1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Environment and Resources
  4. Volume 37, 2012
  5. Article

Annual Review of Environment and Resources

Volume 37, 2012

Municipal Solid Waste and the Environment: A Global Perspective

Abstract

Municipal solid waste (MSW) reflects the culture that produces it and affects the health of the people and the environment surrounding it. Globally, people are discarding growing quantities of waste, and its composition is more complex than ever before, as plastic and electronic consumer products diffuse. Concurrently, the world is urbanizing at an unprecedented rate. These trends pose a challenge to cities, which are charged with managing waste in a socially and environmentally acceptable manner. Effective waste management strategies depend on local waste characteristics, which vary with cultural, climatic, and socioeconomic variables, and institutional capacity. Globally, waste governance is becoming regionalized and formalized. In industrialized nations, where citizens produce far more waste than do other citizens, waste tends to be managed formally at a municipal or regional scale. In less-industrialized nations, where citizens produce less waste, which is mostly biogenic, a combination of formal and informal actors manages waste. Many waste management policies, technologies, and behaviors provide a variety of environmental benefits, including climate change mitigation. Key waste management challenges include integrating the informal waste sector in developing cities, reducing consumption in industrialized cities, increasing and standardizing the collection and analysis of solid waste data, and effectively managing increasingly complex waste while protecting people and the environment.

Keyword(s): behavior change, climate change, electronic waste, informal sector, reuse and recycling, solid waste management, waste governance
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-050511-122532
2012-11-21
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/energy/37/1/annurev-environ-050511-122532.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-050511-122532&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Williams PT. 1.  2005. Waste Treatment and Disposal West Sussex, UK: Wiley380
  2. Tchobanoglous G, Kreith F. 2.  2002. Handbook of Solid Waste Management New York: McGraw-Hill, 2nd ed..
  3. McDougall F, White P, Franke M, Hindle P. 3.  2001. Integrated Solid Waste Management: A Life Cycle Inventory Oxford, UK/Malden, MA: Blackwell Sci, 2nd ed..
  4. Rathje WL. 4.  1992. Rubbish!: The Archaeology of Garbage New York: HarperCollins
  5. McDonough W. 5.  2002. Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things New York: North Point
  6. Desrochers P. 6.  2002. Industrial ecology and the rediscovery of inter-firm recycling linkages: historical evidence and policy implications. Ind. Corp. Change 11:51031–57 [Google Scholar]
  7. Assaad R. 7.  1996. Formalizing the informal? The transformation of Cairo's refuse collection system. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 16:2115–26 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bogner J, Abdelrafie AM, Diaz C, Faaij A, Gao Q. 8.  et al. 2007. Waste management. Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change B Metz, OR Davidson, PR Bosch, R Dave, LA Meyer Cambridge, UK: /New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  9. Johnstone N, Labonne J. 9.  2004. Generation of household solid waste in OECD countries: an empirical analysis using macroeconomic data. Land Econ. 80:4529–38 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cohen B. 10.  2004. Urban growth in developing countries: a review of current trends and a caution regarding existing forecasts. World Dev. 32:123–51 [Google Scholar]
  11. Myers N, Kent J. 11.  2003. New consumers: the influence of affluence on the environment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:4963–68 [Google Scholar]
  12. White P, Franke M, Hindle P. 12.  1999. Integrated Solid Waste Management: A Lifecycle Inventory New York: Chapman & Hall
  13. 13. IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ML Parry, OF Canziani, JP Palutikof, PJ van der Linden, CE Hanson Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.976 [Google Scholar]
  14. Habitat UN. 14.  2010. Solid Waste Management in the World's Cities London: UN Hum. Settl. Programme
  15. Khalid A, Arshad M, Anjum M, Mahmood T, Dawson L. 15.  2011. The anaerobic digestion of solid organic waste. Waste Manag. 31:81737–44 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kalogo Y, Habibi S, MacLean HL, Joshi SV. 16.  2006. Environmental implications of municipal solid waste-derived ethanol. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41:135–41 [Google Scholar]
