Super-Resolution Microscopy for Structural Cell Biology

Literature Cited

1. 1.

   Altman RB, Terry DS, Zhou Z, Zheng Q, Geggier P et al. 2012. Cyanine fluorophore derivatives with enhanced photostability. Nat. Methods 9:68–71
   [Google Scholar]
2. 2.

   Annibale P, Vanni S, Scarselli M, Rothlisberger U, Radenovic A 2011. Quantitative photo activated localization microscopy: unraveling the effects of photoblinking. PLOS ONE 6:7e22678
   [Google Scholar]
3. 3.

   Aquino D, Schönle A, Geisler C, von Middendorff C, Wurm CA et al. 2011. Two-color nanoscopy of three-dimensional volumes by 4Pi detection of stochastically switched fluorophores. Nat. Methods 8:4353–59
   [Google Scholar]
4. 4.

   Babcock HP, Zhuang X. 2017. Analyzing single molecule localization microscopy data using cubic splines. Sci. Rep. 7:552
   [Google Scholar]
5. 5.

   Balinovic A, Albrecht D, Endesfelder U 2019. Spectrally red-shifted fluorescent fiducial markers for optimal drift correction in localization microscopy. J. Phys. D 52:204002
   [Google Scholar]
6. 6.

   Balzarotti F, Eilers Y, Gwosch KC, Gynnå AH, Westphal V et al. 2017. Nanometer resolution imaging and tracking of fluorescent molecules with minimal photon fluxes. Science 355:6325606–12
   [Google Scholar]
7. 7.

   Barasoain I, Díaz JF, Andreu JM. 2010. Fluorescent taxoid probes for microtubule research. Methods Cell Biol 95:353–72
   [Google Scholar]
8. 8.

   Barentine AES, Lin Y, Liu M, Kidd P, Balduf L et al. 2019. 3D multicolor nanoscopy at 10,000 cells a day. bioRxiv 606954. https://doi.org/10.1101/606954
   [Crossref]
9. 9.

   Bates M, Huang B, Dempsey GT, Zhuang X. 2007. Multicolor super-resolution imaging with photo-switchable fluorescent probes. Science 317:58451749–53
   [Google Scholar]
10. 10.

    Beghin A, Kechkar A, Butler C, Levet F, Cabillic M et al. 2017. Localization-based super-resolution imaging meets high-content screening. Nat. Methods 14:121184–90
    [Google Scholar]
11. 11.

    Beliu G, Kurz AJ, Kuhlemann AC, Behringer-Pliess L, Meub M et al. 2019. Bioorthogonal labeling with tetrazine-dyes for super-resolution microscopy. Commun. Biol. 2:261
    [Google Scholar]
12. 12.

    Benesch RE, Benesch R. 1953. Enzymatic removal of oxygen for polarography and related methods. Science 118:3068447–48
    [Google Scholar]
13. 13.

    Betzig E, Patterson GH, Sougrat R, Lindwasser OW, Olenych S et al. 2006. Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer resolution. Science 313:57931642–45
    [Google Scholar]
14. 14.

    Bock H, Geisler C, Wurm CA, von Middendorff C, Jakobs S et al. 2007. Two-color far-field fluorescence nanoscopy based on photoswitchable emitters. Appl. Phys. B 88:2161–65
    [Google Scholar]
15. 15.

    Bon P, Bourg N, Lécart S, Monneret S, Fort E et al. 2015. Three-dimensional nanometre localization of nanoparticles to enhance super-resolution microscopy. Nat. Commun. 6:7764
    [Google Scholar]
16. 16.

    Bon P, Linarès-Loyez J, Feyeux M, Alessandri K, Lounis B et al. 2018. Self-interference 3D super-resolution microscopy for deep tissue investigations. Nat. Methods 15:6449–54
    [Google Scholar]
17. 17.

    Bornens M. 2012. The centrosome in cells and organisms. Science 335:6067422–26
    [Google Scholar]
18. 18.

    Bossi M, Fölling J, Belov VN, Boyarskiy VP, Medda R et al. 2008. Multicolor far-field fluorescence nanoscopy through isolated detection of distinct molecular species. Nano Lett 8:82463–68
    [Google Scholar]
19. 19.

    Bourg N, Mayet C, Dupuis G, Barroca T, Bon P et al. 2015. Direct optical nanoscopy with axially localized detection. Nat. Photon. 9:9587–93
    [Google Scholar]
20. 20.

    Bowler M, Kong D, Sun S, Nanjundappa R, Evans L et al. 2019. High-resolution characterization of centriole distal appendage morphology and dynamics by correlative STORM and electron microscopy. Nat. Commun. 10:993
    [Google Scholar]
21. 21.

