Chromatin and Metabolism

Literature Cited

1. 1.  Fuchs G. 2011. Alternative pathways of carbon dioxide fixation: insights into the early evolution of life?. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 65:631–58
   [Google Scholar]
2. 2.  DeBerardinis RJ, Thompson CB 2012. Cellular metabolism and disease: What do metabolic outliers teach us?. Cell 148:1132–44
   [Google Scholar]
3. 3.  López-Otín C, Galluzzi L, Freije JM, Madeo F, Kroemer G 2016. Metabolic control of longevity. Cell 166:802–21
   [Google Scholar]
4. 4.  Buttgereit F, Brand MD 1995. A hierarchy of ATP-consuming processes in mammalian cells. Biochem. J. 312:Pt. 1163–67
   [Google Scholar]
5. 5.  Li S, Swanson SK, Gogol M, Florens L, Washburn MP et al. 2015. Serine and SAM responsive complex SESAME regulates histone modification crosstalk by sensing cellular metabolism. Mol. Cell 60:408–21
   [Google Scholar]
6. 6.  McGhee JD, Felsenfeld G 1980. Nucleosome structure. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 49:1115–56
   [Google Scholar]
7. 7.  Kornberg RD, Lorch Y 1992. Chromatin structure and transcription. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 8:563–87
   [Google Scholar]
8. 8.  Luger K, Mader AW, Richmond RK, Sargent DF, Richmond TJ 1997. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature 389:251–60
   [Google Scholar]
9. 9.  Suganuma T, Workman JL 2011. Signals and combinatorial functions of histone modifications. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 80:473–99
   [Google Scholar]
10. 10.  Juan LJ, Utley RT, Adams CC, Vettese-Dadey M, Workman JL 1994. Differential repression of transcription factor binding by histone H1 is regulated by the core histone amino termini. EMBO J 13:6031–40
    [Google Scholar]
11. 11.  Vettese-Dadey M, Grant PA, Hebbes TR, Crane- Robinson C, Allis CD, Workman JL 1996. Acetylation of histone H4 plays a primary role in enhancing transcription factor binding to nucleosomal DNA in vitro. EMBO J 15:2508–18
    [Google Scholar]
12. 12.  Clapier CR, Cairns BR 2009. The biology of chromatin remodeling complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78:273–304
    [Google Scholar]
13. 13.  Swinstead EE, Paakinaho V, Presman DM, Hager GL 2016. Pioneer factors and ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factors interact dynamically. A new perspective: Multiple transcription factors can effect chromatin pioneer functions through dynamic interactions with ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factors. Bioessays 38:1150–57
    [Google Scholar]
14. 14.  Dutta A, Abmayr SM, Workman JL 2016. Diverse activities of histone acylations connect metabolism to chromatin function. Mol. Cell 63:547–52
    [Google Scholar]
15. 15.  Suganuma T, Workman JL 2008. Crosstalk among histone modifications. Cell 135:604–7
    [Google Scholar]
16. 16.  Kim JH, Saraf A, Florens L, Washburn M, Workman JL 2010. Gcn5 regulates the dissociation of SWI/SNF from chromatin by acetylation of Swi2/Snf2. Genes Dev 24:2766–71
    [Google Scholar]
17. 17.  Bennett RL, Licht JD 2018. Targeting epigenetics in cancer. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 58:187–207
    [Google Scholar]
18. 18.  Saxonov S, Berg P, Brutlag DL 2006. A genome-wide analysis of CpG dinucleotides in the human genome distinguishes two distinct classes of promoters. PNAS 103:1412–17
    [Google Scholar]
19. 19.  Merlo A, Herman JG, Mao L, Lee DJ, Gabrielson E et al. 1995. 5′ CpG island methylation is associated with transcriptional silencing of the tumour suppressor p16/CDKN2/MTS1 in human cancers. Nat. Med. 1:686–92
