1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Plant Biology
  4. Volume 70, 2019
  5. Article

Annual Review of Plant Biology

Volume 70, 2019

The Genomics of Species Provides Insights into Rice Domestication and Heterosis

Abstract

Here, we review recent progress in genetic and genomic studies of the diversity of species. In recent years, unlocking the genetic diversity of species has provided insights into the genomics of rice domestication, heterosis, and complex traits. Genome sequencing and analysis of numerous wild rice () and Asian cultivated rice () accessions have enabled the identification of genome-wide signatures of rice domestication and the unlocking of the origin of Asian cultivated rice. Moreover, similar studies on genome variations of African rice () cultivars and their closely related wild progenitor accessions have provided strong evidence to support a theory of independent domestication in African rice. Integrated genomic approaches have efficiently investigated many heterotic loci in hybrid rice underlying yield heterosis advantages and revealed the genomic architecture of rice heterosis. We conclude that in-depth unlocking of genetic variations among species will further enhance rice breeding.

Keyword(s): complex traits, domestication, genome sequencing, genotyping, heterosis, hybrid vigor, Oryza, plant fitness, rice breeding
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100320
2019-04-29
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/arplant/70/1/annurev-arplant-050718-100320.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100320&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. 1.  Ammiraju JS, Lu F, Sanyal A, Yu Y, Song X et al. 2008. Dynamic evolution of Oryza genomes is revealed by comparative genomic analysis of a genus-wide vertical data set. Plant Cell 20:3191–209
     [Google Scholar]
  2. 2.  Arora L, Narula A 2017. Gene editing and crop improvement using CRISPR-Cas9 system. Front. Plant Sci. 8:1932
     [Google Scholar]
  3. 3.  Belhaj K, Chaparro-Garcia A, Kamoun S, Nekrasov V 2013. Plant genome editing made easy: targeted mutagenesis in model and crop plants using the CRISPR/Cas system. Plant Methods 9:39
     [Google Scholar]
  4. 4.  Bessho-Uehara K, Wang DR, Furuta T, Minami A, Nagai K et al. 2016. Loss of function at RAE2, a previously unidentified EPFL, is required for awnlessness in cultivated Asian rice. PNAS 113:8969–74
     [Google Scholar]
  5. 5.  Birchler JA 2017. Editing the phenotype: a revolution for quantitative genetics. Cell 171:269–70
     [Google Scholar]
  6. 6.  Borel B 2017. CRISPR, microbes and more are joining the war against crop killers. Nature 543:302–4
     [Google Scholar]
  7. 7.  Caicedo AL, Williamson SH, Hernandez RD, Boyko A, Fledel-Alon A et al. 2007. Genome-wide patterns of nucleotide polymorphism in domesticated rice. PLOS Genet 3:1745–56
     [Google Scholar]
  8. 8.  Cermak T, Curtin SJ, Gil-Humanes J, Cegan R, Kono TJY et al. 2017. A multipurpose toolkit to enable advanced genome engineering in plants. Plant Cell 29:1196–217
     [Google Scholar]
  9. 9.  Chen J, Huang Q, Gao D, Wang J, Lang Y et al. 2013. Whole-genome sequencing of Oryza brachyantha reveals mechanisms underlying Oryza genome evolution. Nat. Commun. 4:1595
     [Google Scholar]
  10. 10.  Chen W, Gao Y, Xie W, Gong L, Lu K et al. 2014. Genome-wide association analyses provide genetic and biochemical insights into natural variation in rice metabolism. Nat. Genet. 46:714–21
     [Google Scholar]
  11. 11.  Chen W, Wang W, Peng M, Gong L, Gao Y et al. 2016. Comparative and parallel genome-wide association studies for metabolic and agronomic traits in cereals. Nat. Commun. 7:12767
     [Google Scholar]
  12. 12.  Cheng KS, Oka HI 1986. Classification of rice cultivars into Hsien and Keng types. Jpn. J. Breed. 36:Ext. 214–15
     [Google Scholar]
  13. 13.  Cheng SH, Zhuang JY, Fan YY, Du JH, Cao LY 2007. Progress in research and development on hybrid rice: a super-domesticate in China. Ann. Bot. 100:959–66
     [Google Scholar]
  14. 14.  Choi JY, Platts AE, Fuller DQ, Hsing YI, Wing RA, Purugganan MD 2017. The rice paradox: multiple origins but single domestication in Asian rice. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34:969–79
     [Google Scholar]
  15. 15.  da Silva FG, Shen Y, Dardick C, Burdman S, Yadav RC et al. 2004. Bacterial genes involved in type I secretion and sulfation are required to elicit the rice Xa21-mediated innate immune response. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 17:593–601
     [Google Scholar]
  16. 16.  Deng Y, Zhai K, Xie Z, Yang D, Zhu X et al. 2017. Epigenetic regulation of antagonistic receptors confers rice blast resistance with yield balance. Science 355:962–65
