Dynamic Neutron Scattering by Biological Systems

Literature Cited

1. 1.  Acbas G, Niessen KA, Snell EH, Markelz AG 2014. Optical measurements of long-range protein vibrations. Nat. Commun. 5:3076
   [Google Scholar]
2. 2.  Ackerson BJ, Pusey PN, Tough RJA 1982. Interpretation of the intermediate scattering function at short times. J. Chem. Phys. 76:1279–82
   [Google Scholar]
3. 3.  Alberts B. 1998. The cell as a collection of protein machines: preparing the next generation of molecular biologists. Cell 92:291–94
   [Google Scholar]
4. 4.  Atilgan AR, Durell SR, Jernigan RL, Demirel MC, Keskin O, Bahar I 2001. Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. Biophys. J. 80:505–15
   [Google Scholar]
5. 5.  Balog E, Becker T, Oettl M, Lechner R, Daniel R et al. 2004. Direct determination of vibrational density of states change on ligand binding to a protein. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93:28103
   [Google Scholar]
6. 6.  Balog E, Perahia D, Smith JC, Merzel F 2011. Vibrational softening of a protein on ligand binding. J. Phys. Chem. B 115:6811–17
   [Google Scholar]
7. 7.  Becker T, Hayward JA, Finney JL, Daniel RM, Smith JC 2004. Neutron frequency windows and the protein dynamical transition. Biophys. J. 87:1436–44
   [Google Scholar]
8. 8.  Becker T, Smith JC 2003. Energy resolution and dynamical heterogeneity effects on elastic incoherent neutron scattering from molecular systems. Phys. Rev. E 67:21904
   [Google Scholar]
9. 9.  Bee M. 1988. Quasielastic Neutron Scattering: Principles and Application in Solid-State Chemistry, Biology and Materials Science Bristol, UK: Adam Hilger
10. 10.  Bicout DJ, Zaccai G 2001. Protein flexibility from the dynamical transition: a force constant analysis. Biophys. J. 80:1115–23
    [Google Scholar]
11. 11.  Biehl R, Hoffmann B, Monkenbusch M, Falus P, Préost S et al. 2008. Direct observation of correlated interdomain motion in alcohol dehydrogenase. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101:138102
    [Google Scholar]
12. 12.  Boura E, Różycki B, Herrick DZ, Chung HS, Vecer J et al. 2011. Solution structure of the ESCRT-I complex by small-angle X-ray scattering, EPR, and FRET spectroscopy. PNAS 108:9437–42
    [Google Scholar]
13. 13.  Bu Z, Biehl R, Monkenbusch M, Richter D, Callaway DJE 2005. Coupled protein domain motion in Taq polymerase revealed by neutron spin-echo spectroscopy. PNAS 102:17646–51
    [Google Scholar]
14. 14.  Busch S, Smuda C, Pardo LC, Unruh T 2010. Molecular mechanism of long-range diffusion in phospholipid membranes studied by quasielastic neutron scattering. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132:3232–33
    [Google Scholar]
15. 15.  Calandrini V, Hamon V, Hinsen K, Calligari P, Bellissent-Funel M-C, Kneller GR 2008. Relaxation dynamics of lysozyme in solution under pressure: combining molecular dynamics simulations and quasielastic neutron scattering. Chem. Phys. 345:289–97
    [Google Scholar]
16. 16.  Capaccioli S, Ngai KL, Ancherbak S, Paciaroni A 2012. Evidence of coexistence of change of caged dynamics at T_g and the dynamic transition at T_d in solvated proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 116:1745–57
    [Google Scholar]
17. 17.  Chen S-H, Lagi M, Chu X, Zhang Y, Kim C et al. 2010. Dynamics of a globular protein and its hydration water studied by neutron scattering and MD simulations. Spectrosc. Int. J. 24:1–24
    [Google Scholar]
18. 18.  Chen S-H, Liu L, Fratini E, Baglioni P, Faraone A, Mamontov E 2006. Observation of fragile-to-strong dynamic crossover in protein hydration water. PNAS 103:9012–16
    [Google Scholar]
19. 19.  Chudley CT, Elliott RJ 1961. Neutron scattering from a liquid on a jump diffusion model. Proc. Phys. Soc. 77:353
    [Google Scholar]
20. 20.  Conti Nibali V, D'Angelo G, Paciaroni A, Tobias DJ, Tarek M 2014. On the coupling between the collective dynamics of proteins and their hydration water. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5:1181–86
    [Google Scholar]