    [Google Scholar]
20. 20.  Smallwood A, Esteve PO, Pradhan S, Carey M 2007. Functional cooperation between HP1 and DNMT1 mediates gene silencing. Genes Dev 21:1169–78
    [Google Scholar]
21. 21.  Das C, Tyler JK, Churchill ME 2010. The histone shuffle: histone chaperones in an energetic dance. Trends Biochem. Sci. 35:476–89
    [Google Scholar]
22. 22.  Burgess RJ, Zhang Z 2013. Histone chaperones in nucleosome assembly and human disease. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20:14–22
    [Google Scholar]
23. 23.  Venkatesh S, Workman JL 2015. Histone exchange, chromatin structure and the regulation of transcription. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16:178–89
    [Google Scholar]
24. 24.  Lorch Y, Maier-Davis B, Kornberg RD 2006. Chromatin remodeling by nucleosome disassembly in vitro. PNAS 103:3090–93
    [Google Scholar]
25. 25.  Rhee HS, Pugh BF 2012. Genome-wide structure and organization of eukaryotic pre-initiation complexes. Nature 483:295–301
    [Google Scholar]
26. 26.  Yen K, Vinayachandran V, Pugh BF 2013. SWR-C and INO80 chromatin remodelers recognize nucleosome-free regions near +1 nucleosomes. Cell 154:1246–56
    [Google Scholar]
27. 27.  Urahama T, Harada A, Maehara K, Horikoshi N, Sato K et al. 2016. Histone H3.5 forms an unstable nucleosome and accumulates around transcription start sites in human testis. Epigenetics Chromatin 9:2
    [Google Scholar]
28. 28.  Mayes K, Qiu Z, Alhazmi A, Landry JW 2014. ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes as novel targets for cancer therapy. Adv. Cancer Res. 121:183–233
    [Google Scholar]
29. 29.  Locasale JW. 2013. Serine, glycine and one-carbon units: cancer metabolism in full circle. Nat. Rev. Cancer 13:572–83
    [Google Scholar]
30. 30.  Shuvalov O, Petukhov A, Daks A, Fedorova O, Vasileva E, Barlev NA 2017. One-carbon metabolism and nucleotide biosynthesis as attractive targets for anticancer therapy. Oncotarget 8:23955–77
    [Google Scholar]
31. 31.  Yang M, Vousden KH 2016. Serine and one-carbon metabolism in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 16:650–62
    [Google Scholar]
32. 32.  Maddocks OD, Berkers CR, Mason SM, Zheng L, Blyth K et al. 2013. Serine starvation induces stress and p53-dependent metabolic remodelling in cancer cells. Nature 493:542–46
    [Google Scholar]
33. 33.  Locasale JW, Grassian AR, Melman T, Lyssiotis CA, Mattaini KR et al. 2011. Phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase diverts glycolytic flux and contributes to oncogenesis. Nat. Genet. 43:869–74
    [Google Scholar]
34. 34.  Possemato R, Marks KM, Shaul YD, Pacold ME, Kim D et al. 2011. Functional genomics reveal that the serine synthesis pathway is essential in breast cancer. Nature 476:346–50
    [Google Scholar]
35. 35.  Chaneton B, Hillmann P, Zheng L, Martin AC, Maddocks OD et al. 2012. Serine is a natural ligand and allosteric activator of pyruvate kinase M2. Nature 491:458–62
    [Google Scholar]
36. 36.  Jain M, Nilsson R, Sharma S, Madhusudhan N, Kitami T et al. 2012. Metabolite profiling identifies a key role for glycine in rapid cancer cell proliferation. Science 336:1040–44
    [Google Scholar]
37. 37.  Labuschagne CF, van den Broek NJ, Mackay GM, Vousden KH, Maddocks OD 2014. Serine, but not glycine, supports one-carbon metabolism and proliferation of cancer cells. Cell Rep 7:1248–58
    [Google Scholar]
