DNA-Encoded Chemical Libraries: A Selection System Based on Endowing Organic Compounds with Amplifiable Information

Literature Cited

1. 1.  Erlanson DA, Fesik SW, Hubbard RE, Jahnke W, Jhoti H 2016. Twenty years on: the impact of fragments on drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 15:605–19
   [Google Scholar]
2. 2.  Folmer RH. 2016. Integrating biophysics with HTS-driven drug discovery projects. Drug Discov. Today 21:491–98
   [Google Scholar]
3. 3.  Nielsen TE, Schreiber SL 2008. Towards the optimal screening collection: a synthesis strategy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 47:48–56
   [Google Scholar]
4. 4.  Schreiber SL, Kotz JD, Li M, Aubé J, Austin CP et al. 2015. Advancing biological understanding and therapeutics discovery with small-molecule probes. Cell 161:1252–65
   [Google Scholar]
5. 5.  Arrowsmith CH, Audia JE, Austin C, Baell J, Bennett J et al. 2015. The promise and peril of chemical probes. Nat. Chem. Biol. 11:536–41
   [Google Scholar]
6. 6.  Dar AC, Shokat KM 2011. The evolution of protein kinase inhibitors from antagonists to agonists of cellular signaling. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 80:769–95
   [Google Scholar]
7. 7.  Köhler G, Milstein C 1975. Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. Nature 256:495–97
   [Google Scholar]
8. 8.  Wilchek M, Bayer EA, Livnah O 2006. Essentials of biorecognition: the (strept)avidin–biotin system as a model for protein–protein and protein–ligand interaction. Immunol. Lett. 103:27–32
   [Google Scholar]
9. 9.  Heinisch T, Ward TR 2016. Artificial metalloenzymes based on the biotin-streptavidin technology: challenges and opportunities. Acc. Chem. Res. 49:1711–21
   [Google Scholar]
10. 10.  Paganelli G, Pervez S, Siccardi AG, Rowlinson G, Deleide G et al. 1990. Intraperitoneal radio-localization of tumors pre-targeted by biotinylated monoclonal antibodies. Int. J. Cancer 45:1184–89
    [Google Scholar]
11. 11.  Sapsford KE, Algar WR, Berti L, Gemmill KB, Casey BJ et al. 2013. Functionalizing nanoparticles with biological molecules: developing chemistries that facilitate nanotechnology. Chem. Rev. 113:1904–2074
    [Google Scholar]
12. 12.  Halai R, Cooper MA 2012. Using label-free screening technology to improve efficiency in drug discovery. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 7:123–31
    [Google Scholar]
13. 13.  Goodnow RA Jr 2014. The changing feasibility and economics of chemical diversity exploration with DNA-encoded combinatorial approaches. A Handbook for DNA-Encoded Chemistry: Theory and Applications for Exploring Chemical Space and Drug Discovery, ed. RA Goodnow Jr 417–26 Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
14. 14.  Stark JL, Powers R 2012. Application of NMR and molecular docking in structure-based drug discovery. Top. Curr. Chem. 326:1–34
    [Google Scholar]
15. 15.  Smith GP. 1985. Filamentous fusion phage: novel expression vectors that display cloned antigens on the virion surface. Science 228:1315–17
    [Google Scholar]
16. 16.  Clackson T, Wells JA 1994. In vitro selection from protein and peptide libraries. Trends Biotechnol 12:173–84
    [Google Scholar]
