Plea Bargaining, Conviction Without Trial, and the Global Administratization of Criminal Convictions

Literature Cited

1. Abrams DS. 2011. Is pleading really a bargain?. J. Empir. Leg. Stud. 8:200–21
   [Google Scholar]
2. Abrams DS. 2013. Putting the trial penalty on trial. Duquesne Law Rev 51:777–85
   [Google Scholar]
3. Aebi MF, Akdeniz G, Barclay G, Campistol C, Caneppele S et al. 2017. European Sourcebook of Crime and Criminal Justice Statistics 2014 Helsinki, Finl: Acad. Bookst, 5th ed.., 2nd rev. print .
4. Alschuler AW. 1968. The prosecutor's role in the plea bargaining. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 36:50–112
   [Google Scholar]
5. Altenhain K, Dietmeier F, May M 2013. Die Praxis der Absprachen in Strafverfahren Baden-Baden, Ger: Nomos
6. Altenhain K, Hagemeier I, Haimerl M, Stammen K 2007. Die Praxis der Absprachen in Wirtschafstrafverfahren Baden-Baden, Ger: Nomos
7. Ancelot L, Doriat-Duban M. 2010. La procedure de comparution sur reconnaissance préalable de culpabilité: l'éclairage de l'économie du droit sur l'équité du plaider coupable. Arch. Politique Crim. 32:269–87
   [Google Scholar]
8. Ashworth A, Roberts JV. 2013. The origins and nature of the sentencing guidelines in England and Wales. In Sentencing Guidelines. Exploring the English Model A Ashworth, JV Roberts 1–12 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bachmaier L. 2018. The European Court of Human Rights on negotiated justice and coercion. Eur. J. Crime Crim. Law Crim. Justice 26:236–59
   [Google Scholar]
10. Baldwin J, McConville M. 1977. Negotiated Justice: Pressures to Plead Guilty London: Martin Robertson
11. Baldwin J, McConville M. 1979. Plea bargaining and plea negotiation in England. Law Soc. Rev. 13:287–307
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bandyopadhyay S, McCannon BC. 2014. The effect of the election of prosecutors on criminal trials. Public Choice 161:141–56
    [Google Scholar]
13. Barkow R. 2006. Separation of powers and the criminal law. Stanford Law Rev 58:989–1054
    [Google Scholar]
14. Beard J. 2017. Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea Brief. Pap. 5974, House Commons Libr London:
15. Bergman M, Fondevila G, Langer M 2017. ¿A quién y cómo se juzga en la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires? Una radiografía de la Justicia Nacional en lo Criminal y Correccional Buenos Aires: UNTREF
16. Bonta J, Harris H, Zinger I, Carriere D 1996. The Crown Files Research Project: A Study of Dangerous Offenders Ottawa: Solicit. Gen. Can.
