1932

Abstract

Personality psychology addresses views of human nature and individual differences. Biological and goal-based views of human nature provide an especially useful basis for construing coping; the five-factor model of traits adds a useful set of individual differences. Coping—responses to adversity and to the distress that results—is categorized in many ways. Meta-analyses link optimism, extraversion, conscientiousness, and openness to more engagement coping; neuroticism to more disengagement coping; and optimism, conscientiousness, and agreeableness to less disengagement coping. Relations of traits to specific coping responses reveal a more nuanced picture. Several moderators of these associations also emerge: age, stressor severity, and temporal proximity between the coping activity and the coping report. Personality and coping play both independent and interactive roles in influencing physical and mental health. Recommendations are presented for ways future research can expand on the growing understanding of how personality and coping shape adjustment to stress.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100352
2010-01-10
2024-06-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/psych/61/1/annurev.psych.093008.100352.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100352&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Ahadi SA, Rothbart MK. 1994. Temperament, development and the Big Five. The Developing Structure of Temperament and Personality from Infancy to Adulthood CF Halverson Jr, GA Kohnstamm, RP Martin 189–207 Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum [Google Scholar]
  2. Aldridge AA, Roesch SC. 2007. Coping and adjustment in children with cancer: a meta-analytic study. J. Behav. Med. 30:115–29 [Google Scholar]
  3. Allport GW. 1961. Pattern and Growth in Personality New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston [Google Scholar]
  4. Andrykowsky MA, Brady MJ, Hunt JW. 1993. Positive psychosocial adjustment in potential bone marrow transplant recipients: cancer as a psychosocial transition. Psychol. Oncol. 2:261–76 [Google Scholar]
  5. Asendorpf JB. 1998. Personality effects on social relationships. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 74:1531–44 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ashton MC, Lee K, Paunonen SV. 2002. What is the central feature of extraversion? Social attention versus reward sensitivity. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 83:245–52 [Google Scholar]
  7. Ashton MC, Lee K, Perugini M, Szarota P, de Vries RE. et al. 2004. A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 86:356–66 [Google Scholar]
  8. Aspinwall LG, Taylor SE. 1997. A stitch in time: self-regulation and proactive coping. Psychol. Bull. 121:417–36 [Google Scholar]
  9. Austenfeld JL, Stanton AL. 2004. Coping through emotional approach: a new look at emotion, coping, and health-related outcomes. J. Personal. 72:1335–63 [Google Scholar]
  10. Austin JT, Vancouver JB. 1996. Goal constructs in psychology: structure, process, and content. Psychol. Bull. 120:338–75 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bandura A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall [Google Scholar]
  12. Blascovich J. 2008. Challenge and threat. Handbook of Approach and Avoidance Motivation AJ Elliot 431–45 New York: Psychology Press [Google Scholar]
  13. Block J. 1995. A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality assessment. Psychol. Bull. 117:187–215 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bolger N. 1990. Coping as a personality process: a prospective study. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 59:525–37 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bolger N, Davis A, Rafaeli E. 2003. Diary methods: capturing life as it is lived. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 54:579–616 [Google Scholar]
  16. Bolger N, Zuckerman A. 1995. A framework for studying personality in the stress process. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 69:890–902 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bowling N, Beehr T, Swader W. 2005. Giving and receiving social support at work: the roles of personality and reciprocity. J. Vocat. Behav. 67:476–89 [Google Scholar]
  18. Brandtstädter J, Renner G. 1990. Tenacious goal pursuit and flexible goal adjustment: explication and age-related analysis of assimilative and accommodative strategies of coping. Psychol. Aging 5:58–67 [Google Scholar]
