Artificial Language Learning in Children

Literature Cited

1. Adger D 2003. Core Syntax Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
2. Arnon I, Ramscar M 2012. Granularity and the acquisition of grammatical gender: how order-of-acquisition affects what gets learned. Cognition 122:292–305
   [Google Scholar]
3. Aslin RN 2007. What's in a look?. Dev. Sci. 10:48–53
   [Google Scholar]
4. Aslin RN, Newport EL 2012. Statistical learning from acquiring specific items to forming general rules. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 21:170–76
   [Google Scholar]
5. Aslin RN, Saffran JR, Newport EL 1998. Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants. Psychol. Sci. 9:321–24
   [Google Scholar]
6. Austin AC, Newport EL, Wonnacott E 2006. Predictable versus unpredictable variation: regularization in adult and child learners Paper presented at the 31st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development Boston, MA:
7. Baker CL 1979. Syntactic theory and the projection problem. Linguist. Inq. 10:533–81
   [Google Scholar]
8. Baker M 2001. The Atoms of Language: The Mind's Hidden Rules of Grammar New York: Basic Books
9. Berko J 1958. The child's learning of English morphology PhD thesis, Radcliffe Coll Cambridge, MA:
10. Braine MDS 1963. On learning the grammatical order of words. Psychol. Rev. 70:323
    [Google Scholar]
11. Braine MDS 1987. What is learned in acquiring word classes: a step toward an acquisition theory. Mechanisms of Language Acquisition B MacWhinney 65–87 Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
    [Google Scholar]
12. Braine MDS, Brody RE, Brooks PJ, Sudhalter V, Ross JA et al. 1990. Exploring language acquisition in children with a miniature artificial language: effects of item and pattern frequency, arbitrary subclasses, and correction. J. Mem. Lang. 29:591–610
    [Google Scholar]
13. Braquet G, Culbertson J 2017. Harmony in a non-harmonic language: word order learning in French children. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society G Gunzelmann, A Howes, T Tenbrink, E Davelaar 156–61 Austin, TX: Cogn. Sci. Soc.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Brooks PJ, Braine MDS, Catalano L, Brody RE, Sudhalter V 1993. Acquisition of gender-like noun subclasses in an artificial language: the contribution of phonological markers to learning. J. Mem. Lang. 32:76–95
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bruening P, Brooks P, Alfieri L, Kempe V, Dabasinskiene I 2012. Children's tolerance of word-form variation. Child Dev. Res. 2012:401680
    [Google Scholar]
16. Chomsky N, Halle M 1968. The Sound Pattern of English New York: Harper & Row
17. Crain S, Nakayama M 1987. Structure dependence in grammar formation. Language 63:522–43
    [Google Scholar]
18. Cristià A, Seidl A 2008. Is infants’ learning of sound patterns constrained by phonological features?. Lang. Learn. Dev. 4:203–27
    [Google Scholar]
19. Culbertson J 2012. Typological universals as reflections of biased learning: evidence from artificial language learning. Lang. Linguist. Compass 6:310–29
    [Google Scholar]
20. Culbertson J, Gagliardi A, Smith K 2017. Competition between phonology and semantics in noun class learning. J. Mem. Lang. 92:343–58
    [Google Scholar]
21. Culbertson J, Jarvinen H, Haggarty F, Smith K 2018. Do children privilege phonological cues in noun class learning?. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society C Kalish, M Rau, R Zhu, T Rogers Austin, TX: Cogn. Sci. Soc. In press
    [Google Scholar]
22. Culbertson J, Kirby S 2016. Simplicity and specificity in language: Domain-general biases have domain-specific effects. Front. Psychol. 6:1964
    [Google Scholar]
23. Culbertson J, Koulaguina E, Gonzalez-Gomez N, Legendre G, Nazzi T 2016. Developing knowledge of non-adjacent dependencies. Dev. Psychol. 52:2174–83
    [Google Scholar]
24. Culbertson J, Newport EL 2015. Harmonic biases in child learners: in support of language universals. Cognition 139:71–82
    [Google Scholar]
25. Culbertson J, Newport EL 2017. Innovation of word order harmony across development. Open Mind Discov. Cogn. Sci. 1:91–100
    [Google Scholar]
26. Culbertson J, Smolensky P, Legendre G 2012. Learning biases predict a word order universal. Cognition 122:306–29
    [Google Scholar]
27. Demuth K 2000. Bantu noun class systems: loanword and acquisition evidence of semantic productivity. Systems of Nominal Classification G Senft 270–92 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
