How Good Can Single-Particle Cryo-EM Become? What Remains Before It Approaches Its Physical Limits?

Literature Cited

1. 1.

   Bai X-c, Fernandez IS, McMullan G, Scheres SHW 2013. Ribosome structures to near-atomic resolution from thirty thousand cryo-EM particles. eLife 2:e00461
   [Google Scholar]
2. 2.

   Bai X-c, Yan C, Yang G, Lu P, Ma D et al. 2015. An atomic structure of human γ-secretase. Nature 525:212–17
   [Google Scholar]
3. 3.

   Baker LA, Smith EA, Bueler SA, Rubinstein JL 2010. The resolution dependence of optimal exposures in liquid nitrogen temperature electron cryomicroscopy of catalase crystals. J. Struct. Biol. 169:431–37
   [Google Scholar]
4. 4.

   Bammes BE, Jakana J, Schmid MF, Chiu W 2010. Radiation damage effects at four specimen temperatures from 4 to 100 K. J. Struct. Biol. 169:331–41
   [Google Scholar]
5. 5.

   Battaglia M, Contarato D, Denes P, Doering D, Duden T et al. 2010. Characterisation of a CMOS active pixel sensor for use in the TEAM microscope. Nuclear Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 622:669–77
   [Google Scholar]
6. 6.

   Boersch H 1947. Uber die Kontraste von Atomen im Electronenmikroskop. Z. Naturforsch. A 2:615–33
   [Google Scholar]
7. 7.

   Breedlove JR, Trammell GT 1970. Molecular microscopy: fundamental limitations. Science 170:1310–13
   [Google Scholar]
8. 8.

   Brilot AF, Chen JZ, Cheng AC, Pan JH, Harrison SC et al. 2012. Beam-induced motion of vitrified specimen on holey carbon film. J. Struct. Biol. 177:630–37
   [Google Scholar]
9. 9.

   Campbell MG, Cheng AC, Brilot AF, Moeller A, Lyumkis D et al. 2012. Movies of ice-embedded particles enhance resolution in electron cryo-microscopy. Structure 20:1823–28
   [Google Scholar]
10. 10.

    Cohen HA, Schmid MF, Chiu W 1984. Estimates of validity of projection approximation for 3-dimensional reconstructions at high resolution. Ultramicroscopy 14:219–26
    [Google Scholar]
11. 11.

    Crowther RA 2016. Preface. Methods in Enzymology 579 The Resolution Revolution: Recent Advances in Cryo-EM, ed. RA Crowther xiii–xx Cambridge, MA: Academic Press
    [Google Scholar]
12. 12.

    Crowther RA, DeRosier DJ, Klug A 1970. The reconstruction of a three-dimensional structure from projections and its application to electron microscopy. Proc. R. Soc. A 317:319–40
    [Google Scholar]
13. 13.

    Dai XH, Zhou ZH 2018. Structure of the herpes simplex virus 1 capsid with associated tegument protein complexes. Science 360:eaa07298
    [Google Scholar]
14. 14.

    Danev R, Baumeister W 2016. Cryo-EM single particle analysis with the Volta phase plate. eLife 5:e13046
    [Google Scholar]
15. 15.

    Danev R, Buijsse B, Khoshouei M, Plitzko JM, Baumeister W 2014. Volta potential phase plate for in-focus phase contrast transmission electron microscopy. PNAS 111:15635–40
    [Google Scholar]
16. 16.

    Danev R, Tegunov D, Baumeister W 2017. Using the Volta phase plate with defocus for cryo-EM single particle analysis. eLife 6:e23006
    [Google Scholar]
17. 17.

    DeRosier DJ 2000. Correction of high-resolution data for curvature of the Ewald sphere. Ultramicroscopy 81:83–98
    [Google Scholar]
18. 18.

    Downing KH, Glaeser RM 2008. Restoration of weak phase-contrast images recorded with a high degree of defocus: the “twin image” problem associated with CTF correction. Ultramicroscopy 108:921–28
    [Google Scholar]
19. 19.