  19. Brehm JW, Self EA. 1989. The intensity of motivation. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 40:109–31 [Google Scholar]
  20. Brezo J, Paris J, Turecki G. 2006. Personality traits as correlates of suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and suicide completions: a systematic review. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 113:180–206 [Google Scholar]
  21. Carver CS. 2004. Negative affects deriving from the behavioral approach system. Emotion 4:3–22 [Google Scholar]
  22. Carver CS. 2007. Stress, coping, and health. Foundations of Health Psychology HS Friedman, RC Silver 117–44 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  23. Carver CS, Harmon-Jones E. 2009. Anger is an approach-related affect: evidence and implications. Psychol. Bull. 135:183–204 [Google Scholar]
  24. Carver CS, Pozo C, Harris SD, Noriega V, Scheier MF. et al. 1993. How coping mediates the effect of optimism on distress: a study of women with early stage breast cancer. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 65:375–90 [Google Scholar]
  25. Carver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK. 1989. Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 56:267–83 [Google Scholar]
  26. Carver CS, Scheier MF. 1998. On the Self-Regulation of Behavior New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  27. Carver CS, Scheier MF. 2008. Perspectives on Personality Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 6th ed.. [Google Scholar]
  28. Carver CS, Scheier MF, Miller CJ, Fulford D. 2009. Optimism. Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology CR Snyder, SJ Lopez 303–11 New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  29. Casey BJ, Getz S, Galvan A. 2008. The adolescent brain. Dev. Rev. 28:62–77 [Google Scholar]
  30. Caspi A, Roberts BW, Shiner RL. 2005. Personality development: stability and change. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 56:453–84 [Google Scholar]
  31. Caspi A, Shiner RL. 2006. Personality development. Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. 3. Social, Emotional, and Personality Development, series ed. W Damon, R Lerner , vol. ed. N Eisenberg 300–65 New York: Wiley, 6th ed.. [Google Scholar]
  32. Cervone D. 2005. Personality architecture: within-person structures and processes. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 56:423–52 [Google Scholar]
  33. Chida Y, Hamer M. 2008. Chronic psychosocial factors and acute physiological responses to laboratory-induced stress in healthy populations: a quantitative review of 30 years of investigations. Psychol. Bull. 134:829–85 [Google Scholar]
  34. Chung MC, Dennis I, Easthope Y, Werrett J, Farmer S. 2005. A multiple-indicator multiple-cause model for posttraumatic stress reactions: personality, coping, and maladjustment. Psychosom. Med. 67:251–59 [Google Scholar]
  35. Clarke AT. 2006. Coping with interpersonal stress and psychosocial health among children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. J. Youth Adolesc. 35:11–24 [Google Scholar]
  36. Cohen J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  37. Compas BE, Connor-Smith JK, Jaser SS. 2004. Temperament, stress reactivity, and coping: implications for depression in childhood and adolescence. J. Clin. Child Adolesc. Psychol. 33:21–31 [Google Scholar]
  38. Compas BE, Connor-Smith JK, Saltzman H, Thomsen AH, Wadsworth ME. 2001. Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: problems, progress, and potential in theory and research. Psychol. Bull. 127:87–127 [Google Scholar]
  39. Connor-Smith JK, Compas BE. 2002. Vulnerability to social stress: coping as a mediator or moderator of sociotropy and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Cogn. Ther. Res. 26:39–55 [Google Scholar]
  40. Connor-Smith JK, Compas BE. 2004. Coping as a moderator of relations between reactivity to interpersonal stress, health status, and internalizing problems. Cogn. Ther. Res. 28:347–68 [Google Scholar]
  41. Connor-Smith JK, Flachsbart C. 2007. Relations between personality and coping: a meta-analysis. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 93:1080–107 [Google Scholar]
  42. Costa PT Jr, McCrae RR. 1985. The NEO Personality Inventory Manual Odessa, FL: Psychol. Assess. Resourc. [Google Scholar]
  43. Cramer P. 2003. Personality change in later adulthood is predicted by defense mechanism use in early adulthood. J. Res. Personal. 37:76–104 [Google Scholar]