    Briggs JA. 2013. Structural biology in situ—the potential of subtomogram averaging. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 23:2261–67
    [Google Scholar]
22. 22.

    Broeken J, Johnson H, Lidke DS, Liu S, Nieuwenhuizen RPJ et al. 2015. Resolution improvement by 3D particle averaging in localization microscopy. Methods Appl. Fluoresc. 3:1014003
    [Google Scholar]
23. 23.

    Carrington G, Tomlinson D, Peckham M. 2019. Exploiting nanobodies and affimers for superresolution imaging in light microscopy. Mol. Biol. Cell 30:222737–40
    [Google Scholar]
24. 24.

    Cheng Y, Grigorieff N, Penczek PA, Walz T. 2015. A primer to single-particle cryo-electron microscopy. Cell 161:3438–49
    [Google Scholar]
25. 25.

    Cnossen J, Cui TJ, Joo C, Smith C 2021. Drift correction in localization microscopy using entropy minimization. Opt. Express 29:1827961–74
    [Google Scholar]
26. 26.

    Cnossen J, Hinsdale T, Thorsen RØ, Siemons M, Schueder F et al. 2020. Localization microscopy at doubled precision with patterned illumination. Nat. Methods 17:59–63
    [Google Scholar]
27. 27.

    Coelho S, Baek J, Graus MS, Halstead JM, Nicovich PR et al. 2020. Ultraprecise single-molecule localization microscopy enables in situ distance measurements in intact cells. Sci. Adv. 6:16eaay8271
    [Google Scholar]
28. 28.

    Coelho S, Baek J, Walsh J, Gooding JJ, Gaus K. 2021. 3D active stabilization for single-molecule imaging. Nat. Protoc. 16:497–515
    [Google Scholar]
29. 29.

    Dahlberg PD, Moerner WE. 2021. Cryogenic super-resolution fluorescence and electron microscopy correlated at the nanoscale. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 72:253–78
    [Google Scholar]
30. 30.

    Dasgupta A, Deschamps J, Matti U, Hübner U, Becker J et al. 2021. Direct supercritical angle localization microscopy for nanometer 3D superresolution. Nat. Commun. 12:1180
    [Google Scholar]
31. 31.

    Dempsey GT, Vaughan JC, Chen KH, Bates M, Zhuang X. 2011. Evaluation of fluorophores for optimal performance in localization-based super-resolution imaging. Nat. Methods 8:121027–36
    [Google Scholar]
32. 32.

    Deschamps J, Mund M, Ries J. 2014. 3D superresolution microscopy by supercritical angle detection. Opt. Express 22:2329081–91
    [Google Scholar]
33. 33.

    Deschamps J, Rowald A, Ries J 2016. Efficient homogeneous illumination and optical sectioning for quantitative single-molecule localization microscopy. Opt. Express 24:2428080–90
    [Google Scholar]
34. 34.

    Diekmann R, Kahnwald M, Schoenit A, Deschamps J, Matti U, Ries J 2020. Optimizing imaging speed and excitation intensity for single-molecule localization microscopy. Nat. Methods 17:9909–12
    [Google Scholar]
35. 35.

    Douglass KM, Sieben C, Archetti A, Lambert A, Manley S 2016. Super-resolution imaging of multiple cells by optimized flat-field epi-illumination. Nat. Photon. 10:11705–8
    [Google Scholar]
36. 36.

    Durisic N, Laparra-Cuervo L, Sandoval-Álvarez Á, Borbely JS, Lakadamyali M. 2014. Single-molecule evaluation of fluorescent protein photoactivation efficiency using an in vivo nanotemplate. Nat. Methods 11:2156–62
    [Google Scholar]
37. 37.

    Eilers Y, Ta H, Gwosch KC, Balzarotti F, Hell SW. 2018. MINFLUX monitors rapid molecular jumps with superior spatiotemporal resolution. PNAS 115:246117–22
    [Google Scholar]
38. 38.

    Fernández-Suárez M, Ting AY. 2008. Fluorescent probes for super-resolution imaging in living cells. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9:12929–43
    [Google Scholar]
39. 39.

    Finan K, Raulf A, Heilemann M 2015. A set of homo-oligomeric standards allows accurate protein counting. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54:4112049–52
    [Google Scholar]
40. 40.

    Früh SM, Matti U, Spycher PR, Rubini M, Lickert S et al. 2021. Site-specifically-labeled antibodies for super-resolution microscopy reveal in situ linkage errors. ACS Nano 15:712161–70Quantification of linkage error in SMLM.
    [Google Scholar]
41. 41.