21. 21.  Cusack S, Smith J, Finney J, Tidor B, Karplus M 1988. Inelastic neutron scattering analysis of picosecond internal protein dynamics: comparison of harmonic theory with experiment. J. Mol. Biol. 202:903–8
    [Google Scholar]
22. 22.  Daniel RM, Dunn R V, Finney JL, Smith JC 2003. The role of dynamics in enzyme activity. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 32:69–92
    [Google Scholar]
23. 23.  De Gennes PG 1959. Liquid dynamics and inelastic scattering of neutrons. Physica 25:825–39
    [Google Scholar]
24. 24.  Doster W. 2010. The protein-solvent glass transition. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1804:3–14
    [Google Scholar]
25. 25.  Doster W. 2011. The two-step scenario of the protein dynamical transition. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 357:622–28
    [Google Scholar]
26. 26.  Doster W, Cusack S, Petry W 1989. Dynamical transition of myoglobin revealed by inelastic neutron scattering. Nature 337:754–56
    [Google Scholar]
27. 27.  Doster W, Cusack S, Petry W 1990. Dynamic instability of liquidlike motions in a globular protein observed by inelastic neutron scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65:1080–83
    [Google Scholar]
28. 28.  Doster W, Settles M 2005. Protein-water displacement distributions. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1749:173–86
    [Google Scholar]
29. 29.  Evans BR, Bali G, Foston M, Ragauskas AJ, O'Neill HM et al. 2015. Production of deuterated switchgrass by hydroponic cultivation. Planta 242:215–22
    [Google Scholar]
30. 30.  Farago B, Li J, Cornilescu G, Callaway DJE, Bu Z 2010. Activation of nanoscale allosteric protein domain motion revealed by neutron spin echo spectroscopy. Biophys. J. 99:3473–82
    [Google Scholar]
31. 31.  Faure P, Micu A, Perahia D, Doucet J, Smith JC, Benoit JP 1994. Correlated intramolecular motions and diffuse X-ray scattering in lysozyme. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 1:124–28
    [Google Scholar]
32. 32.  Fenimore PW, Frauenfelder H, McMahon BH, Parak FG 2002. Slaving: solvent fluctuations dominate protein dynamics and functions. PNAS 99:16047–51
    [Google Scholar]
33. 33.  Ferrand M, Dianoux AJ, Petry W, Zaccai G 1993. Thermal motions and function of bacteriorhodopsin in purple membranes: effects of temperature and hydration studied by neutron scattering. PNAS 90:9668–72
    [Google Scholar]
34. 34.  Fischer S, Smith JC, Verma CS 2001. Dissecting the vibrational entropy change on protein/ligand binding: burial of a water molecule in bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. J. Phys. Chem. B 105:8050–55
    [Google Scholar]
35. 35.  Fischer S, Verma CS 1999. Binding of buried structural water increases the flexibility of proteins. PNAS 96:9613–15
    [Google Scholar]
36. 36.  Frauenfelder H, Chen G, Berendzen J, Fenimore PW, Jansson H et al. 2009. A unified model of protein dynamics. PNAS 106:5129–34
    [Google Scholar]
37. 37.  Frauenfelder H, Sligar SG, Wolynes PG 1991. The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. Urbana 51:61801
    [Google Scholar]
38. 38.  Fuglebakk E, Reuter N, Hinsen K 2013. Evaluation of protein elastic network models based on an analysis of collective motions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9:5618–28
    [Google Scholar]
39. 39.  Gabel F, Bicout D, Lehnert U, Tehei M, Weik M, Zaccai G 2002. Protein dynamics studied by neutron scattering. Q. Rev. Biophys. 35:327–67
    [Google Scholar]
40. 40.  Gallat FX, Laganowsky A, Wood K, Gabel F, Van Eijck L et al. 2012. Dynamical coupling of intrinsically disordered proteins and their hydration water: comparison with folded soluble and membrane proteins. Biophys. J. 103:129–36
    [Google Scholar]
41. 41.  Gliss C, Randel O, Casalta H, Sackmann E, Zorn R, Bayerl T 1999. Anisotropic motion of cholesterol in oriented DPPC bilayers studied by quasielastic neutron scattering: the liquid-ordered phase. Biophys. J. 77:331–40
    [Google Scholar]
