1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Environment and Resources
  4. Volume 45, 2020
  5. Article

Annual Review of Environment and Resources

Volume 45, 2020

The Tropes of Celebrity Environmentalism

Abstract

Celebrity advocacy for environmental causes has grown dramatically in recent decades. An examination of this expansion and the rise of causes such as climate change reveals the shifting politics and organization of advocacy. We address these changes to the construction and interpretation of celebrity advocacy and detail how they have produced a rich variety of environmental celebrity advocates. We also account for differences between legacy (e.g., radio, TV, newspapers) and online celebrities and their practices (e.g., hashtag publics, brandjacking, online communities). Environmental celebrity advocates’ performances can be divided into nine tropes, each characterized in part by the particular varieties of environmentalism that they promote. We present the tropes and discuss their five cross-cutting themes. We conclude with a set of questions for future research on celebrity environmentalism.

Keyword(s): celebrity, consumer, environmentalism, inequality, legacy media, politics, social media, trope
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-081703
2020-10-17
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/energy/45/1/annurev-environ-012320-081703.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-081703&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. 1. 
    Brockington D. 2014. The production and construction of celebrity advocacy in international development. Third World Q 35:88–108
     [Google Scholar]
  2. 2. 
    Cooper AF. 2008. Celebrity Diplomacy Boulder, CO: Paradigm
  3. 3. 
    Richey LA, Ponte S. 2011. Brand Aid. Shopping Well to Save the World Minneapolis, MN: Univ. Minn. Press
  4. 4. 
    Tsaliki L, Frangonikolopoulos CA, Huliaras Aeds 2011. Transnational Celebrity Activism in Global Politics. Changing the World? Bristol, UK: Intellect
     [Google Scholar]
  5. 5. 
    Richey LA. 2016. Celebrity Humanitarianism and North-South Relations. Politics, Place and Power London: Routledge
  6. 6. 
    Boykoff M, Goodman M, Curtis I 2009. The cultural politics of climate change: interactions in the spaces of the everyday. The Politics of Climate Change M Boykoff 136–54 London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  7. 7. 
    Van Den Bulck H. 2018. Celebrity Philanthropy and Activism. Mediated Interventions in the Global Public Sphere London: Routledge
  8. 8. 
    Goodman MK, Littler J, Brockington D, Boykoff MT 2016. Spectacular environmentalisms: media, knowledge and the framing of ecological politics. Environ. Commun. 10:677–88
     [Google Scholar]
  9. 9. 
    Partzsch L. 2018. Take action now: the legitimacy of celebrity power in international relations. Glob. Gov. 24:229–48
     [Google Scholar]
  10. 10. 
    Turner G. 2016. Celebrities and the environment: the limits to their power. Environ. Commun. 10:811–14
     [Google Scholar]
  11. 11. 
    Turner G. 2004. Understanding Celebrity London: Sage
  12. 12. 
    Boykoff M, Goodman MK. 2009. Conspicuous redemption? Reflections on the promises and perils of the “celebritization” of climate change. Geoforum 40:395–406
     [Google Scholar]
  13. 13. 
    Gamson J. 1994. Claims to Fame. Celebrity in Contemporary America Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  14. 14. 
    Brockington D. 2014. Celebrity Advocacy and International Development London: Routledge
  15. 15. 
    Wernick A. 1991. Promotional Culture: Advertising, Ideology and Symbolic Expression London: Sage
  16. 16. 
    Driessens O. 2013. Celebrity capital: redefining celebrity using field theory. Theory Soc 42:543–60
     [Google Scholar]
  17. 17. 
    Abidin C. 2018. Internet Celebrity: Understanding Fame Online Bingley, UK: Emerald Publ.
  18. 18. 
    Cunningham S, Craig D. 2019. Social Media Entertainment: The New Intersection of Hollywood and Silicon Valley New York: New York Univ. Press
  19. 19. 
    Duffy EB. 2017. (Not) Getting Paid to Do What You Live: Gender, Social Media, and Aspirational Work New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  20. 20. 