    Früh SM, Schoen I, Ries J, Vogel V 2015. Molecular architecture of native fibronectin fibrils. Nat. Commun. 6:7275
    [Google Scholar]
42. 42.

    Gautier A, Juillerat A, Heinis C, Corrêa IR, Kindermann M et al. 2008. An engineered protein tag for multiprotein labeling in living cells. Chem. Biol. 15:2128–36
    [Google Scholar]
43. 43.

    Goodsell DS, Autin L, Olson AJ 2019. Illustrate: software for biomolecular illustration. Structure 27:111716–20.e1
    [Google Scholar]
44. 44.

    Götzke H, Kilisch M, Martínez-Carranza M, Sograte-Idrissi S, Rajavel A et al. 2019. The ALFA-tag is a highly versatile tool for nanobody-based bioscience applications. Nat. Commun. 10:4403
    [Google Scholar]
45. 45.

    Grimm JB, English BP, Chen J, Slaughter JP, Zhang Z et al. 2015. A general method to improve fluorophores for live-cell and single-molecule microscopy. Nat. Methods 12:3244–50
    [Google Scholar]
46. 46.

    Grimm JB, English BP, Choi H, Muthusamy AK, Mehl BP et al. 2016. Bright photoactivatable fluorophores for single-molecule imaging. Nat. Methods 13:12985–88
    [Google Scholar]
47. 47.

    Gu L, Li Y, Zhang S, Xue Y, Li W et al. 2019. Molecular resolution imaging by repetitive optical selective exposure. Nat. Methods 16:111114–18
    [Google Scholar]
48. 48.

    Gu L, Li Y, Zhang S, Zhou M, Xue Y et al. 2021. Molecular-scale axial localization by repetitive optical selective exposure. . Nat. Methods 18:4369–73Demonstrated that ROSE-z achieves comparable performance with 4Pi-SMLM using axially modulated illumination.
    [Google Scholar]
49. 49.

    Gwosch KC, Pape JK, Balzarotti F, Hoess P, Ellenberg J et al. 2020. MINFLUX nanoscopy delivers 3D multicolor nanometer resolution in cells. Nat. Methods 17:2217–24Extension of MINFLUX to large FoVs and to 3D, dual-color, and live cells.
    [Google Scholar]
50. 50.

    Hajj B, Wisniewski J, Beheiry ME, Chen J, Revyakin A et al. 2014. Whole-cell, multicolor superresolution imaging using volumetric multifocus microscopy. PNAS 111:4917480–85
    [Google Scholar]
51. 51.

    Hauser M, Wojcik M, Kim D, Mahmoudi M, Li W, Xu K. 2017. Correlative super-resolution microscopy: new dimensions and new opportunities. Chem. Rev. 117:117428–56
    [Google Scholar]
52. 52.

    Heilemann M, vandeLinde S, Schüttpelz M, Kasper R, Seefeldt B et al. 2008. Subdiffraction-resolution fluorescence imaging with conventional fluorescent probes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47:336172–76Established dSTORM as an experimentally simpler version of STORM.
    [Google Scholar]
53. 53.

    Hess ST, Girirajan TPK, Mason MD. 2006. Ultra-high resolution imaging by fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy. Biophys. J. 91:114258–72
    [Google Scholar]
54. 54.

    Heydarian H, Joosten M, Przybylski A, Schueder F, Jungmann R et al. 2021. 3D particle averaging and detection of macromolecular symmetry in localization microscopy. Nat. Commun. 12:2847Template-free 3D particle averaging for SMLM.
    [Google Scholar]
55. 55.

    Heydarian H, Schueder F, Strauss MT, van Werkhoven B, Fazel M et al. 2018. Template-free 2D particle fusion in localization microscopy. Nat. Methods 15:10781–84
    [Google Scholar]
56. 56.

    Hoess P, Mund M, Reitberger M, Ries J 2018. Dual-color and 3D super-resolution microscopy of multi-protein assemblies. Methods Mol. Biol. 1764:237–51
    [Google Scholar]
57. 57.

    Hoffman DP, Shtengel G, Xu CS, Campbell KR, Freeman M et al. 2020. Correlative three-dimensional super-resolution and block-face electron microscopy of whole vitreously frozen cells. Science 367:6475eaaz5357
    [Google Scholar]
58. 58.

    Holden SJ, Pengo T, Meibom KL, Fernandez CF, Collier J, Manley S. 2014. High throughput 3D super-resolution microscopy reveals Caulobacter crescentus in vivo Z-ring organization. PNAS 111:124566–71
    [Google Scholar]
59. 59.

    Holden SJ, Uphoff S, Kapanidis AN 2011. DAOSTORM: an algorithm for high-density super-resolution microscopy. Nat. Methods 8:4279–80
    [Google Scholar]
60. 60.

