1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Psychology
  4. Volume 76, 2025
  5. Article

Annual Review of Psychology

Volume 76, 2025

Morality in Our Mind and Across Cultures and Politics

Abstract

Moral judgments differ across cultures and politics, but they share a common theme in our minds: perceptions of harm. Both cultural ethnographies on moral values and psychological research on moral cognition highlight this shared focus on harm. Perceptions of harm are constructed from universal cognitive elements—including intention, causation, and suffering—but depend on the cultural context, allowing many values to arise from a common moral mind. This review traces the concept of harm across philosophy, cultural anthropology, and psychology, then discusses how different values (e.g., purity) across various taxonomies are grounded in perceived harm. We then explore two theories connecting culture to cognition—modularity and constructionism—before outlining how pluralism across human moral judgment is explained by the constructed nature of perceived harm. We conclude by showing how different perceptions of harm help drive political disagreements and reveal how sharing stories of harm can help bridge moral divides.

Keyword(s): culture, moral cognition, moral judgment, politics, values
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-020924-124236
2025-01-17
2025-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/psych/76/1/annurev-psych-020924-124236.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-020924-124236&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abrams S, Gray K. 2025.. The moral domain: what is wrong, what is right, and how your mind knows the difference. . In Cambridge Handbook of Moral Psychology, ed. P Robbins, B Malle . Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press. In press
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Alfano M, Cheong M, Curry OS. 2024.. Moral universals: a machine-reading analysis of 256 societies. . Heliyon 10:(6):e25940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25940
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  3. Allport G. 1954.. The Nature of Prejudice. New York:: Basic Books
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Aquinas T. 1947 (1273).. Summa Theologica, transl. Fathers of the English Dominican Province . New York:: Benziger Bros. Inc.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Am. Psychiatr. Assoc. 2013.. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Arlington, VA:: Am. Psychiatr. Publ. , 5th ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Ashokkumar A, Swann WB. 2022.. Restoring honor by slapping or disowning the daughter. . Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 49:(6):823–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221079106
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  7. Atari M, Graham J, Dehghani M. 2020.. Foundations of morality in Iran. . Evol. Hum. Behav. 41:(5):367–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.07.014
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  8. Atari M, Haidt J. 2023.. Ownership is (likely to be) a moral foundation. . Behav. Brain Sci. 46::e326. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X2300119X
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  9. Barrett HC, Saxe RR. 2021.. Are some cultures more mind-minded in their moral judgements than others?. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 376:(1838):20200288. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0288
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  10. Barrett LF. 2017.. The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoception and categorization. . Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 12:(1):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw154
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  11. Barrett LF, Mesquita B, Gendron M. 2011.. Context in emotion perception. . Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 20:(5):286–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411422522
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  12. Barrett LF, Satpute AB. 2013.. Large-scale brain networks in affective and social neuroscience: towards an integrative functional architecture of the brain. . Curr. Opin. in Neurobiol. 23:(3):361–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2012.12.012
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bentham J. 1789.. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London:: Clarendon
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Berger PL, Luckmann T. 1966.. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NJ:: Doubleday
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Blair RJR. 1995.. A cognitive developmental approach to morality: investigating the psychopath. . Cognition 57:(1):1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00676-P
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bloom P. 2013.. Just Babies: The Origins of Good and Evil. New York:: Broadway Books
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Braley A, Lenz GS, Adjodah D, Rahnama H, Pentland A. 2023.. Why voters who value democracy participate in democratic backsliding. . Nat. Hum. Behav. 7:(8):1282–93. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01594-w
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  18. Brooks JA, Shablack H, Gendron M, Satpute AB, Parrish MH, Lindquist KA. 2016.. The role of language in the experience and perception of emotion: a neuroimaging meta-analysis. . Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 12:(2):169–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw121
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Bryant A. 1977.. The Anita Bryant Story: The Survival of Our Nation's Families and the Threat of Militant Homosexuality. Grand Rapids, MI: Revell:
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Cameron CD, Lindquist KA, Gray K. 2015.. A constructionist review of morality and emotions: no evidence for specific links between moral content and discrete emotions. . Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 19:(4):371–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314566683
