1932

Abstract

This review explores the effect of corporate environmental performance on financial performance. In particular, it reviews the empirical evidence on this effect. Conceptually, stronger environmental performance may lead to worse or better financial performance. The empirical literature generally finds a positive link from good environmental performance to financial success. However, many studies reveal a negative link. Given this mixed evidence, literature reviews and meta-analyses help to discern the conditions under which better environmental performance prompts financial success or disappointment. Similarly, this review organizes the empirical evidence by the specific measures of environmental performance and financial performance to discern which links are positive or negative. Lastly, the review identifies shortcomings in the empirical literature and offers suggestions for future research. For example, analyses should more fully explore the factors shaping the links from environmental to financial performance, such as firm size and economy type (e.g., mature market).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100517-023007
2018-10-05
2024-06-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/resource/10/1/annurev-resource-100517-023007.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100517-023007&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Albertini E 2013. Does environmental management improve financial performance? A meta-analytical review. Organ. Environ. 26:4431–57
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Tuwaijri SA, Christensen TE, Hughes KE 2004. The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: a simultaneous equations approach. Account. Organ. Soc. 29:5447–71
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ambec S, Lanoie P 2008. Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 22:445–62
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Amores-Salvadó J, Martín-de Castro G, Navas-López J 2014. Green corporate image: moderating the connection between environmental product innovation and firm performance. J. Clean. Prod. 83:356–65
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ann GE, Zailani S, Wahid NA 2006. A study on the impact of environmental management system (EMS) certification towards firms’ performance in Malaysia. Manag. Environ. Q. 17:173–93
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Aragón-Correa J, Hurtado-Torres N, Sharma S, García-Morales V 2008. Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: a resource-based perspective. J. Environ. Manag. 86:188–103
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Aragón-Correa J, Rubio-Lopez E 2007. Proactive corporate environmental strategies: myths and misunderstandings. Long Range Plan 40:3357–81
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Blackburn VL, Doran M, Shrader CB 1994. Investigating the dimensions of social responsibility and the consequences for corporate financial performance. J. Manag. Issues 6:195–212
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bosch JC, Eckard EW, Lee I 1998. EPA enforcement, firm response strategies, and stockholder wealth: an empirical examination. Manag. Decis. Econ. 19:3167–77
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Busch T, Hoffmann VH 2011. How hot is your bottom line? Linking carbon and financial performance. Bus. Soc. 50:2233–65
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cañón-de-Francia J, Garcés-Ayerbe C 2009. ISO 14001 environmental certification: A sign valued by the market. ? Environ. Resour. Econ. 44:2245–62
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Carmona-Moreno E, Céspedes-Lorente J, De Burgos-Jiménez J 2004. Environmental strategies in Spanish hotels: contextual factors and performance. Serv. Ind. J. 24:3101–30
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Christmann P 2000. Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: the role of complementary assets. Acad. Manag. J. 43:4663–80
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Clarkson PM, Li Y, Richardson GD 2004. The market valuation of environmental capital expenditures by pulp and paper companies. Account. Rev. 79:2329–53
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Clarkson PM, Li Y, Richardson GD, Vasvari FP 2011. Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies. J. Account. Public Policy 30:2122–44
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Clemens B 2006. Economic incentives and small firms: Does it pay to be green. ? J. Bus. Res. 59:4492–500
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Cohen M, Fenn S, Naimon J 1995. Environmental and financial performance: Are they related? Work. Pap., Vanderbilt Univ Nashville, TN:
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Cordeiro JJ, Sarkis J 1997. Environmental proactivism and firm performance: evidence from security analyst earnings forecasts. Bus. Strategy Environ. 6:2104–14
    [Google Scholar]
  19. de Burgos-Jiménez J, Vázquez-Brust D, Plaza-Úbeda J, Dijkshoorn J 2013. Environmental protection and financial performance: an empirical analysis in Wales. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 33:8981–1018
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Delmas M, Hoffmann VH, Kuss M 2011. Under the tip of the iceberg: absorptive capacity, environmental strategy, and competitive advantage. Bus. Soc. 50:1116–54
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Dixon-Fowler HR, Slater DJ, Johnson JL, Ellstrand AE, Romi AM 2013. Beyond “does it pay to be green?” A meta-analysis of moderators of the CEP–CFP relationship. J. Bus. Ethics 112:2353–66
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Dowell G, Hart S, Yeung B 2000. Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value. ? Manag. Sci. 46:81059–74
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Earnhart D, Lizal L 2007. Effect of pollution control on corporate financial performance in a transition economy. Environ. Policy Gov. 17:247–66
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Earnhart D, Segerson K 2012. The influence of financial status on the effectiveness of environmental enforcement. J. Public Econ. 96:670–84
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Elsayed K, Paton D 2005. The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: static and dynamic panel data evidence. Struct. Change Econ. Dyn. 16:3395–412