    Huang B, Wang W, Bates M, Zhuang X. 2008. Three-dimensional super-resolution imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy. Science 319:5864810–13
    [Google Scholar]
61. 61.

    Huang F, Hartwich TMP, Rivera-Molina FE, Lin Y, Duim WC et al. 2013. Video-rate nanoscopy using sCMOS camera-specific single-molecule localization algorithms. Nat. Methods 10:7653–58
    [Google Scholar]
62. 62.

    Huang F, Schwartz SL, Byars JM, Lidke KA. 2011. Simultaneous multiple-emitter fitting for single molecule super-resolution imaging. Biomed. Opt. Express 2:51377–93
    [Google Scholar]
63. 63.

    Huang F, Sirinakis G, Allgeyer ES, Schroeder LK, Duim WC et al. 2016. Ultra-high resolution 3D imaging of whole cells. Cell 166:41028–403D whole-cell imaging at 10 nm resolution using 4Pi-SMLM.
    [Google Scholar]
64. 64.

    Huhle A, Klaue D, Brutzer H, Daldrop P, Joo S et al. 2015. Camera-based three-dimensional real-time particle tracking at kHz rates and Ångström accuracy. Nat. Commun. 6:5885
    [Google Scholar]
65. 65.

    Hurlock ME, Čavka I, Kursel LE, Haversat J, Wooten M et al. 2020. Identification of novel synaptonemal complex components in C. elegans. J. Cell Biol. 219:5e20190043
    [Google Scholar]
66. 66.

    Isselstein M, Zhang L, Glembockyte V, Brix O, Cosa G et al. 2020. Self-healing dyes—keeping the promise?. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11:114462–80
    [Google Scholar]
67. 67.

    Jimenez Sabinina V, Hossain MJ, Hériché J-K, Hoess P, Nijmeijer B et al. 2021. Three-dimensional superresolution fluorescence microscopy maps the variable molecular architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Mol. Biol. Cell 32:171523–33
    [Google Scholar]
68. 68.

    Jouchet P, Cabriel C, Bourg N, Bardou M, Poüs C et al. 2021. Nanometric axial localization of single fluorescent molecules with modulated excitation. Nat. Photon. 15:297–304
    [Google Scholar]
69. 69.

    Juette MF, Gould TJ, Lessard MD, Mlodzianoski MJ, Nagpure BS et al. 2008. Three-dimensional sub-100 nm resolution fluorescence microscopy of thick samples. Nat. Methods 5:6527–29
    [Google Scholar]
70. 70.

    Jungmann R, Avendaño MS, Dai M, Woehrstein JB, Agasti SS et al. 2016. Quantitative super-resolution imaging with qPAINT. Nat. Methods 13:5439–42
    [Google Scholar]
71. 71.

    Jungmann R, Avendaño MS, Woehrstein JB, Dai M, Shih WM, Yin P 2014. Multiplexed 3D cellular super-resolution imaging with DNA-PAINT and Exchange-PAINT. Nat. Methods 11:3313–18Established DNA-PAINT and the corresponding multiplexing.
    [Google Scholar]
72. 72.

    Kanchanawong P, Shtengel G, Pasapera AM, Ramko EB, Davidson MW et al. 2010. Nanoscale architecture of integrin-based cell adhesions. Nature 468:7323580–84
    [Google Scholar]
73. 73.

    Keppler A, Gendreizig S, Gronemeyer T, Pick H, Vogel H, Johnsson K. 2003. A general method for the covalent labeling of fusion proteins with small molecules in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 21:186–89
    [Google Scholar]
74. 74.

    Kim D, Deerinck TJ, Sigal YM, Babcock HP, Ellisman MH, Zhuang X. 2015. Correlative stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy and electron microscopy. PLOS ONE 10:4e0124581
    [Google Scholar]
75. 75.

    Klehs K, Spahn C, Endesfelder U, Lee SF, Fürstenberg A, Heilemann M 2014. Increasing the brightness of cyanine fluorophores for single-molecule and superresolution imaging. Chem. Phys. Chem. 15:4637–41
    [Google Scholar]
76. 76.

    Köhler S, Wojcik M, Xu K, Dernburg AF. 2017. Superresolution microscopy reveals the three-dimensional organization of meiotic chromosome axes in intact Caenorhabditis elegans tissue. PNAS 114:24E4734–43
    [Google Scholar]
77. 77.

    Kopek BG, Paez-Segala MG, Shtengel G, Sochacki KA, Sun MG et al. 2017. Diverse protocols for correlative super-resolution fluorescence imaging and electron microscopy of chemically fixed samples. Nat. Protoc. 12:5916–46
    [Google Scholar]
78. 78.

