1932

Abstract

Human infants are involved in communicative interactions with others well before they start to speak or understand language. It is generally thought that this communication is useful for establishing interpersonal relations and supporting joint activities, but, in the absence of symbolic functions that language provides, these early communicative contexts do not allow infants to learn about the world. However, recent studies suggest that when someone demonstrates something using an object as the medium of instruction, infants can conceive the object as an exemplar of the whole class of objects of the same kind. Thus, an object, just like a word, can play the role of a symbol that stands for something else than itself, and infants can learn general knowledge about a kind of object from nonverbal communication about a single item of that kind. This rudimentary symbolic capacity may be one of the roots of the development of symbolic understanding in children.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015232
2015-01-03
2024-06-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/psych/66/1/annurev-psych-010814-015232.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015232&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Akhtar N. 2005. The robustness of learning through overhearing. Dev. Sci. 8:2199–209 [Google Scholar]
  2. Behne T, Carpenter M, Tomasello M. 2005. One-year-olds comprehend the communicative intentions behind gestures in a hiding game. Dev. Sci. 8:6492–99 [Google Scholar]
  3. Behne T, Liszkowski U, Carpenter M, Tomasello M. 2012. Twelve-month-olds' comprehension and production of pointing. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 30:3359–75 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bergelson E, Swingley D. 2012. At 6–9 months, human infants know the meanings of many common nouns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109:93253–58 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bloom L. 1973. One Word at a Time: The Use of Single-Word Utterances Before Syntax The Hague: Mouton [Google Scholar]
  6. Butler LP, Markman EM. 2012. Preschoolers use intentional and pedagogical cues to guide inductive inferences and exploration. Child Dev. 83:41416–28 [Google Scholar]
  7. Butler LP, Markman EM. 2013. Preschoolers' ability to navigate communicative interactions in guiding their inductive inferences. Proc. 35th Annu. Meet. Cogn. Sci. Soc., Berlin [Google Scholar]
  8. Butler LP, Markman EM. 2014. Preschoolers use pedagogical cues to guide radical reorganization of category knowledge. Cognition 130:1116–27 [Google Scholar]
  9. Butterworth G, Jarrett N. 1991. What minds have in common is space: spatial mechanisms serving joint visual attention in infancy. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 9:155–72 [Google Scholar]
  10. Carlson GN, Pelletier FJ. 1995. The Generic Book Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen M, Gergely G, Csibra G. 2012. Selective monitoring of object features in communicative contexts by 9-month-olds: increased attention or genericity bias? Presented at XVIII Bienn. Int. Conf. Infant Stud., Minneapolis, Minn. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen M, Volein Á, Gergely G, Csibra G. 2011. Differential effects of communicative presentation on the encoding of visual features versus numerosity of sets of objects in infants. Presented at Bienn. Meet. Soc. Res. Child Dev., Budapest, Hungary [Google Scholar]
  13. Cimpian A, Park J. 2013. Tell me about Pangolins! Evidence that children are motivated to learn about kinds. J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen. 143:146–55 [Google Scholar]
  14. Csibra G. 2010. Recognizing communicative intentions in infancy. Mind Lang. 25:2141–68 [Google Scholar]
  15. Csibra G, Biró S, Koós O, Gergely G. 2003. One-year-old infants use teleological representations of actions productively. Cogn. Sci. 27:1111–33 [Google Scholar]
  16. Csibra G, Gergely G. 2006. Social learning and social cognition: the case for pedagogy. Processes of Change in Brain and Cognitive Development. Attention and Performance XXI Y Munakata, MH Johnson 249–74 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  17. Csibra G, Gergely G. 2009. Natural pedagogy. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13:4148–53 [Google Scholar]
