1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Political Science
  4. Volume 13, 2010
  5. Article

Annual Review of Political Science

Volume 13, 2010

Political Theory of Empire and Imperialism

Abstract

The past decade has seen a spate of new work on empire in political theory and the history of political thought. Much of this work has focused on the place of empire in the thought of many canonical thinkers and in the formation of modern liberalism and related arenas, such as postcolonial settler societies and the discipline of international law. Political theory's turn to empire has been belated in comparison to other fields, such as history, literature, and anthropology, which had been grappling with the histories and legacies of modern European empires since the 1970s. Despite intense attention to the question of American imperialism during the Bush administration, political theory arguably continues to fail to deal adequately with the imperial features of the current global order, including the substantial responsibility on the part of the great powers for conditions such as extreme poverty, ecological crisis, civil conflict, and tyranny around the world.

Keyword(s): cosmopolitanism, global justice, globalization, liberalism, postcolonial studies
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.polisci.051508.214538
2010-06-15
2025-03-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/13/1/annurev.polisci.051508.214538.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.polisci.051508.214538&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adelman J. 2006. Sovereignty and Revolution in the Iberian Atlantic Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. x, 409 [Google Scholar]
  2. Agnani SM. 2004. Enlightenment universalism and colonial knowledge: Denis Diderot and Edmund Burke, 1770–1800 PhD thesis Columbia Univ. [Google Scholar]
  3. Alfred T. 1999. Peace, Power, Righteousness: An Indigenous Manifesto Don Mills, Ont.: Oxford Univ. Press xxvi174 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ando C. 2000. Imperial Ideology and Provincial Loyalty in the Roman Empire Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press xxi494 [Google Scholar]
  5. Ando C. 2008. Aliens, ambassadors, and the integrity of the empire. Law Hist. Rev. 26:491–519 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ando C. “A dwelling beyond violence”: on the uses and disadvantages of history for contemporary republicans. Unpublished manuscript Dep. Classics, Univ. Chicago [Google Scholar]
  7. Anghie A. 2004. Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press356 [Google Scholar]
  8. Anghie A, Chimni B, Mickelson K, Okafor O. 2003. The Third World and International Order: Law, Politics, and Globalization Leiden: Brill Acad viii192 [Google Scholar]
  9. Archibugi D. 2008. The Global Commonwealth of Citizens: Toward Cosmopolitan Democracy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press xix298 [Google Scholar]
  10. Armitage D. 2004a. The fifty years' rift: intellectual history and international relations. Mod. Intellect. Hist. 1:97–109 [Google Scholar]
  11. Armitage D. 2004b. John Locke, Carolina, and the two treatises of government. Polit. Theory 32:602–27 [Google Scholar]
  12. Armitage D. 2000. The Ideological Origins of the British Empire Cambridge/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press xi239 [Google Scholar]
  13. Arneil B. 1996. John Locke and America: the Defense of English Colonialism Oxford, UK: Clarendon230 [Google Scholar]
  14. Asad T. 1975. Anthropology & the Colonial Encounter London/Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Ithaca Press; Humanities Press281 [Google Scholar]
  15. Banner S. 2005. How the Indians Lost their Land: Law and Power on the Frontier Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press344 [Google Scholar]
  16. Bayly CA. 1989. Imperial Meridian: the British Empire and the World, 1780–1830 London/New York: Longman xv295 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bayly CA. 2004. The Birth of the Modern World, 1780–1914: Global Connections and Comparisons Malden, MA: Blackwell xxiv540 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bayly CA. 2007. Rammohun Roy and the advent of constitutional liberalism in India, 1800–30. Mod. Intellect. Hist. 4.1:25–41 [Google Scholar]