17. 17.  McCafferty J, Griffiths AD, Winter G, Chiswell DJ 1990. Phage antibodies: filamentous phage displaying antibody variable domains. Nature 348:552–54
    [Google Scholar]
18. 18.  Huse WD, Sastry L, Iverson SA, Kang AS, Alting-Mees M et al. 1989. Generation of a large combinatorial library of the immunoglobulin repertoire in phage lambda. Science 246:1275–81
    [Google Scholar]
19. 19.  Marks JD, Hoogenboom HR, Bonnert TP, McCafferty J, Griffiths AD et al. 1991. By-passing immunization. Human antibodies from V-gene libraries displayed on phage. J. Mol. Biol. 222:581–97
    [Google Scholar]
20. 20.  Kang AS, Barbas CF, Janda KD, Benkovic SJ, Lerner RA 1991. Linkage of recognition and replication functions by assembling combinatorial antibody Fab libraries along phage surfaces. PNAS 88:4363–66
    [Google Scholar]
21. 21.  Winter G, Milstein C 1991. Man-made antibodies. Nature 349:293–99
    [Google Scholar]
22. 22.  Jespers LS, Roberts A, Mahler SM, Winter G, Hoogenboom HR 1994. Guiding the selection of human antibodies from phage display repertoires to a single epitope of an antigen. Biotechnology 12:899–903
    [Google Scholar]
23. 23.  Griffiths AD, Williams SC, Hartley O, Tomlinson IM, Waterhouse P et al. 1994. Isolation of high affinity human antibodies directly from large synthetic repertoires. EMBO J 13:3245–60
    [Google Scholar]
24. 24.  Gai SA, Wittrup KD 2007. Yeast surface display for protein engineering and characterization. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 17:467–73
    [Google Scholar]
25. 25.  Plückthun A. 2012. Ribosome display: a perspective. Methods Mol. Biol. 805:3–28
    [Google Scholar]
26. 26.  Brenner S, Lerner RA 1992. Encoded combinatorial chemistry. PNAS 89:5381–83Earliest proposal of using DNA tags to encode chemical libraries.
    [Google Scholar]
27. 27.  Needels MC, Jones DG, Tate EH, Heinkel GL, Kochersperger LM et al. 1993. Generation and screening of an oligonucleotide-encoded synthetic peptide library. PNAS 90:10700–4Demonstration that DNA-encoded peptides of known specificity to a cognate antibody can be retrieved from a mixture of compounds.
    [Google Scholar]
28. 28.  Nielsen J, Brenner S, Janda KD 1993. Synthetic methods for the implementation of encoded combinatorial chemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115:9812Demonstration that a set of peptides can be coupled to different oligonucleotides, which do not interfere with peptide binding to cognate antibodies; retrieval of encoded peptides upon binding to cognate antibodies; and application of the DNA-encoding methodology to dendrimeric structures.
    [Google Scholar]
29. 29.  Gartner ZJ, Tse BN, Grubina R, Doyon JB, Snyder TM et al. 2004. DNA-templated organic synthesis and selection of a library of macrocycles. Science 305:1601–5Earliest proposal and implementation of a DNA-templated chemical library.
    [Google Scholar]
30. 30.  Melkko S, Scheuermann J, Dumelin CE, Neri D 2004. Encoded self-assembling chemical libraries. Nat. Biotechnol. 22:568–74Earliest proposal and implementation of dual-pharmacophore DNA-encoded chemical libraries.
    [Google Scholar]
31. 31.  Halpin DR, Harbury PB 2004. DNA display I. Sequence-encoded routing of DNA populations. PLOS Biol 2:E173Earliest proposal of encoding by DNA routing.