38. 38.  Maddocks OD, Labuschagne CF, Adams PD, Vousden KH 2016. Serine metabolism supports the methionine cycle and DNA/RNA methylation through de novo ATP synthesis in cancer cells. Mol. Cell 61:210–21
    [Google Scholar]
39. 39.  van der Knaap JA, Kumar BR, Moshkin YM, Langenberg K, Krijgsveld J et al. 2005. GMP synthetase stimulates histone H2B deubiquitylation by the epigenetic silencer USP7. Mol. Cell 17:695–707
    [Google Scholar]
40. 40.  Reddy BA, van der Knaap JA, Bot AG, Mohd-Sarip A, Dekkers DH et al. 2014. Nucleotide biosynthetic enzyme GMP synthase is a TRIM21-controlled relay of p53 stabilization. Mol. Cell 53:458–70
    [Google Scholar]
41. 41.  Kubbutat MH, Jones SN, Vousden KH 1997. Regulation of p53 stability by Mdm2. Nature 387:299–303
    [Google Scholar]
42. 42.  Keller KE, Doctor ZM, Dwyer ZW, Lee YS 2014. SAICAR induces protein kinase activity of PKM2 that is necessary for sustained proliferative signaling of cancer cells. Mol. Cell 53:700–9
    [Google Scholar]
43. 43.  Keller KE, Tan IS, Lee YS 2012. SAICAR stimulates pyruvate kinase isoform M2 and promotes cancer cell survival in glucose-limited conditions. Science 338:1069–72
    [Google Scholar]
44. 44.  Etchegaray JP, Mostoslavsky R 2016. Interplay between metabolism and epigenetics: a nuclear adaptation to environmental changes. Mol. Cell 62:695–711
    [Google Scholar]
45. 45.  van der Knaap JA, Verrijzer CP 2016. Undercover: gene control by metabolites and metabolic enzymes. Genes Dev 30:2345–69
    [Google Scholar]
46. 46.  Cai L, Sutter BM, Li B, Tu BP 2011. Acetyl-CoA induces cell growth and proliferation by promoting the acetylation of histones at growth genes. Mol. Cell 42:426–37
    [Google Scholar]
47. 47.  Suganuma T, Workman JL 2016. Histone modification as a reflection of metabolism. Cell Cycle 15:481–82
    [Google Scholar]
48. 48.  Shi L, Tu BP 2015. Acetyl-CoA and the regulation of metabolism: mechanisms and consequences. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 33:125–31
    [Google Scholar]
49. 49.  Sutendra G, Kinnaird A, Dromparis P, Paulin R, Stenson TH et al. 2014. A nuclear pyruvate dehydrogenase complex is important for the generation of acetyl-CoA and histone acetylation. Cell 158:84–97
    [Google Scholar]
50. 50.  Venkatesh S, Smolle M, Li H, Gogol MM, Saint M et al. 2012. Set2 methylation of histone H3 lysine 36 suppresses histone exchange on transcribed genes. Nature 489:452–55
    [Google Scholar]
51. 51.  Shyh-Chang N, Locasale JW, Lyssiotis CA, Zheng Y, Teo RY et al. 2013. Influence of threonine metabolism on S-adenosylmethionine and histone methylation. Science 339:222–26
    [Google Scholar]
52. 52.  Tehlivets O. 2011. Homocysteine as a risk factor for atherosclerosis: Is its conversion to S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine the key to deregulated lipid metabolism?. J. Lipids 2011:702853
    [Google Scholar]
53. 53.  Ye C, Sutter BM, Wang Y, Kuang Z, Tu BP 2017. A metabolic function for phospholipid and histone methylation. Mol. Cell 66:180–93.e8
    [Google Scholar]
54. 54.  Stipanuk MH, Ueki I 2011. Dealing with methionine/homocysteine sulfur: cysteine metabolism to taurine and inorganic sulfur. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 34:17–32
    [Google Scholar]
55. 55.  Han S, Schroeder EA, Silva-Garcia CG, Hebestreit K, Mair WB, Brunet A 2017. Mono-unsaturated fatty acids link H3K4me3 modifiers to C. elegans lifespan. Nature 544:185–90
    [Google Scholar]