42. 42.  Glöckle WG, Nonnenmacher TF 1995. A fractional calculus approach to self-similar protein dynamics. Biophys. J. 68:46–53
    [Google Scholar]
43. 43.  Goupil-Lamy AV, Smith JC, Yunoki J, Parker SF, Kataoka M 1997. High-resolution vibrational inelastic neutron scattering: a new spectroscopic tool for globular proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119:9268–73
    [Google Scholar]
44. 44.  Granek R, Klafter J 2005. Fractons in proteins: Can they lead to anomalously decaying time autocorrelations?. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95:098106
    [Google Scholar]
45. 45.  Grigera TS, Martin-Mayor V, Parisi G, Verrocchio P 2003. Phonon interpretation of the ‘boson peak’ in supercooled liquids. Nature 422:289–92
    [Google Scholar]
46. 46.  Hammes GG, Chang YC, Oas TG 2009. Conformational selection or induced fit: a flux description of reaction mechanism. PNAS 106:13737–41
    [Google Scholar]
47. 47.  Hartmann H, Parak F, Steigemann W, Petsko GA, Ponzi DR, Frauenfelder H 1982. Conformational substates in a protein: structure and dynamics of metmyoglobin at 80 K. PNAS 79:4967–71
    [Google Scholar]
48. 48.  Hayward JA, Finney JL, Daniel RM, Smith JC 2003. Molecular dynamics decomposition of temperature-dependent elastic neutron scattering by a protein solution. Biophys. J. 85:679–85
    [Google Scholar]
49. 49.  Hayward JA, Smith JC 2002. Temperature dependence of protein dynamics: computer simulation analysis of neutron scattering properties. Biophys. J. 82:1216–25
    [Google Scholar]
50. 50.  Héry S, Genest D, Smith JC 1998. X-ray diffuse scattering and rigid-body motion in crystalline lysozyme probed by molecular dynamics simulation. J. Mol. Biol. 279:303–19
    [Google Scholar]
51. 51.  Hinsen K, Pellegrini E, Stachura S, Kneller GR 2012. nMoldyn 3: using task farming for a parallel spectroscopy-oriented analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 33:2043–48
    [Google Scholar]
52. 52.  Hinsen K, Petrescu A-J, Dellerue S, Bellissent-Funel M-C, Kneller GR 2000. Harmonicity in slow protein dynamics. Chem. Phys. 261:25–37
    [Google Scholar]
53. 53.  Hong L, Cheng X, Glass DC, Smith JC 2012. Surface hydration amplifies single-well protein atom diffusion propagating into the macromolecular core. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108:238102
    [Google Scholar]
54. 54.  Hong L, Glass DC, Nickels JD, Perticaroli S, Yi Z et al. 2013. Elastic and conformational softness of a globular protein. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110:028104
    [Google Scholar]
55. 55.  Hong L, Jain N, Cheng X, Bernal A, Tyagi M, Smith JC 2016. Determination of functional collective motions in a protein at atomic resolution using coherent neutron scattering. Sci. Adv. 2:1–8
    [Google Scholar]
56. 56.  Hong L, Smolin N, Lindner B, Sokolov AP, Smith JC 2011. Three classes of motion in the dynamic neutron-scattering susceptibility of a globular protein. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107:148102
    [Google Scholar]
57. 57.  Hong L, Smolin N, Smith JC 2014. de Gennes narrowing describes the relative motion of protein domains. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112:158102
    [Google Scholar]
58. 58.  Hu X, Hong L, Smith MD, Neusius T, Cheng X, Smith JC 2016. The dynamics of single protein molecules is non-equilibrium and self-similar over thirteen decades in time. Nat. Phys. 12:171–74
    [Google Scholar]
59. 59.  Igumenova TI, Frederick KK, Wand AJ 2006. Characterization of the fast dynamics of protein amino acid side chains using NMR relaxation in solution. Chem. Rev. 106:1672–99
    [Google Scholar]
60. 60.  Inoue R, Biehl R, Rosenkranz T, Fitter J, Monkenbusch M et al. 2010. Large domain fluctuations on 50-ns timescale enable catalytic activity in phosphoglycerate kinase. Biophys. J. 99:2309–17
    [Google Scholar]
61. 61.  Jasnin M, Moulin M, Haertlein M, Zaccai G, Tehei M 2008. In vivo measurement of internal and global macromolecular motions in Escherichia coli. Biophys. J. 95:857–64