    [Google Scholar]
32. 32.  Franzini RM, Neri D, Scheuermann J 2014. DNA-encoded chemical libraries: advancing beyond conventional small-molecule libraries. Acc. Chem. Res. 47:1247–55
    [Google Scholar]
33. 33.  Kleiner RE, Dumelin CE, Liu DR 2011. Small-molecule discovery from DNA-encoded chemical libraries. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40:5707–17
    [Google Scholar]
34. 34.  Zimmermann G, Neri D 2016. DNA-encoded chemical libraries: foundations and applications in lead discovery. Drug Discov. Today 21:1828–34
    [Google Scholar]
35. 35.  Franzini RM, Randolph C 2016. Chemical space of DNA-encoded libraries. J. Med. Chem. 59:6629–44
    [Google Scholar]
36. 36.  Clark MA. 2010. Selecting chemicals: the emerging utility of DNA-encoded libraries. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 14:396–403
    [Google Scholar]
37. 37.  Zambaldo C, Barluenga S, Winssinger N 2015. PNA-encoded chemical libraries. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 26:8–15
    [Google Scholar]
38. 38.  Shi B, Zhou Y, Huang Y, Zhang J, Li X 2017. Recent advances on the encoding and selection methods of DNA-encoded chemical library. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 27:361–69
    [Google Scholar]
39. 39.  Keefe AD, Clark MA, Hupp CD, Litovchick A, Zhang Y 2015. Chemical ligation methods for the tagging of DNA-encoded chemical libraries. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 26:80–88
    [Google Scholar]
40. 40.  Salamon H, Klika Škopić M, Jung K, Bugain O, Brunschweiger A 2016. Chemical biology probes from advanced DNA-encoded libraries. ACS Chem. Biol. 11:296–307
    [Google Scholar]
41. 41.  Goodnow RA Jr., Dumelin CE, Keefe AD. 2017. DNA-encoded chemistry: enabling the deeper sampling of chemical space. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 16:131–47
    [Google Scholar]
42. 42.  Blakskjaer P, Heitner T, Hansen NJ 2015. Fidelity by design: Yoctoreactor and binder trap enrichment for small-molecule DNA-encoded libraries and drug discovery. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 26:62–71
    [Google Scholar]
43. 43.  Clark MA, Acharya RA, Arico-Muendel CC, Belyanskaya SL, Benjamin DR 2009. Design, synthesis and selection of DNA-encoded small-molecule libraries. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5:647–54One of the earliest examples of the synthesis and successful screening of a very large DNA-encoded chemical library.
    [Google Scholar]
44. 44.  Buller F, Mannocci L, Zhang Y, Dumelin CE, Scheuermann J, Neri D 2008. Design and synthesis of a novel DNA-encoded chemical library using Diels-Alder cycloadditions. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18:5926–31
    [Google Scholar]
45. 45.  Buller F, Zhang Y, Scheuermann J, Schäfer J, Bühlmann P et al. 2009. Discovery of TNF inhibitors from a DNA-encoded chemical library based on Diels-Alder cycloaddition. Chem. Biol. 16:1075–86
    [Google Scholar]
46. 46.  Mannocci L, Zhang Y, Scheuermann J, Leimbacher M, De Bellis G et al. 2008. High-throughput sequencing allows the identification of binding molecules isolated from DNA-encoded chemical libraries. PNAS 105:17670–75Earliest publication of a DNA-recorded chemical library and the use of high-throughput DNA sequencing for library decoding.
    [Google Scholar]
47. 47.  Leimbacher M, Zhang Y, Mannocci L, Stravs M, Geppert T et al. 2012. Discovery of small-molecule interleukin-2 inhibitors from a DNA-encoded chemical library. Chemistry 18:7729–37
    [Google Scholar]
48. 48.  Buller F, Steiner M, Frey K, Mircsof D, Scheuermann J et al. 2011. Selection of carbonic anhydrase IX inhibitors from one million DNA-encoded compounds. ACS Chem. Biol. 6:336–44
    [Google Scholar]
49. 49.  Mannocci L, Melkko S, Buller F, Molnàr I, Bianké JP et al. 2010. Isolation of potent and specific trypsin inhibitors from a DNA-encoded chemical library. Bioconjug. Chem. 21:1836–41
    [Google Scholar]
50. 50.  Bain JD, Switzer C 1992. Regioselective ligation of oligoribonucleotides using DNA splints. Nucleic Acids Res 20:4372
    [Google Scholar]
51. 51.  Wichert M, Krall N, Decurtins W, Franzini RM, Pretto F et al. 2015. Dual-display of small molecules enables the discovery of ligand pairs and facilitates affinity maturation. Nat. Chem. 7:241–49Earliest publication of the use of high-throughput DNA sequencing for the decoding of dual-pharmacophore chemical libraries.