    Jeffreys E. 2010. Accidental celebrities: China's chastity heroines and charity. Celebrity in China L Edwards, E Jeffreys 67–84 Hong Kong: Hong Kong Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  21. 21. 
    Turner G, Bonner F, Marshall DP 2000. Fame Games. The Production of Celebrity in Australia Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  22. 22. 
    Abidin C. 2016. Aren't these just young, rich women doing vain things online?: Influencer selfies as subversive frivolity. Soc. Media + Society. 2: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116641342
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  23. 23. 
    Grindstaff L. 2012. Reality TV and the production of “ordinary celebrity”: notes from the field. Berkeley J. Sociol. 56:22–40
     [Google Scholar]
  24. 24. 
    Chung S, Cho H. 2014. Parasocial relationship via reality TV and social media: its implications for celebrity endorsement. TVX '14: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video47–54 New York: Assoc. Comput. Mach https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2602306
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 25. 
    Hill A. 2015. Reality TV New York: Routledge
  26. 26. 
    Ouellette L, Hay J. 2008. Better Living Through Reality TV Oxford: Blackwell
  27. 27. 
    Turner G. 2006. The mass production of celebrity: “Celetoids,” reality TV and the “demotic turn. .” Int. J. Cult. Stud. 9:153–65
     [Google Scholar]
  28. 28. 
    Deller R. 2019. Reality Television: The TV Phenomenon that Changed the World Bingley, UK: Emerald Publ.
  29. 29. 
    Marwick A. 2013. Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity, and Branding in the Social Media Age New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  30. 30. 
    Senft TM. 2008. Camgirls: Celebrity and Community in the Age of Social Networks New York: Peter Lang
  31. 31. 
    Milner RM. 2016. The World Made Meme: Public Conversations and Participatory Media Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  32. 32. 
    Ladorteza EM. 2014. Cute-ifying disability: Lil Bub, the celebrity cat. M/C J 17:2 http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/784
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 33. 
    Abidin C. 2017. #familygoals: family influencers, calibrated amateurism, and justifying young digital labor. Soc. Media + Society 3:2 https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117707191
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  34. 34. 
    Hearn A, Schoenhoff S. 2016. From celebrity to influencer: tracing the diffusion of celebrity value across the data stream. A Companion to Celebrity PD Marshall, S Redmond 194–212 West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
  35. 35. 
    Khamis S, Ang L, Welling R 2016. Self-branding, “micro-celebrity” and the rise of social media influencers. Celebrity Stud 8:191–208
     [Google Scholar]
  36. 36. 
    Horton D, Wohl R. 1956. Mass communication and para-social interaction: observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry 19:215–29
     [Google Scholar]
  37. 37. 
    Abidin C. 2015. Communicative intimacies: influencers and perceived interconnectedness. Ada: J. Gender New Media Technol. 8: https://adanewmedia.org/2015/11/issue8-abidin/
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 38. 
    Littler J. 2008. “I feel your pain”: cosmopolitan charity and the public fashioning of the celebrity soul. Soc. Semiotics 18:237–51
     [Google Scholar]
  39. 39. 
    Abrams L. 2014. The story behind #AskChevron: how a group of environmentalists hijacked Twitter. Salon.com. https://www.salon.com/2014/05/30/the_story_behind_askchevron_how_a_group_of_environmentalists_hijacked_twitter/
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 40. 
    Bruns A, Moon B, Paul A, Munch F 2016. Towards a typology of hashtag publics: a large-scale comparative study of user engagement across trending topics. Commun. Res. Pract. 2:20–46
     [Google Scholar]
  41. 41. 
    Losh E. 2019. Hashtag New York: Bloomsbury Acad.
  42. 42. 
    Rambukkana N. 2015. Hashtag Publics: The Power and Politics of Discursive Networks New York: Peter Lang
  43. 43. 
    Williams S. 2015. Digital defense: black feminists resist violence with hashtag activism. Feminist Media Stud 15:341–44
     [Google Scholar]
  44. 44. 