    Laplante C, Huang F, Tebbs IR, Bewersdorf J, Pollard TD. 2016. Molecular organization of cytokinesis nodes and contractile rings by super-resolution fluorescence microscopy of live fission yeast. PNAS 113:40E5876–85
    [Google Scholar]
79. 79.

    Lardon N, Wang L, Tschanz A, Hoess P, Tran M et al. 2021. Systematic tuning of rhodamine spirocyclization for super-resolution microscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc 143:3614592–600
    [Google Scholar]
80. 80.

    Lee SF, Vérolet Q, Fürstenberg A. 2013. Improved super-resolution microscopy with oxazine fluorophores in heavy water. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52:348948–51
    [Google Scholar]
81. 81.

    Lee S-H, Shin JY, Lee A, Bustamante C. 2012. Counting single photoactivatable fluorescent molecules by photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM). PNAS 109:4317436–41
    [Google Scholar]
82. 82.

    Lelek M, Gyparaki MT, Beliu G, Schueder F, Griffié J et al. 2021. Single-molecule localization microscopy. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 1:39
    [Google Scholar]
83. 83.

    Li Y, Mund M, Hoess P, Deschamps J, Matti U et al. 2018. Real-time 3D single-molecule localization using experimental point spread functions. Nat. Methods 15:5367–69
    [Google Scholar]
84. 84.

    Lin Y, Long JJ, Huang F, Duim WC, Kirschbaum S et al. 2015. Quantifying and optimizing single-molecule switching nanoscopy at high speeds. PLOS ONE 10:5e0128135
    [Google Scholar]
85. 85.

    Liu S, Huang F. 2020. Enhanced 4Pi single-molecule localization microscopy with coherent pupil based localization. Commun. Biol. 3:220
    [Google Scholar]
86. 86.

    Los GV, Encell LP, McDougall MG, Hartzell DD, Karassina N et al. 2008. HaloTag: a novel protein labeling technology for cell imaging and protein analysis. ACS Chem. Biol. 3:6373–82
    [Google Scholar]
87. 87.

    Löschberger A, Franke C, Krohne G, van de Linde S, Sauer M. 2014. Correlative super-resolution fluorescence and electron microscopy of the nuclear pore complex with molecular resolution. J. Cell Sci. 127:204351–55
    [Google Scholar]
88. 88.

    Löschberger A, van de Linde S, Dabauvalle M-C, Rieger B, Heilemann M et al. 2012. Super-resolution imaging visualizes the eightfold symmetry of gp210 proteins around the nuclear pore complex and resolves the central channel with nanometer resolution. J. Cell Sci. 125:3570–75
    [Google Scholar]
89. 89.

    McEvoy AL, Hoi H, Bates M, Platonova E, Cranfill PJ et al. 2012. mMaple: a photoconvertible fluorescent protein for use in multiple imaging modalities. PLOS ONE 7:12e51314
    [Google Scholar]
90. 90.

    McGorty R, Kamiyama D, Huang B. 2013. Active microscope stabilization in three dimensions using image correlation. Opt. Nanosc. 2:110
    [Google Scholar]
91. 91.

    Mlodzianoski MJ, Schreiner JM, Callahan SP, Smolková K, Dlasková A et al. 2011. Sample drift correction in 3D fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy. Opt. Express 19:1615009–19
    [Google Scholar]
92. 92.

    Möckl L, Moerner WE. 2020. Super-resolution microscopy with single molecules in biology and beyond: essentials, current trends, and future challenges. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142:4217828–44
    [Google Scholar]
93. 93.

    M'Saad O, Bewersdorf J. 2020. Light microscopy of proteins in their ultrastructural context. Nat. Commun. 11:3850
    [Google Scholar]
94. 94.

    Mund M, van der Beek JA, Deschamps J, Dmitrieff S, Hoess P et al. 2018. Systematic nanoscale analysis of endocytosis links efficient vesicle formation to patterned actin nucleation. Cell 174:4884–96.e17Protein organization and assembly at endocytic sites in yeast cells using particle averaging and dynamic reconstruction.
    [Google Scholar]
95. 95.

    Nehme E, Freedman D, Gordon R, Ferdman B, Weiss LE et al. 2020. DeepSTORM3D: dense 3D localization microscopy and PSF design by deep learning. Nat. Methods 17:734–40
    [Google Scholar]
96. 96.

    Nieuwenhuizen RPJ, Bates M, Szymborska A, Lidke KA, Rieger B, Stallinga S 2015. Quantitative localization microscopy: effects of photophysics and labeling stoichiometry. PLOS ONE 10:5e0127989
    [Google Scholar]
97. 97.