17. Brook CA, Fiannaca B, Harvey D, Marcus P, McEwan J, Pomerance R 2016. A comparative look at plea bargaining in Australia, Canada, England, New Zealand, and the United States. William Mary Law Rev 57:1147–224
    [Google Scholar]
18. Bushway S, Redlich A, Norris R 2014. An explicit test of plea bargaining in the “shadow of the trial. .” Criminology 52:723–54
    [Google Scholar]
19. Carlson KB. 2018. Trading on guilt: the judicial logic of plea bargains at the ICTY and its transplant to Serbia and Bosnia. International Practices of Criminal Justice: Social and Legal Perspectives MJ Christensen, R Levi 131–48 New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
20. Cheng KK. 2013. Pressures to plead guilty: factors affecting plea decisions in Hong Kong's Magistrates’ Court. Brit. J. Criminol. 53:257–75
    [Google Scholar]
21. Cheng KK. 2016. Public approval of plea bargaining in Hong Kong: the effects of offender characteristics. Int. Crim. Justice Rev. 26:31–48
    [Google Scholar]
22. Cheng KK, Chui WH, Young SNM, Ong R 2018. Why do criminal trials “crack”? An empirical investigation of late guilty pleas in Hong Kong. Asian J. Comp. Law 13:1–25
    [Google Scholar]
23. Ciocchini P. 2018. Reformers’ unfulfilled promises: accountability deficits in Argentinean criminal courts. Int. J. Law Context 14:22–42
    [Google Scholar]
24. Coalit. Indep. Transpar. Judic. 2013. Application of Plea Bargaining in Georgia Tbilisi, Georgia: Coalit. Indep. Transpar. Judic http://ewmi-prolog.org/images/files/3902Coalition_Criminal_Law_WG_Research_ENG_9th_forum.pdf
25. Cohen SA, Doob AN. 1989. Public attitudes to plea bargaining. Crim. Law Q. 32:85–109
    [Google Scholar]
26. Colson R, Field S. 2011. The Transformation of Criminal Justice: Comparing France with England and Wales Paris: L'Harmattan
27. Combs N. 2007. Guilty Pleas in International Criminal Law: Constructing a Restorative Justice Approach Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
28. Crespo AM. 2018. The hidden law of plea bargaining. Columbia Law Rev 118:1303–424
    [Google Scholar]
29. Danet J, Brizais R, Lorvellec S 2013. La célérité de la réponse pénale. La Réponse Pénale: Dix ans de Traitement des Délits J Danet 255–96 Rennes, Fr: PUR
    [Google Scholar]
30. Dawes W, Harvey P, McIntosh B, Nunney F, Phillips A 2011. Attitudes to Guilty Plea Reductions London: Sentencing Counc. Engl. Wales
31. Dervan LE, Edkins VA. 2013. The innocent defendant's dilemma: an innovative empirical study of plea bargaining's innocence problem. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 103:11
    [Google Scholar]
32. Desprez F. 2007. L'application de la comparution sur reconnaissance préalable de culpabilité à Nimes et Béziers: au regard du principe de judiciarité. Arch. Politique Crim. 29:145–69
    [Google Scholar]
33. Eisenstein J, Jacob H. 1977. Felony Justice: An Organizational Analysis of Criminal Court Boston, MA: Little Brown
34. Ericson RV, Baranek PM. 1982. The Ordering of Justice: A Study of Accused Persons as Dependants in the Criminal Process Toronto: Univ. Tor. Press
35. Fair Trials 2017. The Disappearing Trial: Towards a Rights-Based Approach to Trial Waiver Systems London: Fair Trials https://www.fairtrials.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Report-The-Disappearing-Trial.pdf
36. Falcone Salas D. 2005. La absolución en el procedimiento abreviado. Rev. Derecho Pontif. Univ. Catól. Valparaíso 26:363–78
    [Google Scholar]
37. Feeley M. 1979. The Process Is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court New York: Russell Sage Found.