     [Google Scholar]
  17. 17.  Ding J, Lu Q, Ouyang Y, Mao H, Zhang P et al. 2012. A long noncoding RNA regulates photoperiod-sensitive male sterility, an essential component of hybrid rice. PNAS 109:2654–59
     [Google Scholar]
  18. 18.  Ding Y 1949. [The origin of rice cultivation in China]. Agron. Bull. Nat. Zhong Shang Univ. 7:1–18 (In Chinese)
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 19.  Doebley JF 2004. The genetics of maize evolution. Annu. Rev. Genet. 38:37–59
     [Google Scholar]
  20. 20.  Doebley JF, Gaut BS, Smith BD 2006. The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell 127:1309–21
     [Google Scholar]
  21. 21.  Doebley JF, Stec A, Hubbard L 1997. The evolution of apical dominance in maize. Nature 386:485–88Characterizes tb1 as a major contributor in increasing apical dominance in maize when compared with its probable wild ancestor teosinte, suggesting that gene regulatory changes underlie the evolutionary divergence.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. 22.  Ellstrand NC, Heredia SM, Leak-Garcia JA, Heraty JM, Burger JC et al. 2010. Crops gone wild: evolution of weeds and invasives from domesticated ancestors. Evol. Appl. 3:494–504
     [Google Scholar]
  23. 23.  Filler Hayut S, Melamed Bessudo C, Levy AA 2017. Targeted recombination between homologous chromosomes for precise breeding in tomato. Nat. Commun. 8:15605
     [Google Scholar]
  24. 24. Food Agric. Organ. U.N. (FAO). 2009. Proceedings of the Expert Meeting on How to Feed the World in 2050 Rome: FAO
  25. 25.  Fournier-Level A, Perry EO, Wang JA, Braun PT, Migneault A et al. 2016. Predicting the evolutionary dynamics of seasonal adaptation to novel climates in Arabidopsis thaliana. PNAS 113:2812–21
     [Google Scholar]
  26. 26.  Fujita D, Trijatmiko KR, Tagle AG, Sapasap MV, Koide Y et al. 2013. NAL1 allele from a rice landrace greatly increases yield in modern indica cultivars. PNAS 110:20431–36
     [Google Scholar]
  27. 27.  Fuller DQ 2007. Contrasting patterns in crop domestication and domestication rates: recent archae-obotanical insights from the Old World. Ann. Bot. 100:903–24
     [Google Scholar]
  28. 28.  Gamuyao R, Chin JH, Pariasca-Tanaka J, Pesaresi P, Catausan S et al. 2012. The protein kinase Pstol1 from traditional rice confers tolerance of phosphorus deficiency. Nature 488:535–39
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 29.  Gao ZY, Zeng D, Cui X, Zhou Y, Yan M et al. 2003. Map-based cloning of the ALK gene, which controls the gelatinization temperature of rice. Sci. China C Life Sci. 46:661–68
     [Google Scholar]
  30. 30.  Gao ZY, Zhao SC, He WM, Guo LB, Peng YL et al. 2013. Dissecting yield-associated loci in super hybrid rice by resequencing recombinant inbred lines and improving parental genome sequences. PNAS 110:14492–97
     [Google Scholar]
  31. 31.  Ge S, Sang T, Lu BR, Hong DY 1999. Phylogeny of rice genomes with emphasis on origins of allotetraploid species. PNAS 96:14400–5Shows that the evolutionary relationships among rice species are inferred from Adh1, Adh2, and matK, especially for origins of allotetraploid species.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. 32.  Glaszmann JC 1987. Isozymes and classification of Asian rice varieties. Theor. Appl. Genet. 74:21–30
     [Google Scholar]
  33. 33.  Gnan S, Priest A, Kover PX 2014. The genetic basis of natural variation in seed size and seed number and their trade-off using Arabidopsis thaliana MAGIC lines. Genetics 198:1751–58
     [Google Scholar]
  34. 34.  Godfray HCJ, Beddington JR, Crute IR, Haddad L, Lawrence D et al. 2010. Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327:812–18
     [Google Scholar]
  35. 35.  Gong J, Miao J, Zhao Y, Zhao Q, Feng Q et al. 2017. Dissecting the genetic basis of grain shape and chalkiness traits in hybrid rice using multiple collaborative populations. Mol. Plant 10:1353–56
     [Google Scholar]
  36. 36.  Gross BL, Olsen KM 2010. Genetic perspectives on crop domestication. Trends Plant Sci 15:529–37
     [Google Scholar]
  37. 37.  Gross BL, Reagon M, Hsu SC, Caicedo AL, Jia Y, Olsen KM 2010. Seeing red: the origin of grain pigmentation in US weedy rice. Mol. Ecol. 19:3380–93
     [Google Scholar]
  38. 38.  Gross BL, Steffen FT, Olsen KM 2010. The molecular basis of white pericarps in African domesticated rice: novel mutations at the Rc gene. J. Evol. Biol. 23:2747–53
     [Google Scholar]
  39. 39.  Gu B, Zhou T, Luo J, Liu H, Wang Y et al. 2015. An-2 encodes a cytokinin synthesis enzyme that regulates awn length and grain production in rice. Mol. Plant 8:1635–50
     [Google Scholar]