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  21. Costa PT, McCrae RR. 1992.. The five-factor model of personality and its relevance to personality disorders. . J. Pers. Disord. 6:(4):343–59. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.1992.6.4.343
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  22. Curry OS. 2016.. Morality as cooperation: a problem-centered approach. . In The Evolution of Morality, ed. TK Shackelford, RD Hansen , pp. 27–51. Cham, Switz:.: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19671-8_2
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Curry OS, Mullins DA, Whitehouse H. 2019.. Is it good to cooperate? Testing the theory of morality-as-cooperation in 60 societies. . Curr. Anthropol. 60:(1):47–69. https://doi.org/10.1086/701478
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  24. Cushman F, Gray K, Gaffey A, Mendes WB. 2012a.. Simulating murder: the aversion to harmful action. . Emotion 12:(1):2–7. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025071
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  25. Cushman F, Murray D, Gordon-McKeon S, Wharton S, Greene JD. 2012b.. Judgment before principle: engagement of the frontoparietal control network in condemning harms of omission. . Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 7:(8):888–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsr072
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  26. Cushman F, Young L. 2011.. Patterns of moral judgment derive from nonmoral psychological representations. . Cogn. Sci. 35:(6):1052–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01167.x
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  27. Cushman F, Young L, Hauser M. 2006.. The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: testing three principles of harm. . Psychol. Sci. 17:(12):1082–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01834.x
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  28. Decety J, Cacioppo S. 2012.. The speed of morality: a high-density electrical neuroimaging study. . J. Neurophysiol. 108:(11):3068–72. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00473.2012
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  29. DeScioli P, Gilbert S, Kurzban R. 2012.. Indelible victims and persistent punishers in moral cognition. . Psychol. Inq. 23:(2):143–49
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  30. Douglas PM. 1966.. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. Abingdon, UK:: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Dretske FI. 1973.. Perception and other minds. . Noûs 7:(1):34–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/2216182
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  32. Dunn A. 2020.. Few Trump or Biden supporters have close friends who back the opposing candidate. . Pew Research Center, Sept. 18. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/09/18/few-trump-or-biden-supporters-have-close-friends-who-back-the-opposing-candidate/
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Ekman P. 1992.. An argument for basic emotions. . Cogn. Emot. 6:(3–4):169–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208411068
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  34. Fine TS. 1992.. Individualism & liberalism/conservatism: broadening dimensions of policy support. . Polity 25:(2):315–27. https://doi.org/10.2307/3235115
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  35. Fiske A. 2004.. Relational Models Theory 2.0. Mahwah, NJ:: Lawrence Erlbaum
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Fiske AP, Rai TS. 2014.. Virtuous Violence: Hurting and Killing to Create, Sustain, End, and Honor Social Relationships. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316104668
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Fitouchi L, André J-B, Baumard N. 2022.. Moral disciplining: the cognitive and evolutionary foundations of puritanical morality. . Behav. Brain Sci. 46::e293. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x22002047
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  38. Fodor J. 1983.. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Freire P. 2005.. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London:: Continuum. 30th anniv. ed .
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Freud S. 2010 (1923).. The Ego and the Id. St Paul, MN:: Wilder Publ.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Frimer JA, Gaucher D, Schaefer NK. 2014.. Political conservatives’ affinity for obedience to authority is loyal, not blind. . Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 40:(9):1205–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214538672
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  42. Frimer JA, Tell CE, Motyl M. 2017.. Sacralizing liberals and fair-minded conservatives: ideological symmetry in the moral motives in the culture war. . Analyses Soc. Issues Public Policy 17:(1):33–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12127
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  43. Geertz C. 1973.. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York:: Basic Books
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Gelman SA, Legare CH. 2011.. Concepts and folk theories. . Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 40::379–98. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145822
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  45. Gigerenzer G. 2008.. Moral intuition = fast and frugal heuristics?. In Moral Psychology, Vol. 2: The Cognitive Science of Morality: Intuition Diversity, ed. W Sinnott-Armstrong , pp. 1–26. Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Gilligan C. 1977.. In a different voice: women's conceptions of self and of morality. . Harv. Educ. Rev. 47:(4):481–517. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.47.4.g6167429416hg5l0