  17. Diaz LF, de Bertoldi M, Bidlingmaier W, Stentiford E. 17.  2007. Compost Science and Technology Amsterdam/Boston: Elsevier
  18. Hoornweg D, Bhada-Tata P. 18.  2012. What a Waste: Waste Management around the World Washington, DC: World Bank
  19. Kinnaman TC. 19.  2009. The economics of municipal solid waste management. Waste Manag. 29:102615–17 [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhen-shan L, Lei Y, Xiao-Yan Q, Yu-mei S. 20.  2009. Municipal solid waste management in Beijing city. Waste Manag. 29:92596–99 [Google Scholar]
  21. Gómez G, Meneses M, Ballinas L, Castells F. 21.  2009. Seasonal characterization of municipal solid waste (MSW) in the city of Chihuahua, Mexico. Waste Manag. 29:72018–24 [Google Scholar]
  22. Dangi MB, Pretz CR, Urynowicz MA, Gerow KG, Reddy JM. 22.  2011. Municipal solid waste generation in Kathmandu, Nepal. J. Environ. Manag. 92:1240–49 [Google Scholar]
  23. Walsh DC. 23.  2002. Urban residential refuse composition and generation rates for the 20th century. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36:224936–42 [Google Scholar]
  24. Nnorom IC, Osibanjo O. 24.  2008. Electronic waste (e-waste): material flows and management practices in Nigeria. Waste Manag. 28:81472–79 [Google Scholar]
  25. Wagner TP. 25.  2009. Shared responsibility for managing electronic waste: a case study of Maine, USA. Waste Manag. 29:123014–21 [Google Scholar]
  26. Boeni H, Silva U, Ott D. 26.  2009. E-waste recycling in Latin America: overview, challenges and potential. Recycling, Waste Treatment and Clean Technology Global Symposium, Cancun, Mex., Oct. 12–15, 2008, ed. B. Mishra 615–23 Red Hook, NY: Curran Assoc. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ongondo FO, Williams ID, Cherrett TJ. 27.  2011. How are WEEE doing? A global review of the management of electrical and electronic wastes. Waste Manag. 31:4714–30 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lebersorger S, Schneider F. 28.  2011. Discussion on the methodology for determining food waste in household waste composition studies. Waste Manag. 31:9–101924–33 [Google Scholar]
  29. Beede DN, Bloom DE. 29.  1995. The economics of municipal solid waste. World Bank Res. Obs. 10:2113–50 [Google Scholar]
  30. Wilson DC, Araba AO, Chinwah K, Cheeseman CR. 30.  2009. Building recycling rates through the informal sector. Waste Manag. 29:2629–35 [Google Scholar]
  31. 31. OECD. 2008. OECD Factbook. 2008: Economic, Environmental, and Social Statistics: Municipal Waste. Paris. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/factbook-2008-en/08/02/02/index.html;jsessionid=3cjh6uqov1wuq.epsilon?contentType=/ns/Chapter,/ns/StatisticalPublication&itemId=/content/chapter/factbook-2008-62-en&containerItemId=/content/book/factbook-2008-en&accessItemIds=&mimeType=text/html
  32. Couth R, Trois C. 32.  2010. Carbon emissions reduction strategies in Africa from improved waste management: a review. Waste Manag. 30:112336–46 [Google Scholar]
  33. Couth R, Trois C. 33.  2011. Waste management activities and carbon emissions in Africa. Waste Manag. 31:1131–37 [Google Scholar]
  34. Friedrich E, Trois C. 34.  2011. Quantification of greenhouse gas emissions from waste management processes for municipalities—a comparative review focusing on Africa. Waste Manag. 31:71585–96 [Google Scholar]
  35. Parrot L, Sotamenou J, Dia BK. 35.  2009. Municipal solid waste management in Africa: strategies and livelihoods in Yaoundé, Cameroon. Waste Manag. 29:2986–95 [Google Scholar]
  36. Wilson DC. 36.  2007. Development drivers for waste management. Waste Manag. Res. 25:3198–207 [Google Scholar]
  37. Bras A, Berdier C, Emmanuel E, Zimmerman M. 37.  2009. Problems and current practices of solid waste management in Port-au-Prince (Haiti). Waste Manag. 29:112907–9 [Google Scholar]
  38. Chen X, Geng Y, Fujita T. 38.  2010. An overview of municipal solid waste management in China. Waste Manag. 30:4716–24 [Google Scholar]
  39. Strasser S. 39.  1999. Waste and Want: A Social History of Trash New York City: Metropolitan Books.355
  40. Kaika M, Swyngedouw E. 40.  2000. Fetishizing the modern city: the phantasmagoria of urban technological networks. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 24:1120–38 [Google Scholar]
  41. Thieme T. 41.  2010. Youth, waste and work in Mathare: Whose business and whose politics?. Environ. Urbanization 22:2333–52 [Google Scholar]