  19. Beaulac S. 2004. The Power of Language in the Making of International Law: the Word Sovereignty in Bodin and Vattel and the Myth of Westphalia Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff xiii200 [Google Scholar]
  20. Bell D. 2007a. The Idea of Greater Britain: Empire and the Future of World Order, 1860–1900 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press x321 [Google Scholar]
  21. Bell D. 2007b. Victorian Visions of Global Order: Empire and International Relations in Nineteenth-Century Political Thought Cambridge/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press ix297 [Google Scholar]
  22. Bell DSA. 2010. John Stuart Mill on colonies. Polit. Theory. In press [Google Scholar]
  23. Benton L. 2001. Law and Colonial Cultures: Legal Regimes in World History, 1400–1900 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  24. Benton L. 2010. A Search for Sovereignty: Law and Geography in European Empires, 1400–1900 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  25. Benton L, Straumann B. 2010. Acquiring empire by law: from Roman doctrine to early modern European practice. Law Hist. Rev. In press [Google Scholar]
  26. Berlin I. 1965. The thought of de Tocqueville (review of The Social and Political Thought of Alexis de Tocqueville, by J. Lively). History 50:199–206 [Google Scholar]
  27. Bilder MS. 2004. The Transatlantic Constitution: Colonial Legal Culture and the Empire Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press xiii291 [Google Scholar]
  28. Blackhawk. 2006. Violence over the Land: Indians and Empires in the Early American West Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press372 [Google Scholar]
  29. Blanchard P, Bancel N, Lemaire S. 2005. La fracture coloniale: la société française au prisme de l'héritage colonial Paris: La Découverte310 [Google Scholar]
  30. Borschberg P. 2002. The seizure of the Sta. Catarina revisited: the Portuguese Empire in Asia, VOC politics and the origins of the Dutch-Johor alliance (1602–c.1616). J. Southeast Asian Stud. 33:31–62 [Google Scholar]
  31. Bourke R. 2007. Edmund Burke and the politics of conquest. Mod. Intellect. Hist. 4:403–32 [Google Scholar]
  32. Brown W. 2005. Edgework: Critical Essays on Knowledge and Politics Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press x159 [Google Scholar]
  33. Burbank J, Cooper F. 2010. Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  34. Burbank J, Von Hagen M, Remnev AV. 2007. Russian Empire: Space, People, Power, 1700–1930 Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press xii538 [Google Scholar]
  35. Burke E, Bromwich D. 2000. On Empire, Liberty, and Reform: Speeches and Letters New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press viii526 [Google Scholar]
  36. Burton A. 2006. New narratives of imperial politics in the nineteenth century. See Hall & Rose 2006 212–29
  37. Burton AM. 2003. After the Imperial Turn: Thinking with and Through the Nation Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press369 [Google Scholar]
  38. Bush GW. 2004. Address before a Joint Session of the Congress on the State of the Union The American Presidency Project http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=29646 [Google Scholar]
  39. Calhoun CJ, Cooper F, Moore KW. Social Science Research Council (U.S.) 2006. Lessons of Empire: Imperial Histories and American Power New York: New Press distributed by W.W. Norton vi342 [Google Scholar]
  40. Cavallar G. 2002. The Rights of Strangers: Theories of International Hospitality, the Global Community, and Political Justice Since Vitoria Aldershot, UK/Burlington, VT: Ashgate vii421 [Google Scholar]
  41. Chakrabarty D. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press xii301 [Google Scholar]
  42. Chatterjee P. 1986. Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World: A Derivative Discourse? London/Totowa, NJ: Zed Books for the U.N. Univ. viii181 [Google Scholar]
  43. Claeys G. 2007. The ‘left’ and the critique of empire c. 1865–1900: three roots of humanitarian foreign policy. Victorian Visions of Global Order D Bell 239–66 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  44. Claeys G. 2010. Imperial Sceptics: British Critics of Empire 1850–1920 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  45. Clancy-Smith JA. 1994. Rebel and Saint: Muslim Notables, Populist Protest, Colonial Encounters (Algeria and Tunisia, 1800–1904) Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press xxiii370 [Google Scholar]