    Downing KH, Glaeser RM 2018. Estimating the effect of finite depth of field in single-particle cryo-EM. Ultramicroscopy 184:94–99
    [Google Scholar]
20. 20.

    Earl LA, Falconieri V, Milne JLS, Subramaniam S 2017. Cryo-EM: beyond the microscope. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 46:71–78
    [Google Scholar]
21. 21.

    Frank J 2006. Three-Dimensional Electron Microscopy of Macromolecular Assemblies: Visualization of Biological Molecules in Their Native State New York: Oxford Univ. Press
22. 22.

    Gao Y, Cao E, Julius D, Cheng Y 2016. TRPV1 structures in nanodiscs reveal mechanisms of ligand and lipid action. Nature 534:347–51
    [Google Scholar]
23. 23.

    Glaeser RM 1971. Limitations to significant information in biological electron microscopy as a result of radiation damage. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 36:466–82
    [Google Scholar]
24. 24.

    Glaeser RM 1999. Review: electron crystallography: present excitement, a nod to the past, anticipating the future. J. Struct. Biol. 128:3–14
    [Google Scholar]
25. 25.

    Glaeser RM 2008. Retrospective: radiation damage and its associated “Information Limitations. .” J. Struct. Biol. 163:271–76
    [Google Scholar]
26. 26.

    Glaeser RM 2013. Invited review article: methods for imaging weak-phase objects in electron microscopy. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 84:111101
    [Google Scholar]
27. 27.

    Glaeser RM 2013. Stroboscopic imaging of macromolecular complexes. Nat. Methods 10:475–76
    [Google Scholar]
28. 28.

    Glaeser RM 2016. How good can cryo-EM become. ? Nat. Methods 13:28–32
    [Google Scholar]
29. 29.

    Glaeser RM, Downing K, DeRosier D, Chiu W, Frank J 2007. Electron Crystallography of Biological Macromolecules New York: Oxford Univ. Press
30. 30.

    Glaeser RM, Sassolini S, Cambie R, Jin J, Cabrini S et al. 2013. Minimizing electrostatic charging of an aperture used to produce in-focus phase contrast in the TEM. Ultramicroscopy 135:6–15
    [Google Scholar]
31. 31.

    Glaeser RM, Taylor KA 1978. Radiation damage relative to transmission electron microscopy of biological specimens at low temperature: a review. J. Microsc. 112:127–38
    [Google Scholar]
32. 32.

    Grob P, Bean D, Typke D, Li XM, Nogales E, Glaeser RM 2013. Ranking TEM cameras by their response to electron shot noise. Ultramicroscopy 133:1–7
    [Google Scholar]
33. 33.

    Hayward SB, Glaeser RM 1979. Radiation damage of purple membrane at low temperature. Ultramicroscopy 4:201–10
    [Google Scholar]
34. 34.

    Henderson R 1995. The potential and limitations of neutrons, electrons and X-rays for atomic-resolution microscopy of unstained biological molecules. Q. Rev. Biophys. 28:171–93
    [Google Scholar]
35. 35.

    Herzik MA Jr, Wu M, Lander GC 2017. Achieving better-than-3-Å resolution by single-particle cryo-EM at 200 keV. Nat. Methods 14:1075
    [Google Scholar]
36. 36.

    Juffmann T, Koppell SA, Klopfer BB, Ophus C, Glaeser RM, Kasevich MA 2017. Multi-pass transmission electron microscopy. Sci. Rep. 7:1699
    [Google Scholar]
37. 37.

    Kasinath V, Faini M, Poepsel S, Reif D, Feng XA et al. 2018. Structures of human PRC2 with its cofactors AEBP2 and JARID2. Science 359:940–44
    [Google Scholar]
38. 38.

    Khoshouei M, Radjainia M, Baumeister W, Danev R 2017. Cryo-EM structure of haemoglobin at 3.2 Å determined with the Volta phase plate. Nat. Commun. 8:16099
    [Google Scholar]
39. 39.

    Kühlbrandt W 2014. The resolution revolution. Science 343:1443–44
    [Google Scholar]
40. 40.

