1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Sociology
  4. Volume 50, 2024
  5. Article

Annual Review of Sociology

Volume 50, 2024

“Which Cases Do I Need?” Constructing Cases and Observations in Qualitative Research

Abstract

This methodological review starts one step before Small's classic account of how many cases a scholar needs. We ask, “Which cases do I need?” We argue that a core feature of most qualitative research is case construction, which we define as the delineation of a social category of inquiry. We outline how qualitative researchers construct cases and observations and discuss how these choices impact data collection, analysis, and argumentation. In particular, we examine how case construction and the subsequent logic of crafting observations within cases have consequences for conceptual generalizability, as distinct from empirical generalizability. Drawing from the practice of qualitative work, we outline seven questions qualitative researchers often answer to construct cases and observations. Better understanding and articulating the logic of constructing cases and observations is useful for both qualitative scholars embarking on research and those who read and evaluate their work.

Keyword(s): case selection, ethnography, interviews, qualitative methods, research design, research methods, sampling
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-031021-035000
2024-08-12
2025-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/soc/50/1/annurev-soc-031021-035000.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-031021-035000&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adjepong A. 2019.. Invading ethnography: a queer of color reflexive practice. . Ethnography 20::27–46
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexander JT, Andersen R, Cookson PW, Edin KJ, Fisher J, et al. 2017.. A qualitative census of rural and urban poverty. . Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 672::143–61
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson E. 1978.. A Place on the Corner. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson E. 1992.. Streetwise: Race, Class, and Change in an Urban Community. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Auyero J. 2012.. Patients of the State: The Politics of Waiting in Argentina. Durham, NC:: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Auyero J, ed. 2015.. Invisible in Austin: Life and Labor in an American City. Austin:: Univ. of Texas Press
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Averett KH. 2016.. The gender buffet: LGBTQ parents resisting heteronormativity. . Gend. Soc. 30::189–212
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  8. Becker HS. 1992.. Cases, causes, conjunctures, stories, and imagery. . In What Is a Case?: Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry, ed. CC Ragin, HS Becker , pp. 205–16. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Becker HS. 1998.. Tricks of the Trade: How to Think About Your Research While You're Doing It. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Benzecry CE, Deener A, Lara-Millán A. 2020.. Archival work as qualitative sociology. . Qual. Sociol. 43:(3):297–303
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  11. Besbris M. 2020.. Upsold: Real Estate Agents, Prices, and Neighborhood Inequality. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Besbris M, Khan S. 2017.. Less theory. More description. . Sociol. Theory 35::147–53
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  13. Besbris M, Korver-Glenn E. 2023.. Value fluidity and value anchoring: race, intermediaries and valuation in two housing markets. . Socio-Econ. Rev. 21:(1):79–98
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bettie J. 2002.. Exceptions to the rule: upwardly mobile white and Mexican American high school girls. . Gend. Soc. 16::403–22
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bhatt AM, Goldberg A, Srivastava SB. 2022.. A language-based method for assessing symbolic boundary maintenance between social groups. . Sociol. Methods Res. 51:(4):1681–720
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  16. Blair-Loy M. 2005.. Competing Devotions: Career and Family Among Women Executives. Cambridge, MA:: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Blumer H. 1954.. What's wrong with social theory?. Am. Sociol. Rev. 18::3–10
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  18. Bourdieu P. 1991.. Craft of Sociology: Epistemological Preliminaries. New York:: de Gruyter
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Bourdieu P. 1992.. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Bourgois P. 1995.. In Search of Respect: Selling Crack in El Barrio. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Brown-Saracino J. 2017.. How Places Make Us: Novel LBQ Identities in Four Small Cities. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Burawoy M. 1982.. Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process Under Monopoly Capitalism. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Charmaz K. 2006.. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA:: SAGE