    Cova B, Pace S. 2006. Brand community of convenience products: new forms of customer empowerment—the case “my Nutella the Community. .” Eur. J. Mark. 40:1087–105
     [Google Scholar]
  45. 45. 
    Luoma-aho VL, Virolainen M, Lievonen M, Halff G 2018. Brand hijacked: why campaigns and hashtags are taken over by audiences. Social, Mobile, and Emerging Media Around the World AV Laskin 57–68 Lanham, MA: Lexington Books
     [Google Scholar]
  46. 46. 
    Najafabadi MM, Domanski RJ. 2018. Hacktivism and distributed hashtag spoiling on Twitter: tales of the #IranTalks. First Monday 23. https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/8378/6663
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 47. 
    Wipperfurth A. 2005. Brand Hijack: Marketing Without Marketing New York City: Port Folio
  48. 48. 
    Gilkerson N, Berg KT. 2018. Social media, hashtag hijacking, and the evolution of an activist group strategy. Social Media and Crisis Communication L Austin, Y Jin 141–55 New York: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  49. 49. 
    Najafabadi MM. 2017. A research agenda for distributed hashtag spoiling: tails of a survived trending hashtag. Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research CC Hinnant, A Ojo 21–29 New York: Assoc. Comput. Mach.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. 50. 
    Pang A, Limsico JIL, Phong L, Lareza BJL, Low SY 2018. Reputational damage on Twitter #hijack. From Media Hype to Twitter Storm: News Explosions and Their Impact on Issues, Crises and Public Opinion P Vasterman 355–81 Amsterdam: Amsterdam Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  51. 51. 
    Still J. 2014. Five Greenpeace campaigns against companies: Lego, Barbie and Shell. The Guardian Aug. 7. https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/blog/greenpeace-campaigns-companies-lego-mattel-barbie-shell
    [Google Scholar]
  52. 52. 
    Kutner LA. 2000. Environmental activism and the environment. Electron. Green J. 1: http://repositories.cdlib.org/uclalib/egj/vol1/iss12/art4/
    [Google Scholar]
  53. 53. 
    Lester L, Brett H. 2009. Power games: environmental protest, news media and the internet. Media, Cult. Soc. 31:579–95
     [Google Scholar]
  54. 54. 
    Park N, Yang A. 2012. Online environmental community members’ intention to participate in environmental activities: an application of the theory of planned behavior in the Chinese context. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28:1298–306
     [Google Scholar]
  55. 55. 
    Freiner N. 2013. Mobilizing mothers: the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear catastrophe and environmental activism in Japan. ASIANetwork Exch. 21:27–41
     [Google Scholar]
  56. 56. 
    Stoddart MCJ, MacDonald L. 2011. “Keep it wild, keep it local”: comparing news media and the Internet as sites for environmental movement activism for Jumbo Pass, British Columbia. Can. J. Sociol. 36:313–35
     [Google Scholar]
  57. 57. 
    Sima Y. 2011. Grassroots environmental activism and the Internet: constructing a green public sphere in China. Asian Stud. Rev. 35:477–97
     [Google Scholar]
  58. 58. 
    Kurniawan NI, Rye SA. 2013. Online environmental activism and Internet use in the Indonesian environmental movement. Inform. Dev. 30:200–12
     [Google Scholar]
  59. 59. 
    Pang N, Khiun LK. 2014. Archiving the wild, the wild archivist: Bukit Brown Cemetery and Singapore's emerging “docu-tivists. .” Arch. Manuscr. 42:87–97
     [Google Scholar]
  60. 60. 
    Forrest T. 2019. Brodie “Youngbloods” Moss quit his job as an electrician to become a full-time YouTuber. ABC News Aug. 17. https://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2019-08-17/brodie-youngbloods-moss-quits-job-to-become-a-youtuber/11391924?pfm=sm
    [Google Scholar]
  61. 61. 