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  47. Gottschall J. 2013.. The Storytelling Animal: How Stories Make Us Human. Boston:: Mariner Books. , 1st ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Graham J, Haidt J, Koleva S, Motyl M, Iyer R, et al. 2013.. Moral foundations theory: the pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. . In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 47, ed. P Devine, A Plant , pp. 55–130. San Diego, CA:: Academic. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Graham J, Haidt J, Motyl M, Meindl P, Iskiwitch C, Mooijman M. 2018.. Moral foundations theory: on the advantages of moral pluralism over moral monism. . In Atlas of Moral Psychology, ed. K Gray, J Graham , pp. 211–22. New York:: Guilford
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Graham J, Haidt J, Nosek BA. 2009.. Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. . J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 96:(5):1029–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  51. Graham J, Nosek BA, Haidt J, Iyer R, Koleva S, Ditto PH. 2011.. Mapping the moral domain. . J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 101:(2):366–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  52. Gray K. 2025.. Outraged: Why We Fight About Morality and Politics. New York:: Pantheon
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Gray K, DiMaggio N, Schein C, Kachanoff F. 2022a.. The problem of purity in moral psychology. . Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 27:(3):272–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683221124741
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  54. Gray K, Keeney JE. 2015.. Impure or just weird? Scenario sampling bias raises questions about the foundation of morality. . Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 6:(8):859–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615592241
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  55. Gray K, MacCormack JK, Henry T, Banks E, Schein C, et al. 2022b.. The affective harm account (AHA) of moral judgment: reconciling cognition and affect, dyadic morality and disgust, harm and purity. . J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 123:(6):1199–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000310
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  56. Gray K, Schein C, Ward AF. 2014.. The myth of harmless wrongs in moral cognition: automatic dyadic completion from sin to suffering. . J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 143:(4):1600–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036149
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  57. Gray K, Wegner DM. 2009.. Moral typecasting: divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients. . J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 96:(3):505–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013748
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  58. Gray K, Wegner DM. 2010.. Blaming God for our pain: human suffering and the divine mind. . Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 14:(1):7–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309350299
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  59. Gray K, Young L, Waytz A. 2012.. Mind perception is the essence of morality. . Psychol. Inq. 23:(2):101–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840x.2012.651387
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  60. Haidt J. 2001.. The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. . Psychol. Rev. 108:(4):814–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  61. Haidt J. 2012.. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York:: Pantheon
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Haidt J, Bjorklund F, Murphy S. 2000.. Moral dumbfounding: when intuition finds no reason. Work Pap., Univ. Va., Charlottesville
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Haidt J, Joseph C. 2004.. Intuitive ethics: how innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. . Daedalus 133:(4):55–66
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  64. Haidt J, Joseph C. 2007.. The moral mind: how five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. . Innate Mind 3::367–92
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Haidt J, Koller SH, Dias MG. 1993.. Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 65:(4):613–28
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  66. Hamlin JK, Wynn K, Bloom P. 2008.. Social evaluation by preverbal infants. . Pediatric Res. 63:(3):219–19. https://doi.org/10.1203/pdr.0b013e318168c6e5
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  67. Hardy SA, Willoughby BJ. 2017.. Religiosity and chastity among single young adults and married adults. . Psychol. Relig. Spiritual. 9:(3):285–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000112
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  68. Harnad S. 2005.. To cognize is to categorize: Cognition is categorization. . In Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science, ed. H Cohen, C Lefebvre , pp. 19–43. Amsterdam:: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044612-7/50056-1
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Hartman R, Blakey W, Womick J, Bail C, Finkel E, et al. 2022a.. Interventions to reduce partisan animosity. . Nat. Hum. Behav. 6::1194–205. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01442-3
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  70. Hartman R, Hester N, Gray K. 2022b.. People see political opponents as more stupid than evil. . Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 49:(7):1014–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221089451
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  71. Hegel GWF. 1967 (1821).. Hegel's Philosophy of Right, transl. T. M. Knox . Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Henrich J, Heine S, Norenzayan A. 2010.. The weirdest people in the world?. Behav. Brain Sci. 33:(2–3):61–83
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  73. Hester N, Gray K. 2020.. The moral psychology of raceless genderless strangers. . Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 15:(2):216–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619885840