  42. Moore SA. 42.  2009. The excess of modernity: garbage politics in Oaxaca, Mexico. Prof. Geogr. 61:4426–37 [Google Scholar]
  43. Vergara S. 43.  2011. Transforming trash: reuse as a waste management and climate change mitigation strategy PhD dissertation Univ. Calif., Berkeley. Berkeley: ProQuest/UMI
  44. Louis GE. 44.  2004. A historical context of municipal solid waste management in the United States. Waste Manag. Res. 22:4306–22 [Google Scholar]
  45. Kollikkathara N, Feng H, Stern E. 45.  2009. A purview of waste management evolution: special emphasis on USA. Waste Manag. 29:2974–85 [Google Scholar]
  46. Ziblatt D. 46.  2008. Why some cities provide more public goods than others: a subnational comparison of the provision of public goods in German cities in 1912. Comp. Stud. Int. Dev. 43:3–4273–89 [Google Scholar]
  47. Tsai L. 47.  2007. Solidary groups, informal accountability, and local public goods provision in China. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 101:2355–72 [Google Scholar]
  48. Ostrom E. 48.  2000. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. J. Econ. Perspect. 14:3137–58 [Google Scholar]
  49. Chibber P, Nooruddin I. 49.  2004. Do party systems count?. Comp. Pol. Stud. 37:2152–87 [Google Scholar]
  50. Savedoff W, Spiller P. 50.  1999. Spilled Water: Institutional Commitment in the Provision of Water Services Washington, DC: Inter-Am. Dev. Bank
  51. Tripp AM. 51.  1997. Changing the Rules: The Politics of Liberalization and the Urban Informal Economy in Tanzania Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  52. Delgado A. 52.  2008. Informal economy thrives in cities Washington, DC: Worldwatch Inst. http://www.worldwatch.org/node/5480
  53. Medina M. 53.  2007. The World's Scavengers: Salvaging for Sustainable Consumption and Production Lanham, MD: Alta Mira
  54. Wilson DC, Velis C, Cheeseman C. 54.  2006. Role of informal sector recycling in waste management in developing countries. Habitat Int. 30:4797–808 [Google Scholar]
  55. Mitchell CL. 55.  2008. Altered landscapes, altered livelihoods: the shifting experience of informal waste collecting during Hanoi's urban transition. Geoforum 39:62019–29 [Google Scholar]
  56. Claudel N. 56.  2010. Solid waste workers and livelihood strategies in Greater Port-au-Prince, Haiti. Waste Manag. 30:61138–48 [Google Scholar]
  57. Martin M. 57.  2000. Scavenger cooperatives in Asia and Latin America. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 31:151–69 [Google Scholar]
  58. Gutberlet J. 58.  2008. Recovering Resources—Recycling Citizenship: Urban Poverty Reduction in Latin America Aldershot, UK: Ashgate
  59. Turan N, Gamze SC, Akdemir A, Ergun ON. 59.  2009. Municipal solid waste management strategies in Turkey. Waste Manag. 29:1465–69 [Google Scholar]
  60. Fahmi WS. 60.  2005. The impact of privatization of solid waste management on the Zabaleen garbage collectors of Cairo. Environ. Urban. 17:2155–70 [Google Scholar]
  61. Fahmi WS, Sutton K. 61.  2006. Cairo's Zabaleen garbage recyclers: multi-nationals' takeover and state relocation plans. Habitat Int. 30:4809–37 [Google Scholar]
  62. Fahmi WS, Sutton K. 62.  2010. Cairo's contested garbage: sustainable solid waste management and the Zabaleen's right to the city. Sustainability 2:1765–83 [Google Scholar]
  63. Christensen T. 63.  2011. Solid Waste Technology and Management West Sussex, UK: Wiley
  64. Rhyner CR. 64.  1995. Waste Management and Resource Recovery Boca Raton, Fla: Lewis
  65. Gajalakshmi S, Abbasi SA. 65.  2008. Solid waste management by composting: state of the art. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38:5311–400 [Google Scholar]
  66. De Baere L. 66.  2006. Will anaerobic digestion of solid waste survive in the future?. Water Sci. Technol. 53:8187–94 [Google Scholar]
  67. Verstraete W, Morgan-Sagastume F, Aiyuk S, Waweru M, Rabaey K, Lissens G. 67.  2005. Anaerobic digestion as a core technology in sustainable management of organic matter. Water Sci. Technol. 52:1-259–66 [Google Scholar]
  68. Edelmann W, Engeli H, Gradenecker M. 68.  2000. Co-digestion of organic solid waste and sludge from sewage treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 41:3213–21 [Google Scholar]
  69. Li Q, Zheng L, Cai H, Garza E, Yu Z, Zhou S. 69.  2011. From organic waste to biodiesel: black soldier fly, Hermetia illucens, makes it feasible. Fuel 90:41545–48 [Google Scholar]
  70. Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA, Dong F, Elobeid A. 70.  et al. 2008. Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319:58671238–40 [Google Scholar]