    Olivier N, Keller D, Gönczy P, Manley S 2013. Resolution doubling in 3D-STORM imaging through improved buffers. PLOS ONE 8:7e69004
    [Google Scholar]
98. 98.

    Ong WQ, Citron YR, Schnitzbauer J, Kamiyama D, Huang B. 2015. Heavy water: a simple solution to increasing the brightness of fluorescent proteins in super-resolution imaging. Chem. Commun. 51:7013451–53
    [Google Scholar]
99. 99.

    Opazo F, Levy M, Byrom M, Schäfer C, Geisler C et al. 2012. Aptamers as potential tools for super-resolution microscopy. Nat. Methods 9:10938–39
    [Google Scholar]
100. 100.

     Pape JK, Stephan T, Balzarotti F, Büchner R, Lange F et al. 2020. Multicolor 3D MINFLUX nanoscopy of mitochondrial MICOS proteins. PNAS 117:3420607–14
     [Google Scholar]
101. 101.

     Pavani SRP, Thompson MA, Biteen JS, Lord SJ, Liu N et al. 2009. Three-dimensional, single-molecule fluorescence imaging beyond the diffraction limit by using a double-helix point spread function. PNAS 106:92995–99
     [Google Scholar]
102. 102.

     Pertsinidis A, Zhang Y, Chu S 2010. Subnanometre single-molecule localization, registration and distance measurements. Nature 466:7306647–51
     [Google Scholar]
103. 103.

     Puchner EM, Walter JM, Kasper R, Huang B, Lim WA. 2013. Counting molecules in single organelles with superresolution microscopy allows tracking of the endosome maturation trajectory. PNAS 110:4016015–20
     [Google Scholar]
104. 104.

     Punjani A, Rubinstein JL, Fleet DJ, Brubaker MA. 2017. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14:3290–96
     [Google Scholar]
105. 105.

     Reymond L, Huser T, Ruprecht V, Wieser S. 2020. Modulation-enhanced localization microscopy. J. Phys. Photon. 2:4041001
     [Google Scholar]
106. 106.

     Reymond L, Ziegler J, Knapp C, Wang F-C, Huser TR et al. 2019. SIMPLE: structured illumination based point localization estimator with enhanced precision. Opt. Express 27:1724578–90
     [Google Scholar]
107. 107.

     Ries J, Kaplan C, Platonova E, Eghlidi H, Ewers H. 2012. A simple, versatile method for GFP-based super-resolution microscopy via nanobodies. Nat. Methods 9:6582–84
     [Google Scholar]
108. 108.

     Rollins GC, Shin JY, Bustamante C, Pressé S. 2015. Stochastic approach to the molecular counting problem in superresolution microscopy. PNAS 112:2E110–18
     [Google Scholar]
109. 109.

     Ruckstuhl T, Verdes D. 2004. Supercritical angle fluorescence (SAF) microscopy. Opt. Express 12:184246–54
     [Google Scholar]
110. 110.

     Rust MJ, Bates M, Zhuang X. 2006. Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM). Nat. Methods 3:10793–96
     [Google Scholar]
111. 111.

     Schlichthaerle T, Eklund AS, Schueder F, Strauss MT, Tiede C et al. 2018. Site-specific labeling of affimers for DNA-PAINT microscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57:3411060–63
     [Google Scholar]
112. 112.

     Schmidt R, Weihs T, Wurm CA, Jansen I, Rehman J et al. 2021. MINFLUX nanometer-scale 3D imaging and microsecond-range tracking on a common fluorescence microscope. Nat. Commun. 12:1478
     [Google Scholar]
113. 113.

     Schnitzbauer J, Strauss MT, Schlichthaerle T, Schueder F, Jungmann R. 2017. Super-resolution microscopy with DNA-PAINT. Nat. Protoc. 12:61198–228
     [Google Scholar]
114. 114.

     Schnitzbauer J, Wang Y, Zhao S, Bakalar M, Nuwal T et al. 2018. Correlation analysis framework for localization-based superresolution microscopy. PNAS 115:33219–24
     [Google Scholar]
115. 115.

     Sharonov A, Hochstrasser RM. 2006. Wide-field subdiffraction imaging by accumulated binding of diffusing probes. PNAS 103:5018911–16
     [Google Scholar]
116. 116.

     Shechtman Y, Weiss LE, Backer AS, Sahl SJ, Moerner WE. 2015. Precise three-dimensional scan-free multiple-particle tracking over large axial ranges with tetrapod point spread functions. Nano Lett 15:64194–99
     [Google Scholar]
117. 117.