  40. 40.  Guo J, Xu C, Wu D, Zhao Y, Qiu Y et al. 2018. Bph6 encodes an exocyst-localized protein and confers broad resistance to planthoppers in rice. Nat. Genet. 50:297–306
     [Google Scholar]
  41. 41.  Guo YL, Ge S 2005. Molecular phylogeny of Oryzeae (Poaceae) based on DNA sequences from chloroplast, mitochondrial, and nuclear genomes. Am. J. Bot. 92:1548–58
     [Google Scholar]
  42. 42.  Han B, Huang X 2013. Sequencing-based genome-wide association study in rice. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 16:133–38
     [Google Scholar]
  43. 43.  Hancock JF 2005. Contributions of domesticated plant studies to our understanding of plant evolution. Ann. Bot. 96:953–63
     [Google Scholar]
  44. 44.  Hattori Y, Nagai K, Furukawa S, Song XJ, Kawano R et al. 2009. The ethylene response factors SNORKEL1 and SNORKEL2 allow rice to adapt to deep water. Nature 460:1026–30
     [Google Scholar]
  45. 45.  Hollick JB, Chandler VL 1998. Epigenetic allelic states of a maize transcriptional regulatory locus exhibit overdominant gene action. Genetics 150:891–97
     [Google Scholar]
  46. 46.  Hu B, Wang W, Ou S, Tang J, Li H et al. 2015. Variation in NRT1.1B contributes to nitrate-use divergence between rice subspecies. Nat. Genet. 47:834–38
     [Google Scholar]
  47. 47.  Hu M, Lv S, Wu W, Fu Y, Liu F et al. 2018. The domestication of plant architecture in African rice. Plant J 94:661–69
     [Google Scholar]
  48. 48.  Hu YY, Mao BG, Peng Y, Sun YD, Pan YL et al. 2014. Deep re-sequencing of a widely used maintainer line of hybrid rice for discovery of DNA polymorphisms and evaluation of genetic diversity. Mol. Genet. Genom. 289:303–15
     [Google Scholar]
  49. 49.  Hua L, Wang DR, Tan L, Fu Y, Liu F et al. 2015. LABA1, a domestication gene associated with long, barbed awns in wild rice. Plant Cell 27:1875–88
     [Google Scholar]
  50. 50.  Hua JP, Xing YZ, Xu CG, Sun XL, Yu SB, Zhang Q 2002. Genetic dissection of an elite rice hybrid revealed that heterozygotes are not always advantageous for performance. Genetics 162:1885–95
     [Google Scholar]
  51. 51.  Huang X, Han B 2015. Rice domestication occurred through single origin and multiple introgressions. Nat. Plants 2:15207
     [Google Scholar]
  52. 52.  Huang X, Kurata N, Wei X, Wang ZX, Wang A et al. 2012. A map of rice genome variation reveals the origin of cultivated rice. Nature 490:497–501Uncovers the origin of Asian domesticated rice based on a gene variation map.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. 53.  Huang X, Qian Q, Liu Z, Sun H, He S et al. 2009. Natural variation at the DEP1 locus enhances grain yield in rice. Nat. Genet. 41:494–97
     [Google Scholar]
  54. 54.  Huang X, Wei X, Sang T, Zhao Q, Feng Q et al. 2010. Genome-wide association studies of 14 agronomic traits in rice landraces. Nat. Genet. 42:961–67Constructs the first rice haplotype map (HapMap) used for genome-wide association studies in rice.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. 55.  Huang X, Yang S, Gong J, Zhao Y, Feng Q et al. 2015. Genomic analysis of hybrid rice varieties reveals numerous superior alleles that contribute to heterosis. Nat. Commun. 6:6258
     [Google Scholar]
  56. 56.  Huang X, Yang S, Gong J, Zhao Q, Feng Q et al. 2016. Genomic architecture of heterosis for yield traits in rice. Nature 537:629–33Provides insights into the genomic architecture of heterosis by using different hybrid breeding systems.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. 57.  Huang X, Zhao Q, Han B 2015. Comparative population genomics reveals strong divergence and infrequent introgression between Asian and African rice. Mol. Plant 8:958–60
     [Google Scholar]
  58. 58.  Huang X, Zhao Y, Wei X, Li C, Wang A et al. 2011. Genome-wide association study of flowering time and grain yield traits in a worldwide collection of rice germplasm. Nat. Genet. 44:32–39
     [Google Scholar]
  59. 59.  Hufford MB, Xu X, van Heerwaarden J, Pyhajarvi T, Chia JM et al. 2012. Comparative population genomics of maize domestication and improvement. Nat. Genet. 44:808–11
     [Google Scholar]
  60. 60. Int. Rice Genome Seq. Proj., Sasaki T. 2005. The map-based sequence of the rice genome. Nature 436:793–800
     [Google Scholar]
  61. 61.  Ishii T, Numaguchi K, Miura K, Yoshida K, Thanh PT et al. 2013. OsLG1 regulates a closed panicle trait in domesticated rice. Nat. Genet. 45:462–65
     [Google Scholar]
  62. 62.  Ishimaru K, Hirotsu N, Madoka Y, Murakami N, Hara N et al. 2013. Loss of function of the IAA-glucose hydrolase gene TGW6 enhances rice grain weight and increases yield. Nat. Genet. 45:707–11
     [Google Scholar]
  63. 63.  Jiang Z, Xia H, Basso B, Lu BR 2012. Introgression from cultivated rice influences genetic differentiation of weedy rice populations at a local spatial scale. Theor. Appl. Genet. 124:309–22