    [Google Scholar]
62. 62.  Jasnin M, Van Eijck L, Koza MM, Peters J, Laguri C et al. 2010. Dynamics of heparan sulfate explored by neutron scattering. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 12:3360–62
    [Google Scholar]
63. 63.  Johs A, Harwood IM, Parks JM, Nauss RE, Smith JC et al. 2011. Structural characterization of intramolecular Hg²⁺ transfer between flexibly linked domains of mercuric ion reductase. J. Mol. Biol. 413:639–56
    [Google Scholar]
64. 64.  Katava M, Maccarini M, Villain G, Paciaroni A, Sztucki M et al. 2017. Thermal activation of “allosteric-like” large-scale motions in a eukaryotic lactate dehydrogenase. Sci. Rep. 7:41092
    [Google Scholar]
65. 65.  Kearley GJ, Fillaux F, Baron MH, Bennington S, Tomkinson J 1994. A new look at proton transfer dynamics along the hydrogen bonds in amides and peptides. Science 264:1285–88
    [Google Scholar]
66. 66.  Kearley GJ, Johnson MR, Plazanet M, Suard E 2001. Structure and vibrational dynamics of the strongly hydrogen-bonded model peptide: N-methyl acetamide. J. Chem. Phys. 115:2614–20
    [Google Scholar]
67. 67.  Keller BG, Prinz J-H, Noé F 2012. Markov models and dynamical fingerprints: unraveling the complexity of molecular kinetics. Chem. Phys. 396:92–107
    [Google Scholar]
68. 68.  Khodadadi S, Malkovskiy A, Kisliuk A, Sokolov AP 2010. A broad glass transition in hydrated proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1804:15–19
    [Google Scholar]
69. 69.  Khodadadi S, Pawlus S, Roh JH, Garcia Sakai V, Mamontov E, Sokolov AP 2008. The origin of the dynamic transition in proteins. J. Chem. Phys. 128:195106
    [Google Scholar]
70. 70.  Khodadadi S, Pawlus S, Sokolov AP 2008. Influence of hydration on protein dynamics: combining dielectric and neutron scattering spectroscopy data. J. Phys. Chem. B 112:14273–80
    [Google Scholar]
71. 71.  Khodadadi S, Sokolov AP 2015. Protein dynamics: from rattling in a cage to structural relaxation. Soft Matter 11:4984–98
    [Google Scholar]
72. 72.  Kneller GR. 2000. Inelastic neutron scattering from damped collective vibrations of macromolecules. Chem. Phys. 261:1–24
    [Google Scholar]
73. 73.  Kneller GR. 2005. Quasielastic neutron scattering and relaxation processes in proteins: analytical and simulation-based models. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7:2641–55
    [Google Scholar]
74. 74.  Kneller GR, Hinsen K 2004. Fractional Brownian dynamics in proteins. J. Chem. Phys. 121:10278–83
    [Google Scholar]
75. 75.  Kneller GR, Hinsen K 2009. Quantitative model for the heterogeneity of atomic position fluctuations in proteins: a simulation study. J. Chem. Phys. 131:045104
    [Google Scholar]
76. 76.  Kou SC, Xie XS 2004. Generalized Langevin equation with fractional Gaussian noise: subdiffusion within a single protein molecule. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93:180603
    [Google Scholar]
77. 77.  Krishnan M, Kurkal-Siebert V, Smith JC 2008. Methyl group dynamics and the onset of anharmonicity in myoglobin. J. Phys. Chem. B 112:5522–33
    [Google Scholar]
78. 78.  Kurkal-Siebert V, Smith JC 2006. Low-temperature protein dynamics: a simulation analysis of interprotein vibrations and the boson peak at 150 K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128:2356–64
    [Google Scholar]
79. 79.  Langan P, Petridis L, O'Neill HM, Pingali SV, Foston M et al. 2014. Common processes drive the thermochemical pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Green Chem 16:63–68
    [Google Scholar]
80. 80.  Lindner B, Smith JC 2012. Sassena—X-ray and neutron scattering calculated from molecular dynamics trajectories using massively parallel computers. Comput. Phys. Commun. 183:1491–501
    [Google Scholar]
81. 81.  Lindner B, Yi Z, Prinz J-H, Smith JC, Noé F 2013. Dynamic neutron scattering from conformational dynamics. I. Theory and Markov models. J. Chem. Phys. 139:175102
    [Google Scholar]
