1932

Abstract

This autobiographical article, which began as an interview, reports some reflections by Lila Gleitman on the development of her thinking and her research—in concert with a host of esteemed collaborators over the years—on issues of language and mind, focusing on how language is acquired. Gleitman entered the field of linguistics as a student of Zellig Harris, and learned firsthand of Noam Chomsky's early work. She chose the psychological perspective, later helping to found the field of cognitive science; and with her husband and long-term collaborator, Henry Gleitman, for over 50 years fostered a continuing research community aimed at answering questions such as: When language input to the child is restricted, what is left to explain language acquisition? The studies reported here find that argument structure encoded in the syntax is key (syntactic bootstrapping) and that children learn word meaning in epiphanies (propose but verify).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011718-011640
2019-01-14
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/linguistics/5/1/annurev-linguistics-011718-011640.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011718-011640&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Armstrong SL, Gleitman LR, Gleitman H 1983. What some concepts might not be. Cognition 13:263–308
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown R, Cazden C, Bellugi U 1968. The child's grammar from I to III. Minneapolis Symposium on Child Psychology 2 JP Hill 28–73 Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Carey S 1982. Semantic development: the state of the art. Language Acquisition: The State of the Art E Wanner, LR Gleitman 347–89 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cartmill EA, Armstrong BF, Gleitman LR, Goldin-Meadow S, Medina TN, Trueswell JC 2013. Quality of early parent input predicts child vocabulary 3 years later. PNAS 110:11278–83
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chomsky N 1957. Syntactic Structures The Hague: Mouton
  6. Chomsky N 1959. A review of B.F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior. Language 35:26–58
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chomsky N 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  8. Connolly AC, Fodor J, Gleitman LR, Gleitman H 2007. Why stereotypes don't even make good defaults. Cognition 103:1–22
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Feldman H, Goldin-Meadow S, Gleitman LR 1978. Beyond Herodotus: the creation of language by linguistically deprived deaf children. Action, Symbol, and Gesture: The Emergence of Language A Lock 351–414 New York: Academic
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fisher C, Gleitman H, Gleitman LR 1991. On the semantic content of subcategorization frames. Cogn. Psychol. 23:331–92
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gillette J, Gleitman H, Gleitman LR, Lederer A 1999. Human simulations of vocabulary learning. Cognition 73:135–76
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gleitman H, Gleitman LR 1979. Language use and language judgment. Individual Differences in Language Ability and Language Behavior C Fillmore, D Kemler, W Wang 103–26 New York: Academic
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gleitman LR, January D, Nappa R, Trueswell JC 2007. On the give and take between event apprehension and utterance formulation. J. Mem. Lang. 57:544–69
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gleitman LR, Rozin P 1977. The structure and acquisition of reading: relations between orthographies and the structure of language. Toward a Psychology of Reading A Reber, D Scarborough 55–141 Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Harris ZS 1951. Methods in Structural Linguistics Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  16. Harris ZS 1952. Discourse analysis. Language 28:1–30
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hirsh-Pasek K, Gleitman LR, Gleitman H 1978. What did the brain say to the mind? A study of the detection and report of ambiguity by young children. The Child's Conception of Language A Sinclair, RJ Jarvella, WJM Levelt 97–132 Berlin: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hirsh-Pasek K, Treiman R 1982. Doggerel: motherese in a new context. J. Child Lang. 9:229–37
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hume D 1738–1740. A Treatise of Human Nature Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  20. Klima ES, Bellugi U 1979. The Signs of Language Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  21. Landau B, Gleitman LR 1985. Language and Experience: Evidence from the Blind Child Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  22. Levinson SC 1996. Frames of reference and Molyneux's question: cross-linguistic evidence. Language and Space: Language, Speech, and Communication P Bloom, MA Peterson, L Nadel, MF Garrett 385–436 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Li P, Abarbanell L, Gleitman L, Papafragou A 2011. Spatial reasoning in Tenejapan Mayans. Cognition 120:33–53
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Li P, Gleitman LR 2002. Turning the tables: language and spatial reasoning. Cognition 83:265–94
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lidz J, Gleitman H, Gleitman L 2003. Understanding how input matters: verb learning and the footprint of universal grammar. Cognition 87:151–78
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Locke J 1690. An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding London: Thomas Bassett
  27. Medina TN, Snedeker J, Trueswell JC, Gleitman LR 2011. How words can and cannot be learned by observation. PNAS 108:9014–19
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Naigles L 1990. Children use syntax to learn verb meanings. J. Child Lang. 17:357–74
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Naigles L, Gleitman H, Gleitman L 1993. Syntactic bootstrapping and verb acquisition. Language and Cognition: A Developmental Perspective E Dromi 104–40 Norwood, NJ: Ablex
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Nappa R, Wessell A, McEldoon KL, Gleitman LR, Trueswell JC 2009. Use of speaker's gaze and syntax in verb learning. Lang. Learn. Dev. 5:203–34
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Newport EL 1975. Motherese: the speech of mothers to young children PhD thesis Univ. Pa. Philadelphia:
  32. Newport EL, Gleitman H, Gleitman LR 1977. Mother, I'd rather do it myself: some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style. Talking to Children CE Snow, CA Ferguson 109–49 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Papafragou A, Cassidy K, Gleitman LR 2007. When we think about thinking: the acquisition of belief verbs. Cognition 105:125–65
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Pinker S 1984. Language Learnability and Language Development Cogn. Sci. Ser. 7 Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  35. Plato 2009. Phaedo transl. D Gallop Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  36. Rodd LJ, Braine MDS 1971. Children's imitations of syntactic constructions as a measure of linguistic competence. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 10:430–43
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Senghas A, Coppola M, Newport EL, Supalla T 1997. Argument structure in Nicaraguan Sign Language: the emergence of grammatical devices. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development 2 E Hughes, M Hughes, A Greenhill 550–61 Somerville, MA: Cascadilla
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Shipley E, Smith C, Gleitman L 1969. A study in the acquisition of language: free responses to commands. Language 45:322–42
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Smith LB, Yu C, Pereira AF 2011. Not your mother's view: the dynamics of toddler visual experience. Dev. Sci. 14:9–17
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Trueswell JC, Medina T, Hafri A, Gleitman L 2013. Propose but verify: Fast mapping meets cross-situational word learning. Cogn. Psychol. 66:126–56
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Whorf BL 1956. Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  42. Woodard K, Gleitman L, Trueswell J 2016. Two- and three-year-olds track a single meaning during word learning: evidence for propose-but-verify. Lang. Learn. Dev. 12:252–61
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Yu C, Smith LB 2007. Rapid word learning under uncertainty via cross-situational statistics. Psychol. Sci. 18:414–20
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011718-011640
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011718-011640
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error