1932

Abstract

Commentators routinely describe “populism” as vague. Some argue that the early US populists, who coined the modern usage, were not populists. We disagree and identify this common conceptual core: the “people” in a moral battle against “elites.” The core definition fits all cases of populism: those on the left and right, those in the United States, Europe, and elsewhere. In addition to this minimal common core, we identify strongly suggested and frequently correlated non-core characteristics. These include the people's homogeneity and exclusivity, direct rule, and nationalism, as well as a single leader, vilification of vulnerable out-groups, and impatience with deliberation. The US Populist Party and Spain's Podemos Party fit the core definition but have few of the other characteristics. The core can be good for democracy, we argue, while the associated characteristics are often dangerous. Populism in opposition can be good for democracy, while populism in power carries great risks.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042843
2019-10-13
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lawsocsci/15/1/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042843.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042843&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abts K, Rummens S. 2007. Populism versus democracy. Political Stud 55:2405–24
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Achen CH, Bartels L. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  3. Albertazzi D, McDonnell D 2008. Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan
  4. Albright M. 2018. Fascism: A Warning New York: Harper Collins
  5. Am. Natl. Elect. Stud. (ANES) 2012. American National Election Study Ann Arbor, MI: Am. Natl. Elect. Stud. accessed June 18, 2019. http://isr-anesweb.isr.umich.edu/ANES_Data_Tools/variable_v2.html?year=2012&variable=electintpo_richbuy
  6. Arato A. 2015. Political theology and populism. The Promise and Perils of Populism: Global Perspectives ed. C de la Torre 31–58 Lexington: Univ. Press Ky.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Arato A, Cohen JL. 2017. Civil society, populism and religion. Constellations 24:3283–95
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Autor D, Dorn D, Hanson G, Majlesi K 2016. Importing political polarization? The electoral consequences of rising trade exposure Work. Pap. 22637, NBER. http://www.nber.org/papers/w22637
  9. Bartlett KT. 1990. Feminist legal methods. Harvard Law Rev 103:829–88
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bennhold K. 2018. A new coalition with Merkel? Not so fast. New York Times Jan. 19. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/19/world/europe/angela-merkel-germany-spd.html
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bohman J. 2005. From Demos to Demoi: democracy across borders. Ratio Juris 18:3293–314
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bonikowski B, Gidron N. 2016a. Multiple traditions in populism research: toward a theoretical synthesis. APSA Comp. Politics Newsl. 26:27–14
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bonikowski B, Gidron N 2016b. The populist style in American politics: presidential campaign discourse, 1952–1996. Soc. Forces 94:41593–621
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Brown S. 2017. Sen. Sherrod Brown: Donald Trump and Marine Le Pen are fake populists. Cincinnati.com May 10. https://www.cincinnati.com/story/opinion/contributors/2017/05/10/sen-sherrod-brown-donald-trump-and-marine-le-pen-fake-populists/101509228/
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Canovan M. 1981. Populism London: Junction Books
  16. Canovan M. 2002. Taking politics to the people: populism as the ideology of democracy. Democracies and the Populist Challenge ed. Y Mény, Y Surel 25–44 London: Palgrave Macmillan
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Converse PE. 1964. The nature of belief systems in mass publics. Ideology and Discontent ed. DE Apter 206–61 New York: Free Press Glencoe
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Cramer K. 2016. The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  19. De Nadal LA. 2018. From “horizontal” to “vertical”: the institutionalization of the Indignados Movement Paper delivered at the International Communications Association Annual Conference, Prague, May
  20. Errejón I (with G Boutin, A Devecchio) 2018. La plus grande reforme qui soit est celle de l'ordre. La Figaro, March 30. http://www.lefigaro.fr/vox/politique/2018/03/30/31001-20180330ARTFIG00244-iigo-errejn-la-plus-grande-reforme-qui-soit-est-celle-de-l-ordre.php
  21. Í and C. | 2016
    Errejón Í, Mouffe C. 2016. Podemos: In the Name of the People London: Lawrence & Wishart
  22. Fisher R, Ury W, Patton B 1991. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In New York: Penguin Books. , 2nd ed..
