1932

Abstract

Studies over more than half a century have resulted in what some consider a complete narrative for the life cycle of bacteriophage λ. However, this narrative is only complete within the limited resolution offered by the traditional genetic and biochemical approaches that were used to create it. A recent series of studies performed at the single-cell and single-phage levels has revealed a wealth of previously unknown features. By pointing to many open questions, these new studies highlight the limitations of our current understanding of λ, but they also initiate the process of forming a more detailed and quantitative narrative for the system.

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
Single-Cell Studies of Phage λ: Hidden Treasures Under Occam's Rug: Video 3

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
Single-Cell Studies of Phage λ: Hidden Treasures Under Occam's Rug: Video 5

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
Single-Cell Studies of Phage λ: Hidden Treasures Under Occam's Rug: Video 6

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
Single-Cell Studies of Phage λ: Hidden Treasures Under Occam's Rug: Video 1

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
Single-Cell Studies of Phage λ: Hidden Treasures Under Occam's Rug: Video 2

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
Single-Cell Studies of Phage λ: Hidden Treasures Under Occam's Rug: Video 8

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
Single-Cell Studies of Phage λ: Hidden Treasures Under Occam's Rug: Video 7

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
Single-Cell Studies of Phage λ: Hidden Treasures Under Occam's Rug: Video 4
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-virology-110615-042127
2016-09-29
2024-06-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/virology/3/1/annurev-virology-110615-042127.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-virology-110615-042127&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Cairns J, Stent GS, Watson JD. 1.  2007. Phage and the Origins of Molecular Biology Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press [Google Scholar]
  2. Casjens SR, Hendrix RW. 2.  2015. Bacteriophage lambda: early pioneer and still relevant. Virology 479:310–30 [Google Scholar]
  3. Hendrix RW. 3.  1983. Lambda II Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press [Google Scholar]
  4. Hershey AD. 4.  1971. The Bacteriophage Lambda Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press [Google Scholar]
  5. Ptashne M. 5.  2004. A Genetic Switch: Phage Lambda Revisited Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press [Google Scholar]
  6. Ptashne M. 6.  1992. A Genetic Switch: Phage λ and Higher Organisms Cambridge, MA: Cell Press [Google Scholar]
  7. Bustamante C. 7.  2008. In singulo biochemistry: when less is more. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 77:45–50 [Google Scholar]
  8. Edgar R, Rokney A, Feeney M, Semsey S, Kessel M. 8.  et al. 2008. Bacteriophage infection is targeted to cellular poles. Mol. Microbiol. 68:1107–16 [Google Scholar]
  9. Rothenberg E, Sepúlveda LA, Skinner SO, Zeng L, Selvin PR, Golding I. 9.  2011. Single-virus tracking reveals a spatial receptor-dependent search mechanism. Biophys. J. 100:2875–82 [Google Scholar]
  10. Van Valen D, Wu D, Chen Y, Tuson H, Wiggins P, Phillips R. 10.  2012. A single-molecule Hershey-Chase experiment. Curr. Biol. 22:1339–43 [Google Scholar]
  11. Tal A, Arbel-Goren R, Costantino N, Court DL, Stavans J. 11.  2014. Location of the unique integration site on an Escherichia coli chromosome by bacteriophage lambda DNA in vivo. PNAS 111:7308–12 [Google Scholar]
  12. Zeng L, Skinner SO, Zong C, Sippy J, Feiss M, Golding I. 12.  2010. Decision making at a subcellular level determines the outcome of bacteriophage infection. Cell 141:682–91 [Google Scholar]
  13. St-Pierre F, Endy D. 13.  2008. Determination of cell fate selection during phage lambda infection. PNAS 105:20705–10 [Google Scholar]