     [Google Scholar]
  64. 64.  Jiao Y, Wang Y, Xue D, Wang J, Yan M et al. 2010. Regulation of OsSPL14 by OsmiR156 defines ideal plant architecture in rice. Nat. Genet. 42:541–44
     [Google Scholar]
  65. 65.  Jin J, Hua L, Zhu Z, Tan L, Zhao X et al. 2016. GAD1 Encodes a secreted peptide that regulates grain number, grain length, and awn development in rice domestication. Plant Cell 28:2453–63
     [Google Scholar]
  66. 66.  Jin J, Huang W, Gao JP, Yang J, Shi M et al. 2008. Genetic control of rice plant architecture under domestication. Nat. Genet. 40:1365–69
     [Google Scholar]
  67. 67.  Kane NC, Rieseberg LH 2008. Genetics and evolution of weedy Helianthus annuus populations: adaptation of an agricultural weed. Mol. Ecol. 17:384–94
     [Google Scholar]
  68. 68.  Kang BC, Yun JY, Kim ST, Shin Y, Ryu J et al. 2018. Precision genome engineering through adenine base editing in plants. Nat. Plants 4:7427–31 Erratum. 2018 Nat. Plants 4:9730
     [Google Scholar]
  69. 69.  Kato S 1930. On the affinity of the cultivated varieties of rice plants, Oryza sativa L. J. Dep. Agric. Kyushu Imp. Univ. 2:241–76
     [Google Scholar]
  70. 70.  Khush GS 1997. Origin, dispersal, cultivation and variation of rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 35:25–34
     [Google Scholar]
  71. 71.  Kim H, Jung J, Singh N, Greenberg A, Doyle JJ et al. 2016. Population dynamics among six major groups of the Oryza rufipogon species complex, wild relative of cultivated Asian rice. Rice 9:56
     [Google Scholar]
  72. 72.  Kim SL, Lee S, Kim HJ, Nam HG, An G 2007. OsMADS51 is a short-day flowering promoter that functions upstream of Ehd1, OsMADS14, and Hd3a. Plant Physiol 145:1484–94
     [Google Scholar]
  73. 73.  Klee HJ 2017. Genetic control of floral architecture: insights into improving crop yield. Cell 169:983–84
     [Google Scholar]
  74. 74.  Kojima S, Takahashi Y, Kobayashi Y, Monna L, Sasaki T et al. 2002. Hd3a, a rice ortholog of the Arabidopsis FT gene, promotes transition to flowering downstream of Hd1 under short-day conditions. Plant Cell Physiol 43:1096–105
     [Google Scholar]
  75. 75.  Komatsu M, Maekawa M, Shimamoto K, Kyozuka J 2001. The LAX1 and FRIZZY PANICLE 2 genes determine the inflorescence architecture of rice by controlling rachis-branch and spikelet development. Dev. Biol. 231:364–73
     [Google Scholar]
  76. 76.  Konishi S, Izawa T, Lin SY, Ebana K, Fukuta Y et al. 2006. An SNP caused loss of seed shattering during rice domestication. Science 312:1392–96
     [Google Scholar]
  77. 77.  Kover PX, Valdar W, Trakalo J, Scarcelli N, Ehrenreich IM et al. 2009. a multiparent advanced generation inter-cross to fine-map quantitative traits in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLOS Genet 5:e1000551
     [Google Scholar]
  78. 78.  Krieger U, Lippman ZB, Zamir D 2010. The flowering gene SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS drives heterosis for yield in tomato. Nat. Genet. 42:459–63
     [Google Scholar]
  79. 79.  Kubo T, Yoshimura A 2005. Epistasis underlying female sterility detected in hybrid breakdown in a Japonica–Indica cross of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 110:346–55
     [Google Scholar]
  80. 80.  Kuroha T, Nagai K, Gamuyao R, Wang DR, Furuta T et al. 2018. Ethylene-gibberellin signaling underlies adaptation of rice to periodic flooding. Science 361:181–86
     [Google Scholar]
  81. 81.  Larson G, Piperno DR, Allaby RG, Purugganan MD, Andersson L et al. 2014. Current perspectives and the future of domestication studies. PNAS 111:6139–46
     [Google Scholar]
  82. 82.  Li C, Sun B, Li Y, Liu C, Wu X et al. 2016. Numerous genetic loci identified for drought tolerance in the maize nested association mapping populations. BMC Genom 17:894
     [Google Scholar]
  83. 83.  Li C, Zhou A, Sang T 2006. Rice domestication by reducing shattering. Science 311:1936–39
     [Google Scholar]
  84. 84.  Li LF, Li YL, Jia Y, Caicedo AL, Olsen KM 2017. Signatures of adaptation in the weedy rice genome. Nat. Genet. 49:811–14Proposes a dedomestication model of weed rice in the coevolution of cultivated and wild rice.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. 85.  Li X, Guo T, Mu Q, Li X, Yu J 2018. Genomic and environmental determinants and their interplay underlying phenotypic plasticity. PNAS 115:6679–84Reveals that the genetic effect continuum across the environmental gradient and gene–gene interaction is contributing to phenotypic plasticity.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. 86.  Li X, Li X, Fridman E, Tesso TT, Yu J 2015. Dissecting repulsion linkage in the dwarfing gene Dw3 region for sorghum plant height provides insights into heterosis. PNAS 112:11823–28