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  74. Hobolt SB, Leeper TJ, Tilley J. 2021.. Divided by the vote: affective polarization in the wake of the Brexit referendum. . Br. J. Polit. Sci. 51:(4):1476–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000125
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  75. Hoover J, Portillo-Wightman G, Yeh L, Havaldar S, Davani AM, et al. 2020.. Moral foundations Twitter corpus: a collection of 35k tweets annotated for moral sentiment. . Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 11:(8):1057–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619876629
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  76. Horowitz JM, Parker K, Stepler R. 2017.. Wide partisan gaps in U.S. over how far the country has come on gender equality. . Pew Research Center, Oct. 18. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2017/10/18/wide-partisan-gaps-in-u-s-over-how-far-the-country-has-come-on-gender-equality/
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Hutcherson CA, Gross JJ. 2011.. The moral emotions: a social-functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt. . J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 100:(4):719–37. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022408
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  78. Iyengar S, Sood G, Lelkes Y. 2012.. Affect, not ideology: a social identity perspective on polarization. . Public Opin. Q. 76:(3):405–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  79. Iyer R, Koleva S, Graham J, Ditto P, Haidt J. 2012.. Understanding libertarian morality: the psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians. . PLOS ONE 7:(8):e42366. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042366
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  80. Janoff-Bulman R, Carnes NC. 2013.. Surveying the moral landscape: moral motives and group-based moralities. . Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 17:(3):219–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313480274
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  81. Janoff-Bulman R, Sheikh S, Baldacci KG. 2008.. Mapping moral motives: approach, avoidance, and political orientation. . J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 44:(4):1091–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.11.003
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  82. Jones JM. 2005.. Race, ideology, and support for affirmative action. . Gallup, Aug. 23. https://news.gallup.com/poll/18091/race-ideology-support-affirmative-action.aspx
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Kant I. 1997 (1781).. Lectures on Ethics. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Kant I. 1956 (1788).. Critique of Practical Reason. Indianapolis, IN:: Bobbs-Merrill
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Kellogg JH. 1890.. Plain Facts for Old and Young: Embracing the Natural History and Hygiene of Organic Life. Burlington, IA:: I. F. Segner. http://archive.org/details/plainfactsforol00kell
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Kennedy B, Atari M, Mostafazadeh Davani A, Hoover J, Omrani A, et al. 2021.. Moral concerns are differentially observable in language. . Cognition 212::104696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104696
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  87. Kohlberg L. 1964.. Development of moral character and moral ideology. . In Review of Child Development Research, Vol. 1, ed. ML Hofmann, LW Hofmann , pp. 381–431. New York:: Russell Sage Found.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Kubin E, Gray KJ, von Sikorski C. 2023.. Reducing political dehumanization by pairing facts with personal experiences. . Polit. Psychol. 44:(5):1119–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12875
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  89. Kubin E, Puryear C, Schein C, Gray K. 2021.. Personal experiences bridge moral and political divides better than facts. . PNAS 118:(6):e2008389118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008389118
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  90. Kubin E, von Sikorski C, Gray K. 2024.. Political censorship feels acceptable when ideas seem harmful and false. . Polit. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.13011
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Landy JF, Goodwin GP. 2015.. Does incidental disgust amplify moral judgment? A meta-analytic review of experimental evidence. . Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 10:(4):518–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615583128
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  92. Leudar I, Costall A. 2004.. On the persistence of the ‘problem of other minds’ in psychology: Chomsky, Grice and Theory of Mind. . Theory Psychol. 14:(5):601–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354304046175
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  93. Lindquist KA, Barrett LF. 2012.. A functional architecture of the human brain: emerging insights from the science of emotion. . Trends Cogn. Sci. 16:(11):533–40
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  94. Lindquist KA, Wager TD, Kober H, Bliss-Moreau E, Barrett LF. 2012.. The brain basis of emotion: a meta-analytic review. . Behav. Brain Sci. 35:(3):121–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11000446
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  95. Maslow AH. 1943.. A theory of human motivation. . Psychol. Rev. 50:(4):370–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  96. McCloskey M. 1983.. Intuitive physics. . Sci. Am. 248:(4):122–30
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  97. McHugh C, McGann M, Igou ER, Kinsella EL. 2022.. Moral judgment as categorization (MJAC). . Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 17:(1):131–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691621990636
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  98. McNally RJ, Robinaugh DJ, Wu GWY, Wang L, Deserno MK, Borsboom D. 2015.. Mental disorders as causal systems: a network approach to posttraumatic stress disorder. . Clin. Psychol. Sci. 3:(6):836–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702614553230