38. Fisher G. 2003. Plea Bargaining's Triumph: A History of Plea Bargaining in America Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
39. Flynn A, Freiberg A. 2018. Plea Negotiations: Pragmatic Justice in an Imperfect World Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan
40. Fondevila G, Langer M, Bergman M, Vilalta C, Mejía A 2016. ¿Cómo se juzga en el Estado de México? Mexico City: CIDE
41. Goldstein AS, Marcus M. 1977. The myth of judicial supervision in three “inquisitorial” systems: France, Italy, and Germany. Yale Law J 87:240–83
    [Google Scholar]
42. Gross SR. 2008. Convicting the innocent. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 4:173–92
    [Google Scholar]
43. Grunvald S. 2013. Les choix et schémas d'orientation. La réponse pénale: Dix ans de traitment des délits J Danet 83–112 Rennes, Fr: PUR
    [Google Scholar]
44. Hagan J. 1974. Parameters of criminal prosecution: an application of path analysis to a problem of criminal justice. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 65:536–44
    [Google Scholar]
45. Hassemer R, Hippler G. 1986. Informelle Absprachen in der Praxis des deutschen Strafverfahrens. Strafverteidiger 8:360–64
    [Google Scholar]
46. Heberling JL. 1973. Conviction without trial. Anglo-Am. Law Rev. 2:428–72
    [Google Scholar]
47. Herzog S. 2004. Plea bargaining: less covert, more public support. Crime Delinquency 50:590–614
    [Google Scholar]
48. Heumann M. 1977. Plea Bargaining: The Experiences of Prosecutors, Judges and Defense Attorneys Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
49. Hodgson J. 2015. Plea bargaining: a comparative analysis. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences JD Wright 226–31 Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2nd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
50. Houllé R, Vaney G. 2017. La comparution sur reconnaissance préalable de culpabilité, une procedure pénale de plus en plus utilisée. Infostat Justice 157:1–8
    [Google Scholar]
51. Jehle JM, Wade M 2006. Coping with Overloaded Criminal Justice Systems: The Rise of Prosecutorial Power Across Europe Berlin: Springer
52. Johnson BD, King RD, Spohn C 2016. Sociolegal approaches to the study of guilty pleas and prosecution. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 12:479–95
    [Google Scholar]
53. Jonah B, Yuen L, Au-Yeung E, Paterson D, Dawson N et al. 1999. Front-line police officers’ practices, perceptions and attitudes about the enforcement of impaired driving laws in Canada. Accid. Anal. Prev. 31:421–43
    [Google Scholar]
54. Kellough G, Wortley S. 2002. Demand for a plea: bail decisions and plea bargaining as commensurate decisions. Brit. J. Criminol. 42:186–210
    [Google Scholar]
55. Kergandberg E. 2012. European Court of the Human Rights: Court of Fourth Instance in Estonia? Paper presented at The Role of Supreme Courts in the Protection of Human Rights Conference, Riga, Latv May 2
56. Kim AC. 2015. Underestimating the trial penalty: an empirical analysis of the federal trial penalty and critique of the Abrams study. Miss. Law J. 84:1195–255
    [Google Scholar]
57. King NJ, Wright RF. 2016. The invisible revolution in plea bargaining: managerial judging and judicial participating in negotiations. Tex. Law Rev. 95:325–97
    [Google Scholar]
58. Kohler-Hausmann I. 2014. Managerial justice and mass misdemeanors. Stanford Law Rev 66:611–93
    [Google Scholar]
59. Kohler-Hausmann I. 2018. Misdemeanorland: Criminal Courts and Social Control in an Age of Broken Windows Policing Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
60. Kutateladze BL, Lawson VZ, Andiloro NR 2015. Does evidence really matter? An exploratory analysis of the role of evidence in plea bargaining in felony drug cases. Law Hum. Behav. 39:431–42
    [Google Scholar]
61. Kutateladze BL, Lynn V, Liang E 2012. Do Race and Ethnicity Matter in Prosecution? A Review of Empirical Studies New York: Vera Inst. Justice
62. Laffranque J. 2015. European human rights and Estonia: one- or two-way street. Jurid. Int. 23:4–16