  44. Davidson RJ. 1998. Affective style and affective disorders: perspectives from affective neuroscience. Cogn. Emot. 12:307–30 [Google Scholar]
  45. DeLongis A, Holtzman S. 2005. Coping in context: the role of stress, social support, and personality in coping. J. Personal. 73:1–24 [Google Scholar]
  46. Depue RA, Collins PF. 1999. Neurobiology of the structure of personality: dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion. Behav. Brain Sci. 22:491–517 [Google Scholar]
  47. Depue RA, Morrone-Strupinksy JV. 2005. A neurobehavioral model of affiliative bonding: implications for conceptualizing a human trait of affiliation. Behav. Brain Sci. 28:313–95 [Google Scholar]
  48. Derryberry D, Reed MA, Pilkenton-Taylor C. 2003. Temperament and coping: advantages of an individual differences perspective. Dev. Psychopathol. 15:1049–66 [Google Scholar]
  49. Digman JM. 1990. Personality structure: emergence of the five-factor model. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 41:417–40 [Google Scholar]
  50. Digman JM, Inouye J. 1986. Further specification of the five robust factors of personality. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 50:116–23 [Google Scholar]
  51. Duangdao KM, Roesch SC. 2008. Coping with diabetes in adulthood: a meta-analysis. J. Behav. Med. 31:291–300 [Google Scholar]
  52. Dunkley DM, Zuroff DC, Blankstein KR. 2003. Self-critical perfectionism and daily affect: dispositional and situational influences on stress and coping. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 84:234–52 [Google Scholar]
  53. Eccles JS, Wigfield A. 2002. Motivational beliefs, values and goals. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 53:109–32 [Google Scholar]
  54. Eisenberg N, Fabes RA, Guthrie I. 1997. Coping with stress: the roles of regulation and development. Handbook of Children's Coping with Common Stressors: Linking Theory, Research, and Intervention JN Sandler, SA Wolchik 41–70 New York: Plenum [Google Scholar]
  55. Elliot AJ. 2008. Handbook of Approach and Avoidance Motivation New York: Psychology Press [Google Scholar]
  56. Elliot AJ, Thrash TM. 2002. Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 82:804–18 [Google Scholar]
  57. Epstein S. 1980. The stability of behavior: II. Implications for psychological research. Am. Psychol. 35:790–806 [Google Scholar]
  58. Evans DE, Rothbart MK. 2007. Developing a model for adult temperament. J. Res. Personal. 41:868–88 [Google Scholar]
  59. Eysenck HJ. 1975. The Inequality of Man San Diego, CA: EdITS [Google Scholar]
  60. Eysenck HJ. 1986. Models and paradigms in personality research. Personality Psychology in Europe, Vol. 2: Current Trends and Controversies, ed. A Angleitner, A Furnham, G Van Heck 213–23 Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger [Google Scholar]
  61. Folkman S. 1997. Positive psychological states and coping with severe stress. Soc. Sci. Med. 45:1207–21 [Google Scholar]
  62. Folkman S. 2008. The case for positive emotions in the stress response. Anx. Stress Coping 21:3–14 [Google Scholar]
  63. Folkman S, Moskowitz JT. 2004. Coping: pitfalls and promise. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55:745–74 [Google Scholar]
  64. Fowles DC. 1993. Biological variables in psychopathology: a psychobiological perspective. Comprehensive Handbook of Psychopathology PB Sutker, HE Adams 57–82 New York: Plenum, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  65. Friedman HS. 2008. The multiple linkages of personality and disease. Brain Behav. Immun. 22:668–75 [Google Scholar]
  66. Funder DC. 2001. Personality. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52:197–221 [Google Scholar]
  67. Gil KM, Wilson JJ, Edens JL. 1997. The stability of pain coping strategies in young children, adolescents, and adults with sickle cell disease over an 18-month period. Clin. J. Pain 13:110–15 [Google Scholar]
  68. Goldberg LR. 1981. Language and individual differences: the search for universals in personality lexicons. Review of Personality and Social Psychology L Wheeler 2141–65 Beverly Hills, CA: Sage [Google Scholar]
  69. Gomez R, Bounds J, Holmberg K, Fullarton C, Gomez A. 1999. Effects of neuroticism and avoidant coping style on maladjustment during early adolescence. Personal. Individ. Diff. 26:305–319 [Google Scholar]
  70. Grant S, Langan-Fox J. 2006. Occupational stress, coping, and strain: the combined/interactive effect of the Big Five traits. Personal. Individ. Differ. 41:719–32 [Google Scholar]