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  99. Mikhail J. 2007.. Universal moral grammar: theory, evidence and the future. . Trends Cogn. Sci. 11:(4):143–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.007
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  100. Mill JS. 1861.. Utilitarianism. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Mill JS. 2002 (1859).. On Liberty. Clark, NJ:: Lawbook Exchange
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Mill JS. 2004 (1848).. Principles of Political Economy. Amherst, NY:: Prometheus Books
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Miller GA. 1956.. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. . Psychol. Rev. 63:(2):81–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  104. Mukherjee D, Rahman MA. 2016.. To drill or not to drill? An econometric analysis of US public opinion. . Energy Policy 91::341–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.11.023
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  105. Mumford SR. 1989.. Himalayan Dialogue: Tibetan Lamas and Gurung Shamans in Nepal. Madison: Univ. Wis. Press:
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Murphy GL. 2004.. The Big Book of Concepts. Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Nichols S. 2002.. Norms with feeling: towards a psychological account of moral judgment. . Cognition 84:(2):221–36
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  108. Nietzsche FW. 2018 (1886).. Beyond Good and Evil, transl. H. Zimmern . Suwanee, GA:: 12th Media Services
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Nisbett RE, Wilson TD. 1977.. Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. . Psychol. Rev. 84:(3):231–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  110. Nucci LP, Turiel E. 1978.. Social interactions and the development of social concepts in preschool children. . Child Dev. 49:(2):400–7. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128704
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  111. Nyhan B, Reifler J. 2010.. When corrections fail: the persistence of political misperceptions. . Polit. Behav. 32:(2):303–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  112. Ochoa NR. 2022.. Template matching and moral judgment: a new method and empirical test. . Poetics 92::101643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2021.101643
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  113. Pasek MH, Ankori-Karlinsky L-O, Levy-Vene A, Moore-Berg SL. 2022.. Misperceptions about out-partisans’ democratic values may erode democracy. . Sci. Rep. 12:(1):16284. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19616-4
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  114. Piaget J. 1932.. The Moral Judgment of the Child. San Diego, CA:: Harcourt Brace
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Puryear C, Gray K. 2024.. Using “balanced pragmatism” in political discussions increases cross-partisan respect. . J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 153:(5):1189–212. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001554
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  116. Puryear C, Kubin E, Schein C, Bigman Y, Gray K. 2022.. Bridging political divides by correcting the basic morality bias. . PsyArXiv. https://psyarxiv.com/fk8g6
  117. Rai TS. 2018.. Relationship regulation theory. . In Atlas of Moral Psychology, ed. K Gray, J Graham , pp. 231–40. New York:: Guilford
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Rai TS, Fiske AP. 2011.. Moral psychology is relationship regulation: moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. . Psychol. Rev. 118:(1):57–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021867
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  119. Rosch E. 1978.. Principles of categorization. . In Cognition and Categorization, ed. E Rosch, BB Lloyd , pp. 189–206. Mahwah, NJ:: Lawrence Erlbaum
     [Google Scholar]
  120. Rosch E, Lloyd BB, eds. 1978.. Cognition and Categorization. Mahwah, NJ:: Lawrence Erlbaum
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Rousseau J-J. 1998 (1762).. The Social Contract. Hertfordshire, UK:: Wordsworth Ed. Ltd.
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Royzman EB, Kim K, Leeman RF. 2015.. The curious tale of Julie and Mark: unraveling the moral dumbfounding effect. . Judgm. Decis. Mak. 10:(4):296–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/s193029750000512x
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  123. Rozin P, Lowery L, Imada S, Haidt J. 1999.. The CAD triad hypothesis: a mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). . J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 76::574–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.574
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  124. Sagi E, Dehghani M. 2014.. Measuring moral rhetoric in text. . Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 32:(2):132–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439313506837
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  125. Sasaki M. 2019.. Trust in Contemporary Society. Leiden, Neth:.: Koninklijke Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004390430
    [Google Scholar]
  126. Schein C, Gray K. 2015.. The unifying moral dyad: liberals and conservatives share the same harm-based moral template. . Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 41:(8):1147–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215591501
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  127. Schein C, Gray K. 2018.. The theory of dyadic morality: reinventing moral judgment by redefining harm. . Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 22:(1):32–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868317698288
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  128. Schein C, Ritter R, Gray K. 2016.. Harm mediates the disgust-immorality link. . Emotion 16::862–76
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  129. Schwarz N, Clore GL. 2003.. Mood as information: 20 years later. . Psychol. Inq. 14:(3–4):296–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2003.9682896
