1932

Abstract

This essay is a highly personalized account of some of the important conceptual contributions to immunology. I have asked myself, “What were the ideas that caught my attention and how and by whom were they presented?” I have learned that most of what immunologists have called concepts deal with too small a slice of the subject. They are essentially inductive extrapolations from one experiment to a possible next step. Historically, these extrapolations extended over too narrow a chasm to account for the information available at the time. The result was that an extrapolation from one misleading observation could dominate and distort, for a significant time, the course of the field. It is also why there has been an inverse relationship between the clarity of a theory and its ease of acceptance by immunologists. Looking to the past, I have used two areas to illustrate the role of conceptualization: the self-nonself discrimination and the origin of the humoral repertoire. To illustrate all of this I have chosen as a cast & characters the founding fathers of immunologays we know it today. I hope that by taking this look into the rear view mirror our efforts will be guided in more productive ways. The take-home lesson is that we need to widen our horizon constantly to make more general concepts that then render the manipulation of the immune system more useful.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.iy.12.040194.000245
1994-04-01
2024-04-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.iy.12.040194.000245
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error