  71. Grant S, Langan-Fox J. 2007. Personality and the occupational stressor-strain relationship: the role of the Big Five. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 12:20–33 [Google Scholar]
  72. Gray JA. 1994. Personality dimensions and emotion systems. The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions P Ekman, RJ Davidson 329–31 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  73. Graziano WG, Eisenberg NH. 1999. Agreeableness as a dimension of personality. Handbook of Personality R Hogan, J Johnson, S Briggs 795–825 San Diego, CA: Academic [Google Scholar]
  74. Graziano WG, Habashi MM, Sheese BE, Tobin RM. 2007. Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: a person X situation perspective. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 93:583–99 [Google Scholar]
  75. Graziano WG, Jensen-Campbell LA, Hair EC. 1996. Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: the case for agreeableness. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 70:820–35 [Google Scholar]
  76. Gunthert KC, Cohen LH, Armeli S. 1999. Role of neuroticism in daily stress and coping. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 77:1087–100 [Google Scholar]
  77. Hasking PA. 2006. Reinforcement sensitivity, coping, disordered eating, and drinking behavior in adolescents. Personal. Individ. Differ. 40:677–88 [Google Scholar]
  78. Hasking PA. 2007. Reinforcement sensitivity, coping, and delinquent behavior in adolescents. J. Adolesc. 30:739–49 [Google Scholar]
  79. Helgeson VS, Reynolds KA, Tomich PL. 2006. A meta-analytic approach to benefit finding and health. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 74:797–816 [Google Scholar]
  80. Higgins ET. 1996. Ideals, oughts, and regulatory focus: affect and motivation from distinct pains and pleasures. The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior PM Gollwitzer, JA Bargh 91–114 New York: Guilford [Google Scholar]
  81. Higgins ET, Shah J, Friedman R. 1997. Emotional responses to goal attainment: strength of regulatory focus as moderator. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 72:515–25 [Google Scholar]
  82. Hobfoll SE. 1989. Conservation of resources: a new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Am. Psychol. 44:513–24 [Google Scholar]
  83. Hobfoll SE. 1998. Stress, Culture, and Community New York: Plenum [Google Scholar]
  84. Holahan CJ, Moos RH. 1990. Life stressors, resistance factors, and improved psychological functioning: an extension of the stress resistance paradigm. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 58:909–17 [Google Scholar]
  85. Jang KL, Thordarson DS, Stein MB, Cohan SL, Taylor S. 2007. Coping styles and personality: a biometric analysis. Anx. Stress Coping 20:17–24 [Google Scholar]
  86. Jensen-Campbell LA, Adams R, Perry DG, Workman KA, Furdella JQ, Egan SK. 2002. Agreeableness, extraversion, and peer relations in early adolescence: winning friends and deflecting aggression. J. Res. Personal. 36:224–51 [Google Scholar]
  87. Jensen-Campbell LA, Graziano WG. 2001. Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. J. Personal. 69:323–62 [Google Scholar]
  88. John OP, Srivastava S. 1999. The Big Five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research LA Pervin, OP John 102–38 New York: Guilford, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  89. Kern ML, Friedman HS. 2008. Do conscientious individuals live longer? A quantitative review. Health Psychol. 27:505–12 [Google Scholar]
  90. Klinger E. 1975. Consequences of commitment to and disengagement from incentives. Psychol. Rev. 82:1–25 [Google Scholar]
  91. Knoll N, Rieckmann N, Schwarzer R. 2005. Coping as a mediator between personality and stress outcomes: a longitudinal study with cataract surgery patients. Eur. J. Personal. 19:229–47 [Google Scholar]
  92. Kochanska G, Knaack A. 2003. Effortful control as a personality characteristic of young children: antecedents, correlates, and consequences. J. Personal. 71:1087–112 [Google Scholar]
  93. Lazarus RS. 1966. Psychological Stress and the Coping Process New York: McGraw-Hill [Google Scholar]
  94. Lazarus RS. 1999. Stress and Emotion: A New Synthesis New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
  95. Lazarus RS. 2006. Emotions and interpersonal relationships: toward a person-centered conceptualization of emotions and coping. J. Personal. 74:9–46 [Google Scholar]
  96. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. 1984. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