82. 82.  Liu Z, Huang J, Tyagi M, O'Neill H, Zhang Q et al. 2017. Dynamical transition of collective motions in dry proteins. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119:048101
    [Google Scholar]
83. 83.  Luo G, Andricioaei I, Xie XS, Karplus M 2006. Dynamic distance disorder in proteins is caused by trapping. J. Phys. Chem. B 110:9363–67
    [Google Scholar]
84. 84.  Ma B, Nussinov R 2010. Enzyme dynamics point to stepwise conformational selection in catalysis. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 14:652–59
    [Google Scholar]
85. 85.  Magazù S, Migliardo F, Benedetto A 2010. Mean square displacements from elastic incoherent neutron scattering evaluated by spectrometers working with different energy resolution on dry and hydrated (H₂O and D₂O) lysozyme. J. Phys. Chem. B 114:9268–74
    [Google Scholar]
86. 86.  Magazù S, Migliardo F, Benedetto A 2011. Puzzle of protein dynamical transition. J. Phys. Chem. B 115:7736–43
    [Google Scholar]
87. 87.  Marty V, Jasnin M, Fabiani E, Vauclare P, Gabel F et al. 2013. Neutron scattering: a tool to detect in vivo thermal stress effects at the molecular dynamics level in micro-organisms. J. R. Soc. Interface 10:20130003
    [Google Scholar]
88. 88.  McCammon JA, Gelin BR, Karplus M, Wolynes PG 1976. The hinge-bending mode in lysozyme. Nature 262:325–26
    [Google Scholar]
89. 89.  Meinhold L, Clement D, Tehei M, Daniel R, Finney JL, Smith JC 2008. Protein dynamics and stability: the distribution of atomic fluctuations in thermophilic and mesophilic dihydrofolate reductase derived using elastic incoherent neutron scattering. Biophys. J. 94:4812–18
    [Google Scholar]
90. 90.  Meinhold L, Merzel F, Smith JC 2007. Lattice dynamics of a protein crystal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99:138101
    [Google Scholar]
91. 91.  Meinhold L, Smith JC 2005. Correlated dynamics determining X-ray diffuse scattering from a crystalline protein revealed by molecular dynamics simulation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95:218103
    [Google Scholar]
92. 92.  Meinhold L, Smith JC 2007. Protein dynamics from X-ray crystallography: anisotropic, global motion in diffuse scattering patterns. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 66:941–53
    [Google Scholar]
93. 93.  Miao Y, Yi Z, Cantrell C, Glass DC, Baudry J et al. 2012. Coupled flexibility change in cytochrome P450cam substrate binding determined by neutron scattering, NMR, and molecular dynamics simulation. Biophys. J. 103:2167–76
    [Google Scholar]
94. 94.  Miao Y, Yi Z, Glass DC, Hong L, Tyagi M et al. 2012. Temperature-dependent dynamical transitions of different classes of amino acid residue in a globular protein. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134:19576–79
    [Google Scholar]
95. 95.  Min W, Luo G, Cherayil BJ, Kou SC, Xie XS 2005. Observation of a power-law memory kernel for fluctuations within a single protein molecule. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94:198302
    [Google Scholar]
96. 96.  Moritsugu K, Kidera A, Smith JC 2014. Solvent friction effects propagate over the entire protein molecule through low-frequency collective modes. J. Phys. Chem. B 118:8559–65
    [Google Scholar]
97. 97.  Moritsugu K, Njunda BM, Smith JC 2009. Theory and normal-mode analysis of change in protein vibrational dynamics on ligand binding. J. Phys. Chem. B 114:1479–85
    [Google Scholar]
98. 98.  Moritsugu K, Smith JC 2007. Coarse-grained biomolecular simulation with REACH: realistic extension algorithm via covariance Hessian. Biophys. J. 93:3460–69
    [Google Scholar]
99. 99.  Motlagh HN, Hilser VJ 2012. Agonism/antagonism switching in allosteric ensembles. PNAS 109:4134–39
    [Google Scholar]
100. 100.  Nagao M. 2009. Observation of local thickness fluctuations in surfactant membranes using neutron spin echo. Phys. Rev. E 80:031606
     [Google Scholar]
101. 101.  Nakagawa H, Kamikubo H, Kataoka M 2010. Effect of conformational states on protein dynamical transition. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1804:27–33