  14. Zong C, So L, Sepúlveda LA, Skinner SO, Golding I. 14.  2010. Lysogen stability is determined by the frequency of activity bursts from the fate-determining gene. Mol. Syst. Biol. 6:440 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bednarz M, Halliday JA, Herman C, Golding I. 15.  2014. Revisiting bistability in the lysis/lysogeny circuit of bacteriophage lambda. PLOS ONE 9:e100876 [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen Y, Golding I, Sawai S, Guo L, Cox EC. 16.  2005. Population fitness and the regulation of Escherichia coli genes by bacterial viruses. PLOS Biol. 3:e229 [Google Scholar]
  17. Liu X, Jiang H, Gu Z, Roberts JW. 17.  2013. High-resolution view of bacteriophage lambda gene expression by ribosome profiling. PNAS 110:11928–33 [Google Scholar]
  18. Golding I. 18.  2011. Decision making in living cells: lessons from a simple system. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 40:63–80 [Google Scholar]
  19. Ray LB. 19.  2013. Cells go solo. Science 342:1187 [Google Scholar]
  20. Xie XS, Choi PJ, Li G, Lee NK, Lia G. 20.  2008. Single-molecule approach to molecular biology in living bacterial cells. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 37:417–44 [Google Scholar]
  21. Amir A, Kobiler O, Rokney A, Oppenheim AB, Stavans J. 21.  2007. Noise in timing and precision of gene activities in a genetic cascade. Mol. Syst. Biol. 3:71 [Google Scholar]
  22. Dennehy JJ, Wang I. 22.  2011. Factors influencing lysis time stochasticity in bacteriophage λ. BMC Microbiol. 11:174 [Google Scholar]
  23. Little JW, Shepley DP, Wert DW. 23.  1999. Robustness of a gene regulatory circuit. EMBO J. 18:4299–307 [Google Scholar]
  24. Zaslaver A, Bren A, Ronen M, Itzkovitz S, Kikoin I. 24.  et al. 2006. A comprehensive library of fluorescent transcriptional reporters for Escherichia coli. Nat. Methods 3:623–28 [Google Scholar]
  25. Friedman N, Vardi S, Ronen M, Alon U, Stavans J. 25.  2005. Precise temporal modulation in the response of the SOS DNA repair network in individual bacteria. PLOS Biol. 3:e238 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kobiler O, Rokney A, Friedman N, Court DL, Stavans J, Oppenheim AB. 26.  2005. Quantitative kinetic analysis of the bacteriophage λ genetic network. PNAS 102:4470–75 [Google Scholar]
  27. Rokney A, Kobiler O, Amir A, Court DL, Stavans J. 27.  et al. 2008. Host responses influence on the induction of lambda prophage. Mol. Microbiol. 68:29–36 [Google Scholar]
  28. Bæk K, Svenningsen S, Eisen H, Sneppen K, Brown S. 28.  2003. Single-cell analysis of λ immunity regulation. J. Mol. Biol. 334:363–72 [Google Scholar]
  29. Raj A, van Oudenaarden A. 29.  2009. Single-molecule approaches to stochastic gene expression. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 38:255–70 [Google Scholar]
  30. Bertrand E, Chartrand P, Schaefer M, Shenoy SM, Singer RH, Long RM. 30.  1998. Localization of ASH1 mRNA particles in living yeast. Mol. Cell 2:437–45 [Google Scholar]
  31. Golding I, Paulsson J, Zawilski SM, Cox EC. 31.  2005. Real-time kinetics of gene activity in individual bacteria. Cell 123:1025–36 [Google Scholar]
  32. Raj A, van den Bogaard P, Rifkin SA, van Oudenaarden A, Tyagi S. 32.  2008. Imaging individual mRNA molecules using multiple singly labeled probes. Nat. Methods 5:877–79 [Google Scholar]
  33. Skinner SO, Sepúlveda LA, Xu H, Golding I. 33.  2013. Measuring mRNA copy number in individual Escherichia coli cells using single-molecule fluorescent in situ hybridization. Nat. Protoc. 8:1100–13 [Google Scholar]
  34. So L, Ghosh A, Zong C, Sepúlveda LA, Segev R, Golding I. 34.  2011. General properties of transcriptional time series in Escherichia coli. Nat. Genet. 43:554–60 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hensel Z, Feng H, Han B, Hatem C, Wang J, Xiao J. 35.  2012. Stochastic expression dynamics of a transcription factor revealed by single-molecule noise analysis. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19:797–802 [Google Scholar]