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Chen KK. 2009.. Enabling Creative Chaos: The Organization Behind the Burning Man Event. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Choo HY, Ferree MM. 2010.. Practicing intersectionality in sociological research: a critical analysis of inclusions, interactions, and institutions in the study of inequalities. . Sociol. Theory 28::129–49
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  26. Clair M. 2020.. Privilege and Punishment: How Race and Class Matter in Criminal Court. Princeton, NJ:: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Collins C. 2019.. Making Motherhood Work: How Women Manage Careers and Caregiving. Princeton, NJ:: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Collins PH. 1986.. Learning from the outsider within: the sociological significance of Black feminist thought. . Soc. Probl. 33::14–32
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  29. Collins PH. 1999.. Reflections on the outsider within. . J. Career Dev. 26::85–88
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Collins PH. 2000.. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York:: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Compton DR, Meadow T, Schilt K, eds. 2018.. Other, Please Specify: Queer Methods in Sociology. Berkeley:: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Connell C. 2022.. A Few Good Gays: The Gendered Compromises Behind Military Inclusion. Berkeley:: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Cooper M. 2014.. Cut Adrift: Families in Insecure Times. Berkeley:: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Correll SJ. 2014.. Causal claims and ethical concerns: the why and when of laboratory experiments. . In The Practice of Social Research: How Social Scientists Answer Their Questions, ed. S Kahn, DR Fisher , pp. 41–49. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Couper MP. 2017.. New developments in survey data collection. . Annu. Rev. Sociol. 43::121–45
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  36. Crenshaw K. 1991.. Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. . Stanf. Law Rev. 43::1241–99
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  37. Damaske S. 2011.. For the Family?: How Class and Gender Shape Women's Work. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Davis G. 2015.. Contesting Intersex: The Dubious Diagnosis. New York:: NYU Press
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Deener A. 2012.. Venice: A Contested Bohemia in Los Angeles. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Desmond M. 2014.. Relational ethnography. . Theory Soc. 43::547–79
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  41. Desmond M. 2016.. Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City. New York:: Crown
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Deterding NM, Waters MC. 2021.. Flexible coding of in-depth interviews: a twenty-first-century approach. . Sociol. Methods Res. 50::708–39
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  43. Dohan D, Sánchez-Jankowski M. 1998.. Using computers to analyze ethnographic field data: theoretical and practical considerations. . Annu. Rev. Sociol. 24::477–98
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  44. Dow D. 2019.. Mothering While Black: Boundaries and Burdens of Middle-Class Parenthood. Berkeley:: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Duneier M. 1992.. Slim's Table: Race, Respectability, and Masculinity. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Duneier M. 1999.. Sidewalk. New York:: Farrar, Straus and Giroux
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Edelmann A, Wolff T, Montagne D, Bail CA. 2020.. Computational social science and sociology. . Annu. Rev. Sociol. 46::61–81
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  48. Ehrenreich B. 2011.. Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America. New York:: Picador
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Ellis R. 2023.. In This Place Called Prison: Women's Religious Life in the Shadow of Punishment. Berkeley:: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Elman C, Gerring J, Mahoney J. 2016.. Case study research: putting the quant into the qual. . Sociol. Methods Res. 45::375–91
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  51. Emigh RJ. 1997.. The power of negative thinking: the use of negative case methodology in the development of sociological theory. . Theory Soc. 26::649–84
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  52. Emirbayer M. 1997.. Manifesto for a relational sociology. . Am. J. Sociol. 103::281–317
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  53. Ermakoff I. 2014.. Exceptional cases: epistemic contributions and normative expectations. . Eur. J. Sociol. Arch. Eur. Sociol. 55::223–43
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  54. Fine GA. 1993.. Ten lies of ethnography: moral dilemmas of field research. . J. Contemp. Ethnogr. 22:(3):267–94
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  55. Flyvbjerg B. 2006.. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. . Qual. Inq. 12::219–45
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  56. Gans HJ. 1982.. Urban Villagers: Group and Class in the Life of Italian-Americans. New York:: Free Press