28. Demuth K, Ellis D 2008. Revisiting the acquisition of Sesotho noun class prefixes. Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Festschrift for Dan Slobin J Guo, E Lieven, S Ervin-Tripp, N Budwig, K Nakamura 93–104 Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
    [Google Scholar]
29. de Vries MH, Monaghan P, Knecht S, Zwitserlood P 2008. Syntactic structure and artificial grammar learning: the learnability of embedded hierarchical structures. Cognition 107:763–74
    [Google Scholar]
30. Dryer M 1992. The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68:81–183
    [Google Scholar]
31. Erickson LC, Thiessen ED 2015. Statistical learning of language: theory, validity, and predictions of a statistical learning account of language acquisition. Dev. Rev. 37:66–108
    [Google Scholar]
32. Ettlinger M, Morgan-Short K, Faretta-Stutenberg M, Wong P 2016. The relationship between artificial and second language learning. Cogn. Sci. 40:822–47
    [Google Scholar]
33. Ferdinand V, Kirby S, Smith K 2014. Regularization in language evolution: on the joint contribution of domain-specific biases and domain-general frequency learning. Evolution of Language: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference (EVOLANG10) EA Cartmill, S Roberts, H Lyn, H Cornish 435–36 Singapore: World Sci.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Friederici AD, Mueller JL, Oberecker R 2011. Precursors to natural grammar learning: preliminary evidence from 4-month-old infants. PLOS ONE 6:e17920
    [Google Scholar]
35. Gagliardi A, Lidz J 2014. Statistical insensitivity in the acquisition of Tsez noun classes. Language 90:58–89
    [Google Scholar]
36. Gerken L 2004. Nine-month-olds extract structural principles required for natural language. Cognition 93:B89–96
    [Google Scholar]
37. Gerken L 2006. Decisions, decisions: infant language learning when multiple generalizations are possible. Cognition 98:B67–74
    [Google Scholar]
38. Gerken L, Wilson R, Lewis W 2005. Infants can use distributional cues to form syntactic categories. J. Child Lang. 32:249–68
    [Google Scholar]
39. Gómez RL 2002. Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychol. Sci. 13:431–36
    [Google Scholar]
40. Gómez RL, Gerken L 1999. Artificial grammar learning by 1-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge. Cognition 70:109–35
    [Google Scholar]
41. Gómez RL, Gerken L 2000. Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4:178–86
    [Google Scholar]
42. Gómez RL, Lakusta L 2004. A first step in form-based category abstraction by 12-month-old infants. Dev. Sci. 7:567–80
    [Google Scholar]
43. Gómez RL, Maye J 2005. The developmental trajectory of nonadjacent dependency learning. Infancy 7:183–206
    [Google Scholar]
44. Greenberg J 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. Universals of Language J Greenberg 73–113 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
45. Hawkins JA, Cutler A 1988. Psycholinguistic factors in morphological asymmetry. Explaining Language Universals JA Hawkins 280–317 Oxford, UK: Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
46. Hawthorne K, Rudat L, Gerken L 2016. Prosody and the acquisition of hierarchical structure in toddlers and adults. Infancy 21:603–24
    [Google Scholar]
47. Hayes B, Kirchner R, Steriade D 2004. Phonetically Based Phonology Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
48. Hohle B, Schmitz M, Santelmann LM, Weissenborn J 2006. The recognition of discontinuous verbal dependencies by German 19-month-olds: evidence for lexical and structural influences on children's early processing capacities. Lang. Learn. Dev. 2:277–300
    [Google Scholar]
49. Houston-Price C, Nakai S 2004. Distinguishing novelty and familiarity effects in infant preference procedures. Infant Child Dev 13:341–48
    [Google Scholar]
50. Hudson Kam C, Chang A 2009. Investigating the cause of language regularization in adults: memory constraints or learning effects?. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 35:815
    [Google Scholar]
51. Hudson Kam C, Newport E 2009. Getting it right by getting it wrong: when learners change languages. Cogn. Psychol. 59:30–66
    [Google Scholar]
52. Hunter T, Lidz J 2012. Conservativity and learnability of determiners. J. Semant. 30:315–34
    [Google Scholar]
53. Hupp JM, Sloutsky VM, Culicover PW 2009. Evidence for a domain-general mechanism underlying the suffixation preference in language. Lang. Cogn. Process. 24:876–909
    [Google Scholar]
54. Johnson EK, Jusczyk PW 2001. Word segmentation by 8-month-olds: when speech cues count more than statistics. J. Mem. Lang. 44:548–67
    [Google Scholar]
