1932

Abstract

“Imitation” in contemporary anthropology comprises numerous topics whose relations have seldom been explored. In surveying mimetic phenomena that range from television parodies to postural mirroring, I offer reflections designed to stimulate exploration of “mimetic practice.” The review encourages work at the nexus of sociocultural and linguistic anthropology, for without appreciating the communicative specificities of mimetic practice, one can neither narrate nor theorize adequately what mimesis does, and thus is. I chart directions in research by drawing out underappreciated findings from the ethnographic record, such as those that show that mimesis is not a matter of two-ness, as the original–copy binary suggests; that communicative dissonance often helps actors recognize when mimesis is in play and what action(s) it involves; that mimetic practice suffers (and sometimes benefits) from various instabilities (e.g., what is imitated, who imitates whom); and that reflexivity helps create, stabilize, and alter mimetic practices and projects.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030008
2014-10-21
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/anthro/43/1/annurev-anthro-102313-030008.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030008&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abrahams RD. 1986. Complicity and imitation in storytelling: a pragmatic folklorist's perspective. Cult. Anthropol. 1:223–37 [Google Scholar]
  2. Agha A. 2007. Language and Social Relations New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  3. Agha A, Wortham SEF. 2005. Special issue: Discourse Across Speech Events: Intertextuality and Interdiscursivity in Social Life. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 15:1–150 [Google Scholar]
  4. Alim HS, Ibrahim A, Pennycook A. 2009. Global Linguistic Flows: Hip Hop Cultures, Youth Identities, and the Politics of Language New York: Routledge
  5. Appiah KA. 1994. Identity, authenticity, survival: multicultural societies and social reproduction. Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition149–63 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  6. Apter A. 1999. IBB = 419: Nigerian democracy and the politics of illusion. Civil Society and the Political Imagination in Africa: Critical Perspectives JL Comaroff, J Comaroff 267–307 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  7. Arbib MA. 2011. From mirror neurons to complex imitation in the evolution of language and tool use. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 40:257–73 [Google Scholar]
  8. Auer JCP, Couper-Kuhlen E, Müller F. 1999. Language in Time: The Rhythm and Tempo of Spoken Interaction New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  9. Auerbach E. 1968. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  10. Bakhtin MM. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination, ed. /transl. M Holquist, transl. C Emerson Austin: Univ. Tex. Press
  11. Bakhtin MM. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
  12. Bakhtin MM. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays C Emerson, M Holquist, transl. VM McGee. Austin: Univ. Tex. Press
  13. Barthes R. 1977. The death of the author. Image-Music-Text transl. S Health 142–48 London: Fontana [Google Scholar]
  14. Basso KH. 1979. Portraits of “The Whiteman”: Linguistic Play and Cultural Symbols Among The Western Apache Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  15. Bateson G. 1972. A theory of play and fantasy. Steps to an Ecology of Mind177–93 New York: Ballantine Books [Google Scholar]
  16. Baudrillard J. 1994. Simulacra and Simulation Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
  17. Bauman R. 1983. Let Your Words Be Few: Symbolism of Speaking and Silence Among Seventeenth-Century Quakers New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  18. Bauman R. 2004. A World of Others' Words: Cross-Cultural Perspectives On Intertextuality Malden:, MA: Oxford: Blackwell
  19. Bauman R, Briggs CL. 1990. Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 19:59–88 [Google Scholar]
  20. Bauman R, Briggs CL. 2003. Voices of Modernity: Language Ideologies and the Politics of Inequality Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  21. Bauman R, Feaster P. 2005. “Fellow townsmen and my noble constituents!”: representations of oratory on early commercial recordings. Oral Tradit. 20:35–57 [Google Scholar]