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Endrikat J, Guenther E, Hoppe H 2014. Making sense of conflicting empirical findings: a meta-analytic review of the relationship between corporate environmental and financial performance. Eur. Manag. J. 32:5735–51
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Fama EF, French KR 1992. The cross-section of expected stock returns. J. Financ. 47:427–65
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Filbeck G, Gorman RF 2004. The relationship between the environmental and financial performance of public utilities. Environ. Resour. Econ. 29:2137–57
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Freedman M, Patten DM 2004. Evidence on the pernicious effect of financial report environmental disclosure. Account. Forum 28:127–41
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Friede G, Busch T, Bassen A 2015. ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. J. Sustain. Financ. Invest. 5:4210–33
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Galdeano-Gómez E 2008. Does an endogenous relationship exist between environmental and economic performance? A resource-based view on the horticultural sector. Environ. Resour. Econ. 40:173–89
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Gil M, Jiménez J, Lorente J 2001. An analysis of environmental management, organizational context and performance of Spanish hotels. Omega 29:6457–71
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Gilley KM, Worrell DL, Davidson WN 3rd, El-Jelly A 2000. Corporate environmental initiatives and anticipated firm performance: the differential effects of process-driven versus product-driven greening initiatives. J. Manag. 26:61199–216
    [Google Scholar]
  34. González-Benito J, González-Benito Ó 2005. Environmental proactivity and business performance: an empirical analysis. Omega 33:11–15
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Goyal P, Rahman Z, Kazmi AA 2013. Corporate sustainability performance and firm performance research: literature review and future research agenda. Manag. Decis. 51:2361–79
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Griffin JJ, Mahon JF 1997. The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: twenty-five years of incomparable research. Bus. Soc. 36:15–31
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Hamilton JT 1995. Pollution as news: media and stock market reactions to the toxics release inventory data. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 28:198–113
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Hang M, Geyer-Klingeberg J, Rathgeber A, Stöckl S 2017. Economic development matters: a meta-regression analysis on the relation between environmental management and financial performance. J. Ind. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12573
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  39. Hart SL, Ahuja G 1996. Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Bus. Strategy Environ. 5:130–37
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Hassel L, Nilsson H, Nyquist S 2005. The value relevance of environmental performance. Eur. Account. Rev. 14:141–61
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Heras-Saizarbitoria I, Molina-Azorín JF, Dick GPM 2011. ISO 14001 certification and financial performance: selection-effect versus treatment-effect. J. Clean. Prod. 19:11–12
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Horváthová E 2010. Does environmental performance affect financial performance? A meta-analysis. Ecol. Econ. 70:152–59
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Horváthová E 2012. The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: Short-term costs and long-term benefits. ? Ecol. Econ. 84:91–97
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Iwata H, Okada K 2011. How does environmental performance affect financial performance? Evidence from Japanese manufacturing firms. Ecol. Econ. 70:91691–700
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Jacobs BW, Singhal VR, Subramanian R 2010. An empirical investigation of environmental performance and the market value of the firm. J. Oper. Manag. 28:5430–41
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Jaggi B, Freedman M 1992. An examination of the impact of pollution performance on economic and market performance: pulp and paper firms. J. Bus. Finance Account. 19:5697–713
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Judge WQ, Douglas TJ 1998. Performance implications of incorporating natural environmental issues into the strategic planning process: an empirical assessment. J. Manag. Stud. 35:2241–62
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Karagozoglu N, Lindell M 2000. Environmental management: testing the win-win model. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 43:6817–29
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Khanna M, Damon LA 1999. EPA's voluntary 33/50 program: impact on toxic releases and economic performance of firms. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 37:11–25
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Khanna M, Quimio WRH, Bojilova D 1998. Toxics release information: a policy tool for environmental protection. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 36:3243–66
    [Google Scholar]
  51. King AA, Lenox MJ 2001. Does it really pay to be green? An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance. J. Ind. Ecol. 5:1105–16
    [Google Scholar]
  52. King AA, Lenox MJ 2002. Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Manag. Sci. 48:2289–99
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Klassen RD, McLaughlin CP 1996. The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Manag. Sci. 42:81199–214
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Klassen RD, Whybark DC 1999. The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Acad. Manag. J. 42:6599–615
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Konar S, Cohen MA 2001. Does the market value environmental performance. ? Rev. Econ. Stat. 83:2281–89
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Laplante B, Lanoie P 1994. The market response to environmental incidents in Canada: a theoretical and empirical analysis. South. Econ. J. 25:657–72
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Leonidou LC, Christodoulides P, Thwaites D 2016. External determinants and financial outcomes of an eco-friendly orientation in smaller manufacturing firms. J. Small Bus. Manag. 54:15–25
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Link S, Naveh E 2006. Standardization and discretion: does the environmental standard ISO 14001 lead to performance benefits. ? IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 53:4508–19