55. Johnson EK, Tyler MD 2010. Testing the limits of statistical learning for word segmentation. Dev. Sci. 13:339–45
    [Google Scholar]
56. Jusczyk PW, Cutler A, Redanz NJ 1993. Infants’ preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. Child Dev 64:675–87
    [Google Scholar]
57. Jusczyk PW, Luce P, Charles-Luce J 1994. Infants’ sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. J. Mem. Lang. 33:630–45
    [Google Scholar]
58. Karmiloff-Smith A 1981. A Functional Approach to Child Language: A Study of Determiners and Reference New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
59. Keenan EL, Stavi J 1986. A semantic characterization of natural language determiners. Linguist. Philos. 9:253–326
    [Google Scholar]
60. Kemler Nelson DG, Jusczyk PW, Mandel DR, Myers J, Turk A, Gerken L 1995. The head-turn preference procedure for testing auditory perception. Infant Behav. Dev. 18:111–16
    [Google Scholar]
61. Kuhl PK, Williams KA, Lacerda F, Stevens KN, Lindblom B 1992. Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science 255:606–8
    [Google Scholar]
62. Langus A, Marchetto E, Bion RAH, Nespor M 2012. Can prosody be used to discover hierarchical structure in continuous speech. J. Mem. Lang. 66:285–306
    [Google Scholar]
63. Lany J, Gómez RL 2008. Twelve-month-old infants benefit from prior experience in statistical learning. Psychol. Sci. 19:1247–52
    [Google Scholar]
64. Lightfoot D 1999. The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change, and Evolution New York: Blackwell
65. Marcus GF, Vijayan S, Rao SB, Vishton PM 1999. Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. Science 283:77–80
    [Google Scholar]
66. Mariscal S 2009. Early acquisition of gender agreement in the Spanish noun phrase: starting small. J. Child Lang. 36:143–71
    [Google Scholar]
67. Mills AE 1985. The acquisition of German. The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, vol. 1: The Data DI Slobin 141–254 Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
    [Google Scholar]
68. Mintz TH 1996. The roles of linguistic input and innate mechanisms in children's acquisition of grammatical categories PhD thesis, Univ. Rochester Rochester, NY:
69. Mintz TH, Walker RL, Welday A, Kidd C 2018. Infants’ sensitivity to vowel harmony and its role in segmenting speech. Cognition 171:95–107
    [Google Scholar]
70. Misyak JB, Christiansen MH 2012. Statistical learning and language: an individual differences study. Lang. Learn. 62:302–31
    [Google Scholar]
71. Moreton E, Pater J 2012.a Structure and substance in artificial-phonology learning, part I: structure. Lang. Linguist. Compass 6:686–701
    [Google Scholar]
72. Moreton E, Pater J 2012.b Structure and substance in artificial-phonology learning, part II: substance. Lang. Linguist. Compass 6:702–18
    [Google Scholar]
73. Morgan JL, Meier RP, Newport EL 1987. Structural packaging in the input to language learning: contributions of prosodic and morphological marking of phrases to the acquisition of language. Cogn. Psychol. 19:498–550
    [Google Scholar]
74. Morgan JL, Meier RP, Newport EL 1989. Facilitating the acquisition of syntax with cross-sentential cues to phrase structure. J. Mem. Lang. 28:360–74
    [Google Scholar]
75. Morgan JL, Newport EL 1981. The role of constituent structure in the induction of an artificial language. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 20:67–85
    [Google Scholar]
76. Morgan JL, Saffran JR 1995. Emerging integration of sequential and suprasegmental information in preverbal speech segmentation. Child Dev 66:911–36
    [Google Scholar]
77. Newport EL 1990. Maturational constraints on language learning. Cogn. Sci. 14:11–28
    [Google Scholar]
78. Newport EL, Aslin RN 2004. Learning at a distance I: statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies. Cogn. Psychol. 48:127–62
    [Google Scholar]
79. Onnis L, Monaghan P, Richmond K, Chater N 2005. Phonology impacts segmentation in online speech processing. J. Mem. Lang. 53:225–37
    [Google Scholar]
80. Peperkamp S, Le Calvez R, Nadal J-P, Dupoux E 2006. The acquisition of allophonic rules: statistical learning with linguistic constraints. Cognition 101:B31–41
    [Google Scholar]
81. Perez-Pereira M 1991. The acquisition of gender: what Spanish children tell us. J. Child Lang. 18:571–90
    [Google Scholar]
82. Perfors A, Burns N 2010. Adult language learners under cognitive load do not over-regularize like children. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society S Ohlsson, R Catrambone 2524–29 Austin, TX: Cogn. Sci. Soc.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Petersson KM, Forkstam C, Ingvar M 2004. Artificial syntactic violations activate Broca's region. Cogn. Sci. 28:383–407