    Murphy M. 2019. Zero waste on Instagram through the lens of precautionary consumption. Gettysburg Soc. Sci. Rev. 3:22–39
     [Google Scholar]
  62. 62. 
    Bogle A. 2019. Students are fighting climate change, one TikTok video at a time. ABC News Sept. 19. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-09-19/tiktok-youth-led-climate-activism-school-strike/11520474
    [Google Scholar]
  63. 63. 
    Gamson J. 1992. The assembly line of greatness: celebrity in twentieth-century America. Crit. Stud. Media Commun. 9:1–24
     [Google Scholar]
  64. 64. 
    Meyer DS, Gamson J. 1995. The challenge of cultural elites: celebrities and social movements. Sociol. Inq. 65:181–206
     [Google Scholar]
  65. 65. 
    Thrall AT, Lollio-Fakhreddine J, Berent J, Donnelly L, Herrin W et al. 2008. Star power: celebrity advocacy and the evolution of the public sphere. Int. J. Press/Politics 13:362–85
     [Google Scholar]
  66. 66. 
    Marsh D, ’t Hart P, Tindall K 2010. Celebrity politics: the politics of the late modernity?. Political Stud. Rev. 8:322–40
     [Google Scholar]
  67. 67. 
    Chouliaraki L. 2012. The theatricality of humanitarianism: a critique of celebrity advocacy. Commun. Crit./Cult. Stud. 9:1–21
     [Google Scholar]
  68. 68. 
    Huggan G. 2013. Nature's Saviours. Celebrity Conservationists in the Television Age London: Earthscan
  69. 69. 
    Spurr D. 1993. The Rhetoric of Empire: Colonial Discourse in Journalism, Travel Writing, and Imperial Administration Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  70. 70. 
    Richey LA, Brockington D. 2019. Celebrity humanitarianism: using tropes of engagement to understand North/South relations. Perspect. Politics 18:43–59
     [Google Scholar]
  71. 71. 
    Mostafanezhad M. 2016. Angelina Jolie and the everyday geopolitics of celebrity humanitarianism in a Thailand-Burma border town. Celebrity Humanitarianism and North-South Relations. Politics, Place and Power LA Richey 27–47 London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  72. 72. 
    Brockington D, Henson S. 2015. Signifying the public: celebrity advocacy and post-democratic politics. Int. J. Cult. Stud. 18:431–48
     [Google Scholar]
  73. 73. 
    Brockington D. 2015. Towards an international understanding of the power of celebrity persuasions. A review and a research agenda. Celebrity Stud 6:486–504
     [Google Scholar]
  74. 74. 
    Goodman M, Littler J. 2013. Celebrity ecologies: introduction. Celebrity Stud 4:269–75
     [Google Scholar]
  75. 75. 
    Bowen-Jones E, Entwistle A. 2002. Identifying appropriate flagship species: the importance of culture and local contexts. Oryx 36:189–95
     [Google Scholar]
  76. 76. 
    Walpole MJ, Leader-Williams N. 2002. Tourism and flagship species in conservation. Biodiversity Conserv 11:543–47
     [Google Scholar]
  77. 77. 
    Couldry N. 2001. The hidden injuries of media power. J. Consumer Cult. 1:155–77
     [Google Scholar]
  78. 78. 
    Blewitt J. 2013. What's new pussy cat? A genealogy of animal celebrity. Celebrity Stud 4:325–38
     [Google Scholar]
  79. 79. 
    McCubbin SG. 2019. The Cecil Moment: celebrity environmentalism, Nature 2.0, and the cultural politics of lion trophy hunting. Geoforum 108:194–203
     [Google Scholar]
  80. 80. 
    Forsyth T, Walker A. 2008. Forest Guardians, Forest Destroyers: The Politics of Environmental Knowledge in Northern Thailand Seattle, WA: Univ. Wash. Press
  81. 81. 
    Calvario L. 2016. “Before the flood”: Leonardo DiCaprio's climate change doc gets record 60 million views. IndieWire Nov. 16. https://www.indiewire.com/2016/11/before-the-flood-climate-change-documentary-record-60-million-views-1201747088/
    [Google Scholar]
  82. 82. 