  97. Lee-Baggley D, Preece M, DeLongis A. 2005. Coping with interpersonal stress: role of Big Five traits. J. Personal. 73:1141–80 [Google Scholar]
  98. Lengua LJ, Sandler IN, West SG, Wolchik SA, Curran PJ. 1999. Emotionality and self-regulation, threat appraisal, and coping in children of divorce. Dev. Psychopathol. 11:15–37 [Google Scholar]
  99. Littleton H, Horsley S, John S, Nelson DV. 2007. Trauma coping strategies and psychological distress: a meta-analysis. J. Traumatic Stress 20:977–88 [Google Scholar]
  100. Lonigan CJ, Phillips BM. 2001. Temperamental basis of anxiety disorders in children. The Developmental Psychopathology of Anxiety MW Vasey, MR Dadds 60–91 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  101. Lucas RE, Diener E, Grob A, Suh EM, Shao L. 2000. Cross-cultural evidence for the fundamental features of extraversion. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 79:452–68 [Google Scholar]
  102. Malouff JM, Thorsteinsson EB, Rooke SE, Schutte NS. 2007. Alcohol involvement and the five-factor model of personality: a meta-analysis. J. Drug Educ. 37:277–94 [Google Scholar]
  103. Malouff JM, Thorsteinsson EB, Schutte NS. 2005. The relationship between the five-factor model of personality and symptoms of clinical disorders: a meta-analysis. J. Psychopathol. Behav. Assess. 27:101–14 [Google Scholar]
  104. Marshall GN, Wortman CB, Kusulas JW, Hervig LK, Vickers RR Jr. 1992. Distinguishing optimism from pessimism: relations to fundamental dimensions of mood and personality. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 62:1067–74 [Google Scholar]
  105. McAdams DP, Olson BD. 2010. Personality development: continuity and change. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 61: 517–42 [Google Scholar]
  106. McCrae RR. 1996. Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychol. Bull. 120:323–37 [Google Scholar]
  107. McCrae RR, Costa PT Jr. 2003. Personality in Adulthood: A Five-Factor Theory Perspective New York: Guilford, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  108. McCrae RR, Costa PT Jr, Ostendorf F, Angleitner A, Hrebickova M. et al. 2000. Nature over nurture: temperament, personality, and life span development. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 78:173–86 [Google Scholar]
  109. McCrae RR, John OP. 1992. Introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. J. Personal. 60:175–215 [Google Scholar]
  110. Meier BP, Robinson MD. 2004. Does quick to blame mean quick to anger? The role of agreeableness in dissociating blame and anger. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 30:856–67 [Google Scholar]
  111. Meier BP, Robinson MD, Wilkowski BM. 2006. Turning the other cheek: agreeableness and the regulation of aggression-related primes. Psychol. Sci. 17:136–42 [Google Scholar]
  112. Miles JNV, Hempel S. 2003. The Eysenck personality scales: the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised (EPQ-R) and the Eysenck Personality Profiler (EPP). Comprehensive Handbook of Psychological Assessment: Personality Assessment M Hersen, M Hilsenroth, D Segal 299–107 New York: Wiley [Google Scholar]
  113. Miller GE, Wrosch C. 2007. You've gotta know when to fold 'em: goal disengagement and systemic inflammation in adolescence. Psychol. Sci. 18:773–77 [Google Scholar]
  114. Mischel W. 2004. Toward an integrative science of the person. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55:1–22 [Google Scholar]
  115. Moos RH, Holahan CJ. 2003. Dispositional and contextual perspectives on coping: toward an integrative framework. J. Clin. Psychol. 59:1387–403 [Google Scholar]
  116. Moos RH, Schaefer JA. 1993. Coping resources and processes: current concepts and measures. Handbook of Stress: Theoretical and Clinical Aspects L Goldberger, S Breznitz 234–57 New York: Free Press, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  117. Morling B, Evered S. 2006. Secondary control reviewed and defined. Psychol. Bull. 132:269–96 [Google Scholar]
  118. Moskowitz JT, Hult JR, Bussolari C, Acree M. 2009. What works in coping with HIV? A meta-analysis with implications for coping with serious illness. Psychol. Bull. 135:121–41 [Google Scholar]
  119. Murberg TA, Bru E, Stephens P. 2002. Personality and coping among congestive heart failure patients. Personal. Individ. Differ. 32:775–84 [Google Scholar]
  120. Muris P. 2006. Unique and interactive effects of neuroticism and effortful control on psychopathological symptoms in nonclinical adolescents. Personal. Individ. Differ. 40:1409–19 [Google Scholar]