56. 56.  Yang W, Xia Y, Hawke D, Li X, Liang J et al. 2012. PKM2 phosphorylates histone H3 and promotes gene transcription and tumorigenesis. Cell 150:685–96
    [Google Scholar]
57. 57.  Metzger E, Yin N, Wissmann M, Kunowska N, Fischer K et al. 2008. Phosphorylation of histone H3 at threonine 11 establishes a novel chromatin mark for transcriptional regulation. Nat. Cell Biol. 10:53–60
    [Google Scholar]
58. 58.  Boukouris AE, Zervopoulos SD, Michelakis ED 2016. Metabolic enzymes moonlighting in the nucleus: metabolic regulation of gene transcription. Trends Biochem. Sci. 41:712–30
    [Google Scholar]
59. 59.  Fjeld CC, Birdsong WT, Goodman RH 2003. Differential binding of NAD⁺ and NADH allows the transcriptional corepressor carboxyl-terminal binding protein to serve as a metabolic sensor. PNAS 100:9202–7
    [Google Scholar]
60. 60.  Chinnadurai G. 2002. CtBP, an unconventional transcriptional corepressor in development and oncogenesis. Mol. Cell 9:213–24
    [Google Scholar]
61. 61.  Rutter J, Reick M, Wu LC, McKnight SL 2001. Regulation of clock and NPAS2 DNA binding by the redox state of NAD cofactors. Science 293:510–14
    [Google Scholar]
62. 62.  Bonfiglio JJ, Fontana P, Zhang Q, Colby T, Gibbs-Seymour I et al. 2017. Serine ADP-ribosylation depends on HPF1. Mol. Cell 65:932–40.e6
    [Google Scholar]
63. 63.  Gibbs-Seymour I, Fontana P, Rack JGM, Ahel I 2016. HPF1/C4orf27 is a PARP-1-interacting protein that regulates PARP-1 ADP-ribosylation activity. Mol. Cell 62:432–42
    [Google Scholar]
64. 64.  Le May N, Iltis I, Ame JC, Zhovmer A, Biard D et al. 2012. Poly (ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase regulates retinoic acid receptor-mediated gene expression. Mol. Cell 48:785–98
    [Google Scholar]
65. 65.  Krishnakumar R, Kraus WL 2010. PARP-1 regulates chromatin structure and transcription through a KDM5B-dependent pathway. Mol. Cell 39:736–49
    [Google Scholar]
66. 66.  Bilan V, Leutert M, Nanni P, Panse C, Hottiger MO 2017. Combining higher-energy collision dissociation and electron-transfer/higher-energy collision dissociation fragmentation in a product-dependent manner confidently assigns proteomewide ADP-ribose acceptor sites. Anal. Chem. 89:1523–30
    [Google Scholar]
67. 67.  Leung AK. 2017. SERious surprises for ADP-ribosylation specificity: HPF1 switches PARP1 specificity to Ser residues. Mol. Cell 65:777–78
    [Google Scholar]
68. 68.  Moazed D. 2001. Enzymatic activities of Sir2 and chromatin silencing. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13:232–38
    [Google Scholar]
69. 69.  Dang W, Steffen KK, Perry R, Dorsey JA, Johnson FB et al. 2009. Histone H4 lysine 16 acetylation regulates cellular lifespan. Nature 459:802–7
    [Google Scholar]
70. 70.  Michishita E, McCord RA, Berber E, Kioi M, Padilla-Nash H et al. 2008. SIRT6 is a histone H3 lysine 9 deacetylase that modulates telomeric chromatin. Nature 452:492–96
    [Google Scholar]
71. 71.  Yang B, Zwaans BM, Eckersdorff M, Lombard DB 2009. The sirtuin SIRT6 deacetylates H3 K56Ac in vivo to promote genomic stability. Cell Cycle 8:2662–63
    [Google Scholar]
72. 72.  Zhong L, D'Urso A, Toiber D, Sebastian C, Henry RE et al. 2010. The histone deacetylase Sirt6 regulates glucose homeostasis via Hif1α. Cell 140:280–93
    [Google Scholar]
73. 73.  Jiang H, Khan S, Wang Y, Charron G, He B et al. 2013. SIRT6 regulates TNF-α secretion through hydrolysis of long-chain fatty acyl lysine. Nature 496:110–13
    [Google Scholar]