  22. Bavelas JB, Black A, Lemery CR, Mullett J. 1987. Motor mimicry as primitive empathy. Empathy and Its Development N Eisenberg, J Strayer 317–38 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  23. Benjamin W. 1985. The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. Illuminations: Essays and Reflections H Arendt, transl. H Zohn 217–51 New York: Schocken [Google Scholar]
  24. Bernieri FJ, Rosenthal R. 1991. Interpersonal coordination: behavior matching and interactional synchrony. Fundamentals of Nonverbal Behavior RS Feldman, B Rimaé 401–32 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  25. Bhabha HK. 1994. Of mimicry and man: the ambivalence of colonial discourse. The Location of Culture85–92 London/New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  26. Bourdieu P. 1977. The economics of linguistic exchanges. Soc. Sci. Inform. 16:645–68 [Google Scholar]
  27. Bourdieu P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste transl. R Nice Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  28. Bruner EM. 1994. Abraham Lincoln as authentic reproduction: a critique of postmodernism. Am. Anthropol. 96:397–415 [Google Scholar]
  29. Bucholtz M. 1999. You da man: narrating the racial other in the production of white masculinity. J. Sociol. 3:443–60 [Google Scholar]
  30. Bucholtz M. 2011. White Kids: Language, Race and Styles of Youth Identity New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  31. Bucholtz M, Hall K. 2004. Language and identity. A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology A Duranti 369–94 Malden, MA: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  32. Butler JP. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity New York: Routledge
  33. Byrne RW. 2003. Imitation as behaviour parsing. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 358:529–36 [Google Scholar]
  34. Chartrand TL, Bargh JA. 1999. The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 76:893–910 [Google Scholar]
  35. Chun EW. 2009. Ideologies of legitimate mockery: Margaret Cho's revoicings of mock Asian. Beyond Yellow English: Toward a Linguistic Anthropology of Asian Pacific America A Reyes, A Lo 261–87 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  36. Collins R. 2004. Interaction Ritual Chains Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. . Press
  37. Condon WS, Ogston WD. 1967. A segmentation of behavior. J. Psychiatr. Res. 5:221–35 [Google Scholar]
  38. Couper-Kuhlen E. 1996. The prosody of repetition: on quoting and mimicry. Prosody in Conversation E Couper-Kuhlen, M Selting 366–405 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  39. Coupland N. 2001. Dialect stylization in radio talk. Lang. Soc. 30:345–75 [Google Scholar]
  40. Dent AS. 2012. Piracy, circulatory legitimacy, and neoliberal subjectivity in Brazil. Cult. Anthropol. 27:28–49 [Google Scholar]
  41. Derrida J. 1988. Limited Inc G Graff, transl. J Mehlman, S Weber Evanston, IL: Northwest. Univ. Press
  42. Downey G. 2008. Scaffolding imitation in capoeira: physical education and enculturation in an Afro-Brazilian art. Am. Anthropol. 110:204–13 [Google Scholar]
  43. Du Bois JW. 2007. The stance triangle. Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction R Englebretson 139–82 Amsterdam: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
  44. Eaton N. 2004. Between mimesis and alterity: art, gift, and diplomacy in colonial India, 1770–1800. Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist. 46:816–44 [Google Scholar]
  45. Eliade M. 1959. The Myth of the Eternal Return: Cosmos and History New York: Harper
  46. Enfield NJ. 2009. The Anatomy of Meaning: Speech, Gesture, and Composite Utterances New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  47. Erickson F. 2004. Talk and Social Theory: Ecologies of Speaking and Listening in Everyday Life Cambridge, UK: Polity
  48. Erickson F, Shultz J. 1982. The Counselor as Gatekeeper: Social Interaction in Interviews New York: Academic
  49. Fanon F. 1982. Black Skin, White Masks New York: Grove
  50. Ferguson JG. 2002. Of mimicry and membership: Africans and the “new world society.”. Cult. Anthropol. 17:551–69 [Google Scholar]
  51. Ferrara K. 1994. Repetition as rejoinder in therapeutic discourse: echoing and mirroring. Repetition in Discourse: Interdisciplinary Perspectives B Johnstone 66–83 Norwood, NJ: Ablex [Google Scholar]
  52. Fleming L, Lempert M. 2014. Poetics and performativity. Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology NJ Enfield, P Kockelman, J Sidnell 469–95 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  53. Foucault M. 1984. What is an author?. Foucault Reader P Rabinow 101–20 New York: Pantheon [Google Scholar]