     Shi X, Garcia G, Van De Weghe JC, McGorty R, Pazour GJ et al. 2017. Super-resolution microscopy reveals that disruption of ciliary transition-zone architecture causes Joubert syndrome. Nat. Cell Biol. 19:101178–88
     [Google Scholar]
118. 118.

     Shroff H, Galbraith CG, Galbraith JA, White H, Gillette JM et al. 2007. Dual-color superresolution imaging of genetically expressed probes within individual adhesion complexes. PNAS 104:5120308–13
     [Google Scholar]
119. 119.

     Shtengel G, Galbraith JA, Galbraith CG, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Gillette JM et al. 2009. Interferometric fluorescent super-resolution microscopy resolves 3D cellular ultrastructure. PNAS 106:93125–30
     [Google Scholar]
120. 120.

     Sieben C, Banterle N, Douglass KM, Gönczy P, Manley S 2018. Multicolor single-particle reconstruction of protein complexes. Nat. Methods 15:10777–80
     [Google Scholar]
121. 121.

     Sillibourne JE, Specht CG, Izeddin I, Hurbain I, Tran P et al. 2011. Assessing the localization of centrosomal proteins by PALM/STORM nanoscopy. Cytoskeleton 68:11619–27
     [Google Scholar]
122. 122.

     Sochacki KA, Dickey AM, Strub M-P, Taraska JW. 2017. Endocytic proteins are partitioned at the edge of the clathrin lattice in mammalian cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 19:4352–61
     [Google Scholar]
123. 123.

     Speiser A, Müller L-R, Hoess P, Matti U, Obara CJ et al. 2021. Deep learning enables fast and dense single-molecule localization with high accuracy. Nat. Methods 18:1082–90
     [Google Scholar]
124. 124.

     Stehr F, Stein J, Schueder F, Schwille P, Jungmann R. 2019. Flat-top TIRF illumination boosts DNA-PAINT imaging and quantification. Nat. Commun. 10:1268
     [Google Scholar]
125. 125.

     Szymborska A, de Marco A, Daigle N, Cordes VC, Briggs JAG, Ellenberg J. 2013. Nuclear pore scaffold structure analyzed by super-resolution microscopy and particle averaging. Science 341:6146655–58
     [Google Scholar]
126. 126.

     Takakura H, Zhang Y, Erdmann RS, Thompson AD, Lin Y et al. 2017. Long time-lapse nanoscopy with spontaneously blinking membrane probes. Nat. Biotechnol. 35:8773–80
     [Google Scholar]
127. 127.

     Tam J, Cordier GA, Borbely JS, Álvarez ÁS, Lakadamyali M. 2014. Cross-talk-free multi-color STORM imaging using a single fluorophore. PLOS ONE 9:7e101772
     [Google Scholar]
128. 128.

     Testa I, Wurm CA, Medda R, Rothermel E, von Middendorff C et al. 2010. Multicolor fluorescence nanoscopy in fixed and living cells by exciting conventional fluorophores with a single wavelength. Biophys. J. 99:82686–94
     [Google Scholar]
129. 129.

     Thevathasan JV, Kahnwald M, Cieśliński K, Hoess P, Peneti SK et al. 2019. Nuclear pores as versatile reference standards for quantitative superresolution microscopy. Nat. Methods 16:101045–53Introduced NPC cell lines as a reference standard for resolution, counting, and labeling in SMLM.
     [Google Scholar]
130. 130.

     Traenkle B, Rothbauer U. 2017. Under the microscope: single-domain antibodies for live-cell imaging and super-resolution microscopy. Front. Immunol. 8:1030
     [Google Scholar]
131. 131.

     Turkowyd B, Balinovic A, Virant D, Carnero HGG, Caldana F et al. 2017. A general mechanism of photoconversion of green-to-red fluorescent proteins based on blue and infrared light reduces phototoxicity in live-cell single-molecule imaging. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56:3811634–39
     [Google Scholar]
132. 132.

     Uno S, Kamiya M, Yoshihara T, Sugawara K, Okabe K et al. 2014. A spontaneously blinking fluorophore based on intramolecular spirocyclization for live-cell super-resolution imaging. Nat. Chem. 6:8681–89
     [Google Scholar]
133. 133.

     Uttamapinant C, Howe JD, Lang K, Beránek V, Davis L et al. 2015. Genetic code expansion enables live-cell and super-resolution imaging of site-specifically labeled cellular proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137:144602–5
     [Google Scholar]
134. 134.

     Valley CC, Liu S, Lidke DS, Lidke KA. 2015. Sequential superresolution imaging of multiple targets using a single fluorophore. PLOS ONE 10:4e0123941
     [Google Scholar]
135. 135.

