1932
0

Annual Review of Political Science

Volume 21, 2018

Political Theories of Migration

Abstract

The topic of migration raises important and challenging normative questions about the legitimacy of state power, the boundaries of political membership, and justice within and across state borders. States exercise power over borders, but what, if anything, justifies this power? Is it morally permissible for liberal democratic states to prevent their citizens from exiting the country and exclude prospective migrants from entering? If liberal democratic states are justified in excluding some and accepting others, how should they decide whom to admit? This review examines how contemporary political theorists and philosophers have answered these questions. First, I examine the conventional view that says states have the right to control immigration; second, I discuss arguments for open borders. The third section examines critique of open borders, and the fourth section considers more recent arguments that have been advanced in favor of the conventional view. I conclude with some suggestions for future research.

Keyword(s): borders, emigration, immigration, migration, refugees
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-082317-093019
2018-05-11
2025-06-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/21/1/annurev-polisci-082317-093019.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-082317-093019&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abizadeh A 2008. Democratic theory and border coercion: no right to unilaterally control your own borders. Political Theory 36:137–65
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bartley RL 2001. Thinking things over: open NAFTA borders? Why not?. Wall Street J July 2. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB994028904620983237
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Blake M 2001. Distributive justice, state coercion, and autonomy. Philos. Public Aff. 30:3257–96
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Blake M 2002. Discretionary immigration. Philos. Top. 30:2273–89
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Blake M 2005. Immigration. A Companion to Applied Ethics RG Frey, CH Wellman 224–37 Malden, MA: Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Blake M 2013. Immigration, jurisdiction, and exclusion. Philos. Public Aff. 41:2103–30
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Borjas G 2014. Immigration Economics Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Brock G, Blake M 2015. Debating Brain Drain: May Governments Restrict Emigration? Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Caney S 2001. Cosmopolitan justice and equalizing opportunities. Metaphilosophy 32:113–34
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Card D, Peri G 2016. Immigration Economics by George Borjas: a review. J. Econ. Lit. 54:41333–49
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Carens J 1987. Aliens and citizens: the case for open borders. Rev. Politics 49:2251–73
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Carens J 1992. Migration and morality: a liberal egalitarian perspective. Free Movement: Ethical Issues in the Transnational Migration of People and of Money B Barry, RE Goodin 25–47 University Park, PA: Penn. State Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Carens J 2013. The Ethics of Immigration Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Clemens M 2011. Economics and emigration: trillion-dollar bills on the sidewalk?. J. Econ. Perspect. 25:383–106
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Cohen J 2006. Is there a human right to democracy. The Egalitarian Conscience: Essays in Honour of G.A. Cohen C Sypnowich 227–50 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Cole P 2000. Philosophies of Exclusion: Liberal Political Theory and Immigration Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Crovitz GL 2014. In praise of huddled masses (cont'd). Wall Street J July 6. https://www.wsj.com/articles/gordon-crovitz-in-praise-of-huddled-masses-contd-1404683839
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Fine S 2013. The ethics of immigration: self-determination and the right to exclude. Philos. Compass 8:3254–68
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Gibney MJ 2015. Refugees and justice between states. Eur. J. Political Theory 14:4448–63
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Hainmueller J, Bansak K, Hangartner D 2016. How economic, humanitarian, and religious concerns shape European attitudes toward asylum seekers. Science 354:6309217–22
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Hainmueller J, Bansak K, Hangartner D 2017. Europeans support a proportional allocation of asylum seekers. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1:0133
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Huntington S 2005. Who Are We? The Challenges to America's National Identity New York: Simon & Schuster
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Hobbes T 1994. The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic ed. JCA Gaskin Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Lister M 2013. Who are refugees?. Law Philos 32:645–71
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Locke J 1980. Second Treatise of Government CB Macpherson Indianapolis: Hackett
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Miller D 1995. On Nationality Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Miller D 2014. Immigration: the case for limits. Contemporary Debates in Applied Ethics AI Cohen, CH Wellman 193–206 Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Miller D 2016. Strangers in Our Midst: The Political Philosophy of Immigration Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Moellendorf D 2002. Cosmopolitan Justice Boulder, CO: Westview
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Ngai M 2004. Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Oberman K 2016. Immigration as a Human Right. Migration in Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership S Fine, L Ypi 32–56 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Pevnick R 2011. Immigration and the Constraints of Justice: Between Open Borders and Absolute Sovereignty Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Price ME 2009. Rethinking Asylum: History, Purpose, and Limits Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Rawls J 1971. A Theory of Justice Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Renan E 2018 (1882). What is a Nation? and Other Political Writings New York: Columbia Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Rousseau JJ 1987. The social contract. Basic Political Writings DA Cress 139–227 Indianapolis: Hackett
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Sadiq K 2008. Paper Citizens: How Illegal Immigrants Acquire Citizenship in Developing Countries Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Salyer L 1995. Laws Harsh as Tigers: Chinese Immigrants and the Shaping of Modern Immigration Law Chapel Hill: Univ. North Carolina Press
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Shachar A 2009. The Birthright Lottery: Citizenship and Global Inequality Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Shacknove AE 1985. Who is a refugee?. Ethics 95:2274–84
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Simmons AJ 1992. The Lockean Theory of Rights Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Smith R 1997. Civic Ideals: Conflicting Visions of Citizenship in U.S. History New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Song S 2017. Why does the state have the right to control immigration?. NOMOS LVII: Migration, Emigration, and Immigration J Knight 3–50 New York: NYU Press
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Song S 2018. Immigration and Democracy Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Souter J 2014. Towards a theory of asylum as reparation for past injustice. Political Stud 62:2326–42
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Steiner H 1992. Libertarianism and the transnational migration of people. In. Free Movement: Ethical Issues in the Transnational Migration of People and of Money B Barry, RE Goodin 87–94 University Park: Penn. State Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Stilz A 2013. Occupancy rights and the wrong of removal. Philos. Public Aff. 41:4324–56
     [Google Scholar]
  48. United Nations 2016. International migration report 2015 Dep. Econ. Soc. Aff., Popul. Div United Nations New York, NY: http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/publications/migrationreport/docs/MigrationReport2015_Highlights.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  49. UNHCR (United Nations High Commiss. Refugees). 2015. Global Trends: Forced Displacement in 2015 Geneva: UNHCR http://www.unhcr.org/en-us/statistics/unhcrstats/576408cd7/unhcr-global-trends-2015.html
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Waldron J 1992. Superseding historic injustice. Ethics 103:14–28
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Walzer M 1983. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality New York: Basic Books
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Wellman CH 2008. Immigration and freedom of association. Ethics 119:1109–41
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Wellman CH 2011. In defense of the right to exclude. Debating the Ethics of Immigration: Is There a Right to Exclude?13–56 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  54. White S 1997. Freedom of association and the right to exclude. J. Political Philos. 5:4373–91
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Young IM 2004. Responsibility and global labor justice. J. Political Philos. 12:4365–88
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Young IM 2011. Responsibility for Justice Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-082317-093019
Loading

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error