     [Google Scholar]
102. 102.  Nakagawa H, Kamikubo H, Tsukushi I, Kanaya T, Kataoka M 2004. Protein dynamical heterogeneity derived from neutron incoherent elastic scattering. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 73:491–95
     [Google Scholar]
103. 103.  Nardi F, Doster W, Tidor B, Karplus M, Cusack S, Smith JC 1994. Dynamics of tRNA: experimental neutron spectra compared with a normal mode analysis. Isr. J. Chem. 34:233–38
     [Google Scholar]
104. 104.  Neusius T, Daidone I, Sokolov IM, Smith JC 2008. Subdiffusion in peptides originates from the fractal-like structure of configuration space. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100:188103
     [Google Scholar]
105. 105.  Neusius T, Sokolov IM, Smith JC 2009. Subdiffusion in time-averaged, confined random walks. Phys. Rev. E 80:011109
     [Google Scholar]
106. 106.  Nickels JD, Chatterjee S, Stanley CB, Qian S, Cheng X et al. 2017. The in vivo structure of biological membranes and evidence for lipid domains. PLOS Biol 15:e2002214
     [Google Scholar]
107. 107.  Nickels JD, Cheng X, Mostofian B, Stanley C, Lindner B et al. 2015. Mechanical properties of nanoscopic lipid domains. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137:15772–80
     [Google Scholar]
108. 108.  Noé F, Doose S, Daidone I, Löllmann M, Sauer M et al. 2011. Dynamical fingerprints for probing individual relaxation processes in biomolecular dynamics with simulations and kinetic experiments. PNAS 108:4822–27
     [Google Scholar]
109. 109.  Noé F, Fischer S 2008. Transition networks for modeling the kinetics of conformational change in macromolecules. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 18:154–62
     [Google Scholar]
110. 110.  Noé F, Horenko I, Schütte C, Smith JC 2007. Hierarchical analysis of conformational dynamics in biomolecules: transition networks of metastable states. J. Chem. Phys. 126:155102
     [Google Scholar]
111. 111.  Paciaroni A, Bizzarri AR, Cannistraro S 1999. Neutron scattering evidence of a boson peak in protein hydration water. Phys. Rev. E 60:R2476–79
     [Google Scholar]
112. 112.  Pande VS, Beauchamp K, Bowman GR 2010. Everything you wanted to know about Markov state models but were afraid to ask. Methods 52:99–105
     [Google Scholar]
113. 113.  Parak F, Formanek H 1971. Untersuchung des Schwingungsanteils und des Kristallgitterfehleranteils des Temperaturfaktors in Myoglobin durch Vergleich von Mössbauer-absorptionsmessungen mit Röntgenstrukturdaten. Acta Crystallogr 27:573–78
     [Google Scholar]
114. 114.  Parak F, Frolov EN, Mössbauer RL, Goldanskii VI 1981. Dynamics of metmyoglobin crystals investigated by nuclear gamma resonance absorption. J. Mol. Biol. 145:825–33
     [Google Scholar]
115. 115.  Perticaroli S, Nickels JD, Ehlers G, Sokolov AP 2014. Rigidity, secondary structure, and the universality of the boson peak in proteins. Biophys. J. 106:2667–74
     [Google Scholar]
116. 116.  Peters J, Kneller GR 2013. Motional heterogeneity in human acetylcholinesterase revealed by a non-Gaussian model for elastic incoherent neutron scattering. J. Chem. Phys. 139:165102
     [Google Scholar]
117. 117.  Petridis L, O'Neill HM, Johnsen M, Fan B, Schulz R et al. 2014. Hydration control of the mechanical and dynamical properties of cellulose. Biomacromolecules 15:4152–59
     [Google Scholar]
118. 118.  Ragauskas AJ, Beckham GT, Biddy MJ, Chandra R, Chen F et al. 2014. Lignin valorization: improving lignin processing in the biorefinery. Science 344:1246843
     [Google Scholar]
119. 119.  Rheinstädter MC, Das J, Flenner EJ, Brüning B, Seydel T, Kosztin I 2008. Motional coherence in fluid phospholipid membranes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101:248106
     [Google Scholar]
120. 120.  Rheinstädter MC, Häußler W, Salditt T 2006. Dispersion relation of lipid membrane shape fluctuations by neutron spin-echo spectrometry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97:048103
     [Google Scholar]