    Bote J. 2019. Lil Dicky's “Earth” video is Band Aid for the Internet. National Public Radio Apr. 19. https://www.npr.org/2019/04/19/715140398/lil-dickys-earth-video-is-band-aid-for-the-internet?t%20=%201574948680182
    [Google Scholar]
  83. 83. 
    Greene A. 2019. Lil Dicky enlists Bieber, Ariana, Halsey, Shawn Mendes for all-star “Earth” video. Rolling Stone Apr. 19. https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/lil-dicky-enlists-bieber-ariana-halsey-shawn-mendes-for-all-star-earth-video-823618/
    [Google Scholar]
  84. 84. 
    Neumann R. 1996. Dukes, earls, and ersatz Edens: aristocratic nature preservationists in colonial Africa. Society Space 14:79–98
     [Google Scholar]
  85. 85. 
    Adams WM. 2004. Against Extinction. The Story of Conservation London: Earthscan
  86. 86. 
    Steinhart EI 2006. Black Poachers, White Hunters. A Social History of Hunting in Colonial Kenya Oxford: James Currey
  87. 87. 
    Ellis S. 1994. Of elephants and men: politics and nature conservation in South Africa. J. South. Afr. Stud. 20:53–69
     [Google Scholar]
  88. 88. 
    Wainaina B. 2005. How to write about Africa. Granta 92: https://granta.com/how-to-write-about-africa/
    [Google Scholar]
  89. 89. 
    Brockington D. 2009. Celebrity and the Environment. Fame, Wealth and Power in Conservation. London: Zed
  90. 90. 
    Beinart W. 2007. The Lion Queen. Environ. Hist. 12:283–86
     [Google Scholar]
  91. 91. 
    Beinart W, McKeown K. 2008. Wildlife media and representations of Africa, 1950s to the 1970s. Environ. Hist. 14:429–52
     [Google Scholar]
  92. 92. 
    Garland E. 2008. The elephant in the room: confronting the colonial character of wildlife conservation in Africa. Afr. Stud. Rev. 51:51–74
     [Google Scholar]
  93. 93. 
    Mbaria J, Ogada M. 2016. The Big Conservation Lie Seattle, Wash: Lens and Pens Publ.
  94. 94. 
    Smith DB. 1990. From the Land of Shadows. The Making of Grey Owl. Saskatoon, Sask., Can: West. Prod. Prairie Books
  95. 95. 
    Allegretti M. 2008. A construção social de políticas públicas. Chico Mendes e o movimento dos seringueiros. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente 18:39–59
     [Google Scholar]
  96. 96. 
    Wilde O. 2017. 1905. De Profundis Scotts Valley, CA: CreateSpace Indep. Publ. Platform
  97. 97. 
    Stott P. 2010. Conservation: a magical process. Nature 468:764
     [Google Scholar]
  98. 98. 
    Prince of Wales, Juniper T, Skelly I 2010. Harmony: A New Way of Looking at Our World London: Harper Collins
  99. 99. 
    Brockington D. 2008. Celebrity conservation: interpreting the Irwins. Media Int. Aust. 127:96–108
     [Google Scholar]
  100. 100. 
    Mitman G. 1999. Reel Nature. America's Romance with Wildlife on Film. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  101. 101. 
    Bouse D. 2000. Wildlife Films Philadelphia: Univ. PA Press
  102. 102. 
    Gray J. 2002. Snarl for the Camera. Tales of a Wildlife Cameraman. London: Judy Piaktus
  103. 103. 
    Vivanco LA. 2004. The work of environmentalism in an age of televisual adventures. Cult. Dyn. 16:5–27
     [Google Scholar]
  104. 104. 
    Prudham S. 2009. Pimping climate change: Richard Branson, global warming, and the performance of green capitalism. Environ. Plann. A 41:1594–613
     [Google Scholar]
  105. 105. 
    Klein N. 2014. This Changes Everything: Capitalism versus the Climate New York: Simon & Schuster
  106. 106. 