    [Google Scholar]
63. LaFree GD. 1985. Adversarial and nonadversarial justice: a comparison of guilty pleas and trials. Criminology 23:289–312
    [Google Scholar]
64. Langbein JH. 1979a. Land without plea bargaining: how the Germans do it. Mich. Law Rev. 78:204–25
    [Google Scholar]
65. Langbein JH. 1979b. Understanding the short history of plea bargaining. Law Soc. Rev. 13:261–72
    [Google Scholar]
66. Langbein JH, Weinreb LL. 1978. Continental criminal procedure: “myth” and reality. Yale Law J 87:1549–69
    [Google Scholar]
67. Langer M. 2004. From legal transplants to legal translations: the globalization of plea bargaining and the Americanization thesis in criminal procedure. Harvard Int. Law J. 45:1–64
    [Google Scholar]
68. Langer M. 2005. The rise of managerial judging in international criminal law. Am. J. Comp. Law 53:835–909
    [Google Scholar]
69. Langer M. 2006. Rethinking plea bargaining: the practice and reform of prosecutorial adjudication in American criminal procedure. Am. J. Crim. Law 33:223–99
    [Google Scholar]
70. Langer M. 2007. Revolution in Latin American criminal procedure: diffusion of legal ideas from the periphery. Am. J. Comp. Law 55::617–76
    [Google Scholar]
71. Langer M, Sklansky DA 2017. Prosecutors and Democracy: A Cross-National Study New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
72. Lenoir A, Retiére JN, Trémeau C 2013. Des délits et de leurs auteurs. …. In La Réponse Pénale: Dix ans de Traitment des Délits J Danet 113–58 Rennes, Fr: PUR
    [Google Scholar]
73. Lewis MK. 2009. Taiwan's new adversarial system and the overlooked challenge of efficiency-driven reforms. Va. J. Int. Law 49:651–726
    [Google Scholar]
74. Locker T. 2015. Absprachen im Strafverfahren: Ein Überblick und alternative Verfahrensweisen Hamburg, Ger: Diplomica
75. Luna E, Wade M. 2010. Prosecutors as judges. Wash. Lee Law Rev. 67:1413–532
    [Google Scholar]
76. Luna E, Wade M 2012. The Prosecutor in Transnational Perspective New York: Oxford Univ. Press
77. Lynch GE. 1998. Our administrative system of criminal justice. Fordham Law Rev 66:2117–51
    [Google Scholar]
78. Lynch M. 2016. Hard Bargains: The Coercive Power of Drug Laws in Federal Courts New York: Russell Sage Found.
79. Mann K. 1985. Defending White Collar Crime: A Portrait of Attorneys at Work New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
80. McConville M. 2002. Plea bargaining. The Handbook of the Criminal Justice System M McConville, G Wilson 353–77 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
81. McConville M, Choong S. 2011. Criminal Justice in China: An Empirical Inquiry Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
82. McEwan J. 2011. From adversarialism to managerialism: criminal justice in transition. Leg. Stud. 31:519–46
    [Google Scholar]
83. McKinnon v. United States 2008. H.L. 59, [2008] 1 W.L.R. 1739 (Lord Brown)
84. Natapoff A. 2018. Punishment Without a Crime: How Our Massive Misdemeanor System Traps the Innocent and Makes America More Unequal New York: Basic Books
85. Natsvlishvili and Togonidze v. Georgia App. No. 9043/05, Eur. Ct. H.R., Apr. 29, 2014
86. Newman DJ. 1966. The Determination of Guilt or Innocence Without Trial Boston, MA: Little Brown
87. Perrocheau V. 2010. La composition pénale et la comparution sur reconnaissance de culpabilité: quelles limites à l'omnipotence du parquet?. Droit Soc 74:55–71
    [Google Scholar]
88. Piehl AM, Bushway SD. 2007. Measuring and explaining charge bargaining. J. Quant. Criminol. 23:105–25
    [Google Scholar]
89. Pinard M. 2010. Collateral consequences of criminal convictions: confronting issues of race and dignity. N. Y. Univ. Law Rev. 85:457–534
    [Google Scholar]
90. Pina-Sánchez J, Brunton-Smith I, Guanquang L 2020. Mind the step: a more insightful and robust analysis of the sentencing process in England and Wales under the new sentencing guidelines. Criminol. Crim. Justice 20:268–301
    [Google Scholar]