121. 121.  Rheinstädter MC, Ollinger C, Fragneto G, Demmel F, Salditt T 2004. Collective dynamics of lipid membranes studied by inelastic neutron scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93:108107
     [Google Scholar]
122. 122.  Riccardi D, Cui Q, Phillips GN 2010. Evaluating elastic network models of crystalline biological molecules with temperature factors, correlated motions, and diffuse X-ray scattering. Biophys. J. 99:2616–25
     [Google Scholar]
123. 123.  Róg T, Murzyn K, Hinsen K, Kneller GR 2003. nMoldyn: a program package for a neutron scattering oriented analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 24:657–67
     [Google Scholar]
124. 124.  Roh JH, Briber RM, Damjanovic A, Thirumalai D, Woodson SA, Sokolov AP 2009. Dynamics of tRNA at different levels of hydration. Biophys. J. 96:2755–62
     [Google Scholar]
125. 125.  Roh JH, Curtis JE, Azzam S, Novikov VN, Peral I et al. 2006. Influence of hydration on the dynamics of lysozyme. Biophys. J. 91:2573–88
     [Google Scholar]
126. 126.  Roh JH, Novikov VN, Gregory RB, Curtis JE, Chowdhuri Z, Sokolov AP 2005. Onsets of anharmonicity in protein dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95:038101
     [Google Scholar]
127. 127.  Rupley JA, Careri G 1991. Protein hydration and function. Adv. Protein Chem. 41:37–172
     [Google Scholar]
128. 128.  Russo D, Rea G, Lambreva MD, Haertlein M, Moulin M et al. 2016. Water collective dynamics in whole photosynthetic green algae as affected by protein single mutation. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7:2429–33
     [Google Scholar]
129. 129.  Schiró G, Caronna C, Natali F, Cupane A 2010. Direct evidence of the amino acid side chain and backbone contributions to protein anharmonicity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132:1371–76
     [Google Scholar]
130. 130.  Schirò G, Fichou Y, Gallat F-X, Wood K, Gabel F et al. 2015. Translational diffusion of hydration water correlates with functional motions in folded and intrinsically disordered proteins. Nat. Commun. 6:6490
     [Google Scholar]
131. 131.  Schiró G, Natali F, Cupane A 2012. Physical origin of anharmonic dynamics in proteins: new insights from resolution-dependent neutron scattering on homomeric polypeptides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109:128102
     [Google Scholar]
132. 132.  Schulz R, Lindner B, Petridis L, Smith JC 2009. Scaling of multimillion-atom biological molecular dynamics simulation on a petascale supercomputer. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 5:2798–808
     [Google Scholar]
133. 133.  Shaw DE, Bowers KJ, Chow E, Eastwood MP, Ierardi DJ et al. 2009. Millisecond-scale molecular dynamics simulations on Anton. Proc. Conf. High Perform. Comput. Netw. Storage Anal Portland, Nov:14–20 article 9
     [Google Scholar]
134. 134.  Smith J, Cusack S, Pezzeca U, Brooks B, Karplus M 1986. Inelastic neutron scattering analysis of low frequency motion in proteins: a normal mode study of the bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. J. Chem. Phys. 85:3636–54
     [Google Scholar]
135. 135.  Smith J, Cusack S, Tidor B, Karplus M 1990. Inelastic neutron scattering analysis of low-frequency motions in proteins: harmonic and damped harmonic models of bovine pancreatic tryspin inhibitor. J. Chem. Phys. 93:2974–91
     [Google Scholar]
136. 136.  Smith JC. 1991. Protein dynamics: comparison of simulations with inelastic neutron scattering experiments. Q. Rev. Biophys. 24:227–91
     [Google Scholar]
137. 137.  Smolin N, Biehl R, Kneller GR, Richter D, Smith JC 2012. Functional domain motions in proteins on the ∼1–100 ns timescale: comparison of neutron spin-echo spectroscopy of phosphoglycerate kinase with molecular-dynamics simulation. Biophys. J. 102:1108–17
     [Google Scholar]
138. 138.  Svergun D, Barberato C, Koch MHJ 1995. CRYSOL—a program to evaluate X-ray solution scattering of biological macromolecules from atomic coordinates. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 28:768–73