  46. Cohen J. 2004. Whose sovereignty? Empire versus international law. Ethics Int. Aff. 18:1–24 [Google Scholar]
  47. Cohn BS. 1987. An Anthropologist among the Historians and other Essays Delhi/New York: Oxford Univ. Press xxvi682 [Google Scholar]
  48. Colley L. 1992. Britons: Forging the Nation, 1707–1837 New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press x429 [Google Scholar]
  49. Colley L. 2002. Captives: Britain, Empire and the World, 1600–1850 London: Jonathan Cape xvii438 [Google Scholar]
  50. Comaroff J, Comaroff JL. 1991. Of Revelation and Revolution Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  51. Comaroff JL, Comaroff J. 2009. Ethnicity, Inc Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press234 [Google Scholar]
  52. Conklin AL. 1997. A Mission to Civilize: The Republican Idea of Empire in France and West Africa, 1895–1930 Stanford,CA: Stanford Univ. Press x367 [Google Scholar]
  53. Connelly M. 2006. The new imperialists. See Calhoun et al. 2006 19–33
  54. Cooper F. 2005a. Colonialism in Question: Theory, Knowledge, History Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press xii327 [Google Scholar]
  55. Cooper F. 2005b. Postcolonial studies and the study of history. Postcolonial Studies and Beyond A Loomba 401–22 Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  56. Cooper F. 2006. Modernizing colonialism and the limits of empire. Lessons of Empire: Imperial Histories and American Power C Calhoun, F Cooper, KW Moore 63–72 New York: New Press [Google Scholar]
  57. Curtin PD. 1984. Cross-Cultural Trade in World History Cambridge/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press xi293 [Google Scholar]
  58. Curtin PD. 2000. The World and the West: the European Challenge and the Overseas Response in the Age of Empire Cambridge/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press xiv294 [Google Scholar]
  59. Dallmayr FR. 1999. Border Crossings: Toward a Comparative Political Theory Lanham, MD: Lexington Books viii313 [Google Scholar]
  60. Dallmayr FR. 2002. Dialogue among Civilizations: Some Exemplary Voices New York: Palgrave Macmillan xi282 [Google Scholar]
  61. Darby P. 2007. Doing the postcolonial differently. See Persram 2007 249–70
  62. Davis M. 2001. Late Victorian Holocausts: El Niño Famines and the Making of the Third World London/New York: Verso x464 [Google Scholar]
  63. Dietz M. 2007. Between polis and empire: Aristotle's Politics Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Polit. Sci. Assoc., Chicago [Google Scholar]
  64. Dirks NB. 2001. Postcolonialism and its discontents: history, anthropology, and postcolonial critique. Schools of Thought: Twenty-Five Years of Interpretive Social Science JW Scott, D Keates 227–51 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  65. Dirks NB. 2006. The Scandal of Empire: India and the Creation of Imperial Britain Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press xviii389 [Google Scholar]
  66. Doyle MW. 1986. Empires Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press407 [Google Scholar]
  67. Duara P. 2009. The Global and Regional in China's Nation-Formation New York: Routledge x253 [Google Scholar]
  68. Dubois L. 2004. A Colony of Citizens: Revolution & Slave Emancipation in the French Caribbean, 1787–1804 Williamsburg, VA: Omohundro Inst. Early Am. Hist. Cult. and Univ. North Carolina Press x452 [Google Scholar]
  69. Dussel ED. 1995. The Invention of the Americas: Eclipse of “the Other” and the Myth of Modernity transl. MD Barber New York: Continuum224 [Google Scholar]
  70. Eley G. 2007. Historicizing the global, politicizing capital: giving the present a name. Hist. Workshop J. 63:154–88 [Google Scholar]
  71. Elkins C. 2005. Imperial Reckoning: The Untold Story of Britain's Gulag in Kenya New York: Henry Holt xvi475 [Google Scholar]
  72. Elkins C, Pedersen S. 2005. Settler Colonialism in the Twentieth Century: Projects, Practices, Legacies New York: Routledge xiii303 [Google Scholar]
  73. Euben RL. 2006. Journeys to the other shore: Muslim and Western travelers in search of knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press xii313 [Google Scholar]
  74. Fabian J. 1983. Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes its Object New York: Columbia Univ. Press xv205 [Google Scholar]
