, Robinson J. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  5. Acemoglu D, Robinson J. 2015. The rise and decline of general laws of capitalism. J. Econ. Perspect. 29:3–28 [Google Scholar]
  6. Aghion P, Persson T, Rouzet D. 2012. Education and military rivalry NBER Work. Pap. No.18049. Natl. Bur. Econ. Res., Washington, DC
  7. Albertus M. 2015. Autocracy and Redistribution: The Politics of Land Reform New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  8. Ansell B, Samuels D. 2014. Inequality and Democratization: An Elite Competition Approach New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  9. Arroyo Abad L. 2013. Persistent inequality? Trade, factor endowments, and inequality in republican Latin America. J. Econ. Hist. 73:138–78 [Google Scholar]
  10. Ballard-Rosa C, Martin L, Scheve K. 2017. The structure of American income tax policy preferences. J. Polit. 79:11–16 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bartels L. 2008. Unequal Democracy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  12. Bénabou R, Tirole J. 2006. Belief in a just world and redistributive politics. Q. J. Econ. 121:699–746 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bendix R, Rokkan S. 1962. The extension of national citizenship to the lower classes: a comparative perspective Presented at World Congr. Sociol., 5th, Washington, DC
  14. Benhabib J, Bisin A. 2016. Skewed wealth distributions: theory and empirics Work. pap., New York Univ.
  15. Benhabib J, Bisin A, Zhu S. 2011. The distribution of wealth and fiscal policy in economies with finitely lived agents. Econometrica 79:123–57 [Google Scholar]
  16. Boix C. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  17. Boix C. 2015. Political Order and Inequality New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  18. Boix C, Miller M, Rosato S. 2012. A complete data set of political regimes. 1800–2007 Comp. Polit. Stud. 20:1–32 [Google Scholar]
  19. Cavaille C, Trump K-S. 2015. The two facets of social policy preferences. J. Polit. 77:1146–60 [Google Scholar]
  20. Coatsworth J. 2008. Inequality, institutions, and economic growth in Latin America. J. Latin Am. Stud. 40:545–69 [Google Scholar]
  21. Dahl R. 1958. A critique of the ruling elite model. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 52:463–69 [Google Scholar]
  22. Durante R, Putterman L, van der Weele J. 2014. Preferences for redistribution and perceptions of fairness: an experimental study. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 12:1059–86 [Google Scholar]
  23. Eggers AC, Hainmueller J. 2009. MPs for sale? Returns to office in postwar British politics. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 103:4513–33 [Google Scholar]
  24. Engerman SL, Sokoloff KL. 1997. Factor endowments, institutions, and differential paths of growth among new world economies. How Latin America Fell Behind ed. S Haber 260–304 Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  25. Engerman SL, Sokoloff KL. 2000. Institutions, factor endowments, and paths of development in the new world. J. Econ. Perspect. 14:217–32 [Google Scholar]
  26. Faccio M. 2006. Politically connected firms. Am. Econ. Rev. 96:1369–86 [Google Scholar]
  27. Farhi E, Werning I. 2014. Bequest taxation and r-g Work. pap., Dep. Econ., Harvard Univ.
  28. Fisman R, Jakiela P, Kariv S. 2014. The distributional preferences of Americans? NBER Work. Pap. No. 20145, Natl. Bur. Econ. Res., Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  29. Fong C. 2001. Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistribution. J. Public Econ. 82:225–46 [Google Scholar]
  30. Frank Z. 2005. Wealth holding in southeastern Brazil, 1815–1860. Hisp. Am. Hist. Rev. 85:221–55 [Google Scholar]
  31. Frankema E. 2008. The historical evolution of inequality in Latin America: a comparative analysis, 1870–2000 Unpublished PhD thesis, Univ. Groningen
  32. Frankema E. 2010. The colonial roots of land inequality: geography, factor endowments, or institutions?. Econ. Hist. Rev. 63:418–51 [Google Scholar]
  33. Gilens M. Princeton NJ. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America Princeton Univ. Press/Russell Sage Found.