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Lu W, Chau K, Wang H, Pan W 2014. A decade's debate on the nexus between corporate social and corporate financial performance: a critical review of empirical studies 2002–2011. J. Clean. Prod. 79:195–206
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Lucas MT, Noordewier TG 2016. Environmental management practices and firm financial performance: the moderating effect of industry pollution-related factors. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 175:24–34
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Makni R, Francoeur C, Bellavance F 2009. Causality between corporate social performance and financial performance: evidence from Canadian firms. J. Bus. Ethics 89:3409–22
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Margolis J, Elfenbein H, Walsh J 2009. Does it pay to be good and does it matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Work. Pap., Univ. Calif Los Angeles:
  63. McPeak C, Devirian J, Seaman S 2010. Do environmentally friendly companies outperform the market. ? J. Glob. Bus. Issues 4:161–69
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Menguc B, Ozanne LK 2005. Challenges of the “green imperative”: a natural resource-based approach to the environmental orientation–business performance relationship. J. Bus. Res. 58:4430–38
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Miroshnychenko I, Barontini R, Testa F 2017. Green practices and financial performance: a global outlook. J. Clean. Prod. 147:340–51
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Molina-Azorín J, Claver-Cortés E, López-Gamero M, Tarí J 2009. Green management and financial performance: a literature review. Manag. Decis. 47:71080–100
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Montabon F, Sroufe R, Narasimhan R 2007. An examination of corporate reporting, environmental management practices and firm performance. J. Oper. Manag. 25:5998–1014
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Muhammad N, Scrimgeour F, Reddy K, Abidin S 2015. The relationship between environmental performance and financial performance in periods of growth and contraction: evidence from Australian publicly listed companies. J. Clean. Prod. 102:324–32
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Muoghalu MI, Robinson HD, Glascock JL 1990. Hazardous waste lawsuits, stockholder returns, and deterrence. South. Econ. J. 22:357–70
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Murray A, Sinclair D, Power D, Gray R 2006. Do financial markets care about social and environmental disclosure? Further evidence and exploration from the UK. Account. Audit. Account. J. 19:2228–55
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Nakao Y, Amano A, Matsumura K, Genba K, Nakano M 2007. Relationship between environmental performance and financial performance: an empirical analysis of Japanese corporations. Bus. Strategy Environ. 16:2106–18
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Nehrt C 1996. Timing and intensity effects of environmental investments. Strateg. Manag. J. 17:7535–47
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Nishitani K, Kaneko S, Fujii H, Komatsu S 2011. Effects of the reduction of pollution emissions on the economic performance of firms: an empirical analysis focusing on demand and productivity. J. Clean. Prod. 19:171956–64
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Pereira-Moliner J, Font X, Tarí J, Molina-Azorin J, Lopez-Gamero M, Pertusa-Ortega E 2015. The Holy Grail: environmental management, competitive advantage and business performance in the Spanish hotel industry. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 27:5714–38
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Przychodzen J, Przychodzen W 2015. Relationships between eco-innovation and financial performance–evidence from publicly traded companies in Poland and Hungary. J. Clean. Prod. 90:253–63
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Qiu Y, Shaukat A, Tharyan R 2016. Environmental and social disclosures: link with corporate financial performance. Br. Account. Rev. 48:1102–16
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Rexhäuser S, Rammer C 2014. Environmental innovations and firm profitability: unmasking the Porter hypothesis. Environ. Resour. Econ. 57:1145–67
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Russo MV, Fouts PA 1997. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Acad. Manag. J. 40:3534–59
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Sharma S, Vredenburg H 1998. Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strateg. Manag. J. 10:2729–53
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Wagner M 2005. How to reconcile environmental and economic performance to improve corporate sustainability: corporate environmental strategies in the European paper industry. J. Environ. Manag. 76:2105–18
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Wagner M, Schaltegger S 2004. The effect of corporate environmental strategy choice and environmental performance on competitiveness and economic performance: an empirical study of EU manufacturing. Eur. Manag. J. 22:5557–72
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Wagner M, Van Phu N, Azomahou T, Wehrmeyer W 2002. The relationship between the environmental and economic performance of firms: an empirical analysis of the European paper industry. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 9:3133–46
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Wahba H 2008. Does the market value corporate environmental responsibility? An empirical examination. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 15:289–99
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Watson K, Klingenberg B, Polito T, Geurts T 2004. Impact of environmental management system implementation on financial performance: a comparison of two corporate strategies. Manag. Environ. Q. 15:6622–28
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Yu V, Ting H, Jim Wu Y 2009. Assessing the greenness effort for European firms: a resource efficiency perspective. Manag. Decis. 47:71065–79
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Zeng S, Meng X, Yin H, Tam C, Sun L 2010. Impact of cleaner production on business performance. J. Clean. Prod. 18:10975–83
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100517-023007
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100517-023007
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error