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Gerson K, Damaske S. 2020.. The Science and Art of Interviewing. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Glaser B, Strauss A. 2017 (1967).. Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York:: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Golden-Biddle K, Locke K. 1993.. Appealing work: an investigation of how ethnographic texts convince. . Org. Sci. 4:(4):595–616
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  60. González-López G. 2015.. Family Secrets: Stories of Incest and Sexual Violence in Mexico. New York:: NYU Press
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Gowan T. 2010.. Hobos, Hustlers, and Backsliders: Homeless in San Francisco. Minneapolis:: Univ. Minn. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Grodal S, Anteby M, Holm AL. 2021.. Achieving rigor in qualitative analysis: the role of active categorization in theory building. . Acad. Manag. Rev. 46:(3):591–612
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  63. Hanson R, Richards P. 2019.. Harassed: Gender, Bodies, and Ethnographic Research. Berkeley:: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Hanson R, Richards P. 2022.. Towards an embodied analysis of the academic field. . J. Men's Stud. 30::321–30
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  65. Haynes B, Solovitch S. 2017.. Down the Up Staircase: Three Generations of a Harlem Family. New York:: Columbia Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Heckathorn DD, Cameron CJ. 2017.. Network sampling: from snowball and multiplicity to respondent-driven sampling. . Annu. Rev. Sociol. 43::101–19
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  67. Hirsch JS, Khan S. 2020.. Sexual Citizens: A Landmark Study of Sex, Power, and Assault on Campus. New York:: W.W. Norton & Co.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Hoang KK. 2022.. Spiderweb Capitalism: How Global Elites Exploit Frontier Markets. Princeton, NJ:: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Jackson M, Cox DR. 2013.. The principles of experimental design and their application in sociology. . Annu. Rev. Sociol. 39::27–49
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  70. Jensen K. 2023.. The Color of Asylum: The Racial Politics of Safe Haven in Brazil. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Jensen K, Auyero J. 2019.. Teaching and learning the craft: the construction of ethnographic objects. . In Research in Urban Sociology: Legacies and Challenges, ed. RE Ocejo , pp. 69–87. Bingley, UK:: Emerald
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Jerolmack C, Khan S. 2017.. The analytic lenses of ethnography. . Socius 3:. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023117735256
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  73. Jerolmack C, Khan S. 2018.. Approaches to Ethnography: Analysis and Representation in Participant Observation. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Kalleberg AL. 2009.. Precarious work, insecure workers: employment relations in transition. . Am. Sociol. Rev. 74::1–22
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  75. Katz J. 1997.. Ethnography's warrants. . Sociol. Methods Res. 25::391–423
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  76. Katz J. 2002.. From how to why: on luminous description and causal inference in ethnography. (part 2). Ethnography 3::63–90
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  77. Khan S. 2011.. Privilege: The Making of an Adolescent Elite at St. Paul's School. Princeton, NJ:: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  78. King G, Keohane RO, Verba S. 1994.. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ:: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Knorr Centina K. 1999.. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA:: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Lamont M. 1992.. Money, Morals, and Manners: The Culture of the French and the American Upper-Middle Class. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Lareau A. 2003.. Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life. Berkeley:: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Lareau A. 2012.. Using the terms “hypothesis” and “variable” for qualitative work: a critical reflection. . J. Marriage Fam. 74::671–77
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  83. Lareau A. 2021.. Listening to People: A Practical Guide to Interviewing, Participant Observation, Data Analysis, and Writing It All Up. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Lareau A, Rao AH. 2022.. Intensive family observations: a methodological guide. . Sociol. Methods Res. 51::1969–2022
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  85. Lazer D, Radford J. 2017.. Data ex machina: introduction to big data. . Annu. Rev. Sociol. 43::19–39
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  86. Leidner R. 1993.. Fast Food, Fast Talk: Service Work and the Routinization of Everyday Life. Berkeley:: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Littlejohn K. 2021.. Just Get on the Pill: The Uneven Burden of Reproductive Politics. Berkeley:: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Lorber J. 1993.. Believing is seeing: biology as ideology. . Gend. Soc. 7::568–81
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  89. Luker K. 2008.. Salsa Dancing into the Social Sciences: Research in an Age of Info-Glut. Cambridge, MA:: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Mahoney J, Goertz G. 2006.. A tale of two cultures: contrasting quantitative and qualitative research. . Political Anal. 14::227–49