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  130. Schwitzgebel E, Cushman F. 2012.. Expertise in moral reasoning? Order effects on moral judgment in professional philosophers and non-philosophers. . Mind Lang. 27:(2):135–53
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  131. Sevelsted A, Toubøl J. 2023.. Introduction: movements and morality. . In The Power of Morality in Movements, ed. A Sevelsted, J Toubøl , pp. 3–13. Cham, Switz:.: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98798-5_1
    [Google Scholar]
  132. Shultz TR, Wright K, Schleifer M. 1986.. Assignment of moral responsibility and punishment. . Child Dev. 57:(1):177–84. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130649
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  133. Shweder RA. 2012.. Relativism and universalism. . In A Companion to Moral Anthropology, ed. D Fassin , pp. 85–102. Chichester, UK:: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118290620.ch5
    [Google Scholar]
  134. Shweder RA, Haidt J. 1993.. The future of moral psychology: truth, intuition, and the pluralist way. . Psychol. Sci. 4:(6):360–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00582.x
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  135. Shweder RA, Mahapatra M, Miller JG. 1987.. Culture and moral development. . In The Emergence of Morality in Young Children, ed. J Kagan, S Lamb , pp. 1–82. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  136. Shweder RA, Miller JG. 1985.. The Social Construction of the Person. New York:: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
  137. Shweder RA, Much NC, Mahapatra M, Park L. 1997.. The “big three” of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity), and the “big three” explanations of suffering. . In Morality and Health, ed. AM Brandt, P Rozin , pp. 119–69. New York:: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  138. Stanley ML, Yin S, Sinnott-Armstrong W. 2019.. A reason-based explanation for moral dumbfounding. . Judgm. Decis. Mak. 14:(2):120–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500003351
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  139. Suhler CL, Churchland P. 2011.. Can innate, modular “foundations” explain morality? Challenges for Haidt's moral foundations theory. . J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23:(9):2103–16. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2011.21637
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  140. Tisak MS, Turiel E. 1984.. Children's conceptions of moral and prudential rules. . Child Dev. 55:(3):1030–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130154
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  141. Tisak MS, Turiel E. 1988.. Variation in seriousness of transgressions and children's moral and conventional concepts. . Dev. Psychol. 24:(3):352–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.24.3.352
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  142. Tomasello M, Vaish A. 2013.. Origins of human cooperation and morality. . Annu. Rev. Psychol. 64::231–55. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143812
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  143. Turiel E. 1983.. The Development of Social Knowledge: Morality and Convention. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  144. Turiel E, Killen M, Helwig CC. 1987.. Morality: its structure, functions, and vagaries. . In The Emergence of Morality in Young Children, ed. J Kagan, S Lamb , pp. 155–243. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  145. Van Bavel JJ, FeldmanHall O, Mende-Siedlecki P. 2015.. The neuroscience of moral cognition: from dual processes to dynamic systems. . Curr. Opin. Psychol. 6::167–72
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  146. Vytal K, Hamann S. 2010.. Neuroimaging support for discrete neural correlates of basic emotions: a voxel-based meta-analysis. . J. Cogn. Neurosci. 22:(12):2864–85
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  147. Weber M. 1978.. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press:
     [Google Scholar]
  148. Wegner DM, Gilbert DT. 2000.. Social psychology—the science of human experience. . In The Message Within: The Role of Subjective Experience in Social Cognition and Behavior, ed. H Bless, JP Forgas , pp. 1–9. New York:: Psychology Press
     [Google Scholar]
  149. Wellman HM. 1992.. The Child's Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press
     [Google Scholar]
  150. Williams KD. 2007.. Ostracism: the kiss of social death. . Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass 1:(1):236–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00004.x
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  151. Womick J, Goya-Tocchetto D, Ochoa NR, Rebollar C, Kapsaskis K, et al. 2024.. Moral disagreement across politics is explained by different assumptions about who is most vulnerable to harm. . PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/qsg7j
    [Google Scholar]
  152. Woo BM, Steckler CM, Le DT, Hamlin JK. 2017.. Social evaluation of intentional, truly accidental, and negligently accidental helpers and harmers by 10-month-old infants. . Cognition 168::154–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.029
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  153. Yudkin DA, Goodwin G, Reece AG, Gray K, Bhatia S. 2023.. A large-scale investigation reveals unexplored regions in the landscape of everyday moral experience. . PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/5pcew
  154. Zajonc RB. 1980.. Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. . Am. Psychol. 35:(2):151–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-020924-124236
Loading
Morality in Our Mind and Across Cultures and Politics
Annual Review of Psychology 76, 663 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020924-124236
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-020924-124236
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-020924-124236
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error