  75. Falk R, Stevens J, Rajagopal B. 2008. International Law and the Third World: Reshaping Justice London/New York: Routledge-Cavendish x275 [Google Scholar]
  76. Farr J. 2008. Locke, natural law, and new world slavery. Polit. Theory 36:495–522 [Google Scholar]
  77. Ferguson N. 2003. Empire: the Rise and Demise of the British World Order and the Lessons for Global Power New York: Basic Books xxix392 [Google Scholar]
  78. Ferguson N. 2004. Colossus: the Price of America's Empire New York: Penguin384 [Google Scholar]
  79. Festa LM. 2006. Sentimental Figures of Empire in Eighteenth-Century Britain and France Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press viii300 [Google Scholar]
  80. Fitzmaurice A. 2003. Humanism and America: An Intellectual History of English Colonization, 1500–1625 Cambridge/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press x216 [Google Scholar]
  81. Fitzmaurice A. 2007. The genealogy of terra nullius. Aust. Hist. Stud. 129:1–15 [Google Scholar]
  82. Fitzpatrick MP. 2008. Liberal Imperialism in Germany: Expansionism and Nationalism, 1848–1884 New York: Berghahn Books237 [Google Scholar]
  83. Forsdick C, Murphy D. 2003. Francophone Postcolonial Studies: A Critical Introduction New York: Oxford Univ. Press xii305 [Google Scholar]
  84. Geertz C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays New York: Basic Books ix470 [Google Scholar]
  85. Go J. 2008. American Empire and the Politics of Meaning: Elite Political Cultures in the Philippines and Puerto Rico during U.S. Colonialism Durham, NC: Duke University Press xi377 [Google Scholar]
  86. Griffin P. 2007. American Leviathan: Empire, Nation, and Revolutionary Frontier New York: Hill & Wang386 [Google Scholar]
  87. Grovogui SNZ. 1996. Sovereigns, Quasi Sovereigns, and Africans: Race and Self-Determination in International Law Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press xii282 [Google Scholar]
  88. Hall C. 2000. Cultures of Empire: Colonizers in Britain and the Empire in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries: A Reader New York: Routledge x390 [Google Scholar]
  89. Hall C. 2002. Civilising Subjects: Colony and Metropole in the English Imagination, 1830–1867 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press xviii556 [Google Scholar]
  90. Hall C, Rose SO. 2006. At Home with the Empire: Metropolitan Culture and the Imperial World Cambridge/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press ix338 [Google Scholar]
  91. Hardt M, Negri A. 2000. Empire Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press xvii478 [Google Scholar]
  92. Harvey D. 2003. The New Imperialism Oxford/New York: Oxford Univ. Press ix253 [Google Scholar]
  93. Harvey D. 2009. Cosmopolitanism and the Geographies of Freedom New York: Columbia Univ. Press x339 [Google Scholar]
  94. Hendrickson DC. 2009. Union, Nation, or Empire: The American Debate over International Relations Lawrence: Univ. Press Kansas xvi478 [Google Scholar]
  95. Hevia J. 2003. English Lessons: The Pedagogy of Imperialism in Nineteenth-Century China Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press xviii387 [Google Scholar]
  96. Hobsbawm EJ. 2008. On Empire: America, War, and Global Supremacy New York: Pantheon Books xx97 [Google Scholar]
  97. Hochschild A. 1998. King Leopold's Ghost: A Story of Greed, Terror, and Heroism in Colonial Africa Boston: Houghton Mifflin366 [Google Scholar]
  98. Hulsebosch DJ. 2005. Constituting Empire: New York and the Transformation of Constitutionalism in the Atlantic World, 1664–1830 Chapel Hill: Univ. North Carolina Press494 [Google Scholar]
  99. Hörnqvist M. 2004. Machiavelli and Empire Cambridge/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press xi302 [Google Scholar]
  100. Ignatieff M. 2003. Empire Lite: Nation Building in Bosnia, Kosovo, Afghanistan London: Vintage viii134 [Google Scholar]
  101. Ivison D. 2002. Postcolonial Liberalism Cambridge/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press x214 [Google Scholar]
  102. Ivison D, Patton P, Sanders W. 2000. Political Theory and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Cambridge/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press xi323 [Google Scholar]
  103. Jackson RH. 1990. Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Third World Cambridge/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press x225 [Google Scholar]