     Vicidomini G, Bianchini P, Diaspro A. 2018. STED super-resolved microscopy. Nat. Methods 15:3173–82
     [Google Scholar]
136. 136.

     Virant D, Traenkle B, Maier J, Kaiser PD, Bodenhöfer M et al. 2018. A peptide tag-specific nanobody enables high-quality labeling for dSTORM imaging. Nat. Commun. 9:930
     [Google Scholar]
137. 137.

     Virant D, Turkowyd B, Balinovic A, Endesfelder U. 2017. Combining primed photoconversion and UV-photoactivation for aberration-free, live-cell compliant multi-color single-molecule localization microscopy imaging. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18:71524
     [Google Scholar]
138. 138.

     Vogelsang J, Kasper R, Steinhauer C, Person B, Heilemann M et al. 2008. A reducing and oxidizing system minimizes photobleaching and blinking of fluorescent dyes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47:295465–69
     [Google Scholar]
139. 139.

     von Appen A, Kosinski J, Sparks L, Ori A, DiGuilio AL et al. 2015. In situ structural analysis of the human nuclear pore complex. Nature 526:7571140–43
140. 140.

     Wang J, Allgeyer ES, Sirinakis G, Zhang Y, Hu K et al. 2021. Implementation of a 4Pi-SMS super-resolution microscope. Nat. Protoc. 16:2677–727
     [Google Scholar]
141. 141.

     Wang L, Frei MS, Salim A, Johnsson K 2019. Small-molecule fluorescent probes for live-cell super-resolution microscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141:72770–81
     [Google Scholar]
142. 142.

     Wang Y, Schnitzbauer J, Hu Z, Li X, Cheng Y et al. 2014. Localization events-based sample drift correction for localization microscopy with redundant cross-correlation algorithm. Opt. Express 22:1315982–91
     [Google Scholar]
143. 143.

     Wassie AT, Zhao Y, Boyden ES. 2018. Expansion microscopy: principles and uses in biological research. Nat. Methods 16:133–41
     [Google Scholar]
144. 144.

     Weisenburger S, Boening D, Schomburg B, Giller K, Becker S et al. 2017. Cryogenic optical localization provides 3D protein structure data with Angstrom resolution. Nat. Methods 14:2141–44
     [Google Scholar]
145. 145.

     Wu Y-L, Hoess P, Tschanz A, Matti U, Mund M, Ries J 2021. Maximum-likelihood model fitting for quantitative analysis of SMLM data. bioRxiv 2021.08.30.456756. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.30.456756
     [Crossref]
146. 146.

     Wu Y-L, Tschanz A, Krupnik L, Ries J. 2020. Quantitative data analysis in single-molecule localization microscopy. Trends Cell Biol 30:11837–51
     [Google Scholar]
147. 147.

     Wulf E, Deboben A, Bautz FA, Faulstich H, Wieland T. 1979. Fluorescent phallotoxin, a tool for the visualization of cellular actin. PNAS 76:94498–502
     [Google Scholar]
148. 148.

     Xu K, Zhong G, Zhuang X 2013. Actin, spectrin, and associated proteins form a periodic cytoskeletal structure in axons. Science 339:6118452–56Discovered the periodic organization of actin and spectrin in axons using dual-objective SMLM.
     [Google Scholar]
149. 149.

     Zanacchi FC, Manzo C, Alvarez AS, Derr ND, Garcia-Parajo MF, Lakadamyali M. 2017. A DNA origami platform for quantifying protein copy number in super-resolution. Nat. Methods 14:8789–92
     [Google Scholar]
150. 150.

     Zhang M, Chang H, Zhang Y, Yu J, Wu L et al. 2012. Rational design of true monomeric and bright photoactivatable fluorescent proteins. Nat. Methods 9:7727–29
     [Google Scholar]
151. 151.

     Zhang Y, Schroeder LK, Lessard MD, Kidd P, Chung J et al. 2020. Nanoscale subcellular architecture revealed by multicolor three-dimensional salvaged fluorescence imaging. Nat. Methods 17:2225–31
     [Google Scholar]
152. 152.

     Zhao T, Wang Y, Zhai Y, Qu X, Cheng A et al. 2015. A user-friendly two-color super-resolution localization microscope. Opt. Express 23:21879–87
     [Google Scholar]
153. 153.

     Zhu L, Zhang W, Elnatan D, Huang B. 2012. Faster STORM using compressed sensing. Nat. Methods 9:7721–23
     [Google Scholar]
154. 154.

     Zwettler FU, Reinhard S, Gambarotto D, Bell TDM, Hamel V et al. 2020. Molecular resolution imaging by post-labeling expansion single-molecule localization microscopy (Ex-SMLM). Nat. Commun. 11:3388
     [Google Scholar]