1932

Abstract

Much emotion research has focused on the end result of the emotion process, categorical emotions, as reported by the protagonist or diagnosed by the researcher, with the aim of differentiating these discrete states. In contrast, this review concentrates on the emotion process itself by examining how () elicitation, or the appraisal of events, leads to () differentiation, in particular, action tendencies accompanied by physiological responses and manifested in facial, vocal, and gestural expressions, before () conscious representation or experience of these changes (feeling) and () categorizing and labeling these changes according to the semantic profiles of emotion words. The review focuses on empirical, particularly experimental, studies from emotion research and neighboring domains that contribute to a better understanding of the unfolding emotion process and the underlying mechanisms, including the interactions among emotion components.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011854
2019-01-04
2024-10-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/psych/70/1/annurev-psych-122216-011854.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011854&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Aue T, Flykt A, Scherer KR 2007. First evidence for differential and sequential efferent effects of stimulus relevance and goal conduciveness appraisal. Biol. Psychol. 74:3347–57
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aue T, Scherer KR 2008. Appraisal-driven somatovisceral response patterning: effects of intrinsic pleasantness and goal conduciveness. Biol. Psychol. 79:2158–64
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Aue T, Scherer KR 2011. Effects of intrinsic pleasantness and goal conduciveness appraisals on somatovisceral responding: somewhat similar, but not identical. Biol. Psychol. 86:165–73
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bachorowski J-A, Owren MJ 1995. Vocal expression of emotion: acoustic properties of speech are associated with emotional intensity and context. Psychol. Sci. 6:4219–24
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bachorowski J-A, Smoski MJ, Owen MJ 2001. The acoustic features of human laughter. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110:3 Pt. 11581–97
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Banse R, Scherer KR 1996. Acoustic profiles in vocal emotion expression. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 70:3614–36
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bänziger T, Mortillaro M, Scherer KR 2012. Introducing the Geneva Multimodal expression corpus for experimental research on emotion perception. Emotion 12:51161–79
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bänziger T, Scherer KR 2010. Introducing the Geneva Multimodal Emotion Portrayal (GEMEP) corpus. Blueprint for Affective Computing: A Sourcebook KR Scherer, T Bänziger, EB Roesch 271–94 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Barlett C, Witkower Z, Mancini C, Saleem M 2016. Breaking the link between provocation and aggression: the role of mitigating information. Aggress. Behav. 42:6555–62
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Barlett CP 2013. Excuses, excuses: a meta-analytic review of how mitigating information can change aggression and an exploration of moderating variables. Aggress. Behav. 39:6472–81
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bediou B, Scherer KR 2014. Egocentric fairness perception: emotional reactions and individual differences in overt responses. PLOS ONE 9:2e88432
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Belyk M, Brown S 2014. The acoustic correlates of valence depend on emotion family. J. Voice 28:4523.e9–18
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Berkowitz L, Harmon-Jones E 2004. Toward an understanding of the determinants of anger. Emotion 4:2107–30
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bierbrauer F, Ockenfels A, Pollak A, Rückert D 2017. Robust mechanism design and social preferences. J. Public Econ. 149:59–80
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bossuyt E, Moors A, De Houwer J 2014. Exploring the relations between regret, self-agency, and the tendency to repair using experimental methods and structural equation modeling. Psychol. Rec. 64:4841–57
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Botvinick MM 2007. Conflict monitoring and decision making: reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 7:4356–66
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Briefer EF 2012. Vocal expression of emotions in mammals: mechanisms of production and evidence. J. Zool. 288:11–20
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Brosch T, Scherer KR, Grandjean DM, Sander D 2013. The impact of emotion on perception, attention, memory, and decision-making. Swiss Med. Wkly. 143:w13786