74. 74.  Feldman JL, Baeza J, Denu JM 2013. Activation of the protein deacetylase SIRT6 by long-chain fatty acids and widespread deacylation by mammalian sirtuins. J. Biol. Chem. 288:31350–56
    [Google Scholar]
75. 75.  Warner JR. 1999. The economics of ribosome biosynthesis in yeast. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24:437–40
    [Google Scholar]
76. 76.  Rolfe DF, Brown GC 1997. Cellular energy utilization and molecular origin of standard metabolic rate in mammals. Physiol. Rev. 77:731–58
    [Google Scholar]
77. 77.  Grummt I. 2013. The nucleolus-guardian of cellular homeostasis and genome integrity. Chromosoma 122:487–97
    [Google Scholar]
78. 78.  Torigoe SE, Patel A, Khuong MT, Bowman GD, Kadonaga JT 2013. ATP-dependent chromatin assembly is functionally distinct from chromatin remodeling. eLife 2:e00863
    [Google Scholar]
79. 79.  Gerhold CB, Gasser SM 2014. INO80 and SWR complexes: relating structure to function in chromatin remodeling. Trends Cell Biol 24:619–31
    [Google Scholar]
80. 80.  Tosi A, Haas C, Herzog F, Gilmozzi A, Berninghausen O et al. 2013. Structure and subunit topology of the INO80 chromatin remodeler and its nucleosome complex. Cell 154:1207–19
    [Google Scholar]
81. 81.  Nguyen VQ, Ranjan A, Stengel F, Wei D, Aebersold R et al. 2013. Molecular architecture of the ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling complex SWR1. Cell 154:1220–31
    [Google Scholar]
82. 82.  Papamichos-Chronakis M, Watanabe S, Rando OJ, Peterson CL 2011. Global regulation of H2A.Z localization by the INO80 chromatin-remodeling enzyme is essential for genome integrity. Cell 144:200–13
    [Google Scholar]
83. 83.  Li B, Pattenden SG, Lee D, Gutierrez J, Chen J et al. 2005. Preferential occupancy of histone variant H2AZ at inactive promoters influences local histone modifications and chromatin remodeling. PNAS 102:18385–90
    [Google Scholar]
84. 84.  Wu Q, Madany P, Dobson JR, Schnabl JM, Sharma S et al. 2016. The BRG1 chromatin remodeling enzyme links cancer cell metabolism and proliferation. Oncotarget 7:38270–81
    [Google Scholar]
85. 85.  Sharp JA, Fouts ET, Krawitz DC, Kaufman PD 2001. Yeast histone deposition protein Asf1p requires Hir proteins and PCNA for heterochromatic silencing. Curr. Biol. 11:463–73
    [Google Scholar]
86. 86.  Tagami H, Ray-Gallet D, Almouzni G, Nakatani Y 2004. Histone H3.1 and H3.3 complexes mediate nucleosome assembly pathways dependent or independent of DNA synthesis. Cell 116:51–61
    [Google Scholar]
87. 87.  Krawitz DC, Kama T, Kaufman PD 2002. Chromatin assembly factor I mutants defective for PCNA binding require Asf1/Hir proteins for silencing. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:614–25
    [Google Scholar]
88. 88.  Zhang R, Poustovoitov MV, Ye X, Santos HA, Chen W et al. 2005. Formation of MacroH2A-containing senescence-associated heterochromatin foci and senescence driven by ASF1a and HIRA. Dev. Cell 8:19–30
    [Google Scholar]
89. 89.  Wright RH, Lioutas A, Le Dily F, Soronellas D, Pohl A et al. 2016. ADP-ribose-derived nuclear ATP synthesis by NUDIX5 is required for chromatin remodeling. Science 352:1221–25
    [Google Scholar]
90. 90.  Shi Y, Lan F, Matson C, Mulligan P, Whetstine JR et al. 2004. Histone demethylation mediated by the nuclear amine oxidase homolog LSD1. Cell 119:941–53
    [Google Scholar]
91. 91.  Forneris F, Binda C, Battaglioli E, Mattevi A 2008. LSD1: oxidative chemistry for multifaceted functions in chromatin regulation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 33:181–89
    [Google Scholar]