91. Ponce Chauca N. 2008. La reforma procesal penal en Perú: avances y desafíos a partir de las experiencias en Huaura y la Libertad Santiago: CEJA http://biblioteca.cejamericas.org/handle/2015/5138
92. Pouget P. 2013. La mise en place de la diversification du traitement des délits à travers la legislation. La réponse pénale: Dix ans de traitment des délits J Danet 49–81 Rennes, Fr: PUR
    [Google Scholar]
93. R. Comm. Crim. Justice. 1993. Report of the Royal Commission on Criminal Justice London: HMSO https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/271971/2263.pdf
94. R v. Goodyear 2005. EWCA (Crim) 888
95. R v. Hollington and Emmens 1986. 82 Crim. App 281
96. Redlich AD, Summers A, Hoover S 2009. Self-reported false confessions and false guilty pleas among offenders with mental illness. Law Hum. Behav. 34:79–90
    [Google Scholar]
97. Rehavi MM, Starr SB. 2014. Racial disparity in federal criminal sentences. J. Political Econ. 122:61320–54
    [Google Scholar]
98. Riego C. 2008. Oral procedures and case management: the innovations of Chile's reform. Southwest. J. Law Trade Am. 14:339–56
    [Google Scholar]
99. Riego C. 2017. El procedimiento abreviado en la ley 20.931. Politica Crim 12:1085–105
    [Google Scholar]
100. Roberts J, Bradford B. 2015. Sentence reductions for a guilty plea in England and Wales: exploring new empirical trends. J. Empir. Leg. Stud. 12:187–210
     [Google Scholar]
101. Saas C, Lorvellec S, Gautron V 2013. Les sanctions pénales, une nouvelle distribution. La réponse pénale: Dix ans de traitment des délits J Danet 159–210 Rennes, Fr: PUR
     [Google Scholar]
102. Salas Beteta C. 2011. La eficacia del proceso penal acusatorio en el Perú. Prolegómenos Derechos Valores 2:263–75
     [Google Scholar]
103. Sánchez Mejía AL. 2017. Victims’ Rights in Flux: Criminal Justice Reform in Colombia Berlin: Springer
104. Schünemann B. 1990. Absprachen im Strafverfahren? Grundlagen, Gegenstände und Grenzen. Gutachten B. zum 58 Juristentag Munich, Ger: C.H. Beck
105. Semukhina OB, Reynolds KM. 2009. Plea bargaining implementation and acceptance in modern Russia. Int. Crim. Justice Rev. 19:400–32
     [Google Scholar]
106. Sentencing Counc. 2017. Reduction in Sentence for a Guilty Plea: Definitive Guideline London: Sentencing Counc https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Reduction-in-Sentence-for-Guilty-Plea-definitive-guideline-SC-Web.pdf
107. Shermer LO, Johnson BD. 2010. Criminal prosecutions: examining prosecutorial discretion and charge reductions in U.S. federal district courts. Justice Q 27:3394–430
     [Google Scholar]
108. Siolek W. 1993. Neues zum Thema Verständigung im Strafverfahren. DriZ 1993:422–30
     [Google Scholar]
109. Skolnick JH. 2011. Justice Without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society New Orleans, LA: Quid Pro Books, 4th ed..
110. Smith BP. 2005. Plea bargaining and the eclipse of the jury. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 1:131–49
     [Google Scholar]
111. Smith DA. 1986. The plea bargaining controversy. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 77:949–68
     [Google Scholar]
112. Solomon PH. 1983. Criminal Justice Policy, From Research to Reform Toronto: Butterworths
113. Solomon PH. 2012. Plea bargaining Russian style. Demokratizatsiya 20:282–99
     [Google Scholar]
114. Solomon PH. 2015. Post-Soviet criminal justice: the persistence of distorted neo-inquisitorialism. Theor. Criminol. 19:159–78
     [Google Scholar]
115. Soubise L. 2018. Guilty pleas in an inquisitorial setting—an empirical study of France. J. Law Soc. 45:398–426
     [Google Scholar]
116. Spamann H. 2015. Empirical comparative law. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 11:131–53
     [Google Scholar]
117. Spohn C, Beichner D, Davis-Frenzel E 2001. Prosecutorial justifications for sexual assault case rejection: guarding the “gateway to justice. .” Soc. Probl. 48:2206–35
     [Google Scholar]
118. Taubald C. 2009. Konsensuale erledigung von strafverfahren in Deutschland und Frankreich PhD Thesis, Univ. Tübingen, Ger .