  18. Csibra G, Gergely G. 2011. Natural pedagogy as evolutionary adaptation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 366:15671149–57 [Google Scholar]
  19. Csibra G, Volein A. 2008. Infants can infer the presence of hidden objects from referential gaze information. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 26:11–11 [Google Scholar]
  20. Dapretto M, Bjork EL. 2000. The development of word retrieval abilities in the second year and its relation to early vocabulary growth. Child Dev. 71:3635–48 [Google Scholar]
  21. Daum M, Ulber J, Gredebäck G. 2013. The development of pointing perception in infancy: effects of communicative verbal cues on covert shifts of attention. Dev. Psychol. 49:1898–908 [Google Scholar]
  22. Deák GO, Krasno AM, Triesch J, Lewis J, Sepeta L. 2014. Watch the hands: Infants can learn to follow gaze by seeing adults manipulate objects. Dev. Sci. 17:2270–81 [Google Scholar]
  23. Deligianni F, Senju A, Gergely G, Csibra G. 2011. Automated gaze-contingent objects elicit orientation following in 8-month-old infants. Dev. Psychol. 47:61499–503 [Google Scholar]
  24. DeLoache JS. 1989. Young children's understanding of the correspondence between a scale model and a larger space. Cogn. Dev. 4:2121–39 [Google Scholar]
  25. DeLoache JS. 2002. Early development of the understanding and use of symbolic artifacts. Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development U Goswami 206–26 Oxford, UK: Wiley- Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  26. DeLoache JS. 2004. Becoming symbol-minded. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8:266–70 [Google Scholar]
  27. DeLoache JS, Miller KF, Rosengren KS. 1997. The credible shrinking room: very young children's performance with symbolic and nonsymbolic relations. Psychol. Sci. 8:4308–13 [Google Scholar]
  28. DeLoache JS, Pierroutsakos SL, Uttal DH, Rosengren KS, Gottlieb A. 1998. Grasping the nature of pictures. Psychol. Sci. 9:3205–10 [Google Scholar]
  29. Dewar K, Xu F. 2007. Do 9-month-old infants expect distinct words to refer to kinds?. Dev. Psychol. 43:51227–38 [Google Scholar]
  30. Dewar K, Xu F. 2009. Do early nouns refer to kinds or distinct shapes? Evidence from 10-month-old infants. Psychol. Sci. 20:2252–57 [Google Scholar]
  31. Diesendruck G, Bloom P. 2003. How specific is the shape bias?. Child Dev. 74:1168–78 [Google Scholar]
  32. Donnelly KE, Gjersoe NL, Hood B. 2013. When pictures lie: children's misunderstanding of photographs. Cognition 129:151–62 [Google Scholar]
  33. Farroni T, Csibra G, Simion F, Johnson MH. 2002. Eye contact detection in humans from birth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:149602–5 [Google Scholar]
  34. Farroni T, Johnson MH, Brockbank M, Simion F. 2000. Infants' use of gaze direction to cue attention: the importance of perceived motion. Vis. Cogn. 7:6705–18 [Google Scholar]
  35. Farroni T, Mansfield EM, Lai C, Johnson MH. 2003. Infants perceiving and acting on the eyes: tests of an evolutionary hypothesis. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 85:3199–212 [Google Scholar]
  36. Farroni T, Massaccesi S, Pividori D, Johnson MH. 2004. Gaze following in newborns. Infancy 5:139–60 [Google Scholar]
  37. Feigenson L, Dehaene S, Spelke E. 2004. Core systems of number. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8:7307–14 [Google Scholar]
  38. Ferguson B, Waxman SR. 2014. Communication and categorization: new insights into the relation between speech, labels, and concepts for infants. Proc. 35th Annu. Conf. Cogn. Sci. Soc. M Knauff, M Pauen, N Sebanz, I Wachsmuth. Austin, TX: Cogn. Sci. Soc. [Google Scholar]
  39. Ferry AL, Hespos SJ, Waxman SR. 2010. Categorization in 3- and 4-month-old infants: an advantage of words over tones. Child Dev. 81:2472–79 [Google Scholar]
  40. Ferry AL, Hespos SJ, Waxman SR. 2013. Nonhuman primate vocalizations support categorization in very young human infants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110:3815231–35 [Google Scholar]