92. 92.  Kaelin WG Jr, McKnight SL. 2013. Influence of metabolism on epigenetics and disease. Cell 153:56–69
    [Google Scholar]
93. 93.  Mishanina TV, Kohen A 2015. Synthesis and application of isotopically labeled flavin nucleotides. J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm. 58:370–75
    [Google Scholar]
94. 94.  Tsukada Y, Fang J, Erdjument-Bromage H, Warren ME, Borchers CH et al. 2006. Histone demethylation by a family of JmjC domain-containing proteins. Nature 439:811–16
    [Google Scholar]
95. 95.  Kuppuraj G, Kruise D, Yura K 2014. Conformational behavior of flavin adenine dinucleotide: conserved stereochemistry in bound and free states. J. Phys. Chem. B 118:13486–97
    [Google Scholar]
96. 96.  Hino S, Sakamoto A, Nagaoka K, Anan K, Wang Y et al. 2012. FAD-dependent lysine-specific demethylase-1 regulates cellular energy expenditure. Nat. Commun. 3:758
    [Google Scholar]
97. 97.  Zeng X, Jedrychowski MP, Chen Y, Serag S, Lavery GG et al. 2016. Lysine-specific demethylase 1 promotes brown adipose tissue thermogenesis via repressing glucocorticoid activation. Genes Dev 30:1822–36
    [Google Scholar]
98. 98.  Periasamy M, Herrera JL, Reis FCG 2017. Skeletal muscle thermogenesis and its role in whole body energy metabolism. Diabetes Metab. J. 41:327–36
    [Google Scholar]
99. 99.  Klose RJ, Kallin EM, Zhang Y 2006. JmjC-domain-containing proteins and histone demethylation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7:715–27
    [Google Scholar]
100. 100.  Bhutani N, Burns DM, Blau HM 2011. DNA demethylation dynamics. Cell 146:866–72
     [Google Scholar]
101. 101.  Xiao M, Yang H, Xu W, Ma S, Lin H et al. 2012. Inhibition of α-KG-dependent histone and DNA demethylases by fumarate and succinate that are accumulated in mutations of FH and SDH tumor suppressors. Genes Dev 26:1326–38
     [Google Scholar]
102. 102.  Ohgami RS, Campagna DR, Greer EL, Antiochos B, McDonald A et al. 2005. Identification of a ferrireductase required for efficient transferrin-dependent iron uptake in erythroid cells. Nat. Genet. 37:1264–69
     [Google Scholar]
103. 103.  Muckenthaler MU, Rivella S, Hentze MW, Galy B 2017. A red carpet for iron metabolism. Cell 168:344–61
     [Google Scholar]
104. 104.  Yang X, Park SH, Chang HC, Shapiro JS, Vassilopoulos A et al. 2017. Sirtuin 2 regulates cellular iron homeostasis via deacetylation of transcription factor NRF2. J. Clin. Invest. 127:1505–16
     [Google Scholar]
105. 105.  Niu Y, DesMarais TL, Tong Z, Yao Y, Costa M 2015. Oxidative stress alters global histone modification and DNA methylation. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 82:22–28
     [Google Scholar]
106. 106.  Butkinaree C, Park K, Hart GW 2010. O-linked β-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc): extensive crosstalk with phosphorylation to regulate signaling and transcription in response to nutrients and stress. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1800:96–106
     [Google Scholar]
107. 107.  Buse MG. 2006. Hexosamines, insulin resistance, and the complications of diabetes: current status. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 290:E1–8
     [Google Scholar]
108. 108.  Fong JJ, Nguyen BL, Bridger R, Medrano EE, Wells L et al. 2012. β-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) is a novel regulator of mitosis-specific phosphorylations on histone H3. J. Biol. Chem. 287:12195–203
     [Google Scholar]