  54. Frazer SJG. 1963. The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion New York: Macmillan
  55. Freud S. 1962. Civilization and Its Discontents New York: Norton
  56. Friedman J. 1995. Global system, globalization, and the parameters of modernity. Global Modernities F Feathersone, S Lash, R Robertson 69–90 London: Sage [Google Scholar]
  57. Geertz C. 1973. Thick description: toward an interpretive theory of culture. The Interpretation of Cultures 3–30 New York: Basic Books [Google Scholar]
  58. Goffman E. 1961. Role distance. Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction84–152 New York: Bobbs-Merrill [Google Scholar]
  59. Goffman E. 1963. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity New York: Simon & Schuster
  60. Goffman E. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience New York: Harper Colophon
  61. Goffman E. 1978. Response cries. Language 54:787–815 [Google Scholar]
  62. Goffman E. 1981. Footing. Forms of Talk E Goffman 124–59 Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press [Google Scholar]
  63. Goodman N. 1972. Seven strictures on similarity. Problems and Projects N Goodman 437–46 New York: Bobbs-Merrill [Google Scholar]
  64. Goodwin MH. 1990. He-Said-She-Said: Talk as Social Organization Among Black Children Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press
  65. Graham L. 1993. A public sphere in Amazonia? The depersonalized collaborative construction of discourse in Xavante. Am. Ethnol. 20:717–41 [Google Scholar]
  66. Gumperz JJ. 1982. Discourse Strategies Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  67. Halberstam J. 1998. Female Masculinity Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  68. Handler R, Gable E. 1997. The New History in an Old Museum: Creating the Past at Colonial Williamsburg Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  69. Handler R, Saxton W. 1988. Dyssimulation: reflexivity, narrative, and the quest for authenticity in “living history.”. Cult. Anthropol. 3:242–60 [Google Scholar]
  70. Hanks WF. 1989. Text and textuality. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 18:95–127 [Google Scholar]
  71. Hatfield E, Cacioppo JT, Rapson RL. 1994. Emotional Contagion Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  72. Heyman JMcC. 2009. Trust, privilege, and discretion in the governance of the US borderlands with Mexico. Can. J. Law Soc. 24:367–90 [Google Scholar]
  73. Hill JH. 2008. The Everyday Language of White Racism Chichester, UK/Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell
  74. Hill JH, Irvine JT. 1993. Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  75. Hurley S, Chater N. 2005a. Perspectives on Imitation 1 From Neuroscience to Social Science - Mechanisms of Imitation and Imitation in Animals Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  76. Hurley S, Chater N. 2005b. Perspectives on Imitation. 2 From Neuroscience to Social Science - Imitation, Human Development, and Culture Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  77. Irvine JT. 2011. Leaky registers and eight-hundred-pound gorillas. Anthropol. Q. 84:15–39 [Google Scholar]
  78. Itzkovitz D. 2001. Passing like me: Jewish chameleonism and the politics of race. Passing: Identity and Interpretation in Sexuality, Race, and Religion MC Sánchez, L Schlossberg 38–63 New York: N.Y. Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  79. Jackson JL. 2005. Real Black: Adventures in Racial Sincerity Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  80. Jakobson R. 1960. Closing statement: linguistics and poetics. Style in Language T Sebeok 350–77 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  81. Jameson F. 1989. Postmodernism and consumer society. The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture H Foster 111–25 Seattle, WA: Bay Press [Google Scholar]
  82. Karsenti B. 2010. Imitation: returning to the Tarde-Durkheim debate. The Social After Gabriel Tarde: Debates and Assessments M Candea 44–61 London/New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  83. Keane W. 2003. Semiotics and the social analysis of material things. Lang. Commun. 23:409–25 [Google Scholar]
  84. Keenan (Ochs) E 1977. Making it last: uses of repetition in child language. Child Discourse SM Ervin-Tripp, C Mitchell-Kernan 125–38 New York: Academic [Google Scholar]
  85. Keevallik L. 2010. Bodily quoting in dance correction. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 43:401–26 [Google Scholar]
  86. Kinsbourne M. 2005. Imitation as entrainment: brain mechanisms and social consequences. See Hurley & Chater 2005b 163–72