  36. Alvarez LJ, Thomen P, Makushok T, Chatenay D. 36.  2007. Propagation of fluorescent viruses in growing plaques. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 96:615–21 [Google Scholar]
  37. Zeng L, Golding I. 37.  2011. Following cell-fate in E. coli after infection by phage lambda. J. Vis. Exp. 56:e3363 [Google Scholar]
  38. Shao Q, Hawkins A, Zeng L. 38.  2015. Phage DNA dynamics in cells with different fates. Biophys. J. 108:2048–60 [Google Scholar]
  39. Lau IF, Filipe SR, Søballe B, Økstad O, Barre F, Sherratt DJ. 39.  2003. Spatial and temporal organization of replicating Escherichia coli chromosomes. Mol. Microbiol. 49:731–43 [Google Scholar]
  40. Hensel Z, Weng X, Lagda A, Xiao J. 40.  2013. Transcription-factor-mediated DNA looping probed by high-resolution, single-molecule imaging in live E. coli cells. PLOS Biol. 11:e1001591 [Google Scholar]
  41. Li Y, Sergueev K, Austin S. 41.  2002. The segregation of the Escherichia coli origin and terminus of replication. Mol. Microbiol. 46:985–96 [Google Scholar]
  42. Schwartz M. 42.  1975. Reversible interaction between coliphage lambda and its receptor protein. J. Mol. Biol. 99:185–201 [Google Scholar]
  43. Chatterjee S, Rothenberg E. 43.  2012. Interaction of bacteriophage l with its E. coli receptor, LamB. Viruses 4:3162–78 [Google Scholar]
  44. Berg HC, Purcell EM. 44.  1977. Physics of chemoreception. Biophys. J. 20:193 [Google Scholar]
  45. Storms ZJ, Sauvageau D. 45.  2015. Modeling tailed bacteriophage adsorption: insight into mechanisms. Virology 485:355–62 [Google Scholar]
  46. Moldovan R, Chapman-McQuiston E, Wu XL. 46.  2007. On kinetics of phage adsorption. Biophys. J. 93:303–15 [Google Scholar]
  47. Gibbs KA, Isaac DD, Xu J, Hendrix RW, Silhavy TJ, Theriot JA. 47.  2004. Complex spatial distribution and dynamics of an abundant Escherichia coli outer membrane protein, LamB. Mol. Microbiol. 53:1771–83 [Google Scholar]
  48. Vats P, Shih Y, Rothfield L. 48.  2009. Assembly of the MreB associated cytoskeletal ring of Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 72:170–82 [Google Scholar]
  49. Weitz JS, Hartman H, Levin SA. 49.  2005. Coevolutionary arms races between bacteria and bacteriophage. PNAS 102:9535–40 [Google Scholar]
  50. Mackay DJ, Bode VC. 50.  1976. Events in λ injection between phage adsorption and DNA entry. Virology 72:154–66 [Google Scholar]
  51. Grayson P, Han L, Winther T, Phillips R. 51.  2007. Real-time observations of single bacteriophage λ DNA ejections in vitro. PNAS 104:14652–57 [Google Scholar]
  52. Arkin A, Ross J, McAdams HH. 52.  1998. Stochastic kinetic analysis of developmental pathway bifurcation in phage λ-infected Escherichia coli cells. Genetics 149:1633–48 [Google Scholar]
  53. Joh RI, Weitz JS. 53.  2011. To lyse or not to lyse: transient-mediated stochastic fate determination in cells infected by bacteriophages. PLOS Comput. Biol. 7:e1002006 [Google Scholar]
  54. McAdams HH, Shapiro L. 54.  1995. Circuit simulation of genetic networks. Science 269:650–56 [Google Scholar]
  55. Robb ML, Shahrezaei V. 55.  2014. Stochastic cellular fate decision making by multiple infecting lambda phage. PLOS ONE 9:e103636 [Google Scholar]
  56. Weitz JS, Mileyko Y, Joh RI, Voit EO. 56.  2008. Collective decision making in bacterial viruses. Biophys. J. 95:2673–80 [Google Scholar]
  57. Kourilsky P. 57.  1973. Lysogenization by bacteriophage lambda. I. Multiple infection and the lysogenic response. Mol. Gen. Genet. 122:183–95 [Google Scholar]
  58. Oppenheim AB, Kobiler O, Stavans J, Court DL, Adhya S. 58.  2005. Switches in bacteriophage lambda development. Annu. Rev. Genet. 39:409–29 [Google Scholar]
  59. Singh A, Weinberger LS. 59.  2009. Stochastic gene expression as a molecular switch for viral latency. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 12:460–66 [Google Scholar]
  60. Eldar A, Elowitz MB. 60.  2010. Functional roles for noise in genetic circuits. Nature 467:167–73 [Google Scholar]