  104. James H. 2006. The Roman Predicament: How the Rules of International Order Create the Politics of Empire Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press vii166 [Google Scholar]
  105. Johnson CA. 2004. The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic New York: Metropolitan Books389 [Google Scholar]
  106. Keal P. 2003. European Conquest and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: The Moral Backwardness of International Society Cambridge/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press ix258 [Google Scholar]
  107. Keene E. 2002. Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics Cambridge/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press xiv165 [Google Scholar]
  108. Khalidi R. 2004. Resurrecting Empire: Western Footprints and America's Perilous Path in the Middle East Boston: Beacon xiv223 [Google Scholar]
  109. Khalidi R. 2009. Sowing Crisis: The Cold War and American Dominance in the Middle East Boston: Beacon xvi308 [Google Scholar]
  110. Kinzer S. 2003. All the Shah's Men: An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons xiv258 [Google Scholar]
  111. Kohn M. 2008. 2006 Colonialism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Fall 2008, ed. EN Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/colonialism/ [Google Scholar]
  112. Kohn M. 2009. Afghānī on empire, Islam, and civilization. Polit. Theory 37:398–422 [Google Scholar]
  113. Kohn M, O'Neill D. 2006. A tale of two Indias: Burke and Mill and empire and slavery in the West Indies and Americas. Polit. Theory 34:192–228 [Google Scholar]
  114. Koskenniemi M. 2001. Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  115. Koskenniemi M. 2002. International law and imperialism. Contemporary Issues in International Law D Freeston, S Subedi, S Davidson 197–218 Kluwer Law Int. [Google Scholar]
  116. Kramer P. 2006.. The Blood of Government: Race, Empire, the United States, and the Philippines. Chapel Hill: Univ. North Carolina Press xii538
  117. Lal D. 2004. In Praise of Empires: Globalization and Order New York: Palgrave Macmillan xxvi270 [Google Scholar]
  118. Lebovics H. 2004. Bringing the Empire Back Home: France in the Global Age Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press xvi232 [Google Scholar]
  119. Lieven DCB. 2000. Empire: the Russian Empire and its Rivals London: John Murray xlii486 [Google Scholar]
  120. Liu LH. 2004. The Clash of Empires: the Invention of China in Modern World Making Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press xiii318 [Google Scholar]
  121. Loomba A. et al. 2005. Postcolonial Studies and Beyond Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press x499 [Google Scholar]
  122. Lupher DA. 2003. Romans in a New World: Classical Models in Sixteenth-Century Spanish America Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press vi440 [Google Scholar]
  123. MacCormack S. 2007. On the Wings of Time: Rome, the Incas, Spain, and Peru Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press xix320 [Google Scholar]
  124. MacMillan K. 2006. Sovereignty and Possession in the English New World: the Legal Foundations of Empire, 1576–1640 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press xiii235 [Google Scholar]
  125. Maier CS. 2006. Among Empires: American Ascendancy and its Predecessors Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press373 [Google Scholar]
  126. Malcolm N. 2002. Hobbes, Sandys, and the Virginia Company. Aspects of Hobbes53–79 Oxford, UK: Clarendon [Google Scholar]
  127. Mamdani M. 2004. Good Muslim, Bad Muslim: America, the Cold War, and the Roots of Terror New York: Pantheon Books xii304 [Google Scholar]
  128. Mann M. 2003. Incoherent Empire London/New York: Verso viii278 [Google Scholar]
  129. Manning S, Cogliano FD. 2006. The Atlantic Enlightenment Aldershot, UK: Ashgate xii209 [Google Scholar]
  130. Mantena K. 2007. Mill and the imperial predicament. J.S. Mill's Political Thought N Urbinati, A Zakaras 298–318 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  131. Mantena K. 2010. Alibis of Empire: Henry Maine and the Ends of Liberal Imperialism Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  132. Markell P. The insufficiency of nondomination Unpublished manuscript Dep. Polit. Sci., Univ. Chicago [Google Scholar]
  133. Marks S. 2003. Empire's law. Indiana J. Global Legal Stud. 10:449–66 [Google Scholar]