    [Google Scholar]
52. 52.  Kanan MW, Rozenman MM, Sakurai K, Snyder TM, Liu DR 2004. Reaction discovery enabled by DNA-templated synthesis and in vitro selection. Nature 431:545–49
    [Google Scholar]
53. 53.  Kleiner RE, Dumelin CE, Tiu GC, Sakurai K, Liu DR 2010. In vitro selection of a DNA-templated small-molecule library reveals a class of macrocyclic kinase inhibitors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132:11779–91
    [Google Scholar]
54. 54.  Li Y, Zhao P, Zhang M, Zhao X, Li X 2013. Multistep DNA-templated synthesis using a universal template. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135:17727–30
    [Google Scholar]
55. 55.  Hansen MH, Blakskjaer P, Petersen LK, Hansen TH, Højfeldt JW et al. 2009. A yoctoliter-scale DNA reactor for small-molecule evolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131:1322–27Earliest report on YoctoReactor encoding technology.
    [Google Scholar]
56. 56.  Halpin DR, Harbury PB 2004. DNA display II. Genetic manipulation of combinatorial chemistry libraries for small-molecule evolution. PLOS Biol 2:E174
    [Google Scholar]
57. 57.  Halpin DR, Lee JA, Wrenn SJ, Harbury PB 2004. DNA display III. Solid-phase organic synthesis on unprotected DNA. PLOS Biol 2:E175
    [Google Scholar]
58. 58.  Wrenn SJ, Weisinger RM, Halpin DR, Harbury PB 2007. Synthetic ligands discovered by in vitro selection. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129:13137–43
    [Google Scholar]
59. 59.  Neri D, Melkko S 2002. Encoded self-assembling chemical libraries Patent No. WO03/076943
60. 60.  Gorska K, Huang KT, Chaloin O, Winssinger N 2009. DNA-templated homo- and heterodimerization of peptide nucleic acid encoded oligosaccharides that mimick the carbohydrate epitope of HIV. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 48:7695–700
    [Google Scholar]
61. 61.  Dagauer JP, Zambaldo C, Ciobanu M, Morieux P, Barluenga S et al. 2015. DNA display of fragment pairs as a tool for the discovery of novel biologically active small molecules. Chem. Sci. 6:739–44
    [Google Scholar]
62. 62.  Dumelin CE, Trüssel S, Buller F, Trachsel E, Bootz F et al. 2008. A portable albumin binder from a DNA-encoded chemical library. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 47:3196–201
    [Google Scholar]
63. 63.  Decurtins W, Wichert M, Franzini RM, Buller F, Stravs MA et al. 2016. Automated screening for small organic ligands using DNA-encoded chemical libraries. Nat. Protoc. 11:764–80
    [Google Scholar]
64. 64.  Li Y, Zimmermann G, Scheuermann J, Neri D 2017. Quantitative PCR is a valuable tool to monitor the performance of DNA-encoded chemical library selections. ChemBioChem 18:848–52
    [Google Scholar]
65. 65.  Belyanskaya SL, Ding Y, Callahan JF, Lazaar AL, Israel DI 2017. Discovering drugs with DNA-encoded library technology: from concept to clinic with an inhibitor of soluble epoxide hydrolase. ChemBioChem 18:837–42
    [Google Scholar]
66. 66.  Bao J, Krylova SM, Cherney LT, Hale RL, Belyanskaya SL et al. 2015. Predicting electrophoretic mobility of protein-ligand complexes for ligands from DNA-encoded libraries of small molecules. Anal. Chem. 88:5498–506
    [Google Scholar]
67. 67.  McGregor LM, Gorin DJ, Dumelin CE, Liu DR 2010. Interaction-dependent PCR: identification of ligand-target pairs from libraries of ligands and libraries of targets in a single solution-phase experiment. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132:15522–24
    [Google Scholar]