     [Google Scholar]
  87. 87.  Li XM, Chao DY, Wu Y, Huang X, Chen K et al. 2015. Natural alleles of a proteasome α2 subunit gene contribute to thermotolerance and adaptation of African rice. Nat. Genet. 47:827–33
     [Google Scholar]
  88. 88.  Li Y, Fan C, Xing Y, Jiang Y, Luo L et al. 2011. Natural variation in GS5 plays an important role in regulating grain size and yield in rice. Nat. Genet. 43:1266–69
     [Google Scholar]
  89. 89.  Li Y, Fan C, Xing Y, Yun P, Luo L et al. 2014. Chalk5 encodes a vacuolar H+-translocating pyrophosphatase influencing grain chalkiness in rice. Nat. Genet. 46:398–404
     [Google Scholar]
  90. 90.  Liang G, Zhang H, Lou D, Yu D 2016. Selection of highly efficient sgRNAs for CRISPR/Cas9-based plant genome editing. Sci. Rep. 6:21451
     [Google Scholar]
  91. 91.  Linares OF 2002. African rice (Oryza glaberrima): history and future potential. PNAS 99:16360–65
     [Google Scholar]
  92. 92.  Liu J, Chen J, Zheng X, Wu F, Lin Q et al. 2017. GW5 acts in the brassinosteroid signalling pathway to regulate grain width and weight in rice. Nat. Plants 3:17043
     [Google Scholar]
  93. 93.  Londo JP, Schaal BA 2007. Origins and population genetics of weedy red rice in the USA. Mol. Ecol. 16:4523–35
     [Google Scholar]
  94. 94.  Long Y, Zhao L, Niu B, Su J, Wu H et al. 2008. Hybrid male sterility in rice controlled by interaction between divergent alleles of two adjacent genes. PNAS 105:18871–76
     [Google Scholar]
  95. 95.  Lu BR, Yang X, Ellstrand NC 2016. Fitness correlates of crop transgene flow into weedy populations: a case study of weedy rice in China and other examples. Evol. Appl. 9:857–70
     [Google Scholar]
  96. 96.  Luo D, Xu H, Liu Z, Guo J, Li H et al. 2013. A detrimental mitochondrial-nuclear interaction causes cytoplasmic male sterility in rice. Nat. Genet. 45:573–77
     [Google Scholar]
  97. 97.  Luo J, Liu H, Zhou T, Gu B, Huang X et al. 2013. An-1 encodes a basic helix-loop-helix protein that regulates awn development, grain size, and grain number in rice. Plant Cell 25:3360–76
     [Google Scholar]
  98. 98.  Lv S, Wu W, Wang M, Meyer RS, Ndjiondjop MN et al. 2018. Genetic control of seed shattering during African rice domestication. Nat. Plants 4:331–37
     [Google Scholar]
  99. 99.  Merotto A Jr, Goulart IC, Nunes AL, Kalsing A, Markus C et al. 2016. Evolutionary and social consequences of introgression of nontransgenic herbicide resistance from rice to weedy rice in Brazil. Evol. Appl. 9:837–46
     [Google Scholar]
  100. 100.  Meyer RS, Choi JY, Sanches M, Plessis A, Flowers JM et al. 2016. Domestication history and geographical adaptation inferred from a SNP map of African rice. Nat. Genet. 48:1083–88Indicates a protracted period of population size reduction in the predomestication phase and adaptive geographical divergence for salt tolerance of African rice.
     [Google Scholar]
  101. 101.  Meyer RS, Purugganan MD 2013. Evolution of crop species: genetics of domestication and diversification. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14:840–52
     [Google Scholar]
  102. 102.  Miki D, Zhang W, Zeng W, Feng Z, Zhu JK 2018. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene targeting in Arabidopsis using sequential transformation. Nat. Commun. 9:1967
     [Google Scholar]
  103. 103.  Miura K, Ikeda M, Matsubara A, Song XJ, Ito M et al. 2010. OsSPL14 promotes panicle branching and higher grain productivity in rice. Nat. Genet. 42:545–49
     [Google Scholar]
  104. 104.  Park CJ, Ronald PC 2012. Cleavage and nuclear localization of the rice XA21 immune receptor. Nat. Commun. 3:920
     [Google Scholar]
  105. 105.  Purugganan MD 2014. An evolutionary genomic tale of two rice species. Nat. Genet. 46:931–32
     [Google Scholar]
  106. 106.  Qian Q, Guo LB, Smith SM, Li JY 2016. Breeding high-yield superior quality hybrid super rice by rational design. Natl. Sci. Rev. 3:283–94
     [Google Scholar]
  107. 107.  Qiu J, Zhou Y, Mao L, Ye C, Wang W et al. 2017. Genomic variation associated with local adaptation of weedy rice during de-domestication. Nat. Commun. 8:15323
     [Google Scholar]
  108. 108.  Riedelsheimer C, Czedik-Eysenberg A, Grieder C, Lisec J, Technow F et al. 2012. Genomic and metabolic prediction of complex heterotic traits in hybrid maize. Nat. Genet. 44:217–20
     [Google Scholar]
  109. 109.  Rodriguez-Leal D, Lemmon ZH, Man J, Bartlett ME, Lippman ZB 2017. Engineering quantitative trait variation for crop improvement by genome editing. Cell 171:470–80.e8Provides foundation for unraveling complex relationships between gene-regulatory changes and control of quantitative traits by genome editing.