  134. Mazower M. 2008. Hitler's Empire: How the Nazis Ruled Europe New York: Penguin xl725 [Google Scholar]
  135. Mehta U. 1999. Liberalism and Empire: A Study in Nineteenth-Century British Liberal Thought Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  136. Mitchell T. 1991. Colonising Egypt Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press xviii218 [Google Scholar]
  137. Miéville C. 2005. Between Equal Rights: A Marxist Theory of International Law Leiden/Boston: Brill xi375 [Google Scholar]
  138. Mill JS. 1981. 1873 Autobiography J Robson, J Stillinger 1 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill Toronto: Univ. Toronto Press [Google Scholar]
  139. Moir MI, Peers DM, Zastoupil L. 1999. J. S. Mill's Encounter with India Toronto: Univ. Toronto Press [Google Scholar]
  140. Moraña M, Dussel ED, Jáuregui CA. 2008. Coloniality at Large: Latin America and the Postcolonial Debate Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press viii628 [Google Scholar]
  141. Morefield J. 2005. Covenants without Swords: Idealist Liberalism and the Spirit of Empire Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press xii253 [Google Scholar]
  142. Morefield J. 2008. Empire, tragedy, and the liberal state in the writings of Niall Ferguson and Michael Ignatieff. Theory and Event11 [Google Scholar]
  143. Muldoon J. 1999. Empire and Order: the Concept of Empire, 800–1800 New York: St. Martin's viii209 [Google Scholar]
  144. Muthu S. 2003. Enlightenment Against Empire Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  145. Muthu S. 2008. Adam Smith's critique of international trading companies: theorizing “globalization” in the Age of Enlightenment. Polit. Theory 36:185–212 [Google Scholar]
  146. Nussbaum F. 2003. The Global Eighteenth Century Baltimore, MD. Johns Hopkins Univ. Press xiv385 [Google Scholar]
  147. Orford A. 2003. Reading Humanitarian Intervention: Human Rights and the Use of Force in International Law Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press ix243 [Google Scholar]
  148. Pagden A. 1982. The Fall of Natural Man: The American Indian and the Origins of Comparative Ethnology Cambridge/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press xii268 [Google Scholar]
  149. Pagden A. 1990. Spanish Imperialism and the Political Imagination: Studies in European and Spanish-American Social and Political Theory, 1513–1830 New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press viii184 [Google Scholar]
  150. Pagden A. 1993. European Encounters with the New World: from Renaissance to Romanticism New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press vi216 [Google Scholar]
  151. Pagden A. 1995. Lords of All the World: Ideologies of Empire in Spain, Britain and France c. 1500–c. 1850 New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press ix244 [Google Scholar]
  152. Pagden A. 2001. Peoples and Empires: A Short History of European Migration, Exploration, and Conquest from Greece to the Present New York: Modern Library xxv206 [Google Scholar]
  153. Pagden A. 2008. Worlds at War: the 2500-Year Struggle between East and West New York: Random House xxv625 [Google Scholar]
  154. Palmerston HJT, Viscount. 1850. Speech of 25 June 1850. Hansard CXII [3rd Ser.]380–444 [Google Scholar]
  155. Parekh B. 1994. Superior people: the narrowness of liberalism from Mill to Rawls. Times Lit. Suppl. 25 Feb. 11–13 [Google Scholar]
  156. Parekh B. 1995. Liberalism and colonialism: a critique of Locke and Mill. The Decolonization of Imagination: Culture, Knowledge and Power JN Peterse, B Parekh 81–98 London: Zed Books [Google Scholar]
  157. Parel A, Keith RC. 1992. Comparative Political Philosophy: Studies Under the Upas Tree New Delhi/Newbury Park, CA: Sage260 [Google Scholar]
  158. Pearson N. 2009. Up from the Mission: Selected Writings Melbourne: Black Inc.400 [Google Scholar]
  159. Persram N. 2007. Postcolonialism and Political Theory Lanham, MD: Lexington Books xlii322 [Google Scholar]
  160. Pitts J. 2005. A Turn to Empire: The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press xii382 [Google Scholar]
  161. Pitts J. 2008. Constant's thought on empire and slavery. The Cambridge Companion to Constant H Rosenblatt 115–45 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  162. Pitts J. 2009. Liberalism and empire in a nineteenth-century Algerian mirror. Mod. Intellect. Hist. 6:287–313 [Google Scholar]