  87. Kuipers JC. 1998. Language, Identity, and Marginality in Indonesia: The Changing Nature of Ritual Speech on the Island of Sumba New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  88. LaFrance M. 1982. Posture mirroring and rapport. Interaction Rhythms: Periodicity in Communicative Behavior M Davis 279–97 New York: Hum. Sci. Press [Google Scholar]
  89. Langford JM. 1999. Medical mimesis: healing signs of a cosmopolitan “quack.”. Am. Ethnol. 26:24–46 [Google Scholar]
  90. Le Bon G. 1977. The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind New York: Penguin
  91. Lee B, LiPuma E. 2002. Cultures of circulation: the imaginations of modernity. Public Cult. 14:191–213 [Google Scholar]
  92. Lemon A. 2000. Between Two Fires: Gypsy Performance and Romani Memory from Pushkin to Post-Socialism Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  93. Lemon A. 2004. “Dealing emotional blows”: realism and verbal “terror” at the Russian state theatrical academy. Lang. Commun. 24:313–37 [Google Scholar]
  94. Lempert M. 2008. The poetics of stance: text-metricality, epistemicity, interaction. Lang. Soc. 37:569–92 [Google Scholar]
  95. Lempert M. 2012a. Discipline and Debate: The Language of Violence in a Tibetan Buddhist Monastery Berkeley: Univ Calif. Press
  96. Lempert M. 2012b. Where the action isn't: review article on Nick Enfield's. The Anatomy of Meaning. Speech, Gesture, and Composite Utterances. Lang. Soc. 41:259–66 [Google Scholar]
  97. Lempert M. 2013. No ordinary ethics. Anthropol. Theory 13:370–93 [Google Scholar]
  98. Lempert M, Silverstein M. 2012. Creatures of Politics: Media, Message, and the American Presidency Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press
  99. Lerner GH. 2002. Turn-sharing: the choral co-production of talk-in-interaction. The Language of Turn and Sequence CE Ford, BA Fox, SA Thompson 225–56 Oxford/New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  100. Loehr DP. 2004. Gesture and intonation DPhil Thesis, Georgetown Univ., Washington, DC
  101. Loewen S, Philp J. 2006. Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. Mod. Lang. J. 90:536–56 [Google Scholar]
  102. Mackey A, Philp J. 1998. Conversational interaction and second language development: recasts, response, and red herrings?. Mod. Lang. J. 82:338–56 [Google Scholar]
  103. Massumi B. 1987. Realer than real: the simulacrum according to Deleuze and Guattari. Copyright 1:90–97 [Google Scholar]
  104. McNeill D. 1992. Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal About Thought Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  105. Merry SE. 2006. Transnational human rights and local activism: mapping the middle. Am. Anthropol. 108:38–51 [Google Scholar]
  106. Morson GS. 1989. Parody, history, and metaparody. Rethinking Bakhtin: Extensions and Challenges GS Morson, C Emerson 63–86 Evanston, IL: Northwest. Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  107. Nakassis CV. 2012. Counterfeiting what? Aesthetics of brandedness and BRAND in Tamil Nadu, India. Anthropol. Q. 85:701–22 [Google Scholar]
  108. Nakassis CV. 2013. Citation and citationality. Signs Soc. 1:151–78 [Google Scholar]
  109. Newell S. 2012. The Modernity Bluff: Crime, Consumption, and Citizenship in Côte d'Ivoire Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  110. Newton E. 1979. Mother Camp: Female Impersonators in America Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  111. Nielsen M, Tomaselli K. 2009. Over-imitation in the Kalahari Desert and the origins of human cultural cognition. Nat. Preced. http://hdl.handle.net/10101/npre.2009.3049.1
  112. Oushakine SA. 2001. The terrifying mimicry of Samizdat. Public Cult. 13:191–214 [Google Scholar]
  113. Pang L. 2008. “China who makes and fakes”: a semiotics of the counterfeit. Theory Cult. Soc. 25:117–40 [Google Scholar]
  114. Parmentier RJ. 1997. Special Issue: The Pragmatic Semiotics of Cultures. Semiotica 116:1–114 [Google Scholar]
  115. Peirce CS. 1955 [1902]. Logic as semiotic: the theory of signs. Philosophical Writings of Peirce J Buchler 98–115 New York: Dover [Google Scholar]
  116. Peirce CS. 1906. Prolegomena to an apology for pragmaticism. Monist 16:492–546 [Google Scholar]
  117. Perrino S. 2011. Biomédecine globale dans les rencontres ethnomédicales Sénégalaises. Communication et Société Wolof: Héritage et Création C Meyer, A Diagne, S Kesseler 389–421 Paris: L'Harmattan [Google Scholar]
  118. Rampton B. 2005. Crossing: Language and Ethnicity Among Adolescents Manchester, UK/Northampton, MA: St. Jerome