     [Google Scholar]
  110. 110.  Ross-Ibarra J, Morrell PL, Gaut BS 2007. Plant domestication, a unique opportunity to identify the genetic basis of adaptation. PNAS 104:Suppl. 18641–48
     [Google Scholar]
  111. 111.  Sang T, Ge S 2007. Genetics and phylogenetics of rice domestication. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 17:533–38
     [Google Scholar]
  112. 112.  Sasaki A, Ashikari M, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Itoh H, Nishimura A et al. 2002. Green revolution: a mutant gibberellin-synthesis gene in rice. Nature 416:701–2
     [Google Scholar]
  113. 113.  Second G 1985. Evolutionary relationships in the Sativa group of Oryza based on isozyme data. Genet. Sel. Evol. 17:89–114
     [Google Scholar]
  114. 114.  Shan Q, Wang Y, Li J, Zhang Y, Chen K et al. 2013. Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat. Biotechnol. 31:686–88
     [Google Scholar]
  115. 115.  Shimamoto K, Kyozuka J 2002. Rice as a model for comparative genomics of plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 53:399–419
     [Google Scholar]
  116. 116.  Shivrain VK, Burgos NR, Gealy DR, Sales MA, Smith KL 2009. Gene flow from weedy red rice (Oryza sativa L.) to cultivated rice and fitness of hybrids. Pest Manag. Sci. 65:1124–29
     [Google Scholar]
  117. 117.  Shomura A, Izawa T, Ebana K, Ebitani T, Kanegae H et al. 2008. Deletion in a gene associated with grain size increased yields during rice domestication. Nat. Genet. 40:1023–28
     [Google Scholar]
  118. 118.  Si L, Chen J, Huang X, Gong H, Luo J et al. 2016. OsSPL13 controls grain size in cultivated rice. Nat. Genet. 48:447–56
     [Google Scholar]
  119. 119.  Simons KJ, Fellers JP, Trick HN, Zhang Z, Tai YS et al. 2006. Molecular characterization of the major wheat domestication gene Q. Genetics 172:547–55
     [Google Scholar]
  120. 120.  Song XJ, Huang W, Shi M, Zhu MZ, Lin HX 2007. A QTL for rice grain width and weight encodes a previously unknown RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligase. Nat. Genet. 39:623–30
     [Google Scholar]
  121. 121.  Stein JC, Yu Y, Copetti D, Zwickl DJ, Zhang L et al. 2018. Genomes of 13 domesticated and wild rice relatives highlight genetic conservation, turnover and innovation across the genus Oryza. Nat. Genet 50:285–96
     [Google Scholar]
  122. 122.  Stich B 2009. Comparison of mating designs for establishing nested association mapping populations in maize and Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 183:1525–34
     [Google Scholar]
  123. 123.  Sun H, Qian Q, Wu K, Luo J, Wang S et al. 2014. Heterotrimeric G proteins regulate nitrogen-use efficiency in rice. Nat. Genet. 46:652–56
     [Google Scholar]
  124. 124.  Sun J, Qian Q, Ma DR, Xu ZJ, Liu D et al. 2013. Introgression and selection shaping the genome and adaptive loci of weedy rice in northern China. New Phytol 197:290–99
     [Google Scholar]
  125. 125.  Sweeney M, McCouch S 2007. The complex history of the domestication of rice. Ann. Bot. 100:951–57
     [Google Scholar]
  126. 126.  Tan L, Li X, Liu F, Sun X, Li C et al. 2008. Control of a key transition from prostrate to erect growth in rice domestication. Nat. Genet. 40:1360–64
     [Google Scholar]
  127. 127. The 3,000 Rice Genomes Proj. 2014. The 3,000 Rice Genomes Project. Gigascience 3:7
     [Google Scholar]
  128. 128.  Uga Y, Okuno K, Yano M 2011. Dro1, a major QTL involved in deep rooting of rice under upland field conditions. J. Exp. Bot. 62:2485–94
     [Google Scholar]
  129. 129.  Uga Y, Sugimoto K, Ogawa S, Rane J, Ishitani M et al. 2013. Control of root system architecture by DEEPER ROOTING 1 increases rice yield under drought conditions. Nat. Genet. 45:1097–102
     [Google Scholar]
  130. 130.  van Andel TR, Meyer RS, Aflitos SA, Carney JA, Veltman MA et al. 2016. Tracing ancestor rice of Suriname Maroons back to its African origin. Nat. Plants 2:16149
     [Google Scholar]
  131. 131.  Vigueira CC, Li W, Olsen KM 2013. The role of Bh4 in parallel evolution of hull colour in domesticated and weedy rice. J. Evol. Biol. 26:1738–49
     [Google Scholar]
  132. 132.  Wambugu PW, Brozynska M, Furtado A, Waters DL, Henry RJ 2015. Relationships of wild and domesticated rice (Oryza AA genome species) based upon whole chloroplast genome sequences. Sci. Rep. 5:13957
     [Google Scholar]
  133. 133.  Wambugu PW, Furtado A, Waters DL, Nyamongo DO, Henry RJ 2013. Conservation and utilization of African Oryza genetic resources. Rice 6:29
     [Google Scholar]
  134. 134.  Wang H, Nussbaum-Wagler T, Li B, Zhao Q, Vigouroux Y et al. 2005. The origin of the naked grains of maize. Nature 436:714–19
     [Google Scholar]
  135. 135.  Wang M, Yu Y, Haberer G, Marri PR, Fan C et al. 2014. The genome sequence of African rice (Oryza glaberrima) and evidence for independent domestication. Nat. Genet. 46:982–88Provides high-quality assembly and annotation of the O.glaberrima genome and reveals that O.glaberrima is domesticated in a single region.