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Carlsmith JM, Gross AE 1969. Some effects of guilt on compliance. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 11:3232–39
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Chalabaev A, Major B, Cury F, Sarrazin P 2009. Physiological markers of challenge and threat mediate the effects of performance-based goals on performance. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 45:4991–94
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Chen S, Lee-Chai AY, Bargh JA 2001. Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 80:2173–87
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Cherek D, Spiga R, Steinberg J, Kelly T 1990. Human aggressive responses maintained by avoidance or escape from point loss. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 53:2293–303
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Civai C 2013. Rejecting unfairness: emotion-driven reaction or cognitive heuristic. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:126
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Dael N, Goudbeek M, Scherer KR 2013. Perceived gesture dynamics in nonverbal expression of emotion. Perception 42:6642–57
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Dael N, Mortillaro M, Scherer KR 2012.a The body action and posture coding system (BAP): development and reliability. J. Nonverbal Behav. 36:297–121
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Dael N, Mortillaro M, Scherer KR 2012.b Emotion expression in body action and posture. Emotion 12:51085–101
    [Google Scholar]
  27. de Gelder B 2006. Towards the neurobiology of emotional body language. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7:3242–49
    [Google Scholar]
  28. De Houwer J, Moors A 2010. Implicit measures: similarities and differences. Handbook of Implicit Social Cognition: Measurement, Theory, and Applications B Gawronski, K Payne 176–93 New York: Guilford Press
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Delplanque S, Grandjean D, Chrea C, Coppin G, Aymard L et al. 2009. Sequential unfolding of novelty and pleasantness appraisals of odors: evidence from facial electromyography and autonomic reactions. Emotion 9:3316–28
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Denson TF, Spanovic M, Miller N 2009. Cognitive appraisals and emotions predict cortisol and immune responses: a meta-analysis of acute laboratory social stressors and emotion inductions. Psychol. Bull. 135:6823–53
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Dignath D, Kiesel A, Eder AB 2015. Flexible conflict management: conflict avoidance and conflict adjustment in reactive cognitive control. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 41:4975–88
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Donnerstein E, Wilson DW 1976. Effects of noise and perceived control on ongoing and subsequent aggressive behavior. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 34:5774–81
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Eder AB, Rothermund K 2008. When do motor behaviors (mis)match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions. J. Exp. Psychol. 137:262–81
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Ekman P 1997. What we have learned by measuring facial behavior. What the Face Reveals P Ekman, EI Rosenberg 469–85 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Ekman P, Friesen WV 1978. Facial Action Coding System: A Technique for the Measurement of Facial Movement Palo Alto, CA: Consult. Psychol. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Ellsworth PC, Scherer KR 2003. Appraisal processes in emotion. Handbook of Affective Sciences RJ Davidson, KR Scherer, HH Goldsmith 572–95 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Fast NJ, Chen S 2009. When the boss feels inadequate: power, incompetence, and aggression. Psychol. Sci. 20:1406–13
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Fleischmann A, Lammers J, Conway P, Galinsky AD 2018. Paradoxical effects of power on moral thinking: why power both increases and decreases deontological and utilitarian moral decisions. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Frijda N, Scherer KR 2009. Emotion definitions (psychological perspectives). Oxford Companion to Emotion and the Affective Sciences D Sander, KR Scherer 142–44 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Frijda NH 1986. The Emotions Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Frijda NH, Kuipers P, ter Schure E 1989. Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 57:212–28
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Gaab J, Rohleder N, Nater UM, Ehlert U 2005. Psychological determinants of the cortisol stress response: the role of anticipatory cognitive appraisal. Psychoneuroendocrinology 30:6599–610