  34. Haggard S, Kaufman R. 2012. Inequality and regime change: democratic transitions and the stability of democratic rule. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 106:495–516 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hochschild J. 1986. What's Fair? Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  36. Johnson L, Frank Z. 2006. Cities and wealth in the South Atlantic: Buenos Aires and Rio de Janeiro before 1860. Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist. 48:664 [Google Scholar]
  37. Jones C. 2015. Pareto and Piketty: The macroeconomics of top income and wealth inequality. J. Econ. Perspect. 29:29–46 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kopczuk W. 2015. What do we know about the evolution of top wealth shares in the United States?. J. Econ. Perspect. 2:47–66 [Google Scholar]
  39. Lane R. 1959. Fear of equality. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 53:35–51 [Google Scholar]
  40. Lindblom C. 1982. The market as prison. J. Polit. 44:324–32 [Google Scholar]
  41. Lipset SM, Rokkan S. 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments New York: Free Press
  42. Mares I, Queralt D. 2015. The non-democratic origins of income taxation. Comp. Polit. Stud.1–36
  43. McCall L. 2013. The Undeserving Rich: Beliefs about Inequality, Opportunity, and Redistribution in American Society Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  44. Mills CW. 1956. The Power Elite Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  45. Piketty T. 1995. Social mobility and redistributive politics. Q. J. Econ. 110:551–84 [Google Scholar]
  46. Piketty T. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  47. Przeworski A, Alvarez M, Cheibub JA, Limongi F. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  48. Przeworski A, Wallerstein M. 1988. Structural dependence of the state on capital. 82:11–29 [Google Scholar]
  49. Roemer J. 1998. Why the poor do not expropriate the rich: an old argument in new garb. J. Public Econ. 70:399–424 [Google Scholar]
  50. Roine J, Waldenstrom D. 2015. Long-run trends in the distribution of income and wealth. Handbook of Income Distribution AB Atkinson, F Bourguignon 2469–592 Amsterdam: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
  51. Rosanvallon P. 1992. Le Sacre du Citoyen: Histoire du Suffrage Universel en France. Paris: Gallimard
  52. Russett B. 1964. Inequality and instability: the relationship of land tenure to politics. World Polit. 16:442–54 [Google Scholar]
  53. Saez E, Zucman G. 2016. Wealth inequality in the United States since 1913: evidence from capitalized income tax data. Q. J. Econ. 131:519–77 [Google Scholar]
  54. Scheve K, Stasavage D. 2016. Taxing the Rich: A History of Fiscal Fairness in the United States and Europe Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press/Russell Sage Found.
  55. Shayo M. 2009. A model of social identity with an application to political economy: nation, class, and redistribution. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 103:147–74 [Google Scholar]
  56. Sokoloff K, Zolt EM. 2006. Inequality and taxation: evidence from the Americas on how inequality may influence tax institutions. Tax Law Rev. 59:2167–242 [Google Scholar]
  57. Soltow L. 1975. Men and Wealth in the United States, 1850–1870 New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  58. Steckel R. 1994. Census manuscript schedules matched with property tax lists: a source of information on long-term trends in wealth inequality. Hist. Methods 27:71–85 [Google Scholar]
  59. Truex R. 2014. The returns to office in a “rubber stamp” parliament. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 108:2235–51 [Google Scholar]
  60. Turner JD. 2010. Wealth concentration in the European periphery: Ireland 1858–2001. Oxford Econ. Pap. 62:625–46 [Google Scholar]
  61. Williamson J. 2015. Latin American inequality: colonial origins, commodity booms, or a missed 20th century leveling. J. Hum. Dev. Capab. 16:324–41 [Google Scholar]
  62. Winters J, Page B. 2009. Oligarchy in the United States?. Perspect. Polit. 7:4731–51 [Google Scholar]
  63. Ziblatt D. 2008. Does landholding inequality block democratization?. World Polit. 58:311–38 [Google Scholar]
  64. Ziblatt D. 2009. Shaping democratic practice and the causes of electoral fraud: the case of nineteenth century Germany. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 103:1–21 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-061014-101840
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-061014-101840
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error