  41. Friedrich M, Friederici AD. 2005. Phonotactic knowledge and lexical-semantic processing in one-year-olds: brain responses to words and nonsense words in picture contexts. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17:111785–802 [Google Scholar]
  42. Futó J, Téglás E, Csibra G, Gergely G. 2010. Communicative function demonstration induces kind-based artifact representation in preverbal infants. Cognition 117:11–8 [Google Scholar]
  43. Galantucci B. 2005. An experimental study of the emergence of human communication systems. Cogn. Sci. 29:5737–67 [Google Scholar]
  44. Ganea PA. 2005. Contextual factors affect absent reference comprehension in 14-month-olds. Child Dev. 76:5989–98 [Google Scholar]
  45. Ganea PA, Allen ML, Butler LP, Carey S, DeLoache JS. 2009. Toddlers' referential understanding of pictures. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 104:3283–95 [Google Scholar]
  46. Gelman SA. 2004. Learning words for kinds: generic noun phrases in acquisition. Weaving a Lexicon DG Hall, SR Waxman 445–84 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  47. Gelman SA, Chesnick RJ, Waxman SR. 2005. Mother-child conversations about pictures and objects: referring to categories and individuals. Child Dev. 76:61129–43 [Google Scholar]
  48. Gelman SA, Coley JD, Rosengren KS, Hartman E, Pappas A. 1998. Beyond labeling: the role of maternal input in the acquisition of richly structured categories. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev. 63:1–148 [Google Scholar]
  49. Gelman SA, Raman L. 2003. Preschool children use linguistic form class and pragmatic cues to interpret generics. Child Dev. 74:1308–25 [Google Scholar]
  50. Gelman SA, Ware EA, Kleinberg F, Manczak EM, Stilwell SM. 2014. Individual differences in children's and parents' generic language. Child Dev. 85:924–40 [Google Scholar]
  51. Geraghty K, Waxman S, Gelman S. 2014. Learning words from pictures: 15- and 17-month-old infants appreciate the referential links among words, pictures, and objects. Cogn. Dev. 321–11 [Google Scholar]
  52. Gliga T, Csibra G. 2009. One-year-old infants appreciate the referential nature of deictic gestures and words. Psychol. Sci. 20:3347–53 [Google Scholar]
  53. Golinkoff RM, Mervis CB, Hirsh-Pasek K. 1994. Early object labels: the case for a developmental lexical principles framework. J. Child Lang. 21:125–55 [Google Scholar]
  54. Golinkoff RM, Shuff-Bailey M, Olguin R, Ruan W. 1995. Young children extend novel words at the basic level: evidence for the principle of categorical scope. Dev. Psychol. 31:3494–507 [Google Scholar]
  55. Goodman N. 1976. Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols Indianapolis, IN: Hackett [Google Scholar]
  56. Gredebäck G, Theuring C, Hauf P, Kenward B. 2008. The microstructure of infants' gaze as they view adult shifts in overt attention. Infancy 13:5533–43 [Google Scholar]
  57. Hall DG. 2009. Proper names in early word learning: rethinking a theoretical account of lexical development. Mind Lang. 24:4404–32 [Google Scholar]
  58. Hamlin JK, Wynn K. 2011. Young infants prefer prosocial to antisocial others. Cogn. Dev. 26:30–39 [Google Scholar]
  59. Jaswal VK, Markman EM. 2003. The relative strengths of indirect and direct word learning. Dev. Psychol. 39:4745–60 [Google Scholar]
  60. Johnson KE, Younger BA, Furrer SD. 2005. Infants' symbolic comprehension of actions modeled with toy replicas. Dev. Sci. 8:4299–314 [Google Scholar]
  61. Kita S. 2003. Pointing: Where Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum [Google Scholar]
  62. Kuhlmeier V, Wynn K, Bloom P. 2003. Attribution of dispositional states by 12-month-olds. Psychol. Sci. 14:5402–8 [Google Scholar]
  63. Kutas M, Federmeier KD. 2011. Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annu. Rev. Psychol. 62:621–47 [Google Scholar]
  64. Landau B, Smith LB, Jones SS. 1988. The importance of shape in early lexical learning. Cogn. Dev. 3:3299–321 [Google Scholar]
  65. Leslie AM. 1984. Infant perception of a manual pick-up event. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 2:19–32 [Google Scholar]
  66. Leslie SJ. 2007. Generics and the structure of the mind. Philos. Perspect. 21:1375–403 [Google Scholar]