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Galinsky AD, Gruenfeld DH, Magee JC 2003. From power to action. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 85:453–66
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Galvin BM, Randel AE, Collins BJ, Johnson RE 2018. Changing the focus of locus (of control): a targeted review of the locus of control literature and agenda for future research. J. Organ. Behav. 38:820–33
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Gentsch K, Grandjean D, Scherer KR 2014. Coherence explored between emotion components: evidence from event-related potentials and facial electromyography. Biol. Psychol. 98:70–81
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Gentsch K, Grandjean D, Scherer KR 2015.a Appraisals generate specific configurations of facial muscle movements in a gambling task: evidence for the component process model of emotion. PLOS ONE 10:8e0135837
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Gentsch K, Grandjean D, Scherer KR 2015.b Temporal dynamics and potential neural sources of goal conduciveness, control, and power appraisal. Biol. Psychol. 112:77–93
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Goudbeek M, Scherer KR 2010. Beyond arousal: valence and potency/control in the vocal expression of emotion. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 128:31322–36
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Gramer M, Supp N 2014. Social support and prolonged cardiovascular reactivity: the moderating influence of relationship quality and type of support. Biol. Psychol. 101:1–8
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Gray JA, McNaughton N 1996. The neuropsychology of anxiety: reprise. Nebr. Symp. Motiv. 43:61–134
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Guinote A 2017. How power affects people: activating, wanting, and goal seeking. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 68:353–81
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Güth W, Kocher MG 2014. More than thirty years of ultimatum bargaining experiments: motives, variations, and a survey of the recent literature. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 108:396–409
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Hamm AO, Schupp HT, Weike AI 2003. Motivational organization of emotions: autonomic changes, cortical responses and reflex modulation. Handbook of Affective Sciences RJ Davidson, KR Scherer, HH Goldsmith 187–211 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Harvey A, Nathens AB, Bandiera G, LeBlanc VR 2010. Threat and challenge: cognitive appraisal and stress responses in simulated trauma resuscitations. Med. Educ. 44:6587–94
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Heller AS, Lapate RC, Mayer KE, Davidson RJ 2014. The face of negative affect: Trial-by-trial corrugator responses to negative pictures are positively associated with amygdala and negatively associated with ventromedial prefrontal cortex activity. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 26:92102–10
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Hiroto DS 1974. Locus of control and learned helplessness. J. Exp. Psychol. 102:2187–93
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Johnstone T, van Reekum CM, Hird K, Kirsner K, Scherer KR 2005. Affective speech elicited with a computer game. Emotion 5:4513–18
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Johnstone T, van Reekum CM, Scherer KR 2001. Vocal correlates of appraisal processes. Scherer et al. 2001 271–84
  59. Juslin PN, Laukka P 2003. Communication of emotions in vocal expression and music performance: different channels, same code. Psychol. Bull. 129:5770–814
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Juslin PN, Scherer KR 2005. Vocal expression of affect. The New Handbook of Methods in Nonverbal Behavior Research JA Harrigan, R Rosenthal, K Scherer 65–135 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Kemeny ME 2009. Psychobiological responses to social threat: evolution of a psychological model in psychoneuroimmunology. Brain Behav. Immun. 23:11–9
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Ko SJ, Sadler MS, Galinsky AD 2015. The sound of power: conveying and detecting hierarchical rank through voice. Psychol. Sci. 26:13–14
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Konecni VJ 1972. Some effects of guilt on compliance: a field replication. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 23:130–32
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Kozlik J, Neumann R, Lozo L 2015. Contrasting motivational orientation and evaluative coding accounts: on the need to differentiate the effectors of approach/avoidance responses. Front. Psychol. 6:563
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Kreibig SD 2010. Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: a review. Biol. Psychol. 84:3394–421