    Kuijper M, van Hoften G, Janssen B, Geurink R, De Carlo S et al. 2015. FEI's direct electron detector developments: embarking on a revolution in cryo-TEM. J. Struct. Biol. 192:179–87
    [Google Scholar]
41. 41.

    Kuo IAM, Glaeser RM 1975. Development of methodology for low exposure, high resolution electron microscopy of biological specimens. Ultramicroscopy 1:53–66
    [Google Scholar]
42. 42.

    Kwiat P, Weinfurter H, Herzog T, Zeilinger A, Kasevich MA 1995. Interaction-free measurement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74:4763–66
    [Google Scholar]
43. 43.

    Li XM, Mooney P, Zheng S, Booth CR, Braunfeld MB et al. 2013. Electron counting and beam-induced motion correction enable near-atomic-resolution single-particle cryo-EM. Nat. Methods 10:584–90
    [Google Scholar]
44. 44.

    Liu F, Zhang Z, Csanády L, Gadsby DC, Chen J 2017. Molecular structure of the human CFTR ion channel. Cell 169:85–95
    [Google Scholar]
45. 45.

    Marko M, Leith A, Hsieh C, Danev R 2011. Retrofit implementation of Zernike phase plate imaging for cryo-TEM. J. Struct. Biol. 174:400–12
    [Google Scholar]
46. 46.

    McMullan G, Chen S, Henderson R, Faruqi AR 2009. Detective quantum efficiency of electron area detectors in electron microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 109:1126–43
    [Google Scholar]
47. 47.

    McMullan G, Faruqi AR, Clare D, Henderson R 2014. Comparison of optimal performance at 300 keV of three direct electron detectors for use in low dose electron microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 147:156–63
    [Google Scholar]
48. 48.

    McMullan G, Faruqi AR, Henderson R 2016. Direct electron detectors. Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 579: Resolution Revolution: Recent Advances in Cryo-EM RA Crowther 1–17 Cambridge, MA: Academic Press
    [Google Scholar]
49. 49.

    Meyerson JR, Rao P, Kumar J, Chittori S, Banerjee S et al. 2014. Self-assembled monolayers improve protein distribution on holey carbon cryo-EM supports. Sci. Rep. 4:7084
    [Google Scholar]
50. 50.

    Mueller H, Jin JA, Danev R, Spence J, Padmore H, Glaeser RM 2010. Design of an electron microscope phase plate using a focused continuous-wave laser. New J. Phys. 12:073011
    [Google Scholar]
51. 51.

    Nogales E 2016. The development of cryo-EM into a mainstream structural biology technique. Nat. Methods 13:24–27
    [Google Scholar]
52. 52.

    Okamoto H 2012. Possible use of a Cooper-pair box for low-dose electron microscopy. Phys. Rev. A 85:043810
    [Google Scholar]
53. 53.

    Okamoto H, Nagatani Y 2014. Entanglement-assisted electron microscopy based on a flux qubit. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104:062604
    [Google Scholar]
54. 54.

    Plaschka C, Lin P-C, Nagai K 2017. Structure of a pre-catalytic spliceosome. Nature 546:617–21
    [Google Scholar]
55. 55.

    Reimer L, Kohl H 2008. Transmission Electron Microscopy Physics of Image Formation New York: Springer
56. 56.

    Rosenthal PB, Henderson R 2003. Optimal determination of particle orientation, absolute hand, and contrast loss in single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 333:721–45
    [Google Scholar]
57. 57.

    Ruskin RS, Yu ZH, Grigorieff N 2013. Quantitative characterization of electron detectors for transmission electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 184:385–93
    [Google Scholar]
58. 58.

    Russo CJ, Henderson R 2018. Ewald sphere correction using a single side-band image processing algorithm. Ultramicroscopy 187:26–33
    [Google Scholar]
59. 59.

    Russo CJ, Passmore LA 2014. Ultrastable gold substrates for electron cryomicroscopy. Science 346:1377–80
    [Google Scholar]
60. 60.

    Russo CJ, Passmore LA 2016. Ultrastable gold substrates: properties of a support for high-resolution electron cryomicroscopy of biological specimens. J. Struct. Biol. 193:33–44
    [Google Scholar]
61. 61.