  67. Leslie SJ, Khemlani S, Glucksberg S. 2011. Do all ducks lay eggs? The generic overgeneralization effect. J. Mem. Lang. 65:115–31 [Google Scholar]
  68. Macnamara J. 1982. Names for Things: A Study of Human Learning Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  69. Mareschal D, Johnson MH. 2003. The “what” and “where” of object representations in infancy. Cognition 88:3259–76 [Google Scholar]
  70. Markman EM. 1989. Categorization and Naming in Children: Problems of Induction Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  71. Markman EM, Jaswal VK. 2004. Acquiring and using a grammatical form class: lessons from the proper-count distinction. Weaving a Lexicon DG Hall, SR Waxman 371–409 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  72. Marno H, Davelaar EJ, Csibra G. 2014. Non-verbal communicative signals modulate attention to object properties. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 40:2752–62 [Google Scholar]
  73. Mascaro O, Csibra G. 2012. Representation of stable social dominance relations by human infants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109:186862–67 [Google Scholar]
  74. Mascaro O, Csibra G. 2014. Human infants' learning of social structures: the case of dominance hierarchy. Psychol. Sci. 25:1250–55 [Google Scholar]
  75. Meyer M, Baldwin DA. 2013. Pointing as a socio-pragmatic cue to particular versus generic reference. Lang. Learn. Dev. 9:3245–65 [Google Scholar]
  76. Moll H, Tomasello M. 2004. 12-and 18-month-old infants follow gaze to spaces behind barriers. Dev. Sci. 7:1F1–9 [Google Scholar]
  77. Moore C, Angelopoulos M, Bennett P. 1997. The role of movement in the development of joint visual attention. Infant Behav. Dev. 20:183–92 [Google Scholar]
  78. Namy LL, Waxman SR. 2005. Symbols redefined. Symbol Use and Symbolic Representation LL Namy 269–77 Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum [Google Scholar]
  79. Nazzi T, Bertoncini J. 2003. Before and after the vocabulary spurt: two modes of word acquisition?. Dev. Sci. 6:2136–42 [Google Scholar]
  80. Parise E, Csibra G. 2012. Electrophysiological evidence for the understanding of maternal speech by 9-month-old infants. Psychol. Sci. 23:7728–33 [Google Scholar]
  81. Parise E, Csibra G. 2014. Labels and pictures co-refer to object categories in adults and 9-month-old infant. Presented at Budapest CEU Conf. Cogn. Dev., Budapest, Hungary [Google Scholar]
  82. Peirce CS. 1955. Philosophical Writings of Peirce J Buchler New York: Dover [Google Scholar]
  83. Prasada S. 2000. Acquiring generic knowledge. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4:266–72 [Google Scholar]
  84. Preissler AM, Carey S. 2004. Do both pictures and words function as symbols for 18- and 24-month-old children?. J. Cogn. Dev. 5:2185–212 [Google Scholar]
  85. Rakoczy H, Tomasello M, Striano T. 2005. How children turn objects into symbols: a cultural learning account. Symbol Use and Symbolic Representation LL Namy 67–97 Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum [Google Scholar]
  86. Rhodes M. 2012. Irrational inferences? When children ignore evidence in category-based induction. Advances in Child Development. Rational Constructivism in Cognitive Development F Xu, T Kushnir, JB Benson 43219–36 Waltham, MA: Academic [Google Scholar]
  87. Rhodes M, Leslie SJ, Tworek CM. 2012. Cultural transmission of social essentialism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109:3413526–31 [Google Scholar]
  88. Rivera SM, Zawaydeh AN. 2007. Word comprehension facilitates object individuation in 10- and 11-month-old infants. Brain Res. 1146:146–57 [Google Scholar]
  89. Rochat P, Morgan R, Carpenter M. 1997. Young infants' sensitivity to movement information specifying social causality. Cogn. Dev. 12:4537–61 [Google Scholar]
  90. Rohlfing KJ, Longo MR, Bertenthal BI. 2012. Dynamic pointing triggers shifts of visual attention in young infants. Dev. Sci. 15:3426–35 [Google Scholar]
  91. Scott-Phillips TC, Kirby S, Ritchie GR. 2009. Signalling signalhood and the emergence of communication. Cognition 113:2226–33 [Google Scholar]
  92. Senju A, Csibra G. 2008. Gaze following in human infants depends on communicative signals. Curr. Biol. 18:9668–71 [Google Scholar]