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  91. Mayrl D, Wilson NH. 2020.. What do historical sociologists do all day? Analytic architectures in historical sociology. . Am. J. Sociol. 125:(5):1345–94
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  92. McCall L. 2005.. The complexity of intersectionality. . Signs 30::1771–800
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  93. McDermott M. 2006.. Working-Class White: The Making and Unmaking of Race Relations. Berkeley:: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Meadow T. 2018.. Trans Kids: Being Gendered in the Twenty-First Century. Berkeley:: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Mickey E. 2019.. When gendered logics collide: going public and restructuring in a high-tech organization. . Gend. Soc. 33:(4):509–33
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  96. Misra J, Walters K. 2022.. Walking Mannequins: How Race and Gender Inequalities Shape Retail Clothing Work. Berkeley:: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Mitchell JC. 1983.. Case and situation analysis. . Sociol. Rev. 31::187–211
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  98. Moore M. 2011.. Invisible Families: Gay Identities, Relationships, and Motherhood Among Black Women. Berkeley:: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Moore MR. 2012.. Intersectionality and the study of black, sexual minority women. . Gend. Soc. 26::33–39
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  100. Musto M. 2019.. Brilliant or bad: the gendered social construction of exceptionalism in early adolescence. . Am. Sociol. Rev. 84::369–93
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  101. Naderi P, Wendel-Hummell C, Lareau A, Mooney MK, Wang J. 2010.. Interview with Annette Lareau. . Soc. Thought Res. 31::3–13
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Neely MT. 2022.. Hedged Out: Inequality and Insecurity on Wall Street. Berkeley:: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Nelson LK. 2020.. Computational grounded theory: a methodological framework. . Sociol. Methods Res. 49:(1):3–42
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  104. Pacewicz J. 2022.. What can you do with a single case? How to think about ethnographic case selection like a historical sociologist. . Sociol. Methods Res. 51::931–62
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  105. Pascoe CJ. 2007.. Dude You're a Fag: Masculinity and Sexuality in High School. Berkeley:: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Pattillo M. 1999.. Black Picket Fences: Privilege and Peril Among the Black Middle Class. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Pfeffer C. 2016.. Queering Families: The Postmodern Partnerships of Cisgender Women and Transgender Men. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Pfeffer C. 2018.. Queer accounting: methodological investments and disinvestments. . In Other, Please Specify: Queer Methods in Sociology, ed. DR Compton, T Meadow, K Schilt , pp. 304–25. Berkeley:: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Pugh AJ. 2015.. The Tumbleweed Society: Working and Caring in an Age of Insecurity. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Ragin CC. 1992a.. Cases of “What is a case?. ” In What Is a Case?: Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry, ed. CC Ragin, HS Becker , pp. 1–18. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Ragin CC. 1992b.. “ Casing” and the process of social inquiry. . In What Is a Case?: Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry, ed. CC Ragin, HS Becker , pp. 217–26. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Ragin CC, Becker HS. 1992.. What Is a Case?: Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Rao AH. 2020.. Crunch Time: How Married Couples Confront Unemployment. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Reich A, Bearman P. 2018.. Working for Respect: Community and Conflict at Walmart. New York:: Columbia Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Reich JA. 2021.. Power, positionality, and the ethic of care in qualitative research. . Qual. Sociol. 44::575–81
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  116. Reyes V. 2020.. Ethnographic toolkit: strategic positionality and researchers’ visible and invisible tools in field research. . Ethnography 21::220–40
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  117. Rivera L. 2015.. Pedigree: How Elite Students Get Elite Jobs. Princeton, NJ:: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Robinson BA. 2020.. Coming Out to the Streets. Berkeley:: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Robinson BA. 2022.. Non-binary embodiment, queer knowledge production, and disrupting the cisnormative field: notes from a trans ethnographer. . J. Men's Stud. 30::425–45
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  120. Rudrappa S. 2015.. Discounted Life: The Price of Global Surrogacy in India. New York:: NYU Press