  23. Frank J. 2017. Populism and praxis. See Kaltwasser et al. 2017 629–43
  24. Frankfurt HG. 2005. On Bullshit Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  25. Fraser N. 1995. From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a “post-socialist” age. New Left Rev 1:21268–93
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Freeden M. 1996. Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  27. Gallie WB 1955–1956. Essentially contested concepts. Proc. Aristot. Soc. 56:167–98
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Galston WA. 2018. Anti-Pluralism: The Populist Threat to Liberal Democracy New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  29. Garvin WL, Daws SO. 1887. History of the National Farmers’ Alliance and Cooperative Union of America Jacksboro, TX: J. N. Rogers & Co.
  30. Gidron N, Hall PA. 2018. Populism as a problem of social integration Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, Aug. 31
  31. Gilens M, Page BI. 2014. Testing theories of American politics: elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspect. Politics 12:3564–81
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Goodin RW. 2007. Enfranchising all affected interests, and its alternatives. Philos. Public Aff. 35:140–68
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Goodwyn L. 1976. The Populist Moment: A Short History of the Agrarian Revolt in America Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  34. Grofman B, Feld SL. 1988. Rousseau's general will: a Condorcetian perspective. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 82:2567–76
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hall PA. 2019. The electoral politics of growth regimes. Perspect. Politics. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Hawkins KA. 2010. Venezuela's Chavismo and Populism in Comparative Perspective Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  37. Hetherington M, Weiler JD. 2009. Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  38. Honneth A. 1995 (1992). The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts transl. J Anderson Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  39. Iglesias P. 2015. Discurso íntegro de Pablo Iglesias en la Puerta del Sol. Lamarea Feb 4. http://www.lamarea.com/2015/02/04/discurso-integro-de-pablo-iglesias-en-la-puerta-del-sol/
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Inglehart RF, Norris P. 2016. Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: economic have-nots and cultural backlash Work. Pap. RWP16–026, Fac. Res. Ser., Harvard Kennedy School Cambridge, MA:
  41. Ionescue G, Gellner E. 1969. Populism: Its Meaning and National Characteristics London: Macmillan
  42. Ivaldi G, Lanzone ME, Woods D 2017. Varieties of populism across a left-right spectrum: the case of the Front National, the Northern League, Podemos and Five Star Movement. Swiss Political Sci. Rev. 23:4354–76
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Ivarsflaten E. 2008. What unites right-wing populists in Western Europe? Re-examining grievance mobilization models in seven successful cases. Comp. Political Stud. 41:13–23
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Judis JB. 2016. The Populist Explosion: How the Great Recession Transformed American and European Politics New York: Columbia Glob. Rep.
  45. Kaltwasser CR, Taggart P, Ochoa Espejo P, Ostiguy P 2017. The Oxford Handbook of Populism Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  46. Kazin M. 2017a. Working too hard for too little: an interview with Senator Sherrod Brown. Dissent 64:325–31
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Kazin M. 2017b. The Populist Persuasion: An American History Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press. , 2nd ed..
  48. Kriesi H. 2014. The populist challenge. West Eur. Politics 37:2361–78
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Laclau E. 2005. On Populist Reason London: Verso
  50. Lax DA, Sebenius JK. 2006. 3-D Negotiation: Powerful Tools to Change the Game in Your Most Important Deals Cambridge, MA: Harvard Bus. School Press
  51. Lessig L. 2011. Republic, Lost: How Money Corrupts Congress—and a Plan to Stop It New York: Twelve/Hachett
  52. Lévi-Strauss C. 1950. Introduction à l'oeuvre de Marcel Mauss. Mauss, Sociologie et Anthropologie Paris: Presses Univ. France
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Levitsky S, Ziblatt D. 2018. How Democracies Die New York: Crown Publ.