  163. Pocock JGA. 1999–2005. Barbarism and Religion Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  164. Pocock JGA. 2005. The Discovery of Islands: Essays in British History Cambridge/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press xiii344 [Google Scholar]
  165. Pogge T. 2002. World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms Cambridge, UK: Polity vii284 [Google Scholar]
  166. Pollack S. 2006. Empire and imitation. See Calhoun et al. 2006 175–88
  167. Porter B. 2006. Empire and Superempire: Britain, America, and the World New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press211 [Google Scholar]
  168. Povinelli E. 2002. The Cunning of Recognition: Indigenous Alterities and the Making of Australian Multiculturalism Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press xi338 [Google Scholar]
  169. Povinelli E. 2005. A flight from freedom. See Loomba et al. 2005 145–65
  170. Rajagopal B. 2003. International Law from Below: Development, Social Movements, and Third World Resistance New York: Cambridge Univ. Press xvi343 [Google Scholar]
  171. Rana A. 2010. Settler Empire: American Freedom and Its Consequences Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press In press [Google Scholar]
  172. Rawls J. 1999. The Law of Peoples; with “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press viii199 [Google Scholar]
  173. Richter M. 1963. Tocqueville on Algeria. Rev. Polit. 25:362–98 [Google Scholar]
  174. Rogin M. 1975. Fathers and Children: Andrew Jackson and the Subjugation of the American Indian New York: Knopf373 [Google Scholar]
  175. Rogin M. 1987. Ronald Reagan, The Movie Berkeley and Los Angeles: Univ. Calif. Press xx366 [Google Scholar]
  176. Rothschild E. 2004. Global commerce and the question of sovereignty in the eighteenth-century provinces. Mod. Intellect. Hist. 1:3–25 [Google Scholar]
  177. Rothschild E. 2008. David Hume and the seagods of the Atlantic. See Manning & Cogliano 2008 81–96
  178. Saada E. 2007. Les enfants de la colonie: les métis de l'empire français entre sujétion et citoyenneté Paris: Découverte334 [Google Scholar]
  179. Said EW. 1993. Culture and Imperialism New York: Knopf, distributed by Random House xxviii380 [Google Scholar]
  180. Said EW. 2003. Orientalism New York: Vintage [Google Scholar]
  181. Sartori A. 2006. The British Empire and its liberal mission. J. Mod. Hist. 78:623–42 [Google Scholar]
  182. Sartori A. 2008. Bengal in Global Concept History Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press ix284 [Google Scholar]
  183. Schmidt-Nowara C, Nieto-Phillips JM. 2005. Interpreting Spanish Colonialism: Empires, Nations, and Legends Albuquerque: Univ. New Mexico Press ix269 [Google Scholar]
  184. Schultz B, Varouxakis G. 2005. Utilitarianism and Empire Lanham, MD: Lexington Books ix263 [Google Scholar]
  185. Scott D. 1999. Refashioning Futures: Criticism after Postcoloniality Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press233 [Google Scholar]
  186. Scott D. 2004. Conscripts of Modernity: the Tragedy of Colonial Enlightenment Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press279 [Google Scholar]
  187. Shapiro MJ. 2006. Deforming American Political Thought: Ethnicity, Facticity, and Genre Lexington: Univ. Press Kentucky xxii245 [Google Scholar]
  188. Shogimen T, Nederman CJ. 2009. Western Political Thought in Dialogue with Asia Lanham, MD: Lexington Books vi330 [Google Scholar]
  189. Slotkin R. 1973. Regeneration Through Violence: The Mythology of the American Frontier, 1600–1860 Middletown, CT: Wesleyan Univ. Press viii670 [Google Scholar]
  190. Slotkin R. 1985. The Fatal Environment: The Myth of the Frontier in the Age of Industrialization, 1800–1890 New York: Atheneum xiii636 [Google Scholar]
  191. Smouts M-C. 2007. La situation postcoloniale: les postcolonial studies dans le débat français Paris: Sciences Po [Google Scholar]
  192. Steinmetz G. 2006. Imperialism or colonialism? From Windhoek to Washington, by way of Basra. See Calhoun et al. 2006 135–56
  193. Steinmetz G. 2007. The Devil's Handwriting: Precoloniality and the German Colonial State in Qingdao, Samoa, and Southwest Africa Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press xxviii640 [Google Scholar]
  194. Stoler AL. 2006. Imperial formations and the opacities of rule. See Calhoun et al. 2006 48–60
  195. Stoler AL, McGranahan C, Perdue PC. 2007. Imperial Formations Santa Fe, NM/Oxford, UK: School Adv. Res. Press; James Currey xii429 [Google Scholar]