  121. Muris P, de Jong PJ, Engelen S. 2004. Relationships between neuroticism, attentional control, and anxiety disorders symptoms in nonclinical children. Personal. Individ. Differ. 37:789–97 [Google Scholar]
  122. Najmi S, Wegner DM. 2008. Thought suppression and psychopathology. Handbook of Approach and Avoidance Motivation A Elliott 447–59 Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum [Google Scholar]
  123. Nesse RM. 2000. Is depression an adaptation?. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 57:14–20 [Google Scholar]
  124. Newth S, DeLongis A. 2004. Individual differences, mood and coping with chronic pain in rheumatoid arthritis: a daily process analysis. Psychol. Health 19:283–305 [Google Scholar]
  125. Nigg JT. 2000. On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: views from cognitive and personality psychology as a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychol. Bull. 126:220–46 [Google Scholar]
  126. Nigg JT. 2003. Response inhibition and disruptive behaviors: toward a multiprocess conception of etiological heterogeneity for ADHD combined type and conduct disorder early-onset type. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1008:170–82 [Google Scholar]
  127. Nigg JT. 2006. Temperament and developmental psychopathology. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 47:395–422 [Google Scholar]
  128. Ozer DJ, Benet-Martínez VB. 2006. Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 57:401–21 [Google Scholar]
  129. Park CL, Folkman S. 1997. Meaning in the context of stress and coping. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 1:115–44 [Google Scholar]
  130. Park CL, Lechner SC, Antoni MH, Stanton AL. 2009. Medical Illness and Positive Life Change: Can Crisis Lead to Personal Transformation? Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc. [Google Scholar]
  131. Peabody D, Goldberg LR. 1989. Some determinants of factor structures from personality-trait descriptors. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 57:552–67 [Google Scholar]
  132. Penley JA, Tomaka J. 2002. Associations among the Big Five, emotional responses, and coping with acute stress. Personal. Individ. Differ. 32:1215–28 [Google Scholar]
  133. Penley JA, Tomaka J, Wiebe JS. 2002. The association of coping to physical and psychological health outcomes: a meta-analytic review. J. Behav. Med. 25:551–603 [Google Scholar]
  134. Powers DV, Gallagher-Thompson D, Kraemer HC. 2003. Coping and depression in Alzheimer's caregivers: longitudinal evidence of stability. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Soc. Sci. 57:205–11 [Google Scholar]
  135. Prokopcakova A. 2004. Choice of coping strategies in the interaction: anxiety and type of a demanding life situation (a research probe). Studia Psychologica 46:235–38 [Google Scholar]
  136. Ptacek JT, Pierce GR, Thompson EL. 2005. Finding evidence of dispositional coping. J. Res. Personal. 40:1137–51 [Google Scholar]
  137. Ptacek JT, Smith RE, Espe K, Raffety B. 1994. Limited correspondence between daily coping reports and retrospective coping recall. Psychol. Assess. 6:41–49 [Google Scholar]
  138. Ptacek JT, Smith RE, Raffety BD, Lindgren KP. 2008. Coherence and transituational generality in coping: the unity and the diversity. Anx. Stress Coping 21:155–72 [Google Scholar]
  139. Rasmussen HN, Scheier MF, Greenhouse JB. 2009. Optimism and physical health: a meta-analytic review. Ann. Behav. Med. In press
  140. Roberts BW, DelVecchio WF. 2000. The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: a quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychol. Bull. 126:3–25 [Google Scholar]
  141. Roberts BW, Walton KE, Bogg T. 2005. Conscientiousness and health across the life course. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 9:156–68 [Google Scholar]
  142. Roesch SC, Adams L, Hines A, Palmores A, Vyas P. et al. 2005. Coping with prostate cancer: a meta-analytic review. J. Behav. Med. 28:281–93 [Google Scholar]
  143. Rolls ET. 2005. Emotion Explained Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  144. Roth S, Cohen LJ. 1986. Approach, avoidance, and coping with stress. Am. Psychol. 41:813–19 [Google Scholar]
  145. Rothbart MK, Ellis LK, Posner MI. 2004. Temperament and self-regulation. Handbook of Self-Regulation: Research, Theory, and Applications RF Baumeister, KD Vohs 357–70 New York: Guilford [Google Scholar]
  146. Rothbart MK, Hwang J. 2005. Temperament and the development of competence and motivation. Handbook of Competence and Motivation AJ Elliot, CS Dweck 167–84 New York: Guilford [Google Scholar]