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Krieglmeyer R, De Houwer J, Deutsch R 2013. On the nature of automatically triggered approach-avoidance behavior. Emot. Rev. 5:3280–84
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Krieglmeyer R, Deutsch R 2013. Approach does not equal approach: Angry facial expressions evoke approach only when it serves aggression. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 4:5607–14
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Kulik JA, Brown R 1979. Frustration, attribution of blame, and aggression. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 15:2183–94
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Kuppens P, Van Mechelen I, Smits DJM, De Boeck P 2003. The appraisal basis of anger: specificity, necessity, and sufficiency of components. Emotion 3:3254–69
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Lammers J, Galinsky AD, Gordijn EH, Otten S 2008. Illegitimacy moderates the effects of power on approach. Psychol. Sci. 19:6558–64
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Lanctôt N, Hess U 2007. The timing of appraisals. Emotion 7:1207–12
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Lang PJ 2014. Emotion's response patterns: the brain and the autonomic nervous system. Emot. Rev. 6:293–99
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Larsen JT, Norris CJ, Cacioppo JT 2003. Effects of positive and negative affect on electromyographic activity over zygomaticus major and corrugator supercilii. Psychophysiology 40:5776–85
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Laukka P, Elfenbein HA 2012. Emotion appraisal dimensions can be inferred from vocal expressions. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 3:5529–36
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Laukka P, Juslin P, Bresin R 2005. A dimensional approach to vocal expression of emotion. Cogn. Emot. 19:5633–53
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Lazarus RS, Folkman S 1984. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping New York: Free Press
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Lee DH, Susskind JM, Anderson AK 2013. Social transmission of the sensory benefits of eye widening in fear expressions. Psychol. Sci. 24:6957–65
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Lhommet M, Marsella SC 2015. Expressing emotion through posture and gesture. The Oxford Handbook of Affective Computing RA Calvo, SK D'Mello, J Gratch, A Kappas 273–85 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Lole L, Gonsalvez CJ, Blaszczynski A, Clarke AR 2012. Electrodermal activity reliably captures physiological differences between wins and losses during gambling on electronic machines. Psychophysiology 49:2154–63
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Löw A, Lang PJ, Smith JC, Bradley MM 2008. Both predator and prey: emotional arousal in threat and reward. Psychol. Sci. 19:9865–73
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Martinez LM, Zeelenberg M, Rijsman JB 2011. Behavioural consequences of regret and disappointment in social bargaining games. Cogn. Emot. 25:2351–59
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Matarazzo O, Pizzini B, Greco C, Carpentieri M 2016. Effects of a chance task outcome on the offers in the ultimatum game: the mediation role of emotions. 7th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications, 16–18 Oct.295–300 New York: IEEE
    [Google Scholar]
  83. McCloskey MS, Berman ME, Coccaro EF 2005. Providing an escape option reduces retaliatory aggression. Aggress. Behav. 31:3228–37
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Mehu M, Scherer KR 2015. Emotion categories and dimensions in the facial communication of affect: an integrated approach. Emotion 15:6798–811
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Moors A 2009. Theories of emotion causation: a review. Cogn. Emot. 23:4625–62
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Moors A 2017. The integrated theory of emotional behavior follows a radically goal-directed approach. Psychol. Inq. 28:168–75
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Moors A, Boddez Y, De Houwer J 2017. The power of goal-directed processes in the causation of emotional and other actions. Emot. Rev. 9:4310–18
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Moors A, De Houwer J 2006. Automaticity: a theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychol. Bull. 132:297–326
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Moors A, Fischer M 2018. Demystifying the role of emotion in behavior: toward a goal-directed account. Cogn. Emot. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Moors A, Scherer KR 2013. The role of appraisal in emotion. Handbook of Cognition and Emotion MD Robinson, E Watkins, E Harmon-Jones 135–55 New York: Guilford Press