    Scheres SHW 2014. Beam-induced motion correction for sub-megadalton cryo-EM particles. eLife 3:e03665
    [Google Scholar]
62. 62.

    Scheres SHW, Gao HX, Valle M, Herman GT, Eggermont PPB et al. 2007. Disentangling conformational states of macromolecules in 3D-EM through likelihood optimization. Nat. Methods 4:27–29
    [Google Scholar]
63. 63.

    Schilbach S, Hantsche M, Tegunov D, Dienemann C, Wigge C et al. 2017. Structures of transcription pre-initiation complex with TFIIH and Mediator. Nature 551:204–9
    [Google Scholar]
64. 64.

    Schroder RR 2015. Advances in electron microscopy: a qualitative view of instrumentation development for macromolecular imaging and tomography. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 581:25–38
    [Google Scholar]
65. 65.

    Schur FKM, Obr M, Hagen WJH, Wan W, Jakobi AJ et al. 2016. An atomic model of HIV-1 capsid-SP1 reveals structures regulating assembly and maturation. Science 353:506–8
    [Google Scholar]
66. 66.

    Spence JCH, Hawkes PW 2008. Diffract-and-destroy: Can X-ray lasers “solve” the radiation damage problem?. Ultramicroscopy 108:1502–3
    [Google Scholar]
67. 67.

    Tan YZ, Aiyer S, Mietzsch M, Hull JA, McKenna R et al. 2018. Sub-2 Å Ewald curvature corrected single-particle cryo-EM. Nat. Commun 9:3628
    [Google Scholar]
68. 68.

    Thomas S, Kohstall C, Kruit P, Hommelhoff P 2014. Semitransparency in interaction-free measurements. Phys. Rev. A 90:053840
    [Google Scholar]
69. 69.

    Unwin PNT, Henderson R 1975. Molecular-structure determination by electron-microscopy of unstained crystalline specimens. J. Mol. Biol. 94:425–40
    [Google Scholar]
70. 70.

    Vinothkumar KR, Henderson R 2016. Single particle electron cryomicroscopy: trends, issues and future perspective. Q. Rev. Biophys. 49:1–25
    [Google Scholar]
71. 71.

    Walter A, Steltenkamp S, Schmitz S, Holik P, Pakanavicius E et al. 2015. Towards an optimum design for electrostatic phase plates. Ultramicroscopy 153:22–31
    [Google Scholar]
72. 72.

    Wolf M, DeRosier DJ, Grigorieff N 2006. Ewald sphere correction for single-particle electron microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 106:376–82
    [Google Scholar]
73. 73.

    Yonekura K, Braunfeld MB, Maki-Yonekura S, Agard DA 2006. Electron energy filtering significantly improves amplitude contrast of frozen-hydrated protein at 300 kV. J. Struct. Biol. 156:524–36
    [Google Scholar]
74. 74.

    Yonekura K, Yakushi T, Atsumi T, Maki-Yonekura S, Homma M, Namba K 2006. Electron cryomicroscopic visualization of PomA/B stator units of the sodium-driven flagellar motor in liposomes. J. Mol. Biol. 357:73–81
    [Google Scholar]
75. 75.

    Yuan SA, Wang JL, Zhu DJ, Wang N, Gao Q et al. 2018. Cryo-EM structure of a herpesvirus capsid at 3.1 angstrom. Science 360:eaao7283
    [Google Scholar]
76. 76.

    Zapp Machalek A 2012. Chapter 1: an owner's guide to the cell. Inside the Cell Bethesda, MD: Natl. Inst. Gen. Med. Sci.
    [Google Scholar]
77. 77.

    Zernike F 1955. How I discovered phase contrast. Science 121:345–49
    [Google Scholar]
78. 78.

    Zhang Y, Sun BF, Feng D, Hu HL, Chu M et al. 2017. Cryo-EM structure of the activated GLP-1 receptor in complex with a G protein. Nature 546:248–53
    [Google Scholar]
79. 79.

    Zheng SQ, Palovcak E, Armache JP, Verba KA, Cheng YF, Agard DA 2017. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14:331–32
    [Google Scholar]