  93. Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL, Marler P. 1980. Vervet monkey alarm calls: semantic communication in a free-ranging primate. Anim. Behav. 28:41070–94 [Google Scholar]
  94. Simon TJ, Hespos SJ, Rochat P. 1995. Do infants understand simple arithmetic? A replication of Wynn 1992. Cogn. Dev. 10:2253–69 [Google Scholar]
  95. Smith LB, Jones SS, Landau B, Gershkoff-Stowe L, Samuelson L. 2002. Object name learning provides on-the-job training for attention. Psychol. Sci. 13:113–19 [Google Scholar]
  96. Southgate V, Csibra G. 2009. Inferring the outcome of an ongoing novel action at 13 months. Dev. Psychol. 45:61794–98 [Google Scholar]
  97. Sperber D, Wilson D. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition Cambridge, UK: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  98. Thomsen L, Frankenhuis WE, Ingold-Smith M, Carey S. 2011. Big and mighty: Preverbal infants mentally represent social dominance. Science 331:6016477–80 [Google Scholar]
  99. Tomasello M. 2008. Origins of Human Communication Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  100. Tomasello M, Call J, Gluckman A. 1997. Comprehension of novel communicative signs by apes and human children. Child Dev. 68:61067–80 [Google Scholar]
  101. Tomasello M, Striano T, Rochat P. 1999. Do young children use objects as symbols?. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 17:4563–84 [Google Scholar]
  102. Topál J, Gergely G, Miklósi Á, Erdohegyi Á, Csibra G. 2008. Infants' perseverative search errors are induced by pragmatic misinterpretation. Science 321:58971831–34 [Google Scholar]
  103. Träuble B, Pauen S. 2007. The role of functional information for infant categorization. Cognition 105:2362–79 [Google Scholar]
  104. Triesch J, Teuscher C, Deák GO, Carlson E. 2006. Gaze following: why (not) learn it?. Dev. Sci. 9:2125–47 [Google Scholar]
  105. Vouloumanos A, Werker JF. 2007. Listening to language at birth: evidence for a bias for speech in neonates. Dev. Sci. 10:2159–64 [Google Scholar]
  106. Waxman SR, Booth AE. 2000. Principles that are invoked in the acquisition of words, but not facts. Cognition 77:2B33–43 [Google Scholar]
  107. Waxman SR, Braun I. 2005. Consistent (but not variable) names as invitations to form object categories: new evidence from 12-month-old infants. Cognition 95:3B59–68 [Google Scholar]
  108. Waxman SR, Gelman SA. 2009. Early word-learning entails reference, not merely associations. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13:6258–63 [Google Scholar]
  109. Waxman SR, Gelman S. 2010. Different kinds of concepts and different kinds of words: what words do for human cognition. The Making of Human Concepts D Mareschal, PC Quinn, SEG Lea 101–30 London: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  110. Waxman SR, Markow DB. 1995. Words as invitations to form categories: evidence from 12- to 13-month-old infants. Cogn. Psychol. 29:3257–302 [Google Scholar]
  111. Woodward AL, Markman EM, Fitzsimmons CM. 1994. Rapid word learning in 13- and 18-month-olds. Dev. Psychol. 30:4553–66 [Google Scholar]
  112. Wynn K, Chiang WC. 1998. Limits to infants' knowledge of objects: the case of magical appearance. Psychol. Sci. 9:6448–55 [Google Scholar]
  113. Xu F. 2005. Categories, kinds, and object individuation in infancy. Building Object Categories in Developmental Time L Gershkoff-Stowe, D Rakison 63–89 Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum [Google Scholar]
  114. Xu F, Carey S. 1996. Infants' metaphysics: the case of numerical identity. Cogn. Psychol. 30:2111–53 [Google Scholar]
  115. Xu F, Dewar K, Perfors A. 2009. Induction, overhypotheses, and the shape bias: some arguments and evidence for rational constructivism. The Origins of Object Knowledge BM Hood, LR Santos 263–84 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  116. Yoon JM, Johnson MH, Csibra G. 2008. Communication-induced memory biases in preverbal infants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:3613690–95 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015232
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error