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Schilt K. 2010.. Just One of the Guys? Transgender Men and the Persistence of Gender Inequality. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Shestakofsky B. 2024.. Behind the Startup: How Venture Capital Shapes Work, Innovation, and Inequality. Berkeley:: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  123. Small ML. 2009.. ‘ How many cases do I need?’: on science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. . Ethnography 10::5–38
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  124. Small ML. 2017.. Someone to Talk To. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Small ML. 2022.. Ethnography upgraded. . Qual. Sociol. 45:(3):477–82
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  126. Small ML, Calarco JM. 2022.. Qualitative Literacy: A Guide to Evaluating Ethnographic and Interview Research. Berkeley:: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Smith DE. 1987.. The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Toronto:: Univ. Toronto Press
     [Google Scholar]
  128. Smith LT. 1999.. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London:: Zed
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Sobering K. 2022.. The People's Hotel: Working for Justice in Argentina. Durham, NC:: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  130. Steele S. 1991.. The Content of Our Character: A New Vision of Race in America. New York:: HarperCollins
     [Google Scholar]
  131. Stockstill C. 2023.. False Starts: The Segregated Lives of Preschoolers. New York:: NYU Press
     [Google Scholar]
  132. Streib J. 2020.. Privilege Lost: Who Leaves the Upper Middle Class and How They Fall. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  133. Stuart F. 2016.. Down, Out, and Under Arrest: Policing and Everyday Life in Skid Row. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  134. Stuart F. 2017.. Introspection, positionality, and the self as a research instrument toward a model of abductive reflexivity. . In Approaches to Ethnography: Analysis and Representation in Participant Observation, ed. C Jerolmack, S Khan , pp. 211–37. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  135. Stuart F. 2020.. Ballad of the Bullet: Gangs, Drill Music, and the Power of Online Infamy. Princeton, NJ:: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  136. Sullivan E. 2018.. Manufactured Insecurity: Mobile Home Parks and Americans’ Tenuous Right to Place. Berkeley:: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  137. Tavory I, Timmermans S. 2014.. Abductive Analysis: Theorizing Qualitative Research. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  138. Timmermans S, Tavory I. 2022.. Data Analysis in Qualitative Research: Theorizing with Abductive Analysis. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  139. Travers A. 2018.. The Trans Generation: How Trans Kids (and Their Parents) Are Creating a Gender Revolution. New York:: NYU Press
     [Google Scholar]
  140. Van Cleve NG. 2017.. Crook County: Racism and Injustice in America's Largest Criminal Court. Stanford, CA:: Stanford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  141. Vaughan D. 1997.. The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  142. Vaughan D. 1998.. Rational choice, situated action, and the social control of organizations. . Law Soc. Rev. 32:(1):23–61
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  143. Vaughan D. 2008.. Bourdieu and organizations: the empirical challenge. . Theory Soc. 37::65–81
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  144. Vaughan D. 2014.. Analogy, cases, and comparative social organization. . In Theorizing in Social Science: The Context of Discovery, ed. R Svedberg , pp. 61–84. Stanford, CA:: Stanford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  145. Ward J. 2010.. Gender labor: transmen, femmes, and collective work of transgression. . Sexualities 13::236–54
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  146. Whyte WF. 1993.. Street Corner Society: The Social Structure of an Italian Slum. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  147. Williams CL. 2006.. Inside Toyland: Working, Shopping, and Social Inequality. Berkeley:: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  148. Williams CL. 2021.. Gaslighted: How the Oil and Gas Industry Shortchanges Women Scientists. Berkeley:: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  149. Williams CL, Heikes JE. 1993.. The importance of researcher's gender in the in-depth interview: evidence from two case studies of male nurses. . Gend. Soc. 7::280–91
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  150. Wilson WJ. 1978.. The Declining Significance of Race: Blacks and Changing American Institutions. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  151. Wingfield AH. 2023.. Gray Areas: How the Way We Work Perpetuates Inequality and What We Can Do to Fix It. New York:: Harper Collins
     [Google Scholar]
  152. Yin RK. 2013.. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Los Angeles:: SAGE
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-031021-035000
Loading
“Which Cases Do I Need?” Constructing Cases and Observations in Qualitative Research
Annual Review of Sociology 50, 21 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-031021-035000
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-031021-035000
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-031021-035000
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error