109. 109.  Lee JS, Zhang Z 2016. O-linked N-acetylglucosamine transferase (OGT) interacts with the histone chaperone HIRA complex and regulates nucleosome assembly and cellular senescence. PNAS 113:E3213–20
     [Google Scholar]
110. 110.  Vella P, Scelfo A, Jammula S, Chiacchiera F, Williams K et al. 2013. Tet proteins connect the O-linked N-acetylglucosamine transferase Ogt to chromatin in embryonic stem cells. Mol. Cell 49:645–56
     [Google Scholar]
111. 111.  Chen Q, Chen Y, Bian C, Fujiki R, Yu X 2013. TET2 promotes histone O-GlcNAcylation during gene transcription. Nature 493:561–64
     [Google Scholar]
112. 112.  Deplus R, Delatte B, Schwinn MK, Defrance M, Mendez J et al. 2013. TET2 and TET3 regulate GlcNAcylation and H3K4 methylation through OGT and SET1/COMPASS. EMBO J 32:645–55
     [Google Scholar]
113. 113.  Lazarus MB, Jiang J, Kapuria V, Bhuiyan T, Janetzko J et al. 2013. HCF-1 is cleaved in the active site of O-GlcNAc transferase. Science 342:1235–39
     [Google Scholar]
114. 114.  Sen P, Shah PP, Nativio R, Berger SL 2016. Epigenetic mechanisms of longevity and aging. Cell 166:822–39
     [Google Scholar]
115. 115.  Hu Z, Chen K, Xia Z, Chavez M, Pal S et al. 2014. Nucleosome loss leads to global transcriptional up-regulation and genomic instability during yeast aging. Genes Dev 28:396–408
     [Google Scholar]
116. 116.  Cournil A, Kirkwood TB 2001. If you would live long, choose your parents well. Trends Genet 17:233–35
     [Google Scholar]
117. 117.  Ruggiero C, Metter EJ, Melenovsky V, Cherubini A, Najjar SS et al. 2008. High basal metabolic rate is a risk factor for mortality: the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. J. Gerontol. A 63:698–706
     [Google Scholar]
118. 118.  Bordone L, Guarente L 2005. Calorie restriction, SIRT1 and metabolism: understanding longevity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6:298–305
     [Google Scholar]
119. 119.  Kaeberlein M, Burtner CR, Kennedy BK 2007. Recent developments in yeast aging. PLOS Genet 3:e84
     [Google Scholar]
120. 120.  Sinclair DA, Guarente L 1997. Extrachromosomal rDNA circles—a cause of aging in yeast. Cell 91:1033–42
     [Google Scholar]
121. 121.  Sen P, Dang W, Donahue G, Dai J, Dorsey J et al. 2015. H3K36 methylation promotes longevity by enhancing transcriptional fidelity. Genes Dev 29:1362–76
     [Google Scholar]
122. 122.  Feser J, Tyler J 2011. Chromatin structure as a mediator of aging. FEBS Lett 585:2041–48
     [Google Scholar]
123. 123.  Peleg S, Feller C, Forne I, Schiller E, Sevin DC et al. 2016. Life span extension by targeting a link between metabolism and histone acetylation in Drosophila. EMBO Rep 17:455–69
     [Google Scholar]
124. 124.  Wellen KE, Hatzivassiliou G, Sachdeva UM, Bui TV, Cross JR, Thompson CB 2009. ATP-citrate lyase links cellular metabolism to histone acetylation. Science 324:1076–80
     [Google Scholar]
125. 125.  Grienenberger A, Miotto B, Sagnier T, Cavalli G, Schramke V et al. 2002. The MYST domain acetyltransferase Chameau functions in epigenetic mechanisms of transcriptional repression. Curr. Biol. 12:762–66
     [Google Scholar]
126. 126.  Fabrizio P, Hoon S, Shamalnasab M, Galbani A, Wei M et al. 2010. Genome-wide screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies vacuolar protein sorting, autophagy, biosynthetic, and tRNA methylation genes involved in life span regulation. PLOS Genet 6:e1001024
     [Google Scholar]
127. 127.  Burtner CR, Murakami CJ, Kennedy BK, Kaeberlein M 2009. A molecular mechanism of chronological aging in yeast. Cell Cycle 8:1256–70
     [Google Scholar]