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Mortillaro M, Mehu M, Scherer KR 2011. Subtly different positive emotions can be distinguished by their facial expressions. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 2:3262–71
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Mulligan K, Scherer KR 2012. Toward a working definition of emotion. Emot. Rev. 4:4345–57
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Multon KD, Brown SD, Lent RW 1991. Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: a meta-analytic investigation. J. Couns. Psychol. 38:130–38
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Nagengast B, Marsh HW, Scalas LF, Xu MK, Hau KT, Trautwein U 2011. Who took the “×” out of expectancy-value theory? A psychological mystery, a substantive-methodological synergy, and a cross-national generalization. Psychol. Sci. 22:81058–66
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Nelissen RM, Dijker AJ, de Vries NK 2007. Emotions and goals: assessing relations between values and emotions. Cogn. Emot. 21:4902–11
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Neta M, Norris CJ, Whalen PJ 2009. Corrugator muscle responses are associated with individual differences in positivity-negativity bias. Emotion 9:5640–48
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Nieuwenhuis S, de Geus EJ, Aston-Jones G 2011. The anatomical and functional relationship between the P3 and autonomic components of the orienting response. Psychophysiology 48:2162–75
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Nordström H, Laukka P, Thingujam NS, Schubert E, Elfenbein HA 2017. Emotion appraisal dimensions inferred from vocal expressions are consistent across cultures: a comparison between Australia and India. R. Soc. Open Sci. 4:11170912
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Parkinson B 1997. Untangling the appraisal-emotion connection. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 1:62–79
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Parkinson B, Illingworth S 2009. Guilt in response to blame from others. Cogn. Emot. 23:1589–614
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Paulmann S, Furnes D, Bøkenes AM, Cozzolino PJ 2016. How psychological stress affects emotional prosody. PLOS ONE 11:11e0165022
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Pecchinenda A 2001. The psychophysiology of appraisals. Scherer et al. 2001 301–15
  103. Pecchinenda A, Smith CA 1996. The affective significance of skin conductance activity during a difficult problem-solving task. Cogn. Emot. 10:5481–503
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Reisenzein R, Horstmann G, Schützwohl A 2018. The cognitive-evolutionary model of surprise: a review of the evidence. Top. Cogn. Sci. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Richter M, Gendolla GHE 2009. The heart contracts to reward: monetary incentives and preejection period. Psychophysiology 46:3451–57
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Rügamer D, Brockhaus S, Gentsch K, Scherer KR, Greven S 2017. Boosting factor-specific functional historical models for the detection of synchronisation in bioelectrical signals. J. R. Stat. Soc. C 67:3621–42
    [Google Scholar]
  107. Schank JC, Miller ML, Smaldino PE 2017. The evolution of fair offers with low rejection thresholds in the ultimatum game. bioRxiv 162313
  108. Scherer KR 1986. Vocal affect expression: a review and a model for future research. Psychol. Bull. 99:2143–65
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Scherer KR 2001. Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking. Scherer et al. 2001 92–120
  110. Scherer KR 2009.a The dynamic architecture of emotion: evidence for the component process model. Cogn. Emot. 23:71307–51
    [Google Scholar]
  111. Scherer KR 2009.b Emotion theories and concepts (psychological perspectives). Oxford Companion to Emotion and the Affective Sciences D Sander, KR Scherer 145–49 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Scherer KR 2013. Emotion in action, interaction, music, and speech. Language, Music, and the Brain: A Mysterious Relationship MA Arbib 107–39 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
  113. Scherer KR, Clark-Polner E, Mortillaro M 2011. In the eye of the beholder? Universality and cultural specificity in the expression and perception of emotion. Int. J. Psychol. 46:6401–35
    [Google Scholar]
  114. Scherer KR, Ellgring H 2007. Are facial expressions of emotion produced by categorical affect programs or dynamically driven by appraisal. Emotion 7:1113–30
    [Google Scholar]
  115. Scherer KR, Fontaine JRF 2018. The semantic structure of emotion words across languages is consistent with componential appraisal models of emotion. Cogn. Emot. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  116. Scherer KR, Meuleman B 2013. Human emotion experiences can be predicted on theoretical grounds: evidence from verbal labeling. PLOS ONE 8:3e58166