  61. Svenningsen SL, Semsey S. 61.  2014. Commitment to lysogeny is preceded by a prolonged period of sensitivity to the late lytic regulator Q in bacteriophage λ. J. Bacteriol. 196:3582–88 [Google Scholar]
  62. Echols H, Court D, Green L. 62.  1976. On the nature of cis-acting regulatory proteins and genetic organization in bacteriophage: the example of gene Q of bacteriophage λ. Genetics 83:5–10 [Google Scholar]
  63. Kobiler O, Brodersen P, Taylor MP, Ludmir EB, Enquist LW. 63.  2011. Herpesvirus replication compartments originate with single incoming viral genomes. mBio 2:e00278–11 [Google Scholar]
  64. Elf J, Li G, Xie XS. 64.  2007. Probing transcription factor dynamics at the single-molecule level in a living cell. Science 316:1191–94 [Google Scholar]
  65. Hammar P, Leroy P, Mahmutovic A, Marklund EG, Berg OG, Elf J. 65.  2012. The lac repressor displays facilitated diffusion in living cells. Science 336:1595–98 [Google Scholar]
  66. Sergueev K, Court D, Reaves L, Austin S. 66.  2002. E. coli cell-cycle regulation by bacteriophage lambda. J. Mol. Biol. 324:297–307 [Google Scholar]
  67. Worsey MJ, Wilkins BM. 67.  1975. Induction of prophage λ during the division cycle of Escherichia coli. Mol. Gen. Genet. 139:245–54 [Google Scholar]
  68. Better M, Freifelder D. 68.  1983. Studies on the replication of Escherichia coli phage lambda DNA. I. The kinetics of DNA replication and requirements for the generation of rolling circles. Virology 126:168–82 [Google Scholar]
  69. Arber W. 69.  1960. Polylysogeny for bacteriophage λ. Virology 11:250–72 [Google Scholar]
  70. Freifelder D, Kirschner I. 70.  1971. The formation of homoimmune double lysogens of phage lambda and the segregation of single lysogens from them. Virology 44:633–37 [Google Scholar]
  71. Muñoz-Espín D, Daniel R, Kawai Y, Carballido-López R, Castilla-Llorente V. 71.  et al. 2009. The actin-like MreB cytoskeleton organizes viral DNA replication in bacteria. PNAS 106:13347–52 [Google Scholar]
  72. Ptashne M. 72.  2007. On the use of the word ‘epigenetic.’. Curr. Biol. 17:6 [Google Scholar]
  73. Dodd IB, Perkins AJ, Tsemitsidis D, Egan JB. 73.  2001. Octamerization of λ CI repressor is needed for effective repression of PRM and efficient switching from lysogeny. Genes Dev. 15:3013–22 [Google Scholar]
  74. Dodd IB, Shearwin KE, Perkins AJ, Burr T, Hochschild A, Egan JB. 74.  2004. Cooperativity in long-range gene regulation by the λ CI repressor. Genes Dev. 18:344–54 [Google Scholar]
  75. Crews ST, Pearson JC. 75.  2009. Transcriptional autoregulation in development. Curr. Biol. 19:R241–46 [Google Scholar]
  76. Gurdon JB, Melton DA. 76.  2008. Nuclear reprogramming in cells. Science 322:1811–15 [Google Scholar]
  77. Aurell E, Sneppen K. 77.  2002. Epigenetics as a first exit problem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88:048101 [Google Scholar]
  78. Dubnau D, Losick R. 78.  2006. Bistability in bacteria. Mol. Microbiol. 61:564–72 [Google Scholar]
  79. Reinitz J, Vaisnys RJ. 79.  1990. Theoretical and experimental analysis of the phage lambda genetic switch implies missing levels of co-operativity. J. Theor. Biol. 145:295–318 [Google Scholar]
  80. Ma R, Wang J, Hou Z, Liu H. 80.  2012. Small-number effects: a third stable state in a genetic bistable toggle switch. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109:248107 [Google Scholar]
  81. Little JW, Mount DW. 81.  1982. The SOS regulatory system of Escherichia coli. Cell 29:11–22 [Google Scholar]
  82. Rajendram M, Zhang L, Reynolds BJ, Auer GK, Tuson HH. 82.  et al. 2015. Anionic phospholipids stabilize RecA filament bundles in Escherichia coli. Mol. Cell 60:374–84 [Google Scholar]
  83. Joshi MC, Bourniquel A, Fisher J, Ho BT, Magnan D. 83.  et al. 2011. Escherichia coli sister chromosome separation includes an abrupt global transition with concomitant release of late-splitting intersister snaps. PNAS 108:2765–70 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-virology-110615-042127
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-virology-110615-042127
Loading