  71. Gaunt JL, Lehmann J. 71.  2008. Energy balance and emissions associated with biochar sequestration and pyrolysis bioenergy production. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42:114152–58 [Google Scholar]
  72. Reijnders L. 72.  2009. Are forestation, bio-char and landfilled biomass adequate offsets for the climate effects of burning fossil fuels?. Energy Policy 37:82839–41 [Google Scholar]
  73. Lehmann J. 73.  2007. A handful of carbon. Nature 447:7141143–44 [Google Scholar]
  74. Fowles M. 74.  2007. Black carbon sequestration as an alternative to bioenergy. Biomass Bioenergy 31:6426–32 [Google Scholar]
  75. Agunwamba JC. 75.  2003. Analysis of scavengers? Activities and recycling in some cities of Nigeria. Environ. Manag. 32:1116–27 [Google Scholar]
  76. Henry RK, Zhao Y, Dong J. 76.  2006. Municipal solid waste management challenges in developing countries—Kenyan case study. Waste Manag. 26:192–100 [Google Scholar]
  77. Erkman S. 77.  1997. Industrial ecology: an historical view. J. Clean. Prod. 5:1–21–10 [Google Scholar]
  78. Vergara SE, Damgaard A, Horvath A. 78.  2011. Boundaries matter: greenhouse gas emission reductions from alternative waste treatment strategies for California's municipal solid waste. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 57:87–97 [Google Scholar]
  79. Lovins AB. 79.  1996. Negawatts: twelve transitions, eight improvements and one distraction. Energy Policy 24:4331–43 [Google Scholar]
  80. Rogers EM. 80.  1995. Diffusion of Innovations New York: Free., 4th ed..
  81. Schor JB. 81.  1991. The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline of Leisure New York: Basic Books.247
  82. De Jaeger S, Eyckmans J, Rogge N, Van Puyenbroeck T. 82.  2011. Wasteful waste-reducing policies? The impact of waste reduction policy instruments on collection and processing costs of municipal solid waste. Waste Manag. 31:71429–40 [Google Scholar]
  83. Sakai S, Ikematsu T, Hirai Y, Yoshida H. 83.  2008. Unit-charging programs for municipal solid waste in Japan. Waste Manag. 28:122815–25 [Google Scholar]
  84. Skumatz LA. 84.  2008. Pay as you throw in the US: implementation, impacts, and experience. Waste Manag. 28:122778–85 [Google Scholar]
  85. Christensen TH, Gentil E, Boldrin A, Larsen A, Weidema BP, Hauschild M. 85.  2009. C balance, carbon dioxide emissions and global warming potentials in LCA-modelling of waste management systems. Waste Manag. Res. 27:8707–15 [Google Scholar]
  86. 86. Eur. Parliam. Counc. 2008. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain directives. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32008L0098:EN:NOT
  87. Graedel TE. 87.  1998. Streamlined Life-Cycle Assessment Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
  88. 88. ISO. 2006. Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework, 14040 Series. Geneva, Switz.: Int. Organ. Stand.
  89. 89. ISO. 2006. Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Requirements and Guidelines. European Standard. EN ISO 14040. Geneva, Switz.: Int. Organ. Stand
  90. Finnveden G. 90.  1999. Methodological aspects of life cycle assessment of integrated solid waste management systems. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 26:3–4173–87 [Google Scholar]
  91. Gentil EC, Clavreul J, Christensen TH. 91.  2009. Global warming factor of MSW management in Europe. Waste Manag. Res. 27:9850–60 [Google Scholar]
  92. Ekvall T, Assefa G, Bjorklund A, Eriksson O, Finnveden G. 92.  2007. What life-cycle assessment does and does not do in assessments of waste management. Waste Manag. 27:8989–96 [Google Scholar]
  93. Barton JR, Issaias I, Stentiford EI. 93.  2008. Carbon—making the right choice for waste management in developing countries. Waste Manag. 28:4690–98 [Google Scholar]
  94. Gentil EC, Aoustin E, Christensen TH. 94.  2009. Greenhouse gas accounting and waste management. Waste Manag. Res. 27:696–706 [Google Scholar]
  95. Rabl A, Benoist A, Dron D, Peuportier B, Spadaro J, Zoughaib A. 95.  2007. How to account for CO2 emissions from biomass in an LCA. Int. J. LCA 12:5281 [Google Scholar]
  96. Gentil E, Damgaard A, Bhander GS, Hauschild M, Finnveden G. 96.  et al. 2010. Models for waste life cycle assessment: review of technical assumptions. Waste Manag. 30:122636–48 [Google Scholar]
  97. Hunt C. 97.  1996. Child waste pickers in India: the occupation and its health risks. Environ. Urban. 8:2111–18 [Google Scholar]
  98. Viel J-F, Arveux P, Baverel J, Cahn JY. 98.  2000. Soft-tissue sarcoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma clusters around a municipal solid waste incinerator with high dioxin emission levels. Am. J. Epidemiol. 152:113–19 [Google Scholar]