68. 68.  McGregor LM, Jain T, Liu DR 2014. Identification of ligand-target pairs from combined libraries of small molecules and unpurified protein targets in cell lysates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136:3264–70
    [Google Scholar]
69. 69.  Denton KE, Krusemark CJ 2016. Crosslinking of DNA-linked ligands to target proteins for enrichment from DNA-encoded libraries. Med. Chem. Comm. 7:2020–27
    [Google Scholar]
70. 70.  Shi B, Deng Y, Zhao P, Li X 2017. Selecting a DNA-encoded chemical library against non-immobilized proteins using a “ligate-cross-link-purify” strategy. Bioconjug. Chem. 28:2293
    [Google Scholar]
71. 71.  Franzini RM, Ekblad T, Zhong N, Wichert M, Decurtins W et al. 2015. Identification of structure-activity relationships from screening a structurally compact DNA-encoded chemical library. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 54:3927–31
    [Google Scholar]
72. 72.  Buller F, Steiner M, Scheuermann J, Mannocci L, Nissen I et al. 2010. High-throughput sequencing for the identification of binding molecules from DNA-encoded chemical libraries. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20:4188–92
    [Google Scholar]
73. 73.  Satz AL, Cai J, Chen Y, Goodnow R, Gruber F et al. 2015. DNA compatible multistep synthesis and applications to DNA encoded libraries. Bioconjug. Chem. 26:1623–32
    [Google Scholar]
74. 74.  Li Y, Gabriele E, Samain F, Favalli N, Sladojevich F et al. 2016. Optimized reaction conditions for amide bond formation in DNA-encoded combinatorial libraries. ACS Comb. Sci. 18:438–43
    [Google Scholar]
75. 75.  Franzini RM, Biendl S, Mikutis G, Samain F, Scheuermann J et al. 2015. “Cap-and-catch” purification for enhancing the quality of libraries of DNA conjugates. ACS Comb. Sci. 17:393–98
    [Google Scholar]
76. 76.  Franzini RM, Nauer A, Scheuermann J, Neri D 2015. Interrogating target-specificity by parallel screening of a DNA-encoded chemical library against closely related proteins. Chem. Commun. 51:8014–16
    [Google Scholar]
77. 77.  Samain F, Ekblad T, Mikutis G, Zhong N, Zimmermann M et al. 2015. Tankyrase 1 inhibitors with drug-like properties identified by screening a DNA-encoded chemical library. J. Med. Chem. 58:5143–49
    [Google Scholar]
78. 78.  Melkko S, Zhang Y, Dumelin CE, Scheuermann J, Neri D 2007. Isolation of high-affinity trypsin inhibitors from a DNA-encoded chemical library. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 46:4671–74
    [Google Scholar]
79. 79.  Wu Z, Graybill TL, Zeng X, Platchek M, Zhang J et al. 2015. Cell-based selection expands the utility of DNA-encoded small-molecule library technology to cell surface drug targets: identification of novel antagonists of the NK3 tachykinin receptor. ACS Comb. Sci. 17:722–31
    [Google Scholar]
80. 80.  Ding Y, O'Keefe H, DeLorey JL, Israel DI, Messer JA et al. 2015. Discovery of potent and selective inhibitors for ADAMTS-4 through DNA-encoded library technology (ELT). ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 6:888–93
    [Google Scholar]
81. 81.  Yang H, Medeiros PF, Raha K, Elkins P, Lind KE et al. 2015. Discovery of a potent class of PI3Kα inhibitors with unique binding mode via encoded library technology (ELT). ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 6:531–36
    [Google Scholar]
82. 82.  Malone ML, Paegel BM 2016. What is a “DNA-compatible” reaction?. ACS Comb. Sci. 18:182–87
    [Google Scholar]