Data & Media loading...

    Cell lysis following λ infection, as seen under phase-contrast illumination (see also ). The cell is infected at = 0 and lyses at ≈ 80 min. Video courtesy of Louis McLane and Samuel Skinner; Golding lab (unpublished).

    Tracking the postinfection decision (see also ). Phage capsids were labeled using gpD-YFP. At = 0, two cells are each infected by a single phage (), and one cell is infected by three phages. The two cells infected by single phages go into the lytic pathway, as indicated by the intracellular production of new phage capsids (). The cell infected by three phages goes into the lysogenic pathway, as indicated by the activity of a P-mCherry reporter (). Eventually, the lytic pathway results in cell lysis, whereas the lysogenic cell continues to grow and divide. Video reproduced from Reference 12, copyright 2010, with permission from Elsevier.

    P activity during lysogen induction (see also ). In the reporter strain, mRNA from the P promoter is labeled using MS2-GFP (), whereas the genome locus where the reporter resides is labeled using TetR-mCherry (). The cells are λ lysogens. At = 20 min, mitomycin C is added, leading to transient derepression of P and induction of the dormant prophage. The prophage used is lysis deficient; hence, the cells do not lyse at the end of the induction process. Video courtesy of Jing Zhang, Louis McLane, and Samuel Skinner; Golding lab (unpublished).

    Single-molecule imaging of CI production () during stable lysogeny. For more information see Reference 35. Video reproduced from Reference 35, copyright 2012, with permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

    A single gpD-YFP-labeled λ phage () diffusing near and on the cell (). Two examples are shown sequentially. For more information see Reference 9. Video courtesy of Eli Rothenberg, Samuel Skinner, and Ido Golding (unpublished).

    DNA injection into the cell. The λ genome, initially inside the capsid, was labeled using a SYTOX Orange DNA dye. For more information see Reference 10. Video reproduced from Reference 10, copyright 2012, with permission from Elsevier.

    Spatiotemporal dynamics of phage () and bacterial () genome loci inside the infected cell during the lysogenic pathway (see ). The phage genome is labeled using mCherry-ParB. In the same cell, the bacterial site is detected using an orthogonal ParB system and GFP. For more information see Reference 11. Video courtesy of Louis McLane and Samuel Skinner; Golding lab (unpublished).

    Spatiotemporal dynamics of the phage genome inside the cell during the lytic pathway. At = 0 min, the cell is infected by a gpD-YFP-labeled phage (). At = 5 min, a SeqA-ECFP focus corresponding to the injected phage DNA appears. Later, this focus is converted to two foci, corresponding to two hemimethylated phage DNAs. The cell eventually lyses (not shown). Video reproduced from Reference 38, copyright 2015, with permission from Elsevier.

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error