  119. Reeves M. 2013. Clean fake: authenticating documents and persons in migrant Moscow. Am. Ethnol. 40:508–24 [Google Scholar]
  120. Rorty R. 1986. On ethnocentrism: a reply to Clifford Geertz. Mich. Q. Rev. XXV:525–34 [Google Scholar]
  121. Sacks H, Schegloff EA, Jefferson G. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50:696–735 [Google Scholar]
  122. Scheflen AE. 1964. The significance of posture in communication systems. Psychiatry 27:316–31 [Google Scholar]
  123. Schwartz H. 1996. The Culture of the Copy: Striking Likenesses, Unreasonable Facsimiles New York: Zone Books
  124. Sclafani J. 2009. Martha Stewart behaving badly: parody and the symbolic meaning of style. J. Sociol. 13:613–33 [Google Scholar]
  125. Sidnell J. 2006. Coordinating gesture, talk, and gaze in reenactments. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 39:377–409 [Google Scholar]
  126. Silverstein M. 1984. On the pragmatic poetry of prose: parallelism, repetition, and cohesive structure in the time course of dyadic conversation. Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications D Schiffrin 181–99 Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  127. Silverstein M. 1992. The indeterminacy of contextualization: When is enough enough?. In The Contextualization of Language P Auer, A Di Luzio 55–76 Philadelphia: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
  128. Silverstein M. 2004. “Cultural” concepts and the language-culture nexus. Curr. Anthropol. 45:621–52 [Google Scholar]
  129. Silverstein M. 2005. Axes of evals: token versus type interdiscursivity. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 15:6–22 [Google Scholar]
  130. Silverstein M, Urban G. 1996. Natural Histories of Discourse Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  131. Stasch R. 2011. Ritual and oratory revisited: the semiotics of effective action. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 40:159–74 [Google Scholar]
  132. Stewart S. 1991. Notes on distressed genres. J. Am. Folklore 104:5–31 [Google Scholar]
  133. Stoller P. 1995. Embodying Colonial Memories: Spirit Possession, Power, and the Hauka in West Africa New York: Routledge
  134. Stoller P. 1996. Sounds and things: pulsations of power in Songhai. The Performance of Healing C Laderman, M Roseman 165–84 New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  135. Streeck J, Goodwin C, LeBaron CD. 2011. Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  136. Tambiah SJ. 1981. A Performative Approach to Ritual London: Br. Acad.
  137. Tannen D. 1987. Repetition in conversation: towards a poetics of talk. Language 63:574–605 [Google Scholar]
  138. Tannen D. 2007. Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  139. Tarde G. 1903. The Laws of Imitation transl. EWC Parsons. New York: Holt
  140. Taussig MT. 1993. Mimesis and Alterity: A Particular History of the Senses New York: Routledge
  141. Thorndike EL. 1898. Animal Intelligence: An Experimental Study of the Associative Processes in Animals New York/London: Macmillan
  142. Tomasello M. 1998. Emulation learning and cultural learning. Behav. Brain Sci. 21:703–4 [Google Scholar]
  143. Tomasello M, Carpenter M. 2005. Intention reading and imitative learning. See Hurley & Chater 2005b 133–48
  144. Tylor EB. 1913. Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Language, Art, and Custom London: John Murray
  145. Urban G. 1990. Ceremonial dialogues in South America. The Interpretation of Dialogue T Maranhão 99–119 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  146. Urban G. 2001. Metaculture: How Culture Moves through the World Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
  147. Vološinov VN. 1971. Reported speech. Readings in Russian Poetics: Formalist and Structuralist Views L Matejka, K Pomorska 149–75 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  148. Weidman A. 2010. Sound and the city: mimicry and media in South India. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 20:294–313 [Google Scholar]
  149. Wennerstrom AK. 2001. The Music of Everyday Speech: Prosody and Discourse Analysis New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  150. Whiten A, Ham R. 1992. On the nature and evolution of imitation in the animal kingdom: reappraisal of a century of research. Advances in the Study of Behaviour 21 PJB Slater, JS Rosenblatt, C Beer, M Milinski 239–83 New York: Academic [Google Scholar]
  151. Wood D, Wood H. 1996. Vygotsky, tutoring and learning. Oxford Rev. Educ. 22:5–16 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030008
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error