     [Google Scholar]
  136. 136.  Wang S, Li S, Liu Q, Wu K, Zhang J et al. 2015. The OsSPL16-GW7 regulatory module determines grain shape and simultaneously improves rice yield and grain quality. Nat. Genet. 47:949–54
     [Google Scholar]
  137. 137.  Wang S, Wu K, Yuan Q, Liu X, Liu Z et al. 2012. Control of grain size, shape and quality by OsSPL16 in rice. Nat. Genet. 44:950–54
     [Google Scholar]
  138. 138.  Wang W, Mauleon R, Hu Z, Chebotarov D, Tai S et al. 2018. Genomic variation in 3,010 diverse accessions of Asian cultivated rice. Nature 557:43–49
     [Google Scholar]
  139. 139.  Wang Y, Xiong G, Hu J, Jiang L, Yu H et al. 2015. Copy number variation at the GL7 locus contributes to grain size diversity in rice. Nat. Genet. 47:944–48
     [Google Scholar]
  140. 140.  Wang Y, Xue Y, Li J 2005. Towards molecular breeding and improvement of rice in China. Trends Plant Sci 10:610–14
     [Google Scholar]
  141. 141.  Wang ZY, Zheng FQ, Shen GZ, Gao JP, Snustad DP et al. 1995. The amylose content in rice endosperm is related to the post-transcriptional regulation of the waxy gene. Plant J 7:613–22
     [Google Scholar]
  142. 142.  Weng J, Gu S, Wan X, Gao H, Guo T et al. 2008. Isolation and initial characterization of GW5, a major QTL associated with rice grain width and weight. Cell Res 18:1199–209
     [Google Scholar]
  143. 143.  Wing RA, Purugganan MD, Zhang Q 2018. The rice genome revolution: from an ancient grain to green super rice. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19:505–17
     [Google Scholar]
  144. 144.  Wright SI, Bi IV, Schroeder SG, Yamasaki M, Doebley JF et al. 2005. The effects of artificial selection on the maize genome. Science 308:1310–14
     [Google Scholar]
  145. 145.  Wright SI, Gaut BS 2005. Molecular population genetics and the search for adaptive evolution in plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:506–19
     [Google Scholar]
  146. 146.  Wu W, Liu X, Wang M, Meyer RS, Luo X et al. 2017. A single-nucleotide polymorphism causes smaller grain size and loss of seed shattering during African rice domestication. Nat. Plants 3:17064
     [Google Scholar]
  147. 147.  Xiao J, Li J, Yuan L, Tanksley SD 1995. Dominance is the major genetic basis of heterosis in rice as revealed by QTL analysis using molecular markers. Genetics 140:745–54
     [Google Scholar]
  148. 148.  Xu K, Xu X, Fukao T, Canlas P, Maghirang-Rodriguez R et al. 2006. Sub1A is an ethylene-response-factor-like gene that confers submergence tolerance to rice. Nature 442:705–8
     [Google Scholar]
  149. 149.  Xu X, Liu X, Ge S, Jensen JD, Hu F et al. 2011. Resequencing 50 accessions of cultivated and wild rice yields markers for identifying agronomically important genes. Nat. Biotechnol. 30:105–11
     [Google Scholar]
  150. 150.  Xue W, Xing Y, Weng X, Zhao Y, Tang W et al. 2008. Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice. Nat. Genet. 40:761–67
     [Google Scholar]
  151. 151.  Yamagata Y, Yamamoto E, Aya K, Win KT, Doi K et al. 2010. Mitochondrial gene in the nuclear genome induces reproductive barrier in rice. PNAS 107:1494–99
     [Google Scholar]
  152. 152.  Yan WH, Wang P, Chen HX, Zhou HJ, Li QP et al. 2011. A major QTL, Ghd8, plays pleiotropic roles in regulating grain productivity, plant height, and heading date in rice. Mol. Plant 4:319–30
     [Google Scholar]
  153. 153.  Yang J, Zhao X, Cheng K, Du H, Ouyang Y et al. 2012. A killer-protector system regulates both hybrid sterility and segregation distortion in rice. Science 337:1336–40
     [Google Scholar]
  154. 154.  Yang N, Wang R, Zhao Y 2017. Revolutionize genetic studies and crop improvement with high-throughput and genome-scale CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technology. Mol. Plant 10:1141–43
     [Google Scholar]
  155. 155.  Yang X, Xia H, Wang W, Wang F, Su J et al. 2011. Transgenes for insect resistance reduce herbivory and enhance fecundity in advanced generations of crop-weed hybrids of rice. Evol. Appl. 4:672–84