83. 83.  Harris PA, King BW, Bandyopadhyay D, Berger SB, Campobasso N et al. 2016. DNA-encoded library screening identifies benzo[b][1,4]oxazepin-4-ones as highly potent and monoselective receptor interacting protein 1 kinase inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 59:2163–78
    [Google Scholar]
84. 84.  Petersen LK, Blakskjaer P, Chaikuad A, Christensen AB, Dietvorst J et al. 2016. Novel p38α MAP kinase inhibitors identified from yoctoReactor DNA-encoded small molecule library. Med. Chem. Comm. 7:1332–39
    [Google Scholar]
85. 85.  Litovchick A, Dumelin CE, Habeshian S, Gikunju D, Gujé MA et al. 2015. Encoded library synthesis using chemical ligation and the discovery of sEH inhibitors from a 334-million member library. Sci. Rep. 5:10916
    [Google Scholar]
86. 86.  Maianti JP, McFedries A, Foda ZH, Kleiner RE, Du XQ et al. 2014. Anti-diabetic activity of insulin-degrading enzyme inhibitors mediated by multiple hormones. Nature 511:94–98
    [Google Scholar]
87. 87.  Seigal BA, Connors WH, Fraley A, Borzilleri RM, Carter PH et al. 2015. The discovery of macrocyclic XIAP antagonists from a DNA-programmed chemistry library, and their optimization to give lead compounds with in vivo antitumor activity. J. Med. Chem. 58:2855–61
    [Google Scholar]
88. 88.  Zambaldo C, Daguer JP, Saarbach J, Barluenga S, Winssinger N 2016. Screening for covalent inhibitors using DNA-display of small molecule libraries functionalized with cysteine reactive moieties. Med. Chem. Comm. 7:1340–51
    [Google Scholar]
89. 89.  Daguer JP, Zambaldo C, Abegg D, Barluenga S, Tallant C et al. 2015. Identification of covalent bromodomain binders through DNA display of small molecules. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 54:6057–61
    [Google Scholar]
90. 90.  Zimmermann G, Rieder U, Bajic D, Vanetti S, Chaikuad A et al. 2017. A specific and covalent JNK-1 ligand selected from an encoded self-assembling chemical library. Chemistry 23:8152–55
    [Google Scholar]
91. 91.  Cuozzo JW, Centrella PA, Gikunju D, Habeshian S, Hupp CD et al. 2017. Discovery of a potent BTK inhibitor with a novel binding mode by using parallel selections with a DNA-encoded chemical library. ChemBioChem 18:864–71
    [Google Scholar]
92. 92.  Chan AI, McGregor LM, Jain T, Liu DR 2017. Discovery of a covalent kinase inhibitor from a DNA-encoded small-molecule library x protein selection. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139:10192–95
    [Google Scholar]
93. 93.  Zimmermann G, Li Y, Rieder U, Mattarella M, Neri D et al. 2017. Hit-validation methodologies for ligands isolated from DNA-encoded chemical libraries. ChemBioChem 18:853–57
    [Google Scholar]
94. 94.  Machutta CA, Kollmann CS, Lind KE, Bai X, Chan PF et al. 2017. Prioritizing multiple therapeutic targets in parallel using automated DNA-encoded library screening. Nat. Commun. 8:16081
    [Google Scholar]
95. 95.  Satz AL, Hochstrasser R, Petersen AC 2017. Analysis of current DNA encoded chemical library screening data indicates higher false negative rates for numerically larger libraries. ACS Comb. Sci. 19:234
    [Google Scholar]
96. 96.  Li Y, De Luca R, Cazzamalli S, Pretto F, Bajic D et al.2018 Versatile protein recognition by the encoded display of multiple chemical elements on a constant macrocyclic scaffold. Nat. Chem 10:441–48
    [Google Scholar]
97. 97.  Thomas B, Lu X, Birmingham WR, Huang K, Both P et al. 2017. Applications of biocatalysis to on-DNA carbohydrate library synthesis. ChemBioChem 18:858
    [Google Scholar]