    [Google Scholar]
  117. Scherer KR, Mortillaro M, Mehu M 2017. Facial expression is driven by appraisal and generates appraisal inference. The Science of Facial Expression JM Fernández-Dols, JA Russell 353–73 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  118. Scherer KR, Mortillaro M, Rotondi I, Sergi I, Trznadel S 2018. Appraisal-driven facial actions as building blocks for emotion inference. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 114:3358–79
    [Google Scholar]
  119. Scherer KR, Peper M 2001. Psychological theories of emotion and neuropsychological research. Handbook of Neuropsychology, Vol. 5: Emotional Behavior and Its Disorders F Boller, J Grafman 17–48 Amsterdam: Elsevier
    [Google Scholar]
  120. Scherer KR, Schorr A, Johnstone T, eds 2001. Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods, Research Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  121. Scherer KR, Wranik T, Sangsue J, Tran V, Scherer U 2004. Emotions in everyday life: probability of occurrence, risk factors, appraisal and reaction pattern. Soc. Sci. Inform. 43:4499–570
    [Google Scholar]
  122. Seligman MEP 1975. Helplessness: On Depression, Development, and Death San Francisco: Freeman
    [Google Scholar]
  123. Silvia PJ, Nusbaum EC, Eddington KM, Beaty RE, Kwapil TR 2014. Effort deficits and depression: the influence of anhedonic depressive symptoms on cardiac autonomic activity during a mental challenge. Motiv. Emot. 38:6779–89
    [Google Scholar]
  124. Smith CA, Kirby LD 2009. Relational antecedents of appraised problem-focused coping potential and its associated emotions. Cogn. Emot. 23:3481–503
    [Google Scholar]
  125. Smith PK, Bargh JA 2008. Nonconscious effects of power on basic approach and avoidance tendencies. Soc. Cogn. 26:11–24
    [Google Scholar]
  126. Stajkovic AD, Luthans F 1998. Self-efficacy and work-related performance: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 124:240–61
    [Google Scholar]
  127. Stekelenburg JJ, van Boxtel A 2002. Pericranial muscular, respiratory, and heart rate components of the orienting response. Psychophysiology 39:6707–22
    [Google Scholar]
  128. Sumpf M, Jentschke S, Koelsch S 2015. Effects of aesthetic chills on a cardiac signature of emotionality. PLOS ONE 10:6e0130117
    [Google Scholar]
  129. Talsma K, Schüz B, Schwarzer R, Norris K 2018. I believe, therefore I achieve (and vice versa): a meta-analytic cross-lagged panel analysis of self-efficacy and academic performance. Learn. Individ. Differ. 61:136–50
    [Google Scholar]
  130. Tomaka J, Blascovich J, Kelsey RM, Leitten CL 1993. Subjective, physiological, and behavioral effects of threat and challenge appraisal. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 65:2248–60
    [Google Scholar]
  131. Tomaka J, Blascovich J, Kibler J, Ernst JM 1997. Cognitive and physiological antecedents of threat and challenge appraisal. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 73:163–72
    [Google Scholar]
  132. Triscoli C, Croy I, Olausson H, Sailer U 2017. Touch between romantic partners: Being stroked is more pleasant than stroking and decelerates heart rate. Physiol. Behav. 177:169–75
    [Google Scholar]
  133. van Damme E, Binmore KG, Roth AE, Samuelson L, Winter E et al. 2014. How Werner Güth's ultimatum game shaped our understanding of social behavior. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 108:292–318
    [Google Scholar]
  134. van Reekum CM, Johnstone T, Banse R, Etter A, Wehrle T, Scherer KR 2004. Psychophysiological responses to appraisal dimensions in a computer game. Cogn. Emot. 18:5663–88
    [Google Scholar]
  135. Weinstein SE, Quigley KS 2006. Locus of control predicts appraisals and cardiovascular reactivity to a novel active coping task. J. Personal. 74:3911–31
    [Google Scholar]
  136. Wortman CB, Brehm JW 1975. Responses to uncontrollable outcomes: an integration of reactance theory and the learned helplessness model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 8 L Berkowitz 277–336 New York: Academic
    [Google Scholar]
  137. Wu L, Winkler MH, Andreatta M, Hajcak G, Pauli P 2012. Appraisal frames of pleasant and unpleasant pictures alter emotional responses as reflected in self-report and facial electromyographic activity. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 85:2224–29
    [Google Scholar]
  138. Zeelenberg M, Beattie J 1997. Consequences of regret aversion 2: additional evidence for effects of feedback on decision making. Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec. 72:163–78
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011854
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011854
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error