     [Google Scholar]
  156. 156.  Yano K, Yamamoto E, Aya K, Takeuchi H, Lo PC et al. 2016. Genome-wide association study using whole-genome sequencing rapidly identifies new genes influencing agronomic traits in rice. Nat. Genet. 48:927–34
     [Google Scholar]
  157. 157.  Yano M, Katayose Y, Ashikari M, Yamanouchi U, Monna L et al. 2000. Hd1, a major photoperiod sensitivity quantitative trait locus in rice, is closely related to the Arabidopsis flowering time gene CONSTANS. Plant Cell 12:2473–84
     [Google Scholar]
  158. 158.  Yu B, Lin Z, Li H, Li X, Li J et al. 2007. TAC1, a major quantitative trait locus controlling tiller angle in rice. Plant J 52:891–98
     [Google Scholar]
  159. 159.  Yu X, Zhao Z, Zheng X, Zhou J, Kong W et al. 2018. A selfish genetic element confers non-Mendelian inheritance in rice. Science 360:1130–32
     [Google Scholar]
  160. 160.  Zeng D, Tian Z, Rao Y, Dong G, Yang Y et al. 2017. Rational design of high-yield and superior-quality rice. Nat. Plants 3:17031
     [Google Scholar]
  161. 161.  Zhang J, Chen LL, Xing F, Kudrna DA, Yao W et al. 2016. Extensive sequence divergence between the reference genomes of two elite indica rice varieties Zhenshan 97 and Minghui 63. PNAS 113:5163–71
     [Google Scholar]
  162. 162.  Zhang L, Yu H, Ma B, Liu G, Wang J et al. 2017. A natural tandem array alleviates epigenetic repression of IPA1 and leads to superior yielding rice. Nat. Commun. 8:14789Indicates that different IPA traits are determined in a dosage-dependent manner and that fine-tuned expression of IPA1 could optimize plant architecture and improve rice yield.
     [Google Scholar]
  163. 163.  Zhang Q 2007. Strategies for developing Green Super Rice. PNAS 104:16402–9
     [Google Scholar]
  164. 164.  Zhang QJ, Zhu T, Xia EH, Shi C, Liu YL et al. 2014. Rapid diversification of five Oryza AA genomes associated with rice adaptation. PNAS 111:4954–62
     [Google Scholar]
  165. 165.  Zhang Y, Zhang S, Liu H, Fu B, Li L et al. 2015. Genome and comparative transcriptomics of African wild rice Oryza longistaminata provide insights into molecular mechanism of rhizomatousness and self-incompatibility. Mol. Plant 8:1683–86
     [Google Scholar]
  166. 166.  Zhao Q, Feng Q, Lu H, Li Y, Wang A et al. 2018. Pan-genome analysis highlights the extent of genomic variation in cultivated and wild rice. Nat. Genet. 50:278–84Constructs a pan-genome data set of the O. sativa–O.rufipogon species complex and identifies extent of the rice genome variations.
     [Google Scholar]
  167. 167.  Zhou G, Chen Y, Yao W, Zhang C, Xie W et al. 2012. Genetic composition of yield heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. PNAS 109:15847–52
     [Google Scholar]
  168. 168.  Zhou H, Zhou M, Yang Y, Li J, Zhu L et al. 2014. RNase ZS1 processes UbL40 mRNAs and controls thermosensitive genic male sterility in rice. Nat. Commun. 5:4884
     [Google Scholar]
  169. 169.  Zhu BF, Si L, Wang Z, Zhou Y, Zhu J et al. 2011. Genetic control of a transition from black to straw-white seed hull in rice domestication. Plant Physiol 155:1301–11
     [Google Scholar]
  170. 170.  Zou XH, Du YS, Tang L, Xu XW, Doyle JJ et al. 2015. Multiple origins of BBCC allopolyploid species in the rice genus (Oryza). Sci. Rep. 5:14876
     [Google Scholar]
  171. 171.  Zou XH, Yang Z, Doyle JJ, Ge S 2013. Multilocus estimation of divergence times and ancestral effective population sizes of Oryza species and implications for the rapid diversification of the genus. New Phytol 198:1155–64
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100320
Loading
The Genomics of Oryza Species Provides Insights into Rice Domestication and Heterosis
Annual Review of Plant Biology 70, 639 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100320
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100320
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100320
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error