    Goodell R. 1977. The Visible Scientists Boston, MA: Little, Brown
  107. 107. 
    Boykoff MT, Olson SK. 2013. “Wise contrarians:” a keystone species in contemporary climate science, politics and policy. Celebrity Stud 4:276–91
     [Google Scholar]
  108. 108. 
    Boykoff M. 2011. Who Speaks for the Climate? Media Coverage of Climate Change Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  109. 109. 
    Films for Action 2016. Under the Surface. Naomi Klein and the Great Barrier Reef. https://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/under-the-surface-naomi-klein-and-the-great-barrier-reef/
  110. 110. 
    Klein N. 2016. Climate change is intergenerational theft. That's why my son is part of this story. The Guardian Nov. 6. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/nov/07/climate-change-is-intergenerational-theft-thats-why-my-son-is-part-of-this-story
    [Google Scholar]
  111. 111. 
    National Public Radio 2019. Greta Thunberg's speech at the U.N. Climate Action Summit. National Public Radio Sept. 23. https://www.npr.org/2019/09/23/763452863/transcript-greta-thunbergs-speech-at-the-u-n-climate-action-summit
    [Google Scholar]
  112. 112. 
    Busby E. 2019. Climate change activism “reducing mental health symptoms among young people. .” Independent Nov. 28. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/climate-change-school-strikes-mental-health-students-children-a9225081.html
    [Google Scholar]
  113. 113. 
    Zatat N. 2019. There's a Greta Thunberg Helpline for “middle aged men” who are angry with her. Independent Sept. 28. https://twitter.com/independent/status/1178026589302353920
    [Google Scholar]
  114. 114. 
    Plastikophobia 2019. #PLASTIKOPHOBIA: sustainable Singapore gallery: March 7th–April 18th, Marina Barrage, Singapore. plastikophobia.com. https://plastikophobia.com/
    [Google Scholar]
  115. 115. 
    Hicks R. 2019. “Plastikophobia” aims to scare Singapore into consuming less plastic. Eco-Business Mar. 12. https://www.eco-business.com/news/plastikophobia-aims-to-scare-singapore-into-consuming-less-plastic/
    [Google Scholar]
  116. 116. 
    Sodastream SA. 2017. Paris Hilton just changed science forever—Nanodrop. YouTube Apr. 3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_0-ORuQlyA
    [Google Scholar]
  117. 117. 
    SodaStream Int 2017. SodaStream reveals April Fools’ Day prank with Paris Hilton. PR Newswire Apr. 3. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/sodastream-reveals-april-fools-day-prank-with-paris-hilton-300432766.html
    [Google Scholar]
  118. 118. 
    Bennett J. 2010. Vibrant Matter. A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  119. 119. 
    Büscher B. 2013. Nature 2.0. Geoforum 44:1–3
     [Google Scholar]
  120. 120. 
    Latour B. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf
  121. 121. 
    Doyle J, Farrell N, Goodman MK 2017. Celebrities and climate change. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.596
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  122. 122. 
    Nijhuis M. 2017. What's missing from “An Inconvenient Sequel,” Al Gore's new climate-change documentary. The New Yorker July 29. https://www.newyorker.com/science/elements/whats-missing-from-an-inconvenient-sequel-al-gores-new-climate-change-documentary
    [Google Scholar]
  123. 123. 
    Rojek C. 2013. Celanthropy, music therapy and “big-citizen” Samaritans. Celebrity Stud 4:129–43
     [Google Scholar]
  124. 124. 
    Latour B. 2018. Down to Earth. Politics in the New Climatic Regime London: Polity
  125. 125. 
    Brockington D. 2016. Epilogue: The politics of celebrity humanitarianism. Celebrity Humanitarianism and North-South Relations. Politics, Place and Power LA Richey 210–18 London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-081703
Loading
The Tropes of Celebrity Environmentalism
Annual Review of Environment and Resources 45, 387 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-081703
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-081703
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-081703
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error