    [Google Scholar]
84. Pullum G, Scholz BC 2002. Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments. Linguist. Rev. 19:9–50
    [Google Scholar]
85. Pycha A, Nowak P, Shin E, Shosted R 2003. Phonological rule-learning and its implications for a theory of vowel harmony. Proceedings of the 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics M Tsujimura, G Garding 101–14 Somerville, MA: Cascadilla
    [Google Scholar]
86. Reali F, Griffiths TL 2009. The evolution of frequency distributions: relating regularization to inductive biases through iterated learning. Cognition 111:317–28
    [Google Scholar]
87. Reber AS 1967. Implicit learning of artificial grammars. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 6:855–63
    [Google Scholar]
88. Reber AS 1969. Transfer of syntactic structure in synthetic languages. J. Exp. Psychol. 81:115–19
    [Google Scholar]
89. Reber AS 1989. Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 118:219–35
    [Google Scholar]
90. Reeder PA, Newport EL, Aslin RN 2013. From shared contexts to syntactic categories: the role of distributional information in learning linguistic form-classes. Cogn. Psychol. 66:30–54
    [Google Scholar]
91. Rodina Y, Westergaard M 2012. A cue-based approach to the acquisition of grammatical gender in Russian. J. Child Lang. 39:1077–106
    [Google Scholar]
92. Romberg AR, Saffran JR 2010. Statistical learning and language acquisition. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cogn. Sci. 1:906–14
    [Google Scholar]
93. Saffran JR 2003. Statistical language learning mechanisms and constraints. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 12:110–14
    [Google Scholar]
94. Saffran JR, Aslin RN, Newport EL 1996. Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science 274:1926–28
    [Google Scholar]
95. Saffran JR, Thiessen ED 2003. Pattern induction by infant language learners. Dev. Psychol. 39:484
    [Google Scholar]
96. Samara A, Smith K, Brown H, Wonnacott E 2017. Acquiring variation in an artificial language: Children and adults are sensitive to socially conditioned linguistic variation. Cogn. Psychol. 94:85–114
    [Google Scholar]
97. Santelmann L, Jusczyk P 1998. Sensitivity to discontinuous dependencies in language learners: evidence for limitations in processing space. Cognition 69:105–34
    [Google Scholar]
98. Schuler K, Yang C, Newport E 2016. Testing the tolerance principle: Children form productive rules when it is more computationally efficient to do so. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society A Papafragou, D Grodner, D Mirman, J Trueswell 2321–26 Austin, TX: Cogn. Sci. Soc.
    [Google Scholar]
99. Schwab JF, Lew-Williams C, Goldberg AE 2018. When regularization gets it wrong: Children over-simplify language input only in production. J. Child Lang 45:1054–72
    [Google Scholar]
100. Siegelman N, Arnon I 2015. The advantage of starting big: Learning from unsegmented input facilitates mastery of grammatical gender in an artificial language. J. Mem. Lang. 85:60–75
     [Google Scholar]
101. Smith K, Wonnacott E 2010. Eliminating unpredictable variation through iterated learning. Cognition 116:444–49
     [Google Scholar]
102. Tomasello M 2000. The item-based nature of children's early syntactic development. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4:156–63
     [Google Scholar]
103. Werker JF, Tees RC 1984. Cross-language speech perception: evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behav. Dev. 7:49–63
     [Google Scholar]
104. Wonnacott E 2011. Balancing generalization and lexical conservatism: an artificial language study with child learners. J. Mem. Lang. 65:1–14
     [Google Scholar]
105. Wonnacott E 2013. Learning: statistical mechanisms in language acquisition. The Language Phenomenon PM Binder, K Smith 65–92 New York: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
106. Wonnacott E, Brown H, Nation K 2017. Skewing the evidence: the effect of input structure on child and adult learning of lexically based patterns in an artificial language. J. Mem. Lang 95:36–48
     [Google Scholar]
107. Wonnacott E, Newport EL, Tanenhaus MK 2008. Acquiring and processing verb argument structure: distributional learning in a miniature language. Cogn. Psychol. 56:165–209
     [Google Scholar]
108. Yang CD 2004. Universal grammar, statistics or both?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8:451–56
     [Google Scholar]
109. Yang CD 2005. On productivity. Linguist. Var. Yearb. 5:265–302
     [Google Scholar]