  54. Mansbridge J. 2019. Recursive representation. Creating Political Presence ed. D Castiglione, J Pollak 298–337 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Mansbridge J, Macedo S, Foster C 2019. Populism and democratic theory: an extended view Paper delivered at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, SSRN. https://www.ssrn.com
  56. McCormick JP. 2011. Machiavellian Democracy Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  57. McNall SG. 1988. The Road to Rebellion: Class Formation and Kansas Populism, 1865–1900 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  58. Mitchell TR. 1987. Political Education in the Southern Farmers’ Alliance, 1887–1900 Madison: Univ. Wis. Press
  59. Mouffe C. 2018. For a Left Populism London: Verso
  60. Mudde C. 2004. The populist zeitgeist. Gov. Oppos. 39:4541–63
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Mudde C. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  62. Mudde C. 2017. Populism: an ideational approach. See Kaltwasser et al. 2017 27–47
  63. Mudde C, Kaltwasser CR. 2017. Populism: A Very Short Introduction Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  64. Müller J-W. 2016. What Is Populism? Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
  65. Mussolini B, Gentile G. 1935 (1932). The doctrine of fascism. Fascism Doctrine and Institutions ed. B Mussolini 7–42 Rome: Ardita Publ. http://www.worldfuturefund.org/wffmaster/Reading/Germany/mussolini.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Norris P. 2015. Why Elections Fail Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  67. Ober J. 2017. Demopolis: Democracy Before Liberalism in Theory and Practice Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  68. Ochoa Espejo PO. 2017. Populism and the idea of the people. See Kaltwasser et al. 2017 607–28
  69. Panizza F. 2005. Introduction. Populism and the Mirror of Democracy ed. F Panizza 1–31 London: Verso
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Pedler A. 1927. Going to the people: the Russian Narodniki in 1874–5. Slavon. Rev. 6:16130–41
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Piketty T. 2018. Brahmin left versus merchant right: rising inequality and the changing structure of political conflict (evidence from France, Britain and the US, 1948–2017 Work. Pap. Ser. No. 2018/7, WID.world, World Inequal. Lab
  72. Przeworski A, Sprague J. 1988. Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  73. Rawls J. 1999. The Law of Peoples Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  74. Rodrik D. 2018a. In defense of economic populism. Project Syndicate Jan 9. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/defense-of-economic-populism-by-dani-rodrik-2018-01
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Rodrik D. 2018b. Is populism necessarily bad economics?. AEA Pap. Proc. 108:196–99
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Rodrik D. 2018c. Populism and the economics of globalization. J. Int. Bus. Policy 1:1–212–33
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Rosanvallon P. 2008 (2006). Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust transl. A Goldhammer Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  78. Rousseau J-J. 1997 (1762). The social contract. The Second Contract and Other Later Political Writings transl. V Gourevitch Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Sabel CF, Zeitlin J. 2008. Learning from difference: the new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU. Eur. Law J. 14:271–327
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Saxton A. 1971. The Indispensable Enemy: Labor and the Anti-Chinese Movement in California Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  81. Schumpeter JA. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy New York: Harper and Brothers
  82. Sherif M, Harvey OJ, Jack White B, Hood WR, Sherif CW 1961 (1954). Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment Norman, OK: Univ. Book Exch.
  83. Stanley B. 2008. The thin ideology of populism. J. Political Ideol. 13:195–110
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Stilz A 2009. Liberal Loyalty: Freedom, Obligation, and the State Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  85. Tajfel H 1970. Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Sci. Am. 223:596–103
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Tamir Y 1993. Liberal Nationalism Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  87. Taylor C 1992. Multiculturalism and “the Politics of Recognition.” Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  88. Tindall GB 1966. A Populist Reader: Selections from the Works of American Populist Leaders New York: Harper Torchbooks
  89. Urbinati N 1998. Democracy and populism. Constellations 5:1110–24
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Urbinati N 2014. Democracy Disfigured: Opinion, Truth, and the People Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  91. Urbinati N 2019a. Me the People: How Populism Transforms Democracy Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  92. Urbinati N 2019b. Political theory of populism. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 22111–27
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Walicki A 1969. Russia. See Ionescue & Gellner 1969 62–96
  94. Walzer M 1983. Spheres of Justice New York: Basic Books
  95. Wittgenstein L 1967 (1953). Philosophical Investigations transl. G.E.M. Anscobe Oxford, UK: Blackwell
  96. Wodak R 2015. The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean London: Sage
  97. Woodward CV 1938. Tom Watson and the Negro in agrarian politics. J. South. Hist. 4:114–33
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Woodward CV 1959–1960. The populist heritage and the intellectual. Am. Sch. 29:155–72
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Woodward CV 1973 (1938). Tom Watson: Agrarian Rebel Savannah, GA: Beehive
  100. World Values Survey 2013. Wave 2010–2014, Germany, variable V228G accessed on June 15, 2019. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSOnline.jsp
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042843
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error