  196. Subrahmanyam S. 1996. Merchant Networks in the Early Modern World Aldershot, UK/Brookfield, VT: Variorum xxvi397 [Google Scholar]
  197. Subrahmanyam S. 2005. Explorations in Connected History New Delhi: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  198. Subrahmanyam S. 2006. Imperial and colonial encounters: some comparative reflections. See Calhoun et al. 2006 217–28
  199. Suny RG, Martin T. 2001. A State of Nations: Empire and Nation-Making in the Age of Lenin and Stalin New York: Oxford Univ. Press xii307 [Google Scholar]
  200. Sylvest C. 2009. British Liberal Internationalism, 1880–1930 Manchester, UK: Manchester Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  201. Takaki R. Iron Cages: Race and Culture in Nineteenth-Century America New York: Knopf xviii361 [Google Scholar]
  202. Taylor C. 2004. Modern Social Imaginaries Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  203. Taylor M. 1991. Imperium et libertas? Rethinking the radical critique of imperialism during the nineteenth century. J. Imperial Commonw. Hist. 19:1–23 [Google Scholar]
  204. Teschke B. 2003. The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics, and the Making of Modern International Relations London/New York: Verso308 [Google Scholar]
  205. Tocqueville A. 2001. Writings on Empire and Slavery J Pitts Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press xxxviii277 [Google Scholar]
  206. Tuck R. 1999. The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  207. Tully J. 1993. An Approach to Political Philosophy: Locke in Contexts Cambridge/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press xii333 [Google Scholar]
  208. Tully J. 1995. Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity Cambridge/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press xvi253 [Google Scholar]
  209. Tully J. 2008. Public Philosophy in a New Key Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  210. Tunick M. 2006. Tolerant imperialism: John Stuart Mill's defense of British rule in India. Rev. Polit. 68:586–611 [Google Scholar]
  211. Van Ittersum MJ. 2006. Profit and Principle: Hugo Grotius, Natural Rights Theories and the Rise of Dutch Power in the East Indies, 1595–1615 Leiden/Boston: Brill lxii538 [Google Scholar]
  212. Vergès F. 1999. Monsters and Revolutionaries: Colonial Family Romance and Métissage Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press xx394 [Google Scholar]
  213. Wedeen L. 2008. Peripheral Visions: Publics, Power, and Performance in Yemen Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press xv300 [Google Scholar]
  214. Wedeen L. Scientific knowledge, liberalism, and empire: political science in the Middle East. Unpublished manuscript for U.S. Academia and Middle Eastern Studies in Critical Perspective S Shami, C Miller-Idriss [Google Scholar]
  215. Welch C. 2003. Colonial violence and the rhetoric of evasion: Tocqueville on Algeria. Polit. Theory 31:235–64 [Google Scholar]
  216. Whelan FG. 1996. Edmund Burke and India: Political Morality and Empire Pittsburgh, PA: Univ. Pittsburgh Press xiii368 [Google Scholar]
  217. Whelan FG. 2009. Enlightenment Political Thought and Non-Western Societies: Sultans and Savages New York: Routledge xii227 [Google Scholar]
  218. White R. 1991. The Middle Ground: Indians, Empires, and Republics in the Great Lakes Region, 1650–1815 Cambridge/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press xvi544 [Google Scholar]
  219. Wilson K. 2004. A New Imperial History: Culture, Identity, and Modernity in Britain and the Empire, 1660–1840 Cambridge/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press xv385 [Google Scholar]
  220. Wolf ER. 1982. Europe and the People without History Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press xi503 [Google Scholar]
  221. Young IM. 2007. Global Challenges: War, Self Determination and Responsibility for Justice Cambridge, UK: Polity viii216 [Google Scholar]
  222. Ypi L, Goodin RE, Barry C. 2009. Associative duties, global justice, and the colonies. Philos. Public Affairs 37:103–35 [Google Scholar]
  223. Zastoupil L. 1994. John Stuart Mill and India Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press viii280 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.polisci.051508.214538
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error