  147. Rothbart MK, Rueda MR. 2005. The development of effortful control. Developing Individuality in the Human Brain: A Tribute to Michael I. Posner U Mayr, E Awh, S Keele 167–88 Washington, DC: Am . Psychol. Assoc. [Google Scholar]
  148. Ryan RM, Deci EL. 2001. On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52:141–66 [Google Scholar]
  149. Scheier MF, Carver CS. 1992. Effects of optimism on psychological and physical well-being: theoretical overview and empirical update. Cogn. Ther. Res. 16:201–28 [Google Scholar]
  150. Schwartz JE, Neale JM, Marco CA, Shiffman S, Stone AA. 1999. Does trait coping exist? A momentary assessment approach to the evaluation of traits. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 77:360–69 [Google Scholar]
  151. Skinner EA, Edge K, Altman J, Sherwood H. 2003. Searching for the structure of coping: a review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychol. Bull. 129:216–69 [Google Scholar]
  152. Skinner EA, Zimmer-Gembeck MJ. 2007. The development of coping. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 58:119–44 [Google Scholar]
  153. Smith RE, Leffingwell TR, Ptacek JT. 1999. Can people remember how they coped? Factors associated with discordance between same-day and retrospective reports. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 76:1050–61 [Google Scholar]
  154. Solberg Nes L, Segerstrom SC. 2006. Dispositional optimism and coping: a meta-analytic review. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 10:235–51 [Google Scholar]
  155. Stanton AL, Snider PR. 1993. Coping with a breast cancer diagnosis: a prospective study. Health Psychol. 12:16–23 [Google Scholar]
  156. Steel P, Schmidt J, Shultz J. 2008. Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychol. Bull. 134:138–61 [Google Scholar]
  157. Stone AA, Kennedy-Moore E, Neale JM. 1995. Association between daily coping and end-of-day mood. Health Psychol. 14:341–49 [Google Scholar]
  158. Suls J, Martin R. 2005. The daily life of the garden-variety neurotic: reactivity, stressor exposure, mood spillover, and maladaptive coping. J. Personal. 73:1485–509 [Google Scholar]
  159. Tellegen A. 1985. Structure of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety, with an emphasis on self-report. Anxiety and the Anxiety Disorders AH Tuma, JD Maser 681–706 Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum [Google Scholar]
  160. Tennen H, Affleck G. 2002. Benefit-finding and benefit-reminding. Handbook of Positive Psychology CR Snyder, SJ Lopez 584–97 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  161. Tennen H, Affleck G, Armeli S, Carney MA. 2000. A daily process approach to coping: linking theory, research, and practice. Am. Psychol. 55:626–36 [Google Scholar]
  162. Tomaka J, Blascovich J, Kelsey RM, Leitten CL. 1993. Subjective, physiological, and behavioral effects of threat and challenge appraisal. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 65:248–60 [Google Scholar]
  163. Tong EM, Bishop GD, Diong SM, Enkelmann HC, Why YP. et al. 2004. Social support and personality among male police officers in Singapore. Personal. Individ. Differ. 36:109–23 [Google Scholar]
  164. Trapmann S, Hell B, Hirn JW, Schuler H. 2007. Meta-analysis of the relationship between the Big Five and academic success at university. J. Psychol. 215:132–51 [Google Scholar]
  165. Vollrath M. 2001. Personality and stress. Scand. J. Psychol. 42:335–47 [Google Scholar]
  166. Vollrath M, Torgersen S. 2000. Personality types and coping. Personal. Individ. Differ. 29:367–78 [Google Scholar]
  167. Wright RA. 1996. Brehm's theory of motivation as a model of effort and cardiovascular response. The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior PM Gollwitzer, JA Bargh 424–53 New York: Guilford [Google Scholar]
  168. Wrosch C, Miller GE, Scheier MF, Brun de Pontet S. 2007. Giving up on unattainable goals: benefits for health?. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 33:251–65 [Google Scholar]
  169. Zuckerman M, Kuhlman DM, Joireman J, Teta P, Kraft M. 1993. A comparison of three structural models for personality: the Big Three, the Big Five, and the Alternative Five. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 65:757–68 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100352
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100352
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error