119. Thaman SC. 2010a. A typology of consensual criminal procedure: an historical and comparative perspective on the theory and practice of avoiding full criminal trials. World Plea Bargaining: Consensual Procedure and the Avoidance of the Full Criminal Trial SC Thaman 297–395 Durham, NC: Carol. Acad. Press
     [Google Scholar]
120. Thaman SC 2010b. World Plea Bargaining: Consensual Procedure and the Avoidance of the Full Criminal Trial Durham, NC: Carol. Acad. Press
121. Thaman SC. 2012. The penal order: prosecutorial sentencing as a model for criminal justice reform. The Prosecutor in Transnational Perspective E Luna, M Wade 156–75 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
122. Thaxton S. 2013. Leveraging death. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 103:475–552
     [Google Scholar]
123. The Prosecutor v. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi Case No. ICC-01/12–01/15, Judgment and Sentence (September 27, 2016)
124. Tulkens F, Cartuyvels Y, Wattier I 2002. Negotiated justice. European Criminal Procedures M Delmas-Marty, JR Spencer 641–87 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
125. Turner JI. 2006. Judicial participation in plea negotiations: a comparative view. Am. J. Comp. Law 54:199–267
     [Google Scholar]
126. Turner JI. 2009. Plea Bargaining Across Borders New York: Aspen Publ.
127. Turner JI, Weigend T. 2020. Negotiated case dispositions in Germany, England, and the United States. Core Concepts in Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, Vol. 1 K Ambos, A Duff, J Roberts, T Weigend 389–427 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
128. Ulmer JT, Eisenstein J, Johnson BD 2009. Trial penalties in federal sentencing: extra-guidelines factors and district variation. Justice Q 27:560–92
     [Google Scholar]
129. UN Hum. Rights Comm. 2016. Commun. No. 2005/2010, CCPR/C/115/D/2005/2010, Feb. 19
130. UN Off. Drugs Crime (UNODC). 2017. Criminal justice system process Statistics and Crime: UNODC https://dataunodc.un.org/crime/CJS_process
131. US Dep. State. 2012. Country reports on human rights practices for 2011: Georgia Bur. Democr. Hum. Rights Labor Rep., US Dep. State Washington, DC: https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents/organization/186565.pdf
132. US Dep. State. 2015. Country reports on human rights practices for 2014: Georgia Bur. Democr. Hum. Rights Labor Rep., US Dep. State Washington, DC: https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents/organization/236738.pdf
133. US Dep. State. 2018. Country reports on human rights practices for 2017: Georgia Bur. Democr. Hum. Rights Labor Rep., US Dep. State Washington, DC: https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Georgia.pdf
134. Van Cleave RA. 1997. An offer you can't refuse? Punishment without trial in Italy and the United States: the search for truth and an efficient criminal justice system. Emory Int. Law Rev. 11:419–69
     [Google Scholar]
135. Vance SE, Oleson JC. 2013. Displaced discretion: the effects of sentencing guidelines on prosecutors’ charge bargaining in the District of Columbia Superior Court. Crim. Justice Policy Rev. 25:347–77
     [Google Scholar]
136. Verdun-Jones SN. 2016. Plea bargaining. Criminal Justice in Canada: A Reader JV Roberts, M Grossman 168–84 Toronto: Nelson Educ, 5th ed..
     [Google Scholar]
137. Warsmann JL. 2005. Rapport d'information de la commission des lois sur la mise en appli-cation de la loi n° 2004–204 du 9 mars 2004 portant adaptation de la justice aux évolutions de la criminalité Inf. Rep. AN 2378, Assem. Natl Paris:
138. World Prison Brief. 2020. Highest to lowest: prison population data WPB London: http://www.prisonstudies.org/highest-to-lowest/prison_population_rate?field_region_taxonomy_tid=All
     [Google Scholar]