  99. Williams E, Kahhat R, Allenby B, Kavazanjian E, Kim J, Xu M. 99.  2008. Environmental, social and economic implications of global reuse and recycling of personal computers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42:176446–54 [Google Scholar]
  100. Chi X, Streicher-Porteet M, Wang MYL, Reuter MA. 100.  2011. Informal electronic waste recycling: a sector review with special focus on China. Waste Manag. 31:731–42 [Google Scholar]
  101. Sepúlveda A, Schluep M, Renaud FG, Streicher M, Kuehr R. 101.  et al. 2011. A review of the environmental fate and effects of hazardous substances released from electrical and electronic equipments during recycling: examples from China and India. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 30:128–41 [Google Scholar]
  102. Giusti L. 102.  2009. A review of waste management practices and their impact on human health. Waste Manag. 29:82227–39 [Google Scholar]
  103. Gregory MR. 103.  2009. Environmental implications of plastic debris in marine settings—entanglement, ingestion, smothering, hangers-on, hitch-hiking and alien invasions. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 364:15262013–25 [Google Scholar]
  104. Moore CJ, Moore SL, Leecaster MK, Weisberg SB. 104.  2001. A comparison of plastic and plankton in the North Pacific central gyre. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 42:121297–300 [Google Scholar]
  105. Derraik JGB. 105.  2002. The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris: a review. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 44:9842–52 [Google Scholar]
  106. Hohn D. 106.  2008. Sea of trash. New York Times June 22, Mag. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/22/magazine/22Plastics-t.html
  107. Law KL, Morét-Ferguson S, Maximenko NA, Proskurowski G, Peacock EE. 107.  et al. 2010. Plastic accumulation in the North Atlantic subtropical gyre. Science 329:59961185–88 [Google Scholar]
  108. Frosch RA. 108.  1992. Industrial ecology: a philosophical introduction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:3800–3 [Google Scholar]
  109. Chertow MR. 109.  2000. Industrial symbiosis: literature and taxonomy. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 25:313–37 [Google Scholar]
  110. Mulvihill MJ, Beach ES, Zimmerman JB, Anastas PT. 110.  2011. Green chemistry and green engineering: a framework for sustainable technology development. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 36:1271–93 [Google Scholar]
  111. Shaw D, Newholm T. 111.  2002. Voluntary simplicity and the ethics of consumption. Psychol. Mark. 19:2167–85 [Google Scholar]
  112. McDonald S, Oates CJ, Young CW, Hwang K. 112.  2006. Toward sustainable consumption: researching voluntary simplifiers. Psychol. Mark. 23:6515–34 [Google Scholar]
  113. Peattie K. 113.  2010. Green consumption: behavior and norms. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 35:1195–228 [Google Scholar]
  114. Ekere W, Mugisha J, Drake L. 114.  2009. Factors influencing waste separation and utilization among households in the Lake Victoria crescent, Uganda. Waste Manag. 29:123047–51 [Google Scholar]
  115. Levis JW, Barlaz MA. 115.  2011. Is biodegradability a desirable attribute for discarded solid waste? Perspectives from a national landfill greenhouse gas inventory model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45:135470–76 [Google Scholar]
  116. Joseph K. 116.  2006. Stakeholder participation for sustainable waste management. Habitat Int. 30:4863–71 [Google Scholar]
  117. Agarwal R, Gupta SK. 117.  2003. Rethinking urban waste in India: creating a community paradigm. Soc. Change 33:2–351–68 [Google Scholar]
  118. Sharholy M, Ahmad K, Mahmood G, Trivedi RC. 118.  2008. Municipal solid waste management in Indian cities—a review. Waste Manag. 28:2459–67 [Google Scholar]
  119. Martínez Ariza N. 119.  2012. Bogotá, sin vehículos de tracción animal. Elespectador (online), Apr. 20. http://www.elespectador.com/impreso/articuloimpreso-240683-bogota-sin-vehiculos-de-traccion-animal
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-050511-122532
Loading
Municipal Solid Waste and the Environment: A Global Perspective
Annual Review of Environment and Resources 37, 277 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-050511-122532
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-050511-122532
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-050511-122532
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error