     [Google Scholar]
139. 139.  Swope WC, Pitera JW, Suits F 2004. Describing protein folding kinetics by molecular dynamics simulations. 1. Theory. J. Phys. Chem. B 108:6571–81
     [Google Scholar]
140. 140.  Tarek M, Tobias DJ 2002. Role of protein-water hydrogen bond dynamics in the protein dynamical transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88:138101
     [Google Scholar]
141. 141.  Tehei M, Franzetti B, Wood K, Gabel F, Fabiani E et al. 2007. Neutron scattering reveals extremely slow cell water in a Dead Sea organism. PNAS 104:766–71
     [Google Scholar]
142. 142.  Tidor B, Karplus M 1994. The contribution of vibrational entropy to molecular association: the dimerization of insulin. J. Mol. Biol. 238:405–14
     [Google Scholar]
143. 143.  Tournier AL, Smith JC 2003. Principal components of the protein dynamical transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91:208106
     [Google Scholar]
144. 144.  Tournier AL, Xu J, Smith JC 2003. Translational hydration water dynamics drives the protein glass transition. Biophys. J. 85:1871–75
     [Google Scholar]
145. 145.  Van Hove L 1954. Correlations in space and time and Born approximation scattering in systems of interacting particles. Phys. Rev. 95:249
     [Google Scholar]
146. 146.  Vitkup D, Ringe D, Petsko GA, Karplus M 2000. Solvent mobility and the protein'glass’ transition. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 7:34
     [Google Scholar]
147. 147.  Vural D, Hong L, Smith JC, Glyde HR 2013. Long-time mean-square displacements in proteins. Phys. Rev. E 88:052706
     [Google Scholar]
148. 148.  Vural D, Hong L, Smith JC, Glyde HR 2015. Motional displacements in proteins: the origin of wave-vector-dependent values. Phys. Rev. E 91:052705
     [Google Scholar]
149. 149.  Warshel A, Levitt M 1976. Theoretical studies of enzymic reactions: dielectric, electrostatic and steric stabilization of the carbonium ion in the reaction of lysozyme. J. Mol. Biol. 103:227–49
     [Google Scholar]
150. 150.  Wood K, Frölich A, Paciaroni A, Moulin M, Härtlein M et al. 2008. Coincidence of dynamical transitions in a soluble protein and its hydration water: direct measurements by neutron scattering and MD simulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130:4586–87
     [Google Scholar]
151. 151.  Wood K, Gallat F, Otten R, van Heel AJ, Lethier M et al. 2013. Protein surface and core dynamics show concerted hydration-dependent activation. Angew. Chem. 52:665–68
     [Google Scholar]
152. 152.  Wood K, Grudinin S, Kessler B, Weik M, Johnson M et al. 2008. Dynamical heterogeneity of specific amino acids in bacteriorhodopsin. J. Mol. Biol. 380:581–91
     [Google Scholar]
153. 153.  Wood K, Tobias DJ, Kessler B, Gabel F, Oesterhelt D et al. 2010. The low-temperature inflection observed in neutron scattering measurements of proteins is due to methyl rotation: direct evidence using isotope labeling and molecular dynamics simulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132:4990–91
     [Google Scholar]
154. 154.  Yang H, Luo G, Karnchanaphanurach P, Louie T-M, Rech I et al. 2003. Protein conformational dynamics probed by single-molecule electron transfer. Science 302:262–66
     [Google Scholar]
155. 155.  Yang S, Blachowicz L, Makowski L, Roux B 2010. Multidomain assembled states of Hck tyrosine kinase in solution. PNAS 107:15757–62
     [Google Scholar]
156. 156.  Yi Z, Lindner B, Prinz J-H, Noé F, Smith JC 2013. Dynamic neutron scattering from conformational dynamics. II. Application using molecular dynamics simulation and Markov modeling. J. Chem. Phys. 139:175102
     [Google Scholar]
157. 157.  Yi Z, Miao Y, Baudry J, Jain N, Smith JC 2012. Derivation of mean-square displacements for protein dynamics from elastic incoherent neutron scattering. J. Phys. Chem. B 116:5028–36
     [Google Scholar]
158. 158.  Zaccai G. 2000. How soft is a protein? A protein dynamics force constant measured by neutron scattering. Science 288:1604–7
     [Google Scholar]